Hydrogen gas sensors based on nanoparticle-decorated, patterned carbon nanotube ropes

Abstract

Nanoparticle(NP)-decorated carbon nanotube (CNT) ropes used as sensing elements for hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) chemiresistors are described herein. The NP-decorated CNT rope sensors were prepared by dielectrophoretic deposition of a single semiconducting CNT rope followed by the electrodeposition of metal nanoparticles to highly disperse said nanoparticles on the CNT surfaces. The rope sensors produced a relative resistance change 20-30 times larger than what was observed at single, pure Pd nanowires. Thus, the rope sensors improved upon all H.sub.2 sensing metrics (speed, dynamic range, and limit-of-detection) relative to single Pd nanowires.

Claims

1. A hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) sensor (105) for sensing H.sub.2 gas in air, said H.sub.2 sensor (105) comprising: a. a supporting substrate (110); b. a carbon nanotube (CNT) rope (130) electrodeposited onto the supporting substrate (110); c. at least two metal electrodes (140) disposed on the CNT rope (130), wherein a portion of the CNT rope (130) is disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140); and d. metal nanoparticles (NPs) (135) electrodeposited onto the portion of the CNT rope (130) that is disposed between the two metal electrodes (140), wherein the metal NPs (135) have a mean particle diameter of about 4-9 nm, wherein said mean particle diameter size enables the H.sub.2 sensor (105) to detect H.sub.2 in air at an H.sub.2 concentration of at least 10 ppm.

2. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the metal NPs (135) comprise palladium, platinum, nickel, gold, or a combination thereof.

3. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the metal electrodes (140) comprise copper, silver, or gold.

4. The sensor of claim 1, wherein the metal electrodes (140) further comprises a chromium adhesive interlayer.

5. A hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) sensor (105) for sensing H.sub.2 gas in air, said H.sub.2 sensor (105) comprising: a. a supporting substrate (110); b. a carbon nanotube (CNT) rope (130) electrodeposited onto the supporting substrate (110); c. at least two metal electrodes (140) electrodeposited on the CNT rope (130), wherein a portion of the CNT rope (130) is disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140); and d. a photoresist layer (120) deposited on the two metal electrodes (140), CNT rope (130), and the supporting substrate (110); e. a window (150) formed through the photoresist layer (120) by lithographical patterning, wherein the window (150) exposes and isolates a portion of the CNT rope (130) disposed between the two metal electrodes (140); and metal nanoparticles (NPs) (135) electrodeposited onto the portion of the CNT rope (130) that is disposed between the two metal electrodes (140), wherein the metal NPs (135) have a mean particle diameter of about 4-10 nm, wherein said mean particle diameter size enables the H.sub.2 sensor (105) to detect H.sub.2 in air at an H.sub.2 concentration of at least 10 ppm.

6. A hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) sensor (105) for sensing H.sub.2 gas in air, said H.sub.2 sensor (105) comprising: a. a supporting substrate (110); b. a carbon nanotube (CNT) rope (130) electrodeposited onto the supporting substrate (110); c. at least two metal electrodes (140) electrodeposited on the CNT rope (130), wherein a portion of the CNT rope (130) is disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140); and d. a photoresist layer (120) deposited on the two metal electrodes (140), CNT rope (130), and the supporting substrate (110); e. a window (150) formed through the photoresist layer (120) by lithographical patterning, wherein the window (150) exposes and isolates a portion of the CNT rope (130) disposed between the two metal electrodes (140); and palladium nanoparticles (135) electrodeposited onto the portion of the CNT rope (130) that is exposed and isolated, wherein said electrodepositing the palladium nanoparticles (135) utilizes a pulse electrodeposition process comprising applying about 50-400 voltage pulses, each pulse having an applied potential of about −0.8 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and a pulse duration of about 0.1-0.5 second and being separated by about 1-2 second wait times, wherein said pulse electrodeposition process enables formation of the palladium nanoparticles (135) having a mean particle diameter of about 4-10 nm, and maximizes a density of the palladium nanoparticles (135) formed on the exposed and isolated portion of the CNT rope (130), thus producing an H.sub.2 sensor (105) capable of detecting H.sub.2 in air at an H.sub.2 concentration of at least 10 ppm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) This patent application contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

(2) The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:

(3) FIG. 1 shows a non-limiting embodiment of a process flow diagram for fabrication of a CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensor.

(4) FIGS. 2A-2E show non-limiting examples of Patterning of CNT ropes prepared by LPNE-templated dielectrophoresis. FIG. 2A shows current versus time for the dielectrophoretic deposition of CNT ropes at an LPNE-patterned template induced by a train of +20 V×0.10 s pulses separated in time by 1.0 s. FIG. 2B shows a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of an array of CNT ropes on glass patterned at 20 μm pitch using LPNE. FIG. 2C shows an SEM image of loops of CNT rope patterned at 100 μm pitch using LPNE. FIG. 2D is a higher magnification SEM image of a section of CNT rope 1.0-1.5 μm in width. FIG. 2E shows a Pd-CNT rope H2 sensor comprising a single CNT rope decorated with Pd nanoparticles (not visible in this image) and evaporated gold electrical contacts.

(5) FIGS. 3A-3D show data for electrodeposition of Pd NPs onto CNT ropes. FIG. 3A shows cyclic voltammograms at 20 mV/s in aqueous 0.2 mM PdCl2, 0.22 mM EDTA, 0.1 M KCl showing reduction of Pd.sup.2+ and concurrent H2 evolution. FIG. 3B show an example of a pulse program for applying a train of potential pulses of −0.80 V vs. SCE to electrodeposit Pd nanoparticles onto a single CNT rope. FIG. 3C shows current (blue trace) and charge (green trace) versus time for two deposition pulses illustrating the build-up of cathodic charge corresponding to both Pd reduction (Pd.sup.2++2e.sup.−.fwdarw.Pd.sup.0) and H.sub.3O.sup.+ reduction (H.sub.3O++2e.sup.− .fwdarw.H.sub.2+OH.sup.−).

(6) FIGS. 4A-4C show TEM characterization of electrodeposited Pd nanoparticles. FIG. 4A shows a low magnification TEM image of a CNT rope after the deposition of palladium nanoparticles (Q.sub.Pd=42° C.). Palladium nanoparticles are distributed across this entire image, with some of the largest seen as dark spots in the lower right corner of this image. FIG. 4B shows a high resolution TEM image of one of the nanoparticles in the blue circles that highlight approximately 40 Pd nanoparticles present in the region shown in the inset, which shows a higher magnification view of the region shown in FIG. 4A. FIG. 4C shows histograms of Pd nanoparticle diameters obtained from TEM analysis of either 2 or 3 sensors prepared using the indicated Q.sub.Pd

(7) FIG. 5 shows CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensor responses, for devices prepared using four QPd values, as indicated. H.sub.2 densing data for three [H.sub.2] concentration ranges, low, medium, and high, are shown: Left, 10 ppm<[H.sub.2]<100 ppm; Middle, 100 ppm<[H.sub.2]<1000 ppm, Right, 0.2%<[H.sub.a]<4%. R0 values, in the 80-90 kΩ range, are provided later in Table 2.

(8) FIGS. 6A-6C show hydrogen sensing metrics for CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors, and a comparison to a single Pd nanowire sensor (40 nm×100 nm×50 μm) operated at three temperatures. FIG. 6A shows ΔR/R.sub.0, the relative resistance change, versus [H.sub.2] in air for five sensors, as indicated. Parameters for the Pd-CNT rope H.sub.2 sensors are later summarized in Table 2. ΔR/R.sub.0 increases monotonically with Pd loading, and the mean Pd particle diameter. FIG. 6B shows a response time versus [H.sub.2] in air, and FIG. 6C shows a recovery time versus [H.sub.2] in air for the same five sensors described in FIG. 6A.

(9) FIGS. 7A-7B are comparisons of response (FIG. 7A) and recovery (FIG. 7B) for a single Pd nanowire H.sub.2 sensor (40 nm (h)×100 (w)×50 μm) and CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors with QPd values of 15 μC, 23 μC, 42 μC, 102 μC, as indicated. [H.sub.2]=1000 ppm. The horizontal dashed line indicates ΔR/R.sub.max=0.90.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(10) Following is a list of elements corresponding to a particular element referred to herein: 105 H.sub.2 sensor 110 substrate 115 metal electrode layer 120 photoresist 125 metal layer 130 carbon nanotube rope 135 metal nanoparticle 140 metal electrodes 150 window

(11) Referring now to FIG. 1, in some embodiments, the present invention features a method (100) of producing a metal nanoparticle (NP)-decorated carbon nanotube (CNT) rope. The method (100) may comprise electrodepositing a CNT rope (130) on a supporting substrate (110), followed by electrodepositing at least two metal electrodes (140) on the CNT rope (130) disposed on the supporting substrate (110) such that a portion of the CNT rope is disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140). In other embodiments, the method may further comprise depositing a photoresist layer (120) on the two metal electrodes (140), CNT rope (130), and the supporting substrate (110), and lithographically patterning the photoresist layer (120) to form a window (150) through the photoresist layer (120), thus exposing and isolating a portion of the CNT rope (130) disposed between the two metal electrodes (140). Metal nanoparticles (135) are then electrodeposited onto the CNT rope (130) exposed and isolated between the two metal electrodes (140), thus forming the metal NP-decorated CNT rope. The metal NPs (135) may comprise palladium, platinum, nickel, gold, or a combination thereof.

(12) In some embodiments, the electrodeposition of metal NPs may comprise a pulse electrodeposition process in which about 50-400 voltage pulses is applied, with each pulse having an applied potential of about −0.8 V vs. a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and a pulse duration of about 0.1-0.5 second and being separated by about 1-2 second wait times. Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, the pulse electrodeposition process can form metal NPs (135) having a mean particle diameter of about 4-10 nm. The process can also maximize a density of metal NPs formed on the exposed and isolated CNT rope (130).

(13) In other embodiments, the step of electrodepositing the CNT rope (130) on the supporting substrate (110) may comprise thermally evaporating a metal electrode layer (115) on the supporting substrate (110), depositing a photoresist layer (120) on the metal electrode layer (115), lithographically patterning the photoresist layer (120) to expose a portion of the metal electrode layer (115), and etching away the exposed metal electrode layer (115) to produce a horizontal trench beneath the photoresist layer (120). In some embodiments, the metal electrode layer (115) may be comprised of nickel. In some embodiments, the edges of the metal electrode layer within the horizontal trench can act as a working electrode. In other embodiments, a height of the horizontal trench may be equal to a thickness of the metal electrode layer.

(14) Continuing with the process of electrodepositing the CNT rope (130), single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) may be dielectrophoretically deposited by applying of a series of voltage pulses to generate the CNT rope (130) within the horizontal trench. In some embodiments, the series of voltage pulses comprises about 50-100 voltages pulses, each pulse having an amplitude of about 20 V applied for a duration of about 0.1-0.5 second, at a rate of one pulse for every 1-2 seconds. Lastly, the remaining photoresist layer (120) is removed and the remaining metal electrode layer (115) is etched away, thus producing the CNT rope (130) adhered to the supporting substrate (110).

(15) In some embodiments, the step of electrodepositing at least two metal electrodes (140) may comprise thermally evaporating at least one metal layer (125) onto the CNT rope (130) disposed on the supporting substrate (110), depositing a photoresist layer (120) on the metal layer (125), and lithographically patterning the photoresist layer (120) to form at least two electrode patterns on the metal layer (125) with a portion of the CNT rope disposed between the two electrode patterns. In some embodiments, the metal layer (125) may comprise copper, silver, or gold. In other embodiments, the metal layer (125) may further comprise an adhesive interlayer, such as chromium. Continuing with the step of electrodepositing the metal electrodes, uncovered portions of the metal layer (125) are etched away, and the electrode patterns of the remaining photoresist layer (120) are stripped from the remaining metal layer (125), thus forming the at least two metal electrodes (140) with the portion of the CNT rope disposed in-between. As used herein, electrodeposition of the metal electrodes (140) on the CNT rope (130) is intended to operatively connect the metal electrodes (140) to the CNT rope. In some embodiments, as shown in step 14 of FIG. 1, only a portion of each metal electrode (140) is required to be in direct contact with the CNT rope, provided that said contact enables a working electrical connection.

(16) In preferred embodiments, the metal NP-decorated carbon CNT ropes may be used as hydrogen gas (H.sub.2) sensors (105) for sensing H.sub.2 gas in air. For example, in one embodiment, the present invention may feature an H.sub.2 sensor comprising a supporting substrate (110), a carbon nanotube (CNT) rope (130) electrodeposited onto the supporting substrate (110), at least two metal electrodes (140) disposed on the CNT rope (130) with a portion of the CNT rope (130) disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140), and metal nanoparticles (NPs) (135) electrodeposited onto the portion of the CNT rope (130) that is disposed between the two metal electrodes (140). In some embodiments, the metal NPs (135) may have a mean particle diameter of about 4-10 nm. Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, it is believed that the mean particle diameter size advantageously allows for the H.sub.2 sensor (105) to detect H.sub.2 in air at an H.sub.2 concentration of at least 10 ppm. In some embodiments, the metal NPs (135) may comprise palladium, platinum, nickel, gold, or a combination thereof. In other embodiments, the metal electrodes (140) may be comprised of copper, silver, or gold. In further embodiments, the metal electrodes (140) may also include an adhesive interlayer, such as a chromium adhesive interlayer.

(17) According to some embodiments, the present invention also features a method of producing H.sub.2 gas sensor (105). In one aspect, the method may comprise electrodepositing a carbon nanotube (CNT) rope (130) on a supporting substrate (110), electrodepositing at least two metal electrodes (140) on the CNT rope (130) disposed on the supporting substrate (110) such that a portion of the CNT rope is disposed in-between the two metal electrodes (140), depositing a photoresist layer (120) on the two metal electrodes (140), CNT rope (130), and the supporting substrate (110), lithographically patterning the photoresist layer (120) to form a window (150) through the photoresist layer (120), thus exposing and isolating a portion of the CNT rope (130) disposed between the two metal electrodes (140), and electrodepositing metal nanoparticles (135) onto the CNT rope (130) exposed and isolated between the two metal electrodes (140), thus forming the H.sub.2 sensor (105) comprising a metal NP-decorated CNT rope. In further embodiments, metering devices, such as a source-meter in concert with a multimeter, may be operatively connected to the metal electrodes of the H.sub.2 gas sensor (105) for measuring sensor resistance. The sensor resistance may be indicative of H.sub.2 gas detection by the H.sub.2 gas sensor (105).

(18) In preferred embodiments, the step of electrodepositing the metal NPs employs a pulse electrodeposition process comprising applying about 50-400 voltage pulses, each pulse having an applied potential of about −0.8 V vs. SCE and a pulse duration of about 0.1-0.5 second and being separated by about 1-2 second wait times. Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, the pulse electrodeposition process can enable formation of metal NPs (135) having a mean particle diameter of about 4-10 nm, as well as maximizing a density of metal NPs formed on the exposed and isolated CNT rope (130), thus producing an H.sub.2 sensor (105) capable of detecting H.sub.2 in air at an H.sub.2 concentration of at least 10 ppm. In some embodiments, the steps of electrodepositing the carbon and electrodepositing the at least two metal electrodes (140) may be consistent with the procedures previously described herein.

EXAMPLE

(19) The following is an example of practicing the present invention presented for illustrative purposes only, and is not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Equivalents or substitutes are within the scope of the invention.

(20) Dielectrophoretic Deposition of Patterned Single CNT Ropes.

(21) Hydrogen sensors were prepared using a variant of the lithographically patterned nanowire electrodeposition (LPNE) method. Said LPNE method for patterning the electrodes and depositing carbon nanotube ropes is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,984, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference. Aqueous dispersions of SWNTs used for dielectrophoretic deposition containing 10 mg/L SWCNTs and 0.1 g/L sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) were first sonicated for 6 hours to disperse the SWCNTs. The procedures of dielectrophoretic deposition of SWNTs was carried out at LPNE-patterned nickel electrodes. The process for preparation of the LPNE templates are summarized in FIG. 1. In step 1, nickel films of 40 nm thickness were thermally evaporated onto pre-cleaned 3 in.×1 in. soda lime glasses, the thickness of nickel films was precisely measured by gold quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). In step 2, a positive photoresist layer was spin-coated at 2500 rmp for 80 seconds, and baked in a forced convection oven at 90° C. for 30 minutes. After the photoresist layer was cooled down to room temperature, it was mounted in contact with quartz mask on photolithographic mask alignment fixture. Then, in step 3, the photoresist layer was patterned by a flood exposure UV light source. The whole region of exposed photoresist was immersed in the photoresist developer for 20 seconds, rinsed with Millipore water, and air dried. In step 4, the sample was dipped in 0.8 M nitric acid for 5-10 minutes in order to etch away exposed nickel and also to produce a horizontal undercut beneath the protective photoresist layer. The height of this undercut equaled the thickness of the nickel evaporated in step 1.

(22) In step 5, the nickel edge within this horizontal trench was used as the working electrode for the dielectrophoretic deposition of SWNTs ropes. A 50 mL one-compartment two-electrode electrochemical cell was used for dielectrophoretic deposition of CNTs. The photolithographically patterned Ni electrode was immersed in aqueous solution of dispersed SWNTs while leaving the other edge of nickel out of the solution and connected to a sourcemeter. The counter electrode was a pre-cleaned 1 cm.sup.2 platinum foil. The dielectrophoretic deposition of CNT ropes was accomplished from an aqueous solution containing 10 mg/L SWCNTs and the 0.1 g/L sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) by the application of a series of voltage pulses having an amplitude of 20V, a duration of 0.1 s, at a rate of one pulse every two seconds. A total of 100 pulses were applied to generate the CNT ropes used in the devices described herein. When the deposition was finished, the remaining photoresist layer was completely dissolved and rinsed off by acetone, and then nickel layer was totally etched away by 0.8 M nitric acid, leaving one single SWNTs bundle adhering strongly to the glass surface. These processes are also comprised in step 5.

(23) As further shown in FIG. 1, subsequent steps were associated with the preparation of electrical contacts and the electrodeposition of Pd nanoparticles. In step 6, a layer of 2 nm Cr was thermally evaporated onto the as-made single SWNTs bundles, followed by the second thermal metal evaporation of 80 nm Au. Then, in step 7, a layer of photoresist was spin-coated and baked as previously described. After the photoresist layer was patterned, in steps 8 and 9, the uncovered part of Au/Cr layers was etched away, leaving patterned metallic layers on both sides of a 50 μm-long single bundle SWNTs.

(24) A typical current-time trace acquired during CNT deposition (FIG. 2A) shows an excess of anodic current consistent with the oxidation of water at +20V which occurred concurrently with the deposition of CNTs. The resulting CNT ropes consist of tangled assemblies of CNTs with a mean width of 1-2 μm (FIG. 2D). The rope width dispersion of these CNT ropes is evident from these images. A 50 μm length was electrically isolated using evaporated gold contacts on a 2 nm thickness adhesive chromium interlayer (FIG. 2E).

(25) Alignment of individual CNTs with the axis of the rope was generally obtained because this direction coincides with the direction of the electric field gradient in the system. Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, more disordered ropes have been obtained when the electric field gradient driving deposition is oriented orthogonal to the axis of the deposited rope. This is the deposition geometry operating in the present invention for the deposition of CNT ropes using LPNE. In some embodiments, the LPNE patterning of dielectrophoretically deposited CNT ropes can be used to create arrays of linear ropes, as shown in FIG. 2B, or ropes having more complex patterns, as shown in FIG. 2C.

(26) Electrochemical Decoration of Pd Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Hydrogen Gas Sensor.

(27) Referring to steps 10-13 of FIG. 1, Pd nanoparticles were electrodeposited on 50 μm long sections of CNT ropes isolated between the lithographically patterned gold contacts using a three-electrode electrochemical cell with saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE) and a platinum counter electrode. The aqueous plating solution contains 0.2 mM PdCl.sub.2, 0.22 mM EDTA and 0.1 M KCl. The Pd nanoparticles were electrodeposited by pulsing applied potential. Both Pd.sup.2+ reduction and hydrogen evolution can be expected to occur concurrently at this potential, and both are irreversible processes (FIG. 3A). Pd nanoparticles were prepared on CNT ropes in this solution by applying voltage pulses of −0.80 V (vs. SCE), 100 ms separated by 2 s wait times at 0.0 V (FIG. 3B). Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, this pulsed deposition scheme may maximize the number density of Pd nanoparticles produced on the CNT rope because each pulse exceeds an overpotential for palladium deposition, η.sub.Pd, while the wait time between pulses allows Pd.sup.2+ ions to diffusively back-fill into the CNT rope after each pulse. η.sub.Pd is the additional voltage beyond the Nernst potential for Pd2+ reduction that is required to form Pd.sup.0 nuclei on CNT surfaces. Since Pd nanoparticle nucleation is first order in [Pd.sup.2+], refreshing the Pd.sup.2+ can enable the highest possible nucleation rate, resulting in size similar nanoparticles with a diameter that is correlated with the total coulombic loading.

(28) Between 50 and 400 deposition pulses were applied to achieve the range of Q.sub.Pd values. Integration of the net cathodic charge yielded Q.sub.Pd which included contributions from Pd deposition and H.sub.2 evolution. A plot of current and integrated charge versus time (FIG. 3C) shows that cathodic currents exceed anodic currents, and the build-up of the total excess cathodic charge, Q.sub.Pd, can be tracked as a function of time (FIG. 3D). With successive pulses, the current amplitude also increases somewhat, consistent with the electrocatalysis of both H.sub.2 evolution and Pd.sup.2+ reduction by the Pd NPs. This autocatalysis is also observed in the cyclic voltammograms shown in FIG. 3A that show increasing peak currents on three successive voltammetric scans. Because the Pd2+ reduction current is augmented by H.sub.2 evolution, the measured Q.sub.Pd provides an upper limit on the actual Pd loading onto the CNT rope. Q.sub.Pd values of 15° C. to 102° C. were investigated herein.

(29) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).

(30) Scanning electron micrographs were acquired by using a FEI Magellan 400 XHR system. Energy dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) images were acquired by the same SEM system with an EDS detector. Acceleration voltages of incident electron beams ranged from 1 kV to 5 kV, and probe currents ranged from 1.6 pA to 0.4 nA. All the SEM specimens were mounted on stainless stubs and held by copper clips.

(31) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

(32) Transmission electron micrographs were acquired by using high resolution mode of a Philip CM-20 system operating at 200 kV acceleration voltage. Carbon nanotubes bundles with Pd nanoparticles were held by 3 mm diameter amorphous carbon-coated copper TEM grids.

(33) Hydrogen Sensing.

(34) CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors were mounted in a sealed flow cell equipped with two input ports—one for pre-mixed hydrogen/air, the other for air balance. The resistance of sensors was measured in situ as sensors were exposed to pulses of hydrogen gas at predetermined mixing ratios. Sensor resistance measurement was accomplished using a source-meter in concert with a multimeter. Flow controllers were used to control gas flow rates and to create pre-mixed hydrogen in air at predetermined mixing ratios. A pair of switching valves provided the means for switching between air balance and pre-mixed hydrogen/air pulses. These were controlled using a National Instruments interface in conjunction with a computer. The gas composition, pulse parameters, and data acquisition were programmed and controlled using Labview. All hydrogen sensing experiments were carried out at ambient laboratory temperature (about 20° C.) at a total gas flow rate of 1000 sccm.

(35) Referring to FIG. 4A, electrodeposited Pd nanoparticles distributed on the CNT sidewalls were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Low magnification TEM images show tangles of CNTs within the rope. A few larger Pd NPs can be seen in this image on the lower right hand side, but most of the image appears to show none. However at higher magnification, it is apparent that very small, sub-6 nm diameter Pd NPs are distributed throughout the CNT rope. In the 120 nm×120 nm region shown in yellow in FIG. 4A, for example, about 40 Pd NPs can be located and are highlighted with blue circles in the inset of FIG. 4B. At a still higher magnification of FIG. 4B, an individual Pd NP is revealed at lattice resolution. Using TEM image data, histograms of Pd NPs were compiled as a function of the total deposition charge, Q.sub.Pd, as shown in FIG. 4C. The mean diameters of Pd NPs ranged from 4.5 (±1) nm for Q.sub.Pd=15 μC, to 5.8 (±3) nm for Q.sub.Pd=102 μC. The relative standard deviation of the diameter, RSD.sub.dia, was in the range from 22% to 52% for these Pd NP distributions (Table 2). Compared with prior research in which Pd has been electrodeposited or vapor deposited onto CNT assemblies (Table 1), the pulsed plating method employed here yielded smaller NPs that are also more narrowly distributed in diameter. Without wishing to limit the invention to a particular theory or mechanism, the enhanced performance of the CNT@PdNP H2 sensors, as described below, may be attributed to the small mean Pd NP diameter, the absence of larger Pd NPs in these distributions, and the cleanliness inherent to the electrodeposition process, which does not require the stabilization of Pd colloids by a ligand layer.

(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Performance Metrics for Resistance-Based Hydrogen Sensors Operating in Air. Sensing Sensor Sensing T.sub.resp:T.sub.rec.sup.b @[H.sub.2] LOD.sub.H.sub.2.sup.c Element.sup.a Type Range (s) (ppm) (ppm) Ref Pd@SWCNTs ChemFET 200-1000 ppm 300:500 1000 200 22 Pd@SWCNTs ChemFET 25-2000 ppm 160:500 1000 25 21 Pd@rGO ChemFET 1-100 ppm  50:100 50 1 36 Pd@rGO Chemiresistor 20-1000 ppm  300:1500 1000 20 20 Pt/SnO.sub.2@rGO Chemiresistor 5000 ppm-3% 70:40 10000 5000 37 Pd@Carbon nw Chemiresistor 10-500 ppm 200:800 500 10 38 Pd/Ni@SWCNTs Chemiresistor 200 ppm-1.6% 300:500 2000 200 25 Pd/Pt@MWCNTs Chemiresistor 400 ppm-4% 150:200 1000 400 39 Pd@DWCNTs Chemiresistor 500 ppm-3% 180:220 1000 500 40 Pd@SWCNTs Chemiresistor 30 ppm-1% 280:300 1000 30 41 Pd@SWCNTs Chemiresistor 100 ppm-2%  950:3300 1000 100 42 Pt s-nw Chemiresistor 10 ppm-4%  180:1300 1000 10 43 Pd s-nw Chemiresistor 500 ppm-4% 435:445 1000 500 8 Pt@Pd s-nw Chemiresistor 500 ppm-4% 264:120 2000 500 8 Pd@SWCNTs Chemiresistor 10 ppm-4% 62:72 1000 <10 Present Invention .sup.aAbbreviations: SWCNT = single walled carbon nanotubes, rGO = reduced graphene oxide, nw = nanowire, DWCNT = double walled carbon nanotubes, s-nw = single nanowire. .sup.bT.sub.resp, T.sub.rec are response time (R.sub.initial to 0.90R.sub.max) and recovery time (R.sub.max to 0.10R.sub.max) respectively. .sup.cLOD.sub.H: Limit-of-detection for hydrogen.

(37) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Parameters for Palladium Nanoparticle-Decorated CNT Rope (Pd-CNT Rope) Hydrogen Sensors. Mean Pd Q.sub.Pd.sup.a Number of NP dia. R.sub.0.sup.b T.sub.resp:T.sub.rec.sup.c (ΔR/R.sub.0).sub.1000 ppm.sup.d (μC) Sensors (nm) (kΩ) (s:s) (%) 15 (± 1) 3 4.5 (± 0.8) 91 62:72 21 (± 2) 23 (± 1) 3 5.1 (± 0.9) 89 106:100 31 (± 1) 42 (± 1) 2 5.3 (± 1.3) 86 135:118 59 (± 5) 102 (± 3)  2 5.8 (± 2.8) 80 200:182 78 (± 2) .sup.aTotal electrodeposition charge for Pd, inclusive of H2 evolution. .sup.bInitial resistance in air. .sup.cT.sub.resp, T.sub.rec are response time (R.sub.0 to 0.90R.sub.max where R.sub.max is the steady-state resistance measured at 1000 ppm) and recovery time (R.sub.max to 0.10R.sub.max), respectively. .sup.dRelative resistance change, ΔR/R.sub.0, observed upon exposure to [H.sub.2] = 1000 ppm in air.

(38) Four sets of CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors, distinguished based upon the value of Q.sub.Pd, were tested. These four sensors had Q.sub.Pd ranging from 15 μC to 102 μC, corresponding to mean Pd NP diameters of 4.5 nm to 5.8 nm (FIG. 3C). Referring to FIG. 5, the response of each sensor was evaluated across a H.sub.2 concentration of 10 ppm to 40,000 ppm (4%) at room temperature in air. CNT ropes that were not decorated with Pd NPs showed no detectable response to H.sub.2 at any concentration in this range (c.f. middle panel, black trace). All Pd CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors produced a prompt, reversible increase in resistance, ΔR, upon exposure to H.sub.2. ΔR were normalized by the initial resistance, R.sub.0, to obtain a dimensionless signal, ΔR/R.sub.0. The amplitude of ΔR/R.sub.0 is striking because it is significantly larger than what is seen for single Pd nanowire sensors, which constitute some of the fastest and most sensitive H.sub.2 sensors known so far. A comparison with a Pd nanowire with lateral dimensions of 40 nm×100 nm shown in FIG. 6A reveals, for example, that ΔR/R.sub.0 is 30 times higher for the least sensitive CNT@PdNP (Q.sub.Pd=15 μC) at 1000 ppm. If the Pd nanowire is heated to accelerate response and recovery to H.sub.2 exposure, then the disparity is even larger because the signal amplitude is decreased (FIG. 6A). All four CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors were able to detect H.sub.2 at 10 ppm with a signal-to-noise of at least 10 (FIG. 5, left panel) while a Pd nanowire produced a LOD.sub.H2 of 400 ppm with a signal-to-noise ratio of 2.8. Thus, and without wishing to be bound by theory, it may be concluded that the CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors were much more sensitive than Pd nanowires, producing significantly lower LOD.sub.H2 and expanded dynamic range for the detection of [H.sub.2]. Sensing metrics and Pd NP statistics are both summarized in Table 2.

(39) For CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors, Q.sub.Pd influences sensor performance in two ways: First, the amplitude of the relative resistance change, ΔR/R.sub.0, increases with Q.sub.Pd. Q.sub.Pd=102 μC sensors produced ΔR/R.sub.0 values that are 6-8 times as high as those seen for Q.sub.Pd=15 μC sensors across this entire [H.sub.2] range; Second, response and recovery times improve (decrease) with decreasing Q.sub.Pd across the concentration range tested (FIG. 6B, 6C). As shown in FIG. 7B, the effect of Pd NP diameter is strongest on recovery. Again, CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors are significantly faster than Pd nanowires operating at room temperature. The influence of Q.sub.Pd on sensor speed is most evident in the lowest H.sub.2 concentrations (FIG. 5, left). For Q.sub.Pd of 23 μC, 42 μC, and 102 μC, ΔR/R.sub.0 does not reach a steady-state, time-invariant value on the time scale of the 700 s exposures. A time-invariant response is seen for Q.sub.Pd=15 μC sensors because of the more rapid response and recovery of ΔR/R.sub.0. Since even Q.sub.Pd=15 μC CNT@PdNP sensors have an abundance of signal-to-noise and can readily detect 10 ppm, these sensors out-perform the three with larger Q.sub.Pd for the detection of H.sub.2.

(40) It has been described herein novel H.sub.2 sensors operating across a broad dynamic range of 3.5 orders of magnitude and having a limit-of-detection of <10 ppm and the ability to produce analytically useful response and recovery speeds even at H.sub.2 concentrations below 100 ppm. The capabilities of the present invention eclipse those of single palladium nanowires operating at any single temperature. It has also been demonstrated the ability to produce CNT@PdNP H.sub.2 sensors with reproducible and controllable properties using the processes disclosed herein.

(41) As used herein, the term “about” refers to plus or minus 10% of the referenced number.

(42) The disclosures of the following U.S. patents are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein: U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,984.

(43) Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Each reference cited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

(44) Although there has been shown and described the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made thereto which do not exceed the scope of the appended claims. Therefore, the scope of the invention is only to be limited by the following claims. Reference numbers recited in the claims are exemplary and for ease of review by the patent office only, and are not limiting in any way. In some embodiments, the figures presented in this patent application are drawn to scale, including the angles, ratios of dimensions, etc. In some embodiments, the figures are representative only and the claims are not limited by the dimensions of the figures. In some embodiments, descriptions of the inventions described herein using the phrase “comprising” includes embodiments that could be described as “consisting of”, and as such the written description requirement for claiming one or more embodiments of the present invention using the phrase “consisting of” is met.

(45) The reference numbers recited in the below claims are solely for ease of examination of this patent application, and are exemplary, and are not intended in any way to limit the scope of the claims to the particular features having the corresponding reference numbers in the drawings.

REFERENCES

(46) 1. Buttner, W. J.; Post, M. B.; Burgess, R.; Rivkin, C. An Overview of Hydrogen Safety Sensors and Requirements. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 2462-2470. 2. Rivkin, C.; Blake, C.; Burgess, R.; Buttner, W. J.; Post, M. B. A National Set of Hydrogen Codes and Standards for the United States. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 2736-2741. 3. Hübert, T.; Boon-Brett, L.; Black, G.; Banach, U. Hydrogen Sensors—a Review. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2011, 157, 329-352. 4. Korotcenkov, G.; Han, S. D.; Stetter, J. R. Review of Electrochemical Hydrogen Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 1402-1433. 5. Cheng, P.; Han, P.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Chai, Y. Magnesium Inference Screw Supports Early Graft Incorporation with Inhibition of Graft Degradation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 2-12. 6. Windhagen, H.; Radtke, K.; Weizbauer, A.; Diekmann, J.; Noll, Y.; Kreimeyer, U.; Schavan, R.; Stukenborg-Colsman, C.; Waizy, H. Biodegradable Magnesium-based Screw Clinically Equivalent to Titanium Screw in Hallux Valgus Surgery: Short Term Results of the First Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Pilot Study. Biomed. Eng. Online 2013, 12, 1. 7. Hughes, R. C.; Schubert, W. K. Thin-films of Pd/Ni Alloys for Detetion of High Hydrogen Concentrations. J. Appl. Phys. 1992, 71, 542-544. 8. Li, X. W.; Liu, Y.; Hemminger, J. C.; Penner, R. M. Catalytically Activated Palladium@Platinum Nanowires for Accelerated Hydrogen Gas Detection. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3215-3225. 9. Yang, F.; Taggart, D.; Penner, R. Joule Heating a Palladium Nanowire Sensor for Accelerated Response and Recovery to Hydrogen Gas. Small 2010, 6, 1422-1429. 10. Yang, F.; Kung, S.-C.; Cheng, M.; Hemminger, J. C.; Penner, R. M. Smaller is Faster and More Sensitive: The Effect of Wire Size on the Detection of Hydrogen by Single Palladium Nanowires. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5233-5244. 11. Yang, F.; Taggart, D. K.; Penner, R. M. Fast, Sensitive Hydrogen Gas Detection Using Single Palladium Nanowires That Resist Fracture. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 2177-2182. 12. Zeng, X.; Latimer, M.; Xiao, Z.; Panuganti, S.; Welp, U.; Kwok, W.; Xu, T. Hydrogen Gas Sensing with Networks of Ultrasmall Palladium Nanowires Formed on Filtration Membranes. Nano Lett. 2010, 11, 262-268. 13. Offermans, P.; Tong, H. D.; van Rijn, C. J. M.; Merken, P.; Brongersma, S. H.; Crego-Calama, M. Ultralow-power Hydrogen Sensing with Single Palladium Nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 223110. 14. Collins, P. G.; Bradley, K.; Ishigami, M.; Zettl, A. Extreme Oxygen Sensitivity of Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes. Science 2000, 287, 1801-1804. 15. Liu, R.; Ding, H.; Lin, J.; Shen, F.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, T. Fabrication of Platinum-decorated Singlewalled Carbon Nanotube Based Hydrogen Sensors by Aerosol Jet Printing. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 505301. 16. Kumar, M. K.; Ramaprabhu, S. Nanostructured Pt Functionlized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotub Based Hydrogen Sensor. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11291-11298. 17. Kaniyoor, A.; Jafri, R. I.; Arockiadoss, T.; Ramaprabhu, S. Nanostructured Pt Decorated Graphene and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube Based Room Temperature Hydrogen Gas Sensor. Nanoscale 2009, 1, 382-386. 18. Khalap, V. R.; Sheps, T.; Kane, A. A.; Collins, P. G. Hydrogen Sensing and Sensitivity of Palladium-decorated Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes with Defects. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 896-901. 19. Wang, J.; Singh, B.; Park, J.-H.; Rathi, S.; Lee, Maeng, S.; Joh, Lee, C.-H.; Kim, G.-H. Dielectrophoresis of Graphene Oxide Nanostructures for Hydrogen Gas Sensor at Room Temperature. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2014, 194, 296-302. 20. Chung, M. G.; Kim, D. H.; Seo, D. K.; Kim, T.; Im, H. U.; Lee, H. M.; Yoo, J. B.; Hong, S. H.; Kang, T. J.; Kim, Y. H. Flexible Hydrogen Sensors Using Graphene with Palladium Nanoparticle Decoration. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2012, 169, 387-392. 21. Zhang, M. L.; Brooks, L. L.; Chartuprayoon, N.; Bosze, W.; Choa, Y. H.; Myung, N. V. Palladium/Single-walled Carbon Nanotube Back-to-back Schottky Contact-based Hydrogen Sensors and Their Sensing Mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 319-326. 22. Choi, B.; Lee, D.; Ahn, J. H.; Yoon, J.; Lee, J.; Jeon, M.; Kim, D. M.; Kim, D. H.; Park, I.; Choi, Y. K. et al. Investigation of Optimal Hydrogen Sensing Performance in Semiconducting Carbon Nanotube Network Transistors with Palladium Electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, DOI: 10.1063/1.4935610. 23. Dhall, S.; Jaggi, N.; Nathawat, R. Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Based Hydrogen Gas Sensor. Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. 2013, 201, 321-327. 24. Lee, J.-H.; Kang, W.-S.; Najeeb, C. K.; Choi, B.-S., Choi, S.-W.; Lee, H. J.; Lee, S. S.; Kim, J.-H. A Hydrogen Gas Sensor Using Single-walled Carbon Nanotube Langmuir-Blodgett Films Decorated with Palladium Nanoparticles. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2013, 188, 169-175. 25. Lin, T. C.; Huang, B. R. Palladium Nanoparticles Modified Carbon Nanotube/Nickel Composite Rods (Pd/CNT/Ni) for Hydrogen Sensing. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2012, 162, 108-113. 26. Pohl, H. A. Theoritical Aspects of Dielectrophoretic Deposition and Separation of Particles. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 1968, 115, 155C-161C. 27. Xiang, C.; Yang, Y.; Penner, R. M. Cheating the Diffraction Limit: Electrodeposited Nanowires Patterned by Photolithography. Chem. Comm. 2009, 859-873. 28. Xiang, C.; Kung, S. C.; Taggart, D.; Yang, F.; Thompson, M. A.; Guell, A. G.; Yang, Y.; Penner, R. M. Lithographically Patterned Nanowire Electrodeposition: A Method for Patterning Electrically Continuous Metal Nanowires on Dielectrics. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1939-1949. 29. Menke, E. J.; Thompson, M. A.; Xiang, C.; Yang, L. C.; Penner, R. M. Lithographically Patterned Nanowire Electrodeposition. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 914-919. 30. Krupke, R.; Hennrich, F.; Weber, H.; Kappes, M.; v. Löhneysen, H. Simultaneous Deposition of Metallic Bundles of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes Using AC-dielectrophoresis. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1019-1023. 31. Suehiro, J.; Zhou, G.; Hara, M. Fabrication of a Carbon Nanotube-based Gas Sensor Using Dielectrophoresis and Its Application for Ammonia Detection by Impedance Spectroscopy. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, L109. 32. Shekhar, S.; Stokes, P.; Khondaker, S. I. Ultrahigh Density Alignment of Carbon Nanotube Arrays by Dielectrophoresis. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1739-1746. 33. Stokes, P.; Khondaker, S. I. High Quality Solution Processed Carbon Nanotube Transistors Assembled by Dielectrophoresis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 083110. 34. Monica, A.; Papadakis, S.; Osiander, R.; Paranjape, M. Wafer-level Assembly of Carbon Nanotube Networks Using Dielectrophoresis. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 085303. 35. Fan, Y.; Goldsmith, B. R.; Collins, P. G. Identifying and Counting Point Defects in Carbon Nanotubes. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 906-911. 36. Lee, J. S.; Oh, J.; Jun, J.; Jang, J. Wireless Hydrogen Smart Sensor Based on Pt/Graphene-Immobilized Radio-Frequency Identification Tag. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7783-7790. 37. Russo, P. A.; Donato, N.; Leonardi, S. G.; Baek, S.; Conte, D. E.; Neri, G.; Pinna, N. Room-Temperature Hydrogen Sensing with Heteronanostructures Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Tin Oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51, 11053-11057. 38. Lim, Y.; Lee, Y.; Heo, Shin, H. Highly Sensitive Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on a Suspended Palladium/Carbon Nanowire Fabricated via Batch Microfabrication Processes. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2015, 210, 218-224. 39. Randeniya, L. K.; Martin, P. J.; Bendavid, A. Detection of Hydrogen Using Multi-walled Carbon-nanotube Yarns Coated with Nanocrystalline Pd and Pd/Pt Layered Structures. Carbon 2012, 50, 1786-1792. 40. Rumiche, F.; Wang, H. H.; Indacochea, J. E. Development of a Fast-Response/High-sensitivity Double Wall Carbon Nanotube Nanostructured Hydrogen Sensor. Sensor Actuat. B—Chem. 2012, 163, 97-106. 41. Sun, Y. G.; Wang, H. H. High-performance, Flexible Hydrogen Sensors That Use Carbon Nanotubes Decorated with Palladium Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2818-2823. 42. Mubeen, S.; Zhang, T.; Yoo, B.; Deshusses, M. A.; Myung, N. V. Palladium Nanoparticles Decorated Single-walled Carbon Nanotube Hydrogen Sensor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 6321-6327. 43. Yang, F.; Donavan, K. C.; Kung, S.-C., Penner, R. M. The Surface Scattering-based Detection of Hydrogen in Air Using a Platinum Nanowire. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2924-2930.