Electrode agnostic, supply variant stimulation engine for implantable neural stimulation
11311728 · 2022-04-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
Many embodiments of the invention provide a neuromodulation system that includes a digital control unit (DCU) that activates a stimulation engine during active stimulation, a current mirror that includes two feedback loops including a first feedback loop with positive feedback (PF) made of an error amplifier A.sub.1 and transistors M.sub.3 and M.sub.1 and a second feedback loop with a negative feedback (NF) made of the error amplifier A.sub.1 and transistor M.sub.3, and a high-voltage adaptive rail (V.sub.dd/V.sub.ss) to accommodate voltage drops across high electrode impedances.
Claims
1. An integrated circuit comprising, a multi-channel stimulation and sensing unit comprising a plurality of electrode contacts that provide concurrent stimulation and sensing; an on-chip power management unit; an on-chip electrode agnostic stimulation engine circuitry comprising: a digital control unit (DCU) that activates the electrode agnostic stimulation engine during active stimulation; a current mirror comprising two feedback loops including a first feedback loop with positive feedback (PF) and a second feedback loop with a negative feedback (NF); and a high-voltage adaptive rail (V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS) to accommodate voltage drops across high electrode impedances, wherein when the at least one contact is stimulating with a particular current level, the DCU configures an output of the high-voltage adaptive rail to produce stimulation power supplies V.sub.DD and V.sub.SS according to the at least one electrode contact impedance.
2. The integrated circuit of claim 1, wherein the first feedback loop with positive feedback comprises an error amplifier A.sub.1 and transistors M.sub.3 and M.sub.1.
3. The integrated circuit of claim 2, wherein the second feedback loop with negative feedback comprises the error amplifier A.sub.1 and transistor M.sub.3.
4. The integrated circuit of claim 1, further comprising adaptive closed-loop 4-stage charge pumps that provides supply rails V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS.
5. The integrated circuit of claim 1, wherein the PF is synchronized with an input signal and is determined as a positive loop gain (LF) within a feedback loop.
6. The integrated circuit of claim 1, further comprising an extra NF that includes another operation amplifier A.sub.2, wherein a plus terminal of amplifier A.sub.2 is attached to a bias voltage, V.sub.B to facilitate the V.sub.out swing increase of the mirror by shielding the input of A.sub.1.
7. The integrated circuit of claim 1, further comprising cascode PMOS/NMOS amplifiers that control voltage-levels close to V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS.
8. The integrated circuit of claim 1, further comprising: a local switch matrix (LSM) for biphasic control and post-stimulation active charge balancing.
9. The integrated circuit of claim 1, wherein the DCU configures an output of high voltage generators to produce stimulation power supplies V.sub.DD and V.sub.SS.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(15) Turning now to the drawings, neuromodulation systems in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are illustrated. In many embodiments, in order to support different types of electrodes and a big range of stimulation current, the neuromodulation system provides a stimulation mechanism that is not electrode dependent. In several embodiments, the stimulation mechanism can account for “capacitive-looking” electrodes, extending the bipolar on-chip headroom of a CMOS stimulator. Accordingly, many embodiments provide a universal electrode agnostic stimulation engine that is fully programmable and which supply rails are variable to further save power. In several embodiments, during the simultaneous, multichannel, differential stimulation, the neuromodulation system provides superior current matching and makes concurrent stimulation and sensing possible.
(16) To support simultaneous multi-channel, electrode agnostic stimulation, many embodiments use a very high output impedance current source/sink for a wide range of stimulus currents. In many embodiments, these features are possible due to the employment of feedback loops (negative and positive) used in the circuit. In particular, many embodiments of the neuromodulation system use a current mirror that includes two feedback loops: first with a positive feedback (PF) and second with a negative feedback (NF). In many embodiments, PF is always synchronized with the input signal and can be determined as a positive loop gain (LG) within a feedback loop. In many embodiments, the neuromodulation system includes an extra NF that includes another operational amplifier can be added in the circuit. In many embodiments, folded cascode PMOS/NMOS amplifiers are employed to enable proper loop operation at voltage-levels close to V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS. Neuromodulation systems in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are described in detail below.
(17) Introduction
(18) Neuromodulation, e.g. deep-brain stimulation (DBS), can provide symptomatic relief to neurological disease by emitting pulses to overcome abnormal brain activity. It is efficacious in Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders, which are anatomically focal, where open-loop stimulation on just one contact is sufficient. The same technology doesn't show therapeutic benefit in network-scale indications such as depression or Alzheimer's disease, where a more precise localization as well as distributed sensing and stimulation are necessary. Since neurological conditions could stem from many brain regions, a modular neural interface with higher channel count can be desirable. Also, continuous open-loop stimulation can be harmful and it can lose efficacy over time because of the changes in the brain. Therefore, closed loop control can be desirable to understand the basic science of a disease. A closed loop system may require concurrent stimulation and sensing capability, where stimulation parameters can be adapted based on neural features extracted from the sensed data. Such a closed loop approach can significantly enhance therapeutic efficacy, minimize the undesirable outcomes, and improve the understanding of hidden brain dynamics.
(19) As an important part of neuromodulation (NM) units, neural stimulators play a significant role in most every neural treatment. In general, stimulator power dominates the overall NM power. Also, stimulator IC design is generally driven by electrode performances (e.g., impedance, size of contacts, among various other constraints). Moreover, electrode impedance can vary in time.
(20) Types of Neural Stimulation and Biphasic Current Pulses
(21) Neural stimulation can be delivered as a train of controlled current pulses, which are usually zero-mean, into specific brain regions to modulate brain activity. Stimulation may be performed using techniques such as (but not limited to) a neural probe, or micro-electrode array, which serves as an interface between neurons and the electronic circuitry. As a first order approximation, an electrode-tissue model can be depicted as it is shown in
(22)
(23) Safe operations of the stimulator is necessary, otherwise tissue damage may occur. Tissue damage can be induced in several different ways, including: i) heat dissipation whereby the implanted hardware releases too much heat that can effectively cause the temperature to rise at the electrode-tissue interface, currently the FDA safe limit is <2° C.; ii) charge imbalance during stimulation; iii) excessive charge injection, whereby the size (cross-section) and the electrode material dictates the limit for the safe charge density.
(24) Neural stimulation can be monopolar and differential. In monopolar stimulation, usually there are several stimulating electrodes and one return electrode which plays the role in the charge recovery. This method shows shortcomings if precise stimulus localization is necessary.
(25) There are several types of neural stimulation. Each type brings different types of drawbacks and benefits. In particular, Voltage Current Stimulation (VCS) can provide power efficient stimulation, but since electrode impedance may vary over time and position, the charge balancing can be problematic. Recently proposed Switched-Capacitor Stimulation (SCS) offers a good tradeoff between safety and efficiency, but SCS can require a big number of off-chip capacitors and typically cannot be used in multi-channel, simultaneous stimulation since current splitting among channels is undesirable. As a widely used method in neural stimulation, current-controlled stimulation (CCS) offers an accurate charge control, but it can reduce power efficiency because of the voltage drops across current mirrors (sink/source) in the output stage of stimulators.
(26) Different applications may need different types of electrodes (e.g., deep brain stimulation (DBS), epiretinal stimulation, among others); macro and micro electrode contacts show big range in tissue-electrode capacitances—from a few nF to a few μF. To support various electrodes and to allow a wide range of stimulation currents, it may be important to have a stimulation mechanism that accounts for the “capacitance-dominant” electrodes and extends the on-chip voltage headroom for the stimulation circuitry. Since many embodiments of the neuromodulation system design provide simultaneous, multichannel and electrode agnostic stimulation engines that may compensate for the variability of electrode-tissue impedance, efficient CCS design is a preferable choice.
(27) Design Settings
(28) Many embodiments of the neuromodulation system target a next generation neural interface that is minimally invasive and addresses the demands for limited area and power. Furthermore, many embodiments of the neuromodulation system provide real-time, full duplex communication during concurrent stimulation and recording of neural signals. Further, many embodiments of the neuromodulation system provide a modular approach and scalable architecture that should allow gathering data from a grid of NM implants.
(29) In a particular neuromodulation system developed in a first stage, a wired supplied 32-channel module together with 4-driver-to-32-channel fully flexible stimulation module can deliver up to 3.1 mA per engine in a 128-channel implantable closed-loop system. In a second stage, the capability was scaled up to 64 channels, with stimulation to include 8 drivers (A-H, 5.1 mA each), supported with highly efficient wireless power and data link. In many embodiments, this interface can be integrated together with implantable electrode arrays and packages into 64-channel modules that may be further assembled into a 256-channel system.
(30) System Architecture
(31) In many embodiments, there are several primarily targeted applications. The first one considers an implantable neuromodulation system for DBS treatment.
(32) Stimulation Engine
(33) In the core of every stimulation engine (SE), many embodiments include a current source and/or current sink depending on the types of neural stimulation. The electrode-tissue impedance varies over time and its value may also depend on electrode placement in the nerves. Also, different electrodes may have different impedances depending on the material that they are made of and depending on the size of contacts (e.g., range −100's Ω−1 MΩ). To support simultaneous multi-channel, electrode agnostic stimulation, many embodiments may need a very high output impedance current source/sink for a wide range of stimulus currents. Furthermore, the current mirrors should have a high output compliance to compensate the source/sink additional voltage headroom requirements in CCS, so that most of the rail-to-rail voltage can be dedicated to the output electrode pair (differential voltage).
(34) As illustrated in
V.sub.OUT≤V.sub.G2−V.sub.DSAT3. (1)
(35) To prevent this, in many embodiments, an extra NF that includes another operational amplifier (A.sub.2) can be added in the circuit. The plus terminal of amplifier A.sub.2 can be attached to a bias voltage, V.sub.B. This would imply that the voltage at the plus terminal of A.sub.1 is going to be set to a wanted value and enlarging values of V.sub.OUT may not push the loop run by A.sub.1 to its bound. Attaching the plus terminal of amplifier A.sub.2 to a V.sub.B may facilitate the V.sub.OUT swing increase of the mirror by shielding the input of A.sub.1. From the small signal analysis, the output resistance of the current mirror can be expressed as
R.sub.OUT=r.sub.04g.sub.m4r.sub.01g.sub.m2A.sub.2R.sub.IN, (2)
where R.sub.IN represents the input resistance of the mirror. This clearly shows that amplifier A.sub.2 also contributes to the boosted output resistance. The output resistance may be boosted and the voltage compliance is expected to be approximately V.sub.DD−2 V.sub.DSAT. In many embodiments, folded cascode PMOS/NMOS amplifiers are employed to provide the proper loop operation at voltage-levels close to V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS. Although
(36)
(37)
(38) In many embodiments, the shape, amplitude, various timing parameters and SENSE/STIM MUXs can be configured by the DCU and updated on-the-fly. The output of the STIM engine may be connected to the local switch matrix (LSM), which is employed for the biphasic control and post-stimulation active charge balancing. Any residual charge on the electrodes can be cancelled out by shorting. In many embodiments, the HV channel-selection MUX provides a fine spatial granularity (8:64 MUX with integrated HV LS), for a multitude of stimulation sites. Since the control signals typically have a 1.8V level and HV STIM engine may require unipolar-to-bipolar voltage conversion, many embodiments employ a specific architecture, an exemplary embodiment of which is illustrated in
(39) Power efficient stimulators may be necessary in energy-limited systems. The stimulator engine can dissipate significant power at its output stage, especially when it delivers small currents. This can be the main drawback of a system that implements CCS. To additionally save the power, in several embodiments, a high-voltage adaptive-rail (V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS) is provided to accommodate voltage drops across high electrode impedances. When the electrode sites are stimulating with specific current levels, DCU can configure (e.g., control bits cc_3, cc_4) the output of the high voltage generators to produce stimulation power supplies V.sub.DD and V.sub.SS according to the stimulation electrode needs (lower current—lower stimulation voltage and vice versa). An adaptive HV stimulation approach may prolong battery life up to 10×. At the same time, in many embodiments, a reconfigurable BandGap Circuit and Reference Current Source, as illustrated in
(40) Adaptive High Voltage Generator
(41) As discussed above, power efficient stimulation in energy limited applications can be an imperative. Stimulators generally may require high voltage and high power dual supplies to support a wide range of stimulations currents and differential stimulations. Fully integrated High Voltage Generators (HVG) in multi-voltage systems with high power efficiency may be implemented.
(42) Many embodiments provide a neuromodulation system designed with adaptive closed-loop 4-stage charge pumps, with a leakage reduction scheme, that can provide ±7.5V supply rails (V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS)−max 3.5× voltage conversion ratio.
(43) To further increase energy savings, an efficient high voltage V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS scaling may be employed. DCU can configure control bits cc_3, cc_4 to accommodate the outputs V.sub.DD and V.sub.SS of HVG at the optimal value which is sufficient for power efficient stimulation.
(44) In the core of the HVG scheme there may be multiple pumping stages with non-overlapping clock generators and a feedback loop as shown in the embodiment illustrated in
(45) In this topology, the voltage drop across the stage is roughly equal to 2 V.sub.DS, while the output voltage can be approximated as
(46)
where
(47)
and C.sub.f is flying capacitor while f.sub.s denotes the switching frequency.
(48) For an integrated implementation (flying capacitors on-chip) and mA output current capability to achieve a high voltage gain and high power efficiency, the switching frequency may need to be in 10's of MHz range. Power efficiencies for both positive and negative closed-loop charge pumps in accordance with an embodiment of the invention are illustrated in
(49) Another constraint may come from the stimulator requirement. During active stimulation, engines can drain 10's of mA of current from the high voltage supplies V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS. HVGs may not be able to provide that amount of current instantly. Accordingly, many embodiments provide a solution by having high value (e.g., 10 μF-20 μF) storage capacitances at the output of the HVG. The benefits of using these high value capacitances is twofold. First, output voltage ripple is proportional to
(50)
hence it can be mitigated. Secondly, the voltage drop during the stimulation would be in order of several 10's of mV. Otherwise, a huge voltage drop could cause stimulator malfunction. Also, keeping V.sub.DD/V.sub.SS within a safe range can be required for correct BGR and current mirror operation.
(51) Apart from the necessity and benefits that introduction of external capacitances may bring into the design of neuromodulation systems, there are a few challenges that have to be considered. Medical-grade, ceramic SMD capacitors show capacitance degradation as the DC voltage across the capacitor increases, as illustrated in
(52)
where ESR=R.sub.pcb+R.sub.chip_wire+R.sub.cap denote the serial accumulated resistance, can reach several 100's of mV. Such a big ripple on supplies may be unacceptable and can cause the stability issues.
(53) An elegant solution for the above problem may be to use Integrated Passive Device (IPD) devices. These devices show no capacitance degradation over the DC voltage stress. Also, an IPD's negligible serial inductance introduces a very small voltage ripple.
(54) Measurement Results
(55) To demonstrate the functionality and performances of a neuromodulation systems in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, two different STIM/PM ICs, as illustrated in
(56) In several embodiments, High Voltage STIM switching matrices are designed for 64 electrodes and STIM matrix provides a complex spatial resolution. The stim IC can be integrated in HV-180 nm CMOS to support a large voltage, while the sense IC can be implemented in 40 nm CMOS technology for reduced area and power of digital circuits.
(57) A measurement setup in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
(58) To demonstrate the functionality of the NM unit, in-vitro measurements were conducted with a 64-electrode probe.
(59) Neuromodulation units may be designed and assembled for both versions of STIM/PM and SENSE ICs. The functionality of these two ICs can be supported by only a few passives—6 off-chip components are placed on the top side of the PCB. This unit may include stacked integrated IPDIA capacitors to further downsize the overall NM module. In many embodiments, the bottom side has the contacts for external connections—2 anti-phase AC power lines, 3-wire SPI interface, and 66 contacts for neural electrodes (1 ‘common’, 1 ‘reference’, and 64 targets). The overall NM capsule may be smaller than a US penny and occupies 552 mm.sup.3, while the inner volume where active electronics is placed may take 338 mm.sup.3−W=4.5 mm and L=22.5 mm, as illustrated in
(60) This NM unit is small in size, which makes a high-channel count, closed-loop neuromodulation possible. The low-profile NM PCB assembly can be housed in a small package for on-the-skull implantation. This scheme can minimize the recording interference and reduce power in the cables for the NM. The distributed architecture may allow a clinician to adjust the number of NM satellites without modifying the system design.
(61) In many embodiments, an advantage of this implantation scheme is the proximity of the sensors and stimulators to the electrode arrays, compared to the traditional approach where the pulse generator is in the chest area.
(62)
(63) Many embodiments of the neuromodulation system implant show superior form factor and performance compared to the prior art. The improved performance may be a result of highly optimized designs and a modular approach that combines the best of different CMOS technologies. It also provides a unique ability to rapidly customize systems with varying channel counts via heterogeneous “chiplet” system-in-a-package assembly.
(64) While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.