Treatment of Kidney Disease Using Renal Nerve Denervation Via the Renal Pelvis
20240024013 ยท 2024-01-25
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61B2018/044
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B18/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B18/1492
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2018/0016
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2018/1475
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2018/00404
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B18/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B18/18
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
In an illustrative embodiment, systems and methods for treating kidney disease in a human patient are disclosed. A method includes advancing a collapsible array of RF electrodes through a urinary tract of the patient in collapsed form and into a position in or near a renal pelvis. The effector is deployed to an expanded form to engage at least a portion of an interior wall of the renal pelvis. RF energy delivered through the array of electrodes target afferent nerves proximate the interior wall of the renal pelvis to inhibit or destroy their function. eGFR of the patient can be raised after treatment according to the method.
Claims
1. A method for treating kidney disease in a human subject, the method comprising: advancing a collapsible effector carrying an array of radiofrequency (RF) electrodes through a urinary tract of the subject in a collapsed form and into a position in a renal pelvis and/or a region of a ureter adjacent the renal pelvis; deploying the collapsible effector from the collapsed form to an expanded form to engage at least a portion of an interior wall of the renal pelvis; and delivering RF energy to the array of RF electrodes to target afferent nerves proximate the interior wall of the renal pelvis to inhibit or destroy function of the afferent nerves.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein targeting afferent nerves proximate the interior wall of the renal pelvis comprises directing RF energy to urothelial and submucosal layers present in and adjacent the interior wall of the renal pelvis.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising targeting afferent nerves present between smooth muscle layers adjacent the inner wall of the renal pelvis.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein delivering RF energy comprises delivering RF energy to raise a temperature of a region containing the afferent nerves to a temperature in a range between 45 C. and 60 C.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein raising the temperature of the region comprises raising the temperature to a temperature in the range for 1 to 2 minutes.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the array of RF electrodes are monopolar electrodes and delivering RF energy to the array comprises delivering RF energy between the array of RF electrodes and a dispersive electrode.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising selecting the subject as a candidate for the method based on inclusion criteria that include a measured or estimated subject pre-treatment glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that lies within a target range.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the subject pre-treatment GFR is an estimated GFR (eGFR).
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the inclusion criteria do not require that the subject have diagnosed hypertension in order to be selected for treatment.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the inclusion criteria further include a subject mean daytime systolic blood pressure in a range between 135 and 170 mmHg.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the inclusion criteria include a subject mean daytime diastolic blood pressure below 105 mmHg.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein the target range covers subjects with a pre-treatment GFR indicative of stage 3, stage 4, or stage 5 chronic kidney disease.
13. The method of claim 7, wherein the inclusion criteria requires that the subject not have type 1 diabetes.
14. The method of claim 7, wherein the inclusion criteria allow selection of the subject as a candidate that has a GFR above the target range, when the subject also has an albumin level indicative of proteinuria.
15. The method of claim 7, resulting in a statistically significant increase in measured or estimated GFR of the subject from the pre-treatment GFR, as measured or estimated at least two months after treatment of the subject.
16. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the subject as a candidate for the method based on inclusion criteria that include a measured or estimated subject pre-treatment glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that lies within a target range.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the inclusion criteria do not require that the subject have diagnosed hypertension in order to be selected for treatment.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the inclusion criteria allow selection of the subject as a candidate that has a GFR above the target range, when the subject also has an albumin level indicative of proteinuria.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the target range includes subjects with a pre-treatment GFR indicative of stage 3, stage 4, or stage 5 kidney disease.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the treated kidney disease comprises at least one of chronic kidney disease and polycystic kidney disease.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments and, together with the description, explain these embodiments. Where applicable, some or all features may not be illustrated to assist in the description of underlying features. In the drawings:
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
[0047] The description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended to be a description of various, illustrative embodiments of the disclosed subject matter. Specific features and functionalities are described in connection with each illustrative embodiment; however, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed embodiments may be practiced without each of those specific features and functionalities.
[0048] It is noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms a, an, and the include plural referents unless the context expressly dictates otherwise. That is, unless expressly specified otherwise, as used herein the words a, an, the, and the like carry the meaning of one or more. Additionally, it is to be understood that terms such as left, right, top, bottom, front, rear, side, height, length, width, upper, lower, interior, exterior, inner, outer, and the like that may be used herein merely describe points of reference and do not necessarily limit embodiments of the present disclosure to any particular orientation or configuration. Furthermore, terms such as first, second, third, etc., merely identify one of a number of portions, components, steps, operations, functions, and/or points of reference as disclosed herein, and likewise do not necessarily limit embodiments of the present disclosure to any particular configuration or orientation.
[0049] Furthermore, the terms approximately, about, proximate, minor variation, and similar terms generally refer to ranges that include the identified value within a margin of 20%, 10% or preferably 5% in certain embodiments, and any values therebetween.
[0050] A patient's urinary tract is diagrammatically illustrated in
[0051] Referring now to
[0052] As further shown in
[0053] Referring now to
[0054] As shown in
[0055] Once in the renal pelvis RP, the effector 16 will be deployed in order to treat the renal nerves in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure. For example, the effector may comprise an expandable structure which is mechanically expanded or inflated within the renal pelvis to engage the interior walls of the pelvis as shown in
[0056] As shown in
[0057] As shown in
[0058] Still another alternative energy delivery mechanism is illustrated in
[0059] As shown in
[0060] Still further, effector 16 construction shown in
[0061] Referring now to
[0062] Referring now to
[0063] After the marker 78 of the catheter 70 is positioned at or just above the ureteral os OS, as shown in
[0064] Referring to
[0065] Further referring to
[0066] Referring now to
[0067] In order to confirm proper deployment of the electrode wires 130, radiopaque markers 136 are formed distally to, between, and proximally to the slit-malecot structures 128, so that the markers will appear to move together under fluoroscopic observation as the malecots are deployed by pulling on cable 127.
[0068] As shown in
Experimental
[0069] Background Endovascular renal denervation is known to produce useful blood pressure (BP) reductions. The data below demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of renal denervation by delivery of radiofrequency energy across the renal pelvis utilizing the natural orifice of the urethra and the ureters. This open-label, single-arm feasibility study enrolled patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite antihypertensive drug therapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the change in ambulatory daytime systolic BP (SBP) 2 months following renal pelvic denervation.
[0070] Surprisingly, the data further demonstrated a small but significant increase in eGFR and a significant decrease in mean serum creatinine, both of which correlate with a decreased risk of kidney disease and associated morbidities, including a reduced risk of stroke, congestive heart failure, and end-stage renal disease, as well as improved hormone function, including reductions in renin, aldosterone, and angiotensin.
Methods
[0071] Participants. Adults between the ages of 18 and 70 with uncontrolled hypertension were eligible for the study at either of two study sites. While continuing to take their background antihypertensive therapy of up to three antihypertensive medications, mean daytime systolic blood pressure measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was required to be at least 135 mm Hg and less than 170 mmHg, with mean daytime diastolic blood pressure less than 105 mm Hg. For those not receiving medications, mean daytime systolic blood pressure was required to be at least 140 mm Hg and less than 170, with mean daytime diastolic blood pressure less than 105 mm Hg. However, while the protocol allowed for participation of both on-med and off-med patients, a decision was made early during the patient enrollment period to recruit only those patients receiving antihypertensive medications. This study report is based on the 18 patients on antihypertensive drug therapy.
[0072] Exclusion criteria included an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) under 45 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 (calculated via the CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation, National Kidney Foundation), type I diabetes, clinically significant structural heart disease and secondary hypertension. The study (NCT05440513) was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before study enrollment.
[0073] Study Procedures. Baseline evaluation included measurement of automated office blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring along with laboratory assessment of serum and urine parameters according to a standard routine. Following collection of blood and urine specimens, patients were seated and allowed to rest for 5 minutes prior to use of an automated blood pressure measurement device (HEM-907XL, Omron Healthcare, Bannockburn, IL) which recorded blood pressure in each arm. Office blood pressure measurement was recorded in triplicate with one-minute separations between measurements. The arm with higher blood pressure at the baseline assessment was used for all subsequent measures. Study personnel would then witness the antihypertensive medication self-administration before positioning the arm cuff for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABP OnTrak 90227, Spacelabs Healthcare, Snoqualmie, WA) on the same arm as used for office blood pressure measurements. Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day (0600-2159 h) and every 30 minutes at night (2200-0559 h). Patients would return the following day, at a time to assure at least 24 hours of blood pressure recording time, for the device to be removed. Additional baseline assessments included a pregnancy test where relevant, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, computed tomographic (CT) urography and renal ultrasound.
[0074] For those patients meeting entry criteria, renal pelvic denervation was performed via the use of the Verve Medical Phoenix system. (Verve Medical, Paradise Valley, AZ). This system includes an RF generator and monopolar ablation device with 4 spherical electrodes. A dispersive electrical grounding pad was used (Universal Electrosurgical Pad with Cord, REF 9135-LP, 3M, Saint Paul, MN). The ablation device is placed into the renal pelvis following insertion of a 0.035-0.038 soft tip guidewire into the bladder under visual guidance via rigid cystoscope, which is then advanced under fluoroscopy past the uretero-pelvic junction. A sheath (Destina Twist, Oscor, Inc., Palm Harbor, FL) is passed over that wire to allow for placement of the Phoenix ablation device into the pelvis, beyond the ureteropelvic junction. The generator delivers up to 30 watts of power via this ablation device, which has 4 spherical conductors on a nitinol helix designed to expand into the renal pelvis and abut the uroepithelial lining. When activated, energy is delivered to increase the temperature to 60 C. within 20 seconds and maintain 60 C. for 2 minutes. Energy is delivered for a single cycle, then repeated in the other kidney. At the completion of the ablation, physicians were permitted to place ureteral stents at their discretion, which, when deployed, remained in place until the day 14 visit.
[0075] Unless clinically necessary, physicians and subjects were encouraged not to terminate or add antihypertensive medications following renal pelvic denervation until completing the Month 2 assessments, with addition of medicines permitted thereafter if office blood pressure continued to be uncontrolled. Post-treatment assessments were scheduled for Day 1, Day 14 and Month 1 with primary endpoints of safety and effectiveness performed at Month 2. At each visit, subjects underwent clinical evaluation including pain assessment and office blood pressure measurement.
[0076] At Day 14, Month 1 and Month 2, specimens were obtained for blood and urine testing. At Month 1 and 2, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed. At Month 1, renal ultrasound and CT urography were repeated. Concomitant medications were recorded, and adverse events were elicited at every visit.
[0077] Safety events of interest were defined in the protocol as: cardiovascular (including acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute kidney injury, or death), device and procedure-related adverse events, urologic events (i.e., infections, hematuria, pain, urinary incontinency and/or obstruction within 14 days of the procedure) and clinically significant changes in serum and urine biochemistry.
Statistical Analysis.
[0078] The objectives of the study were to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Verve Medical Phoenix system. Safety was assessed through laboratory, urologic imaging and clinical events, included adverse events, serious adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events.
[0079] The primary effectiveness endpoint was the mean change in daytime systolic blood pressure measured by ABPM from baseline to 2 months. Additional endpoints included changes in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure.
[0080] Summary single timepoint measurements and baseline characteristics are expressed as meanSD (standard deviation) or percentages (%). Changes in continuous variables from baseline are shown as mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI). P values for individual time points are based on paired t-tests with changes through the assessment at Month 2, the primary endpoint, are based of mixed models (i.e., random effects models) using the Satterthwaite approximation for degrees of freedom for the overall p-value (F-statistic) and confidence intervals (t-statistic). Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.1.3 (R Core Team 2022). A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Subgroup analyses considered a p<0.10 as significant. DH had full access to all data from the clinical trial and was responsible for the integrity of the data used in the analysis.
Results
[0081] Eighteen patients (mean age 5612 years) were enrolled on average antihypertensive drug intake of 2.7 daily. Renal pelvic denervation reduced mean daytime SBP by 19.4 mmHg (95% CI: 24.9, 14.0, p<0.001) from its baseline of 148.48.7 mm Hg. Mean nighttime (21.4 mmHg, 95% CI: 29.5, 13.3) and 24-hour (20.3 mmHg, 95% CI: 26.2, 14.5) SBP fell significantly (p<0.001) as did the corresponding diastolic BP (DBP) (p<0.001). Office SBP decreased from 156.512.3 mmHg by 8.3 mmHg (95% CI: 13.2, 3.5, p=0.002) within 24 hours post-procedure and by 22.4 mmHg (95% CI: 31.5, 13.3, p<0.001) by 2 months. Office DBP was reduced (p=0.001) by 2 months. Mild transitory back pain followed the procedure, but there were no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine decreased by 0.08 mg/dL (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased by 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 (p=0.03) 2 months following ablation procedure.
[0082] Baseline. Of 41 patients who signed informed consents, 21 were excluded (
[0083] The study population included 18 patients receiving antihypertensive medicines (Table 1) and two not receiving blood pressure lowering drugs, with the focus of this report on those patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. Average age was 5612 years, the cohort included 7 women and 11 men who, on average, were treated with 2.7 antihypertensive drugs (Table 1).
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Select baseline characteristics of on-med subjects (n {%}, mean (SD)) Characteristic n = 18 Age 56 (12) Female subjects 7 (39%} Body mass index (m/kg.sup.2) 31.6 (4.5) Diabetes mellitus 3 (17%) Myocardial infarction 2 (11%) Coronary artery disease 3 (17%) estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 80 (18) (ml/min/1.73 m.sup.2) Number of hypertension drugs 2.7 (0.5) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor 16 (89%,) Angiotensin receptor blocker 1 (5.6%) Calcium channel blocker 14 (78%) Beta-blocker 7 (39%) Diuretic 10 (56%) Oral diabetic 3 (17%) Statin 10 (56%)
[0084] Procedural Safety. No serious intra-procedural adverse events were observed. Following renal pelvic denervation, bilateral double-J ureteral stents were placed at investigators' discretion in 9 of 18 patients, which were removed in the office at the 14-day follow-up without complication.
[0085] Adverse Events. There were no serious adverse events and no treatment-emergent adverse events. In those subjects without stent placement, 5/9 reported back/flank pain, while 7/9 who had stents placed reported some pain or discomfort. By day 14, none of the nine patients without stents had pain while 3 patients with stents in place reported mild back or flank pain that persisted following hospital discharge but which resolved prior to or one day following removal of the stents (with average pain score of 3 out of 10 at day 14). In one subject, a renal stone 2.5-3 mm was evident one month after treatment, in whom the baseline study showed evidence of microliths and calcifications, indicating stone formation prior to treatment. The site reported that there was no stone evident on ultrasound imaging at month 6 or month 12. The one subject with proteinuria on a scheduled urinalysis had repeat study 4 days later with no evidence of proteinuria. There were no interventions or concomitant therapies for either of these two patients, and both were categorized as mild and resolved. Nonetheless, the investigator listed these as adverse events. One patient's hemoglobin level dropped from 11.6 g/dL at baseline to 9.8 g/dL at month 1 with initiation of iron anemia at month 6 follow-up. No adverse events are ongoing (Table 2).
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Safety and tolerability of renal pelvic denervation. Event n (%) Post-procedure back/flank pain* 12 (67%) Persistent back/flank pain 0 (0%) Urinary tract infection 2 (11%) Cystitis 0 (0%) Proteinuria 1 (6%) Anemia 1 (6%) Renal stone 1 (6%) Perforation 0 (0%) Hypertensive crisis 0 (0%) Acute kidney injury 0 (0%) Renal failure 0 (0%) Acute coronary syndrome 0 (0%) Stroke 0 (0%) Hospitalization 0 (0%) Death 0 (0%) Treatment-emergent adverse event 0 (0%) Serious adverse event 0 (0%) *Post procedure back/flank pain was evident by day 14 only in 3 subjects - each of whom had stents in place - with average score of 3 out of 10, with pain resolved within 1 day of stent removal. Both urinary tract infections responded to treatment with oral antibiotics.
[0086] Effect on Blood Pressure. The primary effectiveness endpoint of daytime systolic blood pressure at 2 months post-procedure was significantly reduced by 19.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 24.9, 14.0, p<0.001). There were also significant reductions in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure by 20.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 26.2, 14.5, p<0.001) and nighttime systolic blood pressure by 21.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 29.5, 13.3, p<0.001). The corresponding changes for diastolic blood pressure were 9.7 mm Hg daytime (95% CI: 12.7, 6.8), 9.2 mm Hg nighttime (95% CI: 13.3, 5.0), and 9.6 mm Hg over 24 hours (95% CI: 12.5, 6.6). All these diastolic blood pressure changes were significant (p<0.001). (
[0087] Office systolic blood pressure was reduced by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 31.0, 13.8, p<0.001) 2 months post-procedure (
[0088] By 2 months post procedure, mean daytime systolic blood pressure fell in 17 of 18 (94%) subjects and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure fell in all 18 patients (
[0089] Office heart rate on the first day increased compared to baseline following renal pelvic denervation (p=0.03) but was lower at months 1 and 2 (p<0.07). Overall treatment effects of renal pelvic denervation resulted in a significant reduction in office heart rate (p<0.001) but no significant changes in heart rate were observed in mean daytime, nighttime or 24-hours levels.
[0090] Exploratory analysis of the response in subjects with (n=8) compared to those without (n=10) isolated systolic hypertension did not suggest differences between these groups in any measure of change in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate (p=0.08 by Hotelling's T-statistic). Univariate analyses suggested smaller reduction in daytime and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure for subjects with isolated systolic hypertension. Two months following ablation in these subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, 24-hour systolic blood pressure dropped by 16.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 25.8 to 7.7, p=0.003 by t-test) and diastolic blood pressure dropped by 6.1 mm Hg (95% CI: 9.6 to 2.6, p=0.004 by t-test).
[0091] Effects on Laboratory Assessments. There was a small but significant increase in eGFR (6.3 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 at month 1 and 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 at month 2. p=0.033 by mixed model) and a significant decrease in mean serum creatinine (0.08 mg/dL both at months 1 and 2, p=0.023 by mixed model). Hemoglobin dropped by 0.5 g/dL by day 14, by g/dL at month 1 and by 0.7 g/dL at month 2 (p=0.001 by mixed model). Hematocrit dropped by 2.4% (p=0.007 by mixed model) by month 2. No significant changes were noted in sodium and potassium levels.
[0092] Chronic kidney disease is typically classified by stages from stage 1 to stage 5. Generally, with all numbers expressed in units of mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2, stage 1 is indicated by a GFR of 90 or above, stage 2 covers GFR in a range between 60 and 89, stage 3 covers GFR in a range between 30 and 59, stage 4 covers GFR in a range between 15 and 29, and stage 5 is classified as having a GFR below 15. Although patients at all stages can benefit from treatment as described herein, treatment is particularly beneficial for patients at stages 3-5.
[0093] It is believed that, other than eGFR/GFR, there are other markers typically associated with kidney disease that can be used to select subjects for treatment according to embodiments herein, and that will respond positively to treatment. For instance, one indicator associated with kidney damage is the presence of albumin in a urine sample. This indicator may show that kidney issues exist even when eGFR is in a normal, stage 1, or stage 2 range. In a normally functioning kidney, little to no protein/albumin is passed from the blood to the urine by the glomerular capsules in the kidney. In a damaged kidney and/or due to high blood pressure, the glomerular capsules may to some extent be unable to prevent the passage of protein/albumin from the blood to the urine. This condition is known as albuminuria or proteinuria. It is a symptom associated with many different types of kidney disease and can be a significant risk factor for complications.
[0094] In an embodiment, one or more methods for measuring albumin is performed on a candidate. One known method is a dipstick method, where the candidate's urine is reacted with a stick that changes color to indicate protein levels in the urine. Another method collects a candidate's 24-hour production of urine and measures the amount of protein excreted in the urine over that timeframe. A normal range of albumin in the urine by this measure is <150 mg/day. Proteinuria is generally indicated when albumin levels exceed 500 mg/day, and levels that exceed 3.5 g/day are indicative of nephrotic syndrome. Where creatinine is also measured, another marker can be developed using the ratio of albumin to creatinine in a sample.
[0095] In an embodiment, efficacy of treatment can be measured by taking a baseline proteinuria reading, which may be used alone or in combination with other metabolic indicators to screen candidates in or out for treatment. At one or more timeframes after treatment (e.g., two weeks, one month, two months, six months, or twelve months), a second proteinuria reading is taken and compared to the baseline reading. A decrease in albumin measure should be expected when a patient responds positively to treatment.
[0096] All of the functionalities described in connection with one embodiment are intended to be applicable to other embodiments except where expressly stated to the contrary or where the feature or function is incompatible with the additional embodiments. For example, where a given feature or function is expressly described in connection with one embodiment but not expressly mentioned in connection with an alternative embodiment, it should be understood that the inventors intend that that feature or function may be deployed, utilized or implemented in connection with the alternative embodiment unless the feature or function is incompatible with the alternative embodiment.
[0097] While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosures. Indeed, the novel methods, apparatuses and systems described herein can be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods, apparatuses and systems described herein can be made without departing from the spirit of the present disclosures. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the present disclosures.