METHOD FOR INSPECTING A WELD

Abstract

A method for inspecting a weld of plastic pipes by means of a data processing device, comprising: capturing and storing documents; monitoring and recording the installation and the implementation of the weld of the joint; producing a welding report, or adopting a welding report from the welding machine; testing the weld ultrasonically, wherein the test detects and stores the defects that are in the weld; wherein software is used to capture and store the documents, the welding report and the defects, more specifically the data on said defects, wherein an algorithm of the software is used to evaluate the stored documents, reports, defects and data on said defects, and to classify the welded joint as compliant or non-compliant with the requirements.

Claims

1. A method for inspecting a weld of plastic pipes by means of a data processing device, comprising: capturing and storing documents; monitoring and recording the installation and the implementation of the weld of the joint; producing a welding report, or adopting a welding report from the welding machine; testing the weld ultrasonically, wherein the test detects and stores the defects that are in the weld; wherein software stored in a non-volatile memory is used to capture and store the documents, the welding report and the defects, more specifically the data on said defects, wherein an algorithm of the software is used to evaluate the stored documents, reports, defects and data on said defects, and to classify the welded joint as compliant or non-compliant with the requirements.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method can be applied to butt-fusion welds and electrofusion-coupler welds.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the installation is specified step by step, and is monitored and recorded step by step.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the algorithm includes the following steps: adopting an initial value based on the components to be welded; calculating a value based on the detected and stored defects; subtracting the calculated value for the defects from the initial value; checking whether the difference value obtained lies above or below a defined threshold value, on the basis of which the weld is deemed to be admissible or inadmissible.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the defects are calculated on the basis of their dimension.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the width, length and/or depth of the defects is detected and evaluated for the purpose of calculating the defects.

7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the software is formed by an app.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] An exemplary embodiment of the invention is described with reference to the FIGURES, in which the invention is not limited solely to the exemplary embodiment; in which:

[0026] FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of the method according to the invention and the documents and steps contained therein.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0027] The drawing presented in FIG. 1 shows all the data and documentation that the method according to the invention needs to assess whether a welded joint is admissible. FIG. 1 shows a few preferred documents 1 that the software and data processing device capture for the method. It is obviously possible to define precisely in the software which documents are mandatory for the assessment and which are optional. These documents are then captured and stored. The storage can take place in the data processing device and also on an external server or in a Cloud. The installation process 2 of the pipes and/or fittings is then monitored by an image, for instance, and the position or coordinates of the weld are recorded. This is also again entered and managed by means of the software. In addition, the data from the ultrasonic welding is captured 3, wherein the welding device transmits the data to the software of the method according to the invention or to the data processing device, and a welding report 3 is produced using the software, or the welding report 3 is already produced by the welding machine and is transmitted to the software. The weld is then tested ultrasonically 4, wherein the test provides information about defects in the weld. An algorithm 5 (flow diagram is a purely notional representation) saved in the software and the captured data and documents are used to produce a report 5, which indicates whether the weld is admissible or inadmissible, preferably on the basis of the welded-joint quality.