A Pain Relief, Fracture Healing and Spinal Fusion Device
20200324147 ยท 2020-10-15
Inventors
- Quanqin Dai (Diamond Bar, CA, US)
- Trevor Theriot (Las Vegas, NV, US)
- John Lasso (Lagina Hills, CA, US)
- Joseph Horton (Newport Beach, CA, US)
Cpc classification
A61N1/0456
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device that comprises of a carrier that defines a centrally placed ultrasound transducer receiving hub and a left and a right electrode sheet, an ultrasound transducer that attaches to the receiving hub, and a controlled electrical generating device that connects to the carrier. The controlled electrical generating device powers and controls the frequency of the ultrasound transducer and the current delivered to the electrode sheets.
Claims
1. A pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device, the healing device comprises of: a carrier that defines a centrally placed ultrasound transducer receiving hub and a left and a right electrode sheet; an ultrasound transducer that attaches to the ultrasound transducer receiving hub; and a controlled electrical generating device that connects to the left and right electrode sheets and to the ultrasound transducer, the controlled electrical generating device powers and controls the frequency of the ultrasound transducer and the current delivered to the electrode sheets.
2. The pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device of claim 1, wherein the electrode sheets are covered with an electrically conductive gel.
3. The pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device of claim 2, wherein the electrically conductive gel comprises of at least one pain relieving analgesic.
4. The pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device of claim 3, wherein the at least one pain relieving analgesic is selected from the group consisting of a Menthol, a CBD, a Lidocaine or a Capsaicin.
5. The pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device of claim 4, wherein the frequency is in the range from about 1.0 MHZ to about 5.0 MHZ.
6. The pain relief, fracture healing and spinal fusion device of claim 1, wherein the frequency is in the range from about 1.0 MHZ to about 5.0 MHZ.
Description
DRAWINGS
[0018] These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regards to the following description, appended claims, and drawings where:
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
DESCRIPTION
[0023] As seen in
[0024] In an embodiment of the present invention, the electrode sheets 14 and 16 are covered with an electrically conductive gel. In a further embodiment of the invention, the conductive gel comprises of at least one pain relieving analgesic. The at least one pain relieving analgesic is selected from the group consisting of a Menthol, a CBD, a Lidocaine or a Capsaicin.
[0025] The pain relief and fracture healing device 100 is used by placing the carrier 10 over the area that is to be treated and then powering the controlled electric generating device 20 and lastly adjusting the frequency that will be delivered by the ultrasound transducer 12 and the current that will be delivered to the electrode sheets 14 and 16. The device can be used for 20 minute intervals on a daily basis.
[0026] An advantage of the present invention is that it provides a device that aids in the healing of fractures.
[0027] Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a device that reduces pain around areas that surround a fracture.
[0028] Yet another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a device that increases the blood flow around the areas being treated by the device.
[0029] Still another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a handheld device that is used to reduce pain.
[0030] Yet still another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a handheld device that is used by a user to heal a fracture.
[0031] While the inventor's above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope, but rather as an exemplification of several preferred embodiments thereof. Accordingly, the scope should not be determined by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.