DETERMINING IMPLANTATION CONFIGURATION FOR A PROSTHETIC COMPONENT OR APPLICATION OF A RESURFACING TOOL

Abstract

Systems and methods for modifying a shoulder joint configuration exhibiting wear that take into account resultant of forces responsible for the wear of the glenoid surface from geometric characteristics of wear.

Claims

1. (canceled)

2. A method comprising: obtaining, by a computer and in a first three-dimensional coordinate system, a position of implantation of a glenoid implant on a scapula of a patient; determining, by the computer and based on one or more physical markers attached to the scapula of the patient, a position of the scapula in a second three-dimensional coordinate system during a surgical procedure on the patient; establishing, by the computer, a link between the first three-dimensional coordinate system and the second three-dimensional coordinate system; and outputting, for display at a screen and based on the link, guidance for fitting the glenoid implant at the obtained position of implantation of the glenoid implant during the surgical procedure.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the position of the scapula comprises: receiving, by a sensor connected to the computer, electromagnetic radiation returned from the one or more physical markers; and determining the position based on the received electromagnetic radiation.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein outputting the guidance comprises outputting a graphical representation of the guidance.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising: determining geometric characteristics of wear of a glenoid surface of the scapula from mapping data related to the glenoid surface of the scapula; and determining vector characteristics of a force resultant of forces responsible for the wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of the wear, wherein determining the position of implantation of the glenoid implant comprises determining the position of implantation based on the force resultant of forces responsible for wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of wear and based on action of the force resultant on articular cooperation between the scapula as prosthesized with the glenoid implant and a humerus of the patient.

6. A system comprising: means for obtaining, in a first three-dimensional coordinate system, a position of implantation of a glenoid implant on a scapula of a patient; means for determining, based on one or more physical markers attached to the scapula of the patient and during a surgical procedure on the patient, a position of the scapula in a second three-dimensional coordinate system; means for establishing a link between the first three-dimensional coordinate system and the second three-dimensional coordinate system; and means for guiding, during the surgical procedure and based on the link, movement of the glenoid implant to the obtained position of implantation of the glenoid implant.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the means for determining the position of the scapula comprise: means for receiving electromagnetic radiation returned from the one or more physical markers; and means for determining the position based on the received electromagnetic radiation.

8. The system of claim 6, wherein the means for guiding the movement of the glenoid implant comprise means for outputting a graphical representation of the movement.

9. The system of claim 6, further comprising: means for determining geometric characteristics of wear of a glenoid surface of the scapula from mapping data related to the glenoid surface of the scapula; and means for determining vector characteristics of a force resultant of forces responsible for the wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of the wear, wherein the means for determining the position of implantation of the glenoid implant comprise means for determining the position of implantation based on the force resultant of forces responsible for the wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of wear and based on action of the force resultant on articular cooperation between the scapula as prosthesized with the glenoid implant and a humerus of the patient.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed, cause a computer to: obtain, in a first three-dimensional coordinate system, a position of implantation of a glenoid implant on a scapula of a patient; determine, based on one or more physical markers attached to the scapula of the patient, a position of the scapula in a second three-dimensional coordinate system during a surgical procedure on the patient; establish a link between the first three-dimensional coordinate system and the second three-dimensional coordinate system; and output, for display at a screen and based on the link, guidance for fitting the glenoid implant at the obtained position of implantation of the glenoid implant during the surgical procedure.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions that cause the computer to determine the position of the scapula comprise instructions that cause the computer to: receive, from a sensor connected to the computer, a signal representing electromagnetic radiation returned from the one or more physical markers; and determine the position based on the received electromagnetic radiation.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the instructions that cause the computer to output the guidance comprise instructions that cause the computer to output a graphical representation of the guidance.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, further comprising instructions that cause the computer to: determine geometric characteristics of wear of a glenoid surface of the scapula from mapping data related to the glenoid surface of the scapula; and determine vector characteristics of a force resultant of forces responsible for the wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of the wear, wherein the instructions that cause the computer to determine the position of implantation of the glenoid implant comprise instructions that cause the computer to determine the position of implantation based on the force resultant of forces responsible for wear of the glenoid surface from the geometric characteristics of wear and based on action of the force resultant on articular cooperation between the scapula as prosthesized with the glenoid implant and a humerus of the patient.

14. A system comprising: a computer configured to: obtain, in a first three-dimensional coordinate system, a position of implantation of a glenoid implant on a scapula of a patient; determine, based on one or more physical markers attached to the scapula of the patient, a position of the scapula in a second three-dimensional coordinate system during a surgical procedure on the patient; establish a link between the first three-dimensional coordinate system and the second three-dimensional coordinate system; and output, for display at a screen and based on the link, guidance for fitting the glenoid implant at the obtained position of implantation of the glenoid implant during the surgical procedure.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] FIG. 1 is an exploded, perspective schematic view of the shoulder of a patient, associated with prosthetic components of a shoulder prosthesis, according to some embodiments.

[0025] FIG. 2 is a schematic cross section of an unprosthesized shoulder, according to some embodiments.

[0026] FIGS. 3 and 4 are views similar to FIG. 2, showing in elevation two different implantation configurations of the shoulder prosthesis of FIG. 1, according to some embodiments.

[0027] FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a system for implanting, in the patient, the glenoid component of the shoulder prosthesis, according to some embodiments.

[0028] As previously noted, the drawings are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0029] Various embodiments related to methodology and systems for modifying a shoulder joint configuration, including determining an implantation position of a glenoid component on a scapula or a resurfacing process for the glenoid, by taking account of the muscular environment of the shoulder.

[0030] FIGS. 1 and 2 show, partly, a shoulder of a patient, comprising a scapula S and a humerus H. The scapula S delimits, on its lateral side facing the humerus H, a glenoid surface G. In the natural state of the shoulder, the head T of the humerus H bears in an articulated manner against the glenoid surface G. In a manner not represented in the figures, the articular cooperation between the scapula S and the humerus H is controlled by muscles extending between the scapula and the humerus, in particular the deltoid muscle and the rotator cuff muscles. Hereinafter, the expression muscular environment is used to designate a musculature including the abovementioned muscles.

[0031] FIGS. 1, 3 and 4 schematically represent a shoulder prosthesis comprising a glenoid component 1 and a humeral component 2. In the nonlimiting example considered here, the glenoid component 1 and humeral component 2 have respective overall cup portion shapes, delimiting respective articular faces 1A and 2A that are geometrically complementary to one another so that these components articulate with one another.

[0032] Some embodiments described herein relate to methods for determining an implantation configuration for the glenoid component 1 on the scapula S, by taking account of the muscular environment of the shoulder. In some embodiments, data relating to the anatomical geometry of the scapula S is initially available or acquired preoperatively. The data is used to draw up a three-dimensional map of the glenoid surface G of this scapula, after having defined a spatial coordinate system 10 of the scapula S. The spatial coordinate system 10 is, for example, established using noteworthy natural identification points of the scapula S.

[0033] In some embodiments, the mapping data relating to the natural geometry of the glenoid surface G is extracted from preoperational images of the scapula S, for example from scanner images. FIG. 2 is a cross sectional representation of the shoulder that corresponds to such a preoperational image.

[0034] In some embodiments, the wear of the glenoid surface G is characterized from the mapping data. Thus, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the glenoid surface G has, in its bottom portion and in all its anteroposterior dimension, a worn region G.sub.1, seen in cross section in FIG. 2. Although the worn region G.sub.1 is shown in the bottom, it should be noted that glenoid wears are often observed in the upper portion of the glenoid surface.

[0035] In some embodiments, the worn region G.sub.1 is characterized by its geometric characteristics as assessed relative to the remainder of the glenoid surface G. For example, the worn region G.sub.1 is optionally characterized by the dimensions of its peripheral outline in the three directions of the coordinate system 10, by its depth gradients in the coordinate system 10, and by other additional or alternate features as appropriate. As described in greater detail, these geometric characteristics of wear are chosen so as to help identify the mechanical causes behind the wear of the glenoid surface G.

[0036] To determine the geometric characteristics of wear of the glenoid surface G, a number of possibilities are contemplated. In some embodiments, determination of the geometric characteristics of wear includes using means for comparing the previously-obtained mapping data relating to the glenoid surface G to data relating to the anatomy of a reference glenoid surface, the data comparison being supplied by a pre-existing databasei.e., one that is generated prior to the surgical replacement procedure, or preoperatively. The means optionally include hardware, software, and computer implemented algorithms adapted for comparing the previously-obtained mapping data relating to the glenoid surface G to data relating to the anatomy of a reference glenoid surface.

[0037] Some embodiments include, computer modeling of a theoretical glenoid surface on the basis of the mapping data relating to a portion of the glenoid surface G that is considered to not be worn by using shape recognition algorithms and pre-established genetic and morphometric data. The remaining mapping data relating to the worn region G.sub.1 is then compared to the theoretical glenoid surface.

[0038] In some embodiments, the geometric characteristics of wear of the glenoid surface G are used in a subsequent step to estimate the forces responsible for the formation of the worn region G.sub.1. In practice, the appearance and the trend of the worn region G.sub.1 within the glenoid surface G are the consequence of the regular and repetitive action of a certain configuration of the muscular environment of the shoulder of the patient. In other words, because of a regular articular activity of the patient (movements the patient repeats frequently in the context of everyday life), the muscular environment of the shoulder applies to the scapula S and to the humerus H repeated stresses which, in the long term, lead to the appearance and the development of wear of the glenoid surface G in the region G.sub.1. This action of the muscular environment may be represented by a resultant of forces, denoted F in FIG. 2, whose vector characteristics are determined from geometric characteristics of wear of the glenoid surface G.

[0039] In some embodiments, to identify the vector characteristics of the resultant of forces F from the geometric characteristics of wear of the glenoid surface G, use is advantageously made of a pre-existing shoulder musculoskeletal model. The biomechanical model is optionally used to simulate the articular movements of the shoulder by quantifying the forces in the articulation between the scapula and the humerus of the shoulder and in the muscular environment of the shoulder. The shoulder musculoskeletal model is optionally used to construct a wear databasewhere several glenoid wears are simulated within the model, each wear being simulated under the action of different corresponding predetermined forces of articulation. Some embodiments include using comparison means, such as hardware, software, and computer-implemented algorithms for comparing the geometric characteristics of wear of the glenoid surface G to the duly pre-established wear database generated with the biomechanical model to approximate the vector characteristics of the resultant of forces F.

[0040] Finally, in some embodiments, means are provided in the form of computer-implemented algorithms, hardware, and software to use the vector characteristics of the resultant of forces F to determine an optimal position of implantation of the glenoid component 1 on the scapula S such that, in subsequent service, the glenoid component 1 opposes the resultant of forces F. In other words, account is taken of the action of this resultant of forces F on the future articular cooperation between the glenoid component 1 and the humeral component 2, according to the relative implantation configuration of these components within the shoulder of the patient. According to some embodiments, the shoulder musculoskeletal model is used again to simulate the articulation between the scapula S and the humerus H subject to muscular forces corresponding to the resultant of forces F and then to calculate, in the coordinate system 10, the geometric characteristics of a position of implantation of the glenoid component 1 so that the relative mobility between the glenoid component 1 and the humeral component 2 is balanced under the effect of the resultant of the forces F. In some embodiments, this balancing is advantageously determined so that, during movements of the prosthesized shoulder producing forces of resultant F, the articular contact region between the scapula S and the humerus H is substantially centered relative to the peripheral outline of the glenoid component, and not offset toward a peripheral portion thereof as shown in FIG. 3.

[0041] Thus, the abovementioned geometric characteristics, relating to the position of implantation of the glenoid component 1, help quantify the positioning parameters with respect to the scapula S in the coordinate system 10, namely the height of the positioning parameters in the three directions of the coordinate system and the inclination of the positioning parameters in the three directions.

[0042] In some embodiments, the position of implantation of the glenoid component 1 determined in this way is shown in FIG. 3, which illustrates balancing between the glenoid component 1 and the humeral component 2 while the scapula S and the humerus H of the shoulder of the patient to be operated on are subjected to the effect of the resultant of forces F. Conversely, FIG. 4 illustrates another implantation configuration whereby the glenoid component 1 is placed without taking account of the resultant of forces F. In the case where the resultant of the forces F are not accounted for, unlike in FIG. 3, the position of the component 1 does not satisfactorily balance the action of the resultant F with the mobility of the prosthesized shoulder, such that, as soon as the patient resumes everyday activities, and each time the patient repeats the actions that led to the appearance of the worn region G.sub.1 of the glenoid surface G, the shoulder prosthesis is stressed according to an unbalanced configuration between its components 1 and 2. Thus, where account is not taken of the effect of the resultant forces F, a significant long term risk of instability of the prosthesis exists.

[0043] On completion of the described methodology, and according to some embodiments, a preferred position of implantation of the glenoid component 1 on the scapula S is determined using hardware, software, and computer-implemented algorithms adapted to identify the preferred position of implantation according to, or otherwise taking into account, the action of the resultant of forces F on the articulation between the scapula and the humerus H of the patient to be prosthesized. As previously referenced, it should be emphasized that various steps of the method are optionally implemented outside an actual surgical intervention (i.e., preoperatively), without having to actually access the scapula S and the humerus H of the patient (e.g., via incisions in the soft parts surrounding these structures).

[0044] In practice, the implementation of the method for approximating the vector characteristics of the resultant of forces F and appropriate implantation position of the glenoid component 1 are assisted via computer means, for example including hardware, software, and computer-implemented algorithms adapted for carrying out the determination steps, relative positioning calculations, and simulation calculations previously referenced.

[0045] In some embodiments, a surgeon uses the data relating to the preferred position of implantation of the glenoid component 1 in association with implantation of a surgical assembly 12 shown in FIG. 5. The assembly 12 includes a computer 14 associated with a unit adapted for sending and receiving infrared radiation, the unit including a sensor 16 linked to the computer and an infrared power source 18 covering the operational field in which the scapula S of the patient is represented. To assist the computer 14 with identifying the scapula S in space, the assembly 12 includes a group of markers 20 which return, passively, the infrared radiation toward the sensor 16. The group of markers 20 forms a three-dimensional marking system assisting the sensor 16 with following the position of the scapula in space. The computer 14 is also associated with a video screen 22 capable of displaying useful information to the surgeon, such as information relating to the identification of the scapula S and other data described below, preferably in graphic representation form. The assembly 12 also comprises control means 24, for example in the form of a pedal that can be actuated by the foot of the surgeon.

[0046] In some embodiments, implantation of the glenoid component 1 in the preferred position of implantation includes using the computer 14, including hardware, software, and computer-implemented algorithms, adapted to establish a one-to-one link between the space coordinates using the group of markers 20 and the coordinate system 10 used to implement the method for determining the preferred position of implantation. For this, the surgeon uses, as an example, a feeler 26 which is identified in space by the sensor 16. After incision of the soft parts of the shoulder of the patient, the surgeon brings this feeler 26 to a set of landmarks, or noteworthy places, of the scapula S which are then used to define the coordinate system 10 where, by actuation of the control pedal 24, the surgeon acquires the position of the feeler 26 and stores the position with the computer 14. Then, from the positional data, the computer 14 calculates the mathematical link between the coordinate system 10 (FIG. 1) and the spatial coordinates of the sensor 16, where the computer 14 includes hardware, software, and computer-implemented algorithms adapted for such purposes.

[0047] The surgeon then fits the glenoid component 1 on the scapula S according to the preferred position of implantation. In practice, the corresponding movements of the surgeon are advantageously guided by navigation means driven by the computer 14.

[0048] Optionally, after the surgeon has incised the soft parts of the shoulder of the patient, but before he begins to fit the glenoid component 1, the surgeon can exploit his access to the scapula S to collect mapping data relating to the glenoid surface G. The mapping data can complement or constitute all the mapping data used to implement the method for determining the preferred position of implantation of the glenoid component 1. As an example, the mapping data relating to the scapula S is thus obtained peroperationally using the feeler 26 brought to the glenoid surface G. In other words, in some embodiments, the determination method is implemented peroperationally, as opposed to other embodiments in which the method of acquiring mapping data was described as being preoperational.

[0049] Various arrangements and variants of the determination method and of the device, and of the surgical implantation method and of the assembly used to implement such methodology are contemplated. As examples:

[0050] the means of identifying the scapula S and/or the feeler 26 are not limited to infrared reflecting markersmarkers sensitive to ultrasound or to electromagnetic fields, for example, can be additionally or alternatively used;

[0051] rather than the position of implantation of the humeral component 2 on the humerus H being predetermined, the position of implantation of the humeral component 2 can be adjusted concomitantly with the determination of an implantation configuration for the glenoid component 1;

[0052] the methodology and system for modifying a shoulder joint configuration is optionally implemented to determine a preferred implantation configuration for a glenoid component articulated directly on the natural head of the humerus H, without requiring the implantation of a humeral component such as the component 2; and/or

[0053] the methodology and system for modifying a shoulder joint configuration is optionally implemented in the context of the glenoid resurfacing of the scapula S, with or without the subsequent fitting of a resurfacing implant; in such cases, rather than determining a position of implantation of the glenoid component 1, as described above, the invention is applied to determine a position of application of a resurfacing tool on the scapula, in order to hone its glenoid surface G so that the latter can then be better articulated with the head of the humerus Hthat is to say, by taking account of the action of the resultant of forces F on this articulation, the considerations detailed hitherto regarding the determination of an implantation configuration for the glenoid component 1 apply by modifying the methodology to the determination of a positioning configuration for the resurfacing tool on the scapula.

[0054] Various additional or alternate modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the above described features.