Silver-impregnated two-dimensional structures for bromide removal

Abstract

Compositions for bromide removal include a two-dimensional material impregnated with silver. The silver may be impregnated in the two-dimensional material by contacting the two-dimensional material with silver ions in an aqueous solution, allowing the silver ions to adsorb on the two-dimensional material, and drying the two-dimensional material. Removing bromide from an aqueous composition including bromide may include contacting the aqueous composition with a two-dimensional material impregnated with silver, and allowing the bromide to react with the silver to yield silver bromide.

Claims

1. An aqueous mixture comprising: natural organic matter; bromide ions; graphene oxide; silver nanoparticles directly attached to the graphene oxide; and silver bromide, wherein the silver bromide is formed by reaction of the bromide ions and silver in the silver nanoparticles.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the silver nanoparticles have a maximum dimension of 100 nm or less.

3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the nanoparticles have a maximum dimension of 50 nm or less.

4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles are formed directly on the graphene oxide.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the silver nanoparticles comprise 0.1 wt % to 15 wt % of a total weight of the graphene oxide and the silver nanoparticles.

6. The composition of claim 5, wherein the silver nanoparticles comprise 1 wt % to 5 wt % of the total weight of the graphene oxide and the silver nanoparticles.

7. A method of removing bromide from an aqueous mixture, the method comprising: contacting an aqueous mixture comprising natural organic material and bromide ions with graphene oxide, wherein silver nanoparticles are directly attached to the graphene oxide; and allowing the bromide ions to react with the silver in the silver nanoparticles to yield silver bromide.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein contacting the aqueous mixture with the graphene oxide comprises immersing the graphene oxide in the aqueous mixture.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising removing the graphene oxide from the aqueous mixture.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the aqueous mixture comprises at least one of surface, groundwater, river water, and seawater.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 depicts a silver-impregnated two-dimensional material.

(2) FIG. 2 is a transmission electron micrograph showing silver particles formed on graphene oxide sheets.

(3) FIG. 3 shows residual bromide concentrations after treatment with silver-impregnated graphene oxide and powdered activated carbon and their corresponding precursor (unimpregnated) materials in nanopure water.

(4) FIGS. 4A and 4B show residual chloride and bromide concentrations, respectively, after treatment with silver-impregnated graphene oxide and their corresponding precursor (unimpregnated) materials in nanopure water.

(5) FIGS. 5A-5C show residual chloride, bromide, and dissolved organic carbon, respectively, after treatment.

(6) FIG. 6 shows residual bromide in water obtained from the Central Arizona Project after treatment.

(7) FIG. 7 shows residual bromide concentrations after treatment with different types of silver-impregnated graphene oxide and powdered activated carbon.

(8) FIG. 8 shows a relationship between the amount of silver added and bromide removal for different nanocomposites.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) Impregnation of two-dimensional (2D) materials with silver and the resulting silver-impregnated 2D materials are described. The silver-impregnated 2D materials are suitable for bromide removal from water. Examples of suitable 2D materials include graphene, graphene oxide, and molybdenum disulfide. The open structure of the 2D materials reduces interference of the water matrix and makes the silver more available to interact with bromide.

(10) FIG. 1 depicts silver-impregnated 2D material 100 in water matrix 102, with silver particles 104 coupled to 2D material 106 defining openings 108. Suitable examples of 2D material 106 include graphene, graphene oxide, and molybdenum disulfide. 2D material 106 may be a monolayer, or may include two or more layers (e.g., two to five layers or two to six layers). Water matrix 102 may include natural organic matter (NOM) 110. As depicted, silver particles 104 may be in direct contact with or directly attached to 2D material 106. In some instances, silver particles 104 are formed directly (e.g., nucleated) on 2D material 106. Silver particles 104 may be silver nanoparticles. In some examples, the nanoparticles have a dimension between 1 nm and 100 nm, or between 1 nm and 50 nm. The use of silver particles 104 increases the availability of silver for bromide interaction and increases the efficacy of the silver (e.g., the amount of bromide removed per unit of silver present) compared to silver ions adsorbed on 2D material 106.

(11) The high surface area of 2D material 106 and the spatial relationship of silver particles 104 with respect to openings 108 facilitates interaction of the silver particles with ions, such as bromide 112 and chloride 114 in water matrix 102. The open structure of the 2D materials makes the silver more available for bromide interaction in the presence of competing ions and interfering compounds such as NOM 110. NOM 110 is typically too large to enter openings 108 of 2D material 106, and therefore has little impact on the efficacy of bromide removal with silver-impregnated 2D material 100.

(12) Silver-impregnated 2D material 100 is suitable for use in the removal of bromide from a water matrix before, during, or after coagulation in a water treatment process. In some examples, the silver content of the silver-impregnated 2D material is in a range between 0.1 wt % and 15 wt % (e.g., between 1 wt % and 5 wt %, or about 1 wt %). The silver-impregnated 2D materials may also be applied as a slurry (e.g., in a slurry bed reactor) to remove bromide ions. Once bromide is removed by the formation of insoluble AgBr, the AgBr can be settled in settling basin, floated up by dissolved air flotation (DAF), or separated by high throughput membrane filtration (e.g., with non-polymeric membranes, such as ceramic micro- and ultrafiltration membranes).

(13) Graphene oxide (GO), a sheet-like structure of oxidized aromatic carbon sheets, can be obtained by chemical oxidation of graphite to GO. GO can serve as a scaffold for silver impregnation due at least in part to its open structure and its abundance of oxygen functional groups, which can be used to grow silver nanoparticles directly on the GO surface. Silver-impregnated GO can be formed by combining GO with a silver nitrate solution, and reducing silver ions in solution to silver on the GO. The silver-impregnated GO can be collected by centrifugation. FIG. 2 is a transmission electron micrograph showing GO 200 with impregnated silver particles 202 formed by this process.

Examples

(14) To make GO impregnated with silver (Ag) nanoparticles, several commercially available chemicals were secured. These include graphite for GO synthesis, silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) for silver impregnation, and sodium borohydride (NaBH.sub.4) as a reducing agent for silver nanoparticle formation. Impregnation of GO with silver nanoparticles was done by adding 0.2 g of GO to 10 mL of 0.01 M AgNO.sub.3 under continuous agitation. The reducing agent, NaBH.sub.4 (from 0.2 to 0.025 M) was added dropwise to reduce silver to silver nanoparticles on the GO. This procedure yields a high loading of small silver nanoparticles on the GO sheet. The nanoparticles typically have a dimension between 2 nm and 50 nm (e.g., between 2 nm and 15 nm, or about 10 nm). The silver impregnated GO was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 G for 30 min, dialyzed for 3 hours, and lyophilized until dry.

(15) For comparison, GO was impregnated with silver ions by adding 0.2 g of GO to 10 mL of 0.5 M AgNO.sub.3 or 0.01 M AgNO.sub.3, and the carbon slurry was then stirred for two days at 150 rpm at room temperature (203 C.). Then, the carbon sample was centrifuged for 30 minutes at 12,000 G rotation. The silver-impregnated GO was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 G for 30 min, dialyzed for 3 hours, and lyophilized until dry. For comparison, impregnation of commercial powdered activated carbon (PAC) by silver ions was done in the same procedure as for GO samples.

(16) Different types of graphene oxide were synthesized. Marc GO and Tung GO refer to graphene oxide prepared by synthesis reactions described in Marcano et al., Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide, ACS Nano 2010, 4 (8), pp. 4806-4814 and Tung et al., High-Throughput Solution Processing of Large-Scale Graphene, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 25-29, respectively, which are both incorporated by reference herein.

(17) All materials were characterized before and after silver impregnation by Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The silver content of each material was quantified by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after digestion of the sample in nitric acid.

(18) The capacity of the different materials for bromide removal was assessed using deionized (DI) water spiked with different constituents. Studies were conducted in completely mixed batch reactors (CMBRs, 125 mL plastic batch bottles) on an orbital shaker for four (4) hours to mimic water treatment conditions in drinking water treatment plants. The experimental volume was 100 mL with bromide was spiked to 200 g/L, chloride (where applicable, as competitive anions) was spiked to 20 mg/L, and NOM (where applicable, as competitive adsorbate) was spiked to 5 mg DOC/L.

(19) Bromide was spiked by a bromide stock solution (20 mg/L) prepared by dissolving reagent grade (99.0%) sodium bromide (NaBr) salt (Sigma-Aldrich) in 200 mL deionized water. Desired concentrations were obtained by diluting the bromide stock solution. The chloride stock solution (200 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving reagent grade (99.0%) sodium chloride (NaCl) salt (Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 mL deionized water and desired concentrations were obtained by diluting the chloride stock solution. The NOM isolate was purchased (as Suwannee River humic acids). The effects of NOM on bromide removal without other background-ion interferences were carefully studied at lab scale.

(20) After the experiments, the samples were analyzed for UV254 (UV-Vis Spectroscopy, Info) and DOC (SEC-DOC, Info) before syringe filtration. The samples were filtered through 0.2 micron syringe filters to remove excess organics and carbon sorbents. The filters were air-dried and SEM/EDX imaging for characterization by taking the carbon sorbents trapped on the filters. The filtered solution was analyzed using ion chromatography (IC, INFO) to measure bromide and chloride concentrations.

(21) FIG. 3 shows residual bromide concentrations in bromide-spiked water after treatment of the water with silver-impregnated GO (Marc GO-Ag and Tung GO-Ag) and powdered activated carbon (PAC Ag) and their corresponding precursor (silver-free) materials (Marc GO, Tung GO, and PAC) in nanopure water. The PAC and GO in this experiment were impregnated with silver by soaking in a 0.5 M silver nitrate solution. Initial bromine concentration was set to 200 ppb for all samples, and the dose of 2D material was 25 mg/L. After treatment with silver impregnated GO or PAC, residual bromide levels decreased by 60-85%, while the silver-free material removed less than 3% of the bromide present. Numbers above the bars show the percentage of bromine removal: 1.7% for Marc GO, 66.5% for Marc GO-Ag, 2.5% for Tung GO, 82.2% for Tung GO-Ag, 2.4% for PAC, and 84.8% for PAC GO. Error bars show standard deviation of triplicate experiments.

(22) FIGS. 4A and 4B show the results of experiments demonstrating the ability of various materials to remove bromide in the presence of chloride at different Cl/Br ratios. Bromide removal occurred in the presence of chloride. Chloride is a minimal competitor for bromide removal by both GO-Ag and PAC-Ag, even though more mass of chloride is removed than mass of bromide. Some chloride is removed, but a a larger percentage of bromide is removed compared to the percentage of chloride. There is minimal impact on bromide removal efficiency when the chloride:bromide ratio is altered or increased.

(23) FIGS. 5A-5C show the results of experiments to test the ability of GO-Ag and PAC-Ag to remove bromide in water containing dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Residual chloride, bromide, and DOC concentrations were measured after treatment with silver-impregnated graphene oxide (25 mg/L and 4 hour contact time before 2 m filtration). Initial conditions were chloride (20 mg/L), bromide (200 g/L) and DOC (5 mg/L). Addition of DOC reduced the ability of PAC-Ag compared to that of Tung-Ag and Marc-Ag to remove bromide from water.

(24) FIG. 6 shows residual bromide in water obtained from the Central Arizona Project (CAP) after jar testing. The bromide concentration in the CAP water before alum coagulation was 11916 ppb. In assessing the effectiveness of alum (28 mg/L), alum with 25 mg/L adsorbent (i.e., graphene oxide impregnated with silver) was added. All jars filled with 1-L source water were initially mixed for 6 minutes at 200 rpm to simulate coagulation (i.e., rapid mixing). The mixing speed was later decreased to 25 rpm for 20 minutes to simulate flocculation (i.e., slow mixing). In the last stage, mixing stopped and the flocs were allowed to settle out (i.e., sedimentation).

(25) No additives were used during the slow mixing and sedimentation steps. An aliquot was withdrawn from the upper midpoint of the jar using a 50-mL plastic syringe without upsetting the sediment. With the addition of alum only, 1% of bromide was removed. With the addition of alum and GO-Ag, 71% of bromide was removed. With the addition of alum and silver nitrate, 54% of bromide was removed.

(26) FIG. 7 shows the residual bromide level and bromide removal after treatment with GO and PAC impregnated with silver nitrate. The starting solution was deionized (DI) water with presence of 10 mg/L natural organic matter (NOM) and 250 g/L bromide. A total mass of 25 mg/L of silver-impregnated material was added to each solution for bromide removal. Bromide removal was reduced by the presence of NOM for the porous PAC material, while the more open 2D structure of Tung GO-Ag and Marc GO-Ag lessened the interference of NOM on bromide removal.

(27) FIG. 8 shows a relationship between the amount of silver added and bromide removal for different nanocomposites produced. The GO impregnated with silver nanoparticles with a dimension of about 10 nm (by the addition of NaBH.sub.4) removed more bromide per amount of silver added than silver adsorbed in the form of silver ions. The impregnation of the materials with silver nanoparticles (circles) shows higher removal at lower silver content than materials impregnated with silver ions (squares) using silver nitrate soaking. Different types of GO materials, prepared by different GO syntheses, were compared to assess the effect of the GO structure on the silver loading and bromide removal efficiency. Thus, nucleation of silver to silver particles allows for a more efficient use of silver to remove bromide.

(28) Only a few implementations are described and illustrated. Variations, enhancements and improvements of the described implementations and other implementations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this document.