High-Performance Metal-Organic Frameworks As Methane Sorbents And Computational Identification Methods

Abstract

A natural gas storage material is provided that comprises a porous metal-organic framework (MOF) material having one or more sites for reversibly storing natural gas that contains methane. In certain variations, the MOF has a usable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. In other variations, suitable MOFs having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane with advantageous natural gas storage capabilities are selected from the group consisting of: UMCM-152, DUT-23-Cu, VEBHUG_SL, FUYCIN, ja074366osi20070816_031204, XIYYEL, cg500192d_si_003, VUSKAW, VUSKEA, PEVQOY, EDUSIF, and combinations thereof. Natural gas storage systems and methods of reversibly storing natural gas in such MOFs are also provided.

Claims

1. A natural gas storage material comprising: a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane and having a usable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

2. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material has a gravimetric surface area of greater than or equal to about 2,000 m.sup.2/g.

3. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material has a pore volume of greater than or equal to about 1 cm.sup.3/g to less than or equal to about 2.2 cm.sup.3/g.

4. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material comprises pores having an average pore diameter of greater than or equal to about 7 Angstrom to less than or equal to about 20 Angstrom.

5. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material has a volumetric surface area of greater than or equal to about 1,800 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 2,700 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3.

6. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material has a single crystal density of greater than or equal to about 0.4 g/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 1 g/cm.sup.3.

7. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material has a void fraction of greater than or equal to about 0.7 to less than or equal to about 0.85.

8. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152) or catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu).

9. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the usable methane storage capacity is greater than or equal to about 216 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3.

10. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the metal-organic framework is activated by treatment with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2).

11. The natural gas storage material of claim 1, wherein the gas comprises a mixture of methane and at least one other gas.

12. The natural gas storage material of claim 11, wherein the gas is derived from natural gas.

13. A natural gas storage material comprising: a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane selected from the group consisting of: catena-(([t8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof.

14. The natural gas storage material of claim 13, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), and combinations thereof.

15. The natural gas storage material of claim 13, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof.

16. The natural gas storage material of claim 13, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu), catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), and combinations thereof.

17. The natural gas storage material of claim 13, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), and combinations thereof.

18. A natural gas storage system comprising: a vessel having at least one port for fluid communication and a storage cavity; and a porous metal-organic framework material disposed in storage cavity of the vessel, the porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane and having a usuable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is capable of reversibly storing a gas comprising methane via adsorption and desorption within the storage cavity of the vessel.

19. The natural gas storage system of claim 18, wherein the porous metal-organic framework material is catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152) or catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu).

20. The natural gas storage system of claim 18, wherein the usable methane storage capacity is greater than or equal to about 216 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3.

Description

DRAWINGS

[0066] The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.

[0067] FIGS. 1A-1B show usable volumetric capacity of coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS) and non-CUS metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as a function of gravimetric capacity at 298 K under pressure swing between 5 and 65 bar shown in FIGS. 1A and 5 and 80 bar shown in FIG. 1B.

[0068] FIGS. 2A-2C show crystal structures of select MOFs prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure and assessed for methane uptake. FIG. 2A shows UTSA-76, FIG. 2B shows UMCM-152, and FIG. 2C shows DUT-23-Cu.

[0069] FIG. 3 shows a reaction scheme for forming a ligand (organic linker) (H.sub.4L2) for UTSA-76.

[0070] FIGS. 4A-4B show reaction schemes for forming a UMCM-152 MOF. FIG. 4A shows a reaction scheme for forming a ligand (organic linker) (H.sub.4L1) for UMCM-152. FIG. 4B shows overall UMCM-152 MOF synthesis.

[0071] FIGS. 5A-5B show high pressure CH.sub.4 isotherms. FIG. 5A shows a measured total methane volumetric capacity and FIG. 5B shows gravimetric plots for UTSA-76, UMCM-152 and DUT-23-Cu MOFs. For comparison, an isotherm of HKUST-1 is also shown.

[0072] FIGS. 6A-6B show a comparison of measured usable methane capacities of top performing MOFs, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, DUT-23-Cu and UMCM-152 on a volumetric basis (FIG. 6A) and gravimetric basis (FIG. 6B). Capacities are reported under a pressure swing of 80-5 bar at 298 K.

[0073] FIG. 7 shows a chart of volumetric methane uptake (cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3 versus pressure (bar) diagram demonstrating principles of usuable methane capacity for a metal-organic framework.

[0074] FIG. 8 shows a reaction scheme for forming a DUT-23-Cu MOF in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0075] FIG. 9 shows a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm at 77 K and 1 atm pressure of UMCM-152 MOF. The BET surface area was determined to be 3430 ± 30 m.sup.2/g (0.02<P/P.sub.0<0.05).

[0076] FIG. 10 shows a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm at 77 K and 1 atm pressure of DUT-23-Cu prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure. The BET surface area was determined to be 5,300 ± 50 m.sup.2/g (0.06<P/P.sub.0<0.08).

[0077] FIG. 11 shows an experimental demonstration of methane adsorption isotherm of DUT-23-Cu MOF with methane uptake (cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3) versus pressure (bar) prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0078] FIG. 12 shows an experimental demonstration of methane adsorption isotherm of UMCM-152 MOF with methane uptake (cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3) versus pressure (bar) prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0079] FIGS. 13A-13F show usable various properties for coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS) and non-CUS metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). FIG. 13A shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g), FIG. 13B shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus pore volume (cm.sup.3/g), FIG. 13C shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus pore diameter (Å), FIG. 13D shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3), FIG. 13E shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus single crystal density (g/cm.sup.3), and FIG. 13F shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) versus void fraction.

[0080] FIG. 14 shows an example of a natural gas storage system having at least one metal-organic framework (MOF) prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0081] Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0082] Example embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough, and will fully convey the scope to those who are skilled in the art. Numerous specific details are set forth such as examples of specific compositions, components, devices, and methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that specific details need not be employed, that example embodiments may be embodied in many different forms and that neither should be construed to limit the scope of the disclosure. In some example embodiments, well-known processes, well-known device structures, and well-known technologies are not described in detail.

[0083] The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular example embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” may be intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated features, elements, compositions, steps, integers, operations, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Although the open-ended term “comprising,” is to be understood as a non-restrictive term used to describe and claim various embodiments set forth herein, in certain aspects, the term may alternatively be understood to instead be a more limiting and restrictive term, such as “consisting of” or “consisting essentially of.” Thus, for any given embodiment reciting compositions, materials, components, elements, features, integers, operations, and/or process steps, the present disclosure also specifically includes embodiments consisting of, or consisting essentially of, such recited compositions, materials, components, elements, features, integers, operations, and/or process steps. In the case of “consisting of,” the alternative embodiment excludes any additional compositions, materials, components, elements, features, integers, operations, and/or process steps, while in the case of “consisting essentially of,” any additional compositions, materials, components, elements, features, integers, operations, and/or process steps that materially affect the basic and novel characteristics are excluded from such an embodiment, but any compositions, materials, components, elements, features, integers, operations, and/or process steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics can be included in the embodiment.

[0084] Any method steps, processes, and operations described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed, unless otherwise indicated.

[0085] When a component, element, or layer is referred to as being “on,” “engaged to,” “connected to,” or “coupled to” another element or layer, it may be directly on, engaged, connected or coupled to the other component, element, or layer, or intervening elements or layers may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on,” “directly engaged to,” “directly connected to,” or “directly coupled to” another element or layer, there may be no intervening elements or layers present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements should be interpreted in a like fashion (e.g., “between” versus “directly between,” “adjacent” versus “directly adjacent,” etc.). As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

[0086] Although the terms first, second, third, etc. may be used herein to describe various steps, elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections, these steps, elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections should not be limited by these terms, unless otherwise indicated. These terms may be only used to distinguish one step, element, component, region, layer or section from another step, element, component, region, layer or section. Terms such as “first,” “second,” and other numerical terms when used herein do not imply a sequence or order unless clearly indicated by the context. Thus, a first step, element, component, region, layer or section discussed below could be termed a second step, element, component, region, layer or section without departing from the teachings of the example embodiments.

[0087] Spatially or temporally relative terms, such as “before,” “after,” “inner,” “outer,” “beneath,” “below,” “lower,” “above,” “upper,” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature’s relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. Spatially or temporally relative terms may be intended to encompass different orientations of the device or system in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures.

[0088] Throughout this disclosure, the numerical values represent approximate measures or limits to ranges to encompass minor deviations from the given values and embodiments having about the value mentioned as well as those having exactly the value mentioned. Other than in the working examples provided at the end of the detailed description, all numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; approximately or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. For example, “about” may comprise a variation of less than or equal to 5%, optionally less than or equal to 4%, optionally less than or equal to 3%, optionally less than or equal to 2%, optionally less than or equal to 1%, optionally less than or equal to 0.5%, and in certain aspects, optionally less than or equal to 0.1 %.

[0089] In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range, including endpoints and sub-ranges given for the ranges.

[0090] As used herein, the term “material” refers broadly to a substance containing at least the preferred chemical constituents, elements, or compounds, but which may also comprise additional elements, compounds, or substances, including trace amounts of impurities, unless otherwise indicated.

[0091] The relevant portions of all references and patent literature cited in this application are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

[0092] Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0093] In various aspects, the present disclosure contemplates a gas storage material comprising a metal-organic framework. In particular, a natural gas storage material is provided that comprises a porous metal-organic framework (MOF) material. A metal-organic framework may comprise a plurality of metal clusters and a plurality of multidentate linking ligands that connect adjacent metal clusters. Each metal cluster may include one or more metal ions and at least one open metal site. Advantageously, the metal-organic framework includes one or more sites for storing gas molecules. In this embodiment, the one or more sites include the at least one open metal site. In certain variations, the one or more sites are capable of reversibly storing methane, for example, storing methane in the one or more sites during an adsorption process and releasing methane from the one or more sites during a desorption process. It should be appreciated that in reversibly storing gas, like methane, it is desirable that the storage material releases a practical volume of methane molecules during desorption at regular operating conditions, although the entirety of the volume of adsorbed molecules may not be fully released and some may remain in the adsorbed state associated with the one or more metal sites (which may be released and desorbed at different conditions).

[0094] Generally, natural gas storage materials have a usable storage capacity represented by a methane storage capacity (as methane is the predominant component of natural gas). A methane storage capacity may be defined by the pressure swing conditions for adsorption and desorption. In certain variations, as will be described herein, the MOF natural gas storage material has a methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

[0095] By way of background, as noted above, tens of thousands of MOFs have been synthesized and millions of MOFs are possible, but are yet to be synthesized in the laboratory. Of the tens of thousands of synthesized MOFs, only a fraction has been examined experimentally as potential methane/NG sorbents. It is time consuming and laborious to fabricate MOFs and test their ability to adsorb and desorb methane/NG in a laboratory setting. Thus, it would be advantageous to identify particularly useful MOFs having high methane storage capacity without requiring synthesis and testing. In certain aspects of the present disclosure, computational screening is employed as a tool for identifying optimal MOFs for ANG. For example, high-throughput Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations are used to identify promising MOFs for methane storage. As will be discussed further herein, as validation, some of the MOFs identified through this computational screening are synthesized and methane uptake measurements reveal that three of these MOFs - UTSA-76, UMCM-152 and DUT-23-Cu -surpass the methane capacity of HKUST-1 and provide superior natural gas/methane storage materials. Very recently, MFU-41-Li was demonstrated to surpass HKUST-1 at 5-100 bar at 296 K. For initial data, FIG. 1A shows the predicted usable methane (CH.sub.4) capacities for 11,185 MOFs from the CoRE (2019) database at 298 K calculated using GCMC, as described in Peng, Y., et al. “Methane Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks: Current Records, Surprise Findings, and Challenges.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, pp. 11887-11894 (2013).

[0096] The database includes MOFs with and without coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS). Initial screening was performed with the DREIDING(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) potential for non-CUS MOFs and with a potential that accounts for CH.sub.4-CUS interactions. These data are shown in FIGS. 1A-1B. Subsequently, a portion of this data set was reevaluated with an additional set of interatomic potentials: UFF(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) for non-CUS MOFs and UFF(MOF)/9-site(CH.sub.4) for CUS MOFs. These potentials yielded superior agreement with the isotherms measured for the MOFs examined in certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0097] The concept of usable methane capacity is shown in FIG. 7, where volumetric methane uptake (cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3) versus pressure (bar) shows the usuable capacity of a storage material is greater than 5 bar to less than 65 bar or alternatively 80 bar for a given isotherm of a metal-organic framework. As described herein, typically low pressure methane (e.g., released below 5 bar) does not contribute meaningfully to fuel delivered from a storage vessel or tank.

[0098] Table 1 shows calculated data using the latter choice of interatomic potentials, namely usuable CH.sub.4 capacities and crystallographic properties of high-capacity MOFs.

TABLE-US-00001 MOF Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2 g.sup.-1) Pore volume (cm.sup.3 g.sup.-1) Pressure swing 65 .fwdarw. 5 bar, 298K Pressure swing 80 .fwdarw. 5 bar, 298K Gravimetric capacity (g g.sup.-1) Volumetric capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) Gravimetric capacity (g g.sup.-1 ) Volumetric capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) Expt./Calc. Expt./Calc. Expt./Calc. Expt./Calc. Expt./Calc. Expt./Calc. HKUST-1.sup.a 1850/2159 0.78/0.81 0.154/0.150 190/184 0.162/0.158 200/195 UTSA-76 (Example) 2700/3205 1.09/1.08 0.200/0.194 195/189 0.215/0.207 210/201 UMCM-152 (Example) 3430/3480 1.45/1.38 0.247/0.259 207/205 0.271/0.276 226/219 DUT-23-Cu (Example) 5300/4636 2.23/1.99 0.332/0.333 190/192 0.377/0.361 216/208 .sup.aUsable capacities of HKUST-1 under 65/5 and 80/5 bar pressure swing were collected from the Peng et al. reference and Mason, J., et al., “Evaluating metal-organic frameworks for natural gas storage,” Chem. Sci., 5, pp. 32-51 (2014). Measured crystallographic properties of HKUST-1 were collected from the Peng et al. reference.

[0099] Calculation of crystallographic properties of MOFs is conducted in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure as follows. The crystallographic properties of all MOFs were calculated using the Zeo++ code, which employs Voronoi tessellation techniques to evaluate properties related to MOF porosity. A nitrogen molecule with kinetic diameter of 3.72 Å was used as a probe to calculate the surface area per unit mass (gravimetric surface area: gsa) and per unit volume (volumetric surface area: vsa), the largest cavity diameter (lcd), and pore limiting diameter (pld).

[0100] Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) calculations. The CH.sub.4 capacities of MOFs were computed using GCMC as implemented in the RASPA code. CH.sub.4 adsorption was calculated at 298 K for pressures of 5, 65, and 80 bar. For selected MOFs, full isotherms were evaluated. CH.sub.4 capacity at a given temperature and pressure was evaluated by averaging the number of CH.sub.4 molecules in the simulation cell over multiple GCMC cycles. At each cycle, translation, insertion and deletion of CH.sub.4 molecules were performed with equal probabilities. For CUS MOFs using the quantum-mechanically tuned MOMs potential,9 and for MOFs without CUS, CH.sub.4 isotherm data was collected from 3,000 production cycles, preceded by 2,000 initialization cycles. For CUS MOFs where the UFF(MOF)/9-site(CH.sub.4) potential was used, electrostatic interactions between MOF and CH.sub.4 molecules were accounted for using an Ewald summation; charges on the MOF atoms were calculated using the “charge equilibration” (Qeq) method. In this case, CH.sub.4 adsorption isotherm data was collected from 6,000 production cycles, preceded by 4,000 initialization cycles. All MOFs were treated as rigid frameworks during CH.sub.4 uptake calculations.

[0101] Computational screening. 11,185 previously synthesized MOFs were screened from the CoRE18 (2019) database using GCMC calculations. Among these MOFs, 7,351 contain CUS, and 3,834 are non-CUS MOFs. Screening results based on the MOMs (Michigan Open Metal Site) potential for the CUS MOFs are presented in FIG. 1 and in Tables 2 and 3. FIG. 1 and Tables 2 and 3 present similar results for the non-CUS MOFs as calculated with the DREIDING(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) interatomic potential. Subsequently, a sub-set of this data set was reevaluated with an additional set of interatomic potentials: UFF(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) for non-CUS MOFs and the UFF(MOF)/9-site(CH.sub.4) for CUS MOFs. This choice of potentials yielded superior agreement with the isotherms measured for the MOFs examined here (Table 1).

[0102] Two isothermal “pressure swing” operating conditions at 298 K are considered: a swing between 65 and 5 bar, and between 80 and 5 bar. From these calculations, 95 CUS MOFs are predicted to surpass both usable volumetric and gravimetric CH.sub.4 capacities of HKUST-1 (190 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 & 0.154 g g.sup.-1) for a pressure swing between 65 and 5 bar, while 96 CUS MOFs outperform HKUST-1 (200 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.3 & 0.162 g g.sup.-1) for a pressure swing of 80 to 5 bar, as reflected in Tables 1 and 2.

[0103] Table 2 shows usable capacities (pressure swing between 65 and 5 bar) and crystallographic properties of the top 50 CUS MOFs. Screening was conducted based on the MOMs interatomic potential.

TABLE-US-00002 MOF Name Source Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) Usable gravimetric capacity (g/g) Usable volumetric capacity (cm.sup.3 STP/cm.sup.3) HKUST-1 0.154 190 NAFSOF CoRE (2019) 0.44 5220 2285 0.82 1.9 10.4 8.3 0.358 219 RICBEM CoRE (2019) 0.40 5705 2277 0.82 2.1 11.4 8.6 0.385 215 RAYMIP CoRE (2019) 0.50 4196 2110 0.81 1.6 13.5 9.8 0.305 214 MIXZOK CoRE (2019) 0.45 4658 2109 0.81 1.8 13.2 9.8 0.339 214 BICPUA CoRE (2019) 0.54 3872 2106 0.82 1.5 13.8 9.9 0.281 214 HAVZIP CoRE (2019) 0.42 4690 1955 0.82 2.0 13.0 9.6 0.366 213 ZAHLEC CoRE (2019) 0.50 5357 2701 0.81 1.6 10.7 8.4 0.302 213 ic800131r -file003 CoRE (2019) 0.42 4750 1983 0.82 2.0 12.9 9.6 0.364 212 IDEYOF CoRE (2019) 0.43 5779 2478 0.81 1.9 10.0 6.2 0.355 212 RAYMOV CoRE (2019) 0.42 4982 2113 0.81 1.9 13.9 9.7 0.357 211 MAHCEG CoRE (2019) 0.53 4046 2149 0.81 1.5 18.5 8.0 0.285 211 BEWCUD CoRE (2019) 0.48 4457 2124 0.82 1.7 11.4 9.6 0.317 211 FISGOF CoRE (2019) 0.43 4624 2007 0.84 1.9 15.8 8.6 0.348 211 XOVPUU CoRE (2019) 0.40 4969 2012 0.84 2.1 11.5 9.8 0.370 209 TOVJAR CoRE (2019) 0.52 4005 2068 0.81 1.6 12.4 8.5 0.289 208 JOGSAA CoRE (2019) 0.42 4728 1990 0.82 2.0 13.0 9.4 0.354 208 BAZFUF CoRE (2019) 0.34 5368 1825 0.86 2.5 20.2 8.6 0.437 208 XEBHOC CoRE (2019) 0.47 4693 2182 0.81 1.7 12.1 9.9 0.320 208 TOVJIZ CoRE (2019) 0.45 4504 2032 0.80 1.8 12.7 8.3 0.329 207 BAZFUF01 CoRE (2019) 0.34 5354 1831 0.86 2.5 20.1 8.5 0.432 207 XAWVUN CoRE (2019) 0.46 4721 2192 0.81 1.7 10.8 9.2 0.317 206 ZIJSAO CoRE (2019) 0.47 4735 2204 0.81 1.7 20.3 7.5 0.316 206 POHWIU CoRE (2019) 0.46 4230 1949 0.81 1.8 15.9 10.4 0.319 206 LURRIA CoRE (2019) 0.41 4611 1874 0.83 2.1 22.4 9.7 0.362 206 VOLRAQ01 CoRE (2019) 0.56 3315 1861 0.84 1.5 16.9 11.2 0.262 205 ANUGIA CoRE (2019) 0.57 4061 2306 0.79 1.4 13.9 6.8 0.258 205 SETTAO CoRE (2019) 0.53 3851 2057 0.79 1.5 13.9 10.0 0.274 205 ANUGOG CoRE (2019) 0.58 4228 2472 0.79 1.4 11.4 7.1 0.249 204 XAFFER CoRE (2019) 0.36 5153 1854 0.85 2.4 14.2 13.3 0.405 203 FATQID CoRE (2019) 0.61 3634 2205 0.80 1.3 11.5 8.6 0.240 203 TOVJEV CoRE (2019) 0.40 4737 1893 0.84 2.1 13.7 10.4 0.364 203 XAFFAN CoRE (2019) 0.37 5192 1896 0.85 2.3 14.9 13.2 0.398 203 ENIHUG01 CoRE (2019) 0.59 3971 2323 0.77 1.3 13.8 6.8 0.248 203 WAVQOB CoRE (2019) 0.66 2985 1981 0.77 1.2 10.3 8.2 0.219 203 EFAYIU CoRE (2019) 0.43 5192 2251 0.82 1.9 11.6 8.6 0.335 203 CAVPUM CoRE (2019) 0.41 4768 1943 0.82 2.0 20.4 7.8 0.356 202 VAGMAT CoRE (2019) 0.36 5141 1875 0.86 2.4 14.9 13.3 0.397 202 NAYZOE CoRE (2019) 0.50 4615 2302 0.81 1.6 15.8 6.5 0.290 202 ATEYED CoRE (2019) 0.47 7061 3303 0.78 1.7 7.5 6.2 0.309 202 MINCUJ CoRE (2019) 0.69 2920 2024 0.76 1.1 12.0 7.6 0.208 202 VAGMEX CoRE (2019) 0.35 5189 1828 0.86 2.5 15.3 14.5 0.410 202 ANUGEW CoRE (2019) 0.44 4709 2088 0.83 1.9 14.4 10.2 0.325 201 ACUFEK CoRE (2019) 0.56 3942 2205 0.79 1.4 15.6 9.0 0.258 201 ENIHUG CoRE (2019) 0.58 4025 2341 0.79 1.4 13.8 6.8 0.247 201 ASIVAB CoRE (2019) 0.54 4325 2328 0.80 1.5 12.3 7.3 0.267 201 DICKEH CoRE (2019) 0.52 4507 2355 0.80 1.5 12.8 7.4 0.274 200 YIPDOR CoRE (2019) 0.45 5445 2441 0.80 1.8 10.3 7.5 0.318 199 XAFFOB CoRE (2019) 0.37 5119 1879 0.85 2.3 14.8 13.2 0.389 199 RUVKAV CoRE (2019) 0.60 3706 2230 0.78 1.3 12.0 7.2 0.236 199 VANNIK CoRE (2019) 0.49 3703 1808 0.85 1.7 12.1 10.7 0.291 199

[0104] Table 3 shows usable capacities (pressure swing between 80 and 5 bar) and crystallographic properties of the top 50 CUS MOFs. Screening was conducted based on the MOMs interatomic potential.

TABLE-US-00003 MOF Name Source Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) Usable gravimetric capacity (g/g) Usable volumetric capacity (cm.sup.3 STP/ cm.sup.3) HKUST-1 0.162 200 NAFSOF CoRE (2019) 0.44 5220 2285 0.82 1.9 10.4 8.3 0.380 232 RICBEM CoRE (2019) 0.40 5705 2277 0.82 2.1 11.4 8.6 0.414 231 BAZFUF CoRE (2019) 0.34 5368 1825 0.86 2.5 20.2 8.6 0.482 229 BAZFUF01 CoRE (2019) 0.34 5354 1831 0.86 2.5 20.1 8.5 0.477 228 HAVZIP CoRE (2019) 0.42 4690 1955 0.82 2.0 13.0 9.6 0.391 228 BICPUA CoRE (2019) 0.54 3872 2106 0.82 1.5 13.8 9.9 0.300 228 FISGOF CoRE (2019) 0.43 4624 2007 0.84 1.9 15.8 8.6 0.375 227 RAYMOV CoRE (2019) 0.42 4982 2113 0.81 1.9 13.9 9.7 0.383 227 MIXZOK CoRE (2019) 0.45 4658 2109 0.81 1.8 13.2 9.8 0.359 227 ic800131r-file003 CoRE (2019) 0.42 4750 1983 0.82 2.0 12.9 9.6 0.389 227 IDEYOF CoRE (2019) 0.43 5779 2478 0.81 1.9 10.0 6.2 0.378 226 XOVPUU CoRE (2019) 0.40 4969 2012 0.84 2.1 11.5 9.8 0.400 226 VOLRAQ01 CoRE (2019) 0.56 3315 1861 0.84 1.5 16.9 11.2 0.288 226 RAYMIP CoRE (2019) 0.50 4196 2110 0.81 1.6 13.5 9.8 0.322 226 BEWCUD CoRE (2019) 0.48 4457 2124 0.82 1.7 11.4 9.6 0.338 225 ZAHLEC CoRE (2019) 0.50 5357 2701 0.81 1.6 10.7 8.4 0.319 225 JOGSAA CoRE (2019) 0.42 4728 1990 0.82 2.0 13.0 9.4 0.382 225 MAHCEG CoRE (2019) 0.53 4046 2149 0.81 1.5 18.5 8.0 0.302 224 TOVJAR CoRE (2019) 0.52 4005 2068 0.81 1.6 12.4 8.5 0.310 224 LURRIA CoRE (2019) 0.41 4611 1874 0.83 2.1 22.4 9.7 0.392 223 TOVJEV CoRE (2019) 0.40 4737 1893 0.84 2.1 13.7 10.4 0.397 221 XEBHOC CoRE (2019) 0.47 4693 2182 0.81 1.7 12.1 9.9 0.341 221 POHWIU CoRE (2019) 0.46 4230 1949 0.81 1.8 15.9 10.4 0.343 221 TOVJIZ CoRE (2019) 0.45 4504 2032 0.80 1.8 12.7 8.3 0.350 221 XAFFER CoRE (2019) 0.36 5153 1854 0.85 2.4 14.2 13.3 0.439 221 VAGMAT CoRE (2019) 0.36 5141 1875 0.86 2.4 14.9 13.3 0.433 220 XAWVUN CoRE (2019) 0.46 4721 2192 0.81 1.7 10.8 9.2 0.340 220 XAFFAN CoRE (2019) 0.37 5192 1896 0.85 2.3 14.9 13.2 0.432 220 ZIJSAO CoRE (2019) 0.47 4735 2204 0.81 1.7 20.3 7.5 0.338 220 VANNIK CoRE (2019) 0.49 3703 1808 0.85 1.7 12.1 10.7 0.322 220 ANUGEW CoRE (2019) 0.44 4709 2088 0.83 1.9 14.4 10.2 0.354 219 VAGMEX CoRE (2019) 0.35 5189 1828 0.86 2.5 15.3 14.5 0.446 219 FIFGEI CoRE (2019) 0.41 4211 1738 0.86 2.1 16.2 14.7 0.380 219 CAVPUM CoRE (2019) 0.41 4768 1943 0.82 2.0 20.4 7.8 0.385 219 SETTAO CoRE (2019) 0.53 3851 2057 0.79 1.5 13.9 10.0 0.292 218 EFAYIU CoRE (2019) 0.43 5192 2251 0.82 1.9 11.6 8.6 0.359 217 ANUGIA CoRE (2019) 0.57 4061 2306 0.79 1.4 13.9 6.8 0.273 217 XAFFOB CoRE (2019) 0.37 5119 1879 0.85 2.3 14.8 13.2 0.423 217 FATQID CoRE (2019) 0.61 3634 2205 0.80 1.3 11.5 8.6 0.256 217 XAFFIV CoRE (2019) 0.36 5300 1899 0.85 2.4 14.2 13.2 0.431 216 ANUGOG CoRE (2019) 0.58 4228 2472 0.79 1.4 11.4 7.1 0.263 215 NAYZOE CoRE (2019) 0.50 4615 2302 0.81 1.6 15.8 6.5 0.309 215 DICKEH CoRE (2019) 0.52 4507 2355 0.80 1.5 12.8 7.4 0.294 214 XAHPED CoRE (2019) 0.37 5199 1947 0.84 2.2 12.4 10.9 0.409 214 ASIVAB CoRE (2019) 0.54 4325 2328 0.80 1.5 12.3 7.3 0.284 214 WAVQOB CoRE (2019) 0.66 2985 1981 0.77 1.2 10.3 8.2 0.230 214 MINCUJ CoRE (2019) 0.69 2920 2024 0.76 1.1 12.0 7.6 0.221 213 UDANIY CoRE (2019) 0.42 4181 1745 0.85 2.0 23.9 23.5 0.366 213 ATEYED CoRE (2019) 0.47 7061 3303 0.78 1.7 7.5 6.2 0.325 213 cg500175k_si_001 CoRE (2019) 0.52 3653 1882 0.82 1.6 20.4 9.9 0.295 213

[0105] As referred to herein, Table 4 provides a cross-reference of select MOF names and chemistry used herein. Further, as will be described below, each of the MOFs listed in Table 4 has a better usable methane storage capacity for methane/natural gas storage than the benchmark of HKUST-1 at pressure swing conditions of 65 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption and at 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorptionat 298 K.

TABLE-US-00004 IUPAC Name MOF Category Chemical/Common name of MOF Abbreviation (Called MOFs_Refcode) catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] Non-CUS-MOF IRMOF-20 VEBHUG or a074366_SL catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] CUS-MOF V-CAT-5 FUYCIN catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] Non-CUS-MOF IRMOF-3 ja074366osi20070816 _031204 catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] CUS-MOF no name, compound 1 in paper XIYYEL bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate Non-CUS-MOF porph@MOM-13 cg500192d_si_003 catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate) Non-CUS-MOF MOF-5 VUSKAW catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) Non-CUS-MOF MOF-5 VUSKEA catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) Non-CUS-MOF IRMOF-3-AM4XL PEVQOY catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) Non-CUS-MOF MOF-5 EDUSIF catena-((.Math.8-Biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis(4-carboxylatophenyl))-diaqua-di-copper) CUS-MOF UTSA-68 NAFSOF catena-[(.Math.8-5′,5″-Anthracene-9,10-diylbis(1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-4,4″-dicarboxylato))-di-aqua-di-copper octahydrate] CUS-MOF MOF-la RICBEM catena-[(.Math.12-1,3,5-tris(3,5-di(4-carboxylatophenyl)phenyl)benzene)-(.Math.3-oxo)-triaqua-tri-indium(iii)] CUS-MOF JUC-101 RAYMIP catena-(dimethylammonium (.Math.-1,3,5-tris(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene)-(.Math.-hydroxo)-triaqua-tri-nickel N,N-dimethylacetamide solvate heptahydrate) CUS-MOF JUC-105 MIXZOK catena-[(.Math.12-1,3,5-tris(4,4″-Dicarboxylato-1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-5′-yl)benzene)-(.Math.3-oxo)-triaqua-ytterbium(iii)] CUS-MOF UTSA-62 BICPUA catena-(bis(4,4′-bipyridinium) tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-(.Math.2-oxalato)-diaqua-di-cobalt bis(.Math.9-arsenato)-hexatriacontakis(.Math.2-oxo)-octadecaoxo-octadeca-tungsten dihydrate) non-CUS-MOF no name, compound 1 in paper HAVZIP catena-[tetrakis(.Math.-3-(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzoato))-(.Math.-naphthalene-1,5-disulfonato)-diaqua-tri-copper] non-CUS-MOF fsc-1-NDS ZAHLEC catena-(bis(.Math.2-4,4′-Bipyridine-N,N′)-bis(dihydrogen phosphato)-nickel(ii) n-butanol solvate monohydrate) non-CUS-MOF no name, compound 1 in paper IDEYOF catena-[(.Math..sub.12-1,3,5-tris(3,5-di(4-carboxylatophenyl)phenyl)benzene)-(.Math..sub.3-hydroxo)-triaqua-tri-manganese(ii) CUS-MOF JUC-102 RAYMOV catena-[hexakis(.Math.-10-(4-carboxylatophenyl)-10H-phenoxazine-3,7-dicarboxylato)-bis(.Math.-oxo)-triaqua-tri-copper-octa-zinc CUS-MOF no name, MAHCEG catena-((.Math.17-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3,5-bis(4-carboxylatophenyl)phenyl)porphyrinato)-hexaaqua-penta-zinc N,N-dimethylformamide solvate hexahydrate) non-CUS MOF UNLPF-1 BEWCUD catena-[(.Math.8-5′-((3,5-dicarboxylatophenyl)ethynyl)-1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-4,4″-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper N,N-diethylformamide solvate hydrate] CUS MOF ZJU-32 FISGOF catena-((.Math.8-4,4′,4″,4‴-(2,2′-Dihydroxy-1,1′-biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetrayl)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-copper(ii) N,N-dimethylformamide solvate decahydrate) CUS-MOF no name, compound 3 in paper XOVPUU catena-[tetrakis(.Math.-benzene-1,3,5-tris(4-benzoato))-bis(.Math.-oxo)-hexa-aqua-hexa-iron unknown solvate] CUS-MOF PCN-260 TOVJAR catena-(tris(.Math.2-4,4′-Bipyridine)-(.Math.2-oxalato)-diaqua-di-nickel(ii) bis(.Math.9-phosphato)-hexatriacontakis(.Math.2-oxo)-octadecaoxo-octadeca-tungsten bis(4,4′-bipyridinium) clathrate dihydrate) non-CUS-MOF no name, compound 2 in paper JOGSAA catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoato)-hexaaqua-hexa-copper) CUS-MOF DUT-34 BAZFUF catena-((.Math.8-N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(4-Carboxyphenyl)-1,4-phenylenediamine)-diaqua-di-copper dimethylsulfoxide solvate hexahydrate) CUS-MOF no name, compound 1 in paper XEBHOC catena-[bis(.Math.-2-hydroxy-benzene-1,3,5-tris(4-benzoato))-(.Math.-oxo)-triaqua-tri-iron] CUS-MOF PCN-262 TOVJIZ catena-((.Math.8-rac-D2-N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(4-Carboxyphenyl)-1,4-phenylenediamine)-diaqua-di-copper dimethylsulfoxide solvate hexahydrate) CUS-MOF no name, compound 2 in paper XAWVUN catena-(tris(Dimethylammonium) bis(.Math.6-1,3,5-tris(3,5-bis(4-carboxylatophenyl)phenyl)benzene)-triaqua-tri-terbium dimethylacetamide solvate) CUS-MOF UTSA-61 ZIJSAO catena-[(.Math.17-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4,4″-dicarboxylato-1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-5′-yl)porphyrinato)-(.Math.2-carbon dioxide)-tetra-aqua-penta-cobalt] CUS-MOF UNLPF-2 POHWIU catena-[(.Math.12-1,3,5-tris(4-(3,5-Dicarboxylatophenylethynyl)phenyl)benzene)-triaqua-tri-copper(ii) dimethylformamide solvate hexacosahydrate] CUS-MOF NOTT-116 LURRIA catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] CUS-MOF UMCM-152 ANUGIA catena-[hexakis(.Math.3-Isonicotinamido)-bis(.Math.3-4,4′,4″-[1,3,5-benzenetriyltris(carbonylimino)]tribenzoato)-(.Math.3-oxo)-diaqua-hydroxy-tri-chromium-tri-zinc dimethylformamide solvate non-CUS-MOF tp-PMBB-1-asc-1 SETTAO catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] CUS-MOF UMCM-153 ANUGOG catena-((.Math.8-4,4′,4″,4‴-(biphenyl-4,4′-diyldinitrilo)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-zinc] CUS-MOF DUT-11 XAFFER catena-(hexakis(.Math.4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(.Math.4-oxo)-octa-zinc] CUS-MOF UNLPF-4 FATOID catena-[bis(.Math.-2-amino-benzene-1,3,5-tris(4-benzoato))-(.Math.-oxo)-triaqua-tri-ironi CUS-MOF PCN-261 TOVJEV catena-((.Math.,8 4,4′,4″,4‴-(biphenyl-4,4′-diyldinitrilo)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-zinc] CUS-MOF DUT-10(Zn) XAFFAN catena-((.Math.-5-(2,6-bis(4-carboxylatophenyl)pyridin-4-yl)isophthalato)-diaqua-di-copper] CUS-MOF BUT-20 ENIHUG01 catena-(tetrakis(.Math.8-2,2′-Diethoxy-1,1′-biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis(p-phenylenecarboxylato))-octa-aqua-octa-zinc(ii) octatetracontakis(dimethylformamide) clathrate) CUS-MOF no name, compound 5 in paper EFAYIU catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-4,4′,4″-Benzene-1,3,5-triyltris(benzoato))-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-zinc dimethylformamide solvate hydrate) non-CUS-MOF FJI-1 CAVPUM catena-((.Math.8-4,4′,4″,4‴-(Biphenyl-4,4′-diyldinitrilo)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-zinc dimethylformamide solvate hexahydrate) CUS-MOF SNU-30 VAGMAT catena-[tetrakis(.Math.6-Triphenylamine-4,4′,4″-tricarboxylato)-hexaaqua-hexa-copper methanol solvate octahydrate) CUS-MOF Cu-TCA NAYZOE catena-((2)-(bis(.Math.2-1,4-bis(Imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene)-di-aqua-cobalt(ii))-(bis(.Math.2-1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene)-di-aqua-cobalt(ii))-catenane bis(sulfate) tetradecahydrate) non-CUS-MOF no name, compound 2 in paper ATEYED catena-[(.Math.4-triphenylene-2,6,10-tricarboxylato)-aqua-(propan-1-ol)-terbium propan-1-ol solvate) CUS-MOF SNU-2 MINCUJ catena-((.Math.8-4,4′,4″,4‴-(Biphenyl-4,4′-diyldinitrilo)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-zinc diethylformamide solvate) CUS-MOF SNU-30SC VAGMEX catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-4,4″,5′-tricarboxylato)-hexaaqua-hexa-copper unknown solvate) CUS-MOF UMCM-151 ANUGEW catena-[octakis(.Math.6-4,4′,4″-s-Triazine-2,4,6-triyltribenzoato)-dodecaaqua-dodeca-copper dodecakis(dimethylsulfoxide) hydrate clathrate] CUS-MOF PCN-6 ACUFEK catena-[(.Math.-5-(2,6-bis(4-carboxylatophenyl)pyridin-4-yl)isophthalato)-diaqua-di-copper CUS-MOF Cu-BCP ENIHUG catena-(tetrakis(.Math.-2′-amino-1, 1′:3′,1″-terphenyl-4,4″,5′-tricarboxylato)-hexa-aqua-hexa-copper dimethylformamide CUS-MOF Cu-ATTCA ASIVAB catena-[(.Math.8-5,5′-(1,4-Phenylenediethyne-2,1-diyl)diisophthalato)-diaqua-di-copper CUS-MOF NJU-BAI-12 DICKEH catena-([3]-(bis(bis(.Math.2-4,4′-bis(1,2,4-Triazol-1-yl)biphenyl)-diaqua-copper(ii)) bis(.Math.2-4,4′-bis(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)biphenyl)-di-copper(i))-rotaxane α-(.Math.12-phosphato)-tetracosa(.Math.2-oxo)-dodecaoxo-molybdenum(v)-undeca-molybdum(vi) clathrate) non-CUS-MOF no name, compound 2 in paper YIPDOR catena-((.Math.8-4,4′,4″,4‴-(biphenyl-4,4′-divldinitrilo)tetrabenzoato)-diaqua-di-copper CUS-MOF DUT-10(Cu) XAFFOB catena-[(.Math.8-5,5′-(Butadiyne-1,4-diyl)diisophthalato)-diaqua-di-copper(ii) dimethylformamide solvate trihydrate] CUS-MOF MOF-505 RUVKAV catena-[tetrakis(Dimethylammonium) tris(.Math.-tetrakis(4-carboxylatophenyl)methane)-octa-oxo-tetra-uranium N,N-dimethylformamide solvate hectahydrate] CUS-MOF U-MOF VANNIK catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-cobalt) non-CUS-MOF DUT-23-Co ICAQIO catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) non-CUS-MOF DUT-23-Cu ICAQOU

[0106] By further analysis, a total of about 8 non-CUS MOFs are predicted to surpass HKUST-1, while about 9 are equivalent to HKUST-1′s performance at 85-5 bar pressure swing at 298 K, as reflected in Tables 5 and 6.

[0107] Table 5 shows usable capacities (pressure swing between 65 and 5 bar) and crystallographic properties of 50 promising non-CUS MOFs. Screening is conducted based on the DREIDING(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) interatomic potential.

TABLE-US-00005 MOF Name Source Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/ cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) Usable gravimetric capacity (g/g) Usable volu-metric capacity (cm.sup.3 STP /cm.sup.3) HKUST-1 0.154 190 VEBHUG CoRE (2019) 0.51 3751 1917 0.85 1.7 17.3 9.8 0.271 194 FUYCIN CoRE (2019) 0.44 4293 1877 0.83 1.9 11.4 11.1 0.314 192 ja074366osi 20070816_0 31204 CoRE (2019) 0.60 3703 2203 0.81 1.4 15.0 8.0 0.225 187 PEVQOY CoRE (2019) 0.61 3637 2232 0.81 1.3 14.8 7.9 0.215 184 XIYYEL CoRE (2019) 0.72 3203 2313 0.79 1.1 8.5 8.2 0.185 186 VUSKEA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3687 2193 0.80 1.3 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 VUSKAW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3708 2205 0.80 1.3 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 cg500192d_ si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.55 3732 2069 0.79 1.4 11.2 9.5 0.240 186 EDUSIF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3751 2226 0.81 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.222 184 LAWGOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3785 2231 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 LAWGEW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3769 2230 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.220 182 COXHON CoRE (2019) 0.66 3486 2298 0.80 1.2 8.8 8.5 0.197 182 LAWGIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3776 2230 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.222 183 LAWFOF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3788 2233 0.81 1.4 15.1 8.0 0.220 181 HIFTOG01 CoRE (2019) 0.58 3799 2219 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.222 181 LAWGUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3790 2232 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 LAWFUL CoRE (2019) 0.59 3779 2229 0.81 1.4 15.1 8.0 0.219 180 LAWGAS CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.81 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.219 181 MEJMOE CoRE (2019) 0.62 3622 2232 0.81 1.3 13.4 7.2 0.207 178 NEYVEU CoRE (2019) 0.51 3905 2008 0.80 1.5 20.2 6.4 0.249 179 ja5b00365_ si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.45 4503 2038 0.83 1.8 21.8 7.6 0.282 178 ERIRIG CoRE (2019) 0.43 4770 2036 0.83 1.9 11.7 9.6 0.294 175 ic2017598_ si_001 CoRE (2019) 0.61 3715 2263 0.80 1.3 14.9 7.9 0.210 178 ICAQIO CoRE (2019) 0.40 4746 1915 0.83 2.0 20.4 8.0 0.312 176 PEVQIS CoRE (2019) 0.61 3681 2230 0.81 1.3 14.9 7.8 0.211 178 ICAQOU CoRE (2019) 0.41 4636 1916 0.82 2.0 20.3 7.9 0.303 175 VAZTOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.80 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.213 175 ICAROV CoRE (2019) 0.41 4744 1928 0.82 2.0 20.3 7.9 0.306 174 VAZTUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.81 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.215 178 KULMEK CoRE (2019) 0.66 3438 2269 0.75 1.1 13.2 7.5 0.191 176 PEDRIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3806 2245 0.81 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.210 173 KINSEH CoRE (2019) 0.63 2959 1878 0.75 1.2 12.8 11.5 0.202 179 HAFTOZ CoRE (2019) 0.55 3683 2040 0.78 1.4 15.4 7.5 0.224 173 ja4015666_ si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.71 3127 2225 0.76 1.1 10.1 9.1 0.177 176 ja4015666_ si_005 CoRE (2019) 0.72 3075 2224 0.75 1.0 10.1 9.0 0.175 177 IYOWID CoRE (2019) 0.41 4764 1930 0.82 2.0 20.5 7.7 0.298 169 EDUVOO CoRE (2019) 0.37 4790 1788 0.86 2.3 20.9 10.6 0.317 166 FEFDEB CoRE (2019) 0.54 3959 2135 0.77 1.4 13.1 11.6 0.226 170 ja4015666_ si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.72 3143 2257 0.75 1.0 10.1 9.0 0.175 175 NEXVET CoRE (2019) 0.57 3880 2221 0.81 1.4 15.1 7.9 0.213 170 acs.jpcc.6b0 8594_Zn2C d6MOF5_opt CoRE (2019) 0.63 3422 2151 0.81 1.3 14.7 8.1 0.189 166 LIRFIB CoRE (2019) 0.55 4061 2253 0.80 1.4 9.2 8.8 0.213 165 COXHIH CoRE (2019) 0.71 3273 2311 0.79 1.1 8.6 8.2 0.168 166 CAVPEW CoRE (2019) 0.40 4794 1931 0.82 2.0 20.3 7.8 0.293 165 QAMLEY CoRE (2019) 0.70 3269 2278 0.76 1.1 11.1 6.1 0.177 172 COXHED CoRE (2019) 0.69 3357 2309 0.80 1.2 8.7 8.4 0.171 164 ja5109535_ si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.65 3380 2199 0.77 1.2 17.5 7.7 0.188 171 GURPUF CoRE (2019) 0.70 3384 2357 0.79 1.1 9.5 8.4 0.170 165 CAVPIA CoRE (2019) 0.42 4733 1970 0.81 2.0 19.9 7.8 0.286 166 ic101935f_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.41 5095 2079 0.85 2.1 13.5 8.8 0.286 163

[0108] Table 6 shows usable capacities (pressure swing between 80 and 5 bar) and crystallographic properties of 50 promising non-CUS MOFs. Screening is conducted based on the DREIDING(MOF)/TraPPE(CH.sub.4) interatomic potential.

TABLE-US-00006 MOF Name Source Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Large cavity diameter (Å) HKUST-1 VEBHUG CoRE (2019) 0.51 3751 1917 0.85 1.7 17.3 FUYCIN CoRE (2019) 0.44 4293 1877 0.83 1.9 11.4 ja074366osi20070816_031204 CoRE (2019) 0.60 3703 2203 0.81 1.4 15.0 XIYYEL CoRE (2019) 0.72 3203 2313 0.79 1.1 8.5 cg500192d_si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.55 3732 2069 0.79 1.4 11.2 VUSKAW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3708 2205 0.80 1.3 15.0 VUSKEA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3687 2193 0.80 1.3 15.0 PEVQOY CoRE (2019) 0.61 3637 2232 0.81 1.3 14.8 EDUSIF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3751 2226 0.81 1.4 15.1 LAWGIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3776 2230 0.80 1.4 15.1 LAWGEW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3769 2230 0.80 1.4 15.1 COXHON CoRE (2019) 0.66 3486 2298 0.80 1.2 8.8 LAWGUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3790 2232 0.80 1.4 15.1 LAWGOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3785 2231 0.80 1.4 15.1 LAWFOF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3788 2233 0.81 1.4 15.1 LAWGAS CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.81 1.4 15.1 HIFTOG01 CoRE 0.58 3799 2219 0.80 1.4 15.1 (2019) LAWFUL CoRE (2019) 0.59 3779 2229 0.81 1.4 15.1 KINSEH CoRE (2019) 0.63 2959 1878 0.75 1.2 12.8 NEYVEU CoRE (2019) 0.51 3905 2008 0.80 1.5 20.2 ic2017598_si_001 CoRE (2019) 0.61 3715 2263 0.80 1.3 14.9 PEVQIS CoRE (2019) 0.61 3681 2230 0.81 1.3 14.9 ja5b00365_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.45 4503 2038 0.83 1.8 21.8 MEJMOE CoRE (2019) 0.62 3622 2232 0.81 1.3 13.4 VAZTUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.81 1.4 15.1 ja4015666_si_005 CoRE (2019) 0.72 3075 2224 0.75 1.0 10.1 ja4015666_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.71 3127 2225 0.76 1.1 10.1 KULMEK CoRE (2019) 0.66 3438 2269 0.75 1.1 13.2 ICAQIO CoRE (2019) 0.40 4746 1915 0.83 2.0 20.4 ERIRIG CoRE (2019) 0.43 4770 2036 0.83 1.9 11.7 ICAQOU CoRE (2019) 0.41 4636 1916 0.82 2.0 20.3 ja4015666_si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.72 3143 2257 0.75 1.0 10.1 VAZTOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.80 1.4 15.1 ICAROV CoRE (2019) 0.41 4744 1928 0.82 2.0 20.3 HAFTOZ CoRE (2019) 0.55 3683 2040 0.78 1.4 15.4 PEDRIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3806 2245 0.81 1.4 15.1 QAMLEY CoRE (2019) 0.70 3269 2278 0.76 1.1 11.1 ic502725y_si_004 CoRE (2019) 1.57 1304 2049 0.64 0.4 9.6 ja5109535_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.65 3380 2199 0.77 1.2 17.5 NEXVET CoRE (2019) 0.57 3880 2221 0.81 1.4 15.1 FEFDEB CoRE (2019) 0.54 3959 2135 0.77 1.4 13.1 WECBEN CoRE (2019) 0.99 3144 3119 0.70 0.7 6.5 ABETIN CoRE (2019) 0.60 3811 2276 0.73 1.2 9.5 IYOWID CoRE (2019) 0.41 4764 1930 0.82 2.0 20.5 WUTBEU CoRE (2019) 0.75 2277 1719 0.75 1.0 12.7 KEDJAG04 CoRE (2019) 1.07 2815 3013 0.69 0.6 5.6 KEDJAG14 CoRE (2019) 1.06 2872 3042 0.69 0.7 5.6 KEDJAG10 CoRE (2019) 1.06 2853 3032 0.69 0.7 5.6 KEDJAG16 CoRE (2019) 1.06 2877 3044 0.69 0.7 5.6 KEDJAG18 CoRE (2019) 1.05 2902 3061 0.70 0.7 5.7

[0109] In view of this computational analysis, in certain variations, a natural gas storage material comprises a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu), catena-[(.Math..sub.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math..sub.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof.

[0110] In certain variations, the MOF is selected to have better usable capacity for methane/natural gas storage than HKUST-1, for example, greater than or equal to about 190 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 65 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. Such a material may be selected from the group consisting of: catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), and combinations thereof.

[0111] In yet other variations, the MOF is selected to have a usable capacity for methane/natural gas storage that is equivalent to or better than HKUST-1, for example, greater than or equal to about 200 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. Such a natural gas storage material may comprise a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu), catena-[(.Math..sub.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math..sub.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof.

[0112] In certain other variations, the MOF is selected to have better usable capacity for methane/natural gas storage than HKUST-1, for example, greater than or equal to about 202 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. Such a natural gas storage material may be selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper](UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu), catena-[(.Math..sub.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math..sub.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), and combinations thereof.

[0113] For example, UMCM-152 (catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper]) and DUT-23-Cu (catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper)) are identified through the above-described methodology as select sorbents with the potential to exceed the performance of HKUST-1. Additionally, UTSA-76 was also selected as it appears to be able to outperform HKUST-1 in the pressure range of 5-65 bar. Computational predictions are based on idealized MOF models that typically assume that all solvent, un-reacted salt, and disorder have been removed from the crystal structure. As these components can play a role in stabilizing some MOFs, there is no guarantee that a given MOF can be realized experimentally in its fully activated form. Therefore, experimental validation of predicted high-performance MOFs is performed here to validate the predictive modeling.

[0114] Thus, as will be described herein, remarkable methane uptake is demonstrated experimentally in three metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) identified by this computational screening: UTSA-76, UMCM-152 and DUT-23-Cu. These MOFs outperform the benchmark sorbent, HKUST-1, both volumetrically and gravimetrically for usable methane storage capacity, under a pressure swing of 80 to 5 bar at 298 K. Although high uptake at elevated pressure helps achieve this performance, a low density of high-affinity sites (coordinatively unsaturated metal centers) also contributes to a more complete release of stored gas at low pressure. The identification of these MOFs facilitates the efficient storage of natural gas via adsorption, and provides further evidence of the utility of computational screening in identifying MOFs that may have been overlooked as potential natural gas storage sorbents.

[0115] UTSA-76 (FIG. 2A) was synthesized with a BET surface area of 2,700 m.sup.2/g and pore volume of 1.09 cm.sup.3/g (at P/P.sub.0 = 0.95) (Table 1). More specifically, ligand (organic linker) (H.sub.4L2) synthesis of UTSA-76 is shown in the reaction scheme in FIG. 3. The linker for UTSA-76 was synthesized following the procedure described in Li, B., et al., “A Porous Metal-Organic Framework with Dynamic Pyrimidine Groups Exhibiting Record High Methane Storage Working Capacity, “J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, pp. 6207-6210 (2014) with some modifications. Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.2.5H.sub.2O (80.2 mg, 0.344 mmol) and the organic linker, 5,5′-(pyrimidine-2,5-diyl) diisophthalic acid (H.sub.4L2) (30.5 mg, 0.0742 mmol) were dissolved into mixed solvents (DMF/MeCN/H.sub.2O, 6/1/1, v/v) of 8 mL, in a screw-capped vial (20 mL). Subsequently, 50 .Math.L of 37% HCl was added to this mixture solution. The vial was capped, sonicated for approximately 5 minutes and heated in an oven at 85° C. for 24 hours. Blue block crystals were formed at the bottom of the vial, which were obtained by filtration and washed several times with DMF to form UTSA-76. Subsequently, crystals of UTSA-76 were exchanged with ethanol and immersed for three days. The supernatant liquid was replaced with fresh ethanol two times (20 mL × 2) each day. The MOF was then activated by treatment with flowing supercritical carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) for a period of 5 hours. Following supercritical activation, the crystals were further heated under dynamic vacuum (0.01 Torr) at 80° C. for 12 hours and then again at 110° C. for another 5 hours to afford purple crystalline material.

[0116] UTSA-76 exhibits a total volumetric (TV) methane uptake of 251 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.- .sup.3 and 266 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 at pressures of 65 bar and 80 bar, respectively, at 298 K (Table 1). These TV values are lower than HKUST-1 for both maximum pressures. However, UTSA-76 exhibits significantly improved usable volumetric (UV) methane capacity of 210 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.- .sup.3 (80-5 bar) in comparison to HKUST-1 (200 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3).

[0117] The higher uptake of HKUST-1 relative to UTSA-76 in the 0-5 bar region is ascribed to the presence of a higher density of CUS in HKUST-1, resulting in a larger density of methane molecules adsorbed at low pressures. This observation is consistent with previous reports that the presence of CUS can have detrimental effects on the usable capacities of MOFs.

[0118] UMCM-152 was synthesized following a reported literature procedure in Schnobrich, J. K., et al. “Linker-directed vertex desymmetrization for the production of coordination polymers with high porosity,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, pp. 13941-13948 (2010), with slight modifications. A reaction scheme for forming UMCM-152 is shown in FIG. 4B. UMCM-152 (FIG. 2B) is assembled from Cu(II) paddlewheel clusters connected through tetracarboxylated triphenyl benzene linkers and has a similar CUS density to UTSA-76. More specifically, ligand (organic linker) synthesis of the organic linker (H.sub.4L1) for UMCM-152 is shown in the reaction scheme in FIG. 4A.

[0119] The linker 5′-(4 carboxyphenyl)carboxyphenyl)-[1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl] 3,4″,5-tricarboxylic acid (H.sub.4L1) (50.05 mg, 0.1036 mmol) was added to a solution of 0.005 M HCl in DMF/dioxane/H.sub.2O (4:1:1, 10 ml). To this mixture, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.2.5H.sub.2O (96.04 mg, 0.4129 mmol) was added, and the contents were sonicated until dissolved and then heated at 85° C. for about 18 hours in a screw-capped vial (20 mL). Blue block crystals were obtained which were washed repeatedly with DMF to ensure that it is free from unreacted linker. The MOF was exchanged with dry MeOH for three consecutive days, four times wash each day. The sample was further treated with dry acetone. After removing acetone by decanting, the sample was dried under vacuum (0.03 Torr) at room temperature (4 hours), and then further heated at 100° C. for 20 hours leading to a color change from sky blue to dark purple.

[0120] The linker has a trapezoidal geometry and two types of carboxylates: one from the isophthalate group and the other is a para-benzoate unit. The structure is composed of two cages (pore diameters: approximately 16.9 and 18.6 Å). One of the cages is formed from the faces of six linker molecules and twelve Cu(II) paddlewheel clusters while the other cage is defined by the edges of twelve linkers and six Cu(II) paddlewheels. These cages stack in an alternate fashion.

[0121] UMCM-152 was activated through conventional evacuation and heating. Crystals were washed with DMF to ensure that there is no uncoordinated linker present. The crystals were then exchanged with dry methanol (MeOH) for three consecutive days, four times each day. The sample was further treated with dry acetone similarly in order to remove any methanol solvates. After removing acetone by decanting, the sample was dried under vacuum (0.03 Torr) at room temperature (4 hours), and then further heated at 100° C. for 20 hours leading to a color change from sky blue to dark purple.

[0122] DUT-23-Cu (FIG. 2C) is composed of dodecahedral mesoporous cages with pto-like topology, constructed from Cu(II) and mixed linkers. The dative ligands fully cap the copper paddlewheels blocking guest access to the metal sites; hence, DUT-23-Cu is a non-CUS MOF.

[0123] The synthesis of DUT-23-Cu is shown in FIG. 8 and was based on a published literature procedure described in Klein, N., et al., “Route to a family of robust, non-interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks with pto-like topology,” Chem.-Eur. J., 17, pp. 13007-13016 (2011), with slight modifications. Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.2.5H.sub.2O (241 mg, 1.036 mmol), bipyridine (42.20 mg, 0.2702 mmol), and 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene (109.0 mg, 0.2486 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of DMF (5 mL), EtOH (abs., 5 mL), and 50 .Math.l of trifluoroacetic acid. The mixture was sonicated for 5 min and heated at 80° C. for 20 hours in a screw-capped vial (20 mL). Light-blue clear crystals of a single phase were obtained.

[0124] Crystals of DUT-23-Cu were washed with fresh DMF two times and then exchanged with ethanol. Ethanol exchange was performed for four days, with two exchanges each day. Ethanol solvated crystals were then activated by treatment (flowing) with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) for a period of 7 hours. More specifically, ethanol solvated crystals were then activated by flowing liquid CO.sub.2 at 2 mL/min flowrate for 2 h at room temperature, subsequently by supercritical CO.sub.2 at a flow rate of 2 mL/min for 3 h at 55° C. and finally by supercritical CO.sub.2 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min for 3 h at 55° C.

[0125] FIGS. 9 and 10 show the measured BET surface areas are 3,430 m.sup.2/g (UMCM-152) and 5,300 m.sup.2/g (DUT-23-Cu), with pore volumes (at P/P.sub.0 = 0.95) of 1.45 cm.sup.3/g and 2.23 cm.sup.3/g respectively (Table 1). A total pore volume at P/P.sub.0 = 0.95 is 2.23 cm.sup.3/g. FIG. 9 shows a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm at 77 K and 1 atm pressure. The BET surface area was determined to be 3430 ± 30 m.sup.2/g (0.02<P/P.sub.0<0.05). A total pore volume at P/P.sub.0 = 0.95 is 1.45 cm.sup.3/g. FIG. 10 shows a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm at 77 K and 1 atm pressure. The BET surface area was determined to be 3430 ± 30 m.sup.2/g (0.02<P/P.sub.0<0.05). A total pore volume at P/P.sub.0 = 0.95 is 1.45 cm.sup.3/g.

[0126] Methane adsorption isotherm measurements are conducted as follows. Highpressure methane adsorption isotherms were measured on a fully automated Sievert’s-type instrument PCT-Pro from SETARAM. Activated MOF samples were loaded into a stainless-steel sample holder inside a high-purity nitrogen glove box. The sample holder was then connected to the instrument’s analysis station via VCR fittings using a 0.5 inch fritted copper gasket of 2 micrometer and evacuated at room temperature for about an hour. The sample cell manual valve should be closed off before transferring the sample holder to the sorption instrument.

[0127] The sample holder was then immersed into a recirculating Dewar, that was connected to a temperature controlled programmable isothermal bath filled with a solution of ethylene glycol-H.sub.2O and the sample temperature was maintained at 25° C. Helium was used to perform void volume measurements by the method of expansion from a known reservoir volume to the sample cell and then recording the change in the pressure, assuming negligible He adsorption. Generally, two volume calibrations are performed, one to determine the apparent volume at instrument temperature (V.sub.so) and the other to determine the apparent volume at the experimental/sample temperature (V.sub.sa). These two apparent volumes are necessary to estimate the amount of gas adsorbed and desorbed by the sample.

[0128] Excess adsorption and desorption amounts were determined by the PCT-Pro software using a simple mass balance analysis as a function of the equilibrium pressure. The excess adsorption isotherms were further corrected using background adsorption corrections, measured with empty sample holder under similar experimental conditions. Total volumetric methane capacities were then determined using the following equation: n.sub.total = n.sub.excess + V.sub.p.Math.ρ.sub.bulk (T, P) where n.sub.total represents total volumetric adsorption capacity, n.sub.excess represents the experimentally measured excess adsorption, V.sub.p indicates the total pore volume as determined (at P/P0 = 0.95) from N.sub.2 adsorption-desorption experiment at 77 K and ρ.sub.bulk indicates the bulk density of methane at specific pressures (298 K) obtained from NIST REFPROF database.

[0129] FIGS. 11 and 12 show experimental demonstration of methane adsorption isotherm of DUT-23-Cu MOF and UMCM-152 with methane uptake (cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3) versus pressure (bar) prepared in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0130] As predicted computationally in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, UMCM-152 exhibits remarkably high usable volumetric (UV) methane capacity that outperforms both HKUST-1 and UTSA-76, Table 1. The UV capacity of UMCM-152 is 207 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 (9% greater than HKUST-1 and 6% greater than UTSA-76) and 226 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 (13% > HKUST-1; 7% > UTSA-76) under 65-5 bar and 80-5 bar pressure swings, respectively, at 298 K. On the other hand, DUT-23-Cu exhibits a UV capacity of 190 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 (identical to HKUST-1 and below UTSA-76) and 216 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 (8% greater than HKUST-1 and 3% greater than UTSA-76) under a pressure swing of 65-5 bar and 80-5 bar, respectively, at 298 K. It should be noted that this performance is much higher than the Co analog: DUT-23-Co. Among all the MOFs examined, total volumetric (TV) methane uptake is still the highest in the case of HKUST-1 in both the high- and low-pressure regions. The increase in the UV capacities of UTSA-76, UMCM-152 and DUT-23-Cu relative to HKUST-1 is attributed to their comparatively low methane uptake at 5 bar (DUT-23-Cu: 21 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 < UMCM-152: 40 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.- .sup.3 < UTSA-76: 56 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3< HKUST-1: 72 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3).

[0131] From this trend it appears that the success of DUT-23-Cu is ascribed to less adsorbed CH.sub.4 at low pressure due to a lack of electrostatic interactions between CH.sub.4 molecules and CUS (CUS are absent in DUT-23-Cu), rather high uptake at high pressure. This is an important design concern, and its manifestation is more subtle than the phenomenon in low temperature hydrogen sorbents where the presence of CUS can degrade deliverable capacity dramatically. Further, the uptake at 80 bar follows the order (DUT-23-Cu: 237 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 < UMCM-152: 266 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 and UTSA-76: 266 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3 < HKUST-1: 272 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3). Thus, larger pore volume in DUT-23-Cu contributes to having relatively lower volumetric uptakes both at 5 bar (21 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) and 80 bar (237 cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) respectively. The trend can be understood in the context of previous studies on IRMOF-8-RT, another MOF with large pores, where only 50-65% of the pores are filled by adsorbed methane even at 89.4 bar. Reduction of pore size with additional linker substituents resulted in higher volumetric uptake in the derivatives of IRMOF-8-RT.

[0132] Although deliverable volumetric capacity is the primary figure of merit for an ANG system, other parameters are also important for enhanced natural gas/methane storage. For example, gravimetric capacity also influences vehicular performance because it impacts the mass of the ANG system. Earlier studies have demonstrated that gravimetric capacity depends on the pore volume and BET surface area of MOFs. For example, MOF-200, MOF-210, and Al-soc-MOF-1 with high BET surface areas of 4,530, 6,240, and 5,585 m.sup.2/g respectively, have high gravimetric uptakes but all suffer from low volumetric uptakes. On the other hand, HKUST-1 possesses high volumetric methane uptake at the expense of poor gravimetric capacity.

[0133] Therefore, a strategy to design MOFs with high UV capacity without compromising gravimetric methane uptake generally requires balancing surface area and porosity. In the context of the present application, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu all outperform HKUST-1 in terms of their respective total gravimetric (TG) methane uptakes for pressures exceeding approximately 30 bar. In fact, the TG uptake both at 65 and 80 bar follows the same order as the MOF’s respective surface areas: HKUST-1: 1836 m.sup.2/g < UTSA-76: 2700 m.sup.2/g < UMCM-152: 3430 m.sup.2/g < DUT-23-Cu: 5300 m.sup.2/g. However, at 5 bar, the gravimetric uptake follows a similar trend as does volumetric capacity, FIG. 5A (volumetric capacity) and 5B (gravimetric capacity). The usable gravimetric (UG) capacities of all three MOFs exceeds HKUST-1 under both pressure swing conditions, Table 1 and FIGS. 6A-6B.

[0134] FIGS. 13A-13F show usable various properties for coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS) and non-CUS metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). In certain variations, suitable MOFs fulfill one or more of the various performance criteria, namely gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g), pore volume (cm.sup.3/g), pore diameter (Å), volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3), single crystal density (g/cm.sup.3), and void fraction specified herein as being advantageous in FIGS. 13A-13F. More specifically, 3,229 MOFs are identified as fulfilling at least one of these properties described in the context of FIGS. 13A-13F.

[0135] FIG. 13A shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g). In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a gravimetric surface area (GSA) of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 2,000 m.sup.2/g, optionally greater than or equal to about 2,500 m.sup.2/g, optionally greater than or equal to about 3,000 m.sup.2/g, and in certain variations, optionally greater than or equal to about 4,000 m.sup.2/g. In FIG. 13A, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 997 MOFs are identified as having a GSA of greater than or equal to about 2,000 m.sup.2/g, which are listed in Appendix A, incorporated herein by reference.

[0136] FIG. 13B shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus pore volume (cm.sup.3/g). In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a pore volume (PV) of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 1 cm.sup.3/g to less than or equal to about 2.2 cm.sup.3/g. In FIG. 13B, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 354 MOFs are identified as having a PV of greater than or equal to about 1 cm.sup.3/g to less than or equal to about 2.2 cm.sup.3/g, which are listed in Appendix B, incorporated herein by reference.

[0137] FIG. 13C shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus pore diameter. In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a pore diameter of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 7 Angstrom (Å) to less than or equal to about 20 Angstrom. In FIG. 13C, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 2,167 MOFs are identified as having a pore diameter of greater than or equal to about 7 Angstrom (Å) to less than or equal to about 20 Angstrom, which are listed in Appendix C, incorporated herein by reference.

[0138] FIG. 13D shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3). In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a volumetric surface area of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 1,800 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 2,700 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3. In FIG. 13D, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 1,369 MOFs are identified as having a volumetric surface area of greater than or equal to about 1,800 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 2,700 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3, which are listed in Appendix D, incorporated herein by reference.

[0139] FIG. 13E shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus single crystal density (g/cm.sup.3). In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a single crystal density of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 0.4 g/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 1 g/cm.sup.3. In FIG. 13E, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 1,367 MOFs are identified as having a single crystal density of greater than or equal to about 0.4 g/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 1 g/cm.sup.3, which are listed in Appendix E, incorporated herein by reference.

[0140] FIG. 13F shows usable volumetric methane capacity (cm.sup.3 (STP) cm.sup.-3) of the MOFs versus void fraction. In accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure, a void fraction of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 0.7 to less than or equal to about 0.85. In FIG. 13F, HKUST-1, UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs are all highlighted by the arrows. In total, 1,367 MOFs are identified as having a void fraction of greater than or equal to about 0.7 to less than or equal to about 0.85, which are listed in Appendix F, incorporated herein by reference.

[0141] In various aspects, each of UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu MOFs fulfill the various performance criteria, namely gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g), pore volume (cm.sup.3/g), pore diameter (Å), volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3), single crystal density (g/cm.sup.3), and void fraction specified as being advantageous in FIGS. 13A-13F. In certain variations, a suitable MOF for storing a gas comprising methane may have all of the following attributes: a usable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K, a gravimetric surface area of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 2,000 m.sup.2/g, optionally greater than or equal to about 2,800 m.sup.2/g, a pore volume of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 1 cm.sup.3/g to less than or equal to about 2.2 cm.sup.3/g, a pore diameter of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 7 Angstrom (Å) to less than or equal to about 20 Angstrom, a volumetric surface area of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 1,800 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 2,700 m.sup.2/cm.sup.3, a single crystal density of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 0.4 g/cm.sup.3 to less than or equal to about 1 g/cm.sup.3, and a void fraction of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 0.7 to less than or equal to about 0.85. In total, 151 MOFs fulfill all the criteria set forth in FIGS. 13A-13F, as reflected in Table 7 below. By way of non-limiting example, this includes MOFs such as UTSA-76, UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu.

TABLE-US-00007 Source Single crystal density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) Usable gravimetric capacity under pressure swing between 65 and 5 bar at 298 K (g/g) Usable volumetric capacity under pressure swing between 65 and 5 bar at 298 K (cm.sup.3 STP/cm.sup.3) Usable gravimetric capacity under pressure swing between 80 and 5 bar at 298 K (g/g) Usable volumetric capacity under pressure swing between 80 and 5 bar at 298 K (cm.sup.3 STP/cm.sup.3) ARAHIM01 CoRE (2019) 0.70 3269 2278 0.76 1.09 11.1 6.1 0.177 172 0.188 183 QAMLEY CoRE (2019) 0.70 3269 2278 0.76 1.09 11.1 6.1 0.177 172 0.188 183 ALEQIT CoRE (2019) 0.55 3732 2069 0.79 1.43 11.2 9.5 0.240 186 0.259 200 cg500192d_si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.55 3732 2069 0.79 1.43 11.2 9.5 0.240 186 0.259 200 ASUKEE CoRE (2019) 0.68 3184 2158 0.75 1.11 11.3 7.6 0.158 150 0.168 159 ja406030p_si_005_manual CoRE (2019) 0.68 3184 2158 0.75 1.11 11.3 7.6 0.158 150 0.168 159 AGUWUV CoRE (2019) 0.51 4131 2105 0.81 1.58 11.4 9.0 0.197 140 0.220 157 ja512311a_si_007 CoRE (2019) 0.51 4131 2105 0.81 1.58 11.4 9.0 0.197 140 0.220 157 ATIBOU02 CoRE (2019) 0.70 3197 2222 0.75 1.08 11.4 8.4 0.163 158 0.173 168 ja406844r_si_002_clean CoRE (2019) 0.70 3197 2222 0.75 1.08 11.4 8.4 0.163 158 0.173 168 AFIXES CoRE (2019) 0.48 4457 2124 0.82 1.72 11.4 9.6 0.317 211 0.338 225 AJAYIT CoRE (2019) 0.61 3634 2205 0.80 1.32 11.5 8.6 0.240 203 0.256 217 FATQID CoRE (2019) 0.61 3634 2205 0.80 1.32 11.5 8.6 0.240 203 0.256 217 AQAJEI CoRE (2019) 0.61 3654 2225 0.77 1.26 11.6 9.8 0.224 191 0.238 202 NUBPIL CoRE (2019) 0.61 3654 2225 0.77 1.26 11.6 9.8 0.224 191 0.238 202 AQUCUM CoRE (2019) 0.62 3560 2219 0.76 1.22 11.9 7.2 0.211 183 0.222 194 AHAMAY CoRE (2019) 0.49 4492 2208 0.81 1.64 11.9 9.0 0.242 166 0.264 181 ja512311a_si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.49 4492 2208 0.81 1.64 11.9 9.0 0.242 166 0.264 181 ARAFEF CoRE (2019) 0.62 3725 2307 0.76 1.23 11.9 9.1 0.190 164 0.204 177 ja411887c_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.62 3725 2307 0.76 1.23 11.9 9.1 0.190 164 0.204 177 AMUXAI CoRE (2019) 0.52 4206 2179 0.78 1.50 11.9 10.7 0.255 185 0.272 196 cm303749m_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.52 4206 2179 0.78 1.50 11.9 10.7 0.255 185 0.272 196 ALULID CoRE (2019) 0.47 4464 2101 0.79 1.67 12.0 10.5 0.244 160 0.266 175 VEWKUF CoRE (2019) 0.47 4464 2101 0.79 1.67 12.0 10.5 0.244 160 0.266 175 APAYUN CoRE (2019) 0.62 3698 2287 0.77 1.25 12.1 6.7 0.224 193 0.236 204 LUYHAP CoRE (2019) 0.62 3698 2287 0.77 1.25 12.1 6.7 0.224 193 0.236 204 ALANAD CoRE (2019) 0.52 4263 2227 0.79 1.52 12.3 9.7 0.264 193 0.281 205 ANUGOG CoRE (2019) 0.62 3340 2079 0.78 1.25 12.5 9.0 0.207 180 0.217 189 MATXAJ CoRE (2019) 0.62 3340 2079 0.78 1.25 12.5 9.0 0.207 180 0.217 189 AMIMAL CoRE (2019) 0.53 3730 1990 0.78 1.46 12.6 10.1 0.225 167 0.243 181 FAYQED CoRE (2019) 0.53 3730 1990 0.78 1.46 12.6 10.1 0.225 167 0.243 181 ATAYAX CoRE (2019) 0.68 3326 2254 0.75 1.11 12.6 6.5 0.175 166 0.184 174 EPISOM CoRE (2019) 0.68 3326 2254 0.75 1.11 12.6 6.5 0.175 166 0.184 174 AQODOA CoRE (2019) 0.69 3237 2218 0.76 1.12 12.6 7.0 0.191 183 0.201 192 FIFGIM CoRE (2019) 0.69 3237 2218 0.76 1.12 12.6 7.0 0.191 183 0.201 192 ALUJIB CoRE (2019) 0.70 3225 2272 0.79 1.12 12.7 7.9 0.190 187 0.202 198 j.inoche.2015.03.054_CIFs CoRE (2019) 0.70 3225 2272 0.79 1.12 12.7 7.9 0.190 187 0.202 198 APETAS CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.77 1.30 12.9 9.9 0.215 178 0.229 189 HUFKUQ CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.77 1.30 12.9 9.9 0.215 178 0.229 189 AGAYIQ CoRE (2019) 0.53 3857 2030 0.81 1.54 13.0 10.5 0.248 182 0.269 198 OLOGEC CoRE (2019) 0.53 3857 2030 0.81 1.54 13.0 10.5 0.248 182 0.269 198 APEBED CoRE (2019) 0.54 3959 2135 0.77 1.43 13.1 11.6 0.226 170 0.247 186 FEFDEB_ manual CoRE (2019) 0.54 3959 2135 0.77 1.43 13.1 11.6 0.226 170 0.247 186 AFUPEX CoRE (2019) 0.45 4658 2109 0.81 1.79 13.2 9.8 0.339 214 0.359 227 ASEJOZ01 CoRE (2019) 0.69 3286 2270 0.75 1.09 13.2 11.6 0.184 178 0.197 190 ic502643m_si_007 CoRE (2019) 0.69 3286 2270 0.75 1.09 13.2 11.6 0.184 178 0.197 190 ASANAL CoRE (2019) 0.66 3438 2269 0.75 1.14 13.2 7.5 0.191 176 0.206 190 KULMEK CoRE (2019) 0.66 3438 2269 0.75 1.14 13.2 7.5 0.191 176 0.206 190 AMAFOK CoRE (2019) 0.54 3625 1971 0.78 1.44 13.2 12.5 0.240 182 0.259 196 FUNCEX CoRE (2019) 0.54 3625 1971 0.78 1.44 13.2 12.5 0.240 182 0.259 196 ALULEZ CoRE (2019) 0.55 3985 2174 0.79 1.44 13.3 7.6 0.252 192 0.270 206 CAJQIP CoRE (2019) 0.55 3985 2174 0.79 1.44 13.3 7.6 0.252 192 0.270 206 APACAX CoRE (2019) 0.57 3358 1930 0.77 1.35 13.3 11.7 0.223 179 0.240 193 jacs.6b09113_ja6b09113_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.57 3358 1930 0.77 1.35 13.3 11.7 0.223 179 0.240 193 AHEBAS CoRE (2019) 0.62 3622 2232 0.81 1.31 13.4 7.2 0.207 178 0.227 196 MEJMOE CoRE (2019) 0.62 3622 2232 0.81 1.31 13.4 7.2 0.207 178 0.227 196 ALURAB CoRE (2019) 0.48 4197 2019 0.79 1.63 13.6 8.6 0.278 187 0.303 204 FAGQAI CoRE (2019) 0.48 4197 2019 0.79 1.63 13.6 8.6 0.278 187 0.303 204 ALEJIM CoRE (2019) 0.60 3755 2269 0.79 1.31 13.6 13.3 0.220 186 0.232 196 ic502643m_si_011 CoRE (2019) 0.60 3755 2269 0.79 1.31 13.6 13.3 0.220 186 0.232 196 AMALND CoRE (2019) 0.56 3777 2129 0.78 1.39 13.8 8.0 0.243 191 0.258 203 cg301577a_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.56 3777 2129 0.78 1.39 13.8 8.0 0.243 191 0.258 203 AFOVAT CoRE (2019) 0.54 3872 2106 0.82 1.50 13.8 9.9 0.281 214 0.300 228 ALAMUW CoRE (2019) 0.57 4061 2306 0.79 1.40 13.9 6.8 0.258 205 0.273 217 APAYIB CoRE (2019) 0.62 3432 2114 0.77 1.25 13.9 9.2 0.217 187 0.233 200 ASIQEA CoRE (2019) 0.63 3345 2119 0.75 1.19 13.9 7.4 0.194 172 0.206 182 NIGDEO CoRE (2019) 0.63 3345 2119 0.75 1.19 13.9 7.4 0.194 172 0.206 182 AQEQIW CoRE (2019) 0.62 3550 2210 0.77 1.23 14.0 7.4 0.201 175 0.212 184 NIGDIS CoRE (2019) 0.62 3550 2210 0.77 1.23 14.0 7.4 0.201 175 0.212 184 APEBEE CoRE (2019) 0.65 3222 2097 0.77 1.18 14.1 9.5 0.193 175 0.205 186 OKABAE CoRE (2019) 0.65 3222 2097 0.77 1.18 14.1 9.5 0.193 175 0.205 186 ARUDAU CoRE (2019) 0.67 3453 2302 0.76 1.14 14.2 6.5 0.184 171 0.194 180 FAMQAO CoRE (2019) 0.67 3453 2302 0.76 1.14 14.2 6.5 0.184 171 0.194 180 ADODII CoRE (2019) 0.43 4497 1932 0.82 1.91 14.5 11.9 0.242 145 0.277 166 AGONEQ CoRE (2019) 0.63 3422 2151 0.81 1.29 14.7 8.1 0.189 166 0.211 185 AGARUW CoRE (2019) 0.61 3637 2232 0.81 1.32 14.8 7.9 0.215 184 0.236 202 PEVQOY_h CoRE (2019) 0.61 3637 2232 0.81 1.32 14.8 7.9 0.215 184 0.236 202 AKEDIF CoRE (2019) 0.61 3715 2263 0.80 1.31 14.9 7.9 0.210 178 0.228 194 ic2017598_si_001_h CoRE (2019) 0.61 3715 2263 0.80 1.31 14.9 7.9 0.210 178 0.228 194 AHEQAH CoRE (2019) 0.61 3681 2230 0.81 1.33 14.9 7.8 0.211 178 0.228 193 PEVQIS CoRE (2019) 0.61 3681 2230 0.81 1.33 14.9 7.8 0.211 178 0.228 193 AJINOY CoRE (2019) 0.59 3708 2205 0.80 1.35 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 0.241 200 VUSKAW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3708 2205 0.80 1.35 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 0.241 200 AJAMEF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3687 2193 0.80 1.35 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 0.243 202 VUSKEA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3687 2193 0.80 1.35 15.0 8.0 0.223 185 0.243 202 AGESIP CoRE (2019) 0.60 3703 2203 0.81 1.36 15.0 8.0 0.225 187 0.246 204 ja074366osi20070816_031204 CoRE (2019) 0.60 3703 2203 0.81 1.36 15.0 8.0 0.225 187 0.246 204 AGIREP CoRE (2019) 0.59 3751 2226 0.81 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.222 184 0.241 200 EDUSIF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3751 2226 0.81 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.222 184 0.241 200 AGONAM CoRE (2019) 0.57 3880 2221 0.81 1.41 15.1 7.9 0.213 170 0.232 186 NEXVET CoRE (2019) 0.57 3880 2221 0.81 1.41 15.1 7.9 0.213 170 0.232 186 AHOKIR CoRE (2019) 0.59 3769 2230 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 182 0.241 199 LAWGEW CoRE (2019) 0.59 3769 2230 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 182 0.241 199 AFUKIX CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.81 1.37 15.1 7.9 0.215 178 0.231 191 VAZTUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3797 2247 0.81 1.37 15.1 7.9 0.215 178 0.231 191 AHUFIU CoRE (2019) 0.59 3776 2230 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.222 183 0.240 198 LAWGIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3776 2230 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.222 183 0.240 198 AJOXAA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.213 175 0.233 192 VAZTOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.213 175 0.233 192 AHOBEG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3785 2231 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 0.242 199 LAWGOG CoRE (2019) 0.59 3785 2231 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 0.242 199 AHUTIH CoRE (2019) 0.58 3799 2219 0.80 1.37 15.1 7.9 0.222 181 0.242 197 HIFTOG01 CoRE (2019) 0.58 3799 2219 0.80 1.37 15.1 7.9 0.222 181 0.242 197 AFOYOK CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.81 1.38 15.1 7.9 0.219 181 0.238 196 LAWGAS CoRE (2019) 0.59 3787 2234 0.81 1.38 15.1 7.9 0.219 181 0.238 196 AGABIU CoRE (2019) 0.59 3806 2245 0.81 1.38 15.1 7.9 0.210 173 0.231 190 PEDRIA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3806 2245 0.81 1.38 15.1 7.9 0.210 173 0.231 190 AHOJUC CoRE (2019) 0.59 3790 2232 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 0.240 197 LAWGUM CoRE (2019) 0.59 3790 2232 0.80 1.36 15.1 7.9 0.220 181 0.240 197 AFOYIE CoRE (2019) 0.59 3779 2229 0.81 1.38 15.1 8.0 0.219 180 0.239 197 LAWFUL CoRE (2019) 0.59 3779 2229 0.81 1.38 15.1 8.0 0.219 180 0.239 197 AFOYEB CoRE (2019) 0.59 3788 2233 0.81 1.38 15.1 8.0 0.220 181 0.240 198 LAWFOF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3788 2233 0.81 1.38 15.1 8.0 0.220 181 0.240 198 AMIKOX CoRE (2019) 0.55 3683 2040 0.78 1.41 15.4 7.5 0.224 173 0.244 189 HAFTOZ CoRE (2019) 0.55 3683 2040 0.78 1.41 15.4 7.5 0.224 173 0.244 189 AHOKOX CoRE (2019) 0.46 4299 1977 0.80 1.75 15.5 10.5 0.243 156 0.272 175 KARNAU CoRE (2019) 0.46 4299 1977 0.80 1.75 15.5 10.5 0.243 156 0.272 175 ALULAV CoRE (2019) 0.56 3942 2205 0.79 1.41 15.6 9.0 0.258 201 0.270 211 ANENEN CoRE (2019) 0.54 3858 2079 0.78 1.44 15.7 6.1 0.251 189 0.266 200 COCMOY CoRE (2019) 0.54 3858 2079 0.78 1.44 15.7 6.1 0.251 189 0.266 200 ADODOO CoRE (2019) 0.47 4152 1931 0.82 1.77 15.8 12.7 0.290 188 0.315 205 FAHPOV CoRE (2019) 0.47 4152 1931 0.82 1.77 15.8 12.7 0.290 188 0.315 205 AGIMOU CoRE (2019) 0.46 4230 1949 0.81 1.76 15.9 10.4 0.319 206 0.343 221 POHWIU CoRE (2019) 0.46 4230 1949 0.81 1.76 15.9 10.4 0.319 206 0.343 221 AQETIA CoRE (2019) 0.63 3636 2275 0.77 1.23 17.2 6.7 0.212 185 0.225 196 AFUKET CoRE (2019) 0.56 3595 2002 0.81 1.46 17.3 8.1 0.209 163 0.231 180 TEQPEM_SL CoRE (2019) 0.56 3595 2002 0.81 1.46 17.3 8.1 0.209 163 0.231 180 AQALOU CoRE (2019) 0.65 3380 2199 0.77 1.18 17.5 7.7 0.188 171 0.201 182 ja5109535_si_002 CoRE (2019) 0.65 3380 2199 0.77 1.18 17.5 7.7 0.188 171 0.201 182 AGUVOO _charged CoRE (2019) 0.49 4145 2044 0.81 1.63 17.5 9.2 0.218 150 0.245 169 ja507947d_si_001 CoRE (2019) 0.49 4145 2044 0.81 1.63 17.5 9.2 0.218 150 0.245 169 AKOBAF CoRE (2019) 0.59 3830 2255 0.80 1.35 17.8 7.5 0.239 196 0.254 209 PEWLUA CoRE (2019) 0.59 3830 2255 0.80 1.35 17.8 7.5 0.239 196 0.254 209 ALURIJ CoRE (2019) 0.63 3520 2223 0.78 1.24 18.1 6.7 0.187 165 0.197 174 AMILOY CoRE (2019) 0.59 3730 2209 0.78 1.32 18.2 7.1 0.218 180 0.230 191 AQMAND CoRE (2019) 0.63 3491 2197 0.77 1.22 18.2 6.6 0.206 181 0.218 192 AFOTUL CoRE (2019) 0.54 3650 1958 0.82 1.52 18.5 9.4 0.250 188 0.273 204 LIKDOA CoRE (2019) 0.54 3650 1958 0.82 1.52 18.5 9.4 0.250 188 0.273 204 AHOKAJ CoRE (2019) 0.47 4164 1955 0.80 1.71 18.6 7.9 0.249 163 0.276 181 MUBZUG CoRE (2019) 0.47 4164 1955 0.80 1.71 18.6 7.9 0.249 163 0.276 181 AFOYAW CoRE (2019) 0.44 4507 1990 0.81 1.84 18.7 7.1 0.255 157 0.286 176 MUBZOA CoRE (2019) 0.44 4507 1990 0.81 1.84 18.7 7.1 0.255 157 0.286 176 AQUDAT CoRE (2019) 0.61 3636 2221 0.76 1.25 18.8 6.4 0.216 184 0.229 195 ja110042b_si_003 CoRE (2019) 0.61 3636 2221 0.76 1.25 18.8 6.4 0.216 184 0.229 195 ALOLES_ion_b CoRE (2019) 0.56 3858 2169 0.79 1.41 18.9 6.6 0.234 184 0.250 197 MUDTAH CoRE (2019) 0.56 3858 2169 0.79 1.41 18.9 6.6 0.234 184 0.250 197 ALUKIC CoRE (2019) 0.56 3853 2155 0.79 1.41 19.1 6.6 0.242 189 0.258 202 MUDTEL CoRE (2019) 0.56 3853 2155 0.79 1.41 19.1 6.6 0.242 189 0.258 202 ALALUU CoRE (2019) 0.51 3905 2008 0.80 1.55 20.2 6.4 0.249 179 0.271 195 NEYVEU CoRE (2019) 0.51 3905 2008 0.80 1.55 20.2 6.4 0.249 179 0.271 195 ADOBOL_ charged CoRE (2019) 0.41 4636 1916 0.82 1.99 20.3 7.9 0.303 175 0.334 193

[0142] In certain other variations, a suitable MOF for storing a gas comprising methane may have all of the following attributes: a usable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 216 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K, a gravimetric surface area of the MOF is greater than or equal to about 2,800 m.sup.2/g, and a pore volume of greater than or equal to about 1.1 cm.sup.3/g to less than or equal to about 2.2 cm.sup.3/g. By way of non-limiting example, such MOFs include UMCM-152, and DUT-23-Cu.

[0143] In accordance with various aspects of the present disclosure, MOFs for methane sorption were identified computationally. Based on these predictions, as noted above, three MOFs, UTSA-76, UMCM-152 and DUT-23-Cu, were synthesized and their measured capacities were observed to surpass the usable capacity of HKUST-1, the benchmark for methane storage, under pressure swing conditions. Specifically, UMCM-152 is demonstrated to outperform the benchmark MOFs, HKUST-1 and UTSA-76, both on a volumetric and gravimetric basis. Although high uptake at elevated pressure contributes to this performance, there is an additional requirement that the density of high affinity sites (coordinatively unsaturated metal centers) is low enough to allow relatively complete release of stored gas at low pressure. The utility of mining existing MOF databases for promising materials is demonstrated and provides an efficient discovery paradigm for measurements, such as high pressure methane storage, that are challenging experimentally.

[0144] In one variation, the natural gas storage material comprises a porous metal-organic framework material that is UMCM-152. In certain variations, the usable methane storage capacity is greater than or equal to about 226 cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3.

TABLE-US-00008 Name Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) UMCM-152 0.57 4061 2306 0.79 1.4 13.9 6.8

[0145] In another variation, the natural gas storage material comprises a porous metal-organic framework material that is DUT-23-Cu. In certain variations, the usable methane storage capacity is greater than or equal to about 216 cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3.

TABLE-US-00009 Name Density (g/cm.sup.3) Gravimetric surface area (m.sup.2/g) Volumetric surface area (m.sup.2/cm.sup.3) Void fraction Pore volume (cm.sup.3/g) Largest cavity diameter (Å) Pore limiting diameter (Å) DUT-23-Cu 0.41 4636 1916 0.82 2.0 20.3 7.9

[0146] In yet other variations, a natural gas storage material may include combinations of different MOFs. For example, in one variation, a natural gas storage material may comprise a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane selected from the group consisting of: UMCM-152, DUT-23-Cu, and combinations thereof.

[0147] FIG. 14 shows a simplified diagram of a natural gas storage system 50 comprising a storage vessel 60 (e.g., a tank) having at least one port (e.g. inlet and outlet) 62 for fluid communication. While not shown, the storage vessel 60 may be stationary or mobile, for example, incorporated into a vehicle. The storage vessel 60 may have more than one port 62 depending on the storage vessel 60 design. The storage vessel 60 defines an interior storage cavity 64 in which a porous metal-organic framework material 70 is disposed. In certain aspects, the porous metal-organic framework material 70 has one or more sites for reversibly storing methane and having a useable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3 (STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. The porous metal-organic framework material 70 is capable of reversibly storing a gas comprising methane (e.g., natural gas) via adsorption and desorption within the storage cavity 64 of the storage vessel 60.

[0148] As shown in FIG. 14, the natural gas storage system 50 also includes a conduit 80 for delivering gas to the port 62 of the storage vessel 60, which may have a compressor or pump 82 for pressurizing the gas prior to entering the storage vessel 60. Notably, the compressor or pump 82 and portions of the conduit 80 may be associated with a natural gas supply station (not shown). The pump 82 may thus intermittently be used to supply pressurized gas via conduit 80 to refuel the storage vessel 60. A three-way valve 84 may be disposed in the conduit 80 so that desorbed gas released from the porous metal-organic framework material 70 in the storage vessel 60 can be delivered in a fuel delivery conduit 86.

[0149] In certain other aspects, the present disclosure contemplates methods of reversibly storing a gas comprising methane. Any of the MOFs described above are suitable for use with such methods. In certain variations, the method may comprise contacting the gas comprising methane with a porous metal-organic framework (MOF) material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane and having a usable methane storage capacity of greater than or equal to about 208 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K. The contacting may occur where a first pressure (e.g., surrounding the MOF material and/or a pressure of the incoming gas to be adsorbed) is greater than or equal to about 65 bar for adsorbing methane molecules on the one or more sites of the MOF material. In certain variations, the contacting may occur where the first pressure of greater than or equal to about 80 bar. The methods may further comprise releasing the gas comprising methane by desorption from the porous metal-organic framework material by reducing to a second pressure of less than or equal to about 5 bar.

[0150] In other variations, the present disclosure contemplates methods of reversibly storing a gas comprising methane. The method comprises contacting the gas comprising methane at a first pressure with a porous metal-organic framework material having one or more sites for reversibly storing methane. The porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene- 1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof.

[0151] The contacting may occur where a first pressure is greater than or equal to about 65 bar for adsorbing methane molecules on the one or more sites. In variations, the contacting may occur at the first pressure of greater than or equal to about 80 bar. The method may further comprise releasing the gas comprising methane by desorption from the porous metal-organic framework material by reducing to a second pressure of less than or equal to about 5 bar.

[0152] In certain variations, the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), and combinations thereof. In such a variation, the MOF has a usable methane storage capacity for methane/natural gas storage of greater than or equal to about 190 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 65 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

[0153] In other variations, the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), catena-[(.Math.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), bis(m2-N′-(3-hydroxy-2-oxybenzylidene)-2-hydroxybenzohydrazide)-tetrakis(pyridine)-di-manganese dinitrate methanol solvate (cg500192d_si_003 or porph@MOM-13), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate trihydrate (VUSKAW or MOF-5), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), catena-(tris(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-(m4-oxo)-tetra-zinc heptakis(N,N-diethylformamide) trihydrate clathrate) (EDUSIF or MOF-5), and combinations thereof. In such a variation, the MOF has a usable methane storage capacity for methane/natural gas storage of greater than or equal to about 200 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

[0154] In a further variation, the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT-23-Cu), catena-[(.Math..sub.4-Oxo)-tris(.Math..sub.4-thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc] (VEBHUG or IRMOF-20), catena-[bis(dimethylammonium) (.Math.-triphenylene-2,3,6,7,10,11-hexolato)-vanadium dihydrate] (FUYCIN or V-CAT-5), catena-[(m-oxido)-tris(m-benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-tetra-zinc(ii)] (ja074366osi20070816_031204 or IRMOF-3), catena-[hexakis(dimethylammonium) disulfate tris(m2-oxalato)-di-zinc] (XIYYEL), catena-(hexakis(m4-Benzene-1,4-dicarboxylato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc solvate) (VUSKEA or MOF-5), catena-(tris(m7-2,2′-(Adipoylbis(azanediyl))diterephthalato)-bis(m4-oxo)-octa-zinc chloroform dimethylformamide solvate) (PEVQOY or IRMOF-3-AM4XL), and combinations thereof. In such a variation, the MOF has a usable methane storage capacity for methane/natural gas storage of greater than or equal to about 202 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

[0155] In yet another variations, the porous metal-organic framework material is selected from the group consisting of: catena-((.Math.8-5-(3,5-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato)-diaqua-di-copper] (UMCM-152), catena-(tetrakis(.Math.6-benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate)-tris(.Math.2-4,4′-bipyridine)-hexa-copper) (DUT 23 Cu), and combinations thereof. In such a variation, the MOF has a usable methane storage capacity for methane/natural gas storage of greater than or equal to about 216 cm.sup.3(STP)/cm.sup.3 under pressure swing conditions of 80 bar adsorption to 5 bar desorption at 298 K.

[0156] The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.