METHOD FOR MONITORING A DANGER AREA AND MONITORING DEVICE

Abstract

A method for monitoring a danger area of a railway installation. At least one radio module is arranged in, or in the vicinity of, the danger area. Radio signals are transmitted by the radio module and the radio signals are received and evaluated. A pattern of the received radio signals in a basic state of the danger area is determined and when the radio signals are evaluated, differences from the pattern in the basic state are determined and a response is triggered when the differences exceed a predefined limit value. There is also described a monitoring device. The radio modules are preferably WLAN modules and the danger area is a tunnel. Timetabled breaches of the danger area by trains do not lead to an alarm and the radio modules are functionally tested by determining whether the predefined limit value is exceeded when a train travels through.

Claims

1-15. (canceled)

16. A method of monitoring a danger area of a railway installation, the method comprising: providing at least one radio module in the danger area or in a vicinity of the danger area; transmitting radio signals by the radio module; receiving and evaluating radio signals by the radio module; determining a pattern of the received radio signals in a basic state of the danger area; and evaluating the radio signals by determining differences from the pattern in the basic state and triggering a response when the differences exceed a predefined limit value.

17. The method according to claim 16, which comprises, following a triggered response, checking whether there exists a planned breach of the danger area.

18. The method according to claim 17, which comprises checking on a basis of a schedule of the railway installation whether there exists a planned breach of the danger area.

19. The method according to claim 16, which comprises providing and evaluating a plurality of radio modules.

20. The method according to claim 19, which comprises arranging the plurality of radio modules on the same side of the danger area.

21. The method according to claim 19, which comprises arranging the radio modules on opposite sides of the danger area.

22. The method according to claim 19, wherein at least one of the radio modules receives and evaluates radio signals which the at least one radio module has not transmitted itself.

23. The method according to claim 16, which comprises using at least one WLAN router as a radio module.

24. The method according to claim 16, which comprises checking a functionality of the at least one radio module by monitored whether or not the limit value is exceeded in the event of a planned breach of the danger area.

25. A monitoring apparatus for a danger area of a railway installation, the monitoring apparatus comprising: at least one radio module arranged in, or in a vicinity of, the danger area, said at least one radio module being configured to transmit and receive radio signals; at least one evaluation facility configured to evaluate the radio signals received by said at least one radio module; said at least one evaluation facility being configured to determine at least one pattern of the received radio signals in a basic state of the danger area, to determine differences from the at least one pattern in the basic state of the danger area, and to trigger a response when the differences exceed a predefined limit value.

26. The monitoring apparatus according to claim 25, configured for monitoring the danger area of the railway installation, wherein: radio signals are transmitted by said radio module and radio signals are received and evaluated by said radio module; a pattern of the received radio signals in a basic state of the danger area is determined; and the radio signals are evaluated by determining deviations from the pattern in the basic state and a response is triggered when the deviations exceed a predefined limit value.

27. A railway installation, comprising the monitoring apparatus according to claim 25.

28. The railway installation according to claim 27, wherein the said least one radio module of said monitoring apparatus is arranged in a tunnel of the railway installation and the tunnel forms the monitored danger area at least in sections.

29. A computer program product, comprising program commands for carrying out the method according to claim 16.

30. A computer program carrier, comprising computer program code stored in non-transitory form, the computer program code being configured to carry out the method according to claim 16 when executed on a computer.

Description

[0027] There is shown:

[0028] FIG. 1 A diagrammatic view of a first exemplary embodiment of a railway installation with a monitoring apparatus according to the invention;

[0029] FIG. 2 A diagrammatic view of a second exemplary embodiment of a railway installation with a monitoring apparatus according to the invention.

[0030] First of all, the invention is explained with reference to the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1. An exemplary embodiment of a railway installation 1 according to the invention comprises a route 2, a rail vehicle 3, a tunnel 4 and a monitoring apparatus 5. The monitoring apparatus 5 has a plurality of radio modules 6 and an evaluation facility 7 connected to the radio modules 6. In the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1, the radio modules 6 are all WLAN routers. The monitoring apparatus 5 is designed to monitor a hatched danger area 8, which in the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1 is located in the tunnel 4. With the monitoring apparatus 5, other danger areas of the railway installation 1 can also be monitored, such as, for example, level crossings or areas of platforms.

[0031] The radio modules 6, which are designed as WLAN routers, are arranged in the tunnel 4 and, during operation, transmit radio signals and also receive radio signals. The received radio signals can either originate from the radio module 6, which has also transmitted them, or else from other radio modules 6. The radio signals are advantageously reflected on the walls of the tunnel. The monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention is therefore particularly suitable for monitoring danger areas located in closed spaces. The radio modules 6 each transmit a signal to the connected evaluation facility 7 which is representative of the received radio signals. During operation, the evaluation facility 7 evaluates the received radio signals from the radio modules 6.

[0032] When the monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention is put into operation, a pattern of the received radio signals is determined in a basic state of the danger area 8. The evaluation facility 7 then determines differences from the pattern in the basic state. Such differences arise when an additional object, such as, for example, the rail vehicle 3 or a person, is located in the danger area 8 or travels through it. The evaluation facility 7 then triggers a planned response if the differences determined from the pattern in the basic state exceed a predefined limit value. In the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1, this response is, for example, an alarm signal 9 which is determined at a control center 10 of the railway installation 1. In the control center 10, a check is then made as to how the alarm signal 9 is to be evaluated and how the operating sequence must be changed if necessary. For example, the control center 10 uses a timetable of the railway installation 1 to check whether the rail vehicle 3 should pass through the tunnel 4 as planned at the time of the alarm signal 9. If this is the case, there is an authorized breach of the danger area 8 and no additional measures need be taken in the operating sequence, for example.

[0033] Furthermore, the failure disclosure of the railway installation 1 can be checked in this case. At the scheduled time of the passage of the rail vehicle 3 through the tunnel 4, the alarm signal 9 must arrive at the control center 10 within a predetermined time window. If this does not occur, there may be a fault in the monitoring apparatus 5. In this case, for example, a check of the monitoring apparatus 5 and, if appropriate, a blocking of the tunnel 4 is initiated. According to the invention, a very simple failure disclosure is thus made possible by observing and evaluating the monitoring apparatus 5, taking into account the operating sequences in the danger area 8. This is carried out at the control center 10, which thus fulfills various reliability and safety requirements.

[0034] Special test messages or test signals which can be generated by the radio modules 6 and are suitable for the detection of objects in the danger area 8 can be used as radio signals of the radio modules 6.

[0035] For the monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention, it is advantageous to use existing radio modules 6 which are, for example, part of an existing train protection facility of the railway installation 1. For example, radio modules 6 of known facilities such as Sitraffic EsCos RSU or the Airlink radio communication system can be used for this purpose, so that little or no additional hardware is required for the monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention.

[0036] Of course, the monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention can also monitor danger areas 8 other than the tunnel 4 in FIG. 1, such as, for example, tracks on platforms, operating areas or level crossings.

[0037] The tunnel 4 of the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1 is particularly suitable for the monitoring apparatus 5 according to the invention because it represents an area which is essentially closed off from the environment and reflects the radio signals emitted by the radio modules 6. As a result of reflection, it is possible that, in the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 1, the radio modules 6 are arranged exclusively on the same side of the danger area 8.

[0038] The invention is explained below with regard to the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 2. For the sake of simplicity, only the differences from the embodiment in FIG. 1 will be discussed.

[0039] Unlike the embodiment in FIG. 1, in the exemplary embodiment in FIG. 2, the radio modules 6 of the monitoring apparatus 5 are arranged on opposite sides of the danger area 8 or of the tunnel 4. This has the advantage that radio signals from opposite radio modules 6 can also be received. As a result, it is not necessary for the radio signals of the radio modules 6 to be reflected on the walls of the tunnel 4. In addition, however, this can of course also take place.