MAGNETICALLY-DRIVABLE MICROROBOT

Abstract

A method of making a magnetically-drivable microrobot that is suitable for carrying and delivering cells includes photo-curing a photo-curable material composition to form a body of the magnetically-drivable microrobot. The photo-curable material composition includes a degradable component, a structural component, a magnetic component, and a photo-curing facilitation composition including a photoinitiator component and a photosensitizer component.

Claims

1. A method of making a magnetically-drivable microrobot, the method comprising: photo-curing a photo-curable material composition to form a body of the magnetically-drivable microrobot; wherein the photo-curable material composition comprises: a degradable component; a structural component; a magnetic component; and a photo-curing facilitation composition comprising a photoinitiator component and a photosensitizer component.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the degradable component comprises poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) or like poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivatives.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the structural component comprises pentaerythritol triacrylate (PETA).

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the magnetic component comprises Fe3O4 particles.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the Fe3O4 particles comprise Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the photo-curing is performed selectively using lithography.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the photo-curing is performed selectively using 3D laser lithography or multiphoton lithography.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising coating or applying a photoacoustic imaging contrast agent on at least part of the body.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the contrast agent comprises gold.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming the photo-curable material composition by mixing the degradable component and the structural component based on a first ratio to form a first mixture, and mixing the first mixture with the magnetic component based on a second ratio to form a second mixture.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising determining a composition of the photo-curable material composition prior to the forming of the photo-curable material composition.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein determining the composition of the photo-curable material composition comprises determining the first and second ratios.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising mixing the photo-curable material composition prior to the photo-curing.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising developing the formed body after the photo-curing.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the body comprises a porous body with a three-dimensional structure having burr members.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the degradable component comprises poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and the structural component comprises pentaerythritol triacrylate (PETA); and wherein a ratio of vol % of PEGDA to vol % of PETA is about 3:1.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the photo-curing of the photo-curable material 3o composition forms bodies of a plurality of magnetically-drivable microrobots.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein adjacent bodies are overlapped.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the overlapped adjacent bodies are mechanically engaged.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the overlapped adjacent bodies are mechanically engaged without direct material connection.

21. The method of claim 1, further comprising attaching or loading cells to the body.

22. The method of claim 8, further comprising attaching or loading cells to the coating.

23. A magnetically-drivable microrobot, comprising: a body made by photo-curing of a photo-curable material composition, the photo-curable material composition includes: a degradable component; a structural component; a magnetic component; and a photo-curing facilitation composition comprising a photoinitiator component and a photosensitizer component.

24. The magnetically-drivable microrobot of claim 23, further comprising a contrast agent material or coating arranged on at least part of the body.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0027] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0028] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0029] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a method of making a magnetically-drivable microrobot in one embodiment of the invention;

[0030] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system for manipulating a magnetically-drivable microrobot made using the method of FIG. 1 in one embodiment of the invention;

[0031] FIG. 3 is a graph showing the degradation test results of the microrobots made from different ratios of PEGDA (vol %) to PETA (vol %);

[0032] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the mechanical test results of the microrobots made from different ratios of PEGDA (vol %) to PETA (vol %);

[0033] FIG. 5A is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 90 vol % PEGDA: 10 vol % PETA, showing that the microrobot structure is deformed and collapsed;

[0034] FIG. 5B is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 85 vol % PEGDA: 15 vol % PETA, showing that the microrobot grid is deformed and the burr is broken;

[0035] FIG. 5C is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 80 vol % PEGDA: 20 vol % PETA, showing that the burr is broken;

[0036] FIG. 5D is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 75 vol % PEGDA: 25 vol % PETA, showing that the microrobot is intact;

[0037] FIG. 5E is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 70 vol % PEGDA: 30 vol % PETA, showing that the microrobot is intact;

[0038] FIG. 5F is a scanning electron microscopic image of a microrobot made using 65 vol % PEGDA: 35 vol % PETA, showing that the microrobot is intact;

[0039] FIG. 6 is a graph showing the magnetic actuation capability of the microrobots made with different percentage of Fe3O4 nanoparticles;

[0040] FIG. 7A is a scanning electron microscopic image of microrobots made using 2.5 vol % Fe3O4 nanoparticles;

[0041] FIG. 7B is an enlarged scanning electron microscopic image of the microrobot in the dotted-line rectangle in FIG. 7A;

[0042] FIG. 7C is an enlarged scanning electron microscopic image of a section of the microrobot in FIG. 7B in the dotted-line rectangle, showing that the burr is missing;

[0043] FIG. 8 is a graph showing the fluorescence signal of the microrobots made using different ratios of PEGDA to PETA in NaOH;

[0044] FIG. 9 is a graph showing the fluorescence signal of the microrobots made using different ratios of PEGDA to PETA in PBS;

[0045] FIG. 10A is an image of the microrobot in NaOH initially;

[0046] FIG. 10B is an image of the microrobot of FIG. 10A after 2 hours;

[0047] FIG. 10C is an image of the microrobot of FIG. 10A after 3 hours;

[0048] FIG. 10D is an image of the microrobot of FIG. 10A after 7 hours;

[0049] FIG. 11A is an image of the microrobot in PBS initially;

[0050] FIG. 11B is an image of the microrobot of FIG. 11A after 20 days;

[0051] FIG. 12A is a confocal scan image showing a histological section of tissue implanted with a microrobot made using 75 vol % PEGDA and 25 vol % PETA at week 2;

[0052] FIG. 12B is fluorescence image of the histological section of tissue implanted with the microrobot of FIG. 12A;

[0053] FIG. 12C is a confocal scan image showing a histological section of tissue implanted with a microrobot made with too vol % PETA at week 2;

[0054] FIG. 12D is fluorescence image of the histological section of tissue implanted with the microrobot of FIG. 12C;

[0055] FIG. 13A is a confocal scan image showing a histological section of tissue implanted with a microrobot made with 75 vol % PEGDA and 25 vol % PETA at week 4;

[0056] FIG. 13B is fluorescence image of the histological section of tissue implanted with the microrobot of FIG. 13A;

[0057] FIG. 13C is a confocal scan image showing a histological section of tissue implanted with a microrobot made with too vol % PETA at week 4;

[0058] FIG. 13D is fluorescence image of the histological section of tissue implanted with the microrobot of FIG. 13C;

[0059] FIG. 14 is a graph showing the fluorescence intensity of the microrobots made with different ratios of PEGDA to PETA in vivo;

[0060] FIG. 15A is a graph showing the cell viability in different cell culture (MIHA, MSC, MNCC97L) with different concentrations of degradation products of the microrobots on Day 1;

[0061] FIG. 15B is a graph showing the cell viability in different cell culture (MIHA, MSC, MNCC97L) with different concentrations of degradation products of the microrobots on Day 3;

[0062] FIG. 15C is a graph showing the cell viability in different cell culture (MIHA, MSC, MNCC97L) with different concentrations of degradation products of the microrobots on Day 5;

[0063] FIG. 16A is a graph showing the comparison of the photoacoustic magnitudes of different numbers of 10 nm-gold-coated and uncoated microrobots;

[0064] FIG. 16B is a graph showing the comparison of the photoacoustic magnitudes of 10 nm-gold-coated and uncoated microrobots under different tissue thicknesses;

[0065] FIG. 17A is an ultrasonic image of the left lateral lobe pre-injected with 200 microrobots;

[0066] FIG. 17B is a photoacoustic image of the left lateral lobe in FIG. 17A, the arrow indicating the pre-injected 200 microrobots;

[0067] FIG. 17C is a merged ultrasonic-photoacoustic image of the left lateral lobe in FIG. 17A;

[0068] FIG. 18A is an ultrasonic image of the left lateral lobe without microrobots;

[0069] FIG. 18B is a photoacoustic image of the left lateral lobe in FIG. 18A, the arrow indicating the background signals;

[0070] FIG. 18C is a merged ultrasonic-photoacoustic image of the left lateral lobe in FIG. 18A;

[0071] FIG. 19A is a photoacoustic image of an in vivo navigation of a cell-loaded microrobot conducted in the inferior vena cava of a nude mice at position a;

[0072] FIG. 19B is a photoacoustic image of the in vivo navigation in FIG. 19A at position b;

[0073] FIG. 19C is a photoacoustic image of the in vivo navigation in FIG. 19A at position c; and

[0074] FIG. 20 is a graph showing the position errors of the cell-loaded microrobots at different positions in the inferior vena cava in FIGS. 19A-19C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0075] FIG. 1 shows a method 100 of making magnetically-drivable microrobots 10 for carrying and delivering cells in one embodiment of the invention. The microrobots may be loaded with cells or the like. In one exemplary application, the microrobots may be guided inside vascular tissues using real-time photoacoustic (PA) imaging and ultrasound (US) imaging technologies, during routing of the tissues, allowing detection of optical adsorption with high resolutions.

[0076] The microrobots 10 are fabricated using optimized photo-curable composite materials including a degradable component arranged to provide degradability of the microrobot, a mechanical or structural component arranged to provide mechanical strength or support of the microrobot, and a magnetic component arranged to provide magnetic actuation capability (that allows the microrobot to respond to magnetic manipulation). The composition of the microrobot materials can be optimized based on applications, in view of, among other factors, degradability, mechanical strength (for carrying cells, drugs, or the like), and magnetic actuation capability. The composition further includes a photo-curing facilitation composition including a photoinitiator and a photosensitizer that are used to crosslink the components in the composition. The degradable component may include a derivative of polyethylene glycol (PEG), such as poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), which is used in drug delivery and tissue engineering-based applications. The structural component may include a derivative of acrylate, such as pentaerythritol triacrylate (PETA). The magnetic component may include magnetic or ferromagnetic particles such as Fe3O4 particles, in particular Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The photoinitiator and photosensitizer may include parbenate and 2-isopropyl-9H-thioxanthen-9-one, respectively.

[0077] The method 100 of making the microrobots begins in step 102. In 102A of step 102, the degradable component, which is used as a material matrix, is first combined with the structural component in a first ratio to form a first mixture, and to provide mechanical strength to the microrobots. Then, in 102B of step 102, the magnetic component is mixed with the first mixture of the degradable component and the structural component in a second ratio to obtain a second mixture, to provide a material composition with magnetic actuation capability. The mixing in 102A and 102B of step 102 may be performed using a mixer or shaker. The composition of the photo-curable material composition, in particular the first and second ratios, may be determined or optimized before step 102, to achieve optimized degradability and mechanical strength depending on the required application. Specifically, the first ratio can be determined based on the structural integrity of burdening cell tensile forces. The second ratio can be determined based on the actuation capability requirements and fabrication constrains.

[0078] After step 102, in step 104, the optimized material composition is photo-cured using lithography, such as 3D laser lithography or multiphoton lithography, to define multiple microrobots. In the illustrated embodiment, multiple microrobots 10 are defined as separate microrobots without material connection.

[0079] Subsequently, in step 106, the photo-cured composition is developed to form multiple microrobots 10 for loading cells or the like. In the illustrated embodiment, the formed microrobots 10 include a porous body with a three-dimensional structure that is generally spherical and having multiple burr members. The burr members extend substantially orthogonally from an outer surface of the porous body.

[0080] In one embodiment, the method 100 may include coating or applying a contrast agent, e.g. gold, on at least part of the body formed. The contrast agent may be a photoacoustic imaging contrast agent that facilitates photoacoustic imaging or photoacoustic imaging based tracking of the body. The coating may have a thickness in the order of nanometers, e.g., 10 nm.

[0081] After step 106, in step 108, cells are loaded onto the microrobots 10 so that the cell-loaded microrobots can be applied to an environment to carry and/or deliver cells. The cells are loaded or attached to the body or to the coating of the photoacoustic imaging contrast agent. The cells may be loaded or attached between adjacent burr members of the same microrobot or different burr members of adjacent microrobots.

[0082] FIG. 2 shows a system 200 for manipulating magnetically-drivable microrobots 20 loaded with cells in a live mice. The magnetically-drivable microrobots 20 may be the ones made based on the method 100 in one embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, a clusters of cell-loaded microrobots are delivered into the blood vessel of the mice. The microrobots 20 are engineered with optically absorbing materials to ensure a high optical absorption coefficient and high contrast to hemoglobin molecules in the visible spectrum.

[0083] The system 200 includes a photoacoustic imaging apparatus having a probe 202 and an optical fiber 204 arranged to image the microrobots 20 in the blood vessel (e.g., inferior vena cava) of the mice. The system 200 also includes a sharp needle 206 and a catheter 208 covered with the needle 206 for piercing and delivering the cell-loaded microrobots 20 into the blood vessel. The system 200 further includes a magnetic field generator 210, formed by one or more coils in this embodiment, arranged to provide a magnetic field to interact with and hence move the microrobot 20 in the mice. The magnetic field generator 210 may be a gradient magnetic field generator. The photoacoustic image apparatus may be arranged to image the microrobot 20 in real time, e.g., dynamically or continuously, as the microrobot 20 is moved or otherwise manipulated by the magnetic field. As such, the movement of the magnetically-drivable microrobot 20 can be tracked by imaging. The system 200 may further comprise a controller (not shown) operably connected with the magnetic field generator 210 to control operation of the magnetic field generator 210 based on feedback from the photoacoustic imaging apparatus and/or a user input.

[0084] Fabrication of Magnetically-Drivable Microrobots

[0085] In one experimentation, a photo-curable material composition including PEGDA (Sigma, 437441), PETA (Sigma, 246794), magnetic nanoparticle solution (100 nm size, 260 mg/mL suspended in gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), customized by chemicell GmbH), photoinitiator (Parbenate, Easepi EDB, Curease Chemical, China), and photosensitizer (2-Isopropyl-9H-thioxanthen-9-one, Easepi ITX, Curease Chemical, China) was used to make the microrobots. Before forming the microrobots using lithography, the pre-polymer solution (photo-curable material composition) were mixed using a vortex shaker. The composite was then drop-casted on a clean glass substrate and loaded in Nanoscribe, a commercial two-photon direct writing system (GmbH, Germany) for structures written with a 63× oil immersion objective (numerical aperture of 1.4 from Zeiss). The substrate was then developed in toluene (Sigma, 179965) and isopropanol alcohol (IPA, Sigma, 67-63-0), and dried in fume hood via airflow.

[0086] Cells were then loaded onto the formed microrobots. The formed microrobots were sterilized using UV irradiation and treated in a plasma cleaner for 30 s. Human iPSC-MSC-GPx3 was trypsinized and re-suspended at a concentration of 10.sup.5 cells/mL. This cell solution was then drop-casted on the microrobots and incubated for 15 mins in a humidified incubator at 37° C. with 5% CO.sub.2 for cell attachment. Then the additional 2 ml culture medium was added. After overnight cultivation, the cells stably attached to the microrobots. The microrobots were dehydrated in a critical point dryer (LEICA EM CPD300), and the morphology of microrobot with cells were observed under SEM (FE-SEM, FEI Nova 450), as discussed in further detail below.

[0087] In addition, a cluster of microrobots was prepared for photoacoustic tomography (PAT) experiments. In this example, the microrobots were manufactured one after the other. In order to avoid the spread of microrobots, the manufactured microrobots had small overlap (e.g., mechanical engagement, with or without direct connection) with adjacent microrobots by the burr members, and the array of connected microrobots formed a square. In this example, a cluster of ten microrobots was established in four production lines: the first three production lines contained three microrobots, and the last production line contained only one microrobot.

[0088] Optimization of Photo-Curable Material Composition

[0089] To determine or optimize the photo-curable material composition (in particular the first and second ratios described with respect to the method 100 of FIG. 1) for specific applications, degradability and mechanical strength requirements of the microrobots are considered.

[0090] FIGS. 3 to 5F show the degradation and mechanical test results of the microrobots made from different ratios of PEGDA (vol %) and PETA (vol %). The tested ratios include 90:10, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100. During fabrication of the microrobots under test, the different ratios of materials were doped with same amount of Rhodamine B-PEG-Thiol (RB-PEG-SH).

[0091] For the degradation test, the fabricated microrobots were immersed in a PBS environment. At different time instants, the microrobot image was captured (Zeiss Fluorescence Microscope) and the fluorescence intensity of the microrobot was analyzed with the ImageJ software. From FIG. 3, it can be seen that the fluorescence intensity of microrobot with a high PEGDA ratio decays more rapidly, indicating the microrobot with high PEGDA ratio benefits its degradability.

[0092] For the mechanical test, the fabricated microrobots were tested in a Hysitron TI950 Dual-Head Nano Indentation System. The mechanical strengths of microrobots as determined are shown in FIG. 4, in which the inset shows the mechanical test of microrobot in 75 vol % PEGDA:25 vol % PETA. As seen from FIG. 4, the mechanical strength of the microrobot increases as the ratio of PETA increases, and the material with a higher PETA composition requires less laser power in microrobot fabrication. These indicate that a higher PETA composition could benefit the structural integrity of the microrobots.

[0093] To determine the minimal PETA composition required for microrobot fabrication, the materials with different ratio of PEGDA and PETA were tested based on the structural integrity. It was found that a minimal composition of 10 vol % PETA was required to form a properly structured microrobot.

[0094] The microrobots with different ratios of PEGDA and PETA were then further evaluated based on the mechanical strength for carrying mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). FIGS. 5A to 5F indicate that the microrobot with PETA lower than 25 vol % may collapse relatively easily after loading cells, and the microrobots with 25 vol % PETA or above may remain stable and intact when cells are loaded. In this example, it may be advantageous to use 75 vol % PEGDA and 25 vol % PETA in the composition of microrobot material, in order to provide optimal degradability and structural integrity.

[0095] FIGS. 6 to 7C illustrate the determination of the second ratio described with respect to the method 100 of FIG. 1, based on the magnetic actuation capability and fabrication constraint. Microrobots fabricated with 75:25 ratio of PEGDA (vol %) to PETA (col %), plus Fe3O4 nanoparticles at different ratios of 1 vol %, 1.5 vol %, and 2 vol %, were tested. It is shown that the microrobots could achieve an increased actuation speed as the ratio of the nanoparticles increases from 1 vol % to 2 vol %. In this example, the ratio of the magnetic component is limited to within 2 vol % as a higher ratio in the composition may reduce or block laser penetration, potentially making the microrobots defective.

[0096] FIGS. 7A to 7C show the microrobots fabricated with a 2.5 vol % magnetic content. As the excessive magnetic component in the composite blocked laser writing during photo-curing, defects were found in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Therefore, in one example, 2 vol % magnetic nanoparticles were doped with the microrobot material of 75 vol % PEGDA and 25 vol % PETA for microrobot magnetic actuation. In this example, the composition of 74 vol % PEGDA, 24 vol % PETA and 2 vol % Fe3O4 nanoparticles solution was used in view of the above experimental results.

[0097] Degradability and Biocompatibility of Magnetically-Driven Microrobots

[0098] The degradability and biocompatibility of the designed microrobots were evaluated. FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate the fluorescence signal of microrobots made of degradable 75 vol % PEGDA:25 vol % PETA hydrogel and hard-to-degrade 100 vol % PETA hydrogel in the NaOH solution and PBS environment, respectively. The result shows that the fluorescence intensity of the degradable 75 vol % PEGDA:25 vol % PETA microrobots decreased by 92% within 24 hours in the NaOH solution, while that of hard-to-degrade 100 vol % PETA microrobots decreases by only 13% (FIG. 8). In the PBS environment, the fluorescence intensity of the degradable microrobots decreased by 40% after two-week incubation, while that of hard-to-degrade microrobots remained almost unchanged (FIG. 9). These results demonstrate that the fabricated microrobots can be degraded by hydrolysis, and degradation in alkaline environments is much faster than degradation in PBS.

[0099] FIGS. 10A to 10D show the degradation of the microrobot in the NaOH solution and FIGS. 11A and 11B show the degradation of microrobot in the PBS environment. PEGDA-based hydrogel would undergo a bulk mode of degradation. In bulk degradation, no significant change occurs in the physical size of the polymer network until it is almost fully degraded, but the fraction of polymer remaining in the hydrogel decreases over time.

[0100] Local tissue environment, enzymatic oxidation, and macrophage activity may impact the hydrogel degradation. In vivo tests of microrobot degradability were performed in the subcutaneous (SC) tissue of nude mice. Degradable 75 vol % PEGDA:25 vol % PETA microrobots and hard-to-degrade 100 vol % PETA microrobots were implanted subcutaneously on the left and right flanks of each mice. All microrobots were manufactured using a prepolymer solution containing 1 mg/mL RB-PEG-SH and rinsed and dried before implantation. Mice were sacrificed at weeks 2 and 4. Skin fragments with a size of about 1×1 cm.sup.2 at the implantation regions were excised and fixed with a formaldehyde solution. The fixed skin tissues were then embedded in a cryomatrix frozen medium and cut vertically to a thickness of 50 μm using a cryostat.

[0101] FIGS. 12A to 13D show histological sections of tissue implanted with a microrobot. The confocal scan images show that the microrobot was not washed away. The fluorescence signal of rhodamine B was only present in or near the microrobot. There was no leakage of rhodamine B in a large area. The release process of rhodamine B is correlated with the degradation of the microrobot. The fluorescence signal of rhodamine B on the microrobot has been characterized. FIG. 14 shows that the fluorescence intensity of the degradable 75 vol % PEGDA:25 vol % PETA microrobot decreased by about 65% at 2 weeks after implantation, and 82% at 4 weeks after implantation. The hard-to-degrade 100 vol % PETA microrobot decreased by 19% and 30%, respectively. These experimental results confirmed the in vivo degradability of microrobots.

[0102] Considering that the degradation products of the microrobot will remain in the body for a certain period of time, a viability test was subsequently performed to examine the biocompatibility of the fully degraded products. MTT assays were performed with cells cultured in the medium supplemented with different concentrations of degradation products on Day 1, 3, and 5. FIGS. 15A to 15C show that even if 800 ppm degradation products were added to the medium (equivalent to degrading 10 k microrobots in 1 uL solution), the cell viability was not substantially impaired. The viability of all cell types was above 80% even under the ultrahigh concentration of degradation products.

[0103] In Vivo Imaging of Magnetically-Driven Microrobots

[0104] To facilitate in vivo experiments using the microrobots, real-time imaging of microrobots at depths from several millimeters to centimeters can be conducted. In one example, the microrobots were engineered and the PA tomography (PAT) was tailored for in vivo microrobotic imaging. The microrobot was engineered with optically absorbing materials to ensure a high optical absorption coefficient and high contrast to haemoglobin molecules in the visible spectrum. By tuning the optical excitation wavelengths, the contrast of microrobots in blood was optimized and the blood and microrobots were quantified simultaneously. To visualize the tissue environment, the co-registered PA and US images were acquired simultaneously.

[0105] In this example, to enhance the PA signal of microrobots and to improve the contrast of microrobots to blood, 1064 nm was chosen for in vivo imaging. The microrobots were coated with a 10 nm-thick layer of gold (photoacoustic imaging contrast agent) to further enhance the absorption while ensuring good biological compatibility. To deliver more therapeutic cells to the diseased site, a cluster (from several to hundreds) of microrobots were used in one treatment. The large number of microrobots increased the PA signal. FIG. 16A illustrates that the PA magnitude is positively correlated with the number of microrobots, both under the 1064 nm laser wavelength. Compared with the uncoated microrobots under the same excitation, the gold-coated microrobots generated a signal five times stronger.

[0106] To demonstrate microrobotic imaging in deep tissue, two clusters of microrobots were imaged in chicken tissues, as shown in FIG. 16B. One cluster consists of 10 gold-coated microrobots, and the other one consists of 10 uncoated microrobots. Compared with the uncoated microrobot cluster, the coated microrobot exhibited stronger PA signals under various tissue thicknesses. The gold-coated microrobot cluster can be clearly imaged at the depth of 2 cm, whereas the uncoated cluster could hardly be detected at the depth of 2 cm. This experiment shows that the engineered microrobot has good contrast in deep PA imaging.

[0107] Imaging of the microrobots was further tested in the mice liver. Two hundred microrobots were injected via the portal vein into the left lateral lobe (LLL), which were then harvested and fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA), and imaged with US and PAT. FIGS. 17A to 18C show the imaging results. The US images show the morphology of LLL, and the PA images show the absorption contrast of the microrobots against the liver tissue. The merged US and PA images show the position of the microrobot distribution in LLL. The LLL with 200 injected microrobots had a signal amplitude 2.8 times that of the control.

[0108] In Vivo Navigation of Magnetically-Driven Microrobots in Mice Model

[0109] In vivo navigation of the cell-loaded microrobots guided by PA imaging was conducted in the inferior vena cava of nude mice at a depth of 6 mm (male, 6 to 8 weeks). The set up was similar to that in FIG. 2. The microrobot cluster consists of five gold-plated microrobots. Using a sharp needle-covered catheter, a cluster of microrobots carrying cells was delivered into the inferior vena cava of nude mice. Guided by real-time PA and US imaging (20 frames per second per imaging mode), the microrobots inside the catheter were activated by using a gradient magnetic field in the vein. A proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller was used in motion control, and position feedback was obtained by visually processing PA images. During the microrobot navigation, two target positions were set and marked as b and c (FIGS. 19B and 19C, respectively). The cluster of microrobots with cells moved from the starting position a (FIG. 19A) to the target position b, and then from b to the target position c, with a total displacement of 5.1 mm. As shown in FIG. 20, the position error of the microrobot indicates that the microrobot with cells can accurately navigate the vascular environment to transport therapeutic cells.

[0110] The above embodiments of the invention have provided a method of making cell-loadable magnetically-drivable, and/or degradable microrobots that facilitate wireless and minimally invasive methods for precise treatment of diseases. In one example, the microrobots can be used for precise cell delivery in the living body of human or other animal, e.g., in the vascular tissues. The microrobots can be navigated and tracked by photoacoustic imaging in vivo for targeted therapy. The microrobots can be degraded after performing the tasks (e.g., delivering cells or drugs), in particular in vivo, with relatively few side effects. The above embodiments of the invention have also provided an imaging method for guiding movements of the microrobots in vivo or in vitro. The photoacoustic imaging can enable real-time navigation and provide images with high resolutions, in particular at millimeters to centimeters of tissues, potentially facilitating surgical and/or therapeutical applications of the microrobots.

[0111] It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. The described embodiments of the invention should therefore be considered in all respects as illustrative, not restrictive.

[0112] The illustrated method for making a microrobot can be used to make microrobots with different structures, shape, form, size, etc. Also, the illustrated microrobot may be manipulated in different environments using methods or systems not illustrated. For example, the method of making microrobots can be different from that illustrated. Different photo-curing techniques, including but not limited to lithography, may be applied to form the microrobots. The method may be used to form one or more microrobots. The photo-curable material composition may include one or more degradable components; one or more structural components; one or more magnetic component; and one or more photo-curing facilitation compositions comprising one or more photoinitiator components and one or more photosensitizer components. The degradable component need not be PEGDA. The structural component need not be PETA. The magnetic component need not be Fe3O4 particles, but can be other ferromagnetic or magnetic materials. Contrast agent may be coated on or applied to at least part of the body. The photo-curable material composition may be photo-cured using techniques other than lithography. Multiple microrobots may be formed (e.g. photo-cured and developed) one after another or substantially simultaneously. Adjacent bodies of the microrobots may be overlapped, e.g. mechanically engaged, with or without direct material connection. For example, the microrobot can be different from that illustrated. The microrobot may have a solid body instead of a porous body. The microrobot may have a non-spherical shape. The burr members on the body of the microrobot may have different orientations, forms, sizes, lengths, etc. In some embodiments, the body of the microrobot may not have any burr members on the body. In some embodiments, the body of the microrobot may include surface recessed portions. The microrobots may be used to carry and deliver cells, drugs, or the like. The illustrated method and system for manipulating the microrobots may be modified for different control applications. The illustrated method and system may be modified to be used other in vivo or in vitro environments. The system for manipulating the microrobots may include additional or alternative means (instead of the sharp needle and the catheter) for delivering the microrobots to or into the environment.