COMPRESSOR WITH THRUST CONTROL
20210270275 · 2021-09-02
Inventors
Cpc classification
F04D17/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04D29/051
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04D25/0606
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H02K7/14
ELECTRICITY
H02K2213/03
ELECTRICITY
H02K7/083
ELECTRICITY
F04D29/0516
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F04D25/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04D17/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04D29/051
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
An electric motor includes a stator and a rotator that is configured to rotate with respect to the stator. The stator has a length Ls and the rotor has a length Lr. The length Lr of the rotor is less than the length Ls of the stator such that the rotor does not overhang the stator. A compressor and a method of compressing a fluid are also disclosed.
Claims
1. An electric motor, comprising: a stator; and a rotor configured to rotate with respect to the stator, wherein the stator has a length L.sub.s and the rotor has a length L.sub.r, and wherein the length L.sub.r of the rotor is less than the length L.sub.s of the stator such that the rotor does not overhang the stator.
2. The electric motor of claim 1, wherein a difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length Ls of the stator is between about 1 and 5% of the length Lr of the rotor.
3. The electric motor of claim 2, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length Ls of the stator is between about 1 and 3% of the length Lr of the rotor.
4. The electric motor of claim 3, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is about 1.5% of the length L.sub.r of the rotor.
5. The electric motor of claim 1, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 2 and 5 times a predetermined manufacturing tolerance value for the length Lr of the rotor.
6. The electric motor of claim 5, wherein the difference between the length Lr of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 2 and 3 times the predetermined manufacturing tolerance value for the length L.sub.r of the rotor.
7. The electric motor of claim 1, wherein the electric motor is an electric motor in a compressor, and the electric motor is configured to drive at least one impeller via a shaft.
8. A compressor, comprising: an electric motor, including: a stator; and a rotor configured to rotate with respect to the stator, wherein the stator has a length L.sub.s and the rotor has a length L.sub.r, and wherein the length L.sub.r of the rotor is less than the length L.sub.s of the stator; at least one impeller configured to be driven by the electric motor via a shaft; and at least one bearing configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft.
9. The compressor of claim 8, wherein the compressor is a centrifugal compressor.
10. The compressor of claim 8, wherein the compressor is configured to compress a fluid, and the fluid is refrigerant.
11. The compressor of claim 8, wherein a difference between the length Lr of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 1 and 5% of the length L.sub.r of the rotor.
12. The compressor of claim 11, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 1 and 3% of the length Lr of the rotor.
13. The compressor of claim 12, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is about 1.5% of the length Lr of the rotor.
14. The compressor of claim 8, wherein the difference between the length Lr of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 2 and 5 times a predetermined manufacturing tolerance value for the length L.sub.r of the rotor.
15. The compressor of claim 14, wherein the difference between the length L.sub.r of the rotor and the length L.sub.s of the stator is between about 2 and 3 times the predetermined manufacturing tolerance value for the length L.sub.r of the rotor.
16. The compressor of claim 8, further comprising at least one balance piston configured to balance aerodynamic forces on the shaft, the aerodynamic forces generally aligned with an axis of the compressor.
17. The compressor of claim 16, wherein a sum of electromagnetic forces generated by the electric motor in a direction generally aligned with the axis are less than about 10% of the aerodynamic forces.
18. A method of compressing a fluid, comprising: rotating an impeller with an electric motor, the impeller configured to compress a fluid, the electric motor including: a stator; and a rotor configured to rotate with respect to the stator, wherein the stator has a length L.sub.s and the rotor has a length Lr, and wherein the length Lr of the rotor is less than the length L.sub.s of the stator when the rotor rotates.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein electric motor rotates the impeller via a shaft, and wherein at least one bearing facilitates rotation of the shaft.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the fluid is refrigerant.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024]
[0025]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] An example compressor 10 is schematically shown in
[0027] An electric motor 18 drives the impellers 16 via a shaft 20. Bearings 21 facilitate rotation of the shaft 20. In this example, the compressor 10 includes one shaft 20 that drives two impellers 16, each of which is associated with a suction port 12 and a discharge port 14, though other arrangements are contemplated.
[0028] The motor 18 includes a stator 22 and a rotor 24. As is generally known, the stator 22 remains stationary while the rotor 24 rotates due to electromagnetic forces generated by the interaction of the rotor 24 and stator 22. The rotor 24 rotates the shaft 20, which in turn rotates the impellers 16 as discussed above.
[0029] During operation of the compressor 10, axial forces, e.g., those generally aligned with an axis A of the compressor 10, are generated by aerodynamic forces and electromagnetic forces. These axial forces are represented by vectors which are additive and together can be characterized as a “net thrust” of the compressor 10. The axial forces can cause various components of the compressor 10 to be urged out of alignment with one another. This in turn can cause stress and wear on the bearings 21, especially where the fluid is a low viscosity fluid like refrigerant. Accordingly, reducing the axial forces (e.g., reducing “net thrust”) improves bearing 21 life, and in some cases, permits the use of smaller bearings 21.
[0030] The aerodynamic axial forces are generated by fluid travelling through the compressor 10 and being compressed. In one example, aerodynamic axial forces are managed or reduced by balance pistons 26 on the shaft 20. In the example of
[0031] The electromagnetic axial forces are generated by misalignment of the rotor 24 with respect to the stator 22. Misalignment can be caused by shifting of the rotor 24 and stator 22 during operation of the motor 18 and/or mismatch in rotor 24 and stator 22 sizes due to manufacturing tolerances. In particular, electromagnetic axial forces are increased when the rotor 24 overhangs the stator 22 on either side. That is, during operation, the rotor 24 may shift from being centered with respect to the stator 22 in either axial direction so that overhang occurs on one side of the rotor 24. The amount of overhang may additionally or alternatively be caused by mismatch in rotor 24 and stator 22 length due to manufacturing tolerances, e.g., where the rotor 24 is slightly longer than the stator 22.
[0032]
[0033] In a particular example, the difference Δ is between about 1 and 5% of the length Lr of the rotor 24. For instance, if the rotor 24 has a length of 10 inches (25.4 cm), the difference Δ is between about 0.1 inches (2.54 mm) and 0.5 inches (12.7 mm), and the length of the stator 22 is between about 9.9 inches (25.1 cm) and 9.5 inches (24.1 cm).
[0034] In a more particular example, the difference Δ is between about 1% and 3% of the length Lr of the rotor 24.
[0035] In a more particular example, the difference Δ is about 1.5% of the length Lr of the rotor 24.
[0036] In another example, the difference Δ is between about 2 and 5 times the manufacturing tolerance for the length of the rotor 24. The manufacturing tolerance for the length of the rotor 24 is a predetermined tolerance value. For instance, if the rotor 24 is manufactured with a specification that it must be within 0.1 inches (2.54 mm) of a desired length Lr of the rotor 24, the difference Δ is between about 0.2 (5.08 mm) and 0.3 inches (7.62 mm) in this example.
[0037] In a more particular example, the difference Δ is between about 2 and 3 times the manufacturing tolerance for the length of the rotor 24.
[0038] The compressor 10 having stator 22 and rotor 24 with a difference Δ in their respective lengths as discussed above results in lower electromagnetic axial forces because the difference Δ ensures that the rotor 24 does not overhang the stator 22. As a result, the bearing 21 experiences less stress and wear. Therefore, the bearing 21 lifetime is improved, and in some cases, a smaller bearing 21 can be used.
[0039] In one example, the compressor 10 having stators 22 and rotors 24 with a difference Δ in their respective lengths as discussed above results in electromagnetic axial forces that are about 10% or less of the aerodynamic axial forces discussed above.
[0040] The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure. The scope of legal protection given to this disclosure can only be determined by studying the following claims.