MIMINALLY-INVASIVE ATOPIC DERMATITIS TEST METHOD USING MICRONEEDLE PATCH AND MINIMALLY-INVASIVE ATOPIC DERMATITIS TEST KIT COMPRISING MICRONEEDLE PATCH

Abstract

A minimally-invasive atopic dermatitis test method comprises the steps of: applying, to the skin of a subject, a microneedle patch including a plurality of microneedles made of a biodegradable hyaluronic acid polymer and having a solid core structure and a bottom layer which is a base on which the plurality of microneedles are formed; maintaining the microneedle patch attached to the skin of the subject for a predetermined time; separating the microneedle patch from the skin of the subject after a predetermined time has passed to input the microneedle patch to a quantitative test; reading the amount of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 adsorbed onto the surface of the microneedles of the microneedle patch in the quantitative test step; and evaluating atopic dermatitis activity on the basis of the reading of the amount of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13.

Claims

1. A minimally invasive method for diagnosing atopic dermatitis comprising steps of: applying, to a skin of a subject, a microneedle patch comprising a plurality of microneedles, which are formed of biodegradable polymer hyaluronic acid and have a solid structure, and a bottom layer on which the plurality of microneedles are formed; maintaining the microneedle patch for a predetermined time in a state in which the microneedle patch is attached to the skin of the subject; separating the microneedle patch from the skin of the subject after the predetermined time and putting the separated microneedle patch into quantitative testing; reading amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, adsorbed onto surfaces of the microneedles of the microneedle patch, in the quantitative testing; and evaluating an activity of atopic dermatitis based on the read amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 .

2. The minimally invasive method for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 1, wherein the quantitative testing is ELISA measurement.

3. The minimally invasive method for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 2, wherein an amount of detected IFN-gamma is not considered in evaluating the activity of atopic dermatitis.

4. The minimally invasive method for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 3, wherein the predetermined time is predetermined in consideration of a molecular weight-dependent dissolution rate of the hyaluronic acid constituting the microneedles.

5. The minimally invasive method for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 4, wherein, as the molecular weight of the hyaluronic acid constituting the microneedles increases from a low molecular weight to a high molecular weight, the time of attachment to the skin of the subject is lengthened and biodetection performance is improved.

6. A minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis comprising: a device configured to quantitatively analyze amounts of proteins extracted from an skin of a subject; and a microneedle patch comprising a plurality of microneedles, which are formed of biodegradable polymer hyaluronic acid and have a solid structure, and a bottom layer on which the plurality of microneedles are formed, wherein the microneedle patch is applied to the skin of the subject, maintained for a predetermined time, and then separated from the skin, and in the separated state, the proteins from the subject, adsorbed onto surfaces of the microneedles of the microneedle patch, are quantitatively analyzed by the device, the device reads amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 adsorbed onto the surfaces of the microneedles of the microneedle patch, and an activity of atopic dermatitis is evaluated based on the read amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13.

7. The minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 6, wherein ELISA measurement is performed by the device.

8. The minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 7, wherein an amount of detected IFN-gamma is not considered in evaluating the activity of atopic dermatitis.

9. The minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 8, wherein the predetermined time is predetermined in consideration of a molecular weight-dependent dissolution rate of the hyaluronic acid constituting the microneedles.

10. The minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to claim 9, wherein, as the molecular weight of the hyaluronic acid constituting the microneedles increases from a low molecular weight to a high molecular weight, the time of attachment to the skin of the subject is lengthened and biodetection performance is improved.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0024] FIG. 1 shows a skin biopsy method according to a conventional art.

[0025] FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a skin biopsy method according to the present invention.

[0026] FIG. 3 shows four controls in an experiment (hereinafter referred to as basic experiment 1) conducted by the present inventors on a minimally invasive skin biopsy method closely related to the concept of the present invention prior to a clinical trial related to a diagnostic method for atopic dermatitis. Specifically, FIG. 3 shows 1) a blank patch in which microneedles are not formed, 2) metallic solid microneedles, 3) a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, and 4) a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch.

[0027] FIG. 4 is a table showing the results of conducting a pro-collagen 1 detection test for a patient group aged 30 to 39 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 using the four controls of basic experiment 1.

[0028] FIG. 5 is a table showing the results of measuring changes in length of microneedles before and after the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch and the high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch among the four controls of basic experiment 1 are applied to skin biopsy.

[0029] FIG. 6 is a table showing the results of another basic experiment (hereinafter referred to as “basic experiment 2”). Controls used here are 1) a blank patch in which microneedles are not formed, 2) a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, and 3) a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch. Each of the controls was applied to the skins of a patient group aged 20 to 29 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 years for 5 seconds and 60 seconds and then detached, and the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected was measured.

[0030] FIG. 7 shows the results of measuring the amount of detected pro-collagen 1 after the controls according to basic experiment 2 were applied to the skins of a patient group aged 20 to 29 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 years for 10 seconds and 30 seconds and then detached.

[0031] FIG. 8 is a table showing the results of still another basic experiment (hereinafter referred to as “basic experiment 3”). Controls used here are 1) a low-molecular-weight chitosan microneedle patch, and 2) a high-molecular-weight chitosan microneedle patch. Each of the controls was applied to the skin for 5 seconds, 60 seconds and 300 seconds and then detached, and the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected was measured.

[0032] FIG. 9 shows photographs of three types of patches used in a clinical test to verify the effect of the present invention.

[0033] FIG. 10 is a table showing a clinical trial schedule.

[0034] FIG. 11 is a table summarizing information on clinical trial subjects.

[0035] FIG. 12 is a table showing the amounts of protein attached to four types of means for obtaining skin samples: tape, blank patch, HA microneedle, and hollow needle.

[0036] FIGS. 13 and 14 are graphs showing the results of analyzing the expression level of each of IL-13 and IFN-gamma using a tape and a microneedle.

[0037] FIG. 15 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IL-4 in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles.

[0038] FIG. 16 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IL-13 in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles.

[0039] FIG. 17 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IFN-gamma in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles.

[0040] FIG. 18 shows the results of statistical analysis (SPSS) performed to analyze the correlation between the expression of IL-4 in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles and the clinical course of atopic dermatitis.

[0041] FIG. 19 shows the results of statistical analysis (SPSS) performed to analyze the correlation between the expression of IL-13 in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles and the clinical course of atopic dermatitis.

[0042] FIG. 20 shows the results of statistical analysis (SPSS) performed to analyze the correlation between the expression of IFN-gamma in skin samples obtained from clinical trial subjects by HA microneedles and the clinical course of atopic dermatitis.

MODE FOR INVENTION

[0043] Reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the present invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present invention. It should be understood that various embodiments of the present invention are different but need not be mutually exclusive. The following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention should be construed as covering the scope of the claims and all equivalents thereto.

[0044] Hereinafter, various preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings in order to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to easily practice the present invention.

Results of Basic Experimental Results on Minimally Invasive Skin Biopsy Method

[0045] FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a skin testing method according to the present invention.

[0046] The upper left of FIG. 2 shows a commercially available microneedle patch with the trade name “Therapass”. This product is a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch with a molecular weight of 1,000 kDa, which is marketed and sold by the applicant company. The lower left of FIG. 2 shows a state in which the microneedle patch has been applied to the skin, more specifically, a state in which the microneedles of the patch have penetrated the dermal layer of the skin. The right part of FIG. 2 conceptually illustrates a representative technical idea of the present invention in which a microneedle patch is applied to a dermatitis patient and then a biopsy is performed using the skin protein attached to the microneedles of the patch. The term “bio-mining” indicated in FIG. 2 is used to mean extracting proteins in the skin of a subject for biopsy.

[0047] FIG. 3 shows four controls in basic experiment 1 conducted by the present inventors on a minimally invasive skin biopsy method closely related to the concept of the present invention prior to a clinical trial related to a diagnostic method for atopic dermatitis. Among these four controls, the first control is a blank patch in which microneedles are not formed. The second control is metallic solid microneedles. The third control is a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch. The molecular weight of hyaluronic acid used in the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch is 110 kDa. The fourth control is a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch. The molecular weight of hyaluronic acid used in the high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch is 1,000 kDa.

[0048] FIG. 4 is a table showing the results of conducting a pro-collagen 1 detection test for a patient group aged 30 to 39 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 using the above-described four controls.

[0049] The x-axis of FIG. 4 shows a blank patch, a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid patch, and a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid patch. The y-axis shows the mass per unit volume of detected pro-collagen 1 in units of picograms per milliliter. Among the four controls, the metallic solid microneedles are not shown. The reason is that protein quantification itself was not performed at all. “ELISA” shown in FIG. 4 refers to a method that is used in modern biotechnology to quantitatively measure the intensity and amount of an antigen-antibody reaction by labeling an antibody or antigen with an enzyme and measuring the activity of the enzyme. This method was used throughout the experiments conducted in the present invention.

[0050] What should be looked at carefully in the table of FIG. 4 is whether the detection result is substantially different from that obtained by the blank patch that is the first control. This is because the blank patch is a conventional art that existed prior to the filing of the present invention, and if the detection result is not substantially different from that obtained by the blank patch, it means that the present invention does not contribute to the improvement of the detection effect. Referring to the results in FIG. 4, the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected in the low-molecular-weight (110 kDa) hyaluronic acid patch was not substantially different from that in the blank patch. However, it can be seen that the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected in the high-molecular-weight (1,000 kDa) hyaluronic acid patch significantly increased compared to those in the blank patch and the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid patch.

[0051] The present inventors continued experiments and analyzed the cause of how this remarkable difference in the results appeared depending on the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid, which is a component of the microneedle patch, and found the cause in the rate of dissolution into the skin depending on the difference in the molecular weight. The microneedle component of a currently commercialized microneedle patch is generally a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer material. “Biocompatible material” refers to a material that is not toxic to the human body and is chemically inert. In addition, “biodegradable material” refers to a material that may be degraded in vivo by body fluids, enzymes or microorganisms. In addition, it is known that the dissolution rate of biodegradable materials in vivo tends to increase as the molecular weight becomes smaller, and tends to decrease as the molecular weight becomes higher. Meanwhile, the following materials are known as biocompatible polymers:

[0052] Hyaluronic acid (HA), gelatin, chitosan, collagen, alginic acid, pectin, carrageenan, chondroitin (sulfate), dextran (sulfate), polylysine, carboxymethyl chitin, fibrin, agarose, pullulan, cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), sodium carboxymethylcellulose, polyalcohol, gum Arabic, alginate, cyclodextrin, dextrin, glucose, fructose, starch, trehalose, glucose, maltose, lactose, lactulose, fructose, turanose, melitose, melezitose, dextran, sorbitol, xylitol, palatinit, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polyethylene oxide, polyacrylic acid, polyacrylamide, polymethacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, a poly(ethyleneglycol)/polyester) copolymer, chitosan/glycerol phosphate, polyphosphazene, polycaprolactone, polycarbonate, poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(propylene glycol), polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly(N-(2-hydroxyethyl)methacrylamide-lactate, poly(propylene phosphate), and the like.

[0053] When a microneedle patch is attached to the skin, protein may be extracted after it adheres to the biocompatible microneedle structure in a process in which the microneedles of the patch enter the dermal layer of the skin and in a process in which the microneedles are maintained after the entry. However, the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle has a relatively high dissolution rate even if protein in vivo adheres to the surface of the microneedle, and thus when the microneedle is attached to the skin for a long time, the protein attached to the surface may be lost while the microneedle itself is dissolved. It is believed that the experimental results in FIG. 4 were obtained for this reason. The results supporting this belief are shown in FIG. 6.

[0054] FIG. 5 is a table showing the results of measuring changes in length of microneedles before and after the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch and the high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch among the above-described four controls are applied to skin biopsy.

[0055] Referring to the results in FIG. 5, the microneedles of the 110 kDa low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch showed a decrease in length of approximately 30% during their attachment to the human skin. On the other hand, the microneedles of the 1,000 kDa high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch showed a decrease in length of only about 10% during their attachment to the skin. These experimental results support that the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle has a relatively high dissolution rate even if protein in vivo adheres to the surface thereof, and thus when the microneedle is attached to the skin for a long time, the protein attached to the surface may be lost while the microneedle itself is dissolved, and this protein loss is the cause of the experimental results shown in FIG. 4. In experiment 1 shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, each control was attached to the skin for 5 minutes. Accordingly, the present inventors have found the need to perform experiments for different lengths of time by reducing the time of attachment to the skin to less than 5 minutes, and planned an experiment (experiment 2) different from the above-described basic experiment (experiment 1).

[0056] FIG. 6 is a table showing the results of basic experiment 2 different from the above-described basic experiment 1. Controls used here are 1) a blank patch in which microneedles are not formed, 2) a low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, and 3) a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch. Each of the controls was applied to the skins of a patient group aged 20 to 29 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 years for 5 seconds and 60 seconds and then detached, and the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected was measured. The molecular weight of the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid and the molecular weight of the high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid are the same as those in basic experiment 1. As the low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, a microneedle patch for cosmetic use sold by the applicant was used, and as the high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, a microneedle patch for medical device use (trade name: “Therapass”) sold by the applicant was used. Since the experimental results of basic experiment 1 indicated that the bioprotein extraction performance of the metallic solid microneedle was significantly insufficient, the metallic solid microneedle was not used as a control in experiment 2.

[0057] The following facts can be seen from the experimental results shown in FIG. 6. First, when the attachment time is 5 seconds, a significant improvement in the results obtained by the microneedle patch compared to those obtained by the blank patch cannot be expected. Second, when the attachment time is 60 seconds, the microneedle patches (low-molecular-weight and high-molecular-weight) show significantly superior bioprotein extraction performance compared to the blank patch. Third, even when the attachment time is 60 seconds, the bioprotein extraction performance of the high-molecular-weight microneedle patch is superior to the bioprotein extraction performance of the low-molecular-weight microneedle patch. The present inventors additionally conducted the experiment shown in FIG. 7 to obtain additional results for an attachment time longer than 5 seconds and shorter than 60 seconds, based on the experimental results shown in FIG. 6.

[0058] FIG. 7 shows the results of measuring the amount of detected pro-collagen 1 after the controls according to basic experiment 2 were applied to the skins of a patient group aged 20 to 29 years and a patient group aged 60 to 69 years for 10 seconds and 30 seconds and then detached.

[0059] In the case of the blank patch, there was no significant change in the results either when the attachment time was 10 seconds or when the attachment time was 30 seconds, and the table in FIG. 7 shows only the results obtained when the attachment time was 30 seconds. The facts that can be seen from the results shown in FIG. 7 are as follows. First, even when the attachment time is 10 seconds, it can be confirmed that the bioprotein extraction performance of the microneedle patches (low-molecular-weight and high-molecular-weight) is significantly improved compared to that of the blank patch. Second, when the attachment time is 10 seconds, the protein extraction performance of the low-molecular-weight microneedle patch is substantially the same as that of the high-molecular-weight microneedle patch. Third, when the attachment time is 30 seconds, the protein extraction performance of the high-molecular-weight microneedle patch is remarkably superior to the protein extraction performance of the low-molecular-weight microneedle patch.

[0060] It is evaluated that the technical significance of the experiment shown in FIG. 7 is that the microneedle patch can exhibit significant biopsy performance when an attachment time of 10 seconds or more is maintained, and that the low-molecular-weight microneedle patch shows substantially the same biopsy performance as the high-molecular-weight microneedle patch at an attachment time of about 10 seconds, which is before the time for the low molecular weight microneedle to dissolve into the skin has elapsed.

[0061] Finally, the present inventors conducted the experiment (basic experiment 3) shown in FIG. 9 using a microneedle patch made of chitosan in order to examine whether a microneedle patch made of a biocompatible polymer material other than hyaluronic acid would be suitable for use in biopsy. Chitosan is a biocompatible high-molecular-weight material, like hyaluronic acid, but is not biodegradable. Chitosan is a material obtained by processing chitin contained in crustaceans so as to be easily absorbed in the human body, and is known to have the effects of inhibiting senescence and strengthening immunity by activating degenerated cells. Chitosan is widely used as a cosmetic ingredient because its effect on skin cell activation has been proven, and is also used as a component of a microneedle patch for skin care purposes.

[0062] FIG. 8 is a table showing the results of basic experiment 3″. Controls used here are 1) a low-molecular-weight chitosan microneedle patch, and 2) a high-molecular-weight chitosan microneedle patch. Each of the controls was applied to the skin for 5 seconds, 60 seconds and 300 seconds and then detached, and the amount of pro-collagen 1 detected was measured.

[0063] In the experiment shown in FIG. 8, the molecular weight of low-molecular-weight chitosan 1 is 50 to 100 kDa. The molecular weight of high-molecular-weight chitosan 2 is 250 to 350 kDa. For a patient group aged 20 to 29 years, each chitosan microneedle patch was attached for 5 seconds, 1 minute, and 5 minutes, and then the expression of pro-collagen I was analyzed. From the experimental results of experiment 3 shown in FIG. 8, the present inventors confirmed that chitosan, which is a biocompatible polymer material, could exert a protein extraction function for biopsy, like hyaluronic acid. It can be seen that various other biocompatible polymer materials other than hyaluronic acid and chitosan exemplified in the present specification may also be considered sufficient candidates for microneedle patch materials for minimally invasive skin biopsy.

Results of Study on Novel Diagnostic Method for Atopic Dermatitis (Conduction of Clinical trial)

[0064] FIG. 9 shows photographs of three types of patches used in a clinical test to verify the effect of the present invention.

[0065] The blank patch on the left side of FIG. 9 is composed of only a hydrocolloid material patch, and a needle structure is not formed thereon. The hollow patch in the middle of FIG. 9 is a microneedle commercially available from INCYTO, and has a structure in which a hole having a micro-sized cross-sectional area is formed in the center of an elongated metal needle. As the hyaluronic acid (HA) microneedle patch on the right of FIG. 9, a commercially available microneedle patch (trade name: “Therapass”) is shown. This product is a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch with a molecular weight of 1,000 kDa, which is marketed and sold by the applicant company.

[0066] This clinical trial was conducted on 20 patients with atopic dermatitis (forearm). The study period was 5 months after IRB approval. The study method is as follows.

[0067] 1) Week 0 [0068] Biopsy: 3 mm biopsy [0069] Tape stripping: 15 strippings with D-Squame disk tape [0070] Protein extraction: protein extraction from tapes or microneedle patches using SDS

[0071] 2) Week 2 [0072] Testing using 3 types of microneedle patches: attachment of 3 types of microneedle patches for 5 minutes, followed by detachment [0073] Protein extraction: protein extraction from tapes or microneedle patches using SDS

[0074] In this way, testing on each subject was conducted at week 0 and week 2, and the clinical usefulness of the testing method was evaluated by comparing the test result with the clinical course. In this evaluation, protein quantification was performed by BCA assay, and IL-4, IL-13, and IFN-gamma were quantified by performing ELISA assay. SPSS was used as a statistical analysis technique.

[0075] FIG. 10 is a table showing a clinical trial schedule. As described above, a clinical trial was conducted for 5 months after IRB. After test subjects were recruited, tissue biopsy, D-squame tape stripping, blank patch, HA microneedle, and hollow needle patch were applied to the subjects upon visit at week 0, and proteins were isolated from each of the detection means. Finally, the amounts of isolated proteins were quantified, and ELISA was performed for IL-4, IL-13, IFN-gamma, followed by data analysis.

[0076] FIG. 11 is a table summarizing information on clinical trial subjects. The table in FIG. 11 shows the gender, age, and post-2-week symptom course of each subject who participated in this clinical trial (the expression “sl improved” for the course of patient No. 10 in the table denotes slightly improved, that is, a slightly improved course). Except for fail, a total of 20 subjects were enrolled and the study was conducted. Subjects No. 4, No. 5, No. 7, No. 16, No. 20, and No. 26, indicated to be distinguishable from other subjects in the table in FIG. 11, refused to second patch attachment/detachment, and thus were excluded from the subjects.

[0077] At week 0, skin samples were obtained using forearm biopsy, tape stripping, and three types of microneedle patches, and at week 2, skin samples were obtained using three types of microneedle patches. The obtained samples were placed in 60-mm dishes and immediately protein was extracted therefrom using an SDS solution in the laboratory and stored at -80° C.

[0078] FIG. 12 is a table showing the amounts of protein attached to four types of means for obtaining skin samples: tape, blank patch, HA microneedle, and hollow needle. The obtained skin samples were quantified for protein by BCA assay. At week 0, the tape, blank patch, hyaluronic acid microneedle, and hollow needle were all applied to the patients. After 2 weeks, except for the tape, the blank patch, hyaluronic acid microneedle and hollow needle were provided to the patients. Except for the hollow needle, the tape, blank patch, and hyaluronic acid microneedle were applied to normal subjects.

[0079] The amount of quantified protein can be seen in the graph of FIG. 12 (normal subjects are not included in the IRB). In the graph of FIG. 12, the NET OD (absorbance) value, which is the y-axis, was obtained using the following equation: ‘OD value of protein obtained through skin sample’ - ‘OD value of blank state of each patch’. From the protein quantification results, it was confirmed that almost no protein was extracted from the blank patch or hollow needle patch compared to the tape or hyaluronic acid microneedle patch. Thereby, it was confirmed that the blank patch or the hollow needle was not suitable for target factor detection using a non-invasive method.

[0080] The expression levels of IL-4, IL-13 and IFN-gamma in the samples obtained from normal subjects and atopic dermatitis patients by tissue biopsy, the tape and microneedle were analyzed. In the case of tissue biopsy, RNA was isolated and the expression levels of IL-4, IL-13 and IFN-gamma were analyzed by qRT-PCR assay, and expression of the above targets in the samples from the normal subjects was not identified, unlike the samples from the patients with atopic dermatitis. Next, in the case of the tape and the microneedle, protein was isolated and the expression levels of IL-13 and IFN-gamma were analyzed by ELISA assay. As shown in FIGS. 13 and 14, the expression of the above targets was not identified in the samples obtained from both the normal subjects and the atopic dermatitis patients by the tape, but it was confirmed that the expression levels of IL-13 and IFN-gamma in the samples obtained using the microneedle patch were higher in the atopic dermatitis patients than in the normal subjects.

[0081] The expression of IL-4, IL-13 and IFN-gamma in the obtained samples was measured by ELISA assay. The results are shown in FIGS. 15 to 17. FIG. 15 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IL-4 in the skin samples obtained from the clinical trial subjects by the HA microneedle. FIG. 16 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IL-13 in the skin samples obtained from the clinical trial subjects by the HA microneedle. FIG. 17 is a table showing the results of ELISA assay performed to measure the expression of IFN-gamma in the skin samples obtained from the clinical trial subjects by the HA microneedle.

[0082] From the measurement results in FIGS. 15 to 17, it was confirmed that the amounts of the target proteins in the skin samples obtained from the atopic dermatitis patients by the hyaluronic acid microneedle patch upon visit at weeks 0 and 2 changed.

[0083] More specifically, the measurement result in FIG. 15 will be described below.

[0084] For patient No. 1, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.021, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.044.

[0085] For patient No. 2, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.029, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.012.

[0086] For patient No. 2, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.026, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.017.

[0087] For patient No. 6, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.053, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.043.

[0088] For patient No. 8, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.025, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.021.

[0089] For patient No. 9, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.072, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.141.

[0090] For patient No. 10, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.065, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.093.

[0091] For patient No. 11, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.012, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.098.

[0092] For patient No. 12, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.053, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.095.

[0093] For patient No. 13, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.026, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.022.

[0094] For patient No. 14, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.029, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.027.

[0095] For patient No. 15, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.034, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.025.

[0096] For patient No. 17, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.036, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.027.

[0097] For patient No. 18, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.038, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.025.

[0098] For patient No. 19, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.023, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.021.

[0099] For patient No. 21, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.026, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.052.

[0100] For patient No. 22, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.012, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.038.

[0101] For patient No. 23, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.031, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.017.

[0102] For patient No. 24, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.035, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.028.

[0103] For patient No. 25, the OD value of IL-4 at week 0 is 0.025, and the OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.024.

[0104] More specifically, the measurement results in FIG. 16 will be described below.

[0105] For patient No. 1, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0027, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0017.

[0106] For patient No. 2, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0072, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0002.

[0107] For patient No. 3, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0072, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0017.

[0108] For patient No. 6, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0132, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0077.

[0109] For patient No. 8, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0062, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0059.

[0110] For patient No. 9, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0059, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0069.

[0111] For patient No. 10, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0052, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0059.

[0112] For patient No. 11, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0052, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0052.

[0113] For patient No. 12, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0022, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0062.

[0114] For patient No. 13, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0132, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0067.

[0115] For patient No. 14, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0072, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0069.

[0116] For patient No. 15, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0037, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0042.

[0117] For patient No. 17, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0042, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0037.

[0118] For patient No. 18, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0027, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0032.

[0119] For patient No. 19, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0059, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0049.

[0120] For patient No. 21, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0065, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0082.

[0121] For patient No. 22, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0102, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0102.

[0122] For patient No. 23, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0079, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0079.

[0123] For patient No. 24, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0137, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0092.

[0124] For patient No. 25, the net OD value of IL-13 at week 0 is 0.0502, and the net OD value of IL-4 at week 2 is 0.0082.

[0125] More specifically, the measurement results in FIG. 17 will be described below.

[0126] For patient No. 1, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0220, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0380.

[0127] For patient No. 2, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is -0.0005, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0410.

[0128] For patient No. 3, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0015, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is -0.0045.

[0129] For patient No. 6, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0350, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0140.

[0130] For patient No. 8, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0395, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0340.

[0131] For patient No. 9, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0345, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0640.

[0132] For patient No. 10, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0145, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0320.

[0133] For patient No. 11, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0515, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0465.

[0134] For patient No. 12, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0295, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0340.

[0135] For patient No. 13, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0410, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0340.

[0136] For patient No. 14, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0380, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0615.

[0137] For patient No. 15, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0455, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0560.

[0138] For patient No. 17, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0310, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0390.

[0139] For patient No. 18, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0405, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0275.

[0140] For patient No. 19, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0510, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0415.

[0141] For patient No. 21, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0285, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0000.

[0142] For patient No. 22, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0160, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0255.

[0143] For patient No. 23, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0140, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0260.

[0144] For patient No. 24, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0230, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0320.

[0145] For patient No. 24, the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 0 is 0.0365, and the net OD value of IFN-gamma at week 2 is 0.0285.

[0146] The present inventors analyzed the correlation between the expression of target proteins in the skin samples, obtained by the hyaluronic acid microneedle patch, and the clinical course of atopic dermatitis by statistical analysis (SPSS). The results are shown in FIGS. 18 to 20.

[0147] For statistical analysis of the correlation, the present inventors assigned different scores according to the clinical course of the lesion. A score of -1 was assigned to patient Nos. 12 and 15, who were clinically judged to have significantly aggravated or slightly aggravated symptoms, and a score of 1 was assigned to all patients other than patent No. 15. Referring to the clinical course after 2 weeks shown on the rightmost side of the table in FIG. 11, in the case of patient No. 12 marked as “so so + urticaria” symptoms, a clinical judgment was made that the symptoms were slightly aggravated. In the case of patient No. 15 marked as “aggravated”, a clinical judgment was made that the symptoms were significantly aggravated. For the remaining patients, a clinical judgment was made that the symptoms were maintained or improved.

[0148] The x-axis of the graph shown in the top of each of FIGS. 18 to 20 represents the clinical course. The y-axes of these graphs represent changes in IL-4, IL-13, and IFN-gamma (‘expression level of target at 2 weeks - ‘expression level of target at week 0’), respectively. As a result of statistical analysis, it was confirmed that there was a significant correlation between the clinical course of atopic dermatitis and changes in IL-4 and IL-13 (p<0.05). In addition, as a result of statistical analysis, it was confirmed that there was no correlation between the clinical course of atopic dermatitis and a change in IFN-gamma. Thereby, the clinical usefulness of target factor detection using a non-invasive method (application of the hyaluronic acid microneedle patch) was verified. In summary, it was confirmed that the detected amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 decreased in the atopic dermatitis patients having improved atopic symptoms, and that the detected amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 increased in the patients having aggravated atopic symptoms. Accordingly, reliable measurement of the activity of atopic dermatitis also became possible without intervention of the clinical judgment of medical staff, including doctors, by attaching the biodegradable high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid microneedle patch to the human body without invasive procedures such as tissue biopsy, detaching the microneedle patch, and then measuring changes in the expression levels of important biomarkers involved in pathogenesis.

[0149] In addition, using the minimally invasive kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to one embodiment of the present invention, which consists of a microneedle patch formed of biodegradable polymer hyaluronic acid and a device capable of quantitative analysis of proteins obtained from human skin, it is possible to easily and accurately evaluate the activity of atopic dermatitis by simply comparing the values of the amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, obtained by the quantitative analysis device, with predetermined values without depending on the medical knowledge or experience of the medical personnel. The above-described evaluation of the activity of atopic dermatitis may also be automatically performed by a functional unit that may be included in the kit for diagnosing atopic dermatitis according to one embodiment of the present invention. In this case, the functional unit may be configured to include: a storage unit configured to store data on the amounts of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 obtained from the quantitative analysis device and data on the correlation between these amounts and atopic dermatitis activity; an interface unit configured to transfer data from the quantitative analysis device; a comparison determination unit configured to compare and determine the data stored in the storage unit and the data transferred from the quantitative analysis device, thereby generating information on atopic dermatitis activity; and a display unit configured to display the information generated by the comparison determination unit.

[0150] Although the present invention has been described in detail described using specific matters such as specific components, limited embodiments, and the accompanying drawings, these embodiments are provided only for assisting in the entire understanding of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to these embodiments. Various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains from this description.

[0151] Therefore, the spirit of the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the above-described embodiments, and the following claims as well as all modified equally or equivalently to the claims are intended to fall within the scopes and spirit of the present invention.