METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MEASURING THE LAXITY OF A JOINT OF A HUMAN OR AN ANIMAL

Abstract

The invention relates to a method of determining the laxity of a joint (9, 15) of a human (5) or an animal. The method comprises providing at least one patient-specific geometrical model (1) of at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis comprised by the joint. Known loads are applied to the joint or to a part of the body connected to the joint, and a series of actual images (16) of the joint are obtained while the loads are applied. Then the at least one patient-specific geometrical model (1) is registered onto the actual images (16). Based thereon relative displacement and/or rotation of the at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis is calculated as a function of the applied loads, and based thereon a measure of the laxity of the joint is determined. The invention further relates to a system for performing such a method and to a computer readable medium for performing such a method.

Claims

1. Method of determining the laxity of a joint of a human or an animal, the method comprising: providing at least one patient-specific geometrical model of at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis comprised by the joint, providing a series of actual images of the joint obtained while known loads were applied to the joint or to a part of the body connected to the joint, registering the at least one patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images, based thereon calculate relative displacement and/or rotation of the at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis as a function of the applied loads, and based on the calculated relative displacement and/or rotation determine a measure of the laxity of the joint.

2. Method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one patient-specific geometrical model is obtained from at least one medical image and/or at least one CAD model, such as medical images obtained by a CT scanner or a MRI scanner.

3. Method according to claim 1, wherein the loads are applied in multiple spatial directions.

4. Method according to claim 3, wherein the at least one patient-specific geometrical model is a 3D model, and wherein the relative displacement and/or rotation is calculated in 3D so that 3D laxity properties of the joint can be determined.

5. Method according to claim 1, wherein the actual images are bi-planar X-ray images, ultrasound images, CT or MRI images.

6. Method according to claim 1, wherein the loads are applied by a loading device at least partly arranged inside a bi-planar X-ray scanner so that the joint is positioned inside the scanner.

7. Method according to claim 1, wherein the actual images are obtained by use of a slot scanner.

8. Method according to claim 7, wherein the slot scanner is an EOS scanner.

9. Method according to claim 1, wherein the registering of the patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images is performed by an iterative closest point optimization or a match between digitally reconstructed radiographs and the actual images.

10. System for determining the laxity of a joint of a human or animal, the system comprising means for providing at least one patient-specific geometrical model of at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis comprised by the joint, loading device for applying known loads to the joint or to a part of the body connected to the joint, image forming device for obtaining a series of actual images of the joint while the loads are applied, and at least one computer adapted to: register the at least one patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images, based thereon calculate relative displacement and/or rotation of the at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis as a function of the applied loads, and based on the calculated relative displacement and/or rotation determine a measure of the laxity of the joint.

11. System according to claim 10, wherein the means for providing at least one patient-specific geometrical model is adapted to base the at least one patient-specific geometrical model on medical images obtained by a CT scanner or a MRI scanner and/or CAD models.

12. System according to claim 10, wherein the loading device is adapted to apply the loads in multiple spatial directions.

13. System according to claim 10, wherein image-forming device is an X-ray apparatus or an ultrasound apparatus.

14. System according to claim 13, wherein the image-forming device is a slot scanner, such as an EOS scanner.

15. System according to claim 10, wherein the computer is adapted to perform the registering of the patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images by an iterative closest point optimization or a match between digitally reconstructed radiographs and the actual images.

16. A computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method of claim 1, comprising: retrieving from a first storage medium at least one patient-specific geometrical model of at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis comprised by the joint, retrieving from the first storage medium or from a second storage medium a series of actual images of the joint obtained while known loads were applied to the joint or to a part of the body connected to the joint, registering the at least one patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images, based thereon calculate relative displacement and/or rotation of the at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis as a function of the applied loads, and based on the calculated relative displacement and/or rotation determine a measure of the laxity of the joint.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0058] The method and system for determining the laxity of a joint of a human or an animal according to the invention will now be described in more detail with regard to the accompanying figures. The figures show one way of implementing the present invention and is not to be construed as being limiting to other possible embodiments falling within the scope of the attached claim set.

[0059] FIG. 1 is a flow-chart of a method according to the invention.

[0060] FIG. 2 shows an example of a constructed 3D model of a bone based on a MRI image.

[0061] FIG. 3 shows an example of a 3D model of a prosthesis; two different representations of the same model are shown in FIGS. 3.a and 3.b.

[0062] FIG. 4 schematically shows an example of a loading device where the loads can applied in multiple spatial directions.

[0063] FIG. 5 schematically shows how loads can be applied to an elbow.

[0064] FIG. 6 schematically shows how 3D positions and orientations of 3D geometrical models of femur, patella and tibia can be reconstructed from the frontal and lateral X-ray images obtained as shown in FIG. 4.

[0065] FIG. 7 schematically summarizes an example of the method according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT

[0066] FIG. 1 schematically shows a flow-chart of the method of determining the laxity of a joint of a human or an animal according to the present invention; more details of the method steps will be given in the following figures. The method comprises the following steps which will be described in details below: [0067] (A) providing at least one patient-specific geometrical model of at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis comprised by the joint, [0068] (B) providing a series of actual images of the joint obtained while known loads were applied to the joint or to a part of the body connected to the joint, [0069] (C) registering the at least one patient-specific geometrical model onto the actual images, [0070] (D) based thereon calculate relative displacement and/or rotation of the at least one bone and/or at least one prosthesis as a function of the applied loads, and [0071] (E) based on the calculated relative displacement and/or rotation determine a measure of the laxity of the joint.

[0072] The steps shown in FIG. 1 will each correspond to a part of a system according to an aspect of the invention.

[0073] The at least one patient-specific geometrical model may e.g. be obtained from at least one medical image and/or at least one CAD model. FIG. 2 shows an example of how a 3D-model 1 can be constructed from digital images 2 (only one shown in the figure) obtained by a MRI scanner. The arrows in the figure schematically show which part of the contours in the digital image that matches the resulting bone contour in the model. FIG. 3 shows an example of a 3D model 3 of a prosthesis. FIG. 3.a shows the model as solid, and FIG. 3.b shows the same model as line drawing. The two different representations are given to show the features of the model as comprehensively as possible.

[0074] FIG. 4 schematically shows a possible embodiment of a loading device 4 which can be used to apply the loads. However, any way of applying known loads in a controlled manner is covered by the scope of the present invention. With such an embodiment, the loads can be applied in multiple spatial directions. FIG. 4.a shows a side view of a person 5 having the right foot 6 and the lower part of the shank 7 fastened to a parallel manipulator 8; such a parallel manipulator 8 is known on its own, and the use and control thereof will be well known to a person skilled in the art. It can be used to provide both translational and rotational movement of the shank 7 resulting in corresponding forces being applied to the knee 9. FIG. 4.b shows a top view of the loading device in FIG. 4.a arranged inside a slot scanner 10. The loading device 4 comprises a six degrees of freedom parallel manipulator 8 and a six-axis force and moment sensor 11. It further comprises a shank fixation component 12, a thigh fixation component 13, and an adjustable seat 14. The illustrated loading device 4 is controlled by a computer (not shown). The loading device 4 can also be used for applying load to the elbow 15; an example of such an embodiment is shown schematically in FIG. 5.

[0075] FIG. 6 is an illustration of how to obtain the 3D positions and orientations of 3D geometrical models of femur, patella and tibia reconstructed from the actual images 16, i.e. the frontal and lateral X-ray images 16 obtained as shown in FIG. 4.b. The arrows in the figure schematically show which parts of the contours in the actual image 16 that match the resulting bone contour 17. The reconstruction has been accomplished by minimizing the difference in the measured X-ray contour and the contour of the models projected onto the X-ray images; this is an example of a method including an iterative closest point optimization. By using a patient-specific geometrical model which is a 3D model, and calculating the relative displacement and/or rotation in 3D, it is obtained that 3D laxity properties of the joint can be determined.

[0076] FIG. 7 schematically summarizes an example of the method as described above. FIG. 7.a schematically shows a slot scanner 10, such as an EOS scanner, by use of which the actual images 16 are obtained. FIG. 7.b schematically shows the loading device 4, and FIG. 7.c schematically shows bone pose reconstruction. The invention can thus be seen as a combination of several techniques, which are not normally combined. In the example in FIG. 7, the 3D laxity of a joint is thus obtained from a combination of a slot scanner 10, a loading device 4 and 3D bone models 1. The calculation of a measure of the laxity based on displacements and rotations will typically be based on tables or equations describing such known relationships. Which specific kind of relationships to use may be determined as part of a design process for a given system, and it may also include use of neural networks to continuously build new information into the system.

[0077] Although the present invention has been described in connection with the specified embodiments, it should not be construed as being in any way limited to the presented examples. The scope of the present invention is set out by the accompanying claim set. In the context of the claims, the terms comprising or comprises do not exclude other possible elements or steps. In addition, the mentioning of references such as a or an etc. should not be construed as excluding a plurality. The use of reference signs in the claims with respect to elements indicated in the figures shall also not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. Furthermore, individual features mentioned in different claims, may possibly be advantageously combined, and the mentioning of these features in different claims does not exclude that a combination of features is not possible and advantageous.