METHOD OF PRODUCING COMPOSITE MEMBERS HAVING INCREASED STRENGTH

Abstract

This invention relates to extruded composite materials specifically focusing on the increasing load bearing capacity and the overall strength of composites. Injectable conformable structural core materials are used to replace foam cells inside extruded composite materials thereby increasing the overall load bearing stability and strength. The core materials are tailored to have a desired CTE with respect to the structural materials. The core materials may also incorporate fibers and solid structural fillers for increasing the strength of the composite member. The objective is to enable composite materials to have the highest structural load bearing capability possible so that these technologies can be used as the replacement of wood, in aerospace applications and for other purposes.

Claims

1-25. (canceled)

26. A method of making a foam member comprising the steps of: determining a volume expansion of an unexpanded foam material from a liquid to a solid; incorporating chopped fibers and substantially incompressible filler material into said foam material to form a foam mixture in an amount wherein said incompressible filler material comprises a volume ratio of 20% to 80% with respect to an expanded volume of said foam mixture; feeding said foam mixture through a die, wherein said foam mixture locates in a deformable structural material, said step of feeding after said step of determining said volume expansion of said foam material for preventing swelling of said deformable structure; wherein said step of feeding is after said step of determining; expanding said foam mixture; wherein said fibers contact and adhere to at least some of said filler material to act as anchoring members to said fibers; adjusting a selected amount of said filler material in said foam material to achieve a coefficient of thermal expansion of said foam material that more closely matches a coefficient of thermal expansion of a durable outer shell said structural material for significantly reducing or preventing delamination of said foam material from said durable outer shell structural material.

27. The method according to claim 26 wherein said fibers are selected from a group consisting of natural, man-made, synthetic and mineral fibers.

28. The method according to claim 26 wherein: said fibers comprise greater than approximately 4% by weight of said foam material.

29. The method according to claim 26 wherein: said volume ratio is 20% to 50%.

30. The method according to claim 26 wherein: said volume ratio is 40% to 80%.

31. The method according to claim 26 wherein: said deformable structural material is an outer shell created by said foam upon curing.

32. A method of making a member comprising the steps of: determining a volume expansion of a foam material from a liquid to a solid; incorporating fibers and rigidly solid substantially incompressible filler material into said foam material to form a foam mixture in an amount wherein said filler material comprises a volume ratio that adjusts said volume expansion of said foam mixture to more closely match a coefficient of thermal expansion of a deformable structure material; introducing said foam mixture through a die, wherein said foam mixture located in said deformable structural material, said step of introducing after said step of determining said volume expansion of said foam material for preventing swelling of said deformable structure; wherein said fibers contact and interact with at least some of said filler material, said filler material acting as anchoring members to anchor said fibers in said foam mixture, thereby strengthening the member; wherein said rigidly solid incompressible filler material interacts with said fiber throughout said foam mixture.

33. The method according to claim 32 wherein: said volume ratio of said filler material is 20% to 80% with regard to said volume expansion of said foam mixture.

34. The method according to claim 32 wherein said filler material comprises microspheres.

35. The method according to claim 32 wherein said fibers are selected from a group consisting of natural, man-made, synthetic and mineral fibers.

36. The method according to claim 32 wherein said foam material is a polyurethane composite foam.

37. The method according to claim 32 further comprising the steps of: extruding a structural material through a die to form an elongate structure that defines a durable outer shell; filling said durable outer shell with said foam material for forming a strengthened extruded composite member; wherein said fibers contact and interact with at least some of said filler material to act as anchoring members to said fibers.

38. The method according to claim 37 further comprising the steps of: determining the coefficient of thermal expansion of said structural material; and adjusting an amount of said filler material in said foam material to achieve a coefficient of thermal expansion of said foam material that more closely matches a coefficient of thermal explanation of said structural material.

39. The method according to claim 37 further comprising the steps of: determining the coefficient of thermal expansion of said structural material; adding a selected amount of said filler material to said foam material to achieve a desirable coefficient of thermal expansion of said foam material that more closely matches a coefficient of thermal explanation of said structural material.

40. The method according to claim 38 wherein said desirable coefficient of thermal expansion of said foam material is a coefficient of thermal expansion selected to reduce shear stress between said foam material and said structural material.

41. The method according to claim 32 wherein said rigidly solid incompressible filler material is selected from glass microspheres, ceramic microspheres, and mixtures thereof.

42. The method according to claim 32 wherein said rigidly solid incompressible filler material is selected from glass microspheres.

43. The method according to claim 32 wherein said rigidly solid incompressible filler material is selected from ceramic microspheres.

44. The method according to claim 32 wherein said rigidly solid incompressible material has a density of less than 40 lb./ft3.

45. The method according to claim 32 wherein: said step of introducing comprises injection molding.

46. The method according to claim 32 wherein: said step of introducing comprises cast molding.

47. The method according to claim 32 further comprising the steps of: adding a selected amount of said filler material to said foam material to achieve a coefficient of thermal expansion of said foam material that more closely matches a coefficient of thermal explanation of said deformable structural material.

48. A method of making a foam member comprising the steps of: determining an expanded foam volume of an unexpanded mixture of an unexpanded polymer material, chopped fibers and substantially incompressible filler material; calculating an optimal feed rate of said unexpanded mixture for preventing a volume mismatch with respect to a deformable structural material; feeding said unexpanded mixture through a die and expanding said unexpanded mixture to form an expanded foam mixture, wherein said filler material comprises a volume ratio of 20% to 80% with respect to a volume of said expanded foam mixture, wherein said expanded foam mixture locates in said deformable structural material; wherein said step of feeding is after said step of determining said expanded foam volume for preventing swelling of said deformable structural material; wherein said fibers contact and adhere to at least some of said filler material, said filler material acting as anchoring members to said fibers.

49. A method of making a member comprising the steps of: determining an expanded foam volume of an unexpanded mixture of unexpanded polymer material, chopped fibers and substantially incompressible filler material; calculating an optimal feed rate of said unexpanded mixture comprising said unexpanded polymer material, said fibers and said filler material for preventing a volume mismatch with respect to a deformable structural material; introducing said unexpanded mixture through a die, wherein said unexpanded mixture expands to form an expanded foam mixture, wherein said filler material comprises a volume ratio that adjusts a volume of said expanded foam mixture, to more closely match a coefficient of thermal explanation of a deformable structural material wherein said expanded mixture locates in said deformable structural material; said step of introducing is after said step of determining said expanded foam volume for preventing swelling of said deformable structural material; wherein said fibers contact and interact with at least some of said filler material, said filler material acting as anchoring members to anchor said fibers in said expanded foam mixture, for strengthening the member; wherein said filler material interacts with said fibers throughout said expanded foam mixture; adjusting a selected amount of said filler material in said unexpanded mixture to achieve a desirable coefficient of thermal expansion of said expanded foam mixture with respect to said deformable structural material for reducing a difference in a coefficient of thermal expansion between the expanded foam mixture and the deformable structural material for significantly reducing or preventing delamination of said expanded foam mixture from said deformable structural material.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an extrusion die with internal support structures for added mechanical stability and strength;

[0040] FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member extruded from the die of FIG. 1;

[0041] FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an extrusion die having an injection system for filling void areas of an extruded member with a conformable core structural material;

[0042] FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member that has void areas filled by injectable conformable structural core material;

[0043] FIGS. 5a & 5b are cross-sectional views of extruded members having a configuration labeled model 1. FIG. 5a shows the extruded member with empty voids, while FIG. 5b shows the extruded member having voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0044] FIGS. 6a & 6b are cross-sectional views of extruded members having a configuration labeled model 2. FIG. 6a shows the extruded member with empty voids, while FIG. 6b shows the extruded member having voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0045] FIGS. 7a & 7b are cross-sectional views of extruded members having a configuration labeled model 3. FIG. 7a shows the extruded member with empty voids, while FIG. 7b shows the extruded member having voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0046] FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member suitable for use as a support post, wherein the post has voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0047] FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member suitable for use as a support post, wherein the post has voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0048] FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member suitable for use as a support post, wherein the post has voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0049] FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of an extruded member suitable for use as a support post, wherein the post has voids filled with a conformable core material.

[0050] FIG. 12 is a stress analysis representation of the solid beam of FIG. 8.

[0051] FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of a structural core material with the presence of fiber interaction throughout a microsphere foam matrix.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0052] Before explaining the present invention in detail, it is important to understand that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the embodiments and steps described herein. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in a variety of ways. It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.

[0053] Referring now to FIG. 1, a cross-section of prior art extrusion die 10 is shown. Extrusion die 10 includes external die element 12 and internal die elements 14 that define die walls 16. Die walls 16 define channels 18 through which a molten material is forced. Once the molten material is forced out of the die 10, the material cools, resulting in an extruded member, e.g., extruded member 19, shown in cross-section in FIG. 2.

[0054] Referring now to FIG. 3, an improved extrusion die 20 is shown. Extrusion die 20 includes external die element 22 and internal die elements 24 that define die walls 26. Die walls 26 define channels 28, through which material is forced. Injector paths 30 are provided in internal die elements 24 for facilitating the introduction of a core material, such as a foam or other material. Therefore, molten material is forced through channels 28 and out of die 20 while the extruded member is simultaneously filled with core material. The result is extruded member 32 (FIG. 4) having core material 34 located therein.

[0055] Referring now to FIGS. 5a-7b, composite members 36, 38, 40 and 42 are shown in FIGS. 5b, 6b and 7b with voids filled with core material 34. Composite members 36, 38, 40 and 42 may be extruded having various internal support configurations. For example, composite member 36 is shown with an internal structure having both vertical supports 42 and diagonal supports 44 wherein voids are filled with core material 34 (FIG. 5b). Composite member 38 is shown having diagonal supports 46 forming voids that are filled with core material 34 (FIG. 6b). Composite member 40 is shown having a plurality of vertical internal supports 48 filled with core material 34 (FIG. 7b). Other configurations are also possible.

[0056] As may be seen in FIGS. 8-11, composite structural beams 50, 52, 54 and 56 are shown having various internal support structures, wherein the beams are filled with core material 34. For example, beam 50 is shown with no internal supports and is filled with core material 34 (FIG. 8). Beam 52 is shown having diagonal supports 58 and right angled supports 60 and is filled with core material 34 (FIG. 9). Beam 54 is shown having a first and second right angled support 62, which define four equal sized voids filled with core material 34 (FIG. 10). Beam 56 is shown having four right angled supports 64, which define nine voids filled with core material 34 (FIG. 11). Other internal support configurations are possible.

[0057] In one embodiment, e.g. the embodiment of FIGS. 2 and 4, injectable conformable structural core material 34 is fed into extrusion die 20 (FIG. 3) through injector paths 30 while structural material is forced through die 20. During an extrusion process, an optimal feed rate must be determined. As an example, the structural geometry of an extruded member is an exemplary square tube having dimensions of 1 inch by 1 inch and a wall thickness of 0.2 in. In a preferred extrusion process, the feed rate of injectable conformable structural core material is calculated to allow optimum performance without detrimentally increasing stress on the composite member. As an example, a rigid polyurethane foam or Styreenfoam may be used as the injectable conformable structural core material, i.e., a foam manufactured by Bayer, Baydur 726 IBS. Other materials may also be used as discussed below. To calculate the optimum feed rate, the following steps are followed.

[0058] Step 1 calculates the expansion rate of foam from liquid to solid. The following assumptions may be used with respect to foam properties:

1 g=4.0 cm.sup.3 approximately based on free rise density of the foam

1 g=(4.0 cm.sup.3(1 in.sup.3/(2.45 cm).sup.3))=0.27 in.sup.3

[0059] Step 2 calculates the void volumes that are being filled per linear foot basis.

1 ft=12 in

Void Volume per foot=(12 in)(1 in)(1 in)=12 in.sup.3

[0060] Step 3 calculates the extrusion rate per foot of the composite material. This calculation is based on equipment driven parameters. For purposes of this example the extrusion rate of the composite material is assumed to be 10 ft/min.

[0061] Step 4 determines the liquid injection rate of the unexpanded foam to match the extrusion rate of the composite. The expansion calculations in Step 1, the void volume calculation in Step 2 and the extrusion rate calculated in Step 3 are used in determining Step 4. The calculated liquid flow rate will allow the composite material to fill the structure completely without swelling resulting from volume expansion mismatch or creating voids in the internal structure. The expansion calculations in Step 1, the calculation in Step 2 and the extrusion rate in Step 3 allows the calculation of the liquid injection rate of the unexpanded foam to match the extrusion rate of the composite.

10 ft/min(12 in.sup.3/1 ft)(1 g/0.27 in.sup.3)=444 g/min

[0062] The calculated liquid flow rate of 444 g/min of unreacted foam material to fill 10 extruded board feet per minute allows the composite material to fill the structure completely without swelling resulting from volume expansion mismatch and without creating voids in the structural composite material. This example focused on the expansion characteristics of a foam without fiber and structural fillers because they do not change physical volume upon injection.

[0063] Most foams are two-part and are highly reactive. Therefore, mass flow controllers or volume flow controllers may be used in conjunction with the extruded material to control the injection system so that the process can be controlled or stopped at any time.

[0064] In one embodiment, the core material 34 is manually injected into structural voids or channels of an extruded member and excess core material 34 is trimmed off at the end of the process. If a closed structure is manually filled, there exists a possibility that the extruded member will be deformed by over expansion of injectable core material 34 inside the extruded member. While reactive materials like foam may be used as injectable conformable structural core material 34, non-active materials, such as gels, are also contemplated to fall within the scope of the invention.

[0065] Referring now to Tables 1-12, stress tests were conducted on extruded members of various structural materials and, various configurations, with and without a core material. The planks were supported with supports spaced 16 inches apart. The members each have outside dimensions of 5 inches by 1 inches. The internal structures and walls of the members have a wall thickness of 0.2 inches. The extruded members were secured with rigidly fixed ends and subjected to a test load of 500 lbf delivered by a 5 inches long by 1 wide inches member over the width of the plank centered between the supports.

[0066] Table 1 shows data for an extruded member for Model 1, i.e., an extruded member having both vertical and diagonal internal support members (see, FIGS. 5a, 5b). The structural material of the extruded member consists of PolyOne Duraflec LD800 Vinyl compound-Rigid (RPVC). In case 1, the member was tested with no core material present (see FIG. 5a). As can be seen from Table 1, the maximum deflection experienced by the member during testing was 0.0229 inches. In case 25, a member having identical construction but filled with a core material of Bayer material Science Baydure STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled experienced a deflection of only 0.00944. In case 45, a member having identical construction but filled with a core material of Bayer material Science Baydure STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled experienced a deflection of only 0.00706. Therefore, it can be seen that the foam filled structures exhibit an increased resistance to deflection, i.e., exhibit greater strength. Further, it can be seen that by increasing the glass fiber content, the amount of deflection decreases further, i.e., the strength of the member further increases. This trend may be observed for each of the geometric configurations of the extruded members, i.e., by reference to each of Tables 1-12. For certain materials and configurations, e.g., materials and configurations referenced by Tables 2 and 9, the performance increase by increasing the percentage of glass filler was negligible. It is believed that further increases in testing force would have brought out strength differences in the members having foams of 45% glass filled and 60% glass filled. This illustrates also where cost savings can be applied by decreasing the wall thickness of the PVC and increasing the void volume with foam.

[0067] In summary, Tables 1-12 illustrate that improved strength of a composite member may be achieved by incorporating fibers into the core material.

[0068] The interaction of thermal sag of the thermal plastic material in relationship to the thermal expansion of the internal core material may be considered to select an ideal foam for use with a particular plastic. As internal cross members of a structural member and the exterior structure undergo mechanical weakening as the temperature increases, a selected internal core material having an optimal coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) with a high deflection temperature will improve the rigidity and the mechanical strength of the combined composite.

[0069] One method of controlling CTE is by adding structural fillers. For example, adding microspheres to be mixed with the foam. The addition of 40%-50% by volume glass microspheres will lower the weight of the core material and will decrease the CTE by approximately 40% to 50%. Glass microspheres have advantageous properties including the fact that the microspheres are rigidly solid, i.e., substantially incompressible, and have excellent adhesion inside a polyurethane matrix. Glass microspheres are chemically and thermally stable with near zero water absorption depending on the manufacture. Glass microsphere particle size allows excellent machining capability with smooth surfaces.

[0070] The addition of a selected amount of glass microspheres allows the resulting foam core to be tailored to have a desired CTE with respect to the CTE of the structural material. Examples of CTEs of known materials may be found in Table A, below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE A CTE, linear Category 20 C. PolyOne Duraflex LD800 Vinyl Compound- 61.2 m/m- C. Rigid (RPVC) Bayer 90 m/m- C. Generic Advantage 5.8 m/m- C. PolyOne Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound - 39.6 m/m- C. Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled PolyOne Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound - 30.6 m/m- C. Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled PolyOne Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound - Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Bayer Material Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, 14 m/m- C. Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled, MDI-based 2-Component Liquid System Bayer Material Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, 26 m/m- C. Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled, MDI-based 2-Component Liquid System North Wood Plastics HDPE with 20% Wood Fiber North Wood Plastics HDPE with 40% Wood Fiber 58 m/m- C. North Wood Plastics HDPE with 60% Wood Fiber 36 m/m- C. North Wood Plastics HDPE + UNIFILL 60% (20% Wood Fiber) North Wood Plastics HDPE + UNIFILL 60% (40% Wood Fiber) PolyOne Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- 61.2 m/m- C. Rigid (RPVC) Bayer Material Science Baydur 726 IBS, 90 m/m- C. Polyurethane Structural Foam RIM, Density 55 pcf, MDI-based 2-Component Liquid System Generic Advantex Glass Fiber 5.8 m/m- C.

[0071] In the below example, structural fillers are used to reduce the CTE and the density of a composite core material. Table B, below, shows microsphere foam ratios and the CTE of the foam material at different microsphere concentrations.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE B Particle Isostatic Crush 20% filled 30% filled 40% filled 50% filled Size/microns Strength CTE um/mC 73 64 55.5 47 K1 0.728 0.625 0.576 0.5 120: 250 psi K15 0.734 0.661 0.588 0.515 115: 300 psi K20 0.744 0.676 0.608 0.54 120: 500 psi K25 0.754 0.691 0.628 0.565 105: 750 psi K37 0.778 0.723 0.676 0.625 85: 3,000 psi K46 0.796 0.754 0.712 0.67 80: 6,000 psi

[0072] The CTE of a known PVC material, e.g., PolyOne Duraflec LD800 Vinyl CompoundRigid (RPVC) is known to be 61.2:m/m- C. according to ASTM D696 (from Table A, above). Table B, immediately above, shows properties of a particular example foam, i.e., Bayer Bayder 726IBS Rigid Polyeurathane Foam having a starting reference of a density of 0.88 g/cc prior to structural fillers being added and has a CTE of 90:m/m- C. By tailoring the amount of structural fillers, in this case 3M Scotchlite Glass Bubbles K Series having a CTE of 3.3:m/m- C., a selected amount of structural filler can be incorporated into the foam to create a resulting foam wherein the CTE of the PVC structural material and the CTE of the foam core may be optimized. In this example, the amount of filler required to optimize CTEs is between 30% or 40% filled. In this example, a 40% fill using K20 microspheres results in a foam CTE of 55.5:m/m- C. The new combined density is 0.608 g/cc.

[0073] Although the above example shows how the CTE of the structural material and the foam core may be selected to reduce CTE differences, it is contemplated that any desired relationship of the CTE of the structural material and the foam core may be selected to achieve a desired result.

[0074] Referring now to FIG. 13, shown are microspheres 100 combined with chopped fibers 102 to allow new innovations and further enhance structural stability within composite foam 104. Cellular foam structure 104 of polyurethane can be tailored by varying the blowing agent. The influence of solid fillers, such as microspheres 100, combined with the presence of fibers 102 will greatly strengthen the overall composite. For example, an inch chopped fiber 102 having a diameter of 7 microns may be located inside of foam 104 having a volume ratio of 50% microspheres 100 and 50% foam 104 by volume. The fiber 102 will contact and adhere to the microspheres 100. The largest microsphere 100 that 3M makes is 120 microns. The inch fiber 102 inside of the 50% solid foam matrix would therefore have a possibility of contacting and adhering to the surface of 5,200 microspheres 100. The foam material 104 has elastomeric properties and the solid particles 100 do not. Therefore, solid particles 100 will act like an anchoring system with a fiber 102 in the foam matrix, which will limit the degree of freedom that the fiber 102 has to move inside the resin matrix. This phenomenon reduces the amount of fibers 102 necessary to increase the stiffness because of the anchoring nature of the solid material 100 interacting with the fibers 102 inside the micron structural geometry.

[0075] Utilizing the above described method, it can be seen that structural foams may be tailored to meet the needs of the aerospace industry. Generally, the criteria for aerospace structural foam composites include thermal stability and low CTE, low density and lightweight (10 to 15 lbs/ft.sup.3), structural rigidity, good internal strength, operating temperatures above 170 F., machineable, closed cell, low water absorption, controllable cure time, chemically stable, excellent adhesion for epoxies, and materials that can be cast molded to any length.

[0076] When designing structural core materials for aerospace, the microspheres will need to be added at a high percentage rate, e.g., 40%-80% by volume in order to lower the CTE and the overall density of the structural core material.

[0077] Fiber additives may be incorporated into this design application in small amounts if necessary to increase mechanical dimensional stability throughout the core material. The drawback of adding fiber is that the addition of fiber increases the weight of the composite member. Therefore, small amounts of appropriately selected chopped fibers may be used, i.e., from 4% to 10% by mass, as a starting point, should be sufficient, to achieve desired structural performance. Short chopped glass fibers with a small diameter in the micron range provide benefits of low moisture absorption with chemical, mechanical, and thermally stability. Further, the resulting composite is machinable, and chopped glass fibers provide excellent adhesion with urethanes.

[0078] The above described methods may be used to produce composite lumber having desirable attributes. Composite lumber utilizing the methods of the invention may be produced having excellent thermal mechanical stability up to or higher then 170 F., low moisture absorption, cost savings reducing structural materials, a controllable cure time to maximize production, fire retardant properties, insect resistant properties, fungal resistant properties, and that cut easily with a circular saw.

[0079] Polyurethane structural foam is the most cost-efficient foam matrix currently available. Polyurethane foam can be formulated to be fire, insect and fungal resistant based on additives which have been proven successful. Depending on the selection of extruded structural chemical materials and whether the foam is filled or unfilled significantly changes the structural integrity of the core material. However, PVC materials rather than polyethylene or polypropylene are preferred because of the superior mechanical and thermal properties.

[0080] Structural additives may be utilized for cost savings. Natural fibers as well as chopped glass fibers may be used because PVC is moisture resistant, which protects the natural fibers from degradation. A higher percentage of fibers will result in a higher structural stiffness. 30% to 50% by weight with a ratio of 50% hemp fiber and 50% glass is preferred. Glass fibers are more thermally stable but natural fibers are more cost-efficient. By using the above listed high fiber ratios, increased amounts of blowing agents may be used, which will lower the density of the foam without sacrificing structural integrity. Small amounts of solid particles such as glass microspheres or fumed silica can also be added to tailor the CTE. This tailoring will allow the materials to function homogeneously promoting the best mechanical thermal stability between composite components.

[0081] In the case of foam plastics the same structural enhancement previously mentioned can be used. The introduction of the structural fillers and fibers can be introduced in the thermo plastic material prior to the extrusion from the raw material supplier or in the compounding step before contact with a blowing agent(s) or mechanically injected gas. In the case of mechanically injected gases, the structural fillers and fibers can be incorporated into the plastic through the introduction of the pressurized gas, which contains the appropriate mixture ration of the structural particles and fibers.

[0082] Plastics may also incorporate UV stabilizers. UV stabilizers tend to decreased with time. UV stabilizer may be incorporated into the plastic as an additive throughout the entire thickness of the plastic. In use, UV attack typically comes from sunlight. Therefore, the plastic composite needs a protective UV coating rather than internal UV stability.

[0083] A non-skid surface with excellent abrasion resistance and a UV coating that does not lose UV stability with time would be a benefit to the above described composite system, particularly when employed in a method to create composite wood planks for use in household decking. The non-skid coating may be made by adding fillers such as sand, micro spheres or other small hard particles. These particles will be added to different areas of the manufacturing processes. The first application will apply a dust coating prior to an embossing wheel thereby embedding small particles into the surface of the composite. The excess material may then be vacuumed off the surface and recycled. A spray applied sealant with a UV additive as well as an abrasion resistant particle may then be applied. This coating will have the appearance of a translucent stain giving the embossed wood grain a natural stain look of wood. An embossing tool is deployed to leave grooves similar to wood grain characteristics, which makes the coating thicker and darker in the wood grain pattern to simulate the appearance of real wood. Selecting the appropriate coating system with the appropriate pigment level can help seal the wood particles into the composite as well as even out inconsistent color variations of WPC. The plastic will still need a basic pigment additive so that if the coating were scratched or damage there will not be a drastic color difference. It is also possible to provide a scratch repair system for the consumer to match their aesthetic grain pattern when a scratch is sealed. There are a variety of coatings that can be used. For example, polyurethanes, polyureas, and acrylics with a variety of curing possibilities, such as room temperature, heat and catalyzed.

[0084] The composite industry has developed a variety of materials that can be used to create structural materials having desired properties. It is anticipated that the foam industry may produce foams that have strengths greater than wood itself that can be enhanced by the use of the methods of the invention for reinforcing foam materials. FIG. 9 illustrates that a durable outward shell may be required or the foam may have a durable self-skinning process in which the foam creates its own durable outer shell upon curing.

[0085] Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the appended claims.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 1 Model 1 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 4.813 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 45 Model 1 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 4.813 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 25 Model 1 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 4.813 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 1 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0229 45 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.437 0.00944 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 25 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.437 0.00706 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Area Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] [in2] 2 Model 1 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 4.813 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 14 Model 1 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 4.813 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 26 Model 1 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 4.813 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Cross Core Core Core Yield Core Sectional Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Area Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] [in2] [in] 2 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0123 14 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.437 0.0051 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 26 Bayer Materials 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.437 0.00515 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 Structure Structure Cross Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Sectional Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Area Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] [in2] 3 Model 1 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 15 Model 1 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 27 Model 1 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Cross Core Core Core Core Yield Core Sectional Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Area Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] [in2] [in] 3 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00878 15 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.437 0.00518 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 27 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.437 0.00422 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 4 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 4 Model 1 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 16 Model 1 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 28 Model 1 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 4.813 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 4 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00796 16 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.437 0.00483 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 28 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.437 0.00397 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 5 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 5 Model 2 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 5.178 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 17 Model 2 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 5.178 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 29 Model 2 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 5.178 Duraflex LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) Core Core Core Core Core Yield Core Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 5 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0216 17 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.072 0.01 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 29 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.072 0.00775 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 6 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 6 Model 2 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 5.178 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 18 Model 2 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 5.178 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 30 Model 2 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.0004 5.178 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 6 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0117 18 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.072 0.00666 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 30 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.072 0.00545 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 7 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 7 Model 2 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 5.178 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 19 Model 2 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 5.178 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 31 Model 2 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 5.178 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 7 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00831 19 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.072 0.00521 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 31 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 3.072 0.00438 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 8 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 8 Model 2 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 5.178 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 20 Model 2 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 5.178 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 36 Model 2 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 8 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00753 20 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 3.072 0.00484 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 36 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.00371 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 9 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 9 Model 3 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 3.52 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 21 Model 3 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 3.52 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) 33 Model 3 PolyOne 2.70E+09 0.38 1390 4.36E+07 0.00006 3.52 Duraflec LD800 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC) Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 9 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0287 21 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.00585 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 33 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.00585 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 10 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 10 Model 3 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 3.52 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 22 Model 3 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 3.52 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 34 Model 3 PolyOne 5.01E+09 0.38 1480 5.45E+07 0.00004 3.52 Fiberloc 97510 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 10 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0155 22 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 4.73 0.00618 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 34 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.00458 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 11 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 11 Model 3 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 23 Model 3 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 35 Model 3 PolyOne 7.03E+09 0.38 1550 6.03E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97520 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Cross Core Core Core Core Yield Core Sectional Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Area Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] [in2] [in] 11 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.011 23 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 4.73 0.00509 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 35 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.0039 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 12 Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Cross Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Sectional Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] 12 Model 3 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 24 Model 3 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled 36 Model 3 PolyOne 7.76E+09 0.38 1620 6.26E+07 0.00003 3.52 Fiberloc 97530 Vinyl Compound- Rigid (RPVC), Glass Filled Core Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Core Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 12 none 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00998 24 Bayer Material 8.30E+09 0.35 1590 1.03E+08 0.00003 4.73 0.00479 Science Baydur STR/C-405 IMR, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 45% Glass Filled 36 Bayer Material 1.50E+10 0.35 1710 2.21E+08 0.00001 4.73 0.00371 Science Baydur STR/C-400 BB, Polyurethane Composite SRIM Foam, 60% Glass Filled

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 13 Structure Structure Structure Structure Yield Structure Geometric Pictoral Structure Modulus Poisson Density Strength CTE Case Configuration Image Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] 37 Model 4 North Wood 1.70E+09 0.38 1003 1.70E+07 0.00E+00 Plastics HDPE with 20% Wood Fiber 38 Model 4 North Wood 2.70E+09 0.38 1054 1.80E+07 0.00E+00 Plastics HDPE with 40% Wood Fiber 39 Model 4 North Wood 4.40E+09 0.38 1158 1.60E+07 0.00E+00 Plastics HDPE with 60% Wood Fiber 40 Model 4 North Wood 1.80E+09 0.38 994 1.50E+07 0 Plastics HDPE + UNIFILL 60 (20% Wood Fiber) 41 Model 4 North Wood 3.80E+09 0.38 1071 1.50E+07 0 Plastics HDPE + UNIFILL 60 (40% Wood Fiber) Structure Core Cross Core Core Core Core Yield Cross Maximum Sectional Core Modulus Poisson Density Strength Core CTE Sectional Deflection Case Area [in2] Material [N/m2] Ratio [kg/m3] [N/m2] [/Kdeg] Area [in2] [in] 37 8.25 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0223 38 8.25 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.014 39 8.25 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00861 40 8.25 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0211 41 8.25 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00997