POLYMERIC SURFACTANTS HAVING INCREASED SALT TOLERANCE AND METHOD OF PREPARATION THEREOF

Abstract

A polymeric surfactant for use in chemical enhanced oil recovery, including a terpolymer of a first non-ionic monomer, a second non-ionic monomer, and an ionic monomer, the first non-ionic monomer being a hydrophilic monomer and the second non-ionic monomer being a hydrophobic monomer, the ionic monomer being in a lower proportion than the first and second non-ionic monomers. A method of preparation of polymeric surfactants.

Claims

1. A surfactant comprising a terpolymer of a first non-ionic monomer, a second non-ionic monomer, and an ionic monomer, wherein the first non-ionic monomer is a hydrophilic monomer and the second non-ionic monomer is a hydrophobic monomer and the ionic monomer is in a lower proportion than the first and second non-ionic monomers.

2. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein first non-ionic monomer is a poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate having a number-average molecular weight (Mn) selected from 480 g/mol, 500 g/mol and 950 g/mol.

3. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein the second non-ionic monomer is selected from dodecyl methacrylate, n-octadecyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, t-butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, 2-(diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate, styrene and mixtures thereof

4. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein the ionic monomer is selected from sodium methacrylate, [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride, a 3-sulfopropyl methacrylate potassium salt, [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide and mixtures thereof.

5. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of first non-ionic monomer to total monomer is between 0.3 and 0.5.

6. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of second non-ionic monomer to total monomer is between 0.4 and 0.8.

7. The surfactant of claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of ionic monomer to total monomer is between 0.01 and 0.15.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0022] FIG. 1 Shows surface tension values as a function of sample concentration for different compositions of hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers.

[0023] FIG. 2 shows surface tension values as a function of sample concentration for different compositions of hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers with different compositions of ionic monomer.

[0024] FIG. 3 shows the instability of the surfactant polymer without the incorporation of the ionic monomer in a salt medium between 10,000 ppm and 90,000 ppm at a temperature between 20 and 95° C.

[0025] FIG. 4 shows the stability of the surfactant polymer with the incorporation of the ionic monomer in a salt medium between 10,000 ppm and 90,000 ppm at a temperature between 20 and 95° C.

[0026] FIG. 5 shows the oil/water interfacial tensions obtained in a system comprising a selected polymeric surfactant provided by the present invention.

[0027] FIG. 6 shows the recovery factors obtained in a system comprising a selected polymeric surfactant provided by the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] The surfactants provided by the present invention can be obtained using conventional polymer synthesis methods, such as methods adapted for Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP), Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer (RAFT) polymerization and Free Radical Polymerization. The polymerization mixture was prepared in a Schlenk flask dissolving non-ionic monomers, both hydrophobic, hydrophilic and ionic and purged by bubbling N.sub.2 for 50 minutes. Afterwards, the initiator and the CTA (RAFT) or complex (ATRP) were dissolved into the mixture. Polymerization temperatures were kept between 25 and 90° C., under atmospheric pressure, and after 5-10 h, the reaction mixture was dissolved. The crude polymer was purified firstly by precipitation in n-hexane, and secondly, the precipitate was dissolved in water, and the dissolution was dialyzed and freeze-dried. The order in which the monomers are added depends on the surfactant to be obtained.

[0029] The molar fraction of hydrophilic monomer in the monomer mixture can be obtained from equation (1):

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}{F}_{\mathrm{Hydrophilic}}=\frac{\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophilic}\mathrm{monomer}}{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophilic}\mathrm{monomer}+\\ \mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophobic}\mathrm{monomer}+\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Ionic}\mathrm{monomer}\end{array}}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

[0030] The molar fraction of hydrophobic monomer in the monomer mixture can be obtained from equation (2):

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}{F}_{\mathrm{Hydrophobic}}=\frac{\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophobic}\mathrm{monomer}}{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophilic}\mathrm{monomer}+\\ \mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophobic}\mathrm{monomer}+\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Ionic}\mathrm{monomer}\end{array}}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

[0031] FIG. 1 shows the values of surface tension as a function of the concentration of the sample for different compositions of hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers.

[0032] The molar fraction of ionic monomer in the monomer mixture can be obtained from equation (3):

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}{F}_{\mathrm{Ionic}}=\frac{\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophobic}\mathrm{monomer}}{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophilic}\mathrm{monomer}+\\ \mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Hydrophobic}\mathrm{monomer}+\mathrm{mmol}\mathrm{Ionic}\mathrm{monomer}\end{array}}& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

[0033] FIG. 2 shows the values of surface tension as a function of the concentration of the sample for different compositions of ionic monomers.

[0034] In preferred embodiments, the first non-ionic monomer, i.e. the hydrophilic monomer, is selected from di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylates and mixtures thereof, the poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylates preferably having number-average molecular weights (Mn) of about 480 g/mol, about 500 g/mol or about 950 g/mol and F.sub.Hydrophilic is in the range of 0.3-0.5.

[0035] In preferred embodiments, the second non-ionic monomer, i.e. the hydrophobic monomer is selected from dodecyl methacrylate, n-octadecyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, t-butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, 2-(diethylamino) ethyl methacrylate, styrene and mixtures thereof and F.sub.Hydrophobic is in the range of 0.4-0.8.In preferred embodiments, the ionic monomer is selected from sodium methacrylate, [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride, a 3-sulfopropyl methacrylate potassium salt and [2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl] dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide and mixtures thereof and F.sub.ionic is in the range of 0.01-0.15. FIGS. 3 and 4 show the polymeric surfactant with and without the ionic monomer and its relevance in saline and thermal stability. The incorporation of the ionic monomer is what allows the versatility to use this surfactant polymer in different saline media and temperatures.

[0036] The experimental results obtained for thermal stability, spinning drop and flow in rock media essays show the advantageous effect of a polymeric surfactant provided by the invention.

[0037] Surprisingly, it was found that the polymeric surfactant obtained using the monomers combinations disclosed herein, displayed an increased tolerance to highly saline aqueous phases, as well as ultra-low oil/water interfacial tension values compared with surfactants of the prior art.

[0038] The oil/water interfacial tensions at 42° C. obtained when using the selected polymeric surfactant provided by the invention are in the range of 1×10.sup.−2 mN/m to 1×10.sup.−3 mN/m for a concentration range between 0 and 100,000 ppm as shown in FIG. 5. Surfactants of the prior art having interfacial tensions of about 1×10.sup.−2 mN/m, i.e., close to the lower end of the range obtainable with the surfactant provided by the present invention. In addition, these surfactants only reach these values for interfacial tensions in a narrow salinity range. These results show the relevance of polymeric surfactants, since they provide a greater operating range with low interfacial tensions, which is a very important condition in the oil industry.

[0039] The recovery factors using the selected polymeric surfactant provided by the invention are elevated, as shown in FIG. 6. The left-hand side of FIG. 6 shows the Model Rock Plug after having been swept in a core flow experiment using the polymeric surfactant. The right-hand side shows the crude oil volume recovered by the polymeric surfactant in the first sweep with water up to residual oil saturation. For a poral volume of 15 mL, determined by both N.sub.2 and water measurements, and a displaced water volume in the trap of 13.0 mL, 3.1 mL of crude oil were dragged by the action of a water flow (crude recovered in Secondary Oil Recovery phase) and 2.7 mL of crude oil were dragged by the action of a water flow comprising the polymeric surfactant, i.e. a 87% increase.

[0040] The system comprising the polymeric surfactant provided by the invention is stable in a temperature range from room temperature, i.e. about 20° C., to 95° C. for several weeks.