Treatment of Kidney Disease Using Renal Nerve Denervation Via the Renal Pelvis

Abstract

In an illustrative embodiment, systems and methods for treating kidney disease in a human patient are disclosed. A method includes advancing a collapsible array of RF electrodes through a urinary tract of the patient in collapsed form and into a position in or near a renal pelvis. The effector is deployed to an expanded form to engage at least a portion of an interior wall of the renal pelvis. RF energy delivered through the array of electrodes target afferent nerves proximate the interior wall of the renal pelvis to inhibit or destroy their function. eGFR of the patient can be raised after treatment according to the method.

Claims

1. (canceled)

2. A method for reducing blood pressure in a patient diagnosed with hypertension by altering efferent (inbound) renal nerve activity via a procedure that disrupts renal afferent (outbound) nerves, the method comprising: advancing a catheter through a urinary tract of a patient toward a renal pelvis of the patient such that a distal end of the catheter is positioned within the renal pelvis or ureteral pelvic junction adjacent the renal pelvis; providing a plurality of electrodes at the distal end of the catheter, the electrodes in communication with a radio frequency energy source; drawing a vacuum through the catheter to collapse a wall of the renal pelvis such that renal pelvic wall tissue of the renal pelvis is in contact with the plurality of electrodes; and applying radio frequency energy to the plurality of electrodes to disrupt and/or ablate afferent nerves in the renal pelvic wall tissue proximate the respective locations at which the renal pelvic wall tissue contacts each of the plurality of electrodes; wherein applying radio frequency energy disrupts and/or ablates primarily afferent renal nerves contained in the renal pelvic wall tissue; whereby, by disrupting and/or ablating the primarily afferent renal nerves, the patient's efferent nerve activity is altered; and whereby altering the patient's efferent nerve activity causes a reduction in the patient's blood pressure.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the radio frequency energy is applied for 1 to 2 minutes.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the renal pelvic wall tissue containing the afferent renal nerves is heated to a temperature of 45 to 80 degrees Celsius.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein at least a portion of the disrupted and/or ablated afferent renal nerves are located within one or more smooth muscle layers of the renal pelvic wall.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least a portion of the disrupted and/or ablated afferent renal nerves are located within an endothelium region of the renal pelvic wall.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein disrupting and/or ablating afferent renal nerves has a direct effect on efferent renal nerve activity.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein applying radio frequency energy forms lesions in renal pelvic wall tissue by raising the temperature of the one or more electrodes to 60 degrees C. for two minutes.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein the patient's renal pelvis contains urine prior to the application of the vacuum.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein the vacuum is drawn through a lumen of the catheter.

11. The method of claim 2, wherein collapse of walls of the renal pelvis is partial.

12. The method of claim 2, wherein applying radio frequency energy preferentially disrupts and/or ablates nerves disposed closer to an interior surface of the wall of the renal pelvis than to an exterior surface of the wall of the renal pelvis.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments and, together with the description, explain these embodiments. Where applicable, some or all features may not be illustrated to assist in the description of underlying features. In the drawings:

[0032] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a patient's urinary system.

[0033] FIGS. 2A and 2B are partially broken-away illustrations of a patient's kidney showing the renal pelvis and other structures.

[0034] FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the patient's kidney taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 2A.

[0035] FIG. 3A shows the structure and location of renal nerves within the muscle layers, endothelium, and submucosa of the renal pelvis. The afferent nerves originate and are mostly contained within the wall of the renal pelvis. They have a direct effect on the efferent sympathetic nerves and are responsible for sympathetic muscle tone and vasoconstriction.

[0036] FIGS. 4A through 4C illustrate access and treatment of a patient's renal pelvis according to the principles of an embodiment.

[0037] FIGS. 5A through 5F illustrate different effector designs that can be used for treating the renal nerves in accordance with the principles of the embodiments.

[0038] FIGS. 6A-6D illustrate an energy delivery catheter having an expandable cage which is deployed in the renal pelvis adjacent to the ureteral os to deliver energy into the renal pelvis wall.

[0039] FIGS. 7A-7D illustrate an energy delivery catheter having a plurality of tissue-penetrating electrodes which may be advanced into the wall of the renal pelvis adjacent to the ureteral os to deliver energy into the renal pelvis wall.

[0040] FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate an energy delivery catheter comprising a pair of bipolar electrodes and having vacuum ports to collapse the renal pelvis wall about the electrodes when the catheter is present in the renal pelvis adjacent to the ureteral os.

[0041] FIGS. 9A-9D illustrate an energy delivery catheter having a pair of expandable cages which may be deployed in the renal pelvis adjacent to the ureteral os to deliver energy into the renal pelvis wall.

[0042] FIGS. 10A-10D illustrate an energy delivery catheter having a pair of malecots which may be opened to deploy wire electrodes in the renal pelvis adjacent to the ureteral os to deliver energy into the renal pelvis wall.

[0043] FIG. 11 is a consort diagram.

[0044] FIGS. 12A and 12B are bar charts showing the effect of renal pelvic denervation on ambulatory blood pressure reflected by (a) changes 1 and 2 months after ablation (* indicates p<0.001 by t-test, overall effects for changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) through Month 2 by linear mixed model at p<0.001) with (b) persistent 24-hour effects on SBP and DBP from baseline to month 2 (means with standard errors calculated by averaging all blood pressures taken during that hour).

[0045] FIG. 13 is a bar chart showing change from baseline in office blood pressure (p-values for changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at each time point and for overall effects by linear mixed model analysis).

[0046] FIG. 14 shows waterfall plots of 24-hour ABPM (Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring) changes for each subject at Month 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

[0047] The description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended to be a description of various, illustrative embodiments of the disclosed subject matter. Specific features and functionalities are described in connection with each illustrative embodiment; however, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed embodiments may be practiced without each of those specific features and functionalities.

[0048] It is noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms a, an, and the include plural referents unless the context expressly dictates otherwise. That is, unless expressly specified otherwise, as used herein the words a, an, the, and the like carry the meaning of one or more. Additionally, it is to be understood that terms such as left, right, top, bottom, front, rear, side, height, length, width, upper, lower, interior, exterior, inner, outer, and the like that may be used herein merely describe points of reference and do not necessarily limit embodiments of the present disclosure to any particular orientation or configuration. Furthermore, terms such as first, second, third, etc., merely identify one of a number of portions, components, steps, operations, functions, and/or points of reference as disclosed herein, and likewise do not necessarily limit embodiments of the present disclosure to any particular configuration or orientation.

[0049] Furthermore, the terms approximately, about, proximate, minor variation, and similar terms generally refer to ranges that include the identified value within a margin of 20%, 10% or preferably 5% in certain embodiments, and any values therebetween.

[0050] A patient's urinary tract is diagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 1. The urinary tract includes the bladder B, which receives urine from the right and left kidneys RK and LK and drains the urine through the urethra UTHR. The kidneys each receive oxygenated blood through the renal artery RA from the abdominal aorta AA and blood from the kidneys is returned through the renal vein RV to the inferior vena cava IVC. Of particular interest to the present disclosure, the urine which is processed in the kidney is received in an interior cavity of each kidney referred to as the renal pelvis RP which acts as a funnel and delivers the urine into the top of the ureter URTR. Methods and protocols described herein will be performed within the interior of the renal pelvis RP in order to treat the renal nerves within the walls of the renal pelvis as well as the nerves surrounding the renal arteries within the adventitia and adipose tissue and to a lesser extent surrounding the renal veins which branch from the main renal artery and renal vein within the tissue of the kidney.

[0051] Referring now to FIGS. 2A and 2B, the right kidney RK is shown in section to expose the renal pelvis RP and other internal structures of the kidney. As shown in FIG. 2A, the renal pelvis is a funnel-shaped extension of the upper end of the ureter URTR and is surrounded by the branching portions of the renal artery RA and the renal vein RV, both of which branching structures extend into the body of the kidney and surround the pyramids P and other structures, including the papillae PP. The branching structures of the renal artery RA and renal vein RV as well as the anterior wall of the renal pelvis are removed in FIG. 2B to show the interior of the renal pelvis which is the target location for the therapies of several embodiments.

[0052] As further shown in FIG. 3 which is a cross-sectional view taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 2A, the renal nerves RN surround the renal blood vessels, particularly the renal arteries RA, extending adjacent to and surrounding the outer wall of the renal pelvis RP in a tissue bed surrounding the renal pelvis. As shown in FIG. 3A, the renal nerves follow the arteries and then divide. A portion of the divided nerves enter the renal pelvic wall RPW where they intertwine with the afferent nerves AFN that are located within the smooth muscle layers, endothelium and submucosa SML of the renal pelvis. The afferent nerves AFN originate and are mostly contained within an interior wall of the renal pelvis adjacent to the urothelium URT. The afferent nerves have a direct effect on the efferent sympathetic nerves EFN (which are generally located nearer the exterior surface of the renal pelvis wall RPW than are the afferent sensory nerves AFN) and are responsible for sympathetic muscle tone and vasoconstriction. It is the renal nerves shown in FIGS. 3 and 3A, and in particular the sensory afferent nerves AFN, which are typically but not exclusively the target structures to be treated by the methods and apparatus of several embodiments.

[0053] Referring now to FIGS. 4A through 4C, a first exemplary protocol for accessing and treating the renal nerves in the kidney will be described. Initially, a guide or other tubular catheter 10 is advanced through the urethra UTHR to position a distal port 12 adjacent the os OS at the lower end of the ureter URTR.

[0054] As shown in FIG. 4B, a treatment catheter 14 is then advanced through the guide catheter 1 (optionally over a guidewire), out of port 12, and into a lumen of the ureter URTR. An effector 16 at the distal end of the treatment catheter 14 is advanced into the renal pelvis RP, optionally under fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound guidance in a conventional manner.

[0055] Once in the renal pelvis RP, the effector 16 will be deployed in order to treat the renal nerves in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure. For example, the effector may comprise an expandable structure which is mechanically expanded or inflated within the renal pelvis to engage the interior walls of the pelvis as shown in FIG. 4C. Any one of a variety of energy exchange devices or substance delivery devices may then be employed to exchange energy or deliver the substances through the wall of the renal pelvis to treat the nerves embedded within the walls of the renal pelvis as well as the nerves embedded in the tissue surrounding the renal pelvis.

[0056] As shown in FIG. 5A, for example, the inflated or expanded effector 16 can be used to deliver convective heat through the wall of the renal pelvis, for example by delivering an externally heated fluid into the interior of the effector and removing the fluid from the interior to recirculate the hot fluid. As shown in FIG. 5B, it would also be possible to use an electrical resistance or other heater 18 which is positioned within the effector 16 in order to heat a fluid in situ where the fluid would not necessarily be recirculated. Typically, continuous irrigation will be provided through the catheter to cool the electrodes which in turn reduces damage to the adjacent tissue in contact with the electrode.

[0057] As shown in FIG. 5C, energy can be delivered in other ways, such as using a microwave antenna 20 which is positioned by the effector 16 to deliver microwave energy through the wall and into the nerves within the renal pelvis. Both the dimensions and geometry of the effector 16 as well as the transmission characteristics of the antenna 20 can be configured in order to selectively deliver the microwave energy into the tissue to achieve the targeted heating.

[0058] Still another alternative energy delivery mechanism is illustrated in FIG. 5D where bipolar electrodes 22a and 22b are arranged on the exterior of the effector 16 surface and connectible to an external radiofrequency generator 24 to deliver bipolar radiofrequency energy to the tissue. Again, the dimensions of the electrodes, spacing, and other system features can be selected to deliver energy to a proper depth in the wall of the renal pelvis as well as to the tissue beds surrounding the renal pelvis.

[0059] As shown in FIG. 5E, a single monopolar electrode 30 may be provided on the exterior of the effector 16 where one pole 32 of the RF generator 24 connected to the electrode on the effector and the other pole 34 connected to an external pad 36 which will be placed on the patient's skin, typically on the lower back.

[0060] Still further, effector 16 construction shown in FIG. 5F includes an ultrasound phased array 40 positioned within the interior of the effector and connected to an external ultrasound generator 42. The ultrasound phased array 40 will typically be constructed to provide high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in order to selectively deliver energy across the wall of the renal pelvis and into the tissue beds surrounding the pelvis in order to heat the tissue and treat the renal nerves in accordance with the principles of an embodiment.

[0061] Referring now to FIGS. 6A-6D, an expandable catheter cage 50 comprises an expandable cage structure 52 including a plurality of electrode elements 54. The electrode elements will typically be formed from a shape memory alloy, such as nitinol, and will usually be electrically conductive along their entire lengths. A proximal portion of each electrode, however, will usually be covered with a layer of insulation 55 in order to inhibit energy delivery to the upper region of the ureter URTR through which the catheter is introduced. The catheter 50 further includes an inner shaft 58 and an outer sheath 60, where the outer sheath may be distally advanced over the expandable cage structure 52 in order to collapse the cage structure for delivery, as shown in FIG. 6A. By retracting the sheath 60 relative to the inner shaft 58, the cage 52 may be deployed as shown in FIG. 6B. After the catheter 50 is introduced through the ureter URTR, as shown in FIG. 6C, the sheath may be retracted in order to deploy the cage structure 52 within the renal pelvis RP adjacent to the ureteral os OS. The portions of the electrode elements 54 adjacent to the os will be insulated so that energy is preferentially delivered a short distance above the os in order to avoid damage to the ureter and other sensitive structures. The energy delivered through the electrode elements 54 will pass through the wall RPW of the renal pelvis in order to treat the renal nerves (RN), as shown in FIG. 6D. A radiopaque marker 62 can be provided at or near the distal end of the sheath 60 to assist in positioning the catheter 50 at or above the os under fluoroscopic imaging.

[0062] Referring now to FIGS. 7A-7D, a penetrating electrode catheter 70 includes a plurality of tissue-penetrating electrodes 72 deployed from an inner shaft 74 and having an outer sheath 76 reciprocally mounted thereover. The outer sheath 76 has a radiopaque marker 78 at its distal end (for positioning in the ureter URTR) and may be selectively retracted from a distal tip 80 of the inner shaft 74 in order to deploy the tissue-penetrating electrodes 72, as shown in FIG. 7B. Usually, the catheter 70 will have a port 82 opening to an inner lumen (not shown) to allow advancement over a guidewire GW, as shown in FIGS. 7A and 7C.

[0063] After the marker 78 of the catheter 70 is positioned at or just above the ureteral os OS, as shown in FIG. 7C, the inner shaft 74 may be advanced to deploy the electrodes 72 into the wall RPW of the renal pelvis RP. RF energy is then delivered from the power supply 84 in order to treat the renal nerves RN which surround the renal pelvis wall RPW as shown in FIG. 7D.

[0064] Referring to FIGS. 8A-8C, a bipolar electrode 90 having a pair of axially spaced-apart electrodes 94 comprises a catheter shaft 92 having a plurality of vacuum ports 96 disposed between the electrodes. The vacuum ports 96 communicate with an inner lumen (not illustrated) which allows a vacuum to be drawn through the ports in order to partially collapse the renal pelvis, as shown in FIGS. 8B and 8C. After the catheter 50 is advanced to a location where the proximal-most electrode 94 is advanced past the ureteral os OS, as shown in broken line in FIG. 8B, a vacuum may be drawn in the lower portion of the renal pelvis RP to collapse the walls, as shown in full line in both FIGS. 8B and 8C. An external power supply/controller 98 may include both a vacuum source and a radio frequency power source for connection to the catheter 90. After the wall of the renal pelvis is collapsed, radiofrequency energy will be delivered through the electrodes 94 from the power supply 98 in order to treat the renal nerves RN.

[0065] Further referring to FIGS. 9A-9D, a multiple cage catheter 100 has a plurality of individual cages 102 (with two cages illustrated) mounted on an inner shaft 104. The inner shaft terminates at a distal tip 106 having a port 107 which can receive a guidewire GW (FIG. 9A) through a central guidewire lumen (not illustrated). The cages 102 are self-expanding, typically being formed from nitinol or other electrically conductive shape memory material, and will be collapsed by an outer sheath 108 which may be advanced over the cages, as shown in broken line in FIG. 9A, or be retracted to allow the cages to expand as shown in full line in FIG. 9B. The catheter 100 may be advanced through the ureter URTR, as shown in FIG. 9C, where the sheath 108 is then retracted to allow the electrode cages 102 to expand and engage the wall of the renal pelvis RP, as shown in FIG. 9D. Each cage 102 will have a plurality of active electrode regions 110 which are usually formed by covering the non-active regions of the cage (i.e., everything except the active regions at the centers) with an insulating layer or material. After the cages 102 are deployed in contact with the inner surface of the renal pelvis wall RPW, radiofrequency energy may be delivered through power supply 112.

[0066] Referring now to FIGS. 10A-10D, a wire electrode catheter 120 comprises a catheter shaft 122 having a distal end 124. A first set of four axial slits 126a are circumferentially spaced-apart about the tubular wall of the catheter shaft 122, and a second set of four axial slits 126b are also circumferentially spaced apart about the catheter shaft at a region just proximal to the first set. Only four of the two slits 126a and two of the four slits 126b are visible with the remaining two of each set being hidden on the far side of the catheter shaft 122. By axially tensioning the catheter shaft 122, for example by pulling on a cable 127 which is attached at the distal end 124 of the shaft 122, the shaft may be foreshortened causing the sections between adjacent slits to project outwardly to form malecot structures 128, as best seen in FIG. 10B. Electrode wires 130 extend between the axially aligned sections of the first and second malecots so that the wires are advanced radially outwardly when the malecots are deployed by foreshortening the catheter shaft 122. The wires 132 are continuous and extend into an inner lumen of the shaft and exit the shaft at a proximal end thereof and are connected to a power supply 134.

[0067] In order to confirm proper deployment of the electrode wires 130, radiopaque markers 136 are formed distally to, between, and proximally to the slit-malecot structures 128, so that the markers will appear to move together under fluoroscopic observation as the malecots are deployed by pulling on cable 127.

[0068] As shown in FIG. 10C, the deployable structure of the catheter 120 is positioned just beyond the ureteral os OS to deploy the malecot structures 128 radially outwardly as shown best in FIG. 10D. The wires 130 between the malecots 128 will engage the walls of renal pelvis RP above the os OS, and energy may be applied from a power supply 134. Optionally thermocouples 132 will be formed at the radially outward tips of each malecot 128 such that they can penetrate the wall of the renal pelvis in order to monitor temperature during treatment. As before, energy will be delivered in order to inhibit or modulate the function of the renal nerves RN surrounding the renal pelvis wall RPW, as shown in FIG. 10D

EXPERIMENTAL

[0069] Background Endovascular renal denervation is known to produce useful blood pressure (BP) reductions. The data below demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of renal denervation by delivery of radiofrequency energy across the renal pelvis utilizing the natural orifice of the urethra and the ureters. This open-label, single-arm feasibility study enrolled patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite antihypertensive drug therapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the change in ambulatory daytime systolic BP (SBP) 2 months following renal pelvic denervation.

[0070] Surprisingly, the data further demonstrated a small but significant increase in eGFR and a significant decrease in mean serum creatinine, both of which correlate with a decreased risk of kidney disease and associated morbidities, including a reduced risk of stroke, congestive heart failure, and end-stage renal disease, as well as improved hormone function, including reductions in renin, aldosterone, and angiotensin.

Methods

[0071] Participants. Adults between the ages of 18 and 70 with uncontrolled hypertension were eligible for the study at either of two study sites. While continuing to take their background antihypertensive therapy of up to three antihypertensive medications, mean daytime systolic blood pressure measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was required to be at least 135 mm Hg and less than 170 mmHg, with mean daytime diastolic blood pressure less than 105 mm Hg. For those not receiving medications, mean daytime systolic blood pressure was required to be at least 140 mm Hg and less than 170, with mean daytime diastolic blood pressure less than 105 mm Hg. However, while the protocol allowed for participation of both on-med and off-med patients, a decision was made early during the patient enrollment period to recruit only those patients receiving antihypertensive medications. This study report is based on the 18 patients on antihypertensive drug therapy.

[0072] Exclusion criteria included an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) under 45 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 (calculated via the CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation, National Kidney Foundation), type I diabetes, clinically significant structural heart disease and secondary hypertension. The study (NCT05440513) was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before study enrollment.

[0073] Study Procedures. Baseline evaluation included measurement of automated office blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring along with laboratory assessment of serum and urine parameters according to a standard routine. Following collection of blood and urine specimens, patients were seated and allowed to rest for 5 minutes prior to use of an automated blood pressure measurement device (HEM-907XL, Omron Healthcare, Bannockburn, IL) which recorded blood pressure in each arm. Office blood pressure measurement was recorded in triplicate with one-minute separations between measurements. The arm with higher blood pressure at the baseline assessment was used for all subsequent measures. Study personnel would then witness the antihypertensive medication self-administration before positioning the arm cuff for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABP OnTrak 90227, Spacelabs Healthcare, Snoqualmie, WA) on the same arm as used for office blood pressure measurements. Blood pressure was measured every 20 minutes during the day (0600-2159 h) and every 30 minutes at night (2200-0559 h). Patients would return the following day, at a time to assure at least 24 hours of blood pressure recording time, for the device to be removed. Additional baseline assessments included a pregnancy test where relevant, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, computed tomographic (CT) urography and renal ultrasound.

[0074] For those patients meeting entry criteria, renal pelvic denervation was performed via the use of the Verve Medical Phoenix? system. (Verve Medical, Paradise Valley, AZ). This system includes an RF generator and monopolar ablation device with 4 spherical electrodes. A dispersive electrical grounding pad was used (Universal Electrosurgical Pad with Cord, REF 9135-LP, 3M, Saint Paul, MN). The ablation device is placed into the renal pelvis following insertion of a 0.035-0.038 soft tip guidewire into the bladder under visual guidance via rigid cystoscope, which is then advanced under fluoroscopy past the ureteropelvic junction. A sheath (Destina? Twist, Oscor, Inc., Palm Harbor, FL) is passed over that wire to allow for placement of the Phoenix? ablation device into the pelvis, beyond the ureteropelvic junction. The generator delivers up to 30 watts of power via this ablation device, which has 4 spherical conductors on a nitinol helix designed to expand into the renal pelvis and abut the uroepithelial lining. When activated, energy is delivered to increase the temperature to 60? C. within 20 seconds and maintain 60? C. for 2 minutes. Energy is delivered for a single cycle, then repeated in the other kidney. At the completion of the ablation, physicians were permitted to place ureteral stents at their discretion, which, when deployed, remained in place until the day 14 visit.

[0075] Unless clinically necessary, physicians and subjects were encouraged not to terminate or add antihypertensive medications following renal pelvic denervation until completing the Month 2 assessments, with addition of medicines permitted thereafter if office blood pressure continued to be uncontrolled. Post-treatment assessments were scheduled for Day 1, Day 14 and Month 1 with primary endpoints of safety and effectiveness performed at Month 2. At each visit, subjects underwent clinical evaluation including pain assessment and office blood pressure measurement.

[0076] At Day 14, Month 1 and Month 2, specimens were obtained for blood and urine testing. At Month 1 and 2, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed. At Month 1, renal ultrasound and CT urography were repeated. Concomitant medications were recorded, and adverse events were elicited at every visit.

[0077] Safety events of interest were defined in the protocol as: cardiovascular (including acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute kidney injury, or death), device and procedure-related adverse events, urologic events (i.e., infections, hematuria, pain, urinary incontinency and/or obstruction within 14 days of the procedure) and clinically significant changes in serum and urine biochemistry.

Statistical Analysis.

[0078] The objectives of the study were to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Verve Medical Phoenix? system. Safety was assessed through laboratory, urologic imaging and clinical events, included adverse events, serious adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events.

[0079] The primary effectiveness endpoint was the mean change in daytime systolic blood pressure measured by ABPM from baseline to 2 months. Additional endpoints included changes in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office blood pressure.

[0080] Summary single timepoint measurements and baseline characteristics are expressed as mean?SD (standard deviation) or percentages (%). Changes in continuous variables from baseline are shown as mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI). P values for individual time points are based on paired t-tests with changes through the assessment at Month 2, the primary endpoint, are based of mixed models (i.e., random effects models) using the Satterthwaite approximation for degrees of freedom for the overall p-value (F-statistic) and confidence intervals (t-statistic). Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.1.3 (R Core Team 2022). A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Subgroup analyses considered a p<0.10 as significant. DH had full access to all data from the clinical trial and was responsible for the integrity of the data used in the analysis.

Results

[0081] Eighteen patients (mean age 56?12 years) were enrolled on average antihypertensive drug intake of 2.7 daily. Renal pelvic denervation reduced mean daytime SBP by 19.4 mmHg (95% CI: ?24.9, ?14.0, p<0.001) from its baseline of 148.4?8.7 mm Hg. Mean nighttime (?21.4 mmHg, 95% CI: ?29.5, ?13.3) and 24-hour (?20.3 mmHg, 95% CI: ?26.2, ?14.5) SBP fell significantly (p<0.001) as did the corresponding diastolic BP (DBP) (p<0.001). Office SBP decreased from 156.5?12.3 mmHg by 8.3 mmHg (95% CI: ?13.2, ?3.5, p=0.002) within 24 hours post-procedure and by 22.4 mmHg (95% CI: ?31.5, ?13.3, p<0.001) by 2 months. Office DBP was reduced (p=0.001) by 2 months. Mild transitory back pain followed the procedure, but there were no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine decreased by 0.08 mg/dL (p=0.02) and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased by 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 (p=0.03) 2 months following ablation procedure.

[0082] Baseline. Of 41 patients who signed informed consents, 21 were excluded (FIG. 11) including ten who were disqualified for failing to meet the study's blood pressure entry criteria, two due to COVID-19 infection, one identified with ureteral stenosis on baseline imaging, and one with ureteral orifice too narrow to allow for the sheath to be advanced, in whom the option of pre-stenting to enable performance of renal pelvic denervation 1-2 weeks later in this latter case was not employed.

[0083] The study population included 18 patients receiving antihypertensive medicines (Table 1) and two not receiving blood pressure lowering drugs, with the focus of this report on those patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. Average age was 56?12 years, the cohort included 7 women and 11 men who, on average, were treated with 2.7 antihypertensive drugs (Table 1).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Select baseline characteristics of on-med subjects (n {%}, mean (SD)) Characteristic n = 18 Age 56 (12) Female subjects 7 (39%} Body mass index (m/kg.sup.2) 31.6 (4.5) Diabetes mellitus 3 (17%) Myocardial infarction 2 (11%) Coronary artery disease 3 (17%) estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 80 (18) (ml/min/1.73 m.sup.2) Number of hypertension drugs 2.7 (0.5) Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor 16 (89%,) Angiotensin receptor blocker 1 (5.6%) Calcium channel blocker 14 (78%) Beta-blocker 7 (39%) Diuretic 10 (56%) Oral diabetic 3 (17%) Statin 10 (56%)

[0084] Procedural Safety. No serious intra-procedural adverse events were observed. Following renal pelvic denervation, bilateral double-J ureteral stents were placed at investigators' discretion in 9 of 18 patients, which were removed in the office at the 14-day follow-up without complication.

[0085] Adverse Events. There were no serious adverse events and no treatment-emergent adverse events. In those subjects without stent placement, 5/9 reported back/flank pain, while 7/9 who had stents placed reported some pain or discomfort. By day 14, none of the nine patients without stents had pain while 3 patients with stents in place reported mild back or flank pain that persisted following hospital discharge but which resolved prior to or one day following removal of the stents (with average pain score of 3 out of 10 at day 14). In one subject, a renal stone 2.5-3 mm was evident one month after treatment, in whom the baseline study showed evidence of microliths and calcifications, indicating stone formation prior to treatment. The site reported that there was no stone evident on ultrasound imaging at month 6 or month 12. The one subject with proteinuria on a scheduled urinalysis had repeat study 4 days later with no evidence of proteinuria. There were no interventions or concomitant therapies for either of these two patients, and both were categorized as mild and resolved. Nonetheless, the investigator listed these as adverse events. One patient's hemoglobin level dropped from 11.6 g/dL at baseline to 9.8 g/dL at month 1 with initiation of iron anemia at month 6 follow-up. No adverse events are ongoing (Table 2).

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Safety and tolerability of renal pelvic denervation. Event n (%) Post-procedure back/flank pain* 12 (67%) Persistent back/flank pain 0 (0%) Urinary tract infection 2 (11%) Cystitis 0 (0%) Proteinuria 1 (6%) Anemia 1 (6%) Renal stone 1 (6%) Perforation 0 (0%) Hypertensive crisis 0 (0%) Acute kidney injury 0 (0%) Renal failure 0 (0%) Acute coronary syndrome 0 (0%) Stroke 0 (0%) Hospitalization 0 (0%) Death 0 (0%) Treatment-emergent adverse event 0 (0%) Serious adverse event 0 (0%) *Post procedure back/flank pain was evident by day 14 only in 3 subjectseach of whom had stents in placewith average score of 3 out of 10, with pain resolved within 1 day of stent removal. Both urinary tract infections responded to treatment with oral antibiotics.

[0086] Effect on Blood Pressure. The primary effectiveness endpoint of daytime systolic blood pressure at 2 months post-procedure was significantly reduced by 19.4 mm Hg (95% CI: ?24.9, ?14.0, p<0.001). There were also significant reductions in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure by 20.3 mm Hg (95% CI: ?26.2, ?14.5, p<0.001) and nighttime systolic blood pressure by 21.4 mm Hg (95% CI: ?29.5, ?13.3, p<0.001). The corresponding changes for diastolic blood pressure were 9.7 mm Hg daytime (95% CI: ?12.7, ?6.8), ?9.2 mm Hg nighttime (95% CI: ?13.3, ?5.0), and 9.6 mm Hg over 24 hours (95% CI: ?12.5, ?6.6). All these diastolic blood pressure changes were significant (p<0.001). (FIG. 12A) The changes in ambulatory blood pressure over 2 months following renal pelvic denervation are evident over 24 hours, including an effect during the morning blood pressure surge. (FIG. 12B)

[0087] Office systolic blood pressure was reduced by 22.4 mm Hg (95% CI: ?31.0, ?13.8, p<0.001) 2 months post-procedure (FIG. 13). Office blood pressure measurements showed significant reductions at each assessment following renal pelvic denervation as early as one day post-procedure (FIG. 14). The decreases in office systolic blood pressure (p=0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.023) at day one post renal pelvic denervation were statistically significant by t-test but not by mixed model analysis (p=0.057 and p=0.083 for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, respectively). By linear trend test from the time of the procedure to the 2-month endpoint, the progressive decrease in systolic blood pressure over time was statistically significant (p=0.001), whereas the decrease in diastolic blood pressure over time was not (v0.07).

[0088] By 2 months post procedure, mean daytime systolic blood pressure fell in 17 of 18 (94%) subjects and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure fell in all 18 patients (FIG. 14). Mean daytime systolic blood pressure dropped by at least 5 mm Hg in 17 (94%) out of 18 subjects and in 16 (89%) out of 18 patients for 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Mean systolic blood pressure dropped at least 10 mm Hg in 16 (89%) of 18 patients during daytime systolic blood pressure and in 15 (83%) of 18 patients over mean 24 hours systolic blood pressure, and by at least 15 mm Hg in 12 (67%) of 18 patients during daytime systolic blood pressure and in 15 (83%) of 18 patients over mean 24 hours systolic blood pressure. No subjects experienced an increase in mean daytime or 24-hour systolic blood pressure at month 2 post renal pelvic denervation.

[0089] Office heart rate on the first day increased compared to baseline following renal pelvic denervation (p=0.03) but was lower at months 1 and 2 (p<0.07). Overall treatment effects of renal pelvic denervation resulted in a significant reduction in office heart rate (p<0.001) but no significant changes in heart rate were observed in mean daytime, nighttime or 24-hours levels.

[0090] Exploratory analysis of the response in subjects with (n=8) compared to those without (n=10) isolated systolic hypertension did not suggest differences between these groups in any measure of change in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate (p=0.08 by Hotelling's T-statistic). Univariate analyses suggested smaller reduction in daytime and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure for subjects with isolated systolic hypertension. Two months following ablation in these subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, 24-hour systolic blood pressure dropped by 16.8 mm Hg (95% CI: ?25.8 to ?7.7, p=0.003 by t-test) and diastolic blood pressure dropped by 6.1 mm Hg (95% CI: ?9.6 to ?2.6, p=0.004 by t-test).

[0091] Effects on Laboratory Assessments. There was a small but significant increase in eGFR (6.3 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 at month 1 and 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2 at month 2. p=0.033 by mixed model) and a significant decrease in mean serum creatinine (0.08 mg/dL both at months 1 and 2, p=0.023 by mixed model). Hemoglobin dropped by 0.5 g/dL by day 14, by 0.8 g/dL at month 1 and by 0.7 g/dL at month 2 (p=0.001 by mixed model). Hematocrit dropped by 2.4% (p=0.007 by mixed model) by month 2. No significant changes were noted in sodium and potassium levels.

[0092] Chronic kidney disease is typically classified by stages from stage 1 to stage 5. Generally, with all numbers expressed in units of mL/min/1.73 m.sup.2, stage 1 is indicated by a GFR of 90 or above, stage 2 covers GFR in a range between 60 and 89, stage 3 covers GFR in a range between 30 and 59, stage 4 covers GFR in a range between 15 and 29, and stage 5 is classified as having a GFR below 15. Although patients at all stages can benefit from treatment as described herein, treatment is particularly beneficial for patients at stages 3-5.

[0093] It is believed that, other than eGFR/GFR, there are other markers typically associated with kidney disease that can be used to select subjects for treatment according to embodiments herein, and that will respond positively to treatment. For instance, one indicator associated with kidney damage is the presence of albumin in a urine sample. This indicator may show that kidney issues exist even when eGFR is in a normal, stage 1, or stage 2 range. In a normally functioning kidney, little to no protein/albumin is passed from the blood to the urine by the glomerular capsules in the kidney. In a damaged kidney and/or due to high blood pressure, the glomerular capsules may to some extent be unable to prevent the passage of protein/albumin from the blood to the urine. This condition is known as albuminuria or proteinuria. It is a symptom associated with many different types of kidney disease and can be a significant risk factor for complications.

[0094] In an embodiment, one or more methods for measuring albumin is performed on a candidate. One known method is a dipstick method, where the candidate's urine is reacted with a stick that changes color to indicate protein levels in the urine. Another method collects a candidate's 24-hour production of urine and measures the amount of protein excreted in the urine over that timeframe. A normal range of albumin in the urine by this measure is <150 mg/day. Proteinuria is generally indicated when albumin levels exceed 500 mg/day, and levels that exceed 3.5 g/day are indicative of nephrotic syndrome. Where creatinine is also measured, another marker can be developed using the ratio of albumin to creatinine in a sample.

[0095] In an embodiment, efficacy of treatment can be measured by taking a baseline proteinuria reading, which may be used alone or in combination with other metabolic indicators to screen candidates in or out for treatment. At one or more timeframes after treatment (e.g., two weeks, one month, two months, six months, or twelve months), a second proteinuria reading is taken and compared to the baseline reading. A decrease in albumin measure should be expected when a patient responds positively to treatment.

[0096] All of the functionalities described in connection with one embodiment are intended to be applicable to other embodiments except where expressly stated to the contrary or where the feature or function is incompatible with the additional embodiments. For example, where a given feature or function is expressly described in connection with one embodiment but not expressly mentioned in connection with an alternative embodiment, it should be understood that the inventors intend that that feature or function may be deployed, utilized or implemented in connection with the alternative embodiment unless the feature or function is incompatible with the alternative embodiment.

[0097] While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosures. Indeed, the novel methods, apparatuses and systems described herein can be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods, apparatuses and systems described herein can be made without departing from the spirit of the present disclosures. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the present disclosures.