Method for evaluating exhaust gas simulation
10663444 ยท 2020-05-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F01N2900/0406
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T10/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F01N2900/1402
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
G06F30/23
PHYSICS
International classification
F01N3/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N11/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
G06F30/23
PHYSICS
Abstract
Evaluation method of exhaust gas simulation capable of simply and appropriately evaluating the validity of the simulation is provided. In analysis data, an analysis amplitude curve is calculated in which a change in the concentration of virtual exhaust gas at the observation point in the converged pipe portion is plotted, and an analysis time interval between the zero point and the reference point in the analysis amplitude curve is plotted. In actual measurement data, an actual amplitude curve is provided in which a change in the specific gas component at an observation point is measured with time, and an actual time interval is provided in which a time interval from a zero point to a reference point in the actual amplitude curve. The analysis data is determined as valid when a difference between the analysis time interval and the actual time interval is within a predetermined correlation range.
Claims
1. A method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation, wherein a computer simulation based on a fluid dynamics analysis and an actual measurement are applied to an exhaust gas flow which is a flow of an exhaust gas in an exhaust pipe of an internal combustion engine so as to obtain an analysis data and a measurement data respectively, the exhaust pipe having a converged pipe portion in which a plurality of input pipe portions are converged and a catalyst is disposed, the input pipe portions being respectively connected to a plurality of cylinders of the internal combustion engine; the computer simulation and the actual measurement are applied to the exhaust gas flow in the converged pipe portion, and the analysis data and the measurement data are compared, thereby evaluating a validity of the analysis data, the method comprising steps of: setting, in the analysis data, various conditions including a three-dimensional shaped model of the exhaust pipe, a physical property of a virtual exhaust gas, an inflow time interval of the virtual exhaust gas between the plurality of cylinders in which the virtual exhaust gas successively flows into the input pipe portions at a constant time interval, an inflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an input of the input pipes, and an outflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an output of the converged pipe portion; determining any of cylinders in the plurality of cylinders to be a specific cylinder and the input pipe portion connected to the specific cylinder to be a specific input portion; dividing the area of the exhaust pipe into a plurality of finite elements; setting, when calculating transfer of the virtual exhaust gas between the finite elements, identification information to identify a virtual exhaust gas flowing into the finite elements of the specific input pipe portion from the specific cylinder, and a virtual exhaust gas flowing into the finite elements of the rest of input pipe portions excluding the specific input pipe portion from the rest of the cylinders excluding the specific cylinder; calculating an analysis amplitude curve representing a change in concentration of the virtual exhaust gas with time at an observation finite element in the observation point of the converged pipe portion, the virtual exhaust gas being exhausted from the specific cylinder to the exhaust pipe, and an analysis time interval representing a time interval from a zero point relative to the time course during the computer simulation to the reference point in the analysis amplitude curve; setting, in the measurement data, an air-fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders excluding the specific cylinder to be within a predetermined range and an air-fuel ratio of the specific cylinder to be beyond the predetermined range; measuring, for the exhaust gas exhausted to the exhaust pipe from the specific cylinder during a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine, a change in the specific gas component with time at the observation point of the converged pipe portion, thereby obtaining an actual amplitude curve; calculating a time interval from a zero point in the measuring to a reference point in the actual amplitude curve to obtain an actual time interval; and determining that the analysis data is valid, when a difference between the analysis time interval and the actual time interval is within a predetermined correlation range.
2. A method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation, wherein a computer simulation based on a fluid dynamics analysis and an actual measurement are applied to an exhaust gas flow which is a flow of an exhaust gas in an exhaust pipe of an internal combustion engine so as to obtain an analysis data and a measurement data respectively, the exhaust pipe having a converged pipe portion in which a plurality of input pipe portions are converged and a catalyst is disposed, the input pipe portions being respectively connected to a plurality of cylinders of the internal combustion engine; the computer simulation and the actual measurement are applied to the exhaust gas in the converged pipe portion, and the analysis data and the measurement data are compared, thereby evaluating a validity of the analysis data, the method comprising steps of: setting, in the analysis data, various conditions including a three-dimensional shaped model of the exhaust pipe, a physical property of a virtual exhaust gas, an inflow time interval of the virtual exhaust gas between the plurality of cylinders in which the virtual exhaust gas successively flows into the input pipe portions at a constant time interval, an inflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an input of the input pipes, and an outflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an output of the converged pipe portion; determining any of two cylinders in the plurality of cylinders to be a first specific cylinder and a second specific cylinder, the input pipe portion connected to the first specific cylinder to be a first specific input portion and the input pipe portion connected to the second specific cylinder to be a second specific input portion; dividing the area of the exhaust pipe into a plurality of finite elements; setting, when calculating transfer of the virtual exhaust gas between the finite elements, identification information to mutually identify a virtual exhaust gas flowing into the finite elements of the first specific input pipe portion from the first specific cylinder, a virtual exhaust gas flowing into the finite elements of the second specific input pipe portion from the second specific cylinder, a virtual exhaust gas flowing into the finite elements of the rest of input pipe portions excluding the first and second specific input pipe portions from the rest of the cylinders excluding the first and second specific cylinders; calculating a first analysis amplitude curve representing a change in concentration of a first virtual exhaust gas with time at an observation finite element in the observation point of the converged pipe portion, the first virtual exhaust gas being exhausted from the first specific cylinder to the exhaust pipe, a second analysis amplitude curve representing a change in concentration of a second virtual exhaust gas with time at an observation finite element in the observation point of the converged pipe portion, the second virtual exhaust gas being exhausted from the second specific cylinder to the exhaust pipe, and an analysis time interval representing a time interval from a reference point in the first analysis amplitude curve to a reference point in the second analysis amplitude curve; setting, when obtaining the measurement data, an air-fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders excluding the first specific cylinder to be within a predetermined range and an air-fuel ratio of the first specific cylinder to be beyond the predetermined range; measuring, for the exhaust gas exhausted to the exhaust pipe from the first specific cylinder during a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine, a change in the specific gas component with time at the observation point of the converged pipe portion, thereby obtaining a first actual amplitude curve; setting, when obtaining the measurement data, an air-fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders excluding the second specific cylinder to be within a predetermined range and an air-fuel ratio of the second specific cylinder to be beyond the predetermined range; measuring, for the exhaust gas exhausted to the exhaust pipe from the second specific cylinder during a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine, a change in the specific gas component with time at the observation point of the converged pipe portion, thereby obtaining a second actual amplitude curve; combining the first actual amplitude curve and the second actual amplitude curve when zero points between the first and second amplitude curves are aligned, and obtaining, as an actual time interval, a time interval from a reference point of the first actual amplitude curve to a reference point of the second actual amplitude curve; and determining that the analysis data is valid, when a difference between the analysis time interval and the actual time interval is within a predetermined correlation range.
3. A method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation, wherein a computer simulation based on a fluid dynamics analysis and an actual measurement are applied to an exhaust gas flow which is a flow of an exhaust gas in an exhaust pipe of an internal combustion engine so as to obtain an analysis data and a measurement data respectively, the exhaust pipe having a converged pipe portion in which a plurality of input pipe portions are converged and a catalyst is disposed, the input pipe portions being respectively connected to a plurality of cylinders of the internal combustion engine; the computer simulation and the actual measurement are applied to the exhaust gas in the converged pipe portion, and the analysis data and the measurement data are compared, thereby evaluating a validity of the analysis data, the method comprising steps of: setting, in the analysis data, various conditions including a three-dimensional shaped model of the exhaust pipe, a physical property of a virtual exhaust gas, an inflow time interval of the virtual exhaust gas between the plurality of cylinders in which the virtual exhaust gas successively flows into the input pipe portions at a constant time interval, an inflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an input of the input pipes, and an outflow boundary condition of the virtual exhaust gas at an output of the converged pipe portion; determining any of cylinders in the plurality of cylinders to be a specific cylinder and the input pipe portion connected to the specific cylinder to be a specific input portion; dividing the area of the exhaust pipe into a plurality of finite elements; setting, when calculating transfer of the virtual exhaust gas between the finite elements, identification information to mutually identify each of virtual exhaust gasses flowing into respective finite elements corresponding to a plurality of input pipe portions from respective cylinders; calculating, for the respective cylinders, analysis amplitude curves representing a change in concentration of the virtual exhaust gasses with time at an observation finite element in the observation point of the converged pipe portion, the virtual exhaust gasses being exhausted from the respective cylinders to the exhaust pipe, and analysis time intervals representing time intervals between mutually adjacent reference points in the analysis amplitude curves for respective cylinders; setting, in the measurement data, an air-fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders excluding a specific cylinder selected from the plurality of cylinders to be within a predetermined range and an air-fuel ratio of the specific cylinder to be beyond the predetermined range; measuring, for the exhaust gas exhausted to the exhaust pipe from the specific cylinder during a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine, a change in the specific gas component with time at the observation point of the converged pipe portion, and determining the change in the specific gas component as actual amplitude curves; measuring the actual amplitude curves for respective cylinders under a condition that each of the cylinders is sequentially set as the specific cylinder; combining the measured actual amplitude curves when zero points between the measured actual amplitude curves are aligned, and obtaining, as actual time intervals for respective cylinders, time intervals between mutually adjacent reference points in the measured actual amplitude curves for respective cylinders; and determining that the analysis data is valid, when a difference between the analysis time interval and the actual time interval for respective cylinders is within a predetermined correlation range.
4. The method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to claim 1, wherein the fluid dynamics analysis includes an analysis for an exhaust gas flow based on finite volume method.
5. The method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to claim 1, wherein the analysis data is obtained in a temperature range in which a catalyst in the exhaust pipe does not cause chemical reaction, or the analysis data is obtained assuming that the catalyst in the exhaust pipe does not perform chemical reaction; and the measurement data is measured in a temperature range in which the catalyst in the exhaust pipe does not cause chemical reaction, measured under a state where the catalyst in the exhaust pipe does not cause chemical reaction, or measured under a state where the observation point is disposed in an upstream side of an exhaust gas flow compared to a position of the catalyst in the converged pipe portion.
6. The method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to claim 1, wherein the actual amplitude curve is formed such that a change in the concentration of the specific gas component is averaged for a plurality of periods, as a single period data.
7. The method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to claim 2, wherein the reference point of the first actual amplitude curve to the reference point of the second actual amplitude curve are set as peak points or bottom points; and the peak points or the bottom points of the actual amplitude curves are determined as points where gradient per unit of time of the actual amplitude curve become 0.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the accompanying drawings:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(25) With reference to the drawings, preferred embodiments of the above-described a method for evaluating exhaust gas simulation will be described.
First Embodiment
(26) As shown in
(27) For the analysis data DS, as shown in
(28) Moreover, as shown in
(29) In the actual measurement data DM, as shown in
(30) Hereinafter, an evaluation method of the exhaust gas simulation according to the present embodiment will be described in detail. As shown in
(31) As shown in
(32) In the simulation S, objects of the exhaust pipe 2 from which the analysis data DS is generated, may be the exhaust manifold 24 and the catalyst converter 25, and the exhaust manifold 24, the catalyst converter 25 and the exhaust pipe 26. The exhaust manifold 24 is configured of a plurality of input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D and the converged pipe portion 23. The catalyst converter 25 and the exhaust pipe 26 are configured of the converged pipe 23.
(33) [Configuration of Simulation S and Generation of Analysis Data DS]
(34) The simulation S can be provided as a software operated on an operation system of the analysis computer 3. The CFD analysis used for the simulation S according to the present embodiment includes an analysis of the flow of the exhaust gas G based on the finite volume method. The method used for the CFD analysis includes finite differential method, finite element Y method and the like, other than the finite volume method. The finite volume method has both features of the finite differential method and the finite element method, and thus suitable for the CFD analysis. The finite volume method may also be referred to as numerical fluid dynamics analysis.
(35) For the software for the simulation according to the present embodiment, Star-CCM+ of Siemens is employed. Other than this software, ANSYS FLUENT produced by ANSYS, Inc., icon-CFD produced by IDAJ Co., LTD., STREAM produced by Software Cradle Co., Ltd, PHOENICS produced by Concentration Heat and Momentum Limited or the like can be employed.
(36) According to the simulation S using the finite volume method, Navier-Stokes equation, equation of continuity, equation of energy or the like are used to calculate the transfer of the virtual exhaust gas Gs, for the plurality of finite elements Y in the exhaust pipe 2. The Navier-Stokes equation is expressed as, for example, {V/t+.Math.(v v)}=+.Math.(2D). The equation of continuity is expressed as, for example, .Math.v=0. The equation of energy is expressed as, for example, (CT)/t+.Math.(vCT)=.Math.(kT).
(37) Here, (der) represents partial derivative of multivariable function, and nebula represents the operator for vector analysis. Also, represents concentration, v represents velocity of the flow, t represents time, represents viscosity coefficient, D represents deformation velocity tensor, C represents specific heat, T represents temperature, and k represents thermal conductivity.
(38) In the simulation S, when calculating transfer of the virtual exhaust gas Gs between the finite elements Y, various conditions are set for respective equations in the finite volume method. The physical property value S1 of the includes the concentration of the virtual exhaust gas Gs, the viscosity coefficient, the specific heat, the thermal conductivity, and the temperature. The virtual exhaust gas Gs is defined such that the exhaust gas G is treated as a virtual fluid without considering the content of the gas. The virtual exhaust gas Gs according to the present embodiment is treated as incompressible fluid for making the calculation simple. However, the virtual exhaust gas may be treated as compressible gas.
(39) As shown in
(40) The inflow boundary condition S2 of the virtual exhaust Gs at the input 211 of the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D is given as a flow velocity (amount of flowing) or pressure of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the input 211 of respective input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D. The outflow boundary condition S3 of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23 is given as a flow velocity (amount of velocity) or pressure of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23. The output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23 can be set at an appropriate position in an upstream side or a downstream side of the catalyst 22 disposed in the converged pipe portion 23, other than the most downstream end of the converged pipe 23.
(41) Various conditions when calculating the analysis data DS are compared with respective values when acquiring the actual measurement data DM, where the various conditions includes physical property value S1 such as the concentration, viscosity coefficient, the specific heat, the thermal conductivity and the temperature, the inflow time interval T of the virtual between the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, the flow velocity or the pressure of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the input 211 of respective input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D, and the flow velocity or pressure of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23.
(42) As shown
(43) The identification information S4 is used to distinguish an exhaust gas G exhausted to the specific input pipe from the specific cylinder which is any one of the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, from an exhaust gas G exhausted to the rest of the input pipes from the rest of the cylinders. The specific cylinder and the specific input pipe may be selected from any of the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, and any of the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D.
(44) The identification information S4 is set such that data is added to the virtual exhaust gas Gs in the simulation S. The identification information S4 is added to the finite elements Y existing in the positions at which the virtual exhaust gas Gs flows into the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D from the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, and sequentially kept at respective finite elements Y of the input pipe and the converged pipe positioned in downstream side of the flow of the virtual exhaust gas Gs than the finite elements Y to which the identification information S4 is added. Specifically, in the respective finite elements Y of the converged pipe portions, the virtual exhaust gas Gs flowing into the respective finite elements Y is identified whether the source of the virtual exhaust gas Gs belongs to which cylinder and which input pipe. Also, the virtual exhaust gas Gs from the plurality of cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D are mixed through the input pipes and flows into the respective finite elements Y. In this case, taking the ratio of the flow between the virtual exhaust gasses Gs of which the sources are different into consideration, the transfer of the virtual exhaust gas Gs between the finite elements Y is calculated.
(45) As shown in
(46) The input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D of the exhaust manifold 24 are connected to a plurality of cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D of the internal combustion engine 1, respectively. Depending on positions in the vehicle or the like, where the internal combustion engine 1 and the exhaust pipe 2 are installed, and the way of installing them, the lengths and shapes of the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D are likely to be different from each other. The specific cylinder used for analysis data DS and the specific cylinder of the actual measurement data DM are determined by identifying which position the cylinder is present in the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D of the internal combustion engine 1.
(47) As shown in
(48) The zero point t0 in the time course during the simulation S can be set as any specific rotational angle , where the rotational angle of the crank shaft 12 of the internal combustion engine 1 rotates by 720 in the one cycle. The zero point t0 according to the present embodiment is defined as a time at which the rotational angle of the crank shaft angle is 0. The zero point t0 in the time course in the simulation S and the zero point t0 in the time course in the actual measurement are synchronized by using the rotational angle of the crank shaft 12.
(49) As shown in
(50) The analysis time interval TS used for the analysis data DS is calculated as a time interval between the zero point t0 in the time course and the reference point is in the analysis amplitude curve KS. The time interval is defined reflecting the result of the simulation S calculated using the concentration and a change in the fluid velocity of the specific virtual exhaust gas Gs appearing at the observation point X of the converged pipe portion 23.
(51) [Calculation of Actual Measurement Data DM]
(52) As shown in
(53) In the case where the air/fuel ratio is set to rich side in which an amount of the fuel is larger than that of the air compared to the theoretical air/fuel ratio, concentration of unburnt gas exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 such as CO (i.e., carbon monoxide) and HC (i.e., hydrocarbon) become higher. On the other hand, in the case where the air/fuel ratio is set to the lean side in which an amount of the fuel is smaller than that of the air compared to the theoretical air/fuel ratio, concentration of NOx (nitrogen oxides), oxygen or the like which are exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 becomes higher.
(54) According to the present embodiment, when operating a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine 1, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders are set to be different from each other such that the ratio of fuel supplied to the specific cylinder is set to be larger than the ratio of the fuel supplied to the rest of the cylinders. More specifically, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder is set to be rich side and the air/fuel ratios of the rest of the cylinders are set to be the theoretical air/fuel ratio. The air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders are set to be the same within a predetermined allowable error range. The allowable error range is defined as a case where an error of the air/fuel ratio is within 5%. The concentration of the specific gas component which are actually measured is determined as CO concentration. Also, the concentration of the specific gas component which is actually measured may be HC concentration.
(55) During a combustion operation of the internal combustion engine 1, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders are set to be different from each other such that the ratio of fuel supplied to the specific cylinder is set to be smaller than the ratio of the fuel supplied to the rest of the cylinders. In this case, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder can be set to the lean side and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders can be set to the theoretical air/fuel ratio. In this case, the concentration of the specific gas component which are actually measured can be NOx concentration, oxygen concentration or the like. A predetermined range in which the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder is set and a predetermined range in which the air/fuel ratio corresponding to the rest of the cylinders are set, can be determined such that a change in the concentration of the specific gas component contained in the exhaust gas G significantly appears.
(56) As shown in
(57) Then, the gas analyzer 41 measures concentration of the specific gas component at the observation position X of the converged pipe portion 23 at a predetermined sampling interval. Then, a change in the concentration of the specific gas component over time is stored in the measurement computer 4 as the actual amplitude curve KM. The actual amplitude curve KM is obtained as a curve which repeatedly increases or decreases the amplitude that represents amount of concentration of the specific gas component in the exhaust gas G in response to the combustion cycle TA. The measurement computer 4 may be different from the analysis computer 3 or the same as the analysis computer 3.
(58) As shown in
(59) The actual measurement time interval TM used as the actual measurement data DM is calculated as a time interval from the actual measurement zero point t0 to the reference point tm in the actual amplitude curve KM. The actual measurement time interval TM changes depending on the concentration and the flow velocity of the specific gas component which appears at the observation point X of the converged pipe portion 23.
(60) When actually measuring concentration of the specific gas component in the internal combustion engine 1, the flow velocity or the pressure of the exhaust gas G as the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the input 211 of the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D which are used for calculating the analysis data DS, and the flow velocity or the pressure of the exhaust gas G as the virtual exhaust gas GS at the output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23 which are used for calculating the analysis data DS, are actually measured or calculated. The flow velocity or the pressure of the exhaust gas G can be simply obtained by an air flow meter provided in the internal combustion engine to measure an amount of the intake air flowing into the plurality of cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D. Further, when actually measuring concentration of the specific gas component in the internal combustion engine 1, the temperature of the exhaust gas G which are used when calculating the analysis data DS is actually measured. Parameters used for calculating the analysis data DS such as density, viscosity coefficient, specific heat and thermal conductivity can be determined based on data accumulated in the past, or may be actually measured instead.
(61) As shown in
(62) In the simulation S, if the structure of the catalyst carrier having many vent holes is divided into each finite element by modeling, a lot of time is required. Hence, in the simulation S, whole catalyst 22 is replaced to a single resistor as a base having a predetermined size in which inertia coefficient and viscosity coefficient are set, thereby modeling the catalyst 22. The method of modelling is sometimes referred to as porous media method. Thus, simulation S can readily be performed. Further, the catalyst 22 in the actual equipment when acquiring actual measurement data DM can be fitted to the shape of the resistor of the catalyst 22 in the simulation S.
(63) When acquiring the actual measurement data DM in the actual equipment, if noble metal particles are carried by catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 22, specific gas component in the exhaust gas G chemically react with others because of catalyst effect of the noble metal particle. In the case where the observation point X is positioned in downstream side of flow of the exhaust gas G with respect to the catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 2, this chemical reaction influences the concentration of the specific has component which is actually measured. Then, the analysis data DS is calculated assuming that no chemical reaction occurs on the catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 22. The actual measurement data DM is actually measured under a state where the catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 2 causes no chemical reaction.
(64) Specifically, the catalyst 2 in the exhaust pipe 2 of the actual equipment may be, as a dummy catalyst, a catalyst carrier in which no noble metal particles are carried thereby. Note that y alumina or the like can be carried by the catalyst carrier so as to make a pressure loss in the dummy catalyst to be similar to a pressure loss in the actual catalyst. Assuming that no chemical reaction occurs on the catalyst 22, a change in concentration of the specific gas component in the exhaust gas G can be accurately measured over time, so that accuracy of evaluating the analysis data DS can be improved by the actual measurement data DM.
(65) Also, temperature at which the noble metal particles in the catalyst 22 is capable of reacting with CO, HC, NOx or the like as catalytic action is a predetermined temperature or more, for example 300 C. or more. In this respect, the analysis data DS is obtained in a temperature range in which the catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 2 does not cause chemical reaction, and the actual measurement data DM can be measured in a temperature range in which the catalyst 22 in the exhaust pipe 2 does not cause chemical reaction. Also, in this case, accuracy of evaluating the analysis data using the actual measurement data can be improved.
(66) In the case where the observation point C is located in the upstream side of the flow of the exhaust gas G than the position where the catalyst 22 in the converged pipe 23, chemical reaction occurring in the catalyst 22 rarely influences the actual measurement of the concentration of specific gas component at the observation point X. In this case, it is not necessary to obtain actual measurement data, by causing the catalyst 22 not to cause chemical reaction.
(67) [Correlation]
(68) As shown in
(69) The analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM has positive correlation. When calculating the regression curve for the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM, the predetermined correlation range is determined such that the coefficient of determination R.sup.2 is 0.8 or more where a correlation coefficient is R. In this case, when the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM are completely the same value, the coefficient of determination R.sup.2 becomes 1. When comparing the average value of the analysis data DS and the average value of the actual measurement data DM, the predetermined correlation range can be defined such that a difference between the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM is within 10%, for example.
(70) The lengths of each input pipe portions 21A, 21B, 21C, 21D and the converged pipe portion 23, a cross-sectional area, a cross-sectional shape, entire shape of the exhaust pipe 2, influence the velocity distribution and the concentration distribution of the exhaust gas G in the converged pipe portion 23. The analysis time interval TS and the actual time interval TM are calculated or measured as a value offset from the inflow time interval T set in the analysis data DS or the actual measurement data DM, reflecting a change in the concentration of the virtual exhaust gas Gs or the concentration of the specific gas component G over time.
(71) Accordingly, by checking/comparing between the analysis time interval TS and the actual measurement time interval TM, it can be confirmed whether or not parameters of the simulation S such as the flow velocity distribution and the concentration distribution of the virtual exhaust gas Gs in the converged pipe portion 23 is reflected to the same parameters of the actual measurement, i.e., the flow velocity distribution and the concentration distribution. Therefore, when the difference between the analysis time interval TS and the actual measurement time interval TM is within a predetermined correlation range, it is determined that the analysis data DS according to the simulation S correctly expresses the flow velocity distribution and the concentration distribution of the exhaust gas G in the converged pipe 23 with a predetermined accuracy.
(72) (Effects and Advantages)
(73) According to the analysis data DS, the identification information S4 is employed. Hence, the configuration can determine which cylinder exhausts the virtual exhaust gas Gs that reaches the observation point X of the converged pipe portion 23. On the other hand, in the actual measurement data DM, in order to determine a cylinder from which the exhaust gas G is exhausted and reached to the observation point X of the converged pipe portion 23, special method is required.
(74) Accordingly, when calculating the actual measurement time interval TM in the actual measurement data DM, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of cylinders are set to be different from each other. The difference of the air/fuel ratios influences the concentration of specific gas components contained in the exhaust gas G, such as NOx (nitrogen oxides), CO (carbon monoxide), HC (hydrocarbon), oxygen or the like. According to the present embodiment, the air/fuel ratio of the specific cylinder is set to rich side and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders are set to the theoretical air/fuel ratio, whereby the concentration of the exhaust gas G exhausted from the specific cylinder becomes significant higher than CO concentration of the exhaust gas G exhausted from the rest of the cylinders. Therefore, a change in the CO concentration of the exhausted gas G over time which is actually measured at the observation point X in the converged pipe 23 can be identified as a change in the CO concentration over time, which is contained in the exhausted gas G exhausted from the specific cylinder.
(75) Thus, in the actual equipment of the internal combustion engine 1, substantially, actual time interval TM can be calculated based on the actual amplitude curve KM that represents a change in the concentration of the exhaust gas G over time, which is exhausted from the specific cylinder. Hence, the analysis time interval TS calculated for the specific cylinder and the actual time interval TM can be compared accurately.
(76) The result of the simulation S based on the computational fluid dynamics analysis using the analysis computer 3 is appropriately evaluated by using the actual equipment. However, the evaluation method thereof has not been established. According to the evaluation method of the exhaust gas simulation of the present embodiment, a target of the simulation S is specific, that is, a gas flow of the exhaust gas G in the converged pipe portion 23 of the exhaust pipe 2 of the internal combustion engine. In this respect, by focusing on a fact that the internal combustion engine 1 has a plurality of cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, and the exhaust gas G is sequentially exhausted to the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D, a state of the exhaust gas G in any of the cylinders is set to be different from a state of the exhaust gas G in the rest of the cylinders, and a change in the concentration of the specific gas component is observed for the exhaust gas G exhausted from any of the cylinders. Thus, the result of simulation S can be simply and appropriately evaluated or verified by using the actual equipment.
(77) The actual measurement data DM is acquired in the actual equipment of the internal combustion engine 1 by actually measuring a change in the concentration of a specific gas component in the exhaust gas G and not by measuring a change in the flow velocity of the exhaust gas G. In the case where the flow velocity of the exhaust gas G is actually measured, two detecting portions are required to be disposed in an upper stream side and a downstream side in the exhaust pipe 2, thereby measuring a time delay in a state change of the fluid between the pair of detecting portions. In this case, functions of radiating and detecting light are required for equipment of measuring the flow velocity so that the size of the equipment is likely to increase. Hence, it is difficult to dispose the equipment in such a complexed shaped portion in the exhaust pipe portion 2. When it is assumed that the flow velocity of the exhaust gas G is actually measured at a portion where turbulence, countercurrent or the like is being occurred in the vicinity of the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D of the exhaust manifold, the accuracy thereof would be lowered.
(78) On the other hand, according to the method for acquiring the actual measurement data DM described in the present embodiment, instead of using equipment for measuring the flow velocity, a gas analyzer 41 capable of measuring concentration of CO as a specific gas component. As the gas analyzer 41, for example, a fast response gas analyzer 41 HFR500 or the like which is manufactured by Cambustion Limited can be used. The shape of a measurement probe of the gas analyzer 411 is small so that this measurement probe 41 can be mounted to respective portions in the exhaust pipe 2. Further, since concentration of CO or the like is measured, the actual measurement can be accomplished, without lowering the measurement accuracy, even in the portions where turbulence, countercurrent or the like occurs. When acquiring the actual measurement data DM, a gas analyzer 41 having lower time resolution.
(79) As described, according to the method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation, validity of analysis data DS in accordance with the simulation S can be simply and appropriately evaluated.
Second Embodiment
(80) In the method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to the second embodiment, instead of acquiring the time intervals TS and TM for the analysis data DS and actual measurement data DM, which are defined as time intervals from the zero point t0 relative to the time course to the reference points is and tm of respective amplitude curves KS and KM, as shown in
(81) When calculating the analysis data DS of the present embodiment, any two cylinders among the plurality of cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D of the internal combustion engine 1 are identified as a first specific cylinder and the second specific cylinder. An input pipe connected to the first specific cylinder is defined as a first specific input pipe and an input pipe connected to the second specific cylinder is defined as a second specific input pipe. The identification information S4 in the analysis data DS is set to distinguish the virtual exhaust gas Gs flowing into respective finite elements of the first specific input pipe from the first specific cylinder, the virtual exhaust gas Gs flowing into respective finite elements of the second specific input pipe from the second specific cylinder, the virtual exhaust gas Gs flowing into respective finite elements of the input pipes excluding the first and second specific input pipes from the cylinders excluding the first and second specific cylinders. The first specific cylinder and the first specific input pipe and the second specific cylinder and the second specific input pipe may be any of cylinder among the cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D and any of input pipe among the input pipes 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D.
(82) As shown in
(83) According to the present embodiment, two cylinders at which subsequent combustion strokes are executed are defined as the first specific cylinder and the second specific cylinder. The first and second cylinders may be set as two cylinders at which combustion strokes are executed between combustion strokes executed by another cylinders.
(84) On the other hand, as shown in
(85) Next, the internal combustion engine 1 is operated as a combustion operation to actually measure the CO concentration as a specific gas component, under a condition in which the air/fuel ratio of the second specific cylinder is set to be on the rich side and the air/fuel ratio of the rest of the cylinders excluding the second specific cylinder is set to be the theoretical air/fuel ratio. At this time, the gas analyzer 41 actually measures concentration of the specific gas component at the observation point X of the converged pipe portion 23 in the exhaust pipe 2. Since only the air/fuel ratio of the second specific cylinder is set to be on the rich side, the concentration of the specific gas component in the exhaust gas G which is actually measured by the gas analyzer 41 can be identified as concentration of the specific gas component in the exhaust gas G exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the second specific cylinder. Also, the concentration of the specific gas component is measured at predetermined sampling intervals, and a change in the concentration of the specific gas component is defined as a second actual amplitude curve KM2.
(86) Subsequently, as shown in
(87) Subsequently, similar to that of the first embodiment, the analysis data DS is determined as valid when the difference between the analysis time interval TS and the actual time interval TM is within a predetermined correlation range. According to the present embodiment, the analysis time interval TS calculated based on the concentration of the virtual exhaust gas GS of two cylinders and the actual time interval TM calculated based on the concentration of the specific gas components of two cylinders are compared, thereby evaluating validity of the analysis data DS. Hence, the flow velocity distribution and the concentration distribution of the exhaust gas G in the exhaust pipe 2 can be more reflected to the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM, so that accuracy of evaluating the validity of the analysis data DS can be improved.
(88) In the method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to the present embodiment, elements having the same reference numbers as the first embodiment and other embodiments are the same as that of the first embodiment, and similar operational effects of the first embodiment can be obtained.
Third Embodiment
(89) As shown in
(90) The identification information S4 in the analysis data DS of the present embodiment is set such that the virtual exhaust gasses entering respective finite elements Y of the four input pipe portions 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D from the four cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D are distinguished from each other. Specifically, the identification information S4 is set to mutually distinguish the virtual exhaust gas Gs entering respective finite elements Y of the first input pipe portion 21A from the first cylinder 11A, the virtual exhaust gas Gs entering respective finite elements Y of the second input pipe portion 21B from the second cylinder 11B, the virtual exhaust gas Gs entering respective finite elements Y of the third input pipe portion 21C from the third cylinder 11C, and the virtual exhaust gas Gs entering respective finite elements Y of the fourth input pipe portion 21D from the fourth cylinder 11D.
(91) Also, as shown in
(92) Specifically, the first cylinder 11A is defined as the specific cylinder, and a change in concentration of a first virtual exhaust gas Gs observed at the observation finite element YX is calculated as a first analysis amplitude curve KS1 corresponding to the cylinder 11A, in which the first virtual exhaust gas Gs is exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the cylinder 11A. Also, the second cylinder 11B is defined as the specific cylinder, and a change in concentration of a second virtual exhaust gas Gs observed at the observation finite element YX is calculated as a second analysis amplitude curve KS2 corresponding to the cylinder 11B, in which the second virtual exhaust gas Gs is exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the cylinder 11B. The third cylinder 11C is defined as the specific cylinder, and a change in concentration of a third virtual exhaust gas Gs observed at the observation finite element YX is calculated as a third analysis amplitude curve KS3 corresponding to the cylinder 11C, in which the third virtual exhaust gas Gs is exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the cylinder 11C. Likewise, fourth cylinder 11D is defined as the specific cylinder, and a change in concentration of a fourth virtual exhaust gas Gs observed at the observation finite element YX is calculated as a fourth analysis amplitude curve KS3 corresponding to the cylinder 11D, in which the fourth virtual exhaust gas Gs is exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the cylinder 11D.
(93) Then, time intervals between mutually adjacent reference points ts1, ts2, ts3 and ts4 in the analysis amplitude curve KS1, KS2, KS3 and KS4 corresponding to the respective cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D are determined as the analysis time intervals TS1, TS2, TS3 and TS4. Specifically, a time interval between the reference point ts1 in the first analysis amplitude curve KS1 and the reference point ts2 in the second analysis amplitude curve KS2 is determined as a first analysis time interval TS1. Also, a time interval between the reference point ts2 in the second analysis amplitude curve KS2 and the reference point ts3 in the third analysis amplitude curve KS3 is determined as a second analysis time interval TS2. Further, a time interval between the reference point ts3 in the third analysis amplitude curve KS3 and the reference point ts4 in the fourth analysis amplitude curve KS4 is determined as a third analysis time interval TS3. Moreover, a time interval between the reference point ts4 in the fourth analysis amplitude curve KS4 and the reference point ts1 in the first analysis amplitude curve KS1 is determined as a fourth analysis time interval TS4. Each reference point ts1, ts2, ts3 and ts4 can be the peak point, the bottom point and the center of the deviation.
(94) On the other hand, as shown in
(95) To measure actual CO concentration as the specific gas component, the air/fuel ratio of the first cylinder 11A is set as the specific cylinder and set the air/fuel ration thereof to be rich side, and the air/fuel ratio of rest of the cylinders are set to be the theoretical air/fuel ratio, and combustion operation of the internal combustion engine 1 is performed. At this time, the gas analyzer 41 is used to measure actual CO concentration at the observation point X of the converged pipe portion in the exhaust pipe 2. Since the air/fuel ratio is set to be rich side only for the first cylinder 11A, the concentration of the specific gas component actually measured by the gas analyzer 41 can be identified as concentration of a specific gas component in the exhaust gas G exhausted to the exhaust pipe 2 from the first cylinder 11A. Further, concentration of the specific gas component is measured at predetermined sampling intervals, and a change in the concentration of the specific gas component is determined as the first actual amplitude curve KM1.
(96) As shown in
(97) Next, a graph on which the first actual amplitude curve KM1 is shown, a graph on which the second actual amplitude curve KM2 is shown, a graph on which the third actual amplitude curve KM3 is shown, and a graph on which the fourth actual amplitude curve KM4 is shown are combined with the zero points t0 relative to the time course for each of the actual amplitude curves aligned. At this point, in the graph where four actual amplitude curves KM1, KM2, KM3 and KM4 are combined, a concentration peak of the specific gas component in the first actual amplitude curve KM1, a concentration peak of the specific gas component in the second actual amplitude curve KM2, a concentration peak of the specific gas component in the third actual amplitude curve KM3, and a concentration peak of the specific gas component in the fourth actual amplitude curve KM4, are displaced from each other relative to the time axis.
(98) Then, as shown in
(99) Then, the process determines that the analysis data DS is valid, when the difference between the analysis time interval TS1 to TS4 and the actual time intervals TM1 to TM4 corresponding to the cylinders 11A to 11D is within a predetermined correlation range. According to the present embodiment, the process determines that analysis data DS is valid when a difference between the first analysis time interval TS1 and the first actual time interval TM1, a difference between the second analysis time interval TS2 and the second actual time interval TM2, a difference between the third analysis time interval TS3 and the third actual time interval TM3, and a difference between the fourth analysis time interval TS4 and the fourth actual time interval TM4 are within a predetermined correlation range.
(100) According to the present embodiment, validity of the analysis data DS is evaluated by comparing the analysis time intervals TS1 to TS4 which are calculated based on the concentration of the virtual exhaust gas Gs in all cylinders, and the actual time intervals TM1 to TM4 calculated based on the concentration of the specific gas component of the all cylinders. Therefore, the flow velocity distribution and the concentration distribution of the exhaust gas G in the exhaust pipe 2 can be more reflected to the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM, so that accuracy of evaluating the validity of the analysis data DS can be improved.
(101) In the method for evaluating an exhaust gas simulation according to the present embodiment, elements having the same reference numbers as the first embodiment and other embodiments are the same as that of the first embodiment, and similar operational effects of the first embodiment can be obtained.
(102) <Confirmation Test>
(103) In the confirmation test, with the evaluation method of the exhaust simulation described in the third embodiment, the analysis data DS and the actual measurement data DM are obtained and the validity of the analysis data DS was evaluated. As shown in
(104) For the software that performs the simulation S, Star-CCM+ produced by Siemens. For the actual equipment of the internal combustion engine 1, 2AR-FE (displacement: 2.493 litter) engine manufactured by Toyota Motor, which is an in-line four-cylinder reciprocating engine, was used. As the physical property value S1 of the virtual exhaust gas Gs in the analysis data DS, a density of 0.424 (kg/m.sup.3), viscosity coefficient of 9.1410.sup.5 (Pa/s), specific heat of 1.118 (J/gK), thermal conductivity of 0.0613 (W/mK), and temperature of 560 C. are used to conform to data of the actual equipment.
(105) The flow velocity of the virtual exhaust gas Gs at the input 211 of the input pipe portions 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D is 4.625 (m/s) and the pressure of the virtual exhaust gas Gs in the output 231 of the converged pipe portion 23 is 1.725 (kPa). The inflow time interval T that represents the interval for performing the combustion strokes in the respective cylinders 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D is set to be 20 (ms). These values are the same as that of the actual equipment. ms represents 10.sup.3 s, i.e., millisecond.
(106) The catalyst 22 disposed in the exhaust pipe 2 is composed of a single resistor having a size of 103 mm105 mm, with 26.233 (kg/m.sup.4) of inertia coefficient of the resistor, and 747.12 (kg.Math.s/m.sup.3) of viscosity coefficient of the resistor. Note that metal particles are not supported by the resistor.
(107)
(108) Referring to
(109)
(110) In
(111)
(112) With reference to
(113) According to the present confirmation test, an amount of flow of the virtual exhaust gas Gs flowing into respective input pipe portions 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D and the rotational speed of the crank shaft 12 of the internal combustion engine 1 are appropriately changed, and each of the analysis time intervals of data DS and the actual measurement time intervals of the actual measurement data are obtained for plurality of times. The result of the test is shown in table 1 as follows.
(114) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Analysis (Measurement) Measurement time interval Analysis data data First data 1st to 3rd 16 23 3rd to 4th 30 24 4th to 2nd 20 18 2nd to 1st 16 16 Second data 1st to 3rd 16 18 3rd to 4th 24 22 4th to 2nd 18 18 2nd to 1st 24 24 Third data 1st to 3rd 7 8 3rd to 4th 10 8 4th to 2nd 10 10 2nd to 1st 9 10 Fourth data 1st to 3rd 6 8 3rd to 4th 9 8 4th to 2nd 11 12 2nd to 1st 11 10
(115) In the table 1, the first data shows a result of the case where an amount of flow corresponding to the virtual exhaust gas Gs and the exhaust gas G at the input 211 of the input pipe portions 21A, 21B, 21C and 21D is 10 g/sec, and the rotational speed is 1500 r.p.m. The second data shows a result of the case where the amount of flow is 25 g/sec, and the rotational speed is 1500 r.p.m. The third data shows a result of the case where the amount of flow is 40 g/sec and the rotational speed is 3000 r.p.m. The fourth data shows a result of the case where the amount of flow is 25 g/sec and the rotational speed is 3000 r.p.m.
(116)
(117) At this time, as a degree of a correlation between the analysis time intervals and the actual measurement time intervals, a decision coefficient R.sup.2 with a correlation coefficient R is acquired. The result was R.sup.2=0.8139, and it was confirmed that the decision coefficient R.sup.2 was 0.8 or more. Accordingly, validity of the analysis data DS of the simulation S with this test was confirmed.
Other Embodiment
(118) The actual amplitude curve KM in the actual measurement data DM can be modified by smoothing the curve thereof with various methods, thereby allowing the reference points of the actual amplitude curve KM to be readily readable. For example, the actual amplitude curve KM in the actual measurement data DM may be formed such that a change in the concentration of the specific gas component is averaged for a plurality of periods, as a single period data.
(119)
(120) Specifically, in the third data before performing the averaging process for the curves shown in
(121) In the case where the reference points of the actual amplitude curves KM are set as peak points or bottom points, the peak points or the bottom points of the actual amplitude curves KM can be determined as points where gradient per unit of time of the actual amplitude curve KM become 0. This gradient indicates an amount of change in concentration of the specific gas component per unit of time. When obtaining the gradient, for respective actual amplitude curves KM, a difference between the concentration of the specific gas component obtained at previous sampling time, and the concentration of the specific gas component obtained at current sampling time is calculated for concentration of the specific gas component actually measured at predetermined sampling intervals. Then this difference is determined as a gradient of the actual amplitude curve KM per unit of time.
(122)
(123) In peak points and bottom points in the first to fourth actual amplitude curves KM1, KM2, KM3 and KM4, an amount of change per unit of time of the concentration of the specific gas component becomes minimum and the gradient value becomes zero as well. However, due to variation during the actual measurement, the gradient value may become zero at points which are not peak points nor bottom points. The peak points or the bottom point may be determined based on not only a graph showing gradient per unit of time, but both of a graph showing gradient and a graph of the actual amplitude curve KM with or without averaging process being performed.
(124) Although illustration is omitted, in the case where the reference points of the analysis amplitude curve KS are set as peak points or bottom points, the peak points or the bottom points of the analysis amplitude curve KS may be calculated as points at which the gradient per unit of time becomes zero. In this case, the peak point or the bottom points in the analysis amplitude curve KS can readily be calculated.
(125) The present disclosure is not limited to the above-described embodiments, various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of spirit of the present disclosure.