METHOD FOR PREPARING POROUS POLYMER SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE AND PRODUCT THEREOF

Abstract

Provided by the present invention is a method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane, wherein a hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer and a hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent containing a thiol functional group are mixed and dissolved in a solvent capable of dissolving both of them to obtain a coating solution; the coating solution is applied onto the surface of a biosensor electrode and dried such that the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component undergo phase separation; then, a membrane is formed and crosslinking is carried out, the unreacted hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent is removed, and re-drying is carried out to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane; also disclosed is a product. For the product obtained by the preparation method of the present invention, the hydrophobicity of the polymer enables good adhesion of the porous polymer semipermeable membrane to the surface of the biosensor, and the porous structure ensures the diffusion of biological substances to the surface of the biosensor, and regulates the diffusion rate of the biological substances in the semipermeable membrane without changing the thickness of the polymer membrane significantly.

Claims

1. A method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane, comprising the following steps: mixing and dissolving a hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer and a hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent containing a thiol functional group, in a solvent capable of dissolving both of them, to obtain a coating solution; applying the coating solution on the surface of a biosensor electrode and then drying, wherein during the drying process, the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component undergo phase separation; forming a membrane and carrying out crosslinking, removing unreacted hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent, and re-drying to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane.

2. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer has a structural formula as shown below: ##STR00039## ##STR00040## ##STR00041## where Z is CH.sub.2, CH.sub.2CH.sub.2, O, S, N-R.sub.4 or C=C(R.sub.5R.sub.6); Y is O, S or NH; R.sub.1 is H, a linear/branched/cyclic hydrocarbyl group, a lipid/ether-containing group or ##STR00042## R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 are selected from a group consisting of linear/branched/cyclic hydrocarbyl groups and ##STR00043## and R .sub.2 and R.sub.3 are identical or different; R.sub.4 is a linear/branched/cyclic hydrocarbyl group; R.sub.5 is H or an alkyl group, R.sub.6 is H or an alkyl group, and R.sub.5 and R.sub.6 are identical or different; n = 1-10, R.sub.7 is H or an alkyl group, R.sub.8 is H or an alkyl group, R.sub.9 is H or an alkyl group, and R.sub.7, R.sub.8 and R.sub.9 are identical or different; the polynorbornene polymer has a molecular weight of 10,000 g/mol - 2,000,000 g/mol; and the hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent contains at least two thiol functional groups.

3. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 2, wherein the molecular weight of the polynorbornene polymer is 200,000 g/mol - 1,000,000 g/mol; and the hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent contains 2-4 thiol functional groups.

4. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 3, wherein the structural formula of the small-molecule crosslinking agent containing two thiol functional groups is ##STR00044## ##STR00045## ##STR00046## ##STR00047## where n = 1-10; the structural formula of the small-molecule crosslinking agent containing three thiol functional groups is ##STR00048## ##STR00049## where n = 1-10, m = 0-5, and the thiol branches are identical or different in length; the structural formula of the small-molecule crosslinking agent containing four thiol functional groups is: ##STR00050## where n is 1-10, and the thiol branches are identical or different in length.

5. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer and the hydrophilic small-molecule crosslinking agent are in such a ratio that the molar ratio of C=C : -SH is from 10:1 to 1:20; the solvent is one or a mixture of any two selected from the group consisting of tetrahydrofuran, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, ethylene glycol and water; the mass concentration of the hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer in the coating solution is 1%-25%.

6. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 1, wherein the coating is dip coating, spin coating, knife coating or spray coating; the coating is carried out at an ambient temperature of 15-60° C.; and the two drying steps are both carried out at 15-80° C. and each drying step lasts for 1 min to 2 h.

7. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 6, wherein the coating is carried out at an ambient temperature of 25-50° C.; after the first drying step, the membrane is placed in a gaseous solvent environment to further promote the phase separation between the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component, and the gaseous solvent is the solvent used for dissolving the hydrophobic polynorbornene polymer.

8. The method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane according to claim 1, wherein the crosslinking is UV crosslinking or heat crosslinking of the polymer semipermeable membrane coated on the surface of the biosensor electrode; the UV crosslinking is carried out at a wavelength of 250-400 nm; and the heat crosslinking is carried out at 50-80° C. for 0.5-4 h.

9. (canceled)

10. (canceled)

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] FIG. 1 shows the surface morphology of a porous polymer semipermeable membrane as analyzed by an atomic force microscope;

[0020] FIG. 2 shows the surface morphology of a non-porous polymer semipermeable membrane as analyzed by an atomic force microscope;

[0021] FIG. 3 shows the response to glucose concentration of a biosensor coated with a non-porous polymer semipermeable membrane;

[0022] FIG. 4 shows the response to glucose concentration of a biosensor coated with a porous polymer semipermeable membrane.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0023] Example 1 of the present invention: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

[0024] Poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide) (molecular weight: 100,000 g/mol) and pentaerythritol tetramercaptoacetate (molar ratio C=C : -SH = 1:4) were dissolved in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran/n-butanol (V.sub.THF: V.sub.n-butanol = 1:4) to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide was 10%). A biosensor was immersed into the coating solution, and a layer of polymer membrane was formed on the surface of the biosensor electrode by dip coating at 30° C., dried at 30° C. for 60 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was subjected to UV crosslinking at a wavelength of 365 nm, and an energy density of 25 mW • cm.sup.-2 for 4 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into n-butanol for 1 min to remove unreacted pentaerythritol tetramercaptoacetate, and dried at 30° C. for 60 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 12 .Math.m.

[0025] Example 2: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00013##

(molecular weight: 50,000 g/mol) and

##STR00014##

(molar ratio C=C : -SH = 1:20) were dissolved in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran/isopropanol (V.sub.THF: V.sub.isopropanol = 1:1) to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00015##

was 10%). The coating solution was applied onto the surface of a biosensor electrode by knife coating at 25° C., and dried at 30° C. for 30 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was subjected to UV crosslinking at a wavelength of 254 nm, and an energy density of 25 mW • cm.sup.-2 for 6 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted

##STR00016##

and re-dried at 30° C. for 120 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 13 .Math.m.

[0026] Example 3: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00017##

(molecular weight: 20,000 g/mol) and

##STR00018##

(molar ratio C=C : -SH = 1:2) were dissolved in isopropanol as a solvent to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00019##

was 2%). The coating solution was applied onto the surface of a biosensor electrode by spin coating at 20° C., and dried at 40° C. for 30 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was heated for crosslinking at 80° C. for 1 h. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 10 s to remove unreacted

##STR00020##

and dried at 40° C. for 60 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 350 nm.

[0027] Example 4: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00021##

(molecular weight: 2,000,000 g/mol) and

##STR00022##

(molar ratio C=C : -SH = 1:6) were dissolved in ethanol as a solvent to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00023##

was 20%). The coating solution was applied onto the surface of a biosensor electrode by spray coating at 35° C., and dried at 50° C. for 120 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was heated for crosslinking at 80° C. for 120 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted

##STR00024##

and dried at 50° C. for 120 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 70 .Math.m.

[0028] Example 5: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00025##

(molecular weight: 100,000 g/mol) and polythiol (molar ratio C=C : -SH = 1:5) were dissolved in propanol as a solvent to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00026##

was 15%). A biosensor was immersed into the coating solution, and the coating solution was applied onto the surface of the biosensor electrode by dip coating at 35° C., and dried at 20° C. for 1 h, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was subjected to UV crosslinking at a wavelength of 365 nm, and an energy density of 25 mW • cm.sup.-2 for 8 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted polythiol, and re-dried at 20° C. for 1 h to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 12 .Math.m.

[0029] Example 6: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00027##

(molecular weight: 300,000 g/mol) and

##STR00028##

(molar ratio: C=C : -SH = 9:1) were dissolved in tetrahydrofuran as a solvent to form a coating solution (the mass percent concentration of the polymer

##STR00029##

was 15%). A biosensor was immersed into the coating solution, and the coating solution was applied onto the surface of the biosensor electrode by dip coating at 20° C., and dried at 20° C. for 40 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation, and then it was placed in saturated ethanol steam at 25° C. to further promote thephase separation between the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component. Then, the resultant polymer membrane was subjected to UV crosslinking at a wavelength of 300 nm, and an energy density of 20 mW • cm.sup.-2 for 5 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed in ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted

##STR00030##

and re-dried at 30° C. for 40 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 13 .Math.m.

[0030] Example 7: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00031##

(molecular weight: 150,000 g/mol) and

##STR00032##

(molar ratio: C=C : -SH = 10:7) were dissolved in isopropanol as a solvent to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00033##

was 15%). The coating solution was applied onto the surface of a biosensor electrode by knife coating at 20° C., and dried at 35° C. for 60 min, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was subjected to UV crosslinking at a wavelength of 365 nm, and an energy density of 100 mW • cm.sup.-2 for 5 min. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted

##STR00034##

and re-dried at 35° C. for 60 min to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 40 .Math.m.

[0031] Example 8: Method for preparing a porous polymer semipermeable membrane:

##STR00035##

(molecular weight: 600,000 g/mol) and

##STR00036##

(molar ratio: C=C : -SH = 10:7) were dissolved in ethanol to form a coating solution (the mass percentage concentration of the polymer

##STR00037##

was 10%). A biosensor was immersed into the coating solution, and the coating solution was applied onto the surface of the biosensor electrode by dip coating at 25° C., and dried at 25° C. for 2 h, during which the hydrophobic component and the hydrophilic component underwent phase separation. The resultant polymer membrane was heated for crosslinking at 80° C. for 2 h. Thereafter, the biosensor was immersed into ethanol for 1 min to remove unreacted

##STR00038##

and re-dried at 25° C. for 2 h to obtain a porous polymer semipermeable membrane with a thickness of 8 .Math.m.

[0032] In order to verify the effect of the porous polymer semipermeable membrane of the present invention, the inventor also conducted a comparative test. A control biosensor was prepared (with reduced proportion of the hydrophilic crosslinking agent, a non-porous poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide) membrane was formed on an identical biosensor by coating), and compared with the biosensor with the porous polymer semipermeable membrane obtained in Example 1 in terms of properties.

Experimental Example

I. Porous Structure of Polymer Semipermeable Membrane

[0033] The thickness of the porous polymer semipermeable membrane obtained in Example 1 was about 12 .Math.m as measured by the Filmetrics F40 spectral measurement system. FIG. 1 shows the results of AFM characterization of the surface of the polymer membrane. As shown in FIG. 1, the enriched hydrophilic small molecules formed droplets distributed in the hydrophobic polymer membrane structure, which, after being removed, leaded to the porous structure with dark circular spots in the membrane.

[0034] The thickness of the non-porous polymer membrane was 6 .Math.m as measured by the Filmetrics F40 spectral measurement system. FIG. 2 shows the results of AFM characterization of the surface of the non-porous polymer membrane.

II. The Results of Comparative Experimental on Swelling Degree of Polymer Semipermeable Membranes

1. Experimental Content

[0035] The swelling degree of the polymer membrane in water was measured by the surface plasmon resonance experiment.

2. Experimental Results

[0036] The swelling degree of non-porous poly(N-n-propyloxynorbornene imide) in phosphate buffer was 109%, so it is difficult for glucose to diffuse through this highly hydrophobic semipermeable membrane and reach the electrode surface to produce current response. The swelling degree of the porous poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide) membrane in phosphate buffer was 111%, which is only slightly higher than that of the non-porous membrane.

3. Conclusion

[0037] From the experimental results, it can be seen that the swelling degree of the porous poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide) membrane is not much different from that of the non-porous membrane in water, and the polymer network framework of the porous membrane maintains the hydrophobicity of poly(N-n-butyloxynorbornene imide).

III. Comparative Experiment on the Response of Biosensor to Change of Glucose Concentration in Solution

1. Experimental Materials

[0038] The biosensor with a porous polymer semipermeable membrane obtained in Example 1; [0039] The same raw materials as those in Example 1 were used to obtain a biosensor with a non-porous polymer membrane (Comparative Example); [0040] The biosensor is based on PET, and a three-electrode structure is formed by ink-jet printing gold conductive ink: the working electrode and the reference electrode are located on the front of the biosensor, glucose oxidase is attached to the surface of the working electrode, and Ag/AgCl forms the reference electrode; the gold conductive layer on the back side of the sensor forms the counter electrode.

2. Experimental Content

[0041] The sensor was placed in phosphate buffer with glucose to measure the response of the sensor to the change of glucose concentration.

3. Experimental Results

[0042] The biosensor with a non-porous polymer membrane having a thickness of 6 .Math.m failed to respond to the change of glucose concentration in the solution, as shown in FIG. 3; by contrast, the biosensor with the porous polymer semipermeable membrane could quickly respond to the change of glucose concentration in the solution, as shown in FIG. 4.

[0043] In the above-mentioned comparative experiment on swelling degree, the swelling degree of the porous polymer membrane was not much higher than that of the control, which couldn’t significantly improve the diffusion rate of glucose in the semipermeable membrane. In the comparative experiment on the response to change of glucose concentration of biosensors with porous and non-porous polymer semipermeable membranes with different thicknesses, even though the thickness of the porous polymer semipermeable membrane was twice that of the non-porous polymer membrane, the porous polymer semipermeable membrane could still significantly improve the diffusion rate of glucose and ensure the responsiveness of biosensors.