Fabrication of metal organic framework materials using a layer-by-layer spin coating approach

Abstract

Embodiments describe a method of depositing an MOF, including depositing a metal solution onto a substrate, spinning the substrate sufficient to spread the metal solution, depositing an organic ligand solution onto the substrate and spinning the substrate sufficient to spread the organic ligand solution and form a MOF layer.

Claims

1. A method of depositing a Metal-Organic Framework (MOF), comprising: performing at least two spin-coating cycles using a fully automated spin-coating machine equipped with microsyringes, wherein a spin-coating cycle consists essentially of: depositing a microdrop of metal solution onto a substrate from a first microsyringe; spinning the substrate at 500-6000 rpm for a time sufficient to spread the metal solution; washing the substrate with solvent; depositing a microdrop of an organic ligand solution onto the substrate from a second microsyringe; spinning the substrate at 500-6000 rpm for 5-10 seconds, whereby the metal solution reacts with the organic ligand solution to form a MOF layer with a thickness within a range of 2 nm to about 300 nm; and washing the substrate with solvent; wherein the substrate is spinning at about 100 rpm or is not spinning when the metal solution, the organic ligand solution, or both the metal and organic ligand solutions are deposited; wherein the metal solution comprises metal ions selected from the group consisting of divalent metal ions and trivalent metal ions; wherein the organic ligand solution comprises at least one ditopic or tritopic organic ligand.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the organic ligand solution comprises one or more of 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (terephthalic acid), 1,3,5-benezenetricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid), 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (dabco), 2-Methylimidazole, bipyridine, and pyrazine.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises alumina, titanium oxide, polymer, copolymer, carbon, metal, or a metal oxide.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the substrate is porous alumina.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the metal solution comprises Zn ions, the organic ligand solution comprises 2-Methylimidazole, and the MOF layer formed is a Zeolite Imidazolate Framework number 8 (ZIF-8) MOF layer.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the metal solution comprises Cu ions, the organic ligand solution comprises 1,3,5-benezenetricarboxylic acid, and MOF layer formed is a Hong Kong University of Science and Technology number 1 (HKUST-1) MOF layer.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein the substrate includes gold functionalized with self-assembled monolayers.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising functionalizing the substrate with self-assembled monolayers consisting of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid before performing the first spin-coating cycle.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein a portion of the substrate is pre-patterned with self-assembled monolayers.

10. The method of claim 3, wherein the metal ions are selected from the group consisting of Fe, Al, Cu, Ni, Zn, Mn, Cd and Co ions and the ditopic or tritopic organic ligand is selected from the group consisting of terephthalic acid, trimesic acid, dabco, 2-Methylimidazole, and bipyridine.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising washing and drying the substrate before performing the first spin-coating cycle.

12. The method of claim 5, wherein 10 to 200 cycles of spin-coating are performed.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein performing 200 cycles produces a ZIF-8MOF film on the substrate with a thickness of 5 m.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein performing 200 cycles requires about 1.5 hours.

15. The method of claim 9, wherein 10 to 100 cycles of spin-coating are performed.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein performing 100 cycles requires 50 minutes.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate is spinning at about 100 rpm when both the metal and organic ligand solutions are deposited.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the organic ligand solution comprises two or more different ditopic or tritopic organic ligands selected from the group consisting of terephthalic acid, 2-Methylimidazole, trimesic acid, dabco, bipyridine, and pyrazine.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate is spun at a speed of 500-800 rpm after deposition of the metal solution and after deposition of the organic ligand solution.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1 illustrates a block flow diagram of a method of depositing a layer of MOF on a substrate, according to one or more embodiments.

(2) FIG. 2A illustrates out-of-plane X-ray diffraction data of a Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O SURMOF grown on a COOH terminated SAM after different cycles, according to one or more embodiments.

(3) FIG. 2B illustrates a plot of a Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O SURMOF thickness per growth cycle, according to one or more embodiments.

(4) FIG. 2C illustrates out-of-plane X-ray diffraction data of a Zn.sub.2(bdc).xH.sub.2O SURMOF grown on a COOH terminated Au-substrate, according to one or more embodiments.

(5) FIG. 3 illustrates the results of a gas separation study for a ZIF-8 MOF membrane, according to one or more embodiments.

(6) FIG. 4 illustrates a data for NH.sub.3 sensing capabilities of a Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O MOF on QCM substrate, according to one or more embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(7) Described herein are novel spin coating methods for fabricating highly oriented and crystalline coatings of highly porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) on various solid substrates. The methods are capable of producing homogeneous MOF films with controllable thicknesses, and are based on adapting LPE synthesis to spin coating. Such spin coating methods not only can provide significantly higher output as compared to LPE and dipping processes, but also dramatically decrease the consumption of chemicals and solvents, which make them more economically feasible for industrial application. Through applying this new approach, it is possible to fabricate thick (m) layers of several types of MOFs, including Cu(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O, Zn(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O, HKUST-1 and ZIF-8, on various substrates like functionalized Au and aluminum oxide substrates.

(8) Metal organic framework materials (MOFs) are crystalline materials composed of both inorganic and organic components in a porous networked structure. Metal organic framework materials exhibit exceptionally high specific surface area, in addition to tunable pore size and functionality, which make them attractive in many applications, including gas storage, gas separation, catalysis, drug delivery, light-emitting devices, and sensing.

(9) MOFs can be applied in gas storage for hydrogen and hydrocarbons, gas separation, gas sensors and catalysis. MOFs can include metal cations M.sup.n+ (n=2, 3) and functionalized polytopic organic ligands. MOFs have cavities and/or channels readily available for adsorption of guest molecules, embedding of nano-clusters or more generally for anchoring various functional species to match the pore size in the scaffold. One theme of this chemistry is the rational design and precise control of the formation of the respective network.

(10) Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can be made by linking inorganic and organic units by strong bonds. The flexibility with which the constituents' geometry, size, and functionality can be varied can lead to many different MOFs. The organic units can be ditopic, polytopic organic carboxylates (and other similar negatively charged molecules), which, when linked to metal-containing units, can yield architecturally robust crystalline MOF structures with a porosity of greater than 50% of the MOF crystal volume. The surface area values of such MOFs can range from 1000 to 10,000 m.sup.2/g, thus exceeding those of traditional porous materials such as zeolites and carbons. To date, MOFs with permanent porosity are more extensive in their variety and multiplicity than many other classes of porous materials. These aspects have made MOFs ideal candidates for storage of fuels (hydrogen and methane), capture of carbon dioxide, and catalysis applications, to mention a few.

(11) The use of MOFs as powder materials is evident, but the integration of MOFs as novel building blocks and functional units for bottom-up nanotechnology requires precise control over the process of crystallization of MOFs on surfaces. Smart membranes, catalytic coatings, chemical sensors, and many other related nanotechnology applications depend on the production of controlled thin films and coatings with well-defined porosity, chemical composition, and tunable functionality. Zeolites, MOFs, organic polymers, metal oxides and activated carbon can be used. The growth of thin MOF films can use an in-situ crystallization method on surfaces, in particular of MOF-5, HKUST-1 and many other MOFs. Oriented MOF thin films can be anchored from mother liquor solution as a function of the surface functional groups of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) (COOH and OH, respectively) for different types of MOFs.

(12) Layer-by-layer (or Liquid phase epitaxy) method can be used to grow thin MOF layers. For example, HKUST-1 MOF can be grown using LBL method on metal surfaces functionalized with SAMs, specifically to steer and control the growth orientation.

(13) The spin-coating approach offers a platform for depositing uniform thin films to substrates that can be tuned easily and used. The method can be easily automated using the available spin coating commercial devices. Inorganic, organic components and solvents are tunable, which permits facile alteration of MOF layers and functionality. It is also possible to scale up on different substrate sizes and there is no limitation for substrate type, such as metals, metal oxides, polymers, etc.

(14) A method 100 for depositing a layer of MOF 110 on a substrate 105 is illustrated in FIG. 1. Method 100 can comprise depositing 110 a metal solution onto a substrate, spinning 115 the substrate to spread the metal solution, depositing 120 an organic ligand solution on the substrate, and spinning 125 the substrate to spread the organic ligand solution. The metal solution can comprise a metal ion, such as from transition metals and alkaline earth metals. The metal ion can comprise a divalent metal cation. The divalent metal cation (M.sup.2+) can comprise Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cd and Co. The metal ion can comprise a trivalent metal cation. The trivalent metal cation (M.sup.3+) can comprise Fe, and Al, for example. The organic ligand solution can include polytopic ligands, such as ditopic ligands. Examples include terephthalic acid and its derivatives, such as amino, nitro, and hydroxyl. Other examples include dabco, bipyridine, and pyrazine. Further examples include trivalent embodiments, such as trimesic acid and many other polytopic ligands. The substrate can include alumina, titanium oxide, polymer, copolymer, carbon, metal, or metal oxides.

(15) Depositing 110 and depositing 120 can be accomplished using a syringe, such as a micro syringe, to deposit a drop, such as a micro-drop. A small amount of coating material can be deposited on the center of the substrate, which is either spinning at low speed (such as around 100 rpm) or not spinning at all. The substrate can then be rotated at high speed (such as 500-6000 rpm) in order to spread the coating material by centrifugal force. A machine, such as a spin coater, can be used for spin coating.

(16) Spinning 115 and spinning 125 can occur for an amount of time. An amount of time can be determined based on a time sufficient to spread a metal solution or an organic ligand solution thoroughly across the substrate. Spreading can occur by centrifugal force during spinning. An amount of time can be determined based on a time sufficient to for a metal solution to react with an organic ligand solution. A MOF can form on the substrate as a result of subsequent deposition of a metal solution and an organic ligand solution. One cycle 150 includes depositing 110, spinning 115, depositing 120, and spinning 125. Depositing 110 and spinning 115 can occur before or after depositing 120 and spinning 125. Multiple cycles can be repeated to generate a thicker MOF film. Spinning can be continued while the fluid spins off the edges of the substrate, until the desired thickness of the film is achieved. The applied solvent can be usually volatile, and simultaneously evaporates. So, the higher the angular speed of spinning, the thinner the film. The thickness of the film can also depend on the viscosity and concentration of the solution and the solvent, which can range from about 1-2 nm to about 300-400 nm.

(17) Method 100 can optionally include one or more washing steps. A washing step can comprise depositing a solvent onto the substrate after spinning 115 or spinning 125. Depositing a solvent can comprise depositing a drop of solvent. Examples of solvents include ethanol, methanol, DMF and others. Solvent can optionally be deposited to remove unreacted or unadhered metal solution or organic ligand solution from the substrate. The amount of solvent deposited can depend on the amount of metal solution or organic ligand solution that needs to be removed. With a fully automated spin coating machine, a micro-drop of a metal solution using a micro syringe is placed on the substrate for a certain time, which is rotated at high speed in order to spread the fluid by centrifugal force.

EXAMPLE 1

Spin Coating Fabrication of M.SUB.2.(CH.SUB.3.COO).SUB.4..H.SUB.2.O (M=Cu, Zn) MOFs

(18) Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O and Zn.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O MOFs were grown on gold substrates (200-nm Au/2-nm Ti evaporated on Si wafers) that were at first functionalized by self-assembled monolayers SAMs of 16 mercaptohexadecanoic acid MHDA. These substrates were then placed on a vacuum chuck and subsequently spin coated with 50 l of a 1 mM M.sub.2(CH.sub.3COO).sub.4.H.sub.2O (M=Cu, Zn) ethanol solution for 5 seconds and then with 50 l of a 0.1 mM BDC solution for 5 seconds at room temperature. Critical parameters of the spin coating procedure are spin coating speed (500 rpm), spinning time and injection volume. Typical values of these parameters are 800 rpm, 5 seconds, and 50 l, respectively. Between each step the substrates were washed with solvent. After a careful optimization of the time, concentration, and spinning speed, it was found that the time needed to deposit 100 cycles of thin film took only 50 minutes, as compared to the 72 hours required by the conventional layer-by-layer process and 30 minutes compared to the spray method. While the spin coating method produced a film of equal thickness to a film produced by a spray method over a number of cycles (i.e. 200 nm for 10 cycles), the spin coating method used less solution and further offers the possibility to easily coat larger surfaces. The spin coated films were found to be very stable upon drying and removing of the solventboth on the macro and micro scale and no kind of delamination was observed.

(19) FIG. 2A illustrates out-of-plane X-ray diffraction data (background-corrected) of the Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O SURMOF grown on a COOH terminated SAM after different cycles. Calculated data for Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O is shown for comparison. The diffraction peaks reveal the presence of a crystalline and highly oriented Cu(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O film. Interestingly, although the time to grow this MOF thin film is two orders of magnitude faster than with the conventional LPE-method, the degree of orientation and ordering is comparable.

(20) FIG. 2B illustrates a plot of the Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O SURMOF thickness per growth cycle. This thickness analysis shows the increase of Cu(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O film thickness per deposition cycle, which is much larger than film thickness achieved by LPE deposition processes. These results confirm that the spin coating methods provided herein have a much faster growth rate per cycle than LPE methods.

(21) FIG. 2C illustrates Out-of-plane X-ray diffraction data (background-corrected) of an Zn.sub.2(bdc).xH.sub.2O SURMOF grown on a COOH terminated Au-substrate after 10 cycles in additional to calculated patterns.

(22) The spin coating method was also used to grow MOF thin films on prepatterned substrates, proving the method to be highly selective. SEM images confirmed the deposition of MOF thin films only on COOH-terminated substrate regions, with negligible MOF deposition on CH.sub.3-terminated substrate regions. Before deposition, the SAMs had been laterally patterned via micro-contact printing (CP) method.

EXAMPLE 2

Spin Coating Fabrication of ZIF-8 MOFs Membrane

(23) ZIF-8MOFs were grown on highly porous Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (Cobra Technologies BV) substrates. The support was first washed with water and ethanol and then dried at 150 C. to remove any contaminants from the surface. These substrates were then placed on a vacuum chuck and subsequently spin coated with 50 l of a 2 mM of Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2*6H.sub.2O methanol solution for 5 seconds and then with a 50 l of a 2 mM of 2-Methylimidazole methanol solution for 8 seconds at room temperature. The spin coating procedure used for fabricating the Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O MOF in Example 1 was followed.

(24) In this example, the ZIF-8 the spin coating method was found to be much more efficient than the conventional LPE method, based on 200 growth cycles yielding a thickness of 5 m in about 1.5 hours versus the LPE method which required 150 growth cycles to yield a thickness of 0.6 micrometer in 24 hours.

(25) FIG. 3 illustrates the results of a gas separation study, wherein the permeation of H.sub.2 and CO.sub.2 were tested against the ZIF-8 MOF membrane. A CO.sub.2/H.sub.2 20/80 mixture was tested using a variable pressures-continuous permeate composition analysis technique at 308 K with 2.0 bar as a feed pressure. The variable pressure-continuous permeate composition analysis technique was used to test the gas mixture permeation for the membrane. The permeate gas composition is monitored continuously until the occurrence of the stead state. After an activation process of the membrane with He gas, the binary gas mixture with composition a.sub.up, b.sub.p of interest is applied upstream with a maintained flux at 40-50 cc/min while monitoring the composition of the permeate downstream composition a.sub.down, b.sub.down. The system is considered in a steady state when no change in the signal of the MS is observed

(26) The mixture gas permeation results show that the ZIF-8 thin film shows a selectivity of about 4.6 in favor of H.sub.2.

EXAMPLE 3

Spin Coating Fabrication of HKUST-1 MOFs

(27) The HKUST-1 was grown on activated aluminum substrates (same as ZIF-8). These substrates were then placed on a vacuum chuck and subsequently spin coated with 50 l of a 0.5 mM of Cu.sub.2(CH.sub.3COO).sub.4.H.sub.2O ethanol solution for 5 seconds and then with a 50 l of a 0.2 mM of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid ethanol solution for 10 seconds at room temperature. The spin coating procedure for fabricating the Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.H.sub.2O MOF in Example 1 was followed.

EXAMPLE 4 Spin Coating Fabrication of M.SUB.2.(CH.SUB.3.COO).SUB.4..H.SUB.2.O on QCM Substrates

(28) Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) substrates were coated with Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O MOF using the LPE spin coating approach to test them for sensing application. The Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2. x H.sub.2O SURMOF was spin coated over a COOH functionalized QCM substrate using the spin coating techniques as described in the previous examples. The coated Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O MOF on QCM substrate was tested for an ability to sense NH.sub.3 in humid conditions. The mass uptake for the pure H.sub.2O feed was measured as a reference. As illustrated in FIG. 4, a slow mass uptake is observed. However, in case of the 1% NH.sub.3 in water solution, a very rapid uptake was observed on the QCM, which indicates the high selectivity of this MOF for the NH.sub.3 gas. Despite its similar size, NH.sub.3 showed much faster uptake due to its capability to coordinate stronger to the Cu.sup.2+ atoms of the Cu.sub.2(bdc).sub.2.xH.sub.2O MOF framework.

(29) Embodiments of the present invention include, at least the following:

(30) Embodiment 1. A method of depositing a MOF, comprising: depositing a metal solution onto a substrate; spinning the substrate, sufficient to spread the metal solution; depositing an organic ligand solution onto the substrate; and spinning the substrate, sufficient to spread the organic ligand solution and form a MOF layer. 2. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the metal solution comprises a metal ion or cluster. 3. The method of embodiment 2, wherein the metal ion comprises a divalent metal cation, trivalent metal cation, clusters of a divalent or trivalent metal ions, or combinations thereof. 4. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the organic ligand solution comprises polytypic ligands. 5. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the organic ligand solution comprises one or more of terephthalic acidacid, trimesic acid, dabco, bipyridine, and pyrazine. 6. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the substrate comprises alumina, titanium oxide, polymer, copolymer, carbon, metal, or a metal oxide. 7. The method of embodiment 1, wherein depositing comprises using a syringe to deposit one or more drops. 8. The method of embodiment 1, wherein spinning comprises two or more constant speeds. 9. The method of embodiment 1, further comprising one or more cycles of depositing a metal solution and spinning 10. The method of embodiment 1, further comprising one more cycles of depositing an organic ligand solution and spinning. 11. The method of embodiment 1, further comprising washing after spinning. 12. The method of embodiment 11, wherein washing comprises contacting with a solvent. 13. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the organic ligand solution comprises two or more different polytopic ligands. 14. The method of embodiment 1, further comprising controlling the thin film thickness and orientation.