ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION FOR MANUFACTURING WHETLERITE CARBONS

Abstract

A metal oxide impregnated activated carbon and a method of making the metal oxide impregnated carbon wherein the application of metal oxide impregnants are chemisorbed to active sites in a pore structure using atomic layer deposition to enable targeted impregnant compositions and configurations on activated carbons used for air purification devices.

Claims

1. A process of depositing one or more metal oxides onto an activated carbon substrate by atomic layer deposition comprising: exposing the activated carbon to a pulse of the first precursor compound, wherein the first precursor compound is chemically bonded to the activated carbon through chemical adsorption, applying a purge of inert gas to remove the excess of unreacted first precursor compound, exposing the activated carbon to a second precursor compound, wherein a surface reaction between the first precursor compound applied to the activated carbon surface, and the second precursor compound produces a desired reaction product bonded to the surface of the activated carbon, and applying a purge of inert gas to expel reaction by-products.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the first precursor compound is a first gaseous precursor.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein the first gaseous precursor comprises a metal, metal oxide, or combinations thereof.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the second precursor compound is a second gaseous precursor.

5. The process of claim 4 wherein the second gaseous precursor is selected to yield a metal oxide as the reaction product.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the desired reaction product is a transition metal.

7. The process of claim 3, wherein the first gaseous precursor comprises zinc, copper, molybdenum, silver, or any combination thereof.

8. The process of claim 4, wherein the second gaseous precursor is water vapor.

9. The process of claim 4, wherein the second gaseous precursor is an oxidizing source.

10. The process of claim 1, wherein the first precursor compound and second precursor compound are different compounds.

11. The process of claim 1, further comprising repeating the process one or more times.

12. The process of claim 11, wherein a new first precursor compound is selected during each process, and wherein a new second precursor compound is selected during each process.

13. The process of claim 12, wherein the first precursor compound and second precursor compound are different compounds.

14. The process of claim 1, wherein the activated carbon substrate is derived from wood, peat, coconut, coal, pitch, fruit stones, nut shells, or other suitable carbonaceous material.

15. The process of claim 1, wherein the activated carbon substrate is preferably derived from granular bituminous coal.

16. The process of claim 1, wherein the activated carbon substrate is preferably derived from granular coconut shell.

17. The process of claim 1, wherein the activated carbon substrate is in a powder, granular, extruded or monolithic form.

18. The process of claim 1, further comprising pretreating the activated carbon substrate by an acid washing process or a base washing process.

19. The process of claim 1, further comprising pretreating the activated carbon substrate using a reducing reagent or an oxidizing reagent.

20. A filter media for removing gas phase contaminants comprising: a substrate, wherein the substrate comprises an activated carbon; and one or more metal oxides, wherein the one or more metal oxides is impregnated on the activated carbon comprising the method of: exposing the activated carbon to a pulse of the first precursor compound, wherein the first precursor compound is chemically bonded to the activated carbon through chemical adsorption, applying a purge of inert gas to remove the excess of unreacted first precursor compound, exposing the activated carbon to a second precursor compound, wherein a surface reaction between the first precursor compound applied to the activated carbon surface, and the second precursor compound produces a desired reaction product bonded to the surface of the activated carbon, and applying a purge of inert gas to expel gaseous reaction by-products.

21. The filter media substrate of claim 20 wherein the metal oxide is impregnated on the activated carbon in a range of 0-25 % by weight.

22. The filter media substrate of claim 20 wherein the one or more metal oxides comprises a Group 4 metal selected from a group consisting of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, rutherfordium, or any combination thereof.

23. The filter media substrate of claim 20 wherein the one or more metal oxides comprises a Group 6 metal selected from a group consisting of chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, seaborgium, or any combination thereof.

24. The filter media substrate of claim 23 wherein the one or more metal oxides is Molybdenum oxide.

25. The filter media substrate of claim 20 wherein the one or more metal oxides comprises a Group 11 metal selected from a group consisting of copper, silver, gold, roentgenium, or any combination thereof.

26. The filter media substrate of claim 25 wherein the one or more metal oxides is copper oxide.

27. The filter media substrate of claim 25 wherein one of the one or more metal oxides is silver oxide.

28. The filter media substrate of claim 20 wherein the one or more metal oxides comprises a Group 12 metal is selected from a group consisting of zinc, cadmium, mercury, copernicium or any combination thereof.

29. The filter media substrate of claim 28 wherein one of the one or more metal oxides is zinc oxide.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0027] The drawings provided herein form part of the specification and illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.

[0028] FIG. 1. Shows a graph of the surface area of impregnated carbon samples prepared by conventional and atomic layer deposition processes, as determined by the BET method.

[0029] FIG. 2. Shows a graph of total pore volume, meso pore volume and micro pore volume of the samples prepared by conventional and ALD processes.

[0030] FIG. 3. Shows a graph of Performance of carbons against phosphene as a function of ZnO loading.

[0031] FIG. 4. Shows a graph of Performance of carbons against hydrogen cyanide as a function of ZnO loading.

[0032] FIG. 5. Shows a graph of Gas Life Performance of ALD carbons against hydrogen cyanide.

[0033] FIG. 6. Shows a graph of Gas Life Performance of ALD carbons against sulfur dioxide.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] This disclosure as a whole may be best understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, drawing descriptions, abstract, background, field of disclosure, and associated headings. It is nevertheless understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is hereby intended. Such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated devices and such further applications of the principles disclosed and illustrated herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one of skill in the art to which this disclosure relates.

[0035] ALD methods require the chemisorption of a precursor compound onto the surface of a substrate. The substrate itself requires the presence of functional groups (such as oxide species) on the surface of the substrate which react with the precursor compound. Preferably, there are a sufficient number of surface functional groups per unit area on the internal pore surfaces of the substrate to provide uniform coverage of the substrate.

[0036] The surface of most activated carbon is heterogenous and includes a non-uniform distribution of functional groups. The surface of the activated carbon may be pretreated to change the surface chemistry to optimize the ALD deposition. Pretreatments may include, but are not limited to methods such as acid washing, base washing, chemical or ozone treatment.

[0037] Presently described is a metal-oxide impregnated activated carbon derived from an activated carbon precursor. Activated carbons precursors may be generated from a variety of materials, or combinations thereof, which include but are not limited to peat, lignite, sub bituminous and bituminous coal, anthracite, wood, wood dust, wood flour, cotton, linters, coconut, carbohydrates, petroleum pitch, petroleum coke, coal tar pitch, fruit pits, fruit stones, nut shells, nut pits, sawdust, palm, vegetables such as rice hull or straw, synthetic polymer, natural polymer, or lignocellulosic material. As such, activated carbons vary in pore size and in form. The activated carbon precursors are produced into activated carbon using several methods, for example without limitation: chemical activation, thermal activation, or combinations thereof. The precursor in a preferred embodiment is coal, and more particularly a granular bituminous coal in mesh size distributions suitable for air purification applications. However, any suitable precursor, including those listed herein may be utilized. The activated carbon in a preferred embodiment is bituminous coal-based activated carbon because it is known to be used as a base carbon for the manufacture of respiratory protective carbons used in collective protection and personal protective filters. In a preferred embodiment, the activated carbon is 12×30 mesh bituminous coal, but may be other forms of activated carbon.

[0038] In a preferred embodiment, there is a first precursor compound and a second precursor compound. However, the first precursor compound could be comprised of a single or multiple precursor compound(s) and as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, one, two, or more than two precursor compounds may be used as necessary to obtain the desired ALD coating for the activated carbon.

[0039] More specifically, in a preferred embodiment there is a first precursor gas and a second precursor gas. The first precursor gas could be comprised of a single or multiple precursor gas(es) and as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, one, two, or more than two precursor gas(es) may be used as necessary to obtain the desired ALD coating for the activated carbon.

[0040] Any metal-containing compound suitable for gas phase deposition and subsequent reaction to form a metal or metal oxide may be used as the first precursor compound. For example, in a preferred embodiment, the first precursor compound used in the ALD impregnation may be derived from a transition metal, excluding those transition metals in Group 3. In another preferred embodiment, for example, the precursor compound is derived from zinc, copper, molybdenum. In other preferred embodiments, the precursor compound for zinc compounds is diethylzinc.

[0041] In other embodiments, the carbon maybe pretreated with an acid or a base wash to increase active sites and to facilitate metal oxide depositing.

[0042] In a preferred embodiment, a second precursor compound is also used in the impregnation process. For example, the second precursor compound may be water vapor. However, other gases or vapors may be used as a second precursor compound as would be understood by one skilled in the art to obtain the desired ALD coating for the activated carbon.

[0043] In a preferred embodiment an inert gas may be used in the ALD impregnation process. In particular, as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art, any of the inert gases may be utilized, however, the preferred inert gas is nitrogen or argon.

[0044] The ALD impregnation process generally involves the steps comprising: (1) exposure of the substrate surface to a pulse of the first precursor compound and chemisorption of the first precursor compound onto the substrate, (2) purge of inert gas to remove the excess of unreacted precursor compound, (3) introduction of the second precursor compound followed by surface reaction to produce the desired species bonded to the surface of the substrate, and (4) inert gas purge to expel gaseous reaction by-products.

[0045] In a preferred embodiment, the first precursor compound and the second precursor compound are one or more gaseous precursor compounds.

[0046] More particularly, an activated carbon can be prepared by ALD according to the steps comprising: (1) exposing the activated carbon to a pulse of the first precursor compound, wherein the first precursor compound is chemically bonded to the activated carbon through chemical adsorption; (2) applying a purge of inert gas to remove the excess of unreacted first precursor compound, (3) exposing the activated carbon to a second precursor compound, wherein a surface reaction between the activated carbon and the second precursor compound produces a desired species bonded to the surface of the activated carbon, and (4) applying a purge of inert gas to expel gaseous reaction by-products.

[0047] In a preferred embodiment, the first precursor compound and the second precursor compound are one or more gaseous precursor compounds.

[0048] In another preferred embodiment, as is shown in more detail in the following example, the ALD impregnation process first involves exposing the substrate, a U.S. Standard Sieve number range 12×30 mesh bituminous coal, to a pulse of the first precursor compound, diethylzinc, which is chemically bonded to the bituminous coal through chemical adsorption. Second, an inert gas is applied to remove the unreacted first precursor compound. Third, the already treated 12×30 mesh bituminous coal is exposed to the second precursor compound, water vapor, to produce the desired ALD coating, zinc oxide, on the 12×30 mesh bituminous coal. Finally, an inert gas, is applied to expel the resulting reaction by-product, ethane.

[0049] In a preferred embodiment, the optimal range of zinc oxide on the activated carbon is 0.5 to 15% by weight. It is understood that the amount of metal oxide may be applied alone or in combination with one or more other desired metal oxides or metals in amounts suitable for Whetlerite type activated carbons.

[0050] In another preferred embodiment, the ALD impregnation process first involves exposing the substrate, 12×30 mesh bituminous coal, to a pulse of the first precursor compound, copper, which is chemically bonded to the bituminous coal. Second, an inert gas is applied to remove the unreacted first precursor compound. Third, the already treated 12×30 mesh bituminous coal is exposed to an oxidizing source to produce the desired ALD coating, copper oxide, on the 12×30 mesh bituminous coal.

[0051] In a preferred embodiment, the optimal range of copper oxide on the activated carbon is 0.5 to 15% by weight. It is understood that the amount of metal oxide may be applied alone or in combination with one or more other desired metal oxides or metals in amounts suitable for Whetlerite type activated carbons.

[0052] In another preferred embodiment, the activated carbon created in the ALD impregnation process may contain 0.5 to 15% zinc oxide, 0.5 to 15% copper oxide, 0.1 to 5% molybdenum oxide, and 0.01 to 5% silver oxide by weight. It is understood that the combination of multiple metals may be advantageous for the reduction of numerous contaminants.

[0053] Applying the ALD impregnation may be done on a smaller or large scale level. For example, on a smaller level, impregnation can occur through the use of a small volume, evacuated fluidized bed chamber. As another example, impregnation can occur, through the use of a rotary tool which is performed under a vacuum, and mechanically mixes the carbon by rotation of a chamber to ensure uniform exposure to the reactants.

[0054] For both the fluidized bed and rotary tool methods, the substrate activated carbon is loaded into the equipment chamber. The chamber is evacuated to facilitate application of the precursor compound and prevent any gas phase reaction prior to deposition on the substrate surface. The substrate may be dried under vacuum to remove any residual adsorbed water if desired. The first precursor compound is introduced to the evacuated chamber in an amount that targets the desired weight of metal oxide, for example in the range of 1 to 15% by weight. The precursor compound concentration in the chamber can be monitored using mass spectrometry and indicates when the precursor compound concentration has dropped, indicating reaction with the carbon surface. A purge with inert gas is then conducted, followed by introduction of the second precursor compound, for example, water vapor, which reacts with the first precursor compound on the surface to yield metal oxide. The mass spectrometer also monitors the concentration of reaction by-products, and in the final step the chamber is purged of those by-products, the nature of which are determined by the first precursor compound and second precursor compound. For example ethane and water vapor can be part of the by-products of a diethylzinc first precursor compound and water vapor second precursor compound. At the completion of all deposition cycles, the chamber is returned to ambient pressure and the finished product is removed from the chamber.

[0055] On a large scale level, ALD coating may be done using equipment that accommodates larger batches of substrate material and equipment to introduce larger amounts of reactants but uses fundamentally the same process as the small-scale equipment. Other large scale designs may use a semi-continuous process where multiple evacuated chambers in series are used to effect the steps in the deposition process, and the substrate material is transferred through the series of chambers to yield the final product.

Representative Example. ZnO Sample Preparation

[0056] A study was conducted in an effort to compare conventional metal oxide impregnation which was detailed in the prior art with ALD metal oxide impregnation. Specifically, after using conventional impregnation and ALD impregnation, the resultant samples were subjected to various quantitative methods to compare the impregnant application performance by comparing sample factors such as bulk density, surface area, pore volumes, zinc oxide content, contaminant breakthrough time, and ageing studies.

[0057] For this study, the conventional impregnation samples were manufactured on lab scale equipment generating approximately 1 kg of total material. The conventional impregnation samples were prepared by solution impregnation, wherein zinc carbonate was dissolved in an ammoniacal solution and applied to the substrate activated carbon, specifically 12×30 mesh bituminous coal. The carbon was dried to remove water and ammonia, followed by a thermal treatment. The thermal treatment causes decomposition of the zinc salts to form zinc oxide. A range of zinc oxide loadings from approximately 1%-7.5% by weight were targeted on the activated carbon substrate using this method. Specifically, four samples were used with target loading ranges of 1.0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, and 7.5%. ALD impregnation samples were produced using two types of equipment. First, a research scale fluidized bed reactor generated two 60 gram samples. The target loadings of the two samples were 2.5% and 5.0% zinc oxide. Second, a rotary pilot scale tool was used and generated two 1 kg samples. Target loadings for these two samples were 5.0% and 7.5% zinc oxide. With both types of equipment, identical ALD materials were used.

[0058] The ALD deposition method involved the following steps using both types of equipment. First, the substrate (12×30 mesh bituminous coal) was exposed to a pulse of the first precursor diethylzinc, and chemisorption of the first precursor into the substrate. Second, a purge of inert gas was used to remove the excess of the unreacted precursor. Third, a second precursor, water vapor, was introduced, which caused a surface reaction to produce the desired species zinc oxide, bonded to the surface of the substrate. Fourth, the inert gas was again purged to expel gaseous reaction by-products.

[0059] The chemical process which takes place under either the fluidized bed reactor or the rotary pilot scale tool is described with the following reactions, wherein [S] is the activated carbon substrate:

##STR00001##

##STR00002##

Specifically, as the first precursor diethylzinc reacts with the12×30 mesh bituminous coal, ethane and ethylene are released. Then, the water vapor is added to create the surface reaction and create the wanted ALD coating, the zinc oxide. Thus, the overall reaction is deposition of diethylzinc in the gas phase, and conversion to zinc oxide on the carbon surfaces by reaction with water, followed by inert gas purge to expel ethane.

##STR00003##

[0060] A mass spectrometer located downstream to the reaction bed monitored the ALD deposition cycles and confirmed this reaction. Specifically, how each precursor reacts with a particular functional group on the carbon substrate. For example, the diethyl zinc concentration decays and the spike in ethane and ethylene concentration are seen in the mass spectra. In particular, the diethyl zinc mass fragment is recorded, and the ethane and ethylene fragment concentrations are recorded. An understanding of these reactions is required for high precision manufacturing, and as such this confirmation through mass spectrometry is important in optimizing ALD processing.

[0061] The sample preparation phase demonstrated the feasibility of zinc oxide deposition on the high surface area of bituminous coal activated carbon. In fact, both the fluid bed and rotary tools successfully generated functional loadings of zinc oxide on bituminous coal activated carbon. The actual zinc oxide loadings were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectroscopy.

Representative Example. Surface Area and Pore Structure of ZnO Sample

[0062] The physical properties of the samples prepared by the conventional process and ALD process were characterized by conventional methods. Specifically, density was measured by ASTM D2854 Standard Test Method for Apparent Density of Activated Carbon. The samples generally showed increasing density with increasing ZnO loading as expected for both conventional and ALD deposition processes.

[0063] The surface areas and pore volumes were calculated from N.sub.2 isotherm data. Specifically, an analysis of surface areas was performed using a traditional BET-nitrogen adsorption analysis using a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ-XR system. The pore volume analysis was performed using a Quenched Solid Density Functional Theory (QSDFT) slit pore geometry model which calculates pore size taking into account the effects of surface roughness and chemical heterogeneity. Results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 BET surface area and pore volumes Sample Type % ZnO by ICP BET Surface Area m2/g Total Pore Volume cc/g Mesopore Volume cc/g Micropore Volume cc/g Base Carbon Substrate 0.0 1201 0.60 0.16 0.44 Conventional Process 0.9 1159 0.56 0.13 0.43 Conventional Process 2.7 1000 0.53 0.12 0.41 Conventional Process 5.4 985 0.47 0.11 0.36 Conventional Process 7.5 978 0.36 0.12 0.47 ALD Fluid Bed 1.9 1124 0.55 0.13 0.42 ALD Fluid Bed 5.6 961 0.47 0.11 0.36 ALD Rotary Tool 4.4 943 0.47 0.13 0.35 ALD Rotary Tool 5.7 872 0.44 0.11 0.32

[0064] As shown in Table 1, the conventional impregnation method reflected that the total measured surface area decreased with increasing levels of impregnant loadings. This is an expected result in the manufacture of metal impregnated activated carbon. In particular, Table 1 reflects that as the zinc oxide load increased, the total pore volume, mesopore volume, and micropore volume decreased.

[0065] As shown in Table 1, the ALD depositions of zinc oxide revealed similar changes in surface area and pore volume with zinc oxide loading.

[0066] As shown in FIG. 1, the surface area of impregnated carbon samples prepared by conventional and ALD processes, followed the same trendline with ZnO loading. FIG. 2 shows similar results for all of the samples in pore volume analysis. These results strongly support that the ALD deposition process results in deposition on the internal surfaces of the pore structure of the activated carbon and is not an exclusively “line of sight” deposition on the surface of the carbon granules. Impregnation on the internal structure of the carbon is an essential requirement for effective agent/contaminant removal if the activated carbon is used for vapor phase protection against contaminants faced by industrial, military and commercial markets. If the deposition was exclusively on the external surface of granules, very poor agent/contaminant removal would be expected.

Representative Example. Copper Oxide Sample Preparation

[0067] The ALD deposition method involved the following steps using rotary lab scale ALD equipment. The high surface area carbon was coated with copper oxide using a copper precursor. The copper precursor was dosed based on the calculated quantity to achieve the desired copper oxide mass loading. After loading the copper precursor into the reactor, a mass spectrometer was used to periodically sample the chamber. The reaction was determined to be complete once the peaks for byproducts of the reaction all came to a level 3 decades below the carrier gas. After the reaction was complete, the second reactant (i.e., second precursor) was dosed to complete the reaction. The actual copper loadings were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectroscopy.

Representative Example. Copper Oxide and Zinc Oxide Preparation

[0068] A composite coating comprising both copper oxide and zinc oxide was prepared using the following steps. The high surface area carbon was first coated with copper oxide using a copper precursor, as previously described, then subsequently coated with ZnO using the same method as the zinc oxide sample preparation previously described.

[0069] In addition to the example above where copper was deposited first, followed by zinc, it can be performed in the opposite order. The simultaneous application of copper and zinc precursors may also be performed. These variables in order of application of impregnants may affect the performance of the finished products.

Representative Example. Agent Removal Performance Testing - Phosgene

[0070] The ability of ALD-applied impregnants to remove toxic agents from the airstream was compared to the same characteristic under the conventional impregnation method. The metal impregnants increase the reaction and sorbent capacity to remove both agents from the test airstream compared to virgin activated carbon.

[0071] Tube tests were chosen to evaluate the activated carbon sorbents, similar to conditions described in MIL-DTL-32101B specification for ASZM-TEDA. This specification covers activated carbon impregnated with copper, silver, zinc and molybdenum salts and triethylenediamine (TEDA) for use as a sorbent for all known and suspected military chemical weapons agents. The test measures the time required to measure a specified breakthrough concentration of the test agent when exposed to a high incoming concentration. As such, impregnated activated carbon must remove a very high concentration efficiently to reduce the effluent concentration below the breakthrough concentration.

[0072] Reporting for all samples tested is in minutes from the start of the test to the specified breakthrough concentration. As shown in FIG. 3, which depicts performance of carbons against phosgene as a function of ZnO loading, the protection level against phosgene increased with increasing amount of ZnO on the carbon. It also showed similar protection can be achieved with samples prepared by ALD method in comparison to the samples prepared by conventional method. At ZnO loadings above 4%, the ALD sample test times were 83% of the conventional samples test times. As such, a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that optimization of the ALD impregnation methods would likely increase the breakthrough times. FIG. 3 also shows the similarity between ALD samples prepared in a Fluidized Bed and those prepared in a Rotary Tool, showing the capability of preparing Whetlerite carbons by the ALD process for gas phase contaminant protection is independent of the specific reactor configuration.

Representative Example. Agent Removal Performance Testing - Hydrogen Cyanide

[0073] A similar setup for the testing described previously for Phosgene was used to determine the agent removal performance of the ALD prepared carbons against hydrogen cyanide. Reporting for all samples tested is in minutes from the start of the test to the specified breakthrough concentration, which is defined as the sum of HCN and (CN).sub.2 concentration. As shown in FIG. 4, which depicts gas life performance of carbons against hydrogen cyanide as a function of ZnO loading, the protection level against hydrogen cyanide increased with increasing amount of ZnO on the carbon. It also showed the similar protection achieved with samples prepared by ALD method in comparison to the samples prepared by conventional method. In general, the ALD deposition yielded good performance in reaction with hydrogen cyanide when compared to conventional process samples.

[0074] Additional data were collected on ALD prepared carbon samples with copper only, and with combined copper and zinc oxide depositions. In examples depicted in FIG. 5, the gas life performance of ALD carbons against hydrogen cyanide, inform that the ALD prepared samples provide protection against hydrogen cyanide, and the level of protection is dependent on the amount and composition of the metal impregnants.

Representative Example. Agent Removal Performance Testing - Sulfur Dioxide

[0075] In addition to the ability of ALD-applied impregnants to remove toxic agents from the airstream, the ALD-applied agents can also reduce harmful industrial emissions. Specifically, sulfur dioxide (SO.sub.2). This gas was selected because zinc and copper oxides and combinations thereof can also increase the sorbent capacity to reduce SO.sub.2 from test airstreams when compared to virgin activated carbon.

[0076] Reporting for all samples tested are in minutes from the start of the test to the specified breakthrough concentration.. As shown in FIG. 6, the gas life performance of ALD carbons against sulfur dioxide informs that the protection level against sulfur dioxide was highest with the combined zinc and copper oxide impregnation on the carbon. The ALD deposition yielded effective performance in protecting against sulfur dioxide contaminants.

Representative Example. Analysis of Results

[0077] The comparison studies reflect that ALD impregnation is a feasible option for the impregnation of Whetlerite type products. Specifically, the ALD impregnated product had comparable performance to the conventional impregnated products. More particularly, the ALD impregnation method achieved deposition success as determined by the generation of zinc oxide loadings in a desired range. Additionally, the physical properties of the ALD impregnated activated carbon were consistent with those made by the conventional impregnation method. Specifically, the density, surface area, and pore volumes values of the ALD samples were very similar to the conventional samples. Moreover, the toxic and industrial gas reduction tests also showed successful deposition of the impregnants. The test times increased with increasing loading of impregnant, which is a result generally seen with impregnated activated carbons. This supports the ALD impregnation was successful in generating functional impregnants on the base activated carbon. For both hydrogen cyanide and phosgene, the conventional and ALD process yielded comparable results across the range of loadings produced. In addition, the ALD process was capable of reducing a common industrial acid gas, SO.sub.2.

[0078] These results support a broad array of beneficial uses for ALD to impregnate activated carbon with metal, metal oxides, and metal compound impregnates, including gas phase protection against air contaminates and vapor phase protection against air contaminates. These properties support a use of the present disclosure to provide both gas phase and vapor phase protection against chemical warfare agents. The present disclosure will be further beneficial when incorporated into personal protective equipment (PPE), and in collective protective protection equipment by traditional means. The disclosure may, for example be incorporated into PPE to satisfy the standards required by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Europäishe Norm (EN), the safety standards of any national or international governing body, and the safety standards of the U.S. Military. The present disclosure will be beneficial to provide protection against toxic industrial chemicals/materials (TICs/TIMs). As would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, the present disclosure will provide gas and vapor phase protection against air contaminates in commercial, military, and residential situations.

[0079] These results support the use of ALD to impregnate activated carbons with the desired metal, metal oxide and metal compound impregnants. As would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, the present disclosure may use a single metal oxide on activated carbon, two metal oxides or a bimetallic oxide on activated carbon, three metal oxides or a trimetallic oxide on activated carbon, four metal oxides on activated carbon, or any combination of oxides on activated carbon.

[0080] The foregoing examples have been provided merely for the purpose of explanation, and are in no way to be construed as limiting of the present disclosure. While described with reference to various embodiments, it is understood that the words, which have been used herein, are words of description and illustration, rather than words of limitation. Further, although the invention has been described herein with reference to particular means, materials, and embodiments, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particulars set forth herein; rather, the disclosure extends to all functionally equivalent structures, methods and uses. Those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the teachings of this disclosure, may affect numerous modifications thereto and changes may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the aspects hereof.

[0081] Any other undisclosed or incidental details of the construction or composition of the various elements of any embodiment of the present disclosure are not believed to be critical to the achievement of the advantages hereof, so long as the elements possess the attributes needed for them to perform as disclosed. Certainly, one skilled in the field would be able to conceive of a wide variety of alternative configurations and successful combinations thereof. The selection of these and other details of construction are believed to be well within the ability of one of even rudimental skills in this area, in view of the present disclosure. Illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail for the purpose of disclosing a practical, operative composition whereby this disclosure may be practiced advantageously. The examples described herein are intended to be exemplary only. The novel characteristics of the disclosure may be incorporated in other forms without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. This disclosure encompasses embodiments both comprising and consisting of the elements described with reference to the illustrative embodiments. All technical terms shall take on their customary meaning as established by the appropriate technical discipline utilized by those normally skilled in that particular art area.