A POLYMER COATED METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORK
20220169662 · 2022-06-02
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01D2253/204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/3293
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/3272
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/3425
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C09D133/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/327
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/226
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02C20/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C02F1/288
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/3206
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C09D133/08
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D2253/25
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
C07F1/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C09D133/08
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present invention relates to metal-organic framework characterized in that it comprises a polymer coating; further the invention relates to a process for the preparation of said polymer-coated metal-organic framework and a process for recycling after degradation. The polymer coated MOFs of this invention find application in a broad range of technologies and therapeutic areas.
Claims
1. A metal-organic framework characterized in that it comprises a polymer coating.
2. The metal-organic framework of claim 1, wherein the metal-organic framework comprises one or more metal ions or metal clusters and one or more organic linkers, the metal ions or metal clusters being of any metal selected from the periodic table, preferably a metal from group IIA, IIIA, first row transition metals, second row transition metals, actinides, and lanthanides.
3. The metal-organic framework of claim 2, wherein the organic linkers are small organic molecules with two or more coordinating functional groups.
4. The metal-organic framework of claim 1, wherein the BET surface area ranges from 10 m.sup.2/g to 7000 m.sup.2/g.
5. The metal-organic framework of claim 1, wherein the pore size ranges from 0.3 nm to 10 nm.
6. The metal-organic framework of claim 1, wherein the polymer coating is selected from styrene, acrylate, and methacrylate polymer coatings, and further from polyimide, polysulfone, polyethersulfone, and polyamide polymer coatings.
7. The metal-organic framework of claim 1, wherein the polymer coating has a thickness of from 1 nm to 1 μm.
8. (canceled)
9. A process for the preparation of a metal-organic framework comprising a polymer coating, a controlled radical polymerization step.
10. A process for recycling of degraded polymer-coated metal-organic frameworks, comprising vapor or liquid assisted annealing or a solvothermal reaction.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] (Note: the annotation “RE” means recrystallized and “DE” means degraded)
[0010] Scheme 1. Synthesis scheme of random copolymer 1 (RCP1).
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0018] The present disclosure relates to metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are compounds consisting of metal ions or clusters coordinated by organic ligands (linkers) to form one-, two-, or three-dimensional structures. These MOFs are typically crystalline materials meaning that their exact structures can be obtained through techniques like single crystal X-ray diffraction or powder X-ray diffraction. They possess many properties analogous to traditional porous materials such as zeolites and porous carbons. These include intrinsic microporosity/mesoporosity and high BET surface area from 10 m.sup.2/g up to 7000 m.sup.2/g. Additionally, MOFs possess unique properties that traditional porous materials do not have. These include modular synthesis meaning that the pore size, shape and chemical environment can be systematically designed by judicious selection of organic linkers and metal coordination modes.
[0019] The MOFs used for present disclosure can be synthesized by a wide variety of methods that are commonly known in the art. These include but not limited to hydrothermal synthesis, solvothermal synthesis, mechanosynthesis, microwave assisted synthesis, spray-drying synthesis, continuous flow synthesis etc.
[0020] The MOFs used for present disclosure comprise one or more metal ions or metal clusters and one or more organic linkers. The metal ions or metal clusters can be any metal selected from the periodic table and preferably metals from group IIA, IIIA, first row transition metals, second row transition metals, actinides, and lanthanides. Preferred metals are selected from Al, Cr, Zr, Sc, Hf, Ti, Cu, Co, In, Fe, Ni, Zn and V. Preferred metals are Cu and Zn.
[0021] The organic linkers used in the MOFs are small organic molecules with two or more coordinating functional groups and are not particularly limited. Preferred functional groups are carboxylic acids (carboxylates), nitrogen containing five/six-member rings (pyridine, imidazole, pyrazole, pyrazine, 1,2,3-triazole, 1,2,4-triazole, tetrazole etc.), and phenols, etc. More preferred linking ligands for linking the adjacent metal building units in the MOF structure are carboxylate-based ligands, which include 1,3,5-benzenetribenzoate (BTB), 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (BDC), cyclobutyl 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (CB BDC), 2-amino 1,4 benzene-dicarboxylate (H2N-BDC) , 4,5,9,10-tetrahydropyrene-2,7-dicarboxylate (HPDC), terphenyl dicarboxylate (TPDC), 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate (NDC), pyrene 2,7-dicarboxylate (PDC), biphenyl dicarboxylate (BDC), and any di-, tri-, or tetracarboxylate containing phenyl rings.
[0022] The average MOF particle size is from 10 nm to 1 mm and preferably from 100 nm to 1 μm, more preferably from 100 μm to 10 μm, and in particular from 10 μm to 1 μm. The particle size is identified by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
[0023] The BET surface area of the MOFs used in this disclosure range from 10 m.sup.2/g to 7000 m.sup.2/g and preferably from 100 m.sup.2/g to 4000 m.sup.2/g. The BET surface area is identified using N.sub.2 adsorption isotherm data.
[0024] The pore size of the MOFs used in this disclosure range from 0.3 nm to 10 nm and preferably from 0.3 nm to 1 nm.
[0025] According to the present disclosure, it was found that by coating the MOF particle surface with a thin layer of polymer through controlled radical polymerization, the metal ions and organic ligands are well-confined within the polymeric boundary to give relatively stable MOF@polymer composites (
[0026] According to the present disclosure, the MOF particles need to be coated with a layer of polymer in order to confine the metal ions and organic linker molecules within that were used for the construction of the MOF structure and, in addition, to ensure optimal recrystallization efficiency.
[0027] The polymer coatings used in this disclosure are conventional polymer coatings and not particularly limited. Suitable examples include styrene, acrylate, methacrylate polymer coatings, etc. which can be synthesized using radical initiated polymerization techniques; further polyimide, polysulfone, polyether-sulfone, polyamide polymer coatings, etc. Preferred examples of the polymer coating are polystyrenes, polyimides, polysulfone.
[0028] The “HKUST” terminology used herein is in accordance with the terminology introduced by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology which first appeared in (10.1126/science.283.5405.1148).
[0029] The thickness of the polymer coating preferably ranges from 1 nm to 1 μm and particularly from 2 nm to 100 nm.
[0030] Further, the invention relates to a process for preparing a metal-organic framework comprising a polymer coating, comprising a controlled radical polymerization step, preferably using a technique selected from atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization (RAFT), or nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMP). Particularly, the process used for coating the polymer comprises controlled radical polymerization techniques using acrylates, methacrylate, styrenic monomers etc.
[0031] According to the present disclosure, it was further found that even after degradation of the polymer coated MOFs (MOF@polymer) under harsh environment, no apparent leaching of components from the MOF structure was observed due to the barrier effect of the polymer shell (
[0032] A typical vapor assisted annealing process is carried out by exposing a polymer-coated metal-organic framework sample to an organic vapor environment under heating conditions, generally above the boiling point of the solvent used. A preferred heating temperature range is from 60-200° C. Common organic solvent selections include methanol, ethanol, propanol, dimethylformamide, N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone, and dimethylacetamide etc. and their combinations. Preferably methanol, ethanol and dimethylformamide. Additives may be added to assist the dissolution of linkers and metal ions. Examples of additives include trifluoracetic acid, acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, and formic acid etc.
[0033] A typical liquid assisted annealing process is carried out by the addition of a small quantity of organic solvent to a polymer-coated metal-organic framework sample followed by heating, suitably in a temperature range from room temperature (25° C.) to 200° C. The solvent and additive selection is similar to that of vapor assisted annealing process. The quantity of the solvent is typically quite small, with volume comparable to the solid. Specifically, the solid-liquid volumetric ratio is typically in the range between 1:10 and 10:1. This process can be used to regenerate polymer coated MOF-based sorbent materials on-site with high efficiency and low cost in a short amount of time thereby greatly extending the lifespan of said MOF materials.
[0034] In contrast to the polymer coated MOF structures of the present disclosure, non-coated MOF structures with similar MOF composition showed severe leaching issues, and further could not be recrystallized according to the procedures of the present disclosure.
[0035] Hereinafter the invention will be further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLES
Experimental methods
[0036] 1. Electron Microscopy
[0037] Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted by JEM-1400Plus TEM (120 kV) and JEM 2100 plus (200 kV). Briefly, 10 μL Sample-Methanol solution was directly deposited on a carbon coated TEM grid for 30 seconds. Then, excessive solution was wicked away with pieces of filter paper. Then the grid was dried for 15 minutes under 70° C.
[0038] 2. Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD)
[0039] PXRD patterns were collected in the 2θ range of 5-30° at room temperature on a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.54184 Å) at a scan rate of 2°/min and a step size of 0.02°
[0040] 3. CO.sub.2 Adsorption-Desorption Analysis
[0041] CO.sub.2 adsorption-desorption analysis was performed with a volumetric adsorption analyzer (e.g. BELSORP-max II or Quantachrome iQ or Micromeritics ASAP 2020). All samples were pre-exchanged with volatile organic solvents (e.g. MeOH) to remove pre-existing high boiling point solvents. Then the samples were activated at 120° C. for 10 h under constant vacuum.
Example 1
Synthesis of Random Copolymer (RCP1) P(vbpt-r-ba-r-aa) (wherein ba: butyl acrylate; aa: acrylic acid; and vbpt: S-(4-vinyl) benzyl S′-propyltrithiocarbonate) (see Scheme 1)
[0042] MOF Preparation HKUST-1
[0043] 12.2 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.3H.sub.2O and 2.9 g of benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid was dissolved in 25 ml of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) under 65° C. for 30 min. The solution was then injected into 250 ml of methanol containing 2.5 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone under vigorously stirring at 55° C. for 90 min. The products were harvested by centrifuging and washing twice with methanol, and finally dispersed in methanol for further use.
[0044] Preparation of HKUST-1@PS
[0045] Dissolve 1 g of HKUST-1 and 250 mg of P(vbpt-r-ba-r-aa) in 15 ml of dichloromethane (DCM), the mixture is sealed in a small capped vial and sonicated to get well dispersed. After 12 hours of incubation, the particles were washed twice with toluene and then again dispersed in 15 ml of toluene. Then 4.5 ml of styrene, 1.125 ml of divinylbenzene (DVB) and 15 mg of azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) were added to the solution. Three freeze-pump-thaw cycles were applied to the solution to remove dissolved O.sub.2. Then the ampule was sealed under vacuum. The polymerization reaction was carried out at 75° C. for 1.5 h under constant stirring.
[0046] The CO.sub.2 uptake capacity of HKUST-1@PS at 298 K is 83 cc/g (
[0047] CO.sub.2 uptake is measured by using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) theory. CO.sub.2 uptake isotherms were obtained using a volumetic sorption analyzer. Commonly used commercial modes include Belsorb MAX II, Quantachrome iQ, Micromeritics ASAP 2020 etc. Typically, ˜30-50 mg of MOF sample was loaded into a glass sample cell and then activated at 120° C. for 10 h under a constant vacuum. The sample cell was then loaded on to the sorption analyzer for subsequent analysis.
Example 2
[0048] Degradation and Recrystallization Experiment
[0049] To mimic the degradation process in industry, 150° C. water vapor environment was used to facilitate the degradation process of HKUST-1@PS. The degraded product was therefore named HKUST-1@PS-DE.
[0050] After degradation, the powder X-ray diffraction pattern shows the disappearance of HKUST-1 characteristic peaks by replaced by a new phase.
[0051] The recrystallization process was carried out by exposing HKUST-1@PS-DE to an appropriate solvent vapor under heat. The recrystallized product HKUST-1@PS-RE showed complete regeneration of HKUST-1 crystallinity.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0052] Degradation HKUST-1@PS by H.sub.2O at 150° C.
[0053] A HKUST-1@PS powder sample (˜15 mg) was placed on a glass slide and the slide was loaded into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel hydrothermal reactor containing ˜1 ml of water. The glass slide was suspended above the water without touching. The reactor was placed in a 150° C. oven overnight. After cooling the reactor, the sample was taken out, collected and denoted as HKUST-1@PS-DE. The PXRD pattern of HKUST-1@PS-DE is shown in
[0054] Recrystallization of HKUST-1@PS-DE
[0055] HKUST-1@PS-DE (˜15 mg) was placed on a glass slide and loaded into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel hydrothermal reactor containing ˜1 ml of an ethanol/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) mixture (ethanol:TFA=98:2). The glass slide was suspended above the solvent layer without touching. The reactor was placed in a 100° C. oven overnight. After cooling, the sample was taken out, collected and denoted as HKUST-1@PS-RE. The PXRD pattern of HKUST-1@PS-RE is shown in
[0056] Degradation-Recrystallization Cycling of HKUST-1@PS
[0057] HKUST-1@PS was degraded and recrystallized using aforementioned procedures for 5 cycles. Their CO.sub.2 uptake capacity at 1 bar, 298 K was recorded and plotted in
Example 3
[0058] Comparative Example—Non-Polymer Coated MOF
[0059] Degradation HKUST-1 by H.sub.2O vapor at 150° C. A HKUST-1 sample (˜15 mg) was placed on to a glass slides and the slide was loaded into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel hydrothermal reactor containing ˜1 ml of water. The glass slide was suspended above the water without touching. The reactor was placed in a 150° C. oven overnight. After cooling the reactor, the sample was taken out, collected and denoted as HKUST-1-DE. The PXRD pattern of HKUST-1-DE is shown in
##STR00001## ##STR00002##