SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION DEVICE CONTROL

Abstract

Technical solutions described herein include an emissions control system for treating exhaust gas in a motor vehicle including an internal combustion engine. The emissions control system includes a model-based controller to control reductant injection into the exhaust gas. Controlling the reductant injection includes determining an amount of NOx and an amount of NH3 at an outlet of the first SCR device, and at an outlet of the second SCR device. The controlling further includes computing an amount of reductant to inject to maintain a first predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the first SCR device and to maintain a second predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the second SCR device. Further, the controlling includes sending a command for receipt by the reductant injector to inject the computed amount of reductant.

Claims

1. An emissions control system for treating exhaust gas from an internal combustion engine in a motor vehicle, the emissions control system comprising: a reductant injector; a first selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device; a second SCR device; and a model-based controller that is configured to control the reductant injection into the exhaust gas, the controlling of the reductant injection comprising: determining an amount of NOx and an amount of NH3 at an outlet of the first SCR device; determining an amount of NOx and an amount of NH3 at an outlet of the second SCR device; computing an amount of reductant to inject to maintain a first predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the first SCR device and to maintain a second predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the second SCR device to ensure the optimal operation of both selective catalytic reduction systems, the first SCR device and the second SCR device; and sending a command for receipt by the reductant injector to inject the computed amount of reductant.

2. The emissions control system of claim 1, wherein determining the amount of NH3 at the outlet of the first SCR device is based on computing a first estimated NH3 storage level for the first SCR device, and is further based on receiving a NOx measurement at an inlet of the first SCR device.

3. The emissions control system of claim 2, wherein determining the amount of NH3 at the outlet of the second SCR device is based on computing a second estimated NH3 storage level for the second SCR device, and the amount of NH3 at the outlet of the first SCR device.

4. The emissions control system of claim 3, wherein determining the amount of NH3 at the outlet of the second SCR device is further based on receiving a NOx measurement at the outlet of the first SCR device of the first SCR device.

5. The emissions control system of claim 1, wherein the first SCR device is a SCR filter.

6. The emissions control system of claim 5, wherein the second SCR device is an underfloor SCR device.

7. The emissions control system of claim 1, wherein computing the amount of reductant comprises estimating the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the second SCR device based on a state observer that includes a combination of physical models for the first SCR device and the second SCR device.

8. An exhaust system for treating exhaust gas emitted by an internal combustion engine, configured to perform a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of exhaust gas, the exhaust system comprising: at least a first SCR device; a controller configured to control injection of a reductant into the exhaust gas, the controlling of the reductant injection comprising: determining if the exhaust system includes a second SCR device; in response to the exhaust system including the first SCR device only, computing an amount of reductant to inject based on a first model of the first SCR device, the first model estimating a first NH3 storage level at the first SCR device; in response to the exhaust system including the second SCR device, computing the optimal amount of reductant to inject based on a combination of the first model of the first SCR device and a second model of the second SCR device, the combination estimating the first NH3 storage level at the first SCR device and a second NH3 storage level at the second SCR device; and sending a command to a reductant injector to inject the amount of reductant.

9. The exhaust system of claim 8, wherein the first model uses a first NOx measurement from an inlet of the first SCR device and a second NOx measurement from an outlet of the first SCR device.

10. The exhaust system of claim 9, wherein the second model uses the second NOx measurement from the outlet of the first SCR device and a third NOx measurement from an outlet of the second SCR device.

11. The exhaust system of claim 9, wherein the first model uses a first NH3 estimation from the outlet of the first SCR device and the amount of reductant injected.

12. The exhaust system of claim 11, wherein the second model uses the first NH3 estimation from an outlet of the first SCR device and a second NH3 estimation from an outlet of the second SCR device.

13. The exhaust system of claim 12, wherein, in response to the exhaust system including the second SCR device, computing the optimal amount of reductant comprises maintaining a first predetermined trade-off between an amount of NH3 and an amount of NOx at the outlet of the first SCR device and to maintain a second predetermined trade-off between an amount of NH3 and an amount of NOx at the outlet of the second SCR device.

14. The exhaust system of claim 12, wherein the second SCR device is an underfloor SCR device.

15. A computer-implemented method for controlling reductant injection into an emissions control system that comprises a first selective catalytic reduction (SCR) device, the method comprising: determining if the emissions control system includes a second SCR device; in response to the emissions control system including the first SCR device only, computing an optimal amount of reductant to inject based on a first model of the first SCR device, the first model estimating a first NH3 storage level at the first SCR device; in response to the emissions control system including the second SCR device, computing the optimal amount of reductant to inject based on a combination of the first model of the first SCR device and a second model of the second SCR device, the combination estimating the first NH3 storage level at the first SCR device and a second NH3 storage level at the second SCR device; and sending a command to a reductant injector to inject the amount of reductant.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the first model uses a first NOx measurement from an inlet of the first SCR device and a second NOx measurement from an outlet of the first SCR device.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the second model uses the second NOx measurement from the outlet of the first SCR device and a third NOx measurement from an outlet of the second SCR device.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the first model uses a first NH3 estimation from an outlet of the first SCR device and the amount of reductant injected.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein, in response to the emissions control system including the second SCR device, computing the optimal amount of reductant comprises maintaining a first predetermined ratio between an amount of NH3 and an amount of NOx at a first outlet of the first SCR device and to maintain a second predetermined ratio between an amount of NH3 and an amount of NOx at an outlet of the second SCR device.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the second SCR device is an underfloor SCR device.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] Other features, advantages and details appear, by way of example only, in the following detailed description, the detailed description referring to the drawings in which:

[0012] FIG. 1 is a generalized illustration of an engine and an associated exhaust aftertreatment system that is configured to treat the exhaust flow produced by the engine;

[0013] FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of the reductant injection control system according to one or more embodiments; and

[0014] FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart of an example method for determining an amount of reductant to inject into the exhaust system according to one or more embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0015] The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, its application or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features. As used herein, the term module refers to processing circuitry that may include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory module that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.

[0016] In general, referring to the configuration shown in FIG. 1, a schematic diagram depicts an embodiment of an internal combustion engine 12, a control system 84, and an exhaust gas treatment system 10, in accordance with the one or more embodiments. In the description herein, the engine 12 is described as a diesel engine, however, the engine 12 may be a gasoline engine in one or more examples. The exemplary diesel engine 12 and control system 84 comprises a four-cycle internal combustion diesel engine 12 and electronic engine control module (ECM) 238 that may be configured to accomplish the emission control of exhaust gas flow 16 at tailpipe 19, in accordance with control methods and strategies described herein. The engine may include a known compression-ignition engine having an operating regime that is primarily lean of stoichiometry. Alternatively, diesel engine 12 may include an engine configured to employ any one of a number of engine configurations and associated engine control strategies, and which also includes those having an operational regime (or regimes) that is lean of stoichiometry, e.g., homogeneous-charge compression-ignition engines.

[0017] Diesel engine 12 may be any diesel engine configuration or application, including various vehicular applications (e.g., automotive, marine and the like), as well as various non-vehicular applications (e.g., pumps, generators and the like). During operation, diesel engine 12 generates an exhaust gas feedstream or flow represented by arrows 16 containing regulated and unregulated emission constituents, generally including constituent gases and particulate matter. Exhaust gas treatment system 10 acts to convert regulated constituents, such as, for example, various hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrides of oxygen (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), to unregulated constituents, such as, for example, nitrogen (N2) and water (H2O).

[0018] The exhaust gas treatment system 10 contains piping, joints, and other suitable flow passage and connection features that, together, define a contained passage configured to receive the exhaust flow 16 from the engine 12 and discharge a treated exhaust flow 16 from a tailpipe 19. The exhaust gas treatment system 10 includes, as shown, a selective catalytic reduction device (SCR) 24 and an under-floor ammonia-SCR device (uSCR) 25. The exhaust gas treatment system 10 may further include a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst device (DOC) 22. Downstream from the DOC 22, the two SCR devices are connected in series (serial positioning)the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 respectively.

[0019] The SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 operate cooperatively to decrease NOx emissions, present in the exhaust gas 16 at engine out, to acceptable concentration levels. In general terms, the gaseous emissions originally contained in the exhaust gas 16, are treated to limit the quantity of regulated constituents delivered to the atmosphere. A urea injector 236 is positioned upstream of the SCR 24 to inject an amount of urea solution (e.g., AdBlue, DEF) into the exhaust flow 16.

[0020] The diesel engine 12 is fluidly coupled to an outlet manifold 15 that collects the combustion exhaust products discharged from each cylinder in the engine 12 and consolidates them into the exhaust flow 16 that is delivered to the exhaust gas treatment system 10.

[0021] The DOC 22 is mounted to the exhaust manifold with an inlet that fluidly communicates directly with the exhaust manifold to receive the exhaust flow 16. The exhaust flow 16 exits the DOC 22 and flows downstream towards the SCR 24, for a first selective catalytic reduction and subsequently to the uSCR 25 for a second selective catalytic reduction.

[0022] The DOC 22 may include a combination of platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), and rhodium (Rh) dispersed as fine particles on a high-surface area base metal oxide such as -alumina (-Al.sub.2O.sub.3) or a cerium/zirconium oxide (CeO.sub.2ZrO.sub.2). In one or more examples, the base metal oxide is also present in the SCR 24 anywhere from about 70 g/L to about 150 g/L of available flow volume over the SCR 24. In further examples, the Pt/Pd/Rh loading on the base metal oxide ranges from about 1 to about 7 g/L of available flow volume over the SCR 24.

[0023] In one or more examples, the SCR 24 includes one or more components that utilize a reductant 246 and a catalyst to transform NO and NO.sub.2 in the exhaust gas 16.

[0024] The SCR catalyst composition for the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 is generally a porous and high surface area material, which can operate efficiently to convert NO.sub.x constituents in the exhaust gas 16 in the presence of a reductant 246, such as ammonia. For example, the catalyst composition can contain a zeolite impregnated with one or more base metal components such as iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), vanadium (V), sodium (Na), barium (Ba), titanium (Ti), tungsten (W), and combinations thereof. In a particular embodiment, the catalyst composition can contain a zeolite impregnated with one or more of copper, iron, or vanadium. In some embodiments the zeolite can be a -type zeolite, a Y-type zeolite, a ZM5 zeolite, or any other crystalline zeolite structure such as a Chabazite or a USY (ultra-stable Y-type) zeolite. In a particular embodiment, the zeolite comprises Chabazite. In a particular embodiment, the zeolite comprises SSZ. Suitable SCR catalyst compositions can have high thermal structural stability, particularly when used in tandem with known particulate filter (PF) devices or when incorporated into SCR devices, which are regenerated via high temperature exhaust soot burning techniques.

[0025] The SCR catalyst composition for the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 can optionally further include one or more base metal oxides as promoters to further decrease the SO.sub.3 formation and to extend catalyst life. The one or more base metal oxides can include WO.sub.3, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, and MoO.sub.3, in some embodiments. In one embodiment, WO.sub.3, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, and MoO.sub.3 can be used in combination with V.sub.2O.sub.5.

[0026] The uSCR 25 is positioned downstream from the SCR 24 in the under-floor position. In one or more examples, the distance between the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 ranges from about 3 ft. to about 10 ft. The inlet of the uSCR 25 fluidly communicates with the outlet of the SCR 24 to receive the exhaust flow 16. The outlet of the uSCR 25 communicates the exhaust flow 16 downstream towards the tailpipe opening 19 that emits the exhaust flow to atmosphere.

[0027] The uSCR 25 may include fine particles of (1) a base metal ion-substituted zeolite and/or a base metal ion-substituted silicoaluminophosphate and (2) an oxygen storage material. Zeolites and silicoaluminophosphates are open-framework, microporous, and ammonia absorbent polymorphic molecular sieve materials that are preferably ion-substituted with Cu or Fe. The base metal ion-substituted particles are present in the uSCR 25, in total, anywhere from about 120 g/L to about 180 g/L of available flow volume over the uSCR 25, in one or more examples. The oxygen storage material is a metal oxide or a mixed metal oxide that exhibits oxygen storage and release capacity. In one or more examples, the oxygen storage material is present in the uSCR catalyst 25 anywhere from about 5 g/L to about 50 g/L of available flow volume over the uSCR 25. Any suitable distribution of the particulate materials may be employed. The fine particles of the base metal ion-substituted zeolite/silicoaluminophosphate and the oxygen storage material may, for example, be uniformly mixed within a single washcoat layer or, alternatively, relegated to separate and discrete contacting washcoat layers or zones. The oxygen storage material may also be concentrated near the inlet or the outlet of the uSCR 25 or in some other non-uniform distribution.

[0028] The base metal ion-substituted zeolites that may be used to prepare the uSCR 25 include a Cu or Fe substituted -type zeolite, Y-type zeolite, ZSM-5 zeolite, Chabazite zeolite, or USY (ultra-stable Y-type) zeolite. Further, the base metal ion-substituted silicoaluminophosphates (SAPO) that may be used to prepare the uSCR 25 include a Cu or Fe substituted SAPO-5, SAPO-34, or SAPO-44. Some specific metal oxides or mixed metal oxides that may be included in the uSCR 25 as the oxygen storage material are cerium-containing and praseodymium-containing metal oxides or mixed metal oxides such as CeO.sub.2, Pr.sub.6O.sub.11, CeO.sub.2ZrO.sub.2, CuOCeO.sub.2, FeO.sub.xCeO.sub.2 (1.0X1.5), MnO.sub.xCeO.sub.2 (1.0X3.5), and Pr.sub.6O.sub.11CeO.sub.2. Each of these materials, without being bound by theory, are believed to have crystal lattice structures that can accommodate non-stoichiometric unit cell quantities of oxygen (both higher and lower) without decomposing. This property equates to an ability to reversibly store and release oxygen in response to the partial pressure of oxygen in the exhaust flow 16 and/or equilibrium shifts that accompany the localized consumption of oxygen during NOx reduction.

[0029] When the diesel engine 12 is operating, the exhaust gas treatment system 10 removes the various regulated emissions from the exhaust flow 16 while limiting the amount of ammonia that slips into the exhaust flow 16. The exhaust flow 16 passes, first, through the close-coupled SCR 24 and, second, through the under-floor uSCR 25. The combined catalytic activity of the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 are able to continuously treat the exhaust flow 16 across a robust variety of engine operating conditions. The initial NOx reduction process takes place at SCR 24 where the NOx exiting DOC 22 reacts with NH3 stored in the SCR 24. Any NOx that escapes past the SCR 24 is reduced at the uSCR 25 with the NH3 stored in the uSCR 25 further reducing levels of NOx concentration in the treated exhaust flow 16. The NH3 stored in SCR 24 and uSCR 25 comes from the urea injector 236, while the NH3 stored by uSCR 25 comes from SCRF 24, when the NH3 is captured by the uSCR 25. The exhaust gas treatment system 10 further includes a reductant injector system 84 that controls an amount of reductant injected directly into the SCR 24 and indirectly into the uSCR 25.

[0030] The air/fuel mixture supplied to the engine 12 is constantly adjusted by an electronic fuel injection system (not shown) to achieve a predetermined air to fuel mass ratio, for instance air to fuel ratio may range from 15 to 50, or 15 to 80 on other diesel engine applications. The combustion of the air/fuel mixture in the cylinders of the engine 12 provides the exhaust flow 16 with a relatively large amount of nitrogen (e.g. >70 vol. %.), a small amount of oxygen, and unwanted gaseous emissions comprised of carbon monoxide, HC's, and NOx. The amount of oxygen present is generally less than about 2.0 vol. %. The amount of carbon monoxide, HC's and NOx present is typically about 0.8 vol. % or less, about 800 ppm or less, and about 1500 ppm or less, respectively. The NO.sub.x constituency of the exhaust flow 16 generally includes a large molar proportion of NO (greater than 90 mol %). It should be noted that above values are examples and that in one or more embodiments, the values may be different than those listed above. It is understood that the above values are exemplary and that in one or more examples, the engine 12 can operate with the above measurements being different than those described herein.

[0031] The instantaneous air to fuel mass ratio of the air/fuel mixture, however, may oscillate between 15 to 80 according to the engine calibrations and operating conditions. These oscillations cause the chemical composition of the exhaust flow 16 to vary within particular limits.

[0032] The SCR 24 receives the exhaust flow 16 mixed with the NH3 246 injected by the urea injector 236, and stores the NH3. The NO.sub.x gas present in the exhaust gas 16 reacts with the stored NH3. In so doing, the SCR 24 reduces the NO.sub.x contained in the exhaust gas 16 to N.sub.2 and H.sub.2O. In some operative conditions the SCR 24 may slip NH3. This feeds the NH3 to the uSCR 25, to drive a supplemental catalytic NO.sub.x reduction reaction when NO.sub.x escapes from the first SCR 24. The NH3 stored in SCR 24 and uSCR 25 comes from the urea injector 236; the NH3 stored by uSCR 25 coming from SCRF outlet, when the NH3 slips or escapes from SCR 24.

[0033] The uSCR 25 receives the exhaust flow 16 from the SCR 24. The uSCR 25 contributes to a further reduction of the NO.sub.x in the exhaust flow 16 by continuously storing the NH3 ammonia slipped from the SCR 24 and making it react with the NO.sub.x downstream of the SCR 24. The interaction of the two reduction systems SCR 24 and uSCR 25 leads to a substantial reduction of NOx emissions if a suitable amount of reductant 246 (urea NH3) has been injected by the urea injector 236. Any number of events may slightly diminish the NO.sub.x conversion efficiency of the SCR 24 and permit NO.sub.x to reach the uSCR 25 by way of the exhaust flow 16. The NO.sub.x that passes through (i.e. slips) the SCR 24 is reduced by the ammonia stored at the uSCR 25. The ability of the uSCR 25 to accommodate variances in the chemical composition of the exhaust flow 16 and out-of-phase concentration spikes in NO.sub.x and ammonia helps limit the escape of these two substances to atmosphere.

[0034] The oxygen storage material included in the uSCR 25 provides a reserve oxygen supply that enhances the catalytic reduction reaction between ammonia and NO.sub.x. The oxygen storage material absorbs oxygen from the low-oxygen content exhaust flow 16 when NO.sub.x is not present. The accumulated oxygen is then extracted to supplement the sparingly available oxygen in the exhaust flow 16. This influx of reserve oxygen achieves NO.sub.x reduction efficiency gains in several ways. First, the extra oxygen improves the overall reaction kinetics of the NO.sub.x reduction reactions (both NO and NO.sub.2) since oxygen scarcity can have a rate-limiting effect. Second, the extra oxygen promotes the oxidation of NO to NO.sub.2. This oxidation reaction decreases the NO to NO.sub.2 molar ratio of the NO.sub.x in the uSCR 25. Such an adjustment is desirable since the overall reduction of NO.sub.x generally proceeds more efficiently when the NO/NO.sub.2 molar ratio is decreased from that originally produced by the engine 12 to, preferably, about 1.0 (equimolar).

[0035] FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of the reductant injection control system 84 according to one or more embodiments. It should be noted that FIG. 2 depicts a simplified view of the exhaust system and does not depict one or more components, such as the DOC 22. It should be further noted that in one or more embodiments the reductant injection control system 84 may include additional components than those depicted, and that the depicted block diagram is to describe the technical solutions herein. The SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 receive a reductant 246, such as at variable dosing rates. Reductant 246 can be supplied from a reductant supply source 234. In one or more examples, the reductant 246 is injected into exhaust gas conduit 14 at a location upstream of the SCR 24 using a urea injector 236. The reductant 246 can be in the form of a gas, a liquid, or an aqueous solution, such as an aqueous urea solution. In one or more examples, the reductant 246 can be mixed with air in the injector 236 to aid in the dispersion of the injected spray. The SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 utilize the reductant 246 to reduce the NOx in exhaust 16.

[0036] The reductant injection control system 84 further includes the control module 238 operably connected, via a number of sensors, to monitor the engine 12, FIG. 1, and the SCR devices 24 and 25. As used herein, the term module refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality. For example, the control module 238 can execute a SCR chemical model, as described below. The control module 238 can be operably connected to the engine 12, the SCR 24, the urea injector 236, the uSCR 25, and/or one or more sensors.

[0037] The sensors can include a first NO.sub.x sensor 242, a second NO.sub.x sensor 243, and a third NOx sensor 244, each of which are in fluid communication with the exhaust gas conduit 14. The NO.sub.x sensors 242, 243, 244 detect a NO.sub.x level proximate their location within exhaust gas conduit, and generate a NOx signal, which corresponds to the NOx level. A NOx level can comprise a concentration, a mass flow rate, or a volumetric flow rate, in some embodiments. A NOx signal generated by a NOx sensor can be interpreted by the control module 238, for example. The control module 238 can additionally be in communication with one or more temperature sensors, such as temperature sensor 32, FIG. 1. In one or more examples, the first NOx sensor 242 may be disposed downstream of the engine 12, at DOC inlet or at DOC outlet, to measure the NOx concentration upstream of SCR 24 so as to detect NOx level at the inlet of the SCR 24. In the last case, since a NOx sensor is cross-sensitive to ammonia NH3, the NOx sensor 242 is disposed before the urea injector 236; the second NOx sensor 243 is disposed downstream of the SCR 24 and upstream of the uSCR 25 to detect NOx level at the inlet of the uSCRF 25 (or the outlet of the SCR 24); and the third NOx sensor 244 is disposed downstream of the uSCR 25 to detect NOx level at the outlet of the uSCR 25. In one or more examples, the first NOx sensor 242 is located upstream of the DOC 22, the second NOx sensor 243 is at the outlet of SCR 24, and the third NOx sensor 244 is at the outlet of uSCR 25. It should be noted that the positions of the sensors depicted in FIG. 2 are illustrative, and that in one or more embodiments, the sensors may be in different positions than those depicted. Further, in one or more embodiments, a different number of sensors may be used than those depicted herein.

[0038] The reductant 246 can be any compound capable of decomposing or reacting in the presence of exhaust gas 16 and/or heat to form ammonia. When the urea is injected into the hot exhaust gas 16, the water evaporates and the urea thermally decomposes into NH.sub.3 and CO.sub.2. The NH.sub.3 molecules then are stored in SCR 24 or uSCR 25 components to perform the NOx reduction.

[0039] Equations (1)-(5) provide exemplary chemical reactions for NO.sub.x reduction involving ammonia.

6NO+4NH.sub.3.fwdarw.5N.sub.2+6H.sub.2O(1)

4NO+4NH.sub.3+O.sub.2.fwdarw.4N.sub.2+6H.sub.2O(2)

6NO.sub.2+8NH.sub.3.fwdarw.7N.sub.2+12H.sub.2O(3)

2NO.sub.2+4NH.sub.3+O.sub.2.fwdarw.3N.sub.2+6H.sub.2O(4)

NO+NO.sub.2+2NH.sub.3.fwdarw.2N.sub.2+3H.sub.2O(5)

[0040] It should be appreciated that Equations (1)-(5) are merely illustrative, and are not meant to confine the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 to a particular NOx reduction mechanism or mechanisms, nor preclude the operation of other mechanisms. The SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 can be configured to perform any one of the above NOx reduction reactions, combinations of the above NOx reduction reactions, and other NO.sub.x reduction reactions.

[0041] The reductant 246 can be diluted with water in various implementations. In implementations where the reductant 246 is diluted with water, heat (e.g., from the exhaust) evaporates the water, and ammonia is supplied to the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25. Non-ammonia reductants can be used as a full or partial alternative to ammonia as desired. Reaction (6) below provides an exemplary general chemical reaction of ammonia production via evaporation and urea decomposition.

(NH.sub.2).sub.2CO+H.sub.2O.fwdarw.2NH.sub.3+CO.sub.2(6)

[0042] It should be appreciated that Equation (6) is merely illustrative, and is not meant to confine the urea or other reductant 246 decomposition to a particular single mechanism, nor preclude the operation of other mechanisms.

[0043] Modeling and optimizing the operation of the two components, SCR 24 and uSCR 25, is a technical challenge addressed by the technical solutions described herein. In addition, the technical solutions described herein facilitate controlling the operation of both, the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25, and the resulting NOx from the exhaust gas treatment system 10, with only one reductant (urea) injector 236 located upstream of SCR 24. The technical solutions accordingly facilitate a systematic and modular control approach to manage, in a flexible way, both the SCR 24, and the uSCR 25 architectures with a single controller module 238. The technical solutions described herein facilitate such flexibility by using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach that considers the uSCR 25 and optimizes overall performance of the exhaust gas treatment system 10, while acting only on the single unique urea injector 236.

[0044] The controller module 238 extends the MPC beyond just the SCR 24 to optimally determine the urea injection (constrained by the presence of only one single urea injector), while optimizing the trade-off between NOx and NH3 chemical species both at the SCR 24 and uSCR 25 outlets.

[0045] FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart of an example method for determining an amount of reductant 246 to inject into the exhaust gas treatment system 10 according to one or more embodiments. The method 300 is implemented by the controller module 238. In one or more examples, the controller module 238 executes one or more computer executable instructions that are stored on a computer readable storage device to implement the method. Alternatively, or in addition, the implementation includes the controller module 238 operating according to one or more application specific integrated circuits or field programmable gate array configurations.

[0046] The method 300 includes determining if the uSCR 25 is present and is to be supplied reductant by the reductant injection, at 305. The determination may be made based on a predetermined flag that is indicative if the uSCR 25 is included in the exhaust gas treatment system 10. If the uSCR 25 is not to be controlled, the method 300 includes reading a first set of input signals, at 310. The first set of input signals includes, measurement signals from the first NOx sensor 242 and the second NOx sensor 243. The first set of input signals can further include temperature measurement of the SCR 24, and a gas mass flow rate, denoted by F, in the SCR 24.

[0047] The method further includes estimating an NH3 and NOx output of the SCR 24, at 320. The estimation includes using an SCR state observer model of the operation of the SCR 24. The SCR state observer may include a model based prediction and correction stage. The estimation includes computing an estimated NH3 storage level of the SCR 24, and further computing an estimate of NOx and an estimate of NH3 at the outlet of the SCR 24. The SCR state estimation uses an SCR physics model given as follows:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}\{\begin{array}{c}x\left(k+1\right)=x.Math.\left(k\right)+T_s\left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{M_{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3}}.Math.\left(u\left(k\right)-y_2\left(k\right)\right)-\frac{1}{M_{\mathrm{NOx}}}\\ \left(C_{\mathrm{Nox},\mathrm{in}}\left(k\right)-y_1\left(k\right)\right)-a_1\left(k\right).Math.x\left(k\right)\end{array}\right)\\ y_1\left(k\right)=\frac{F\left(k\right).Math.C_{\mathrm{NOx},\mathrm{in}}\left(k\right)}{F\left(k\right)+a_2\left(k\right).Math.x\left(k\right)}\\ y_2\left(k\right)=\frac{F\left(k\right).Math.\left(u\left(k\right)+a_4\left(k\right).Math.x\left(k\right)\right)}{F\left(k\right)+a_5-a_3.Math.x\left(k\right)}\end{array}& \left(7\right)\end{array}$

[0048] Here, x(k) is an estimated NH3 storage level at the SCR 24 at time interval k, T.sub.s is the sampling or scheduling time at which the aftertreatment control module is iterated in control module 238, u(k) is the amount of reductant injected, y.sub.1 is the concentration of NO.sub.x at the second NO.sub.x sensor 243, and y.sub.2 is the concentration of NH.sub.3 at the outlet of the SCR 24. Further, the estimation uses the concentration of NO.sub.x (C.sub.NOx,in) at the SCR inlet from the first NOx sensors 242. F(k) represents the exhaust flow measurement (it may be an estimate) in the SCR 24 at the k-th time instant. Further, the estimation uses multiple pre-calibrated temperature dependent reaction functions a.sub.1-a.sub.5. In the above equation M.sub.NOx and M.sub.NH3 represent the molar mass of NOx and the molar mass of NH3, respectively.

[0049] Referring to the flowchart of FIG. 3 again, the method 300 includes optimizing the amount of reductant (u(k)) that is injected by the reductant injector 236, into the exhaust gas 16, at 330. The controller computes the amount of reductant u(k) to be injected into the exhaust gas, to optimally operate the reduction systems SCR 24 in order to maintain the NOx and NH3 emissions at the outlet of the SCR 24 as low as possible:

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}u\left(k\right)=f\left(\underset{u}{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_{\mathrm{in}.Math.\text{-}.Math.k},.Math..Math.\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_{\mathrm{in}.Math.\text{-}.Math.k},\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_k,{\mathrm{NOx}}_k,\mathrm{wi}}\right)& \left(8\right)\end{array}$

[0050] Here, wi terms represent weight calibrations, with w.sub.u being a weight calibration for the amount of urea to be injected NH.sub.3in, w.sub.du being a weight calibration for ensuring a low variation of the injection pattern of reductant. Further, w.sub.NOx,SCRF and W.sub.NH3,SCRF are weight calibrations based on a tradeoff between NOx and NH.sub.3 at the outlet of the SCR 24. The control module 238 determines the optimal amount of reductant 246 to be injected so as to minimize a cost function that expresses the system performance, for example a combination of NOx and NH3 concentrations at SCR 24 outlets, NOx reduction efficiency, urea injection efforts, among other factors, at 340 and 350.

[0051] Referring to the flowchart of FIG. 3 again if it is determined that the uSCR 25 is to be controlled (i.e. the uSCR 25 is part of the exhaust gas treatment system 10; at 305) the method 300 includes receiving a second input set, at 360; else, only the SCRF 24 is used, at 340. The second input set includes the NOx sensor readings from the first NOx sensor 242, the second NOx sensor 243, and the third NOx sensor 244, the third reading being from the uSCR outlet. The second input set further includes the SCR 24 temperature and an uSCR 25 temperature measured by the one or more temperature sensors at the respective devices. Further, the second input set includes the gas mass flow rates through the SCR 24 and through the uSCR 25.

[0052] Further, the method includes a model based observer to estimate one or more values for the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25, at 370. The estimation includes computing an NH3 storage level at the SCR 24 and at the uSCR 25. Further, the estimation includes computing NOx and NH3 at the SCR outlet and at the uSCR outlet. The estimations can be based on the following physic-based equation for the uSCR:

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}{x}_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k+1\right)=x_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)+T_s\left(\frac{1}{M_{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3}}.Math.\left(C_{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3,\mathrm{in},\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)-y_{2,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\right)-\frac{1}{M_{\mathrm{NOx}}}.Math.\left(C_{\mathrm{NOx},\mathrm{in},\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)-y_{1,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\right)-a_{1,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right).Math.x_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\right)& \left(9\right)\\ .Math.y_{1,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)=\frac{F_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right).Math.C_{\mathrm{NOx},\mathrm{in},\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)}{F_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)+a_{2,\mathrm{uSCR}}.Math.x_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)}& \left(10\right)\\ .Math.y_{2,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)=\frac{F_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right).Math.\left(C_{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3,\mathrm{in},\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)+a_{4,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right).Math.x_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\right)}{F_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)+a_{5,\mathrm{uSCR}}-a_{3,\mathrm{uSCR}}.Math.x_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)}& \left(11\right)\end{array}$

[0053] Here, the C.sub.NH3,in,uSCR (k) is the y.sub.2(k) from equation (7) and C.sub.NOx,in,uSCR(k) is the y.sub.1(k) from the equation (7). y.sub.1,uSCR(k) and y.sub.2,uSCR(k) represent the concentration of NOx and NH3 concentration at the uSCR outlet, respectively.

[0054] The method 300 further includes optimizing the amount of reductant (u(k)) that is injected by the reductant injector 236, at 380. The optimization includes linearizing a combination of the SCR model and the uSCR model from the equations (7) and (9). The linearized model of the combination of the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25 can be expressed as follows:

[00004]$x\left(k+1\right)=A\left(p\left(k\right)\right).Math.x\left(k\right)+B_u\left(p\left(k\right)\right).Math.u\left(k\right)$$y\left(k\right)=C\left(p\left(k\right)\right).Math.x\left(k\right),.Math.\mathrm{where}.Math.\text{:}$$x\left(k\right)=\left[\begin{array}{c}.Math.\left(k\right)\\ u\left(k-1\right)\\ {}_{\mathrm{UF}}.Math.{}_{\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\end{array}\right]$$u\left(k\right)=C_{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3,\mathrm{in}}\left(k\right)$$A\left(p\left(k\right)\right)=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{A}_{11}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0\\ A_{21}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0& A_{22}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\end{array}\right]$$B_u\left(p\left(k\right)\right)=\left[\begin{array}{c}{B}_1\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\\ 1\\ B_2\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\end{array}\right];$$C\left(p\left(k\right)\right)=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{C}_1\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0& 0\\ C_2\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& D_2\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0\\ C_3\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0& 0\\ C_m\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& D_m\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0\\ C_{12.Math.\_.Math.1}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& 0& C_{12.Math.\_.Math.2}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\\ C_{22.Math.\_.Math.1}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& D_{22}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& C_{22.Math.\_.Math.2}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\\ 0& 0& C_{32.Math.\_.Math.2}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\\ C_{m.Math..Math.2.Math.\_.Math.1}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& D_{m.Math..Math.2}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)& C_{m.Math..Math.2.Math.\_.Math.2}\left(p\left(k\right)\right)\end{array}\right];\mathrm{and}$$y\left(k\right)=\left[\begin{array}{c}{y}_1\left(k\right)\\ y_2\left(k\right)\\ y_3\left(k\right)\\ y_4\left(k\right)\\ y_{1,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\\ y_{2,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\\ y_{3,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\\ y_{4,\mathrm{uSCR}}\left(k\right)\end{array}\right].$

[0055] Here, is the NH3 storage capacity of the SCR 24, (k) is the NH.sub.3 storage level at the SCR 24 at time k, .sub.UF is the NH.sub.3 storage capacity of the uSCR 25, .sub.uSCR(k) is the NH.sub.3 storage level at the uSCR 25 at time k.

[0056] The method 300 includes optimizing the amount of reductant (u(k)) that is injected into the exhaust gas 16 by the reductant injector 236, at 390. The optimization includes solving at real time a numerical optimization problem to determine the optimal amount of urea to be injected so as to minimize a cost function that expresses the system performance. For example, the cost function can include a combination of NOx and NH3 concentrations at SCR outlet and/or uSCR outlet, NOx reduction efficiency, urea injection efforts, and other such parameters described herein.

[00005]$\begin{array}{cc}u\left(k\right)=\arg .Math..Math.\underset{\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_{\mathrm{in}}}{\min }.Math..Math.f\left(\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_{\mathrm{in}},\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_k,{\mathrm{NOx}}_k,{\mathrm{NOx}}_{\mathrm{UF},k},\mathrm{NH}.Math..Math.3_{\mathrm{UF},k},w_i,,{}_{}\right)& \left(12\right)\end{array}$

[0057] Here, in addition to the terms from equation (8), the w terms include, w.sub.NOx,uSCR and W.sub.NH3,uSCR, which are weight calibrations for NOx measurement at the outlet of the uSCR 25 and an estimated for NH.sub.3 at the outlet of the uSCR 25, respectively. The controller module 238 accordingly is responsible for computing an optimal amount of reductant to inject to maintain a first predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of SCR 24 and to maintain a second predetermined ratio between the amount of NH3 and the amount of NOx at the outlet of the uSCR 25.

[0058] The optimization can be solved by using linear and nonlinear programming techniques to determine the amount of reductant 246 to be injected by computing the minimal u(k) per equation (12). The method 300 hence, includes determining the optimal level of reductant 246 to be injected into the exhaust gas treatment system 10, at 350. In one or more examples, the optimal level of the reductant 246 is the minimum u(k) that is computed by optimizing the expressions in equation (12) (or in case without the uSCR the equation (8)).

[0059] The controller module 238 instructs the injector 236 to inject the corresponding amount of reductant 246 according to the computed u(k) value. The injector 236 injects the commanded amount of reductant 246 into the exhaust gas treatment system 10 in response.

[0060] The technical solutions described herein facilitate improvements to emissions control systems used with internal combustion engines, such as those used in vehicles. For example, the technical solutions provide a control strategy that optimizes the overall performance of the exhaust gas treatment system composed of an SCR 24 and a uSCR 25 to maintain tailpipe NOx emissions within a predetermined range, and by using only a single reductant (urea) injector 236, at 340. Further, the technical solutions facilitate the controller module 238 to operate based on a calibration value that indicates whether the controller module 238 computes an amount of reductant for only the SCR 24 or a combination of both the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25. The system automatically handles the selected configuration without any manual intervention.

[0061] The technical solutions described herein accordingly optimize the performance of the entire exhaust gas treatment system 10 including the two SCR devices, the SCR 24 and the uSCR 25, using a single reductant injector 236. The single reductant injector is controlled to inject a computed amount of reductant that may directly be injected at a first SCR device, such as the SCR 24 and indirectly at the second SCR device, such as the uSCR 25. The reductant amount is computed using a physics-based model and the amount of reductant is computed in real time by solving a numerical programming problem in the ECM processor. Accordingly, the technical solutions described herein provide a systematic and modular control approach to manage, in a flexible way, both, SCR and/or SCR+uSCR architectures with a single optimal controller and injector system.

[0062] While the above disclosure has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from its scope. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but will include all embodiments falling within the scope thereof.