Adapter for modular catalytic monoliths

Abstract

Adapters, devices, and methods are provided that permit catalytic monolith modules to be used in catalytic converter systems designed for fixed bed catalysts using granular catalysts. The adapter provides air flow straightening upstream from the catalytic monoliths, mitigating non-uniform flow into the catalytic monoliths. The adapter is reusable, allowing simple replacement of spent catalytic monolith modules.

Claims

1. An adapter for accommodating a catalytic monolith module in a catalytic converter designed for use with a fixed bed catalyst drawer, the catalytic converter having a catalytic chamber, the adapter comprising: a rigid frame having an open front face; and an air flow straightener comprising a perforated plate and a screen; wherein the open front face permits insertion of the catalytic monolith module.

2. The adapter of claim 1, further comprising tabs extending longitudinally along a right face and a left face for being supported by tab supports in the catalyst chamber.

3. The adapter of claim 1, further comprising a lip on a bottom face for retaining the catalytic monolith module.

4. The adapter of claim 1, wherein the dimensions of the adapter are about 32¼ inches long, 22 11/16 inches wide, and 4 15/16 inches deep.

5. The adapter of claim 4, wherein the catalytic converter is a CO—H.sub.2 burner.

6. The adapter of claim 5, wherein the CO—H.sub.2 burner is a Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner.

7. The adapter of claim 1, wherein the catalytic monolith module comprises: at least one catalytic monolith, wherein the at least one catalytic monolith comprises a catalytic noble metal dispersed on an oxide support washcoated onto a monolith substrate.

8. The adapter of claim 7, wherein the catalytic monolith is selected from the group consisting of an extruded ceramic catalytic monolith and a metal foil catalytic monolith.

9. The adapter of claim 8, wherein the catalytic monolith is extruded ceramic catalytic monolith with a channel density of at least 400 channels per square inch.

10. The adapter of claim 9, wherein the monolith module comprises a plurality of extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths separated by interstitial filler.

11. The adapter of claim 9, wherein the catalytic monolith module further comprises at least one retainer screen for retaining the at least one catalytic monolith.

12. The adapter of claim 8, wherein the catalytic monolith is metal foil catalytic monolith with an effective channel density at least 150 channels per square inch.

13. The adapter of claim 7, wherein the noble metal is a member of the group consisting of platinum, palladium, ruthenium, rhodium, and gold; and the oxide is a member selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, zirconia, titania, and ceria.

14. The adapter of claim 7, wherein the noble metal is platinum.

15. The adapter of claim 7, wherein the oxide is zirconia.

16. The adapter of claim 7, wherein a gap spans a distance from an inlet surface of the catalytic monolith to a bottom surface of the perforated plate.

17. A method of adapting a catalytic converter designed for use with a fixed bed catalyst drawer for use with a monolithic catalyst, comprising the steps of: substituting an adapter of claim 1 for the fixed bed catalyst drawer; inserting at least one catalytic monolith module in the adapter; and inserting the adapter containing the at least one catalytic monolith module in the catalyst chamber of the CO—H.sub.2 burner.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the steps of: removing the catalytic monolith module in the adapter when it is exhausted; and inserting a replacement catalytic monolith module in the adapter.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the catalytic converter is a CO—H.sub.2 burner.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 depicts an embodiment of the adapter with a flow straightener element having a perforated plate and a screen mounted on top, the adapter having a slot for insertion of catalytic monolith modules.

(2) FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary catalytic monolith module containing multiple catalytic monoliths separated by interstitial filler.

(3) FIG. 3 depicts a view of a monolith module inserted into the adapter. A gap is maintained between the flow straightening element and the catalytic monolith module.

(4) FIG. 4 depicts a flow straightener element consisting of a perforated plate and a mesh screen situated over the left hand portion of the perforated plate.

(5) FIG. 5 depicts a frontal view of a CO—H.sub.2 burner air flow path without the catalyst bed present.

(6) FIG. 6 depicts an adapter with inserted catalytic monolith module, positioned in a CO—H.sub.2 burner.

(7) FIG. 7 provides velocity flow profiles in the catalyst chamber of a burner without an adapter, with an adapter and a uniform perforated plate flow straightener, and with a uniform perforated plate and screen on the left hand side.

(8) FIG. 8 provides a comparison of the local flow velocity to the average flow velocity for the three scenarios depicted in FIG. 7.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(9) The adapter of the invention provides more uniform straightened air flow, directing contaminated air toward a catalytic monolith module inserted in the adapter. The adapter may be made from stainless steel, carbon steel, or other metals or alloys resistant to degradation in the environment of a burner, such as austenitic nickel-chromium-based alloys (e.g., Inconel®). The adapter supports the flow straightening element a distance upstream from the monolith inlet surface to permit flow straightening before the air enters the monolith. The flow straightening element may be a perforated plate constructed from any of a variety of temperature and corrosion resistant materials, such as those of the adapter itself. Additionally, the adapter is not part of the monolith module itself, so the adapter may be reused when an old or exhausted catalytic monolith module is changed out.

(10) Catalytic monoliths may be made from a variety of materials. In some embodiments, an extruded ceramic catalytic monolith is constructed from ceramic monolith substrate material, such as cordierite. The ceramic monolith substrate material is extruded, to produce an extruded ceramic monolith. Catalytically active material is then applied to the monolith to produce a catalytic monolith. In other embodiments, a metal foil catalytic monolith is constructed from metal foil monolith substrate, such as corrugated metal foil. The metal foil monolith substrate has catalytically active material applied and may then be wound, folded, or otherwise configured to produce the metal foil catalytic monolith.

(11) The catalytically active materials applied to either extruded ceramic or metal foil monolith substrates are typically catalytically active noble metals such as platinum, palladium, ruthenium, rhodium, gold, or any other highly active noble metal catalysts, and combinations thereof. To apply such catalysts to the monolith substrate materials, the catalysts are generally dispersed on high surface area oxides such as alumina, silica, zirconia, titania, ceria, and the like, or any combination thereof, and washcoated onto the monolith substrate.

(12) The adapters and devices of the invention beneficially permit the use of catalytic monolith modules which are easily handled using gloved hands, and can be used in a system incorporated in a space-constrained environment, such as a submarine's Mark V or other CO—H.sub.2 burner. The invention thus reduces necessary labor, reduces variability, lowers the production of dust when loading the catalyst into the submarine burner, and minimizes health risks to sailors. The adapters and devices of the invention also facilitate catalytic monolith modules to be produced more economically with simple rectangular dimensions because the flow straightener elements and supporting tabs are included on the adapter.

(13) With reference to the Figures, FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of an adapter 1 of the invention. The flow in a Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner toward the adapter is downward, and the flow straightener element in this case is mounted on the top face of the adapter 1. The flow straightener element has a perforated plate 7 with a mesh screen 6 placed over the left hand portion of the perforated plate 7 as shown in face-on view in FIG. 4. While embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to left and right sides or portions, those of skill in the art will readily appreciate that adapters may be constructed with the opposite orientation, depending on the orientation of the burner and baffle 15 where the adapter will be placed. A metal tab 8 extends along the sides of the adapter 1 so that the adapter 1 slides into the catalyst tray of the CO—H.sub.2 burner. The adapter 1 is supported by the catalyst tray tab supports 17 which are part of the burner, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. The front face 2 of the adapter 1 is open to allow one or multiple catalytic monolith modules 11 to slide into the adapter 1. A catalytic monolith module 11 may be installed into the adapter 1 before or after the adapter 1 is slid into the CO—H.sub.2 burner. The side faces 4, 5 and back face 3 of the adapter are closed. The bottom of the adapter is open except for a lip 9 (typically about one inch) around the perimeter to support the catalytic monolith module or modules within the adapter 1. Additional support lips may be provided on the adapter in some embodiments, such as where individual monoliths are used instead of a monolith module 11.

(14) FIG. 2 shows a catalytic monolith module 11 containing a matrix array of individual catalytic monoliths 12 with interstitial filler 13 between the monoliths. Such interstitial filler 13 preferably prevents air flowing through the interstitial spaces between the individual monoliths 12 in the monolith module 11, and may be made from ceramic blanket insulating material such as Fiberfrax® or the like. In other embodiments the monolith module 11 may be constructed from a single full size monolith catalyst 12 which occupies essentially all the area of the module, or other combinations of multiple smaller monoliths 12. The monoliths 12 themselves may be sized such that an integral number fits into the adapter 1, or fractional sized monoliths may be used in order to fill the catalytic monolith module.

(15) A catalytic monolith module 11 designed for use in the Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner, for example, may have a metallic frame 14 with outside dimensions of 32 inches long by 22½ inches wide by 4⅜ inches deep. Such a monolith module 11 may accommodate an array of individual catalytic monoliths. For example, monoliths 12 each of which measure 6 inches long by 6 inches wide by 3.5 inches deep (e.g., in an array of 5 monoliths in the length direction by 3½ monoliths in the width direction) with interstitial filler 13 in the form of blanket material separating the monoliths 12. Such a module 11 fits into an adapter slightly larger in length and width, such as 32¼ inches long by 22 11/16 inches wide by 4 15/16 inches deep, which itself would fit in the catalyst chamber of the burner. The adapter thus takes the place of the catalyst drawer in the catalyst chamber. As discussed below, the adapter is deeper than the monoliths themselves in order to preserve a gap 16 between the upper surface of the monoliths and the flow straightener. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the dimensions of the adapter and the module may be varied depending on the application, thus, other sizes may be constructed for use in other burners.

(16) When multiple modules are used, a high temperature fabric or blanket material (such as the material used for interstitial filler 13 which separate individual monoliths within a module) may be placed between the modules to prevent air flow between the modules. For example, three catalytic monolith modules with outside dimensions of 32 inches long by 7½ inches wide by 4⅜ inches deep could be placed in the adapter and used in the Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner. Alternatively, three catalytic monolith modules with dimensions 10⅔ inches long by 22½ inches wide by 4⅜ inches deep may be placed in the adapter for use in a Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner. Such an alternative embodiment may be preferred on a submarine where storage of full length monolith modules may be undesirable. Each assembled monolith module may optionally have a retainer screen designed to secure and constrain the monolith or monolith blocks within the monolith module. For example, the retainer screen in some embodiments is a heavy gauge stainless steel wire retainer screen with 7/16 inch square openings secured at the upstream surface and/or downstream surfaces of the monoliths. Other optional retention means will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.

(17) FIG. 3 shows a frontal view of a monolith module 11 placed in the adapter 1. The adapter 1 maintains a gap 16 (typically about one inch) between the top surface of the monolith(s) themselves and the perforated plate 7 or other flow straightener. This gap 16 is provided to allow dissipation of the turbulence that is created in the air as it travels through the holes in the perforated plate 7, providing a more uniform air flow to the catalytic monoliths. The gap is generally larger than the diameter of the holes in the perforated plate 7, preferably at least six times the diameter of the largest holes. The monolith module 11 is supported by the lip 9 that extends inside the bottom perimeter of the adapter. The tabs 8 on the side of the adapter 1 support the adapter 1 when it is installed in the burner, sliding along and ultimately resting upon the tab supports 17 inside the burner catalyst chamber.

(18) FIG. 4 shows a face-on view of one embodiment of a flow straightener of the invention, one having a perforated plate 7 and a mesh screen 6. The flow straightener is designed to promote more uniform air flow to the catalytic monolith. Without a flow straightener, air flow emerging from the baffle of the burner is biased toward the near side of the monolith, while the far side receives little air flow. The flow straightener provides for more even air flow and air pressure reaching the monolith, improving performance, efficiency, and life span of the catalytic monolith.

(19) The particular specifications for the perforated plate (e.g., the diameter of the holes) and screen (e.g., the kind and other parameters) can be adjusted to straighten the air flow for any specific application. In some embodiments, the perforated plate 7 is about 0.05 inches thick, substantially the same length and width as the adapter, and is sufficiently rigid to be supported solely by the upper lip around the perimeter of the upper portion of the adapter. The perforated plate 7 is provided with holes allowing air to flow through toward the monolith module(s). In some embodiments, the perforated plate has 3/32 inch diameter holes in a 3/16 inch staggered center pattern.

(20) In some embodiments, the flow straightener has a stainless steel mesh screen 6, such as a 200 mesh screen with openings of about 0.002 inch, which screen covers a portion of one side of the perforated plate. For example, the mesh screen 6 may cover about six inches of the left side of the perforated plate 7. The mesh screen 6 imposes a restriction on the air flow flux through the perforated plate 7 on the side of the perforated plate 7 closest to the air flow's emergence from the baffle of the burner, thereby providing more uniform air flow to the entirety of the catalytic monolith.

(21) In other embodiments, the flow straightener's perforated plate 7 has holes in a graduated pattern from smallest on the side nearest the baffle to largest on the side furthest from the baffle. Such a perforated plate functions as a flow straightener without the need for a mesh screen 6 to restrict the flow on the baffle side. Instead, the smaller holes on the baffle side together with progressively larger holes on the distal side promote the desired uniformity of air flow. As those of skill in the art will appreciate, the flow straightener perforated plate may be constructed with a variety of hole patterns, both in the size of the holes and their placement, in order to accomplish more uniform straightened air flow in a particular burner.

(22) FIG. 5 shows the air flow path in a Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner. This burner was designed for a fixed bed catalyst such as Hopcalite® type catalysts. After passing over the heater (not shown), the contaminated air travels upward within a narrow duct along the right hand side and over a baffle from the right hand side to the left before making a sharp turn downward to the catalyst chamber 18. The direction of air flow upstream from the catalyst chamber on the left hand side is predominately downward with a high velocity. The velocity of the air flow nearer the right hand side is much lower and less directed downward. Such a velocity profile is not suitable for a channeled monolith because air cannot travel from left to right within the monolith. The flow at the left side would be much higher than on the right side and such conditions would result in an overall diminished performance. Also, the top right hand side within the channels would tend to wear because it is the point where the air must suddenly alter paths from a slanted or angled downward direction to a straight downward direction. The tab supports 17 for the catalyst drawer are shown and allow the drawer to slide in and out.

(23) FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the adapter inserted into the Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner with a catalytic monolith module 11 installed. The perforated plate 7 and screen 6 are supported about one inch above the monolith module 11. The tab supports 17 that support the adapter (via the tabs 8) in the burner also prevent flow bypassing along the sides of the adapter. The air flow is straightened above the monolith module 11 and travels uniformly through the monolith catalyst therein.

(24) In some embodiments of the invention, the adapter 1 and perforated plate 7 as well as the frame 14 of the catalyst module 11 are constructed from stainless steel, Inconel®, Incoloy®, or the like. In other embodiments these components can be constructed from other metals or alloys that are resistant to degradation in the chemical and thermal environment present in the burner. The frame 14 of the module 11 protects the fragile catalytic monoliths from damage. The monolith module 11 fits into the adapter 1, which is then inserted directly into the burner, resting on the supporting tabs 17 of the burner. A catalyst tray or drawer designed to hold the disadvantageous granular catalyst is not needed.

(25) The adapter can easily accommodate both metal foil catalytic monoliths and extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths. Extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths are suitable for submarine application because they tend to be resistant to acid gases that may form from the undesired oxidation of compounds such as halogenated VOC. Typical extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths have channel densities (sometimes referred to as cell densities) ranging from 100 to 600 channels (or cells) per square inch. Depending on the application, extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths for the invention will have at least 50, preferably 100, more preferably 400 or more channels per square inch. In one preferred embodiment for submarine CO—H.sub.2 burners, the monoliths have a cell density of at least 400 channels per square inch. The geometric surface area and void fraction of a 400 channels per square inch monolith are approximately 64 cm.sup.2/cm.sup.3 and 0.64, respectively.

(26) In other embodiments, metal foil catalytic monoliths are also suitable for submarine applications. One advantage provided by such monoliths is that they can easily be constructed to most desirable dimensions. For example, a monolith module having a single metal foil catalytic monolith within can be made having dimensions of 32 inches long by 22½ inches wide by 4⅜ inches deep, which would therefore fit in an adapter designed for the Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner. By contrast, extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths having channel densities in the range of 400 channels per square inch are usually limited in size to 6 inch by 6 inch blocks, so that multiple monoliths and fractions thereof are needed to complete a monolith module.

(27) Typically, a metal foil catalytic monolith is designed to provide an “effective” channel density greater than 50, preferably greater than 100, more preferably greater than 150 channels per square inch. The channel density for metal foil catalytic monoliths is referred to as “effective” because unlike the extrusion process for extruded ceramic monoliths, a metal foil catalytic monolith may be constructed by spiral winding of metal foil, or alternatively by folding metal foil, typically corrugated metal foil, to create the channels. In one preferred catalytic monolith for submarine CO—H.sub.2 burners, the metal foil catalytic monolith has an effective channel density of at least 150 channels per square inch. The geometric surface area and void fraction of a monolith with an effective channel density of 185 channels per square inch made from corrugated foils in a herringbone pattern that are then folded to make layers is approximately 20 cm.sup.2/cm.sup.3 and 0.84, respectively.

(28) The adapter containing a catalytic monolith module is oriented to accommodate the direction of air flow of the burner in which it will be used. For the Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner, for example, the air flow is downward (as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6). Alternatively, in the Mark IV CO—H.sub.2 burner the air flow is horizontal, and the adapter of the invention would simply be suitably oriented.

(29) The following Example serves to illustrate the present invention and are not intended to limit its scope in any way.

EXAMPLES

Example 1—an Adapter for a Monolith Catalyst Module for Use in a Mark V CO—H.SUB.2 .Burner

(30) An adapter of the invention was constructed from ⅛ inch carbon steel sheet metal, with outside dimensions of 32¼ inches long by 22 11/16 inches wide by 4 15/16 inches deep. In order to simplify construction, the sheet metal was cut to the necessary dimensions and folded to make 90 degree angles to provide 1 inch lips on the top and bottom. The pieces were then welded along mitered corners to produce the complete rectangular structure. The device was equipped with an air flow straightener having an Incoloy® 625 perforated plate with 3/32 inch diameter holes in a 3/16 inch staggered centers pattern, with an open area of about 50%. The perforated plate was 0.05 inches thick, substantially the same length and width as the adapter (32¼ inches long by 22 11/16 inches) and was sufficiently rigid to be supported solely by a 1 inch lip along the perimeter of the top of the adapter. The flow straightener was constructed with a 200 mesh stainless steel screen with openings of about 0.002 inch, which screen covered 6 inches of the left hand side of the perforated plate. The tabs were also made from ⅛ inch thick carbon steel sheet metal and were welded to extend outward from the sides of the adapter by ¼ inch. The tabs were 1⅜ inches from the bottom of the adapter to ensure proper placement in the catalytic chamber.

(31) A catalytic monolith module was constructed with a stainless steel frame which measured 32 inches long by 22¼ inches wide by 4 inches deep. Individual extruded ceramic monolith blocks were constructed from cordierite, and were 6 inches square by 3½ inches deep, with a channel density of 400 channels per square inch. The catalytically active noble metal platinum was dispersed on a zirconia high surface area oxide support, which was then washcoated onto the extruded ceramic monoliths. The washcoated monolith blocks, now catalytically active extruded ceramic catalytic monoliths, were then arranged in the monolith module. High temperature ceramic insulation (Fiberfrax®) was used to seal between the monolith blocks to prevent air flow bypassing the monoliths. A heavy gauge stainless steel wire retainer screen with 7/16 inch square openings was used to secure and constrain the monolith blocks within the monolith module at both the upstream and downstream surfaces of the monoliths in the catalytic monolith module.

(32) FIG. 7 shows a comparison of the velocity profiles in the catalyst chamber when the adapter is not in place, with an adapter in place having a flow straightener in the form of a uniform perforated plate 7, and with an adapter in place having a flow straightener in the form of a uniform perforated plate 7 and a screen 6 on the left hand side. Severe non-uniform flow distribution is indicated by the high flow velocity on the left hand side when the adapter is not in place. The adapter using only the perforated plate 7 lowers the non-uniformity on the left side. The adapter with both the perforated plate 7 and screen 6 shows the lowest velocity on the left hand side. The average velocities for these three scenarios are 490, 305, and 240 feet per minute, respectively.

(33) FIG. 8 shows a comparison of the local flow velocity to the average flow velocity for the three scenarios discussed above. The values were calculated by dividing the velocity measured at each point by the average velocity of all points. The case without the adapter shows severe velocity variation with the velocity on the left side being approximately 3.0 to 3.5 times higher than the average velocity and lower than average velocities on the right hand side. When the adapter and perforated plate are used, the velocity at the left hand side is between 2.0 to 3.0 times higher than the average velocity. The velocity toward the right hand is predominately lower than the average velocity. Adding the screen to the perforated plate produces the most uniform velocity profile. On the left hand side, the velocity ranges from about 1.5 to 2.0 times higher than the average and the ratio towards the right side is nearly 1.0. The perforated plate straightens the incoming air flow, helps reduce wear on the right hand side of the monolith channels, and is less prone to wear than the ceramic monolith substrate material because it is made from metal. Monolith ceramic, as well as the washcoat adhered to either ceramic or a metallic monolith, are relatively soft compared to the perforated plate. In this Example using a perforated plate with uniform size holes, flattening the velocity profile sufficiently to enable efficient use of the catalytic monoliths was assisted by the addition of a mesh screen. The combination of the perforated plate and mesh screen produced a flow straightening element that is sufficient to allow the catalytic monoliths to be used efficiently.

(34) The adapter of Example 1 is well suited to accommodating catalytic monolith modules, whether metal or ceramic, for use in a variety of catalytic converters, such as a Mark V CO—H.sub.2 burner. For other burners with different dimensions, such as the Mark IV CO—H.sub.2 burner, suitable modifications to the dimensions of the adapter and catalytic monolith modules used therein may be made.

(35) The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described above, which are intended as illustrations of aspects of the invention. Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to such embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Functionally equivalent methods and components are within the scope of the invention. Various modifications of the invention, in addition to those shown and described herein, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. All cited documents are incorporated herein by reference.