METHOD FOR OPERATING A RADAR SENSOR SYSTEM IN A MOTOR VEHICLE

Abstract

A method for operating a radar sensor system including multiple radar sensors operating independently of one another in a motor vehicle, wherein the radar sensors are synchronized with one another with respect to their transmission times and transmission frequencies in such a way that two radar signals whose frequency separation is smaller than a certain minimum frequency separation are at no point in time transmitted simultaneously.

Claims

1-6. (canceled)

7. A method for operating a radar sensor system including multiple radar sensors operating independently of one another in a motor vehicle, the method comprising the following step: synchronizing the radar sensors with one another with respect to their transmission times and transmission frequencies in such a way that two radar signals whose frequency separation is smaller than a certain minimum frequency separation are at no point in time transmitted simultaneously.

8. The method as recited in claim 7, further comprising the following step: providing a shared clock signal to the radar sensors, the radar sensors being synchronized with one another based on the shared clock signal.

9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein a bus system present in the motor vehicle is used to provide the shared clock signal to the radar sensors.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the shared clock signal in each of the radar sensors is constructed based on data traffic taking place on the bus system.

11. A radar sensor system, comprising: multiple radar sensors operating independently of one another in a motor vehicle; wherein the system is configured to synchronize the radar sensors with one another with respect to their transmission times and transmission frequencies in such a way that two radar signals whose frequency separation is smaller than a certain minimum frequency separation are at no point in time transmitted simultaneously.

12. The radar system as recited in claim 11, wherein each of the radar sensors includes at least one transmission oscillator configure to generate a radar signal to be transmitted, a controller configured to activate the transmission oscillator, and a local base oscillator configured provide a local time and a frequency reference for the radar sensor, each of the radar sensors further including a frequency comparator configured to compare a local clock signal generated by the local base oscillator to the shared clock signal and, in the event of a frequency deviation, to report a deviation signal to the controller.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0012] FIG. 1 shows an outline of a radar system including multiple radar sensors in a motor vehicle.

[0013] FIG. 2 shows a simplified circuit diagram of two radar sensors, which are synchronized with one another via a bus, in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention.

[0014] FIG. 3 shows a time diagram of clock signals for the synchronization of the radar sensors in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention

[0015] FIG. 4 shows different frequency modulation patterns of the radar signals transmitted by two radar sensors in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

[0016] FIG. 1 schematically shows a layout of a motor vehicle 10 in which a total of five radar sensors 12, 14 operating independently of one another are installed. Radar sensor 12 is situated centrally in the front bumper of the vehicle and is used to measure the distances and relative speeds of preceding vehicles. The four radar sensors 14 are situated in the four corners of the vehicle and are used, for example, to detect pedestrians next to the vehicle's own lane, to detect passing vehicles on the adjoining lanes and the like. The radar sensor operate independently of one another in the sense that each radar sensor supplies measuring data about the objects located by it, without requiring any pieces of information from one of the other radar sensors to do so.

[0017] The vehicle includes a bus system 16, for example a CAN bus system, via which different sensor and actuator components and electronic control entities of the vehicle communicate with one another. Radar sensors 12, 14 are also connected to the bus system and communicate via this bus system, among other things, with a driver assistance system in which the positioning data are further evaluated.

[0018] In the example shown here, bus system 16 is also used to provide radar sensors 12, 14 with a shared clock signal, which allows radar sensors 12, 14 to be precisely synchronized with one another.

[0019] FIG. 2 schematically shows two of radar sensors 14, which receive a shared clock signal T via bus system 16. Clock signal T may be made up of a continuous or intermittent sequence of rectangular pulses having a fixed clock frequency, as shown in FIG. 3. Each radar sensor includes a local base oscillator 18, which generates a local clock signal L1 and L2, which determines the local time in the particular radar sensor and also serves as a reference for the frequency of a radar signal generated by a local transmission oscillator 20. In the shown example, each radar sensor includes only a single transmission oscillator 20, but optionally it is also possible for multiple transmission oscillators to be present in the same radar sensor.

[0020] The frequency of shared clock signal T is compared to local clock signal L1 and L2 by a frequency comparator 22. In the event of a frequency deviation, frequency comparator 22 reports a deviation signal D to a controller 24, which activates transmission oscillator 20 and determines the frequency modulation of the radar signal, which is then emitted via an antenna 26.

[0021] As is shown in FIG. 3, frequency comparator 22 of each radar sensor to be synchronized counts a certain number of pulses of clock signal T. The counting in each case covers a time interval 28, whose duration is determined by the number of the counted pulses and by the frequency of clock signal T. In the simplified example shown here, only sixteen pulses of clock signal T are counted. In practice, however, the number of the counted pulses is considerably larger and is, for example, in the order of magnitude of a million.

[0022] Within the same time interval 28, the pulses of local clock signal L1 and L2 are also counted in each case. In the shown example, local clock signal L1 has the same frequency as shared clock signal T, i.e., sixteen pulses of clock signal L1 are also counted in time interval 28. The base oscillator generating clock signal L2, in contrast, has a slightly smaller frequency, so that only fifteen pulses are counted here in time interval 28. Based on the difference between the setpoint number of the pulses (sixteen in this example) and the actually counted number (fifteen in this example), the frequency deviation of the particular base oscillator may be ascertained, which is then reported as deviation signal D to controller 24.

[0023] It is not mandatory, of course, that the base oscillators 22 have the same frequency as clock signal T. It suffices that a certain setpoint ratio exists between these clock signals.

[0024] If, as is the case with local clock signal L2 here, a frequency deviation is established, controller 24 may correct the local time in the particular radar sensor based on deviation signal D. Based on deviation signal D, it is also possible to calibrate the frequency generated by transmission oscillator 20 to the frequency of clock signal T.

[0025] If, in this way, the local times and the transmission frequencies in all radar sensors are synchronized with clock signal T, a synchronization of the local times and frequencies of the radar sensors among one another is also achieved, without having to have precise knowledge of the absolute value of the frequency of shared clock signal T to do so. For this reason, clock signal T may be derived from any arbitrary signal which is available on bus system 16 and has a sufficiently stable frequency.

[0026] FIG. 4 shows, as simplified examples, two different frequency modulation patterns M1 and M2 (frequency f as a function of time t), which may be, for example, the transmission frequencies of transmission oscillators 20 of the two radar sensors shown in FIG. 2. As an example, it is assumed here that frequency modulation pattern M1 is made up of intermittently transmitted sequences of rising frequency ramps, while frequency modulation pattern M2 is made up of an alternating sequence of rising and falling ramps. Due to the synchronization via shared clock signal T, the frequencies in the two modulation patterns may be adjusted in such a way that, at any point in time, the ratio and thus also the frequency separation of the transmission frequencies are precisely known, regardless of potential frequency deviations between local clock signals L1 and L2. Since the local times in the radar sensors are also synchronized with one another, the modulation patterns in this example may also be synchronized with one another in such a way that the frequency minima of M2 in each case are in the pauses between the individual bursts of modulation pattern M1, as is shown in FIG. 4. In this way, it is possible to ensure with high precision that the frequency separation between the signals transmitted by the two radar sensors is not smaller, at any point in time, than a certain minimum frequency separation f_.sub.min. By appropriately selecting this minimum frequency separation f_.sub.min, taking the reception bandwidth of the sensors into consideration, it is then possible to ensure that the measuring data received with radar sensors 12, 14 of the system shown in FIG. 1 are not distorted by disruptive interferences when, for whatever reason, signals are received in any one of these radar sensors which are made up of a superposition of two or multiple of the signals transmitted by radar sensors 12, 14.