DOPED SODIUM ANODE, BATTERY HAVING A DOPED SODIUM ANODE, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Abstract

An anode of a battery comprises sodium metal, and a dopant, in the sodium metal. The anode has a thickness of at most 80 .Math.m, and the dopant is a metal with an electronegativity greater than sodium. A battery includes an anode, an anode charge collecting element in contact with the anode, a cathode, a cathode charge collecting element in contact with the cathode, an electrolyte in contact with the anode and the cathode, and a housing, enclosing the anode, anode charge colleting element, cathode, cathode charge collecting element and electrolyte. The anode in the battery comprises sodium metal doped with a dopant, and the dopant is present in an amount of 0.01 to 1.0 atomic percent.

Claims

1. An anode, comprising: sodium metal, and a dopant, in the sodium metal, wherein the anode has a thickness of at most 450 .Math.m, and the dopant is a metal with an electronegativity greater than sodium.

2. A method of making the anode of claim 1, comprising: melting sodium metal, introducing a dopant metal into the sodium metal to form molten doped sodium metal, solidifying the doped sodium metal, and forming the doped sodium metal into a foil having a thickness of at most 450 .Math.m.

3. A battery comprising: an anode, an anode charge collecting element in contact with the anode, a cathode, a cathode charge collecting element in contact with the cathode, an electrolyte in contact with the anode and the cathode, and a housing, enclosing the anode, anode charge colleting element, cathode, cathode charge collecting element and electrolyte, wherein the anode comprises sodium metal doped with a dopant, and the dopant is present in an amount of 0.01 to 1.0 atomic percent.

4. A method of generating electrical power with the battery of claim 3, comprising: connecting the anode and cathode of the battery to an external load to complete a circuit.

5. The anode of claim 1, wherein the dopant is present in an amount of 0.01 to 2.0 atomic percent.

6. The anode of claim 1, wherein the dopant is present in an amount of at most 1.0 atomic percent.

7. The anode of claim 1, wherein the dopant is present in an amount of 0.1 to 0.3 atomic percent.

8. The anode of claim 1, wherein the anode has a thickness of at most 30 .Math.m.

9. The anode of claim 1, wherein the dopant comprises at least one metal selected from the group consisting of: antimony, indium, lead, bismuth, thallium, and tin.

10. The anode of claim 1, wherein the dopant comprises tin.

11. The anode of claim 1, wherein the anode passes the resistance stability test.

12. The anode of claim 1, wherein the anode has a body centered cubic crystal structure.

13. The battery of claim 3, further comprising a separator in the housing.

14. The battery of claim 3, wherein the electrolyte is liquid.

15. (canceled)

16. The battery of claim 3, wherein the electrolyte comprises a salt, selected from the group consisting of: NaPFs, NaBF.sub.4, NaClO.sub.4, and mixtures thereof, and a solvent, selected from the group consisting of carbonates, ethers and mixtures thereof.

17. (canceled)

18. The battery of claim 3, wherein the anode charge collecting element and the cathode charge collecting element comprise a material independently selected from the group consisting of: copper, aluminum, steel and combinations thereof.

19. The anode of claim 1, wherein the anode has a thickness of at most 15 .Math.m.

20. The battery of claim 3, wherein the salt comprises NaPF.sub.6, the solvent comprises ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate, and the cathode comprises Mo.sub.6S.sub.8.

21. The battery of claim 3, wherein the battery retains at least 70% capacity after 800 cycles.

22. A method of making the battery of claim 3, wherein the battery is assembled in dry air.

23. (canceled)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] FIG. 1A schematic illustration of the dopant structure.

[0018] FIG. 1B is a phase diagram of Sn - Na.

[0019] FIG. 2 shows a battery having a cathode, anode, and separator.

[0020] FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of a sodium ion battery.

[0021] FIG. 4 schematic illustration of sodium batteries incorporating doped sodium electrodes.

[0022] FIG. 5 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na anode.

[0023] FIG. 6 is a graph of X-ray diffraction pattern of undoped Na and 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na.

[0024] FIG. 7A is a photograph of a doped Na electrode after 7 days of exposure in dry air.

[0025] FIG. 7B is a photograph of an undoped Na electrode after 7 days of exposure in dry air.

[0026] FIG. 7C is an energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDS) of a doped Na electrode after 7 days of exposure in dry air.

[0027] FIG. 7D is an energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDS) of an undoped Na electrode after 7 days of exposure in dry air.

[0028] FIG. 8A is a scanning electron microscope image of doped Na after 2 days of exposure in dry air.

[0029] FIG. 8B is a scanning electron microscope image of undoped Na after 2 days of exposure in dry air.

[0030] FIG. 9 is a graph comparing the charge-transfer resistance of doped and undoped Na after different days of exposure in dry air.

[0031] FIG. 10 is a graph of voltage profiles of symmetric coin cells assembled from undoped Na and 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na, cycled at 0.5 mA cm.sup.-2 and for 30 minutes each cycle.

[0032] FIG. 11 is a graph of voltage profiles of symmetric coin cells assembled from undoped Na and 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na, cycled at 0.5 mA cm.sup.-2 and for 1 hour each cycle.

[0033] FIG. 12 is a graph showing the cycling stability of prototype Na batteries assembled with Na anodes with different concentrations of Sn doping.

[0034] FIG. 13A is a SEM image of doped Na after cycling in full cells.

[0035] FIG. 13B is a SEM image of undoped Na after cycling in full cells.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] Despite the great progress in protecting sodium metal, there has been little effort on modulating the inherent physicochemical properties of metallic Na, which fundamentally limits the performance improvements. It is therefore of great interest and practical significance to explore approaches specifically designed to manipulate the fundamental behavior of Na metal. The addition of dopants as trace impurities is a powerful approach for altering the electrical or optical properties of a substrate, and has been widely demonstrated in fields such as solid-state electronics and lasers. The present invention describes anodes of sodium metal doped with trace amounts of a dopant, such as antimony, indium, lead, bismuth, thallium, or tin. The doped metal exhibits enhanced chemical stability and much better electrochemical reactivity. The dopant atoms are atomically dispersed in the Na crystal (FIGS. 1). The dopants have higher electronegativity than sodium atoms and strongly attract electrons in their vicinity, which increases the work function and reduces the reactivity of Na metal, leading to doped electrodes that are more stable in dry air. The dopant atoms have stronger binding with Na atoms and guide uniform Na plating, which fundamentally mitigate growth of unsafe dendrites. The combination of these benefits promoted generation of much thinner but stronger SEI layers during cycling in carbonate electrolytes, and enabled high-capacity and durable battery cycling both in symmetric cells and in full cells.

[0037] FIG. 1A illustrates the crystal structure of a doped sodium anode, 100 comprising sodium metal, 102 and a dopant, 104. FIG. 1B illustrates a Sn-Na phase diagram, the Sn doped Na electrodes can be synthesized by adding less than 1.0 atomic percent of Sn to molten Na, followed by rapid quenching, typically by pouring the molten mixture on a large stainless-steel plate at room temperature.

[0038] The dopant may be any metal that has an electronegativity greater than the electronegativity of sodium. The dopant may be beryllium, magnesium, aluminum, calcium, scandium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, nickel, cobalt, copper, zinc, gallium, germanium, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, cadmium, indium, tin, antimony, lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium, hafnium, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, osmium, iridium, platinum, gold, mercury, lead, bismuth, actinium, protactinium, thorium, neptunium, uranium, americium, plutonium, and curium. Preferably the dopant is antimony, indium, lead, bismuth, thallium, or tin, most preferably tin.

[0039] The anode of the present invention includes sodium metal doped with a dopant. The dopant may be present in an amount of 0.01 - 2.0 atomic percent, including 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9. Preferably the dopant is present in an amount of 0.05 - 0.5 atomic percent. Preferably, the dopant does not form intermetallic phases, and is present interstitially or replaces a sodium atom in the sodium crystal structure.

[0040] The doped sodium may be pressed into foils with a thickness of 1 to 450 .Math.m. Preferably the foil has a thickness of less than 80 .Math.m, including 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 .Math.m. Most preferably, the foil has a thickness of at most 30 .Math.m.

[0041] Preferably the doped anode is stable in dry air. The surface corrosion of doped and undoped electrodes in dry air may be measured by measuring the R.sub.ct (charge transfer resistance) of doped and undoped sodium anodes. The doped anode preferably passes the resistance stability test which requires the doped anode to have a resistance, measured after 7 days of exposure in dry air, that is ⅒ or less than the resistance of an undoped sodium anode, when the resistance of the anodes is measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis of symmetric coin cells assembled with the doped and undoped sodium anodes with 1.0 M NaPF.sub.6 in ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate (EC/PC) as the electrolyte (1:1 volume).

[0042] Optionally, the anode may be incorporated into a battery, having a cathode, electrolytes and a housing. The battery may also include charge collecting elements on the anode and cathode to gather or distribute the electrons. The charge collecting elements may be connected to an external circuit that is optionally connected to a load or to a recharging source.

[0043] FIG. 2 illustrates a battery, 200. The battery has an anode, 202 and a cathode, 204. The anode and cathode are rolled up, and a separator, 206, is between the cathode and anode. The battery has a positive terminal, 208 and a negative terminal 210. The battery is enclosed in a housing, 212. FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of a battery, 300. The battery has a cathode, 302, illustrated as thin film strips, attached to a cathode charge collecting element, 304. The anode, 306 is attached to an anode charge collecting element, 305. A separator, 308 is positioned between the anode and cathode. The electrolyte, 310 is in contact with the anode and cathode, and allow for the movement of ions, 312 between the anode and cathode. FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic of a battery cell, 400. The battery has an anode, 402, a cathode, 404, and an electrolyte, 410. The anode includes sodium, 406 and a dopant, 408.

[0044] In a sodium-ion battery, the sodium ions move from the anode to the cathode during discharge and in the opposite direction during recharge. The electrolyte carries positively charged sodium ions from the anode to the cathode and vice versa through the separator. The movement of the sodium ions creates free electrons in the anode which creates a charge at the anode current collecting element. The electrical current then flows from the current collector on the cathode, through a load (device being powered), to the current collecting element on the anode. When the battery is being recharged the electrons and ions flow in the opposite directions.

[0045] Preferably the battery maintains a capacity of at least 50% of the battery’s initial capacity after 200 to 1000 cycles. The battery may retain a capacity of 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% and 100% of the battery’s initial capacity after 200 cycles. Most preferably the battery maintains a capacity of at least 70% of the initial capacity for 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340, 360, 380, 400, 420, 440, 460, 480, 500, 520, 540, 560, 580, 600, 620, 640, 660, 680, 700, 720, 740, 760, 780 or 800 cycles.

[0046] The cathode material may be an oxide, such as sodium cobalt oxide, sodium manganese oxide, sodium nickel manganese oxide (NaNi.sub.xMn.sub.1-xO.sub.2 (x is between 0 and 1)), sodium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, sodium iron managanese oxide, sodium iron phosphate, sodium manganese phosphate, sodium vanadium phosphate, Na.sub.⅔Fe.sub.½Mn.sub.½O.sub.2 oxide, mixed P3/P2/O3-type Na.sub.0.76Mn.sub.0.5Ni.sub.0.3Fe.sub.0.1Mg.sub.0.1O.sub.2 oxide, or O3-type NaNi.sub.¼Na.sub.⅙Mn.sub.2/12Ti.sub.4/12Sn.sub.1/12O.sub.2 oxide. The cathode may include Mo.sub.6S.sub.8, which is a very stable cathode material. Prussian Blue Analogues (PBAs) may also be desirable with sodium cathode. PBAs include rhombohedral Na.sub.xMn[Fe(CN).sub.6], Na.sub.xCo[Fe(CN).sub.6] and rhombohedral Prussian white Na.sub.xFe[Fe(CN).sub.6].Math.0.18(9)H.sub.2O (x is in the range of 0 to 10) (U.S. Pat. No. 9,099,718 and Brant et al., “Selective Control of Composition in Prussian White for Enhanced Material Properties”, Chemistry of Materials, Vo. 31, No. 18, pp. 7203-7211 (2019)). The cathodes of Komaba et al. “P2-type Na.sub.x[Fe.sub.½Mn.sub.½]O.sub.2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries” Nature Materials, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 512-517 (2012) may also be used.

[0047] Other cathode materials of interest are sulfur and oxygen. Sodium-sulfur and sodium-oxygen batteries have advantages over sodium-ion cells because of their higher energy density and reduced cost from the use of sulfur. Sulfur has low conductivity, so the sulfur cathodes may also be paired with a highly conductive material to improve the conductivity. A carbon coating may be used to provide the missing electroconductivity. Sulfur based electrodes include copolymerized sulfur, sulfur-graphene oxide, and sulfur/sodium-sulfide.

[0048] Separators are preferred components in liquid electrolyte batteries. In the case of a liquid electrolyte, the separator is a porous material that is soaked with the electrolyte and holds it in place. The separator needs to be an electronic insulator while having minimal electrolyte resistance, maximum mechanical stability, and chemical resistance to degradation in the highly electrochemically active environment. In addition, the separator often has a safety feature, called “thermal shutdown”, which at elevated temperatures, melts or closes its pores to shut down the sodium-ion transport without losing its mechanical stability. Separators are either synthesized in sheets and assembled with the electrodes or deposited onto one electrode in situ. A separator generally includes a polymeric membrane forming a microporous layer. The separator may be made from nonwoven fibers, such as cotton, nylon, polyesters, glass; polymer films, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, poly (tetrafluoroethylene), polyvinyl chloride; ceramic; and naturally occurring substances, such as rubber, asbestos, or wood. The separator materials described in Arora, P. et al., Battery Separators Chemical Reviews 2004 104 (10), pg. 4419-4462 may also be used.

[0049] The electrolyte provides a medium for the transport of the sodium ions from the cathode to the anode and vice versa. Types of electrolytes include liquid, polymer, and solid-state electrolytes. Liquid electrolytes in sodium-ion batteries include salts, such as NaFSI, NaTFSI, NaPF.sub.6, NaBF.sub.4, and NaClO.sub.4, and a solvent, such as ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, dimethoxyethane, diglyme, triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, and tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether or mixtures thereof. The selection of the electrolyte may be influenced by the selection of the cathode material. One skilled in the art would select an appropriate electrolyte, an appropriate electrolyte volume, and an appropriate electrolyte concentration based on the cathode material, separator material, anode material, and cell design. The concentration of the electrolyte may be 0.1 M to 10.0 M, including 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0 M. Preferably the concentration of the electrolyte is 0.5-2.0 M. Preferably the electrolyte is NaPF.sub.6 in ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (EC/DMC) or NaPF.sub.6 in ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate (EC/PC). The ratio of the ethylene carbonate to propylene carbonate is preferably 1:1 by volume.

[0050] The electrolyte may be a solid or semi solid such as a ceramic. Solid electrolytes avoid the risk of leaks, and a separator is not necessary as the solid electrolyte prevents contact between the anode and the cathode. Solid ceramic electrolytes are mostly sodium metal oxides or sulfides. Common ceramic electrolytes are sodium super ion conductors (NASICON), β″-Al.sub.2O.sub.3 solid electrolyte (BASE), or sodium aluminum titanium phosphate (“NATP”). The solid electrolytes described in Wang, et al., “Development of solid-state electrolytes for sodium-ion battery-A short review”, Vol. 1, pp. 91-100 (2019) may also be used.

[0051] The current collecting element collects the electrons from the anode during discharge, prior to the electrons entering the external circuit. The current collecting element on the cathode will distribute the electrons to the cathode material. During recharging the electrons move in the opposite direction. The current collecting elements may comprise aluminum, copper, steel, or other conductive materials. The charge collecting elements include flexible carbon felts, porous carbon and silver nanowire meshes, which may provide a “host” for the sodium.

[0052] The housing encloses the battery and prevents the electrolyte for leaking. The housing may comprise metal or plastics. The housing may be rigid or flexible. Flexible housing materials allows for expansion of the cell during recharging, or for expansion caused by gas formation inside the battery. The battery structures and manufacturing techniques described in Schroder et al., “Comparatively assessing different shapes of litihium-ion battery cells”, ScienceDirect Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 8, pg. 104 - 111 (2017) may also be used.

[0053] The battery shape and design may be selected from various shapes to optimize the battery and avoid overheating, increase energy density, or reduce self-discharge. Common battery designs include small cylindrical (solid body without terminals, such as those used in older laptop batteries), button cells, prismatic cells, large cylindrical (solid body with large threaded terminals), pouch (soft, flat body, such as those used in cell phones and newer laptops; also referred to as Na-ion polymer or sodium polymer batteries), and rigid plastic case with large threaded terminals (such as in electric vehicles).

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Materials Synthesis:

[0054] This example focuses on Sn as the dopant, but the same principle can be used to produce Sb, In, Pb, Bi, Tl, etc. doped Na electrodes as long as the dopant metal is soluble in molten Na. The atomic concentration of Sn can be varied from 0.01% to 1% to ensure complete solvation without formation of crystalline compounds, as determined from the Sn-Na phase diagrams (FIG. 1B). The doping was performed inside an argon-filled glovebox where the oxygen and moisture levels were both < 0.5 ppm. Typically, 2.0 g Na metal (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to a 10 ml crucible, which was slowly heated to 200° C. using a heating mantle. An appropriate amount of Sn foil was then added and it generally dissolved in molten Na within few seconds. The molten mixture was maintained at 200° C. for 2 hours to ensure complete solvation of Sn. The molten mixture was quenched to room temperature and the doped Na was obtained (FIG. 5). The solidified Sn-doped Na lump was pressed into foils with the thickness of 400, 80 or 30 .Math.m using a rolling press. These foils were cut into 16 mm discs for investigation of their physicochemical properties and electrochemical behavior. The undoped Na electrodes were prepared using the identical procedure without addition of dopants to ensure the results are comparable.

Electrochemical Measurements:

[0055] All battery studies were performed using type 2025 coin cells assembled in an Ar-filled glovebox (FIG. 4). Cyclic voltammograms were recorded using a CH Instruments potentiostat. Battery cycling behavior was evaluated using Neware model CT-4008 battery analyzers. Electrochemical impedance spectra were acquired at room temperature with the frequency range of 0.02 Hz to 100 kHz. The symmetric coin cells were assembled using Na metal anodes of identical composition and the electrolyte was 1.0 M NaPF.sub.6 in ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate (EC/PC, 1:1 vol). The electrolyte volumes were 70 .Math.l unless otherwise noted. The full cells were assembled with the very stable Mo.sub.6S.sub.8 cathodes (FIG. 4). The Mo.sub.6S.sub.8 was coated on Al foils with an area capacity of ~1.5 mAh cm.sup.-2, which was punched into discs and vacuum dried overnight at 75° C. prior to use.

Results:

[0056] FIG. 6 compares the X-ray diffraction patterns of undoped and 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na metal electrode. Both electrodes exhibited diffraction peaks that can be indexed exclusively to the body-centered cubic (BCC) structure of metallic Na and no crystalline intermetallic Na-Sn compounds were identified. The enhanced (200) diffraction peak is an important feature for the doped Na electrode, this can be contributed by the selective occupancies of Sn dopant on the vacant face-centered sites in Na crystal structure as shown in FIG. 1A and/or preferred crystallographic orientation as a result of Sn doping.

[0057] The surface stability of Na electrodes with and without Sn-doping in dry air where the relative humidity was <5% was compared. The undoped Na electrodes exhibited typical aggressive chemical reactivity and generated greyish tarnishing layers almost immediately (FIGS. 7A, 7B, 8A and 8B). The 0.2 atomic % Sn doped Na, on the other hand, exhibited significantly improved stability and remained shiny for several days. The surface of doped Na electrode remained flat and dense whereas undoped Na developed significant porosity with widespread corrosion pits (FIGS. 8A and 8B). In addition, the impacts of surface corrosion on the electrochemical activities (Na.sup.+/Na redox kinetics) was evaluated. This was done by EIS analysis of symmetric coin cells assembled with either undoped or doped Na electrodes after different days of exposure in dry air. The results are compared in FIG. 9 and reveal that the R.sub.ct (charge-transfer resistance) of Sn doped Na electrodes increased slightly after 7 days of exposure (51 to 110 Ω cm.sup.-2), which is dramatically better than the more than 20 increases in R.sub.ct for undoped Na electrodes within only two days. These results imply significantly improved dry-air stability of Na metal as a result of Sn doping, which can enable their direct integrations in the dry room based industrial manufacturing facilities without costly surface protection treatments.

[0058] The stability of doped Na electrodes in batteries was first evaluated using symmetric coin cell configuration, which was assembled using two Na electrodes with identical composition. These batteries were cycled at either 0.5 mA cm.sup.-2 or 4.0 mA cm.sup.-2 at a capacity of 2.0 mAh cm.sup.-2 for each cycle. The Sn doped Na electrodes exhibited outstanding stability under both testing conditions (FIGS. 10-12). The overpotentials associated with Na plating and stripping remained relatively flat throughout testing, suggesting uniform Na plating without substantial perturbance in surface architectures. Although some random abnormal voltage spikes were indeed observed, such phenomenon was mostly associated with depletion of surface Na-ions under high currents and was generally disappeared shortly. The undoped Na anodes, on the other hand, exhibited substantial voltage fluctuations with large spikes, which are characteristic of uncontrollable growth of mossy inactive surface layers. In addition, the cell also exhibited failures of rapidly increased overpotential due to consumption of electrolytes after ~100 hours for the testing at 4.0 mA cm.sup.-2 due to the unstable nature of undoped Na in carbonate electrolyte. In contrast, the doped Na electrode didn’t exhibit such failure until 600 hours of cycling under the same condition, and therefore, the Sn-doped anode exhibited approximately six times improved durability.

[0059] In addition to symmetric cells, the improved stability of doped Na electrodes was also confirmed in Na metal full cells. These full cells were assembled with a prototype Mo.sub.6S.sub.8 cathode (with a real capacity of 1.5 mAh cm.sup.-2). Mo.sub.6S.sub.8 was chosen for this demonstration because it is a very stable material and any observed degradation can be assigned to failures on the anode side (undoped Na vs. doped Na). Na electrodes with different concentrations of Sn dopant were prepared and examined, and the results are compared in FIG. 12. The capacity of batteries equipped with undoped Na anode decayed to less than 50% of the initial capacity after 500 cycles, which is typical for undoped Na due to failures at the Na metal side and the formation of inactive mossy Na over cycles. Notably, all batteries equipped with doped Na exhibited significantly improved stability compared with undoped Na. The overall capacity retention after 1000 cycles was ~ 70%. The best stability was observed for batteries equipped with the 0.2 atomic % Sn doped anode, where a remarkable retention of ~ 80% was observed after 1000 cycles.

[0060] The cycled batteries were then disassembled and the sodium anodes were analyzed using scanning electron microscope (FIGS. 13A and 13B). The surface of Sn-doped anode remained relatively flat without much porous architectures. The undoped Na anode, on the other hand, exhibited significant porous and mossy structures, causing the battery to fail within few hundred cycles.

REFERENCES

[0061] 1. Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Kintner-Meyer, M. C. W.; Lu, X.; Choi, D.; Lemmon, J. P.; Liu, J., Electrochemical Energy Storage for Green Grid. Chemical Reviews 2011, 111 (5), 3577-3613.

[0062] 2. Luo, C.; Shen, T.; Ji, H.; Huang, D.; Liu, J.; Ke, B.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yan, C., Mechanically Robust Gel Polymer Electrolyte for an Ultrastable Sodium Metal Battery. Small 2020, 16 (2), 1906208.

[0063] 3. Chi, S.-S.; Qi, X.-G.; Hu, Y.-S.; Fan, L.-Z., 3D Flexible Carbon Felt Host for Highly Stable Sodium Metal Anodes. Advanced Energy Materials 2018, 8 (15), 1702764.

[0064] 4. Lu, K.; Gao, S.; Li, G.; Kaelin, J.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, Y., Regulating Interfacial Na-lon Flux via Artificial Layers with Fast Ionic Conductivity for Stable and High-Rate Na Metal Batteries. ACS Materials Letters 2019, 1.

[0065] 5. Lee, B.; Paek, E.; Mitlin, D.; Lee, S. W., Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth. Chemical Reviews 2019, 119 (8), 5416-5460.

[0066] 6. Cao, R.; Mishra, K.; Li, X.; Qian, J.; Engelhard, M. H.; Bowden, M. E.; Han, K. S.; Mueller, K. T.; Henderson, W. A.; Zhang, J.-G., Enabling room temperature sodium metal batteries. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 825-830.

[0067] 7. Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Jie, Y.; Lang, S.; Song, J.; Lei, Z.; Wang, S.; Ren, X.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Cao, R.; Zhang, G.; Jiao, S., Stable Sodium Metal Batteries via Manipulation of Electrolyte Solvation Structure. Small Methods 2020, 4 (5), 1900856.

[0068] 8. Gu, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Z.; Wei, J.; Zhou, Z., Highly reversible alloying/dealloying behavior of SnSb nanoparticles incorporated into N-rich porous carbon nanowires for ultra-stable Na storage. Energy Storage Materials 2019, 21, 203-209.

[0069] 9. Shi, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, H., High-Performance Sodium Metal Anodes Enabled by a Bifunctional Potassium Salt. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2018, 57 (29), 9069-9072.

[0070] 10. Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.; Cha, A.; Kang, S.; Wi, T.; Kang, S. J.; Lee, H.-W.; Choi, N.-S., Fluoroethylene Carbonate-Based Electrolyte with 1 M Sodium Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide Enables High-Performance Sodium Metal Electrodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2018, 10 (17), 15270-15280.

[0071] 11. Zheng, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, W.; Song, J.; Engelhard, M. H.; Zhang, J.-G., Extremely Stable Sodium Metal Batteries Enabled by Localized High-Concentration Electrolytes. ACS Energy Letters 2018, 3 (2), 315-321.

[0072] 12. Wang, S.; Cai, W.; Sun, Z.; Huang, F.; Jie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Peng, B.; Cao, R.; Zhang, G.; Jiao, S., Stable cycling of Na metal anodes in a carbonate electrolyte. Chemical Communications 2019, 55 (95), 14375-14378.

[0073] 13. Yu, Q.; Lu, Q.; Qi, X.; Zhao, S.; He, Y.-B.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Zhou, D.; Hu, Y.-S.; Yang, Q.-H.; Kang, F.; Li, B., Liquid electrolyte immobilized in compact polymer matrix for stable sodium metal anodes. Energy Storage Materials 2019, 23, 610-616.

[0074] 14. Luo, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Hu, X.; Matios, E.; Lu, X.; Zhang, W.; Tao, X.; Li, W., Pillared MXene with Ultralarge Interlayer Spacing as a Stable Matrix for High Performance Sodium Metal Anodes. Advanced Functional Materials 2019, 29 (3), 1805946.

[0075] 15. Xu, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, T.; Sun, L.; Nuli, Y.; Wang, J.; Hirano, S.-i., Stable Na Metal Anode Enabled by a Reinforced Multistructural SEI Layer. Advanced Functional Materials 2019, 29 (27), 1901924.

[0076] 16. Zhu, M.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Guo, B.; Xu, G.; Huang, Z.; Wu, M.; Liu, H.-K.; Dou, S.-X.; Wu, C., Dendrite-Free Sodium Metal Anodes Enabled by a Sodium Benzenedithiolate-Rich Protection Layer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2020, 59 (16), 6596-6600.

[0077] 17. Luo, W.; Lin, C.-F.; Zhao, O.; Noked, M.; Zhang, Y.; Rubloff, G. W.; Hu, L., Ultrathin Surface Coating Enables the Stable Sodium Metal Anode. Advanced Energy Materials 2017, 7 (2), 1601526.

[0078] 18. Niu, C.; Pan, H.; Xu, W.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, J.-G.; Luo, L.; Wang, C.; Mei, D.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Mai, L.; Liu, J., Self-smoothing anode for achieving high-energy sodium metal batteries under realistic conditions. Nature Nanotechnology 2019, 14 (6), 594-601.

[0079] 19. Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, S.; Edström, K.; Strømme, M.; Nyholm, L., Lightweight, Thin, and Flexible Silver Nanopaper Electrodes for High-Capacity Dendrite-Free Sodium Metal Anodes. Advanced Functional Materials 2018, 28 (48), 1804038.

[0080] 20. Ye, L.; Liao, M.; Zhao, T.; Sun, H.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Peng, H., A Sodiophilic Interphase-Mediated, Dendrite-Free Anode with Ultrahigh Specific Capacity for Sodium-Metal Batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2019, 58 (47), 17054-17060.

[0081] 21. Slotboom, J. W.; de Graaff, H. C., Measurements of bandgap narrowing in Si bipolar transistors. Solid-State Electronics 1976, 19 (10), 857-862.

[0082] 22. Jensen, T.; Diening, A.; Huber, G.; Chai, B. H. T., investigation of diode-pumped 2.8-.Math.m Er:LiYF4 lasers with various doping levels. Optics Letters 1996, 21 (8), 585-587.

[0083] 23. Arora, P. et al., Battery Separators Chemical Reviews 2004 104 (10), pg. 4419-4462.

[0084] 24. Wang, et al., “Development of solid-state electrolytes for sodium-ion battery-A short review”, Vol. 1, pp. 91-100 (2019)

[0085] 25. Schroder et al., Comparatively assessing different shapes of litihium-ion battery cells, ScienceDirect Procedia Manufacturing 8 pg. 104 - 111 (2017).

[0086] 26. U.S. Patent No. 9,099,718

[0087] 27. Brant et al., “Selective Control of Composition in Prussian White for Enhanced Material Properties”, Chemistry of Materials, Vo. 31, No. 18, pp. 7203-7211 (2019)).

[0088] 28. Komaba et al. “P2-type Nax[Fe½Mn½]O2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries” Nature Materials, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 512-517 (2012).

[0089] 29. Komaba et al., “P2-type Nax[Fe½Mn½]O2 made from earth-abundant elements for rechargeable Na batteries”, Nature Materials, Vol. 11, No.6, pp. 512-517 (2012).

[0090] 30. Keller et al., “Layered Na-lon Cathodes with Outstanding Performance Resulting from the Synergetic Effect of Mixed P- and O-Type Phases”, Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 6, No.3 (2016).

[0091] 31. U.S. Pat. No. US 10,263,254.

[0092] 32. NEI Corporation, “sodium-ion battery materials”, page last visted on Oct. 29, 2020 (www.neicorporation.com/products/batteries/sodium-ion-battery-materials/).