CONTROL ROD MOTION MONITORING SYSTEM AND CONTROL ROD MOTION MONITORING METHOD

Abstract

Provided is a control rod motion monitoring method and a control rod motion monitoring system, in which a control rod insertion in an entire core is monitored at all time during operation of a reactor and, when an abnormality occurs, a signal is issued to a countermeasure device that automatically starts operation and an alarm is issued to prompt operation of an operator. An LPRM detector in an LPRM assembly of the entire core is divided into four channels for each height; indicated values are averaged at all time; the average indicated value is compared with a set point; and a signal is issued to a countermeasure device when an abnormality occurs.

Claims

1. A control rod motion monitoring system for a reactor, in which a plurality of neutron detector assemblies, which includes a plurality of neutron detectors arranged in an axial direction of a core, is arranged in a radial direction of the entire core, the control rod motion monitoring system comprising: a signal processing device which averages neutron fluxes measured by neutron detectors located at substantially the same height in the axial direction of the core at all time; and an arithmetic device which transmits a signal to a plurality of devices based on the average value processed by the signal processing device.

2. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the signal is transmitted to the plurality of devices when the average value processed by the signal processing device exceeds a predetermined set point.

3. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the reactor includes a control rod drive device which drives a control rod, and the arithmetic device transmits a signal to the control rod drive device.

4. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the reactor includes an alarm which notifies an abnormality to an operator, and the arithmetic device transmits a signal to the alarm.

5. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the signal processing device averages the neutron fluxes for each predetermined height in the axial direction of the core, and transmits a signal to the plurality of devices when a maximum value of a deviation between average values processed for each predetermined height exceeds a predetermined set point.

6. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the signal processing device averages the neutron fluxes for each predetermined height in the axial direction of the core, and transmits a signal to the plurality of devices when a maximum value of a ratio between average values processed for each predetermined height exceeds a predetermined set point.

7. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein a signal from an LPRM assembly at an outermost peripheral portion of the core is excluded from an averaging target.

8. The control rod motion monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the neutron detectors located at substantially the same height in the axial direction of the core are further grouped and averaged.

9. A control rod motion monitoring method for a reactor, in which a plurality of neutron detector assemblies, which includes a plurality of neutron detectors arranged in an axial direction of a cores is arranged in a radial direction of the entire core, the method comprising: averaging neutron fluxes measured by neutron detectors located at substantially the same height in the axial direction of the core at all time; and transmitting a signal to a plurality of devices based on the average value.

10. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein the signal is transmitted to the plurality of devices when the average value exceeds a predetermined set point.

11. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein a signal is transmitted to a control rod drive device based on the average value.

12. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein a signal is transmitted to an alarm based on the average value.

13. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein the neutron fluxes for each predetermined height in the axial direction of the core are averaged, and a signal is transmitted to the plurality of devices when a maximum value of a deviation between average values processed for each predetermined height exceeds a predetermined set point.

14. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein the neutron fluxes for each predetermined height in the axial direction of the core are averaged, and a signal is transmitted to the plurality of devices when a maximum value of a ratio between average values processed for each predetermined height exceeds a predetermined set point.

15. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein a signal from an LPRM assembly at an outermost peripheral portion of the core is excluded from an averaging target.

16. The control rod motion monitoring method according to claim 9, wherein the neutron detectors located at substantially the same height in the axial direction of the core are further grouped and averaged.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0028] FIG. 1 illustrates a core layout of an LPRM assembly.

[0029] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic system of a control rod motion monitoring system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0030] Embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. In the drawings, the same components are denoted by the same reference numerals, and detailed descriptions of repeated parts will be omitted.

First Embodiment

[0031] The invention divides an LPRM arranged in a core into four channels, and is conducted in a system including a signal processing device which averages indicated values of the channels and an arithmetic device having functions of comparing an average indicated value with a set point and of issuing a signal to a countermeasure device.

[0032] First, an arrangement of an LPRM assembly will be described with reference to FIG. 1. FIG. 1 is a plan view illustrating an arrangement of the LPRM assembly and a fuel assembly in a core. In the core, for example, 52 LPRM assemblies 1 including, for example, four LPRMs (not shown) are arranged at positions where there is no hindrance to operation of a control rod (not shown) between fuel assemblies 2.

[0033] When 1/2 symmetry with respect to a diagonal line of the core is considered and the core is folded at the diagonal line, the LPRM assemblies 1 are loaded at all positions of a diagonal corner where the control rod is loaded.

[0034] A control rod motion monitoring method and a control rod motion monitoring system of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 2. FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic system of the control rod motion monitoring system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.

[0035] In the present embodiment, all the LPRM assemblies 1 in a furnace are used to detect an output fluctuation of the entire core. As illustrated in FIG. 2, an LPRM 3 included in the LPRM assembly 1 is divided into, for example, four channels A to D for each core height, and indicated values of the LPRM 3 (LPRMs 3a to 3d) of the channels are averaged by a signal processing device 4 (4a to 4d).

[0036] FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a reactor in which a plurality of neutron detector assemblies (LPRM assemblies 1), which includes a plurality of neutron detectors arranged in an axial direction of the core, is arranged in a radial direction of the entire core. The neutron detectors (LPRM 3) are arranged at substantially the same height in the axial direction of the core.

[0037] After the average indicated value is transmitted to an arithmetic device 5, a start signal is transmitted from the arithmetic device 5 to a countermeasure device and an alarm when it is determined that there is an abnormal result of signal processing. Such processing is performed at all time during operation of the reactor, so as to cope with a case where a control rod is inserted unexpectedly due to a malfunction or an erroneous operation of a device.

[0038] Next, a signal processing method performed in the arithmetic device 5 will be described. When a plurality of control rods start to be inserted into the core, the indicated value of the channel A (LPRM 3a) decreases while the indicated values of the other channels (LPRM 3b to 3d) increase. In the arithmetic device 5, a deviation of the indicated value of the channel A (LPRM 3a) and a deviation of the indicated values of the other channels (LPRMs 3b to 3d) are respectively calculated. When a maximum value of these deviations deviates from a preset set point, the start signal is transmitted to the countermeasure device, the control rod drive device, and the alarm (none of them shown).

[0039] As described above, it is possible to prevent a fuel rod from being broken in the event that the plurality of control rods is simultaneously inserted into the core.

Second Embodiment

[0040] In the first embodiment, by respectively calculating the deviation of the indicated value of the channel A (LPRM 3a) and the deviation of the indicated values of the other channels (LPRMs 3b to 3d) and comparing a maximum value thereof with a set point, an abnormal increase in the output of the core is detected. However, a ratio of the indicated values of the channels B, C, D (LPRMs 3b to 3d) to the channel A (LPRM 3a) maybe compared with a prescribed set point. In addition, when any indicated value of the channels exceeds a set point, a start signal may be transmitted to the countermeasure device or the alarm.

[0041] As described above, similarly to the first embodiment, it is possible to prevent a fuel rod from being broken in an event that a plurality of control rods is simultaneously inserted into a core.

[0042] In each of the above embodiments, a signal from an LPRM assembly at an outermost peripheral portion of the core may be ignored. In this case, the signal from the LPRM assembly at the outermost peripheral portion of the core, which is a likely low indicated value and causes a variation, is excluded from the averaging. Accordingly, the set point for an event detection can be increased to prevent malfunction.

[0043] In each of the above embodiments, the LPRMs (LPRMs 3a to 3d) that belong to the channels of A to D may be further divided into a plurality of sub-channels and signal processing may be performed, as long as an output fluctuation of the core can be detected. With sub-channeling, the system can be superimposed and the reliability of a control rod motion monitoring system can be improved.

[0044] The invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and includes various modifications. For example, the above embodiments are described in detail for easy understanding of the invention, and the invention is not necessarily limited to those including all the configurations described above. In addition, a part of the configuration of one embodiment can be replaced with the configuration of another embodiment, and the configuration of another embodiment can be added to the configuration of one embodiment. For a part of the configurations of each embodiment, other configurations can be added, removed, or replaced.

REFERENCE SIGN LIST

[0045] 1: LPRM assembly [0046] 2: fuel assembly [0047] 3, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d: LPRM [0048] 4, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d: signal processing device [0049] 5: arithmetic device