Nonlinear Optical Material

Abstract

A device comprising a nonlinear optical (NLO) material according to the formula XLi.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. A device comprising a nonlinear optical material (NLO) according to the formula KSrCO.sub.3F, wherein the NLO comprises at least one single crystal. A nonlinear optical material selected from the group consisting of KSrCO.sub.3F Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F and K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

Claims

1. A device comprising a nonlinear optical (NLO) material according to the formula XLi.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

2. The device of claim 1, wherein X comprises potassium (K) and strontium (Sr).

3. The device of claim 1, wherein X comprises K.sub.3Sr.sub.3.

4. The device of claim 1, wherein X comprises rubidium (Rb) and barium (Ba).

5. The device of claim 1, wherein X comprises Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3.

6. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits a walkoff of from about 200 mrad to about 1 mrad.

7. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO forms single crystals with a minimum diameter of from about 2 mm to about 20 mm in at least two directions.

8. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits a second harmonic generation coefficient of greater than 0.39 pm/V.

9. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits a band gap of greater than 6.2 eV.

10. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits an adsorption edge of less than 200 nm.

11. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits a laser damage threshold of greater than 5.0 GW/cm.sup.2.

12. The device of claim 1, wherein the NLO exhibits a bifringence at 1064 nm ranging from about 0.05 to about 0.09.

13. A device comprising a nonlinear optical material (NLO) according to the formula KSrCO.sub.3F, wherein the NLO comprises at least one single crystal.

14. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits a walkoff of from about 1 mrad to about 200 mrad.

15. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO forms single crystals with a minimum diameter of from about 2 mm to about 20 mm in at least two directions.

16. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits a second harmonic generation coefficient of greater than 0.39 pm/V.

17. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits a band gap of greater than 6.2 eV.

18. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits an adsorption edge of less than 200 nm.

19. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits a laser damage threshold of greater than 5.0 GW/cm.sup.2.

20. The device of claim 13, wherein the NLO exhibits a bifringence at 1064 nm ranging from about 0.05 to about 0.09.

21. A nonlinear optical material selected from the group consisting of KSrCO.sub.3F Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F and K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

22. A device comprising the nonlinear optical material of claim 21.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] FIG. 1 is a powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) graph of polycrystalline K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0011] FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of how the the AlO.sub.4 and LiO.sub.3F tetrahedra connect with isolated BO.sub.3 triangles to create [Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F].sub.∞ double-layers according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0012] FIG. 3 is as schematic illustration of the ab-plane of an NLO material fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0013] FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs of the powder SHG results for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to aspects of the present disclosure.

[0014] FIG. 5 is an indexed single crystal of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to aspects of the present disclosure.

[0015] FIG. 6 is a graph of the refractive-index for a wafer of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F that was manufactured according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0016] FIG. 7 is a graph of the calculated refractive index dispersion curves, based on the Sellmeier equations, for the samples of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F manufactured according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0017] FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of the structural evolution from KBBF to Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

[0018] FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate a thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA) curve, a recrystallization curve, and a photo of a crystal of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to aspects of the present disclosure.

[0019] FIGS. 10A-10D are schematics of the building blocks and as-fabricated structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0020] FIGS. 11A-11D illustrate linear and non-linear optical properties of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0021] FIG. 12 illustrates a graph of the IR spectrum of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0022] FIG. 13 is a graph of the IR Spectrum of Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0023] FIG. 14 is a graph of the TG/DTA data for Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0024] FIGS. 15A and 15B are before (15A) and after (15B) images of a high quality Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure that was placed in water for a week with no decomposition or degradation observed.

[0025] FIG. 16 is a graph of transmission and wavelength for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] The following discussion is directed to various exemplary aspects. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the examples disclosed herein have broad application, and that the discussion of any aspect is meant only to be exemplary of that aspect, and not intended to suggest that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that aspect.

[0027] The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features and components herein may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in interest of clarity and conciseness.

[0028] In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .”

[0029] A “laser damage threshold” is a term used herein to define a peak fluency of laser irradiation at which irreversible changes in a material's structure may occur. This laser damage threshold may be defined as the highest quantity of laser radiation that a material may absorb before there are changes to the material's optical properties. This may also be defined by the ISO standards 21254-1, 2, 3, and 4 definitions as the highest quantity of laser radiation incident upon the optical component for which the extrapolated probability of damage is zero where the quantity of laser radiation may be expressed as power density, linear power density or energy density.

[0030] “Anisotropy” is the term used to define properties/characteristics of material that may vary depending upon the direction in which the properties/characteristics are observed/measured.

[0031] “Birefringence,” which may be referred to as “double refraction,” is an optical material property where a light passing through a crystal is split into two unequal wavelengths, which then each pass through the crystal at different respective speeds. Birefringence is exhibited in optically anisotropic crystals.

[0032] “Non-centrosymmetric” is a term used to describe the symmetry (or lack thereof) of certain crystal structures. Non-centrosymmetric materials are materials where point groups lack an inversion center, in contrast to centrosymmetric structures and materials which comprise a unit cell (e.g., face-centered-cubic, “fcc”) that has a center of symmetry at, for example, (0,0,0). In this example, the inversion centers may be observed at atom sites such as the atom at (0, 0, ½), which would invert to the atom at (0, 0, −½), and the atom at (½, ½, 0) inverts to (−½, −½, 0). While an fcc structure comprises an inversion center at every atom, a structure may be characterized as centrosymmetric if it comprises at least one inversion center and may be characterized as non-centrosymmetric if it does not comprise any inversion centers.

[0033] “Band gap” is the characteristic of a material, such as an optical material, that is associated with the minimum energy needed to move an electron from a bound state (valence band) into a free state (conduction band). Varying energy band structures in semiconductors are associated with the electrical (including thermoelectric) properties exhibited by these semiconductors.

[0034] Disclosed herein are NLO materials and methods of making and using same. NLO materials are of intense interest owing to their ability to control and manipulate light for the generation of coherent radiation at a variety of difficult to access wavelengths. They have efficiently expanded the spectral ranges of solid state lasers from ultraviolet (UV) to infrared (IR). Accessing directly the deep-ultraviolet (DUV) region (150 nm-400 nm), however, is especially challenging, yet desirable for a number of advanced optical technologies, including photolithography for microelectronics and attosecond pulse generation for electron dynamic studies in matter.

[0035] In an aspect the NLOs of the present disclosure exhibit at least one of the following desirable characteristics: i) a noncentrosymmetric (NCS) crystal structure; ii) large SHG coefficient (d.sub.ij>0.39 pm/V); iii) wide band gap (E.sub.g>6.2 eV), i.e. an absorption edge <200 nm; iv) moderate birefringence at 1064 nm (d.sub.n˜0.05-0.09); v) chemical stability with a large laser damage threshold (LDT >5.0 gigawatts per cm.sup.2 or GW/cm.sup.2), and vi) easy growth of large—centimeter size—high quality single crystals.

[0036] In yet another aspect, NLOs of the present disclosure exhibit at least two, alternatively at least three or alternatively at least four of the following desirable characteristics: i) a noncentrosymmetric (NCS) crystal structure; ii) large SHG coefficient (d.sub.ij>0.39 pm/V); iii) wide band gap (E.sub.g>6.2 eV), i.e. an absorption edge <200 nm; iv) moderate birefringence at 1064 nm (d.sub.n˜0.05-0.09); v) chemical stability with a large laser damage threshold (LDT >5.0 GW/cm.sup.2), and vi) easy growth of large—centimeter size—high quality single crystals.

[0037] In some aspects, the NLO materials of the present disclosure are used in UV and/or DUV applications and exhibit the following characteristics: i) a noncentrosymmetric (NCS) crystal structure; ii) large SHG coefficient (d.sub.ij>0.39 pm/V); iii) wide band gap (E.sub.g>6.2 V), i.e. an absorption edge <200 nm; iv) moderate birefringence at 1064 nm (d.sub.n˜0.05-0.09); v) chemical stability with a large laser damage threshold (LDT >5.0 GW/cm.sup.2), and vi) easy growth of large—centimeter size—high quality single crystals.

[0038] In an aspect, the systems and methods disclosed herein produce NLO materials that have a small walk-off effect and are not hygroscopic. Herein the term “walk-off effect” refers to a material having too large a birefringence (Δn>0.11) resulting in a reduction in the intensity of the second-harmonic beam and the birefringence may be determined through refractive index measurements. An NLO material of the type disclosed herein may be characterized by a walk-off of from about 1 mrad to about 200 mrad, alternatively from about 10 mrad to about 65 mrad or alternatively from about 15 mrad to about 32 mrad. In an aspect, the NLO materials of the present disclosure comprise KSrCO.sub.3F, K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F or Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, each of which are characterized by the presence of usable band gaps and birefringence.

[0039] In an aspect, the NLO materials of the present disclosure comprise KSrCO.sub.3F, K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F or Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F which display (i) moderate birefringence (i.e. ˜0.06) (ii) no walk-off issues (iii) are non-hygroscopic and (iv) form large, high quality single crystals. As will be understood by the ordinarily skilled artisans, large crystals are useful for technological NLO applications, and, as used herein, a “large” crystal is one that is commercially viable, in some aspects, a crystal suitable for use in the present disclosure has a minimum diameter of about 2 mm in at least two directions (e.g., the smallest dimension that is not a thickness is greater than 2 mm), alternative from about 2 mm to about 20 mm alternatively from about 3 mm to about 15 mm or alternatively from about 5 mm to about 10 mm.

[0040] In an aspect, the NLO materials of the present disclosure may form high quality crystals wherein the term “high quality” as used herein refers to a crystal that is optically clear and exhibits a full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of a Bragg reflection of <100″ (arc seconds). In an aspect, the NLO materials of the present disclosure form high quality single crystals with minimum diameters in the ranges disclosed herein.

[0041] In an aspect, a NLO of the present disclosure has the general formula XLi.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F wherein X comprises potassium (K) and strontium (Sr), alternatively X comprises K.sub.3Sr.sub.3. In an aspect, X comprises rubidium (Rb) and barium (Ba), alternatively, X comprises Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3.

[0042] Disclosed herein are single crystals and methods of growing large (multi-mm) single crystals of KSrCO.sub.3F, a nonlinear optical material that can generate 266 nm radiation. As noted, crystals of KSrCO.sub.3F do not suffer from walk-off issues and are not hygroscopic. It is to be appreciated that as the generation of 266 nm radiation through second-harmonic generation occurs by using large single crystals, powders would not be desirable for this purpose.

[0043] In an aspect, an NLO of the present disclosure comprises a crystal of KSrCO.sub.3F. A crystal of KSrCO.sub.3F may be grown using any suitable methodology (e.g., top-seeded solution growth method) using KF—Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 as a flux with SrCO.sub.3 The components used to prepare the NLO were used in amounts that provided a ratio of 7:10:3-SrCO.sub.3:KF:Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 in the reaction mixture which was then heated to a temperature in the range of from about 600° C. to about 700° C. alternatively from about 615° C. to about 675° C. or alternatively from about 625° C. to about 650° C. at a heating rate of from about 25° C./hour to about 100° C./hour for a time period of from about 12 hours to about 48 hours or alternatively from about 18 hours to about 36 hours. In some aspects, NLO materials of the present disclosure may be present in amounts to provide ratios of SrCO.sub.3:KF:Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 of from about 1 to about 10: from about 5 to about 15: from about 1 to about 10 in the reaction mixture.

[0044] In an aspect, the NLO materials disclosed herein may be used as a material for converting the wavelength of laser light. In other aspects, the NLO materials disclosed herein may be components of a device such as a laser. It should, however, be noted that the use of the NLO materials of the present disclosure is by no means limited to wavelength converting devices and it can be applied to any devices that utilize the nonlinear optical effect. Other devices than wavelength converters with which the nonlinear optical material of the present invention can be used include optical bistable devices (e.g. optical memory devices, light pulse waveform control devices, photolimiters, differential amplifiers, phototransistors, A/D converters, optical logic devices, photomultivibrators and optical flip-flop circuits), optical modulators and phase conjugated optical devices.

EXAMPLES

[0045] The disclosure having been generally described, the following examples are given as particular aspects of the disclosure and to demonstrate the practice and advantages thereof. It is understood that the examples are given by way of illustration and are not intended to limit the specification of the claims to follow in any manner.

Fabrication and Characterization of LiAlBOF-Based NLO Materials

[0046] FIG. 1 is a powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) Polycrystalline K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was synthesized through solid-state methods using stoichiometric amounts of the reagents. The phase purity was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction, the results of which are shown in FIG. 1. A single crystal of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was obtained through a Li.sub.2O—SrF.sub.2—B.sub.2O.sub.3 flux, and its crystal structure was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction (Table 1). K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystallizes in chiral acentric trigonal space group R32 (No. 155). The B.sup.3+ cations are coordinated to three oxygen atoms to form the BO.sub.3 triangles. The Al.sup.3+ and Li.sup.+ atoms are bonded with four anions—four oxygen atoms for Al.sup.3+ and three oxygen atoms and one fluoride for Li.sup.+ to form the AlO.sub.4 and LiO.sub.3F tetrahedra, respectively.

[0047] A plurality of single crystals of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was grown from a high temperature solution using the flux. The K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was grown by combining a mixture of SrCO.sub.3 (0.03 mol, 4.420 g), K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.01-0.03 mol, 1.38-4.1463 g), Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.01-0.05 mol, 0.0738-3.69 g), LiF (0.01-0.05 mol, 0.259-1.295 g), H.sub.3BO.sub.3 (0.1-0.3 mol, 6.183-18.549 g) and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.04 mol, 4.078 g). The mixture was melt at 850° C. and held at this temperature for 20 h to form a homogeneous melt. The melt quickly cooled down to 750-700° C., a platinum wire was promptly dipped into melt. The temperature was further decreased to 700-650° C. at a rate of 5° C./d, then the platinum wire was pulled out of the melt and allowed to cool to room temperature at a rate of 20° C./h. Colorless, transparent crystals were grow in in this manner. Thus, a Be-free deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has been successfully synthesized herein. K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F possess a short cut-off edge, ˜190 nm, and the SHG responses are 1.7×KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 and 0.3×β-BaB.sub.2O.sub.4 at 1064 and 532 nm incident radiation, respectively. The refractive indices measurement reveals a suitable birefringence of 0.0616 at 532 nm.

[0048] Reagents. SrCO.sub.3 and K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.0%), Li.sub.2CO.sub.3, LiF and H.sub.3BO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.5%), and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.99%) were used as starting materials.

[0049] Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD). The purity of the samples was confirmed by powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD). PXRD was performed on a PANalytical X'Pert PRO diffractometer equipped with a diffracted-beamed monochromatic set for Cu Kα (λ=1.54056 Å) radiation. The scanning step width was 0.02° and a fixed counting time is 1 s/step from 10° to 70° in 2θ. FIG. 1 is a powder x-ray diffraction graph of the actual, experimental, and calculated PXRD patterns, which are in good agreement.

[0050] Crystal Growth. The crystals of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F were grown from a high temperature solution using the flux. The K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was grown by combining a mixture of SrCO.sub.3 (0.03 mol, 4.420 g), K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.015 mol, 2.073 g), Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.025 mol, 1.845 g), LiF (0.02 mol, 0.518 g), H.sub.3BO.sub.3 (0.1 mol, 6.183 g) and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.01 mol, 1.01 g). The mixture was melt at 850° C. and held at this temperature for 20 h to form a homogeneous solution. The solution quickly cooled down to 750° C., a platinum wire was promptly dipped into solution. The temperature was further decreased to 700° C. at a rate of 5° C./d, then the platinum wire was pulled out of the solution and allowed to cool to room temperature at a rate of 20° C./h. Colorless, transparent crystals that used for the seed crystal had crystallized on the platinum wire.

[0051] In another example, a plurality of large single crystals were grown by TSSG method by the Li.sub.2O—SrF.sub.2—B.sub.2O.sub.3 flux. The K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was grown by combining a mixture of SrCO.sub.3 (0.2 mol, 29.46 g), K.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.075 mol, 10.37 g), Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 (0.125 mol, 9.24 g), LiF (0.1 mol, 2.59 g), H.sub.3BO.sub.3 (0.35 mol, 21.64 g) and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.05 mol, 5.05 g). The mixture was melted at 850° C. and held at this temperature for 24 h to form a homogeneous solution. The solution was cooled down to 750° C. at a rate of 20° C./h. The Pt wire was dipped into the solution for 30 minutes to determine the saturation temperature. A saturation temperature of 720° C. was determined by introducing a K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F seed crystal to the solution and holding it for 48 h. During this time the seed crystal did not grow or dissolve, and no additional crystals were formed. A K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F seed crystal was introduced into the solution at 725° C. and held for 2 h that allowed the seed crystal surface to solution. The solution was cooled to the saturation temperature, 720° C., over 1 h. A large K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was gown by cooling the solution at a rate of 0.2° C./d to 716° C. and the seed crystal rotates at 10 rpm that controls by a Crystal growth Furnace Lifting Structure. The crystal was pulled out of solution and cooled at a rate of 10° C./h to room temperature. The total time for crystal growth was 27 d.

[0052] Single-crystal X-ray diffraction. A colorless block crystal (0.146×0.103×0.081 mm.sup.3) was selected for single-crystal diffraction analysis. Data were collected on a Bruker platform diffractometer equipped with a 4K CCD APEX II detector equipped with a diffracted-beamed graphite monochromatic set for Mo Kα radiation. For each sample, a hemisphere of data (3061 frames at 6 cm detector distance) was collected by a narrow-frame algorithm. The scan width was 0.30° in omega and the exposure time was 30 s per frame. The data including diffraction intensity, cell refinement and other related parameters were integrated using Bruker SAINT program. An empirical absorption correction was applied on the entire diffraction data. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods by the SHELXS-97 program and refined with the final least-squares program SHELXL. The PLATON program was used to check the structure, and no other higher symmetry was found. Relevant crystallographic data, selected bond distances and angles, atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Crystal data and structure refinement for Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. Empirical formula Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F Formula weight 905.82 Temperature 293 (2) K. Wavelength 0.71073 A Crystal system, space group Rhombohedral, R32 Unit cell dimensions a = 8.6035 (5) A b = 8.6035 (5) A c = 24.007 (3) A Volume 1538.9 (2) Å.sup.3 Z, Calculated density 3, 2.932 Mg/m.sup.3 Absorption coefficient 8.658 mm.sup.−1 F (000) 1284 Crystal size 0.146 × 0.103 × 0.051 mm.sup.3 Theta range for data 2.55 to 27.54 deg. Limiting indices −11 ≤ h ≤ 11, −11 ≤ k ≤ 10, −31 ≤ l ≤ 29 Reflections collected/ 3079/795 [R(int) = 0.0284] Completeness to theta = 99.80% Absorption correction Numerical Max. and min. transmission 0.7456 and 0.6013 Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F.sup.2 Data/restraints/parameters 795/0/62 Goodness-of-fit on F.sup.2 0.908 Final R indices R1 = 0.0161, wR2 = 0.0375 R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0172, wR2 = 0.0377 Absolute structure 0.029 (8) Largest diff. peak and hole 0.286 and −0.305 e. Å.sup.−3 .sup.[a] R.sub.1 = Σ||F.sub.o| − |F.sub.c||/Σ|F.sub.o| and wR.sub.2 = [Σw(F.sub.o.sup.2 − F.sub.c.sup.2).sup.2/Σw Fo.sup.4].sup.1/2 for F.sub.o.sup.2 > 2σ(F.sub.o.sup.2)

[0053] Table 2 shows the Atomic coordinates (×104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (A.sup.2×10.sup.3) for Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F as well as the bond valence sum (BVS) and the U(eq), which is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Atom x y z U(eq) BVS Li (1) 3333 6667 5873 (3) 8 (2) 1.09 K (1) 334 (1) 3667 (1) 6667 21 (1) 0.83 Sr (1) 3594 (1) 10000 5000 10 (1) 1.89 Al (1) 0 10000 5922 (1) 8 (1) 3.11 Al (2) −3333 3333 5992 (1) 8 (1) 3.22 B (1) −88 (4) 6716 (4) 5680 (2) 10 (1) 2.96 O (1) −1224 (3) 4862 (3) 5728 (1) 16 (1) 2.10 O (2) −900 (2) 7778 (3) 5689 (1) 13 (1) 2.01 O (3) 1665 (3) 7374 (2) 5606 (1) 21 (1) 1.89 O (4) 0 10000 6634 (1) 24 (1) 2.00 F (1) 3333 6667 6667 21 (1) 1.07

[0054] Thermal Analysis. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on an EXSTAR TG/DTA 6300 instrument. Approximately 23 mg of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F were placed in a platinum pan and heated at a rate of 10° C./min from room temperature to 1200° C. under flowing N2.

[0055] Powder SHG Measurement. Powder SHG measurements were performed on a modified Kurtz-NLO system using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser (Quantel Laser, Ultra 50) with a wavelength of 1064 and 532 nm. As the powder SHG response has been shown to strongly depend on particle size, the K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F sample was ground and sieved into distinct particle size ranges (<20, 20-45, 45-63, 63-75, 75-90, 90-125, 125-150 μm) to investigate its phase-matching behavior. Polycrystalline KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 (KDP) and β-BaB.sub.2O.sub.4 (β-BBO) were also sieved into similar particle sizes for SHG response comparison.

[0056] Optical Spectra Measurement. FIG. 12 is a graph of the transmission spectrum of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was measured using a Shimadzu SolidSpec-3700DUV spectrophotometer from 190 to 2600 nm. A piece of (001) crystal wafer with a thickness of 1 mm was used to perform the measurement. FIG. 13 is a graph of the IR Spectrum of Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. The infrared (IR) spectrum data of FIG. 13 was collected on a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 470 FTIR spectrometer from 400 to 4000 cm.sup.−1. Table 6 illustrates the data associated with FIG. 13.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 6 Results from IR Spectrum of Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. Mode description Peaks (cm.sup.−1) Asymmetric stretching of B.sub.3—O 1362, 1168 Symmetric stretching of B.sub.3—O 993 Out-of-plane bending of B.sub.3—O 736, 660 bending of B.sub.3—O 536 Stretching-bending vibrations of 486, 441 AlO.sub.4 units

[0057] Refractive Index Measurement. The refractive indices of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F were determined using a Metricon Model 2010/M prism coupler (Metricon Co.) at five different wavelengths: 450.2, 532, 636.5, 829.3, and 1062.6 nm. A (001) wafer was polished by the Unipol-300 grinding/polishing machine (MTI Co.) for the measurement.

[0058] FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of how the AlO.sub.4 and LiO.sub.3F tetrahedra connect with isolated BO.sub.3 triangles to create [Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F]c double-layers that contain nine coordinated K.sup.+ cations within the layer, and eight coordinated Sr.sup.2+ cations between the layers. The structure may be written as [4(AlO.sub.4/2).sup.− 6(BO.sub.3/2).sup.0 2(LiO.sub.3/2F.sub.1/2).sup.2.5−].sup.9− with charge balance retained by three K.sup.+ and three Sr.sup.2+ cations. The double-layers consist of two [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.6].sub.∞ single layers that are linked by oxygen and fluoride atoms.

[0059] FIG. 3 is as schematic illustration of the ab-plane of an NLO material fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3, with respect to connectivity, the AlO.sub.4 and the LiO.sub.3F tetrahedra are linked to the BO.sub.3 groups through oxygen forming rings wherein the K.sup.+ cations reside. In addition, the reported bond lengths are consistent with those of previously reported compounds. Bond valence calculations are consistent with the reported oxidation states (see Tables 2 and 3). The IR spectrum also confirms the extence of the BO.sub.3 and AlO.sub.4 groups (see FIG. 12).

[0060] Table 3 shows the bond lengths [A] and angles [deg] for Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Li(1)-F(1) 1.905 (8) F(1)-K(1)-O(2)#7 127.39 (3) Li(1)-O(3)#1 1.928 (3) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(2)#7 83.73 (6) Li(1)-O(3)#2 1.928 (3) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(2)#7 54.40 (6) Li(1)-O(3) 1.928 (3) O(1)-K(1)-O(2)#7 66.00 (5) K(1)-F(1) 2.5808 (8) O(1)#5-K(1)-O(2)#7 110.16 (6) K(1)-O(4)#3 3.0226 (5) O(3)#2-K(1)-O(2)#7 61.58 (5) K(1)-O(4)#4 3.0226 (5) O(3)#6-K(1)-O(2)#7 165.36 (6) K(1)-O(1) 3.0511 (17) F(1)-K(1)-O(2)#8 127.39 (3) K(1)-O(1)#5 3.0512 (17) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(2)#8 54.40 (6) K(1)-O(3)#2 3.099 (2) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(2)#8 83.73 (6) K(1)-O(3)#6 3.099 (2) O(1)-K(1)-O(2)#8 110.15 (6) K(1)-O(2)#7 3.1326 (18) O(1)#5-K(1)-O(2)#8 66.00 (5) K(1)-O(2)#8 3.1326 (18) O(3)#2-K(1)-O(2)#8 165.37 (6) Sr(1)-O(3) 2.4948 (18) O(3)#6-K(1)-O(2)#8 61.58 (5) Sr(1)-O(3)#9 2.4948 (18) O(2)#7-K(1)-O(2)#8 105.22 (7) Sr(1)-O(1)#1 2.5500 (17) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(3)#9 155.48 (9) Sr(1)-O(1)#10 2.5500 (17) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(1)#1 90.90 (7) Sr(1)-O(2)#11 2.6010 (16) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(1)#1 104.70 (7) Sr(1)-O(2)#12 2.6011 (16) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(1)#10 104.70 (7) Sr(1)-O(3)#10 3.176 (2) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(1)#10 90.89 (7) Sr(1)-O(3)#1 3.1759 (19) O(1)#1-Sr(1)-O(1)#10 101.27 (8) Al(1)-O(4) 1.710 (3) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(2)#11 86.05 (6) Al(1)-O(2) 1.757 (2) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(2)#11 77.48 (6) Al(1)-O(2)#13 1.757 (2) O(1)#1-Sr(1)-O(2)#11 176.22 (5) Al(1)-O(2)#12 1.757 (2) O(1)#10-Sr(1)-O(2)#11 81.68 (6) Al(2)-O(4)#3 1.698 (3) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(2)#12 77.48 (6) Al(2)-O(1)#7 1.742 (2) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(2)#12 86.05 (6) Al(2)-O(1) 1.742 (2) O(1)#1-Sr(1)-O(2)#12 81.68 (6) Al(2)-O(1)#14 1.743 (2) O(1)#10-Sr(1)-O(2)#12 176.22 (5) B(1)-O(3) 1.332 (3) O(2)#11-Sr(1)-O(2)#12 95.48 (8) B(1)-O(1) 1.398 (4) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 137.99 (2) B(1)-O(2) 1.401 (3) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 66.18 (8) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3)#1 109.5 (2) O(1)#1-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 70.59 (5) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3)#2 109.5 (2) O(1)#10-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 47.11 (6) O(3)#1-Li(1)-O(3)#2 109.5 (2) O(2)#11-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 113.18 (5) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3) 109.5 (2) O(2)#12-Sr(1)-O(3)#10 132.87 (5) O(3)#1-Li(1)-O(3) 109.5 (2) O(3)-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 66.18 (8) O(3)#2-Li(1)-O(3) 109.5 (2) O(3)#9-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 137.99 (2) F(1)-K(1)-O(4)#3 124.706 (13) O(1)#1-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 47.11 (6) F(1)-K(1)-O(4)#4 124.705 (13) O(1)#10-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 70.59 (5) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(4)#4 110.59 (3) O(2)#11-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 132.87 (5) F(1)-K(1)-O(1) 92.93 (5) O(2)#12-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 113.18 (5) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(1) 55.77 (6) O(3)#10-Sr(1)-O(3)#1 74.03 (7) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(1) 120.29 (6) O(4)-Al(1)-O(2) 108.56 (7) F(1)-K(1)-O(1)#5 92.93 (5) O(4)-Al(1)-O(2)#13 108.57 (7) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(1)#5 120.29 (6) O(2)-Al(1)-O(2)#13 110.36 (7) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(1)#5 55.77 (6) O(4)-Al(1)-O(2)#12 108.57 (7) O(1)-K(1)-O(1)#5 174.14 (9) O(2)-Al(1)-O(2)#12 110.36 (7) F(1)-K(1)-O(3)#2 66.12 (4) O(2)#13-Al(1)-O(2)#12 110.36 (7) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(3)#2 125.53 (7) O(4)#3-Al(2)-O(1)#7 111.30 (8) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(3)#2 83.10 (6) O(4)#3-Al(2)-O(1) 111.29 (8) O(1)-K(1)-O(3)#2 71.54 (5) O(1)#7-Al(2)-O(1) 107.59 (8) O(1)#5-K(1)-O(3)#2 110.98 (5) O(4)#3-Al(2)-O(1)#14 111.30 (8) F(1)-K(1)-O(3)#6 66.12 (4) O(1)#7-Al(2)-O(1)#14 107.59 (8) O(4)#3-K(1)-O(3)#6 83.10 (6) O(1)-Al(2)-O(1)#14 107.59 (8) O(4)#4-K(1)-O(3)#6 125.52 (7) O(3)-B(1)-O(1) 119.5 (2) O(1)-K(1)-O(3)#6 110.98 (5) O(3)-B(1)-O(2) 123.6 (2) O(1)#5-K(1)-O(3)#6 71.54 (5) O(1)-B(1)-O(2) 116.8 (2) O(3)#2-K(1)-O(3)#6 132.24 (8)

[0061] Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms for Table 3: #1 −x+y,−x+1,z; #2 −y+1,x−y+1,z; #3 y−4/3,x+⅓,−z+4/3; #4 x,y−1,z; #5 y−⅓,x+⅓,−z+4/3; #6 x−y+⅔,−y+4/3,−z+4/3; #7 −x+y−1,−x,z; #8 −x−⅓,−x+y−⅔,−z+4/3; #9 x−y+1,−y+2,−z+1; #10 y,x+1,−z+1; #11 −x,−x+y,−z+1; #12 −y+1,x−y+2,z; #13 −x+y−1,−x+1,z; #14 −y,x−y+1,z; #15 x,y+1,z #16 x−1,y−1,z; #17 y−⅓,x+4/3,−z+4/3.

[0062] Three structural features are evident in K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. First, the BO.sub.3 groups exhibit a coplanar configuration that favors a large (d.sub.ij>0.39 pm/V) SHG response and moderate birefringence (e.g., d.sub.n=0.05-0.09). Second, the oxygen atoms on the BO.sub.3 groups are fully bonded, i.e. there are no dangling oxygen bonds, and, thus, a short absorption edge is observed. Third, the remaining Al—O and Li—F bonds connect the [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.6].sub.∞ layer to create the double layers that generate stability and facilitate crystal growth. Before delving into the crystal growth and associated properties, a discussion on the powder SHG efficiency, thermal and moisture stabilities is desirable.

[0063] FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs of the powder SHG results for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to aspects of the present disclosure. The powder SHG efficiencies, as a function of particle size, was measured at 1064 nm (FIG. 4A) and 532 nm (FIG. 4B). It is clear that the SHG intensities increase with the increasing of particle sizes for both wavelengths indicating that K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is phase-matchable at both wavelengths, consistent with the phase-matching calculations based on experimental refractive index data. The SHG efficienes of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F at 1064 nm and 532 nm are approximately 1.7×KDP and 0.3×β-BBO respectively, in the 125-150 μm particle size range. Thermal analysis and moisture stability experiments were also performed. FIG. 14 is a graph of the TG/DTA data for Li.sub.2K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. FIG. 14 indicates an endothermic peak around 812° C. Above 812° C., K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F decomposes to K.sub.2Al.sub.2B.sub.2O.sub.7 and other unknown phases. With respect to moisture stability, a 0.1930 g crystal of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was submerged in water for one week. After one week the crystal was removed from the water and reweighed.

[0064] FIG. 5 is a photograph of an indexed single crystal of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. Large single crystals of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F were grown by the top seeded-solution growth (TSSG) technique discussed herein. Based on Bravais-Friedel-Donnay-Harker (BFDH) theory, the calculated morphology of FIG. 5 is consistent with that of the grown crystal. One issue with KBBF and SBBO is the tendency to layer along the optic axis, i.e. the c-axis, that hinders large crystal growth. As seen in FIG. 5, the crystal dimension along the c-axis is 5 mm that suggests the short double-layer distance in K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F favors large crystal growth.

[0065] FIG. 6 is a graph of the refractive-index for a wafer of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F that was manufactured according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. The sample, shown in the inset in FIG. 6, was cut and polished to obtain the optical measurements in FIG. 6. The transmission spectrum of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was collected on a 1 mm thick crystal at room temperature (see experimental section).

[0066] FIG. 16 is a graph of transmission and wavelength for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. An absorption edge of 190 nm was determined, as is shown in FIG. 16. The refractive index was measured at at five wavelengths −450.2, 532, 636.5, 829.3, and 1062.2 nm, using the prism coupling technique, in order to determine the birefringence. A (001) crystal wafer was polished for the measurements, as shown in the inset in FIG. 6. As n.sub.o>n.sub.e, K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F may be considered a negative uniaxial crystal, with the birefringence (Δn=n.sub.o−n.sub.e) ranging from 0.0574-0.0637 over the measured wavelength range. The Sellmeier equation, n.sub.i.sup.2=A+B/(λ.sup.2−C)−Dλ.sup.2, can be fit to the measured refractive index data. The calculated and experimental refractive indices and Sellmeier coefficients are given (Tables 4 and 5). The data in Tables 4 and 5 enables the determination of the birefreingence. This data is fitted using the Sellmeier quations, which are the curves in FIG. 6, and is used to determine the phase-matching wavelength range in FIG. 7.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Experimental and calculated refractive indices for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. n.sub.o n.sub.e λ/μm Exp. Calc. Exp. Calc. Δn = n.sub.o-n.sub.e 0.4502 1.6020 1.6020 1.5383 1.5382 0.0637 0.5320 1.5931 1.5932 1.5315 1.5321 0.0616 0.6365 1.5872 1.5870 1.5283 1.5275 0.0589 0.8293 1.5809 1.5810 1.5222 1.5227 0.0587 1.0626 1.5771 1.5771 1.5197 1.5196 0.0574

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Sellmeier coefficients derived from the measured refractive indices. A B C D n.sub.o 2.48387 0.01414 0.03468 0.00855 n.sub.e 2.30376 0.01268 0.00212 0.00525

[0067] FIG. 7 is a graph of the calculated refractive index dispersion curves, based on the Sellmeier equations, for the samples of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F manufactured according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. The red solid and green dashed lines represent the calculated refractive indices for the fundamental and second harmonic wavelengths, i.e. n(ω) and n(2ω), whereas the blue dashed line represents (n.sub.o(ω)+n.sub.e(ω))/2. Type I phase-matching occurs when n(ω)=n(2ω), or in FIG. 7 when the red solid line crosses the green dashed line. This is indicated by black circles. By drawing vertical lines from these black circles to the upper and lower x-axes, the type I phase-matching wavelength range was determined. K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is type I phase-matchable for fundamental (second-harmonic) radiation from 448-4970 nm (224-2485 nm). Type II phase-matching occurs when (n.sub.o(ω)+n.sub.e(ω))/2=n.sub.e(2ω), i.e. the blue circles in FIG. 7. Similar to the type I phase-matching wavelength range, the type II phase-matching range was determined by drawing vertical lines from the blue circles to the upper and lower x-axes. The type II phase-matching wavelength range for fundamental (second-harmonic) radiation is 670-3904 nm (335-1952 nm). Thus, the SHG limit for K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is 224 nm, indicating that the material can achieve FHG and produce 266 nm light from 1064 nm laser. As such, K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F may be a viable replacement for β-BaB.sub.2O.sub.4 and CsLiB.sub.6O.sub.10

[0068] Addressing the layering tendency of NLO KBe.sub.2BO.sub.3F.sub.2 (KBBF) and Sr.sub.2Be.sub.2B.sub.2O.sub.7 (SBBO), large crystals of K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F were fabricated. The NLO active material exhibits an absorption edge of 190 nm, and is SHG active at 1064 nm and 532 nm. Large single crystals were grown using the top-seeded solution growth method. Optical measurements on these crystals revealed a moderate birefringence of 0.0574 at 1064 nm. Calculations indicate a Type I phase-matching wavelength behavior for fundamental (second-harmonic) radiation between 448-4970 nm (224-2485 nm) indicating that K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is a viable material to generate 266 nm by FHG.

[0069] Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystals were grown by the top seed solution growth (TSSG) method according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. Some small Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystals with regular shape were picked from the crystals obtained by the above method and were used as seed crystals. And then a clear and homogeneous solution was prepared by using the same program as given above. A relatively large seed was attached to the platinum rod and was soaked in the solution. By observing the growth or dissolution of the seed, a saturation temperature of 712° C. was determined. Then a high quality Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F seed was dipped into the surface of the solution at 10° C. higher than the saturation temperature. This was followed by decreasing the temperature to the saturation point over 40 min. From this temperature, the solution was cooled at a rate of 0.25° C. per day. After the desired crystal size was obtained, the Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was pulled out of the solution and cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10° C./h.

[0070] A crystal of KSrCO.sub.3F was grown by the top-seeded solution growth method using KF—Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 as a flux. KF, SrCO.sub.3, and Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 with a molar ratio 10:7:3 were placed in an alumina crucible, heated to 630° C. at a heating rate of 100° C./h and held for 50 h in order to form a homogenous melt. Crystals of KSrCO.sub.3F were first grown by spontaneous crystallization, i.e. crystals formed on an alumina rod dipped into the melt. Seed crystals were selected from these spontaneously grown crystals. A crystallization temperature of 611° C. was determined by observing the growth or dissolution of the seed crystals when dipped into the melt. An oriented seed crystal was introduced into the melt at a rotation rate of 5 rpm at 2° C. higher than the crystallization temperature of 611° C. in order to reduce surface defects of the seed. The temperature was decreased to the crystallization temperature at a cooling rate of 0.5° C./min. From the crystallization temperature, the melt was cooled at a rate of 0.5° C. per day to 590° C. When the crystal growth process was done, i.e. by observing the gap between the growing crystal and the crucible wall (when the crystal edge is very close to the crucible wall the crystal growth is considered completed), the crystal was pulled from the melt and cooled (20° C./h) to room temperature. In the above manner, high quality and large single crystals of KSrCO.sub.3F can be grown for nonlinear optical applications.

[0071] Synthesis. Polycrystalline Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was synthesized by conventional solid-state methods. Stoichiometric amount of Rb.sub.2CO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99%), BaCO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.8%) and BaF.sub.2 (Alfa Aesar, 99%) Li.sub.2CO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.0%), Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.997%), H.sub.3BO.sub.3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.8%) were ground thoroughly and pressed into pellet. The pellet was placed on a platinum plate and heated to 300° C. for 20 h to decompose carbonates and H.sub.3BO.sub.3, and then the temperature was raised to 630° C., held for 5 days, with several intermittent grindings. Laboratory powder x-ray diffraction indicated pure Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was obtained, FIG. 12 illustrates a graph of the IR spectrum of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0072] Crystal Growth. The centimeter-size Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was grown by TSSG method with Li.sub.2O—BaF.sub.2—B.sub.2O.sub.3. The seed was obtained by recrystallize the Stoichiometric amount of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F melts. Then a clear and homogeneous solution was prepared by using melt Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F and flux at molar ratio Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F:Li.sub.2O:BaF.sub.2:B.sub.2O.sub.3=1:4:3:5 at 750° C. for 10 h. A relatively large seed was attached to the platinum rod and was soaked in the solution. By observing the growth or dissolution of the seed, a saturation temperature of 712° C. was determined. Then a high quality Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F seed was dipped into the surface of the solution at 10° C. higher than the saturation temperature. This was followed by decreasing the temperature to the saturation point over 40 min. From this temperature, the solution was cooled at a rate of 0.25° C. per day. After the desired crystal size was obtained, the Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal was pulled out of the solution and cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10° C./h.

[0073] Structural characterization: Single X-ray diffraction data with 3061 frames at 6 cm detector distance was collected on a Bruker SMART APEX2 diffractometer equipped with a 4K CCD area detector using graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). Data were integrated using the Bruker SAINT program. Absorption corrections based on the multiscan technique were applied. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97. All atoms were refined using full matrix least-squares techniques, final least-squares refinement is on F.sub.o.sup.2 with data having F.sub.o.sup.2≥2α (F.sub.o.sup.2). The structure was checked with PLATON and no higher symmetry was found.

[0074] Infrared Spectroscopy. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra in the 400-4000 cm.sup.−1 range were recorded on a Bruker Tensor 37 FTIR (see FIG. 12).

[0075] Thermal analysis: The thermal property of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was measured on EXSTAR TG/DTA 6300 instrument under flowing nitrogen gas, heated from room temperature to 1100° C. at a rate of 10° C. min.sup.−1 in a platinum crucible (see FIG. 9A).

[0076] (Vacuum) UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectra: The UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectrum was measured at room temperature with a Cary 5000 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer in the 200-2500 nm wavelength range (see FIG. 11C).

[0077] SHG Measurement. Powder SHG were measured by using the Kurtz-Perry method with Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers at the wavelength of 1064 nm and 532 nm..sup.[33] Polycrystalline samples of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F and KH.sub.2PO.sub.4 (KDP) were ground and sieved into distinct particle size ranges (<20, 20-45, 45-63, 63-75, 75-90, 90-125, >125 μm). Sieved KDP powder was used as a reference. The intensity of the frequency-doubled output emitted from the sample was measured using a photomultiplier tube.

[0078] Refractive Index Measurements: A (100) wafer of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F with size of 7×6×1 mm.sup.3 was polished using a Unipol-300 grinding/polishing machine (MTI Co.) for the refractive index measurements. The measurements were carried out using a Metricon Model 2010/M prism coupler (Metricon Co.) at 450.2, 532, 636.5, 829.3, and 1062.6 nm.

[0079] Laser Damage Threshold Measurement. The measurement was carried out on an Nd:YAG nanosecond laser (Model: Minilite II, Continuum Eletro-Optics, Inc.) at a wavelength of 1064 nm. The laser pulse duration was set at 6 ns, and the frequency was fixed at 15 Hz. The laser beam was focused with a convex lens, resulting in a beam diameter of 0.36 mm.

[0080] FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of the structural evolution from KBBF to Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. The structural evolution from KBBF to Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F may occur because the single-layer structure of KBBF makes it exhibit a strong layer habit. In order to improve the layer habit, the SBBO family, including SBBO, NaCaBe.sub.2(BO.sub.3).sub.2F, and K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, were fabricated. Although the fabricated materials improved the structural stability of KBBF, the double layers are separated by alkaline-earths, leading to the structural instability. In order to thoroughly resolve the layer habit and structural instability issue, the 3D Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was fabricated as discussed herein.

[0081] FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate a TG/DTA curve (FIG. 9A), a recrystallization curve (FIG. 9B), and a photo (FIG. 9C) for NLO materials fabricated according to aspects of the present disclosure. Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3 was synthesized and the phase-purity was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (FIG. 9A), and thermal analysis indicates that Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3 melts congruently with one endothermic (exothermic) peak on heating (cooling) at 856° C. (783 C) (FIG. 9B). The congruent melting behavior is confirmed by the PXRD pattern of the recrystallized Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3 melt above 900 C. A slight weight loss attributable to volatilization of RbF is observed in the thermal analysis. Thus, in order to reduce the crystallization temperature, a Li.sub.2O—BaF.sub.2—B.sub.2O.sub.3 flux was used for the crystal growth. Using the top-seeded solution growth method a large single crystal (12×8×7.6 mm.sup.3) of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was grown and indexed (FIG. 9C). The crystal has a 7.6 mm thickness along the optical axis, c-axis (FIG. 9C).

[0082] FIGS. 10A-10D are schematics of the building blocks and as-fabricated structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

[0083] The structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is illustrated broken out into FIG. 10A, the basic building units of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F are BO.sub.3 triangles, AlO.sub.4 trahedra, and LiO.sub.3F tetrahedral; FIG. 10B, illustrating the building units connect with each other to form [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.11F].sub.∞ layer; FIG. 10C, illustrating the RbO.sub.9F and BaO.sub.10 structures; and FIG. 10D, illustrating that these layers stack along the c axis and connected by Al—O—Al bonding to form 3D framework and Rb and Ba cations filled in the space. Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3 is built up from BO3 triangles, AlO.sub.4 and LiO.sub.3F tetrahedral, illustrated in FIG. 10A. In the ab-plane, the BO.sub.3 triangles are co-planar and are linked through oxygen to LiO.sub.3F and AlO.sub.4 tetrahedra to form a [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.11F].sub.∞ single layer. Additionally, the [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.11F].sub.∞ single layer are bridged by Al(1)-O(4) and Li(1)-F(1) bonds to form a [Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F].sub.∞ double layer. These [Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.2iF].sub.∞ double layers stack along c-axis and are connected by the Al(2)-O(5) bonds to form a three-dimensional (3D) anion framework (FIG. 10D). In connectivity terms the structure may be written as [2(LiO.sub.3/2F.sub.1/2).sup.2.5− 6(BO.sub.3/2).sup.0 4(AlO.sub.4/2).sup.−].sup.9− with charge balance retained by the three Rb+ and three Ba2+ cations. The bond lengths are consistent with previously reported compounds and oxidation states respectively (See Table 8 below).

[0084] The structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F was determined by single X-ray diffraction and is illustrated in Table 6 below.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Crystal data and structure refinement for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. Empirical formula Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F Wavelength 0.71073 Formula weight 786.41 Crystal system Hexagonal Space group P-62c Unit cell dimensions a = 8.7017 (2) Å Z 2 Volume (Å.sup.3) 1113.51 (6) Calculated density (Mg/m.sup.3) 3.561 Absorption coefficient (/mm) 12.018 Reflections collected/unique 6541/888 [R(int) = 0.0254] Completeness to theta (27.47°) 100.0% Goodness-of-fit on F.sup.2 1.080 Final R indices R1 = 0.0148, [I > 2sigma(I)].sup.[a] wR2 = 0.0368 Flack factor 0.031 (16) Extinction coefficient 0.00022 (7) Largest diff. peak and hole 0.916 and −0.660 .sup.[a]R.sub.1 = Σ||F.sub.o| − |F.sub.c||/Σ|F.sub.o| and wR.sub.2 = [Σw(F.sub.o.sup.2 − F.sub.c.sup.2).sup.2/Σw Fo.sup.4].sup.1/2 for F.sub.o.sup.2 > 2σ(F.sub.o.sup.2)
Table 7 lists atomic coordinates (×10.sup.4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å.sup.2×10.sup.3) for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. U.sub.eq is defined as one-third of the trace of the orthogonalized U.sub.ij tensor.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 7 Atom X Y Z U.sub.eq BVS Ba (1) 6285 (1) 6285 (1) 0 13 (1) 1.88 Rb (1) 6998 (1) 6600 (1) 2500 20 (1) 1.02 Li (1) 6667 3333 1347 (6) 12 (2) 0.97 Al (1) 3333 6667 1509 (1) 12 (1) 3.27 Al (2) 10000 10000 1002 (1) 13 (1) 3.14 B (1) 6719 (5) 9916 (5) 1119 (3) 11 (1) 3.03 O (1) 4921 (4) 8698 (4) 1120 (2) 29 (1) 2.15 O (2) 7830 (4) 9275 (3) 1328 (2) 25 (1) 2.05 O (3) 7268 (3) 11598 (4) 918 (1) 21 (1) 1.88 O (4) 3333 6667 2500 47 (2) 2.06 O (5) 10000 10000 0 45 (2) 1.98 F (1) 6667 3333 2500 20 (1) 1.08

[0085] As shown in at least FIG. 10D, structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F exhibits three structural features: 1) All of the B atoms are coordinated in the BO.sub.3 triangles and these BO.sub.3 triangles adopt a coplanar arrangement; 2) The terminal O atoms of BO.sub.3 triangles are bonded by the AlO.sub.4/LiO.sub.3F tetrahedra; 3) the [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.11F].sub.∞ layers stacking along c axis are connected by Al—O covalent bonds to form three-dimensional (3D) framework. Clearly, the first two structural features of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F are similar with KBBF and SBBO, which will favor Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F to exhibit the excellent NLO properties like KBBF and SBBO. However notably, the third structural feature of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F obviously distinguishes from KBBF and SBBO. As shown in FIG. 10D, KBBF contains the [Be.sub.2BO.sub.3F.sub.2].sub.∞ single layers and the [Be.sub.2BO.sub.3F.sub.2].sub.∞ single layers are connected by the weak K—F ion bonds, which lead to the strong layer habit. In SBBO series, SBBO, NaCaBe.sub.2(BO.sub.3).sub.2F and K.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F all have the double-layer structure. Although the double-layer structure improves the layer habit of KBBF, the double layers are separated alkaline-earth cations, Ca.sup.2+, Sr.sup.2+, or Ba.sup.2+, which will lead the structural instability or the anisotropic crystal growth. However in the structure of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, all the [LiAl.sub.2B.sub.3O.sub.11F].sub.∞ layers are connected by the Al—O covalent bonds to form 3D framework. The 3D framework structure will completely resolve the layer habit and structural instability problem in KBBF and SBBO, which has been confirmed by the fact that high quality of bulk Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F without layer habit can be grown by the TSSG method. In addition, in Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, Be.sup.2+ cations, similar with K.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, are substituted by the Li.sup.+/Al.sup.3+ cations. This substitution also makes Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F Be-free. Therefore, in this sense, Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F would overcome all the crystal growth issues in KBBF and SBBO and represents new generation of deep-UV NLO material.

[0086] FIGS. 11A-11D illustrate linear and non-linear optical properties of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. In particular, powder second harmonic generation measurements are illustrated in FIG. 11A at 1064 nm and in FIG. 11B at 532 nm reveal that Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is type-1 phase-matchable. The powder SHG measurements of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F with incident radiations at 1064 nm (FIG. 11A) and 532 nm (FIG. 11B) were also performed, respectively. The measurements indicate that Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has SHG efficiencies of approximately 1.5×KDP and 0.3×β-BBO at 532 nm and 266 nm, respectively, and it can be phase-matchable at both wavelengths. Clearly, the relative large SHG response will favor its application as the deep-UV NLO material.

[0087] FIG. 11C is a graph of the reflectance % v. wavelength, and the transmission spectrum indicates the absorption edge of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is at 198 nm. FIG. 11D is a graph of the refractive index measurement that illustrates Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has a moderate birefrigence, 0.057 at 1064 nm. The UV-vis-NIR diffusion reflection spectrum of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F in the 200-2500 nm wavelength range was shown in FIG. 11C. It is clear that Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has a wide transmission region and the reflectance is higher than 90% from 210 nm to 2500 nm, with a short UV cut-off edge below 200 nm as determined from the UV-vis-IR diffuse-reflectance spectrum (FIG. 11C)). The wide transmission range is comparable with other UV NLO materials, indicating that this material is commercially viable.

[0088] Further, the refractive index of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is also measured by the prism coupling method. The measured n.sub.o and n.sub.e at different wavelengths—450.2, 532, 636.5, 829.3, and 1062.6 nm are listed in Table 8.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 8 Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F Ba(1)-O(3)#1 2.664 (2) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(5) 127.07 (6) Ba(1)-O(3)#2 2.664 (2) O(1)#4-Ba(1)-O(5) 127.07 (6) Ba(1)-O(1)#3 2.681 (2) O(3)#3-Ba(1)-O(5) 140.58 (5) Ba(1)-O(1)#4 2.681 (2) O(3)#4-Ba(1)-O(5) 140.58 (5) Ba(1)-O(3)#3 3.102 (2) O(2)-Ba(1)-O(5) 51.76 (5) Ba(1)-O(3)#4 3.102 (2) O(2)#5-Ba(1)-O(5) 51.76 (5) Ba(1)-O(2) 3.188 (3) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(2)#7 134.66 (6) Ba(1)-O(2)#5 3.188 (3) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(2) 134.66 (6) Ba(1)-O(5) 3.2323 (3) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(2) 87.94 (11) Rb(1)-F(1) 2.7103 (5) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(3)#8 65.84 (5) Rb(1)-O(2)#7 2.867 (2) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(3)#8 69.58 (8) Rb(1)-O(2) 2.867 (2) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(3)#8 144.13 (8) Rb(1)-O(3)#8 3.218 (2) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(3)#1 65.84 (5) Rb(1)-O(3)#1 3.218 (2) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(3)#1 144.13 (8) Rb(1)-O(4) 3.2180 (5) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(3)#1 69.58 (8) Rb(1)-O(1)#4 3.375 (3) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(3)#1 113.19 (8) Rb(1)-O(1)#10 3.375 (3) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(4) 115.604 (17) Rb(1)-O(2)#8 3.443 (3) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(4) 80.55 (6) Rb(1)-O(2)#1 3.443 (3) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(4) 80.55 (6) Li(1)-F(1) 1.957 (11) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(4) 120.59 (4) Li(1)-O(3)#1 1.969 (5) O(3)#1-Rb(1)-O(4) 120.59 (4) Li(1)-O(3)#11 1.969 (5) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 87.51 (5) Li(1)-O(3)#4 1.969 (5) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 128.60 (7) Al(1)-O(4) 1.683 (2) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 70.09 (7) Al(1)-O(1)#14 1.740 (3) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 145.73 (8) Al(1)-O(1) 1.740 (3) O(3)#1-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 70.54 (7) Al(1)-O(1)#4 1.740 (3) O(4)-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 51.03 (5) Al(2)-O(5) 1.701 (2) Li(1)-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 63.78 (10) Al(2)-O(2) 1.754 (3) Li(1)#9-Rb(1)-O(1)#4 111.81 (10) Al(2)-O(2)#15 1.754 (3) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 87.51 (5) Al(2)-O(2)#1 1.754 (3) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 70.09 (7) B(1)-O(3) 1.337 (5) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 128.60 (7) B(1)-O(2) 1.382 (5) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 70.54 (7) B(1)-O(1) 1.383 (5) O(3)#1-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 145.73 (8) O(1)-Ba(1)#14 2.681 (2) O(4)-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 51.03 (5) O(1)-Rb(1)#14 3.375 (3) Li(1)-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 111.81 (10) O(2)-Rb(1)#16 3.443 (3) Li(1)#9-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 63.78 (10) O(3)-Li(1)#17 1.969 (5) O(1)#4-Rb(1)-O(1)#10 87.97 (8) O(3)-Ba(1)#15 2.664 (2) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 95.63 (5) O(3)-Ba(1)#14 3.102 (2) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 53.44 (11) O(3)-Rb(1)#16 3.218 (2) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 101.95 (9) O(4)-Al(1)#10 1.683 (2) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 42.21 (7) O(4)-Rb(1)#14 3.2180 (5) O(3)#1-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 102.97 (6) O(4)-Rb(1)#10 3.2180 (5) O(4)-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 133.48 (5) O(5)-Al(2)#2 1.701 (2) Li(1)-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 114.70 (9) O(5)-Ba(1)#15 3.2323 (3) Li(1)#9-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 74.99 (9) O(5)-Ba(1)#1 3.2323 (3) O(1)#4-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 170.93 (6) F(1)-Li(1)#9 1.957 (11) O(1)#10-Rb(1)-O(2)#8 100.64 (5) F(1)-Rb(1)#12 2.7103 (5) F(1)-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 95.63 (5) F(1)-Rb(1)#9 2.7104 (5) O(2)#7-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 101.95 (9) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(3)#2 151.62 (12) O(2)-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 53.44 (11) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(1)#3 106.25 (8) O(3)#8-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 102.97 (6) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(1)#3 90.90 (9) O(3)#1-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 42.21 (7) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(1)#4 90.90 (9) O(4)-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 133.48 (5) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(1)#4 106.25 (8) Li(1)-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 74.99 (9) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(1)#4 105.86 (13) Li(1)#9-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 114.70 (9) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(3)#3 141.58 (2) O(1)#4-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 100.64 (5) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(3)#3 66.13 (11) O(1)#10-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 170.93 (6) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(3)#3 47.16 (8) O(2)#8-Rb(1)-O(2)#1 70.63 (8) O(1)#4-Ba(1)-O(3)#3 75.44 (7) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3)#1 111.7 (3) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(3)#4 66.13 (11) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3)#11 111.7 (3) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(3)#4 141.58 (2) O(3)#1-Li(1)-O(3)#11 107.1 (3) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(3)#4 75.44 (7) F(1)-Li(1)-O(3)#4 111.7 (3) O(1)#4-Ba(1)-O(3)#4 47.16 (8) O(3)#1-Li(1)-O(3)#4 107.1 (3) O(3)#3-Ba(1)-O(3)#4 78.83 (10) O(3)#11-Li(1)-O(3)#4 107.1 (3) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(2) 72.44 (7) O(4)-Al(1)-O(1)#14 112.32 (11) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(2) 89.89 (7) O(4)-Al(1)-O(1) 112.32 (11) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(2) 178.32 (9) O(1)#14-Al(1)-O(1) 106.48 (12) O(1)#4-Ba(1)-O(2) 75.32 (8) O(4)-Al(1)-O(1)#4 112.32 (11) O(3)#3-Ba(1)-O(2) 134.51 (7) O(1)#14-Al(1)-O(1)#4 106.48 (12) O(3)#4-Ba(1)-O(2) 104.79 (6) O(1)-Al(1)-O(1)#4 106.48 (12) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 89.89 (7) O(5)-Al(2)-O(2) 108.39 (11) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 72.44 (7) O(5)-Al(2)-O(2)#15 108.39 (11) O(1)#3-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 75.32 (8) O(2)-Al(2)-O(2)#15 110.54 (10) O(1)#4-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 178.32 (9) O(5)-Al(2)-O(2)#1 108.39 (11) O(3)#3-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 104.79 (6) O(2)-Al(2)-O(2)#1 110.54 (10) O(3)#4-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 134.51 (7) O(2)#15-Al(2)-O(2)#1 110.53 (10) O(2)-Ba(1)-O(2)#5 103.52 (10) O(3)-B(1)-O(2) 124.6 (3) O(3)#1-Ba(1)-O(5) 75.81 (6) O(3)-B(1)-O(1) 119.2 (3) O(3)#2-Ba(1)-O(5) 75.81 (6) O(2)-B(1)-O(1) 116.2 (3)

[0089] Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms for Table 3: #1 −y+2,x−y+1,z #2 x−y+1,−y+2,−z #3 −x+1,−x+y,−z #4 −x+y,−x+1,z #5 y,x,−z, #6 x−y,−y+1,−z #7 x,y,−z+½ #8 −y+2,x−y+1,−z+½ #9 −x+y+1,−x+1,−z+½ #10 −x+y,−x+1,−z+½ #11 x,y−1,z #12 −y+1,x−y,z #13 −x+y+1,−x+1,z #14 −y+1,x−y+1,z #15 −x+y+1,−x+2,z #16 −x+y+1,−x+2,−z+½ #17 x,y+1,z.

[0090] Based on the measurement, the following Sellmeier equations for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, i.e. the refractive indices, n.sub.o(λ) and n.sub.e(λ) as a function of wavelength λ were fitted by the least-squares method.

[00001]$n_o^2=2.5.Math.4.Math.1.Math.8.Math.1+\frac{0.0.Math.2.Math.0.Math.2.Math.8}{{\lambda }^2+0.0.Math.0.Math.2.Math.8.Math.5}-0.0.Math.0.Math.3.Math.6.Math.6.Math.{\lambda }^2$$n_e^2=2.362.Math.6.Math.3+\frac{0.01569}{{\lambda }^2+0.000.Math.5.Math.5.Math.9}+0.0.Math.0.Math.0.Math.0.Math.1.Math.3.Math.2.Math.{\lambda }^2$

[0091] The experimental and calculated refractive indices are in agreement, as shown in FIG. 11D. And for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F, it is clear that a moderate birefringence is observed (˜0.057 at 1064 nm). The suitable birefringence suggests that Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F is a promising deep-UV NLO material.

[0092] In addition, the laser damage threshold measurement at 1064 nm with 6 ns pulse width shows Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has a damage threshold larger than 1 GW/cm.sup.2, which is comparable with commercialized NLO crystals. FIGS. 15A and 15B are before (15A) and after (15B) images of a high quality Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F crystal that was placed in water for a week with no decomposition or degradation observed. These properties of Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F also satisfy the requirements of deep-UV NLO materials.

[0093] In conclusion, based on crystal structural engineering design, a new deep-UV NLO material Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F has been successfully designed and synthesized. This compound retains the structural priority of KBBF and SBBO, but the structure features a 3D framework, which make Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F thoroughly resolve the layer habit and structural instability issues in KBBF and SBBO. Meanwhile, Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F exhibits excellent NLO properties, including relatively large SHG response, ˜1.5×KDP and 0.3×β-BBO at 532 nm and 266 nm, respectively, the short UV cut-off edge, and the suitable birefringence may be about at least 0.06. In addition, this compound melts congruently and high quality of single crystal with size of 12×8×7.6 mm.sup.3 was grown.

[0094] Table 9 illustrates wavelengths and refractive indexes for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F fabricated according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 9 Measured and calculated values for Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F. Wavelength n.sub.o n.sub.e (nm) Measured Fitted Measured Fitted Δn 450.2 1.6247 1.6247 1.562 1.5620 0.0627 532 1.6162 1.6161 1.555 1.5550 0.0612 636.5 1.6092 1.6094 1.5496 1.5496 0.0596 829.3 1.6028 1.6027 1.5445 1.5445 0.0583 1062.6 1.5986 1.5986 1.5416 1.5416 0.0570

Additional Aspects

[0095] The following enumerated aspects are provided as non-limiting examples

[0096] A first aspect which is a device comprising a nonlinear optical (NLO) material according to the formula XLi.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

[0097] A second aspect which is the device of the first aspect, wherein X comprises potassium (K) and strontium (Sr).

[0098] A third aspect which is the device of the first aspect, wherein X comprises K.sub.3Sr.sub.3.

[0099] A fourth aspect which is the device of the first aspect, wherein X comprises rubidium (Rb) and barium (Ba).

[0100] A fifth aspect which is the device of the first aspect, wherein X comprises Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3.

[0101] A sixth aspect which is the device of any of the first through fifth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a walkoff of from about 1 mrad to about 200 mrad.

[0102] A seventh aspect which is the device of any of the first through sixth aspects, wherein the NLO forms single crystals with a minimum diameter of from about 2 mm to about 20 mm in at least two directions.

[0103] An eighth aspect which is the device of any of the first through seventh aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a second harmonic generation coefficient of greater than 0.39 pm/V.

[0104] A ninth aspect which is the device of any of the first through eighth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a band gap of greater than 6.2 eV.

[0105] A tenth aspect which is the device of any of the first through ninth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits an adsorption edge of less than 200 nm.

[0106] An eleventh aspect which is the device of any of the first through tenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a laser damage threshold of greater than 5.0 GW/cm.sup.2.

[0107] A twelfth aspect which is the device of any of the first through eleventh aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a bifringence at 1064 nm ranging from about 0.05 to about 0.09.

[0108] A thirteenth aspect which is a device comprising a nonlinear optical material (NLO) according to the formula KSrCO.sub.3F, wherein the NLO comprises at least one single crystal.

[0109] A fourteenth aspect which is the device of the thirteenth aspect, wherein the NLO exhibits a walkoff of from about 1 mrad to about 200 mrad.

[0110] A fifteenth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through fourteenth aspects, wherein the NLO forms single crystals with a minimum diameter of from about 2 mm to about 20 mm in at least two directions.

[0111] A sixteenth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through fifteenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a second harmonic generation coefficient of greater than 0.39 pm/V.

[0112] A seventeenth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through sixteenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a band gap of greater than 6.2 eV.

[0113] An eighteenth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through seventeenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits an adsorption edge of less than 200 nm.

[0114] A nineteenth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through eighteenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a laser damage threshold of greater than 5.0 GW/cm.sup.2.

[0115] A twentieth aspect which is the device of any of the thirteenth through nineteenth aspects, wherein the NLO exhibits a bifringence at 1064 nm ranging from about 0.05 to about 0.09.

[0116] A twenty-first aspect which is a nonlinear optical material selected from the group consisting of KSrCO.sub.3F Rb.sub.3Ba.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F and K.sub.3Sr.sub.3Li.sub.2Al.sub.4B.sub.6O.sub.20F.

[0117] A twenty-second aspect which is a device comprising the nonlinear optical material of the twenty-first aspect.

[0118] Exemplary aspects are disclosed and variations, combinations, and/or modifications of the aspect(s) and/or features of the aspect(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative aspects that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the aspect(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R.sub.l, and an upper limit, R.sub.u, is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=R.sub.l+k*(R.sub.u−R.sub.l), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent, . . . , 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent, . . . , 95 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed. Use of broader terms such as “comprises,” “includes,” and “having” should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as “consisting of,” “consisting essentially of,” and “comprised substantially of” Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is defined by the claims that follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.

[0119] While exemplary aspects of the invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or teachings herein. The aspects described herein are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications of the compositions, systems, apparatus, and processes described herein are possible and are within the scope of the invention that is claimed and thus defined below. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the aspects described herein, but is only limited by the claims that follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the steps in a method claim may be performed in any order and with any suitable combination of materials and processing conditions.