Reagent and kit for enhancing chemiluminescent reaction

Abstract

A reagent for enhancing a chemiluminescent reaction includes luminol or luminol derivatives, an oxidant, an electron mediator, and an enhancer. The enhancer is a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms. The present disclosure further provides a kit for enhancing a chemiluminescent reaction comprising the foregoing reagent.

Claims

1. A reagent for enhancing a chemiluminescent reaction, comprising: luminol or luminol derivatives; an oxidant; an electron mediator; and an enhancer, which is a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms and is a compound selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00010##

2. The reagent according to claim 1, wherein the oxidant is sodium perborate or hydrogen peroxide, and the electron mediator is p-iodophenol, p-iodophenylboronic acid, sodium 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl) propane-1-sulfonate, or sodium 4-(phenothiazin-10-yl) butane-1-sulfonate.

3. The reagent according to claim 2, wherein the oxidant is sodium perborate, and the electron mediator is sodium 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl) propane-1-sulfonate.

4. The reagent according to claim 1, wherein the enhancer is a compound selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00011##

5. The reagent according to claim 1, wherein the enhancer is: ##STR00012##

6. The reagent according to claim 1, wherein the reagent has a pH ranging from 7.0 to 10.0.

7. The reagent according to claim 6, wherein the reagent has a pH ranging from 7.5 to 9.0.

8. A kit for enhancing a chemiluminescent reaction, comprising a first vial, a second vial, and the reagent according to claim 1, wherein the luminol or luminol derivatives is present in the first vial, the oxidant is present in the second vial, and the electron mediator and the enhancer are present either in the first vial or in the second vial or in both vials.

9. The kit according to claim 8, further comprising a peroxidase.

10. The kit according to claim 9, wherein the peroxidase is horseradish peroxidase, soybean peroxidase, or sweet potato peroxidase.

11. The kit according to claim 8, wherein the oxidant of the reagent is sodium perborate or hydrogen peroxide, and the electron mediator of the reagent is p-iodophenol, p-iodophenylboronic acid, sodium 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl) propane-1-sulfonate, or sodium 4-(phenothiazin-10-yl) butane-1-sulfonate.

12. The kit according to claim 8, wherein the oxidant of the reagent is sodium perborate, and the electron mediator of the reagent is sodium 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl) propane-1-sulfonate.

13. The kit according to claim 8, wherein the enhancer of the reagent is a compound selected from the group consisting of: ##STR00013##

14. The kit according to claim 13, wherein the enhancer of the reagent is ##STR00014##

15. The kit according to claim 8, wherein the reagent has a pH ranging from 7.0 to 10.0.

16. The kit according to claim 15, wherein the reagent has a pH ranging from 7.5 to 9.0.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a plot of luminescence intensity versus time for luminol chemiluminescent reactions carried out in the presence of the reagent of the present disclosure and commercially available reagents.

(2) FIG. 2 shows a plot of luminescence intensity versus pH of the reagent of the present disclosure for luminol chemiluminescent reaction carried out in the presence of the reagent of the present disclosure and a commercial reagent.

(3) FIG. 3 shows a plot of luminescence intensity versus concentration of enhancer for luminol chemiluminescent reaction carried out in the presence of the reagent of the present disclosure and a commercial reagent.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(4) To make the present disclosure more comprehensible, the present disclosure will be described in further detail below by way of examples in conjunction with the drawings. It is to be understood that the following examples are merely illustrative of the present disclosure and are not intended to limit the present disclosure.

(5) The present disclosure provides a reagent for enhancing a chemiluminescent reaction, which comprises a luminol or luminol derivatives, an oxidant, an electron mediator, and an enhancer. The enhancer is a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms, and is a compound selected from:

(6) ##STR00007##

(7) Preferably, the enhancer is a compound selected from:

(8) ##STR00008##

(9) In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the enhancer is preferably

(10) ##STR00009##
and the enhancer may have a concentration of 1.0 mM to 25.0 mM, and preferably 1.0 mM to 10.0 mM.

(11) In the reagent of the present disclosure, luminol or luminol derivatives used must be of purity suitable and appropriate for luminescence assays. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, luminol or luminol derivatives may be used as sodium salt. The concentration of luminol or luminol derivatives in the reagent of the present disclosure may be between 0.5 mM to 10.0 mM, preferably between 0.5 mM and 1.0 mM, and more preferably 1.0 mM.

(12) In the reagent of the present disclosure, the oxidant may be any substance capable of oxidizing luminol or luminol derivatives to produce light. For example, the oxidant may be sodium perborate or hydrogen peroxide, and in one embodiment of the present disclosure is, but not limited to, sodium perborate. The concentration of the oxidant in the reagent of the present disclosure may be between 0.5 mM to 10.0 mM, preferably between 2.0 mM and 4.0 mM, and more preferably 4.0 mM.

(13) In the reagent of the present disclosure, the electron mediator may be any electroactive substance able to act as electron mediator between the oxidant and the luminol or luminol derivatives. For example, the electron mediator may be benzothiazolea, phenols, aromatic amines, N-alkyl phenothiazinea, indophenols, or arylboronic acids. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the preferred electron mediators are p-iodophenol, p-iodophenylboronic acid, 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl)propane-1-sulfonate, or 4-(phenothiazine-10-yl)butane-1-sulfonate, and preferably is, but not limited to, sodium 3-(phenothiazin-10-yl) propane-1-sulfonate. The concentration of the electron mediator in the reagent of the present disclosure may be between 0.5 mM and 10.0 mM, preferably between 0.5 mM and 5.0 mM, and more preferably 5.0 mM. Additionally, the electron mediator must not contain impurities that can inhibit the chemiluminescent reaction.

(14) In practical use, the reagent of the present disclosure may be prepared in a kit form to be conveniently used in chemical detection, biological detection, immunoassays, etc. utilizing chemiluminescence as a detection means, such as dot blot, Western blot, Southern blot, Northern blot, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Specifically, luminol or luminol derivatives and the oxidant are preferably formulated respectively as separate solutions, for example a luminescent solution containing luminol or luminol derivatives and an oxidizing solution containing the oxidant, so as to extend the shelf life.

(15) The electron mediator, the enhancer, and other additives such as a stabilizer may be added to either the luminescent solution or the oxidizing solution, or to both of the two solutions. Both the luminescent solution and the oxidizing solution contain a buffering substance. The buffering substance may be any buffer solution commonly used in the art, such as Tris-HCl buffer solution, phosphate buffer solution, acetate buffer solution, and the like.

(16) In one embodiment of the present disclosure, both the electron mediator and the enhancer are added to the luminescent solution, but not limited thereto; and the buffering substance in the luminescent solution is Tris-HCl buffer solution, and the buffering substance in the oxidizing solution is acetate buffer solution.

(17) When the reagent of the present disclosure is practically used in a chemiluminescent reaction, for example, a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay, the luminescent solution is mixed with the oxidizing solution, and a peroxidase is used as a label. The pH of the reagent after the luminescent solution is mixed with the oxidizing solution is between about 8.0 to 9.0. The peroxidase may be any peroxidase suitable for use in luminescence assays. In particular, it may be horseradish peroxidase (HRP), for example Sigma type VI A or IX, or an anionic peroxidase such as soybean peroxidase or sweet potato peroxidase. The peroxidase may be free or conjugated to a ligand, a biopolymer, or a solid phase. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the horseradish peroxidase Sigma type VI A is used, but not limited thereto.

(18) To make those skilled in the art to fully understand the present disclosure, the present disclosure is now described in more detail below with reference to the following examples and the drawings, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

EXAMPLE 1

Effect of Enhancer on Chemiluminescent Emission of Luminol

(19) Luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were respectively prepared according to the composition shown in the following Table 1.

(20) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Concentra- Composition tion (mM) Luminescent luminol sodium salt 2.0 solution SPTZ 10.0 Enhancer 6-chloropurine 10.0 2,6-dichloropurine 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 9.0 300.0 Oxidizing sodium perborate 8.0 solution sodium acetate buffer solution, pH 5.0 50.0 The prepared luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were stored in a refrigerator at 4° C.

(21) The reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and the Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were prepared respectively as follows.

(22) Reagents of Experimental Examples: A plurality of reagents were prepared by mixing equal parts of the luminescent solutions and the oxidizing solutions shown in Table 1. The pH values of the reagents after mixing were respectively 8.0 to 9.0. The enhancers used in Experimental Examples 1 to 3 were respectively 6-chloropurine, 2,6-dichloropurine, and 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]Pyridine.

(23) Reagent of Comparative Example 1: The reagent was prepared in substantially the same manner as in the foregoing Experimental Examples, except that no enhancer is contained.

(24) Reagent of Comparative Example 2: A commercially available luminescent reagent (SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate, available from Thermo Fisher Scientific).

(25) Reagent of Comparative Example 3: A commercially available luminescent reagent (Immobilon™ Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate, available from Merck Millipore).

(26) A disposable polystyrene black 96-well microplate (supplied by PerkinElmer) is prepared. 180 μL of the reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and of the reagents of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were respectively added to each well of the microplate, and then 20 μL of a 10 ng/mL horseradish peroxidase solution (HRP type VI A) was added to each well. The luminescence intensity of the reaction product, 3-aminophthalic acid dianion in the excited state, was recorded every minute for 1 hour by a multifunctional microplate reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, available from BioTek, where a chemiluminescence mode was set, and the detection parameter Gain was set to 130). The results are shown in FIG. 1.

(27) As can be seen from FIG. 1, in comparison with using the reagent of Comparative Example 1 containing no enhancer, the luminescence intensity of luminol chemiluminescent reaction can be effectively enhanced when using the reagent of Experimental Examples 1 to 3, which respectively comprises a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms as the enhancer. In addition, compared with using the commercially available luminescent agent of Comparative Example 2, the luminescence intensity of luminol chemiluminescent reaction, when using the reagent of Experimental Examples 1 to 3, can be maintained over 60 minutes, whereas the luminescence intensity of luminol chemiluminescent reaction when using the commercially available luminescent agent is significantly decreased with time. Furthermore, in comparison with using the reagent of Comparative Example 3, both the luminescence intensity and stability of luminol chemiluminescent reaction, when using the reagent of Experimental Example 1, can be effectively enhanced and improved.

EXAMPLE 2

Effect of pH of the Reagent on Chemiluminescent Emission of Luminol

(28) Luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were respectively prepared according to the composition shown in the following Table 2.

(29) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Concentra- Composition tion (mM) Luminescent luminol sodium salt 2.0 solution SPTZ 10.0 Enhancer 6-chloropurine 10.0 2,6-dichloropurine 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 7.0 to 10.0 300.0 Oxidizing sodium perborate 8.0 solution ultrapure water — The prepared luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were stored in a refrigerator at 4° C.

(30) The reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and the Comparative Example 1 were prepared respectively as follows.

(31) Reagents of Experimental Examples: A plurality of reagents were prepared by mixing equal parts of the luminescent solutions and the oxidizing solutions shown in Table 2. The pH values of the reagents after mixing were respectively 7.0 to 10.0. The enhancers used in Experimental Examples 1 to 3 were respectively 6-chloropurine, 2,6-dichloropurine, and 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]Pyridine.

(32) Reagent of Comparative Example 1: The reagent was prepared in substantially the same manner as in the foregoing Experimental Examples, except that no enhancer is contained.

(33) A disposable polystyrene black 96-well microplate (supplied by PerkinElmer) is prepared. 180 μL of the reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and of the reagent of Comparative Example 1 were respectively added to each well of the microplate, and then 20 μL of a 10 ng/mL horseradish peroxidase solution (HRP type VI A) was added to each well. The luminescence intensity of the reaction product, 3-aminophthalic acid dianion in the excited state, was recorded every minute for 1 hour by a multifunctional microplate reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, available from BioTek, where a chemiluminescence mode was set, and the detection parameter Gain was set to 130). The determined luminescence intensities were accumulated and the results of accumulated luminescence intensities versus the pHs of the reagents are shown in FIG. 2.

(34) As can be seen from FIG. 2, in comparison with using the reagent of Comparative Example 1 containing no enhancer, the luminescence intensity of luminol chemiluminescent reaction can be effectively enhanced when using the reagent of Experimental Examples 1 to 3, which respectively comprises a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms as the enhancer. In the reagent of Experimental Example 1, which uses 6-chloropurine as the enhancer, the luminescence intensity thereof can be effectively enhanced at a pH of the reagent ranging from 7.0 to 10.0. In the reagents of Experimental Examples 2 and 3, which respectively uses 2,6-dichloropurine and 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine as the enhancer, the luminescence intensities thereof can be effectively enhanced at a pH of the reagents ranging from 7.5 to 9.0. In particular, the luminescent intensity can be significantly enhanced at a pH of the reagent ranging from 7.5 to 9.0.

EXAMPLE 3

Effect of Enhancer Concentration on Chemiluminescent Emission of Luminol

(35) Luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were respectively prepared according to the composition shown in the following Table 3.

(36) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Concentra- Composition tion (mM) Luminescent luminol sodium salt 2.0 solution SPTZ 10.0 Enhancer 6-chloropurine 2.0, 6.0, 2,6-dichloropurine 10.0, 20.0, 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine 50.0 Tris-HCl buffer solution, pH 9.0 300.0 Oxidizing sodium perborate 8.0 solution sodium acetate buffer solution, pH 5.0 50.0 The prepared luminescent solutions and oxidizing solutions were stored in a refrigerator at 4° C.

(37) The reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and the Comparative Example 1 were prepared respectively as follows.

(38) Reagents of Experimental Examples: A plurality of reagents were prepared by mixing equal parts of the luminescent solutions and the oxidizing solutions shown in Table 3. The pH values of the reagents after mixing were respectively 8.0 to 9.0 and the concentrations of the enhancers contained in the reagents were respectively 1.0 mM, 3.0 mM, 5.0 mM, 10.0 mM, and 25.0 mM. The enhancers used in Experimental Examples 1 to 3 were respectively 6-chloropurine, 2,6-dichloropurine, and 6-chloroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine.

(39) Reagent of Comparative Example 1: The reagent was prepared in substantially the same manner as in the foregoing Experimental Examples, except that no enhancer is contained.

(40) A disposable polystyrene black 96-well microplate (supplied by PerkinElmer) is prepared. 180 μL of the reagents of Experimental Examples 1 to 3 and of the reagent of Comparative Example 1 were respectively added to each well of the microplate, and then 20 μL of a 10 ng/mL horseradish peroxidase solution (HRP type VI A) was added to each well. The luminescence intensity of the reaction product, 3-aminophthalic acid dianion in the excited state, was recorded every minute for 1 hour by a multifunctional microplate reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, available from BioTek, where a chemiluminescence mode was set, and the detection parameter Gain was set to 130). The determined luminescence intensities were accumulated and the results of accumulated luminescence intensities versus the concentrations of the enhancers are shown in FIG. 3.

(41) As can be seen from FIG. 3, in comparison with the reagent of Comparative Example 1 containing no enhancer, the luminescence intensity of luminol chemiluminescent reaction can be effectively enhanced when using the reagent of Experimental Examples 1 to 3, which respectively comprises a nitrogen-containing fused heterocyclic compound having at least two nitrogen atoms as an enhancer. The luminescence intensity can be enhanced at a concentration of the enhancer ranging from 1.0 mM to 25.0 mM. In particular, the luminescent intensity can be significantly enhanced at a concentration of the enhancer ranging from 1.0 mM to 10.0 mM.

(42) The above results confirm that the reagent of the present disclosure can not only significantly enhance the luminescence intensity in the chemiluminescent reaction, but also increase the luminescence time as well as improve the stability of luminescence intensity. Therefore, the reagent of the present disclosure is advantageous in terms of chemical detection, biological detection, immunoassays, etc. utilizing chemiluminescence as a detection means, and the sensitivity and stability of the chemiluminescence detection technique can be effectively improved.