Measurement of positions, mechanical displacements and rotations and stresses of bodies
20210055359 ยท 2021-02-25
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01D5/165
PHYSICS
G01D5/145
PHYSICS
G01B7/30
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
The invention concerns a device and a method for measuring the relative position and angles between two bodies to be measured (7, 77). The invention is characterized in that it comprises one or more permanent magnets (6) and in that the position to be measured is determined indirectly via a magnetic field. The magnetic field is detected by one or more magnetic field sensors (3) read by a microchip. A mathematical minimization method is used to calculate back to the position and angles of the permanent magnet system (6) in relation to the magnetic field sensors (3). The energy required to read out the sensors can be obtained from the excitation field of a readout device. The sensor can perform without energy supply and can be read out by means of standard readout devices, such as an NFC-capable mobile telephone.
Claims
1. Method for measuring the distance between two bodies (7, 77), characterized in that at least two magnetic field sensor (3) are mounted on one body (77) and at least one permanent magnet (6) is mounted on another body (7), and at least one component of the magnetic field of at least two sensors (3) are measured (H.sub.measurement) and a magnetic field H.sub.theory is calculated, which is generated by the permanent magnet system (6) for a given alignment y.sub.magnet that is comprised that the difference d between the theoretical field H.sub.theory and the measured field H.sub.measurement is determined d(y.sub.magnet)=H.sub.theory(y.sub.magnet)H.sub.measurement and the alignment y.sub.magnet of the permanent magnet system (6) is determined in such a way that the mathematical norm of the vector d is minimized and thus the alignment y.sub.magnet of the magnetic system (6) relative to the field sensors (3) is determined.
2. Method for measuring the alignment y.sub.magnet between two bodies (7, 77), characterized in that at least two magnetic field sensors (3) are mounted on one body (77) and a magnet system consisting of at least one permanent magnet (6) is mounted on another body (7) and the permanent magnets at the positions of the sensors generating a magnetic field H.sub.measurement and at least one component of the magnetic field of at least two sensors (3) is measured, characterized in that the orientation of the magnet system y.sub.magnet is determined by first training a machine learning method where for a plurality of alignments y.sub.magnet of the permanent magnet system (6) the expected magnetic field H.sub.theory(y.sub.magnet) is determined at the locations of the sensors and used as training data for the machine learning method and hence the machine learning method can predict for a certain measured field H.sub.measurement an approximation of y.sub.magnet.
3. Method according to claim 1, wherein the starting value of the alignment of the magnet system y.sub.magnet,0 is determined from the method according to claim 2.
4. Method according to claim 1, wherein the alignment of the magnet system y.sub.Magnet only includes the local displacements in space, thus y.sub.magnet=x.sub.magnet.
5. Method according to claim 1, wherein the distance between two bodies (7, 77) is determined from the orientation of the magnet system y.sub.magnet.
6. Method according to claim 1, wherein a soft magnetic shield is mounted between the permanent magnets (6) and the body (7).
7. Method according to claim 2, wherein a soft magnetic shield is mounted between the permanent magnets (6) and the body (7).
8. Method according to claim 1, wherein the theoretical field is scaled with a factor , and this factor is determined in minimizing the distance d.
9. Method according to claim 1, wherein at least one permanent magnet has a non-parallel magnetization with respect to one of the other permanent magnets.
10. Method according to claim 1 wherein the magnetization of a permanent magnet consists of a pseudo-random code.
11. Method according to claim 2 wherein the magnetization of a permanent magnet consists of a pseudo-random code.
12. Method according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the methods is used such as neural networks, gradient boost or regression.
13. Method according to claim 2, wherein for a plurality of alignments y.sub.magnet, the machine learning method is training with expected magnetic fields H.sub.theory(y.sub.magnet) that are determined by physically changing the orientation of the magnetic field system (6) relative to the sensor array (3) and for the known vector y.sub.magnet the values H.sub.theory(y.sub.magnet) are determined by reading out the magnetic field sensors (3).
14. Method according to claim 1, wherein the expected magnetic fields H.sub.theory(y.sub.magnet) at the locations of the sensors are determined by an analytical or numerical calculation of the magnetic field.
15. Method according to claim 2, wherein values from methods of claim 13 are also used in the training of the machine learning method.
16. Device for measuring the distance between two bodies (7, 77), characterized in that at least two magnetic field sensors (3) are mounted on one body (77) and at least two permanent magnets (6) are mounted on another body (7), and this permanent magnet system thus generates a magnetic field which has no rotational symmetry, at least two components of the magnetic field are measured by the magnetic field sensors (3), and based on the measured magnetic field the alignment of body (7) relative to body (77) is determined.
17. Device according to claim 16, wherein the energy used for reading the magnetic field sensors (3) is obtained from the electromagnetic field of a readout device.
18. Device according to claim 16, wherein the magnetization direction of the permanent magnets describes a pseudo random code.
19. Device according to claim 16, wherein at least one permanent magnet (6) has a non-collinear magnetization with respect to one of the other permanent magnets.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
[0036] The invention is explained in more detail below on the basis of the drawing. Thereby shows, or rather show, quite schematically:
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
[0057]
[0058] One or more permanent magnets (6) are mounted in a holder (11) on the body (7) to be measured. The magnetic field sensors (3) and the microchip (4) are placed together in a housing (12) and are mounted on the same body (7), or on a mechanically separated body (77).
[0059] The permanent magnets can be glued or screwed directly to a housing or integrated directly into the body to be measured.
[0060] Due to the use of several magnetic field sensors (3), external disturbing influences such as the earth's magnetic field or temperatures can be compensated. To further compensate the influence of temperature on the sensor signal, a micro-chip (4) with an internal or external temperature sensor can be used. By knowing the current temperature, the temperature-dependent measured resistance value of the magnetic field sensor can be compensated.
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065] Other magnetic configurations of permanent magnets can consist of a pseudo random code (PRC) of the permanent magnet. A pseudo random code arranged along one track overlaps so that the first (N1) bits of the current code are identical to the last (N1) bits of the previous code. Any N bit long code, i.e. positions, can be determined by scanning the pseudo random code using a window containing N bits.
[0066] For example, the permanent magnets are arranged with the north pole up (z direction) or down (z direction) according to a PRC, as shown in
[0067] Thus the coding is unique at each position p.sub.i. If the magnetic field resulting from this encoding is read out with the magnetic field sensors (3), it is possible to deduce the position p.sub.i, as well as through the previously described algorithms within the positions p.sub.i with even higher accuracy relative to the permanent magnets (6). In other words, in a first step the rough position can be determined on the basis of the unique bit pattern of the pseudo random code and in a second step a subbinary resolution can be achieved with the algorithm described above.
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076] These changes describe elongation of the material of which the body is made, which is caused by stress, temperature or aging.
[0077] Instead of a permanent magnet (2), for example, electromagnets can also be used.
[0078] The respective actual arrangement of the various magnetic field sensors (3) and permanent magnet system (6) may differ from those shown. For example, the permanent magnet system (6), magnetic field sensor (3), microchip (4) and antenna (9) can be interchanged. The casing (11, 12) in which the permanent magnet (6) or other components (3, 4, 6, 9, 10) are embedded can be made of a wide variety of materials. Plastics such as thermoplastics, duroplastics, elastomers are particularly preferred. For high temperature applications, refractory ceramics such as compounds of silicate raw materials, compounds based on magnesite, SiOxides-, aluminium oxide, silicon carbide, boron nitride, zirconium oxide, silicon nitride, aluminium nitride, tungsten carbide and aluminium titanate can-be used.
[0079] As magnetic field sensors Hall sensors, AMR, sensors, GMR sensors and TMR sensors, magnetoimpetance sensors or squid sensors can be used. For TMR and GMR sensors, sensors that show a vortex state in the free magnetic layer are particularly suitable (US20150185297A1).
[0080] Magnetic materials for the permanent magnets can be sintered magnets, polymer-bound magnets or magnets produced by additive manufacturing (Huber, C., et al. Applied Physics Letters 109.16 (2016): 162401). Examples of hard magnetic materials are rare earth magnets (NdFeB,SmFeB), magnetic ferrites (SrFe,BaFe), Alnico magnets.
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084] In
[0085] Possible geometries and arrangements of the magnets and sensors are for example those where the smallest lateral extension of at least one permanent magnet is greater than 0.2 times the average distance of the sensors (3) and the distance between the centres of the magnets is greater than 0.2 times the average distance of the sensors. Due to the high field gradients, such arrangements lead to an accurate determination of the alignment in space.
[0086] In
[0087] Different combinations of the elements shown and described are also possible and, of course, in the future new materials with the above-mentioned properties can be used, even if their names do not correspond to those currently used. The reason for this explicit statement is that especially the material sciences are in rapid development and no restriction of protection should be derived from this.