Composites for extraction of metal or contaminating chemical species
11857945 ยท 2024-01-02
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C02F2101/22
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D2253/204
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/265
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/64
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/226
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F1/288
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D2253/25
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2257/708
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J20/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D53/64
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Disclosed is the use of a composite for extracting one or more metal or contaminating chemical species from an aerial or aqueous medium by selective binding, the composite including at least one porous template functionalized by at least one polymer, the polymer including one of the following chemical functions: primary, secondary or tertiary amine, amide, nitrile, pyridine, pyrole, thiol, thiolether, thiophene, thiadiazole, alcohol/hydroxyl, phenol, catechol, pyragalol, carboxylic acid, aldehyde, ester, acyl, crown ether, phosphate, phosphoryl, epoxide, halogen, haloalkane.
Claims
1. A method for extraction of compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid from an aerial or aqueous medium by selective binding, said method comprising: providing an aerial or aqueous medium comprising compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid; exposing said aerial or aqueous medium to a composite, said composite comprising at least one porous template functionalized by at least one polymer, said polymer comprising one of the following chemical functions: primary, secondary or tertiary amine, amide, nitrile, pyridine, pyrrole, thiol, thiolether, thiophene, thiadiazole, alcohol/hydroxyl, phenol, catechol, pyragallol, carboxylic acid, aldehyde, ester, acyl, crown ether, phosphate, phosphoryl, epoxide, halogen, haloalkane; during said exposure, allowing the compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid to bind to the composite.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one polymer is chosen among redox active polymers, peptides, biopolymer comprising polypeptides and polysaccharides, epoxy based polymer, fluoropolymer, acrylics, dedrimers, rubbers, inorganic polymers and organic polymers.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein said at least one polymer is chosen among redox active polymers.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein said redox active polymer is chosen among Poly(Tetracyanoquinodimethane) (PTCNQ), Poly(Viologens) Poly(Tetrathiafulvalene) (PTTF), Quinone Polymers, Polyhydroquinone (PHQ), Polydopamine (PDA), Polytyramine (PTA), Poly-para-phenylediamine (PpPDA), Poly(Vinylferrocene) (PVF or PVFc) (Organometallic Redox Polymer), Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acids (Nafion), Poly(Styrene Sulfonate) (PSS), Poly(4-vinylpyridine) (PVP, QPVP), Polyaniline (PANI) and PANI Derivatives, Poly(1-aminoanthracene), Poly(o-toluidine), Poly(1,8-diaminonaphthalene) (PDAN), Poly(aniline-co-N-propanesulfonic acid-aniline), Poly(Diphenylamine) (PDPA), Poly(2-Aminodiphenylamine) (P2ADPA), Poly(o-Phenylenediamine) (PPDA), Poly(o-Aminophenol) (POAP), Polyluminol (PL), Polypyrrole (PP) and PP Derivatives, Polyindole and Derivatives, Polymelatonin (PM), Polyindoline, Polycarbazoles (PCz), Polythiophene (PT) and PT Derivatives, Polyazines, Poly(1-Hydroxyphenazine) (PPhOH), Poly(Acridine Red) (PAR), Poly(Phenosafranin) (PPhS), Polyflavin (PFl), Poly(New Fuchsin) (PnF), Polyfluorene (PF), Poly(9-Fluorenone) (PFO), Poly (9,10-Dihydrophenanthrene), Poly(p-Phenylene) (PPP), Poly(Phenylenevinylene) (PPPV), Polytriphenylamine (PTPA), Poly(4-Vinyl-Triphenylamine) (PVTPA), Polyrhodanine (PRh), Poly (Eriochrome Black T), Poly(5-Amino-1,4-Naphthoquinone) (PANQ), Poly(5-Amino-1-Naphthol), Poly(4-Ferrocenylmethylidene-4H-Cyclopenta-[2,1-b;3,4-b.sup.0]-Dithiophene), Fullerene-Functionalized Poly(Terthiophenes) (PTTh-BB), Poly[Iron(4-(2-Pyrrol-1-Ylethyl)-4.sup.0-Methyl-2,2.sup.0-Bipyridine).sub.3.sup.2+], Polypyrrole Functionalized by Ru(bpy)(CO).sub.2, Poly(Tetra-Substituted Porphyrins), Poly(Tetra-Substituted Phtalocyanines), Poly[4,4.sup.0(5.sup.0)-Bis(3,4-Ethylenedioxy)Thien-2-Yl] Tetrathiafulvalene (PEDOT-TTF), Poly {3-[7-Oxa-8-(4-Tetrathiafulvalenyl) Octyl]-2,2.sup.0-Bithiophene} (PT-TTF), Poly(Aniline-co-Diaminodiphenyl Sulfone), Poly(Aniline-co-2/3-Amino or 2,5-Diamino Benzenesulfonic Acid), Poly(Aniline-co-o-Aminophenol), Poly(m-Toluidine-co-o-Phenylenediamine), Poly (Luminol-Aniline), polymer of 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenediacetic acid (PDHAA), poly-para-phenylenediamine (PpPDA) and polyhydroquinone (PHQ), preferably among polydopamine (PDA), poly-para-phenylenediamine (PpPDA), polyhydroquinone (PHQ), polymer of 1,4-benzenedithiol (PBDT), polytyramine (PTA) or polymer of 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenediacetic acid (PDHAA).
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one porous template comprises at least a metal.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said at least one porous template is chosen among a metal-organic framework, a zeolite, carbons, a silica, an aerogel, a covalent organic framework, a porous polymer networks, a porous molecular solid, an hydrogel, a porous boron nitride, a porous graphene and a porous graphene oxide.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein said at least one porous template is chosen among a metal-organic framework, a zeolite, carbons, a silica, an aerogel, a covalent organic framework, a porous polymer networks, a porous molecular solid and an hydrogel.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said at least one porous template is a metal organic framework.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said metal organic framework comprises Fe-BTC, Cu-BTC, Cu-TDPAT or Al-BDC-NH.sub.2.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said one or more metal or metalloid is chosen among: palladium, platinum, ruthenium, iridium, gold, silver, rhodium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, arsenic, barium, radium, selenium, sodium, radioactive (U, Th, Ra, Cs), lithium, magnesium, indium, gallium, germanium, tellurium, bismuth, rhenium, niobium, molybdenum, osmium, lanthanides, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein said one or more metal or metalloid is chosen among palladium, platinum, ruthenium, iridium, gold, silver, rhodium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, arsenic, iron, cobalt, nickel and copper.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein said one or more metalloid is chosen among arsenic, selenium, germanium and tellurium.
13. The method according to claim 9, wherein said metal organic framework comprises Fe-BTC or Cu-BTC.
14. The method according to claim 11, wherein said one or more metal or metalloid is a metal chosen from among palladium, platinum, ruthenium, iridium, gold, silver and rhodium.
15. The method according to claim 1 further comprising removing the composite from the medium after the compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid have bound to the composite.
16. The method according to claim 15 further comprising regenerating the composite.
17. The method according to claim 16 further comprising exposing the regenerated composite to the aerial or aqueous medium comprising compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid, or to a second aerial or aqueous medium comprising compounds comprising one or more metal or metalloid.
18. The method according to claim 15 further comprising recovering the compounds from the composite.
19. The method according to claim 1 wherein the binding of the compounds to the composite is selective for a metal or metalloid of interest.
20. The method according to claim 19 the metal or metalloid of interest is a precious metal or metalloid.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(37) The applicants have started to design components for mercury remediation in order to produce clean potable water.
(38) In this work, the applicants have synthesized a cheap environmentally and biologically friendly iron base porous metal-organic framework (MOF), known as Fe-BTC, as shown in
(39) The MOFs unique framework architecture allows metal ions to diffuse through while inhibiting large organic molecules (like humic acid) from entering.
(40) The Fe-BTC MOF acts as a porous template that catalyzes the in-situ polymerization of a variety of small molecules.
(41) For example, the applicants have found that the Fe.sup.3+ sites of Fe-BTC distributed throughout the framework facilitates the polymerization of the monomer dopamine, to its polymer polydopamine (PDA) and adheres the polymer to the pore surface.
(42) During this process PDA is pinned to the internal surface of the pores via attachment to the open metal sites introducing extrinsic porosity to an intrinsically non-porous polymer as illustrated in
(43) Firstly, the applicants studied the rate of mercury removal (
(44) Secondly, the applicants studied the mercury removal capacity at low Hg.sup.2+ concentrations (
(45) The results of these experiments show that Fe-BTC/PDA is a highly porous composite that fosters the rapid, selective removal of Hg.sup.2+ from water samples containing high concentrations of Hg.sup.2+. Indeed, the composite component Fe-BTC/PDA binds up to 1634 mg Hg.sup.2+ per gram of composite, and removes over 99% of these ions from a 1 ppm solution to yield drinkable levels in less than a minute.
(46)
(47) The results of the experiments shown in
(48) In
(49) For the experiment presented in
(50) Hereunder is the proposed mechanism of the Fe-BTC/PDA composites' enhanced properties for Hg.sup.2+ remediation from water.
(51) ##STR00006##
(52) Through a reduction mechanism the Fe-BTC/PDA composite is able to remediate large quanitites of mercury.
(53) The material Fe-BTC/PDA has also proven to be easily regenerated and cycleable after reduction of mercury as shown in
(54) Previously described performance results are also maintained using real-world water samples from the Rhone River (which contains other metal ions and organics) and water samples spiked with large amounts of humic acid, illustrating the uptake selectivity of Fe-BTC/PDA. Thus, this material is an excellent, inexpensive candidate for in-home and industrial water treatment.
(55) The applicants have discovered the impact of the MOF Fe-BTC on the polymerization of the monomer dopamine to polydopamine (PDA).
(56) They have discovered that the polymer, PDA undergoes redox chemistry that fosters the extraordinary heavy metal remediation properties of Fe-BTC/PDA with Hg.sup.2+.
(57) After these experiments the applicants have tried to apply this composite to other metals with a high reduction potential starting with toxic hexavalent chromium Cr.sup.6+. For each experiment associated to
(58) For high resolution-XPS experiment of
(59) Hereunder is the proposed mechanism of the Fe-BTC/PDA enhanced properties for Cr.sup.6+ remediation from water.
(60) ##STR00007##
(61) Through a reduction mechanism Fe-BTC/PDA component is able to remediate large quanitites of hexavalent chromium. This result is very interesting as Cr.sup.3+ is 500 to 1000 times less toxic than Cr.sup.6+ hexavalent chromium.
(62) Previously presented results led the applicants to begin to design a variety of new redox activate MOF/polymer composites with the hope of creating high selectivity in order to design materials for specific analytes.
(63) Indeed, since it was possible to remove over 99% of Hg from aqueous medium comprising Hg.sup.2+ by a reduction reaction with Fe-BTC/PDA and since the standard reduction potentials of precious metals are comparable to Hg.sup.2+ reduction potential, as shown in table 1 hereafter, it may be possible to recover other precious metals from water. It is to be noted that the standard reduction potential of Cr.sup.6+/Cr.sup.3+ is of about 1.36 as shown in table 1 hereunder.
(64) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 standard reduction potentials E of various compounds (V) Half-Reaction E (Volts) Half-Reaction E (Volts) Li.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Li 3.040 SO.sub.4.sup.2 + 4H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2SO.sub.3 + H.sub.2O 0.158 K.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. K 2.942 Cu.sup.2+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Cu.sup.+ 0.159 Rb.sup.+ +e.sup. .fwdarw. Rb 2.942 HAsO.sub.2 + 3H.sup.+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. As + 2H.sub.2O 0.248 Cs.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Cs 2.923 UO.sub.2.sup.2+ + 4H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. U.sup.4+ + 2H.sub.2O 0.27 Ba.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Ba 2.92 Bi.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Bi 0.3172 Sr.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Sr 2.89 Cu.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Cu 0.340 Ca.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Ca 2.84 O.sub.2 + 2H.sub.2O + 4e.sup. .fwdarw. 4OH.sup. 0.401 Na.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Na 2.713 Cu.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Cu 0.520 La.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. La 2.37 I.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2I.sup. 0.5355 Mg.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Mg 2.356 H.sub.3AsO.sub.4 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. HAsO.sub.2 + 2H.sub.2O 0.560 Ce.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Ce 2.34 O.sub.2 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2O.sub.2 0.695 Nd.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Nd 2.32 Rh.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Rh 0.7 H.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2H.sup. 2.25 Tl.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Tl 0.72 Sc.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Sc 2.03 Fe.sup.3+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Fe.sup.2+ 0.771 Be.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Be 1.97 NO.sub.3.sup. + 2H.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. NO.sub.2 + H.sub.2O 0.775 Al.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Al 1.676 Hg.sub.2.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Hg 0.7960 U.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. U 1.66 Ag.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Ag 0.7991 Ti.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Ti 1.63 O.sub.2 + 4H.sup.+ (10.sup.7M) + 4e.sup. .fwdarw. 2H.sub.2O 0.815 Hf.sup.4+ + 4e.sup. .fwdarw. Hf 1.56 AmO.sub.2.sup.+ + 4H.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Am.sup.4+ + 2H.sub.2O 0.82 No.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. No 1.2 NO.sub.3.sup. + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. NO.sub.2.sup. + H.sub.2O 0.835 Mn.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Mn 1.18 OsO.sub.4 + 8H.sup.+ + 8e.sup. .fwdarw. Os + 4H.sub.2O 0.84 Cr.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Cr 0.90 Hg.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Hg 0.8535 2H.sub.2O + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2 + 2OH.sup. 0.828 2Hg.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Hg.sub.2.sup.2+ 0.9110 Zn.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Zn 0.7626 Pd.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pd 0.915 Cr.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Cr 0.74 NO.sub.3.sup. + 4H.sup.+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. NO(g) + 2H.sub.2O 0.957 Ga.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Ga 0.529 Br.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2Br.sup. 1.0652 U.sup.4+ + e.sup. > U.sup.3+ 0.52 SeO.sub.4.sup.2 + 4H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2SeO.sub.3 + H.sub.2O 1.151 2CO.sub.2 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2C.sub.2O.sub.4 0.475 Ir.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Ir 1.156 S + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. S.sup.2 0.447 Pt.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pt 1.188 Fe.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Fe 0.44 O.sub.2 + 4H.sup.+ + 4e.sup. .fwdarw. 2H.sub.2O 1.229 Cr.sup.3+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Cr.sup.2+ 0.424 Tl.sup.3+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Tl.sup.+ 1.25 2H.sub.2O + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2 + 2OH.sup. (10.sup.7M) 0.414 Pd.sup.4+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pd.sup.2+ 1.263 Cd.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Cd 0.4025 Cl.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2Cl.sup. 1.35828 Ti.sup.3+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Ti.sup.2+ 0.37 Au.sup.3+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Au.sup.+ 1.36 PbI.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pb + 2I.sup. 0.365 Cr.sub.2O.sub.7.sup.2 + 14H.sup.+ + 6e.sup. .fwdarw. 2Cr.sup.3+ + 7H.sub.2O 1.36 PbSO.sub.4 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pb + SO.sub.4 0.3505 MnO.sub.4.sup. + 8H.sup.+ + 5e.sup. .fwdarw. Mn.sup.2+ + 4H.sub.2O 1.51 In.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. In 0.3382 Au.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Au 1.52 Tl.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Tl 0.3363 H.sub.5IO.sub.6 + H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. IO.sub.3.sup. + 3H.sub.2O 1.603 Co.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Co 0.277 2HBrO + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Br.sup.2 + 2H.sub.2O 1.604 H.sub.3PO.sub.4 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.3PO.sub.3 + H.sub.2O 0.276 PbO.sub.2 + 2SO.sub.4.sup.2 + 4H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. PbSO.sub.4 + 2H.sub.2O 1.698 Ni.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Ni 0.257 H.sub.2O.sub.2 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2H.sub.2O 1.763 Sn.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Sn 0.136 Au.sup.+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Au 1.83 Pb.sup.2+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Pb 0.1251 Co.sup.3+ + e.sup. .fwdarw. Co.sup.2+ 1.92 Hg.sub.2I.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2Hg + 2I.sup. 0.0405 S.sub.2O.sub.8.sup.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2SO.sub.4.sup.2 1.96 Fe.sup.3+ + 3e.sup. .fwdarw. Fe 0.04 O.sub.3 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. O.sub.2 + H.sub.2O 2.075 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. H.sub.2 0.0000 F.sub.2 + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2F.sup. 2.87 Sn.sup.4+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. Sn.sup.2+ 0.154 F.sub.2 + 2H.sup.+ + 2e.sup. .fwdarw. 2HF 3.053
(65) With this in mind, the applicants have synthesized and tested the following composites: Fe-BTC/PBDT, Fe-BTC/PHQ, Fe-BTC/PpPDA, Fe-BTC/PTA and Fe-BTC/PDA. In all polymerization reactions, the porous template retains its structural integrity, as determined by the powder x-ray diffraction patterns of
(66) These new composites are quite porous as illustrated by the results of nitrogen adsorption isotherms (77K) of
(67) Attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy illustrate new peaks from the vibration modes of the functional groups of the polymers of these composites (see
(68)
(69) Hereunder is the proposed mechanism of the Fe-BTC/PDA composite's enhanced properties for Au.sup.3+ remediation from water.
(70) ##STR00008##
(71) Such a mechanism is confirmed by
(72) For each experiment of
(73) For each experiment of
(74) For each experiment of
(75) From a roughly 100 ppm solution of Au, the bare framework is only able to remove 43% of the gold from water, but all the composites can remove over 99% of the gold, with some composites reaching even 99.9% removal as shown in
(76) For Pd, the bare framework can remove 96% from a 55 ppm solution while all the other composites can remove over 99% of Pd, as shown in
(77) Concerning Ag, at roughly 90 ppm (90.5 ppm), most composites showed removal capabilities less than the bare framework, but interestingly Fe-BTC/PDA is the only composite that is highly active for silver, removing over 99% of Ag from water, as shown in
(78) These results illustrate that the different redox active composites Fe-BTC/PBDT, Fe-BTC/PHQ, Fe-BTC/PpPDA, Fe-BTC/PTA and Fe-BTC/PDA can reduce and/or remove precious metals from aqueous media.
(79) It is to be noted that changing the polymer alters the activity and hence the selectivity of the composite towards certain precious metals. Remarkably the composites are highly selective and fast.
(80) For the experiment of
(81) Further it was discovered that Fe-BTC/PTA can selectively remove over 99% of gold from a 1 ppm Au.sup.3+ solution obtained from Milipore water (
(82) To stress the selectivity capabilities of the Fe-BTC-redox polymer, the applicants have assessed its Au removal performance in the presence of high concentrations of abundant Cu and Ni seen in electroplating industry for example. To do so, Millipore water was spiked with 190000 ppb of Au.sup.3+ and 200000 ppb of Cu.sup.2+ and Ni.sup.2+. 20 mL of the solutions were treated with 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PTA for 24 hours. Results are presented in
(83) At lower concentration, 1000 ppb of Au, the results are remarkable: Fe-BTC/PTA is capable of removing 99% of Au in the presence of roughly 200000 ppb concentration of Cu and Ni, as shown in
(84) After Fe-BTC/PTA, the ability of Fe-BTC/PpPDA to remove gold from water has also been studied more specifically.
(85) The experiments of
(86) In the experiment of
(87) For the experiment of
(88) The results of said experiments show that Fe-BTC and Fe-BTC/PpPDA remove 75% and 99.9% of the gold respectively (
(89) Further, as shown in
(90) The Fe-BTC/PpPDA composite's extraction efficiency was also investigated at varying pH, within the same e-waste simulated solution. For this experiment, 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA was added to samples of 20 mL of the aforementioned e-waste solution with varying pH. For each sample the pH was adjusted using 0.02M aqueous solutions of HCl and NaOH and was then remeasured. The vials were placed in a Thermo Scientific MaxQ4450 Orbital Shaker for 24 hours at 420 rpms and held at a constant temperature of 28 C. The samples were then filtered using a mm hydrophilic PTFE membrane syringe filter with 0.22 m pores to remove any solids for elemental analysis of the aqueous media.
(91) The results of this experiment are shown in
(92) The aforementioned assessments indicate that the composite to Fe-BTC/PpPDA has the unprecedented selectivity and the relevant stability needed for various gold extraction processes.
(93) While the material rapidly extracts Au.sup.3+ (
(94) As such, the material must be able to concentrate gold over time or with regeneration for actual implementation into recovery processes. So, the regenerability of Fe-BTC/PpPDA was tested. The results of this experiment are shown in
(95) For this experiment, 50 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA was exposed to a sample of 20 mL of previously mentioned simulated e-waste solution for five minutes. After said exposure the composite was removed from the solution and exposed to another sample of 20 mL of previously mentioned simulated e-waste solution for five more minutes, this process was repeated nine times. Then the composite Fe-BTC/PpPDA was soaked in ascorbic acid for four hours to reduce the imine (NH) generated during Au.sup.3+ reduction back to the amine (NH.sub.2) and then washed with ethanol. The regenerated Fe-BTC/PpPDA composite was again soaked successively ten more times into samples of the e-waste simulated solution, subsequently regenerated, and then washed. The same process was repeated one more time.
(96) The results of this experiment are shown in
(97) After three regeneration cycles, the composite reclaimed 0.29 mg of Au.sup.0 per mg of composite, a value that is readily increased with continued cycling.
(98) The composite/Au powder resulting from the previously described experiment associated to
(99) The gold can also be concentrated over time. In order to demonstrate that, the applicant have placed 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA in 10 L of a solution containing ppm Au.sup.3+. All of the gold was removed over a three-weeks period without regeneration steps. It means that the composite has extracted a weight of gold equal to about 80% of its mass. These results demonstrate that the Fe-BTC/PpPDA can concentrate metals also without regeneration step and that if simply soaked in large quantities of solutions with low concentrations of gold, the composite can still concentrate gold inside.
(100) In order to confirm the effectiveness of the Fe-BTC/PpPDA composite for gold extraction from e-waste, gold was extracted from actual solutions obtained from e-waste. For this purpose, metals were mechanically removed from a computer processing unit (CPU), and then leached into an aqueous N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) and pyridine (Py) solution. It should be noted that, like ore extraction, gold extraction from e-waste is currently done using toxic alkali cyanide agents and/or extreme pH conditions. Here, a facile method that utilizes an aqueous solution of N-bromosuccinimide and pyridine at near neutral pH levels has been used (reference is made to the article Environmentally Benign, Rapid, and Selective Extraction of Gold from Ores and Waste Electronic Materials Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 9331-9335, (2017), Yue, C. et al.) This oxidative leaching process is more environmentally benign than the aforementioned methods. The resulting solution is a blue solution that had a metal composition of 1470 ppm Cu.sup.2+, 95 ppm Ni.sup.2+ and 7.3 ppm Au.sup.3+.
(101) After soaking 30 mg of the composite Fe-BTC/PpPDA in a 20 mL sample of said blue solution, 86% gold removal was obtained in less than two minutes, over 90% in 10 minutes, and 95% removal in 30 minutes, as shown in
(102) With continued cycling and subsequent composite removal, it is expected that the extracted gold metal will be free of other competing metals, as previously observed in river water (
(103) The applicants have also studied the rate of gold removal from several matrices including river water, wastewater, electronic waste leaching solution, sea water, and a solution obtained after treating incinerated sewage with NBS/Py.
(104) For the experiment in river water, 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA were soaked in 20 mL of a solution comprising Rhone river water spiked with 120 ppb of Au.sup.3+, for various periods of time. After the time point was reached the sample was filtered and elemental analysis was done to calculate the % removal of gold. Such a concentration of 120 ppb of Au approaches the gold concentration in Alaskan river which is usually between 60 and 120 ppb. Indeed, mining operations near the fresh water sources tend to discharge metal ions into the environment.
(105) For the experiment in waste water, 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA were soaked in mL of a solution of waste water that contained 3.7 ppb Au received from a waste water treatment plant in Switzerland, for various periods of time. After the time point was reached the sample was filtered and elemental analysis was done to calculate the % removal of gold.
(106) For the experiment in electronic waste leaching solution, 30 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA were soaked in 20 mL of a solution of electronic waste water obtained by oxidizing and hence dissolving the metals extracted from a CPU in a NBS/Py solution (same solution as the one studied in
(107) For the experiment in Mediterranean sea water, 10 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA were soaked in 20 mL of Mediterranean sea water spiked with 1 ppm Au.sup.3+, for various periods of time. Said Mediterranean sea water had many other complex ions in the solution including Ca, Mg, Na, K, Sr, B and Pb. After the time point was reached the sample was filtered and elemental analysis was done to calculate the % removal of gold. We find that the final concentration of Au.sup.3+ is below our detectable limit, indicating it is less than 100 ppt.
(108) For the experiment in incinerated ash leaching solution, 50 mg of Fe-BTC/PpPDA were soaked in 10 mL of an incinerated ash leaching solution for various periods of time. Said solution comes from a treatment plant in Switzerland and the NBS/Py previously mentioned method was used to extract the metals. The resulting solution contained 5.47 ppm of Au.sup.3+ and many other species such as Ca.sup.2+, Cs.sup.+, Mg.sup.2+, Na.sup.+, Fe.sup.3+, Cu.sup.2+, K.sup.+, B.sup.3+, Zn.sup.2+ and Rb.sup.+. After the time point was reached the sample was filtered and elemental analysis was done to calculate the % removal of gold.
(109) The percents removal of gold over time resulting from the five experiments mentioned above are illustrated in
(110) Concerning waste water, the results show that, in less than 1 minute 90% removal is achieved, and in under 30 minutes over 99% of Au.sup.3+ was extracted from the wastewater solution and the final concentration was <10 ppt. This extraction is truly remarkable, particularly considering the high concentrations of organics in wastewater, which often competitively complex metal ions and also often foul mesoporous adsorbents.
(111) Concerning the incinerated ash leaching solution, the results show that in less than two minutes, the composite Fe-BTC/PpPDA is able to extract 61% of the Au.sup.3+ from the solution and then reaches 90% removal in 24 hours. Moreover, it can be observed little to no uptake of most of the other metal interferents present, as shown in
(112) Regarding the river water solution, remarkably, in less than 2 minutes the applicants have observed 90% Au extraction and then 99% removal in less than 30 minutes in the solution indicating that Fe-BTC/PpPDA could be implemented in mining Au from surface water sources.
(113) One of the most difficult challenges is gold recovery from the sea. Indeed, it is estimated that the ocean contains gold valued at 720 trillion US dollars. But, unfortunately, gold in seawater has an ultra-low concentration, less than 20 ppt, and is one of the most complex matrices in the world. For example, competing ions, such as Na.sup.+ can have concentrations that are 210 9 times higher than that of Au.sup.3+. As such, extraction of the precious metal from the sea is conceptually thought to be nearly impossible. The experiment conducted for
(114) Another compound has been made by functionalizing a porous template Cu-BTC by in-situ polymerization of bio-derived para-phenylenediamine onto the internal surface of the pores of Cu-BTC, thereby introducing extrinsic porosity to the intrinsically non-porous polymer PpPDA and obtaining Cu-BTC/PpPDA.
(115)
(116)
(117) Images of
(118) These results show that the polymerization of para-phenylenediamine onto the surface of the pores of Cu-BTC can also enhance its stability in water.
(119) The applicants have also tested Fe-BTC/PDA composite for extraction of Pb from water sample. As the standard reduction potential of Pb is much lower it was not expected to observe a reduction reaction.
(120) In a first experiment (see
(121) In a second experiment (see
(122) The results of these experiments are presented in
(123) Therefore, the applicants have discovered that Fe-BTC/PDA is able to efficiently reduce the concentration of Pb in water. X-ray diffraction experiments have been made and have shown no other lead compound. These results seem to confirm that the mechanism of action of the composite Fe-BTC/DPA for extraction of Pb from water is different from the aforementioned reduction process observed for Hg.sup.2+ and various precious metals.
(124) The composite Fe-BTC/PDA has also proven to be easily regenerated and cycleable in this context, as illustrated by the results of
(125) Concerning Pb extraction, other experiments have been made in order to study the selectivity of the porous template Fe-BTC and of the composites Fe-BTC/PDA, Fe-BTC/PTA, Fe-BTC/PHQ, Fe-BTC/PpPDA and Fe-BTC/PBDT, it means their ability to extract Pb from water comprising other common ions such as Na, Mg, Ca, Sr and K and organics.
(126) A first experiment has been made in a sample of Rhone river water comprising an initial concentration of Pb around 700 ppb and 39.49 ppm Na, 9.18 ppm Mg, 74.13 ppm Ca and 1.21 ppm Sr (
(127) A second experiment has been conducted in Mediterranean Sea water. For this experiment (
(128) These experiments show that the studied composites adsorb a significant amount of lead. In most composites it is possible to get below the EPA limit of lead in water in both Rhone river water and sea water. These graphs show high selectivity as there are many other ions in solution that compete with lead.
(129) The applicants have also studied the efficiency of the composite according to the invention for extraction of some specific chemical species from a gas medium.
(130)
(131) The introduction of porosity to redox active polymers has shown improvements in chemical separation of metals in water but also has shown an enhancement in small molecule gas adsorption and framework stability as well.
(132) In view of these results, the applicants believe that the composites according to the invention will be good for adsorption of Cl.sub.2 gas, ozone, ammonia, and also volatile organics compounds from air. It is to be expected that with the high reduction potential of Cl.sub.2 or ozone that the composites according to the invention would be very efficient for scrubbing toxic chlorine gas or ozone from air.
(133) Moreover, it is known that volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are well absorbed by intrinsically porous polymers (polymers that are naturally porous), as mentioned for example in the publication Rapid removal of organic micropollutants from water by -cyclodextrin polymer, Alsbaiee et al. 2016doi:10.1038/nature16185. And, as demonstrated by the applicants, it is possible to introduce extrinsic porosity to polymers using a porous template. For these reasons, it is supposed that the composites according to the present invention would also be efficient in extracting VOCs from both air and water.
(134) According to the invention, VOCs are typically chosen among ethanol, methanol, butanone, ethylbenzene, acetone, n-hexane, cyclohexane, toluene, benzene, various xylenes, dichloromethane and n-butylamine, benzothiophene, thioanisole, Methyl tert-butyl ether, Dibromochloropropane, Chloroform, Perchloroethane, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,2-chloropentane, ethylene dibromide, 1,2-Dichloroethene, Vinyl chloride, Dichlorodofluoromethane, Decabromodiphenyl ether, Trichloroethylene (TCE), organochlorine insecticides (DDT).
(135) The methods that have been used in order to synthesize Fe-BTC, Fe-BTC/PDA, Fe-BTC/PTA, Fe-BTC/PpPDA, Fe-BTC/PHQ, Fe-BTC/PBDT and Cu-BTC are described in details below. The method to obtain the compound of interest Fe-BTC/PDHAA is also disclosed.
(136) As mentioned before other MOFs such as Cu-TDPAT and Al-BDC-NH.sub.2 can be used in the context of this invention. Methods for obtaining them are also disclosed.
(137) Synthesis of Fe-BTC (Porous Template)
(138) ##STR00009##
(139) Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl.sub.3.Math.6H.sub.2O), 97% was bought from Alfa Aesar and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid, BTC), 98% was bought from ABCR GmbH and used without further purification. 19.44 g of iron(III) chloride hexahydrate, 6.72 g of trimesic acid and 240 mL of distilled water were loaded in a 1 L teflon reactor.
(140) The reactor was placed in a 1200 watts Milestone SynthWAVE Microwave Single Reaction chamber and pressurized to 5 bars with nitrogen. The reaction was heated to 130 C. over 5 min and remained at the temperature for 60 mins. After the reaction was cooled down to room temperature the orange solid was filtered under vacuum and washed with copious amounts of water and methanol. The resulting powder was loaded into a double thickness whatman cellulose extraction thimble and underwent soxhlet purification with methanol for 24 hours. After purification the sample was dried under vacuum overnight. The material was activated under vacuum at 150 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(141) Free Base Dopamine Synthesis (Monomer for PDA)
(142) Dopamine HCl, dry sodium hydride 95% and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. In a N.sub.2 purged, 2-neck round bottom flask, 10 g of Dopamine HCl was mixed with 80 mL of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 80 mL of anhydrous methanol. 1.264 g of dry sodium hydride 95% was added slowly in small quantities over a period of approximately 15 minutes. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 48 hours with flowing N.sub.2. After the completion of the reaction, the mixture was filtered under vacuum and washed with copious amounts of THF. The white powder was dried and kept under vacuum until further use.
(143) .sup.1H NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4): =6.72 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J. 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (dd, J. 8.0, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 2H)
(144) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PDA (Polydopamine)
(145) Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 500 mL 2-neck round bottom flask using a schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation of Fe-BTC, the reaction vessel was cooled to room temperature and then N.sub.2 was flowed over the sample for 10 minutes. After the sample was sealed under an inert atmosphere, 400 mL 0.02 M anhydrous methanol solution containing the as-prepared free base dopamine, was prepared in a glove box purged with N.sub.2. Using a steel cannula and N.sub.2, the methanol/dopamine solution was transferred to the flask containing the activated Fe-BTC. Over a period of 1 hour, the orange powder turned dark purple indicative of polymerization. The reaction was allowed to stir for 24 hours at room temperature under an inert atmosphere. After completion, the reaction mixture was filtered under vacuum and washed with copious amounts of methanol and water. To remove any excess dopamine, the resulting purple powder was loaded into a double thickness Whatman cellulose extraction thimble, and the composite underwent soxhlet extraction with methanol for 24 hours under N.sub.2. Afterwards, the sample was dried under vacuum at room temperature over night, and then the material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(146) Elemental Analysis Fe-BTC/PDA-19: C, 39.553%; N, 1.81%; H, 2.45%; Fe, 17.84%
(147) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PTA (Polytyramine)
(148) Tyramine 99% and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich without further purification. 2 g of Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 500 mL 2-neck round bottom flask using a schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and then N.sub.2 was flowed over the sample. A 400 mL anhydrous ethanol 0.06 M solution of tyramine was prepared in a nitrogen purged glove box. Using a steel cannula and N.sub.2, the ethanol/tyramine solution was transferred to the flask containing the activated Fe-BTC. The orange powder turned dark purple indicative of polymerization. The reaction was allowed to stir for 24 hours at room temperature under an inert atmosphere. After completion, the reaction mixture was filtered under vacuum. Once dry the sample was placed in a vacuum oven and heated at 125 C. over night. The material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(149) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PpPDA
(150) para-phenylenediamine >99% and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich without further purification. 0.300 g of Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 100 mL 2-neck round bottom flask using a schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation, the sample was cooled to room temperature and then N.sub.2 was flowed over the sample. 0.384 g of pphenylenediame was added to 50 mL anhydrous methanol in a nitrogen purged glove box. Using a steel cannula and N.sub.2, the ethanol/para-phenylenediamine solution was transferred to the flask containing the activated Fe-BTC. The orange powder turned dark purple indicative of polymerization. The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature under an inert atmosphere for 24 hours. After completion, the powder was recovered using vacuum filtration. The material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(151) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PHQ
(152) Hydroquinone 99.5% and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich without further purification. 0.2 g of Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 100 mL 2-neck round bottom flask and schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation, the sample was allowed to cool to room temperature and then N.sub.2 was flowed over the sample. 0.869 g of hydroquinone was added to 50 mL of anhydrous ethanol in nitrogen purged glove box. Using a steel cannula, and N.sub.2, the ethanol/hydroquinone solution was transferred to the reaction flask containing Fe-BTC. The reaction was allowed to stir for 1 hour to allow the monomers to diffuse through the porous system. After the diffusion of the monomers equilibrated, 1.5 mL of 25% NH.sub.3 in water was added to the reaction vessel with a syringe. The orange powder turned dark purple indicative of polymerization. The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature under an inert atmosphere for 24 hours. After completion, the powder was recovered using vacuum filtration. The material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(153) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PBDT
(154) 1,4-benzenedithiol 99% and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich without further purification. 0.2 g of Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 100 mL 2-neck round bottom flask and schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation, the sample was allowed to cool to room temperature and then N.sub.2 was flowed over the sample. 0.056 g of 1,4-benzendithiol was added to 50 mL of ethanol in a nitrogen purged glove box. Using a steel cannula, and N.sub.2, the ethanol/1,4-benzenedithiol solution was transferred to the reaction flask containing Fe-BTC. The reaction was allowed to stir for 1 hour to allow the monomers to diffuse through the porous system. After the diffusion of the monomers equilibrated, 0.073 mL of 25% NH.sub.3 in water was added to the reaction vessel with a syringe. The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature under an inert atmosphere for 24 hours. After completion, the powder was recovered using vacuum filtration. The material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(155) Synthesis of Fe-BTC/PDHAA
(156) 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-benzenediacetic acid and anhydrous solvents were bought from Sigma Aldrich without further purification. 0.250 g of Fe-BTC was activated at 150 C. under vacuum overnight in a 100 mL 2-neck round bottom flask and schlenk line and an oil pump. After activation, the sample was allowed to cool to room temperature and then N2 was flowed over the sample. 0.0893 g of 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenediacetic acid was added to 50 mL of ethanol in a nitrogen purged glove box. Using a steel cannula, and N.sub.2, the ethanol/2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenediacetic acid solution was transferred to the reaction flask containing Fe-BTC. The orange powder turned dark purple indicative of polymerization. The reaction was allowed to stir for 24 hours at room temperature under an inert atmosphere. After completion, the reaction mixture was filtered under vacuum. Once dry the sample was placed in a vacuum oven and heated at 125 C. over night. The material was activated under vacuum at 125 C. for 17 hours before nitrogen adsorption and standard characterization.
(157) Synthesis of Cu-BTC
(158) Cu-BTC can be made using a Cu.sup.2+ salt and trimesic acid. In order to do that, the two compounds are added together in a water ethanol mixture. The material can precipitate out through the addition of base or by heating the solution. The result is a blue powder and is purified using a soxhlet extractor with ethanol as the solvent. The material is highly crystalline and has a surface area up to 2000 m.sup.2/g.
(159) Synthesis of Cu-TDPAT
(160) Cu-TDPAT is a copper-containing MOF where copper is linked by TDPAT ligands (where TDPAT=deprotonated 2,4,6-tris(3,5-dicarboxylphenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine).
(161) Since TDPAT is not commercially available, it has to be synthesized, for example by using the following procedures.
(162) In a 250 mL round bottom flask, mix together 7.6 g of 5-aminoisophthalic acid acid, 2.68 g of NaOH, 4.37 g of NaHCO.sub.3 and 70 mL of H.sub.2O. Cool the mixture to 0 C. using an ice bath and add drop wise 1.84 g of cyanuric chloride in 35 mL of 1,4-dioxane with an addition funnel. Heat the mixture to 100 C. under reflux for 24 hours. Once cooled to room temperature, adjust the pH to pH 2 with HCl. Recover the resulting solid by vacuum filtration and wash it with distilled water and hot methanol. The resulting solid is a dried powder. It is pure H.sub.6TDPAT ((2,4,6-tris (3,5-dicarboxylphenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine)) which is subsequently used for the synthesis of Cu-TDPAT. In a 100 mL bottle, mix together 30 mL of dimethylamine, 30 mL dimethylsulfoxide, 13.5 mL HBF.sub.4 and 1.5 mL H.sub.2O. After, add 2.46 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.Math.H.sub.2O and 0.45 g of H.sub.6TDPAT to the mixture. Place the bottle in a Thermo Scientific Heratherm oven and heat to 85 C. for 72 hours. After completion of the reaction, purify the resulting solid with methanol using a soxhlet apparatus for 24 hours. Dry the sample under vacuum and then heat to 125 C. before standard characterization.
Synthesis of Al-BDC-NH.sub.2
(163) Al-BDC-NH.sub.2 is a MOF containing Al.sup.3+ that are linked together by BDC-NH.sub.2 ligands (where BDC-NH.sub.2 is deprotonated 2,amino terepthalic acid). It can be synthesized as follows. In a 250 mL round bottom flask, dissolve completely 544 mg of 2-aminoterephthalic acid in 120 mL of dimethylformamide. Stir the solution at 420 rpm and heat to 110 C. Divide 1.45 g of AlCl.sub.3.Math.6H.sub.2O into 6 equal portions and add two portions to the heated mixture every 15 minutes. Stir the mixture for 3 hours and then turn off the stirring for another 16 hours. After completion of the reaction, filter the resulting yellow powder was and underwent soxhlet extraction with ethanol for 24 hours. Dry the sample under vacuum and heat at 125 C. before standard characterization.
Material and Methods
Inductive Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy
(164) Precious metal salts and standards were bought from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. Precious metals were simulated at different concentrations in water obtained from a millipore purification system and also from the Rhone river (Sion, Switzerland, Latitude: 46.228332, Longitude: 7.369975). The precious metal concentrations were measured using an Agilent 5110 Synchronous Vertical Dual View ICP-OES. Before ICP analysis, all samples, including the standards, controls, and treated water solutions were first filtered using a 25 mm hydrophilic PTFE membrane syringe filter with 0.22 m pores to remove any solid and then the remaining solutions were treated with HNO.sub.3 or HCl, to create a 2%, 3% and 5% acidic solutions. Five wavelengths were chosen for analysis and averaged.
(165) Batch Precious Metal Removal Experiments
(166) Fe-BTC and the composites mentioned above removal capacities were evaluated at low concentrations (1 ppm) and at higher concentrations (>60 ppm). Aqueous solutions of Au.sup.3+(AuCl.sub.3), Pd.sup.2+(Pd(NO.sub.3).sub.2 and Ag.sup.+(Ag(NO.sub.3) were prepared using millipore water and water from the Rhone river (Sion, Switzerland, Latitude: 46.228332, Longitude: 7.369975). About 10 mg of Fe-BTC or the composites were added to 20 mL of the solution and the vials were placed in a Thermo Scientific MaxQ4450 Orbital Shaker for 24 hours at 400 rpms and held at a constant temperature of 30 C. The samples were filtered using a 25 mm hydrophilic PTFE membrane syringe filter with 0.22 m pores to remove any solids and elemental analysis was carried out on the remaining aqueous media after acidification.