Profile parameter selection algorithm for electroporation
11229478 · 2022-01-25
Assignee
Inventors
- Brian T. Howard (Hugo, MN, US)
- Steven J. Fraasch (Maple Grove, MN, US)
- Mark T. Stewart (Lino Lakes, MN, US)
- John Vandanacker (Rockford, MN, US)
Cpc classification
A61B2018/1467
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B18/1492
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61N1/327
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B18/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
A method of determining a pulsed field ablation waveform parameter for creating a desired lesion characteristic in cardiac tissue. The method of provides an electrosurgical generator configured to deliver electroporation pulses, the generator configured to: load predetermined waveform parameters (y.sub.i); load predetermined modeling data (x.sub.i); accept entry of a user inputted desired lesion characteristic (u.sub.i); and determine at least one corresponding pulsed field ablation waveform parameter based on (u.sub.i), (y.sub.i); and (x.sub.i).
Claims
1. An electrosurgical generator configured to deliver pulsed field ablation pulses to electroporate cardiac tissue, the electrosurgical generator comprising: a processor having processing circuitry configured to: load predetermined waveform parameters (yi); load predetermined modeling data (xi); accept entry of a user inputted desired lesion characteristic (ui); and select at least one waveform parameter (y) from the loaded predetermined waveform parameters (yi), the selecting being based on a statistical significance of the waveform parameter (y) in determining the user inputted desired lesion characteristic (ui), the statistical significance being indicated from experimental modeling; determine at least one pulsed field ablation waveform parameter corresponding to the selected at least one waveform parameter (y), based on (ui) and (xi).
2. The generator of claim 1, wherein the generator is further configured to electrically couple with an electrosurgical device having a plurality of electrodes, the plurality of electrodes being configured to deliver electroporation pulses between an adjacent one of the plurality of electrodes.
3. The generator of claim 1, wherein the predetermined modeling data (xi) is a function of the predetermined waveforms parameters (yi) and the user inputted desired lesion characteristic (ui).
4. The generator of claim 1, wherein the electrosurgical generator is configured to electrically couple with an electrosurgical medical device having a plurality of electrodes configured to deliver electroporation pulses between adjacent electrodes of the plurality of electrodes, and wherein the waveform parameters (yi) further include at least one from the group consisting of a number of pulses, a duration of each pulse, a number of pulse trains, an applied voltage, and electrode polarity configuration.
5. The generator of claim 1, wherein the user inputted desired lesion characteristic (ui) includes at least one of lesion surface area, lesion width, and lesion length.
6. The generator of claim 5, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine whether an applied voltage amplitude is within a predetermined voltage threshold, and wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to reduce the applied voltage amplitude when the applied voltage amplitude is above the predetermined voltage threshold.
7. The generator of claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to optimize the determined at least one pulsed field ablation waveform parameter based on the modeling data (xi).
8. The generator of claim 1, wherein the modeling data (xi) depends at least in part on an arrangement of electrodes of a catheter driven by the generator.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) A more complete understanding of embodiments described herein, and the attendant advantages and features thereof, will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(6) Before describing in detail exemplary embodiments, it is noted that the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of apparatus components and processing steps related to a PFA waveform profile parameter selection based on an a desired lesion characteristic. Accordingly, the system and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
(7) Referring now to the drawings where like reference designators refer to like elements there is shown in
(8) The medical device 12 may include an elongate body 16 passable through a patient's vasculature and/or positionable proximate to a tissue region for diagnosis or treatment, such as a catheter, sheath, or intravascular introducer. The elongate body 16 may define a proximal portion 18 and a distal portion 20, and may further include one or more lumens disposed within the elongate body 16 thereby providing mechanical, electrical, and/or fluid communication between the proximal portion of the elongate body 16 and the distal portion of the elongate body 16. The distal portion 20 may generally define the one or more treatment region(s) of the medical device 12 that are operable to monitor, diagnose, and/or treat a portion of a patient. The treatment region(s) may have a variety of configurations to facilitate such operation. In the case of purely bipolar pulsed field delivery, distal portion 20 includes electrodes that form the bipolar configuration for energy delivery where energy passes between one or more electrodes and one or more different electrodes on the same electrode array. In an alternate configuration, a plurality of the electrodes 24 may serve as one pole while a second device containing one or more electrodes (not pictured) would be placed to serve as the opposing pole of the bipolar configuration. For example, as shown in
(9) The generator 14 may include processing circuitry including a first processor 17 in communication with one or more controllers and/or memories containing software modules containing instructions or algorithms to provide for the automated operation and performance of the features, sequences, calculations, or procedures described herein. The system 10 may further include three or more surface ECG electrodes 26 on the patient in communication with the generator 14 through the catheter electrode distribution system 13 to monitor the patient's cardiac activity for use in determining pulse train delivery timing at the desired portion of the cardiac cycle, for example, during the ventricular refractory period. In addition to monitoring, recording or otherwise conveying measurements or conditions within the medical device 12 or the ambient environment at the distal portion of the medical device 12, additional measurements may be made through connections to the multi-electrode catheter including for example temperature, electrode-tissue interface impedance, delivered charge, current, power, voltage, work, or the like in the generator 14 and/or the medical device 12. The surface ECG electrodes 26 may be in communication with the generator 14 for initiating or triggering one or more alerts or therapeutic deliveries during operation of the medical device 12. Additional neutral electrode patient ground patches (not pictured) may be employed to evaluate the desired bipolar electrical path impedance, as well as monitor and alert the operator upon detection of inappropriate and/or unsafe conditions. which include, for example, improper (either excessive or inadequate) delivery of charge, current, power, voltage and work performed by the plurality of electrodes 24; improper and/or excessive temperatures of the plurality of electrodes 24, improper electrode-tissue interface impedances; improper and/or inadvertent electrical connection to the patient prior to delivery of high voltage energy by delivering one or more low voltage test pulses to evaluate the integrity of the tissue electrical path.
(10) The generator 14 may include an electrical current or pulse generator having a plurality of output channels, with each channel coupled to an individual electrode of the plurality of electrodes 24 or multiple electrodes of the plurality of electrodes 24 of the medical device 12. The generator 14 may be operable in one or more modes of operation, including for example: (i) bipolar energy delivery between at least two electrodes 24 or electrically-conductive portions of the medical device 12 within a patient's body, (ii) monopolar or unipolar energy delivery to one or more of the electrodes or electrically-conductive portions on the medical device 12 within a patient's body and through either a second device within the body (not shown) or a patient return or ground electrode (not shown) spaced apart from the plurality of electrodes 24 of the medical device 12, such as on a patient's skin or on an auxiliary device positioned within the patient away from the medical device 12, for example, and (iii) a combination of the monopolar and bipolar modes.
(11) Referring now to
(12) Through experimental modeling, the following are examples of calculations to determine various lesion characteristics (x.sub.i) in myocardial tissue which function as the modeling data and parameters for the medical device 12, most exemplary for medical device 20 with distal portion 20 having a plurality of electrodes of a diameter of 1-2 mm, a length of 3-4 mm, and an inter-electrode spacing of 3-5 mm whereas the energy is passing between the positive and negative electrodes as designated in
Average(x.sub.i)Depth=0.276+0.001943Voltage−0.0650Pulse Width+0.01874Pulses+0.0980Trains+0.00186Pulse Width*Pulse Width−0.000070Pulses*Pulses.
Average(x.sub.i)Surface Width=−0.65+0.00617Voltage+0.1454Pulse Width+0.03167Pulses+0.1881Trains−0.000124Pulses*Pulses−0.000192Voltage*Pulse Width.
Average(x.sub.i)Depth(inter-electrode)=−6.40+0.01135Voltage+0.1471Pulse Width+0.02005Pulses+0.329Trains−0.000005Voltage*Voltage−0.000104Pulses*Pulses−0.01612Trains*Trains−0.000116Voltage*Pulse Width−0.00957Pulse Width*Trains+0.001306Pulses*Trains.
(13) Experimental modeling indicates certain of the waveform parameters (y) which are divided into variable (y.sub.k) which are statistically significant ablation variables in determining modeled lesion characteristics (x.sub.i) and thus are represented in the above models, and other waveform parameters are not statistically significant for a given characteristic, that may be set by other means such as safety considerations, and thus are preset as constant waveform parameters (y.sub.j) to either limit the amount of energy delivered, limit bubble production from the electrodes, limit to time of delivery, limit embolic loads, reduce unintended muscle stimulation, or a combination of each. In one embodiment, inter-pulse timing and inter-phase timing are parameters that are set as constants and cannot be modified by the user. Other parameters, for example, pulse width are set at values to minimize bubble formation at the electrodes 24. In particular, when the pulse width is set at between 1-6 μs and in an exemplary configuration 5 μs, bubble formation is minimized while maximizing lesion formation. Moreover, the number of pulses may also be set as a constant to achieve a maximized lesion depth as adding additional pulses may not reduce the existing tissue damage, but does contribute to unnecessary bubble, energy, time, and/or coagulation delivery. Thus, the number of pulses is set to provide the most efficacious use of the energy given other potential concerns. For example, the number of pulses may be set as a constant at between 30-140 pulses (120 pulses in an exemplary configuration) and may not be modified by the user. Thus, voltage and/or electric field and the number of pulse trains delivered are the remaining parameters that the model determines and optimizes as a function of the user inputs (u.sub.i). The voltage and the number of pulse trains delivered are identified as waveform parameters (y.sub.k) which may be optimized and determined based on the model. Moreover, the number of applications is also a factor that has been identified as contributing to lesion depth.
(14) In an exemplary configuration based on the parameters discussed above, for a single train delivery to achieve a given lesion depth, the following equation applies: Depth=f(Voltage)+C=A*Voltage+C±model error, where C is a function of (y.sub.k) and (y.sub.i) and depth is (u.sub.i). So in specifying the desired depth (u.sub.i), the model may set (for example) the voltage level of the delivery from reversing the determined relationship to, for example: Voltage delivered=(DepthDesired−C(+model error))/A; or stated more generally:
(y.sub.k)=f((y.sub.i),(u.sub.i), and (x.sub.i))
(15) The voltage level may be subject to a minimum and maximum achievable level as set by the generator 14 for, for example, safety precautions. So if the above relationship does not have a satisfactory solution (i.e. required depth is too large for the maximum allowable voltage), it could additionally specify the required number of deliveries (number of pulsed trains) to ensure the value is achieved or alert the user to unacceptable inputs. However, the model may assume a constant four pulse trains, with acceptable embolic loads, across a range of depths that correspond to different profiles, safety concerns, and a nominal dosing set. For example, the model assumes that the user would input a desired lesion depth between 1 mm and 8 mm, which correspondingly leads to the pre-set waveform parameters. The above model is also dependent on the medical device 12 and the arrangement of the plurality of electrodes 26 and is dependent on the type of tissue being treated, namely, cardiac tissue.
(16) The above model uses electroporation to non-encompassed tissue, effectively causing the electroporated region to be that volume projecting away from the electrodes 26 instead of between those electrodes 26. This results in well-defined and repeatable lesion regions, which is distinct from encompassed tissue treated by monopolar radio frequency (RF) or traditional electroporation procedures, which would have a much larger error in lesion depth calculations. Indeed, residual plot analysis of the model, as shown in
(17) It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present embodiments are not limited to what has been particularly shown and described herein above. In addition, unless mention was made above to the contrary, it should be noted that all of the accompanying drawings are not to scale. A variety of modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the scope of the application.