Apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of NOx storage-reduction catalyst

Abstract

An apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of an NOx storage-reduction catalyst for purifying an exhaust gas discharged from an internal engine, including an intake air amount detection unit for detecting an intake air amount to the internal combustion engine, an exhaust gas temperature detection unit for detecting the temperature of an exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, an NOx purification rate detection unit for detecting NOx in an exhaust gas flowing into the NOx storage-reduction catalyst and in an exhaust gas flowing out of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, thereby detecting an NOx purification rate, and a diagnostic unit for, when the temperature of the exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst increases following an increase in the intake air flow rate to the internal combustion engine and in turn, the temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst greatly increases over a first predetermined threshold value, calculating a difference in the NOx purification rate between before and after the rise of temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, and diagnosing the NOx storage-reduction catalyst as being deteriorated when the NOx purification rate difference is larger than a second predetermined threshold value.

Claims

1. An apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of a NOx storage-reduction catalyst for purifying an exhaust gas discharged from an internal engine, comprising: an intake air amount detection unit for detecting an intake air amount to the internal combustion engine, an exhaust gas temperature detection unit for detecting the temperature of an exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, a NOx purification rate detection unit for detecting NOx in an exhaust gas flowing into the NOx storage-reduction catalyst and in an exhaust gas flowing out of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, thereby detecting an NOx purification rate, and a diagnostic unit for, when the temperature of the exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst increases following an increase in the intake air flow rate to the internal combustion engine and in turn, the temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst greatly increases over a first predetermined threshold value, calculating a difference in the NOx purification rate between before and after the rise of temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, and diagnosing the NOx storage-reduction catalyst as being deteriorated when the NOx purification rate difference is larger than a second predetermined threshold value.

2. The deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein: when the temperature of the exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst increases following an increase in the intake air flow rate to the internal combustion engine and the difference of a maximum temperature of the exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst from the temperature at a maximum intake air flow rate to the internal combustion engine exceeds a predetermined threshold value, the diagnostic unit calculates a difference between an NOx purification rate at a maximum intake air flow rate to the internal combustion engine and an NOx purification rate at a maximum temperature of the exhaust gas passing through the NOx storage-reduction catalyst, and diagnoses the NOx storage-reduction catalyst as being deteriorated when the NOx purification rate difference is larger than a predetermined threshold value.

3. The deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the exhaust gas temperature detection unit is an incoming gas temperature sensor disposed on the upstream side of the catalyst.

4. The deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the NOx purification rate detection unit calculates the NOx purification rate based on the following formula:
NOx purification rate=[(NOx concentration in incoming gasNOx concentration in outgoing gas)/NOx concentration in incoming gas]100.

5. The deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first threshold value is 25 C. or more.

6. The deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the second threshold value is 50%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the configuration of an internal combustion engine and an exhaust system thereof, to which the present invention is applied.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the relationship between the catalyst temperature and the intake air amount at the time of acceleration.

(3) FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum intake air amount.

(4) FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum catalyst temperature.

(5) FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the step of diagnosing catalyst deterioration based on the obtained NOx purification rates.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the relationship between the intake air amount difference and the temperature difference of a catalyst measured in Examples.

(7) FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the relationship between the NOx purification rate difference and the temperature difference of a catalyst measured in Examples.

MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

(8) The mode for carrying out the present invention is described below by referring to drawings. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the configuration of an internal combustion engine and an exhaust system thereof, to which the present invention is applied. In the figure, 1 is an internal combustion engine, for example, a lean-burn engine or a diesel engine. An exhaust passage 8 is connected to the internal combustion engine 1, and an exhaust gas from the internal combustion engine 1 flows through the exhaust passage. The exhaust passage 8 is open to the atmosphere at the downstream end, and an NSR catalyst 2 is provided in the middle of the exhaust passage 8.

(9) The NSR catalyst is constituted, for example, by including a support composed of an oxide such as alumina and carrying a catalyst component such as platinum and a NOx storage material on the support. As the NOx storage material, an alkali metal such as potassium and sodium, an alkaline earth metal such as barium and calcium, and a rare earth such as lanthanum and yttrium can be used. The NSR performs an NOx storage/release action of absorbing NOx in an exhaust gas in the form of nitrate when the air-fuel ratio of the inflowing exhaust gas is leaner than the theoretical air-fuel ratio, and releasing the stored NOx when the air-fuel ratio of the inflowing exhaust gas is equal to or richer than the theoretical air-fuel ratio. A catalyst (SCR) 3 having a function of selectively reducing NOx by use of a reducing gas component may be provided downstream of the NSR catalyst.

(10) In addition, an electron control unit (hereinafter, referred to as ECU) 7 is disposed as a control means for controlling the engine as a whole. The ECU 7 is an arithmetic logic circuit composed of CPU, ROM, RAM, etc. and is a unit for controlling the operation state of the internal combustion engine 1 according to the operation conditions of the internal combustion engine 1 or a request from a driver.

(11) Various sensors such as incoming gas temperature sensor 4, NOx sensor 5 and air amount sensor 6 are connected to ECU, and output signals of various sensors are input to the ECU 7.

(12) In such an exhaust system, the NOx storage capacity is reduced due to deterioration of the NSR catalyst 2, and the deterioration of the NSR catalyst 2 reduces the NOx storage capacity from the high-temperature side. Because, the NOx storage material, for example, barium, related to the NOx storage capacity is subject to aggregation due to heat, and sulfur in the fuel adsorbs to coarsened barium to form a strong chemical bond and becomes a sulfate, which is considered to be a main factor.

(13) Incidentally, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the present inventors have found that under operation conditions involving acceleration and deceleration, the catalyst temperature increases one step behind at the time of acceleration. In the deteriorated catalyst, the catalytic performance when the temperature increases is low for the reason above, and therefore, in the present invention, the deterioration diagnosis is performed based on a difference between the purification performance under the low catalyst temperature condition at the time of acceleration and the catalytic performance when the catalyst temperature increases after acceleration. More specifically, since the catalytic performance (NOx purification rate) of the deteriorated catalyst at a maximum catalyst temperature is low compared with a normal catalyst, the difference from the catalytic performance at a maximum intake air amount providing maximum NOx storage capacity increases, and when the difference is not less than a threshold value, the catalyst is diagnosed as being deteriorated. However, in order to ensure the detection accuracy, this is conditioned by the fact that the difference between the catalyst temperature at a maximum catalyst temperature and the catalyst temperature at a maximum intake air amount is not less than the threshold value.

(14) FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum intake air amount, which is executed by ECU 7. FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum catalyst temperature. FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the step of diagnosing catalyst deterioration based on the obtained NOx purification rates.

(15) To describe the step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum intake air amount, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the intake air amount is first confirmed by an air amount sensor 6, and the value at a maximum intake air amount is set at Ga (1). Subsequently, the NOx purification rate (1) at Ga (1) is calculated. The NOx purification rate is determined from the NOx concentrations in incoming gas and outgoing gas measured by an NOx sensor 5 according to the following formula:
NOx purification rate=[(NOx concentration in incoming gasNOx concentration in outgoing gas)/NOx concentration in incoming gas]100

(16) Here, NOx concentration in incoming gasNOx concentration in outgoing gas means the concentration of NOx stored in the NSR catalyst.

(17) Then, the incoming temperature is confirmed by an incoming temperature sensor 4, and the catalyst temperature (catalyst center temperature) is estimated. This catalyst temperature may be detected using a temperature detection unit for directly detecting the NSR catalyst temperature.

(18) Finally, the catalyst temperature at Ga (1) is set at T (1), and the step is ended.

(19) The step of calculating the NOx purification rate at a maximum catalyst temperature is described below. First, as illustrated in FIG. 4, the NOx purification rate (1) at Ga (1) is calculated, the incoming gas temperature is then confirmed by the incoming gas temperature sensor 4, the presence or absence of a temperature drop is examined, the catalyst temperature (catalyst center temperature) is estimated from the incoming gas temperature when a temperature drop is detected, and the temperature here is taken as a maximum value of catalyst temperature and set at T (2). Subsequently, the NOx purification rate (2) at T (2) is calculated in the same manner as 1. Furthermore, the intake air amount at T (2) is set at Ga (2), and the step is ended.

(20) Finally, the step of diagnosing catalyst deterioration is described. As illustrated in FIG. 5, the temperature difference (T) between T (2) as the maximum value of catalyst temperature and T (1) set for the catalyst temperature at Ga (1) is determined, and whether or not the difference is higher than a threshold value is determined. The threshold value is a temperature difference enabling recognition of sufficient catalyst deterioration and is previously determined by experiments and stored in ECU. In FIG. 5, the threshold value is 34 C. When the temperature difference is higher than 34 C., the difference (12) between the NOx purification rate (1) at Ga (1) and the NOx purification rate (2) at T (2) is determined, and when the determined difference is higher than a threshold value (in FIG. 5, 0.5), the catalyst is diagnosed as being deteriorated. This threshold value is also previously determined by experiments and stored in ECU.

(21) According to such a configuration, the intake air amount, catalyst temperature and NOx concentration are measured at the time of transient operation, and the catalyst deterioration can thereby be diagnosed in ECU.

EXAMPLES

(22) Preparation of Catalyst

(23) (Preparation of Slurry for Underlayer Coating)

(24) After mixing a 2 g portion as Pt amount of a dinitrodiammine platinum nitrate solution and a 0.2 g portion as Pd amount of a palladium nitrate solution with 200 g of ion-exchanged water, 65 g of alumina powder was mixed while stirring. The mixture was then heated while stirring and evaporated until dryness, and the obtained powder was fired at 500 C. in an electric furnace for 2 hours to obtain PtPd-Supported Alumina Powder (1).

(25) In addition, 28.1 g of barium acetate was dissolved in 300 g of ion-exchanged water, and 170 g of 5% lanthanum-added cerium oxide was added. The mixture was heated while stirring and evaporated until dryness, and the obtained powder was fired at 500 C. in an electric furnace for 2 hours to obtain Ba-Supported CeO.sub.2 Powder (2).

(26) Slurry A was prepared by suspending 67.2 g of PtPd-Supported Alumina Powder (1) and 191.72 g of Ba-Supported CeO.sub.2 Powder (2), obtained above, in 300 g of ion-exchanged water and adding an alumina binder.

(27) (Preparation of Slurry for Overlayer Coating)

(28) After mixing a 0.6 g portion as Pt amount of a dinitrodiammine platinum nitrate solution and a 0.3 g portion as Pd amount of a palladium nitrate solution with 100 g of ion-exchanged water, 30 g of alumina powder was mixed while stirring. The mixture was then heated while stirring and evaporated until dryness, and the obtained powder was fired at 500 C. in an electric furnace for 2 hours to obtain PtPd-Supported Alumina Powder (3).

(29) In addition, a 0.3 g portion as Rh amount of a rhodium nitrate solution was mixed with 100 g of ion-exchanged water, and 30 g of alumina powder was mixed while stirring. The mixture was heated while stirring and evaporated until dryness, and the obtained powder was fired at 500 C. in an electric furnace for 2 hours to obtain Rh-Supported Alumina Powder (4).

(30) Furthermore, 12.77 g of barium acetate was dissolved in 100 g of ion-exchanged water, and 45 g of 5% lanthanum-added cerium oxide was added. The mixture was heated while stirring and evaporated until dryness, and the obtained powder was fired at 500 C. in an electric furnace for 2 hours to obtain Ba-Supported CeO.sub.2 Powder (5).

(31) Slurry B was prepared by suspending 30.9 g of PtPd-Supported Alumina Powder (3), 30.3 g of Rh-Supported Alumina Powder (4) and 54.87 g of Ba-Supported CeO.sub.2 Powder (5), obtained above, in 300 g of ion-exchanged water and adding an alumina binder.

(32) (Coating of Catalyst)

(33) Using Slurry A, a wash coat was applied to a portion corresponding to 100% of the total length from one end on the upstream side of a cordierite-made honeycomb substrate (1.38 L, 400 cells, 4 mil), dried and fired to form an underlayer coating part. Furthermore, using Slurry B, a wash coat is applied to a portion corresponding to 100% of the total length, dried and fired to form an overlayer coating part.

(34) (Endurance of Catalyst)

(35) Using a 2 L diesel engine, an endurance treatment of catalyst was performed by conducting a repetitive treatment of PM regeneration at a catalyst temperature of 680 C. for 62 hours and a sulfur-poisoning regeneration, and a normal catalyst was thereby obtained. On the other hand, as a catalyst for judging the deterioration of catalyst, a deteriorated catalyst was obtained by, after performing the endurance treatment above, further continuing a 200 hour endurance treatment until the purification performance was reduced.

(36) (Evaluation of Catalyst)

(37) The obtained catalyst was mounted in an exhaust system of a 2 L diesel engine, and a transient state evaluation was performed in an acceleration/deceleration operation pattern described in FTP mode. In order to confirm that the deterioration determination by a sensor is coincident with actual catalytic performance, the concentrations of NOx contained in an exhaust gas on the engine outlet side and in an exhaust gas on the NSR catalyst outlet side were measured using MEXA 9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.

(38) The measurement results of the normal catalyst and the deteriorated catalyst are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.

(39) TABLE-US-00001 Catalyst Catalyst T Intake Air Intake Air ga (intake Temperature Temperature (temperature Amount Amount air amount (storage During During difference: During During difference: efficiency Measurement Measurement T (2) T Measurement Measurement Ga (1) Ga difference) Normal Catalyst of 1 ( C.) of 2 ( C.) (1)) of 1 of 2 (2)) (1 2) Normal Catalyst 258 350 92 55 12 43 15 Example 1 Normal Catalyst 277 345 68 58 22 36 0 Example 2 Normal Catalyst 243 277 34 32 13 19 15 Example 3 Normal Catalyst 248 288 40 25 17 8 35 Example 4 Normal Catalyst 262 280 18 35 16 19 45 Example 5 Normal Catalyst 242 285 43 40 8 32 0 Example 6 Normal Catalyst 175 255 80 52 30 22 30 Example 7 Normal Catalyst 290 388 98 65 22 43 30 Example 8 Normal Catalyst 191 210 19 35 12 23 70 Example 9 Normal Catalyst 126 180 54 35 14 21 40 Example 10 Normal Catalyst 63 100 37 43 9.7 33.3 50 Example 11

(40) TABLE-US-00002 Catalyst Catalyst T Intake Air Intake Air ga (intake Temperature Temperature (temperature Amount Amount air amount (storage During During difference: During During difference: efficiency Measurement Measurement T (2) T Measurement Measurement Ga (1) Ga difference) of 1 ( C.) of 2 ( C.) (1)) of 1 of 2 (2)) (1 2) Deteriorated 270 350 80 53 12 41 95 Catalyst Example 1 Deteriorated 308 380 72 56 22 34 72 Catalyst Example 2 Deteriorated 188 295 107 24 10.3 13.7 95 Catalyst Example 3 Deteriorated 243 298 55 30 11 19 53 Catalyst Example 4 Deteriorated 266 308 42 25 15.5 9.5 75 Catalyst Example 5 Deteriorated 239 305 66 34 9.4 24.6 85 Catalyst Example 6 Deteriorated 245 299 54 38 10 28 70 Catalyst Example 7 Deteriorated 234 280 46 30 17 13 60 Catalyst Example 8 Deteriorated 184 210 26 36 15 21 40 Catalyst Example 9 Deteriorated 240 260 20 53 51 2 60 Catalyst Example 10 Deteriorated 128 178 50 36 32 4 90 Catalyst Example 11 Deteriorated 57 105 48 43 35 8 55 Catalyst Example 12

(41) Furthermore, these results are shown together in FIGS. 6 and 7. As illustrated in FIG. 6, the normal catalyst and the deteriorated catalyst are not different in terms of the relationship between the temperature difference and intake air amount of the catalyst, but as illustrated in FIG. 7, in the deteriorated catalyst, when the difference (T) between the temperature at a maximum catalyst center temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst and the catalyst center temperature of the NOx storage-reduction catalyst at a maximum intake air amount is 34 C. or more, the difference between the NOx purification rate (2) at a maximum catalyst center temperature and the NOx purification rate (1) at a maximum intake air amount was 50% or more.

(42) In this way, according to the catalyst deterioration diagnosis apparatus of Examples, the catalyst deterioration can be diagnosed from the difference between the NOx purification rate (2) at a maximum catalyst center temperature and the NOx purification rate (1) at a maximum intake air amount.

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

(43) 1: Internal combustion engine 2: NSR Catalyst 3: SCR Catalyst 4: Incoming gas temperature sensor 5: NOx Sensor 6: Air amount sensor 7: ECU 8: Exhaust passage