Instrumented Glove for Monitoring Oral Motor Kinetics During Non-Nutritive Feeding
20190216385 ยท 2019-07-18
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61J2200/70
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G16H20/00
PHYSICS
A61B5/1107
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/08
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/6887
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/72
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/0002
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/0205
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/4552
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B2560/0475
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B5/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/22
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01F1/36
PHYSICS
A61B5/145
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/0205
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/03
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/11
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present invention relates to a system device and method for monitoring infant oral motor kinetics (OMK), which can be used to assess the functional significance of the different sucking components, i.e., the plasticity of infant sucking skills in relation to their oral feeding performance, at a particular time, during the developmental period and/or during preventive or therapeutic intervention programs. It is a unique system and apparatus that provides a means to study the nonnutritive and/or nutritive sucking skills, i.e., the Suction and/or Expression components of sucking, of infants in the natural setting, i.e., during a normal feeding session. OMK sensors, tracked in real-time by the monitoring system, include miniature pressure transducers, or pressure sensitive pads, attached to the nipple for measuring intraoral pressure pulses during Suction, and for measuring compression/stripping pressure pulses during Expression; and a miniature flow sensor for measuring fluid flow rate, which can be integrated over time to determine the volume of milk removed (bolus) per suck. Other signals, such as respiration, swallowing, thermal, optical, and acoustic signals can be recorded and compared along with the instrumented-nipple signals, in an OMK monitoring system.
Claims
1. An instrumented glove for monitoring oral motor kinetics of a person who is sucking, comprising: a pressure sensitive pad attached to a finger of a glove; wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises an array of one or more pressure sensitive elements capable of providing a plurality of real-time electrical signals representing a temporal-spatial distribution of pressure forces applied to the finger by the person during sucking, when a portion of the glove's finger is placed in the person's mouth.
2. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the array of one or more pressure sensitive elements comprises a 1-dimensional array of elements; and wherein a longitudinal direction of the 1-dimensional array is aligned parallel to a longitudinal axis of the glove's finger.
3. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the array of one or more pressure sensitive elements comprises a 2-dimensional array of elements.
4. The instrumented glove of claim 3, wherein a longitudinal direction of the 2-dimensional array is aligned parallel to a longitudinal axis of the glove's finger.
5. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad is attached to an exterior surface of the glove's finger.
6. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad is attached to an interior surface of the glove's finger.
7. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical capacitance.
8. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical resistance.
9. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that generate electrical signals by using a piezoelectric effect.
10. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure sensitive pad is glued to the glove's finger using a cyanoacrylate-based adhesive.
11. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the one or more pressure sensitive elements are disposed on a flexible substrate that is attached to the glove's finger.
12. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the one or more pressure sensitive elements comprise one or more pressure sensitive Micro-Electrical-Mechanical-Systems (MEMS) elements.
13. The instrumented glove of claim 1, wherein the pressure pad is covered with a protective coating that covers both an exterior of the pressure pad and a portion of an exterior surface of the glove's finger located adjacent to the pad.
14. The instrumented glove of claim 13, wherein the protective coating comprises silicone.
15. The instrumented glove of claim 6, further comprising at least one through-hole disposed through the glove's finger, wherein the hole is located over a pressure sensitive element.
16. An instrumented glove for monitoring oral motor kinetics of a person who is sucking, comprising: a pressure sensitive pad attached to a finger of a glove; wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises an array of one or more pressure sensitive elements capable of providing a plurality of real-time electrical signals representing a temporal-spatial distribution of pressure forces applied to the finger by the person during sucking, when a portion of the glove's finger is placed in the person's mouth; wherein the one or more pressure sensitive elements are disposed on a flexible substrate that is attached to the glove's finger.
17. The instrumented glove of claim 16, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical capacitance.
18. The instrumented glove of claim 16, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical resistance.
19. The instrumented glove of claim 16, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that generate electrical signals by using a piezoelectric effect.
20. An instrumented glove for monitoring oral motor kinetics of a person who is sucking, comprising: a pressure sensitive pad attached to a finger of a glove; wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises an array of one or more pressure sensitive elements capable of providing a plurality of real-time electrical signals representing a temporal-spatial distribution of pressure forces applied to the finger by the person during sucking, when a portion of the glove's finger is placed in the person's mouth; wherein the one or more pressure sensitive elements are disposed on a rigid substrate that is attached to the glove's finger.
21. The instrumented glove of claim 20, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical capacitance.
22. The instrumented glove of claim 20, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that sense changes in electrical resistance.
23. The instrumented glove of claim 20, wherein the pressure sensitive pad comprises one or more active pressure sensing elements that generate electrical signals by using a piezoelectric effect.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0052] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form part of the specification, illustrate various examples of the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0075] Embodiments of the present invention relate, in general, to improved systems, methods, and devices for monitoring the oral motor kinetics (OMK) of an infant during nutritive (NS) or non-nutritive (NNS) sucking.
[0076] Note: the term infant is broadly defined herein as including any infant mammal, not just human infants. Also, the term infant is further defined as including any age, i.e., ranging from premature infants (and mammals) to elderly people (and mammals).
[0077] One aspect of an embodiment of the present invention provides for an improved OMK monitoring system that simultaneously measures Suction and Expression forces and pressures applied to a nipple by the infant. This can be accomplished, for example, by using miniature/micro pressure transducers attached at specific locations on the nipple. For example, these can be placed flushed to the tip of the nipple, without protruding into the infant's mouth, to directly measure the Suction component of sucking, i.e. the negative intraoral pressure and also along the midsection/neck of the nipple to directly measure the Expression component of sucking, i.e. the positive compressive pressure generated by the compression and/or stripping of the nipple between the tongue and the hard palate.
[0078] Another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention is that an instrumented nipple should replicate a standard bottle (e.g., with respect to geometry, shape, texture, smoothness, symmetry, and stiffness/elasticity (durometry), with milk filling the entire chamber inside the nipple, especially when monitoring the Expression component of sucking, so that the infant's natural feeding regimen can be simulated as closely as possible.
[0079] Another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention provides an, OMK monitoring system, that when used on the same subject within the same time frame, comparing nonnutritive and nutritive sucking, can be used to determine whether an infant's oral feeding problems are due to issues with sucking, or due to some other physiological function, e.g., swallowing, breathing, upper gastrointestinal function, etc.
[0080]
[0081] Note that the examples shown in
[0082] In
[0083] In
[0084] As previously discussed, the Expression component of oral feeding generally comprises a combination of two different tongue actions (modes): 1) compression-only, where the tongue applies force perpendicular to the nipple's surface, without any lateral motion (i.e., no stripping), and 2) stripping, where the tongue moves (slides) laterally along the length of the nipple while also compressing the nipple. To determine if the mode of Expression consists primarily of compression-only or compression plus stripping, two (or more) separate pressure transducers are mounted in the nipple's neck region. The two (or more) transducers are spaced apart (staggered) along the length of the nipple. When spaced sufficiently far apart, the staggered pair of transducers provides the ability to monitor and detect a unique wave signature that is characteristic of the stripping action. During compression-only, the wave signature comprises a single pressure spike/pulse occurring at the same time at both transducers, which is generated when a tongue compresses all at once against the nipple. During compression plus stripping the wave signature comprises a pair of closely-spaced, sequential pressure spikes/pulses, which is generated when a tongue strips the nipple (typically, from nipple base to tip).
[0085] The embodiment shown in
[0086] The embodiment shown in
[0087] A pacifier having an instrumented OMK nipple as described, may be used to monitor Sucking and Expression behavior during a nonnutritive sucking episode.
[0088] In general, an instrumented OMK nipple can be adapted/coupled to a variety of liquid sources, including: a regular (standard) bottle for routine feeding; a milk reservoir connected to the nipple chamber via a third catheter; any other types of special feeding bottles. Alternatively, a transducer attached to a breast or a nipple shield can be instrumented as an OMK nipple.
[0089]
[0090] In general, Suction and Expression pressure transducer signals ( and +, respectively) generated by an instrumented OMK system with transducer 603 and 605 sheathed within Silastic tubing located external to the glove 601. The Suction pressure signal 615 and the Expression pressure signal 613 from signal transducers 603 and inside 605 are carried through 607 and 609 to the signal processor 617 and recorded at 619; a system similar to that described in
[0091] A sample tracing illustrating this particular combination of signals, taken using an embodiment of an OMK system that is configured to allow for the simultaneous recordings of pressure signals indicative of Suction, Expression, swallowing, and respiration is illustrated in
[0092]
[0093]
Other Types of Pressure Sensors
[0094] The phrases: pressure sensor, pressure transducer, and sensor/transducer plate are used interchangeably herein. A micro pressure transducer plate would be an example of an active pressure-sensing element.
[0095] Any, or all, of the following types of pressure sensing/sensor methods, effects, materials, and/or active sensing elements can be used in any embodiment of the present invention (e.g., an instrumented OMK nipple) including, but not limited to: capacitive, resistive, piezoelectric, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) structures, and optical-type pressure sensing elements and methods.
[0096] Any pressure sensors/transducers, which use optical pressure sensing elements can comprise: a Fabry-Perot cavity pressure sensing element, a Mach-Zender interferometer pressure sensing element, and/or a Bragg grating pressure sensing element.
[0097] Alternatively, pressure sensors/transducers used in any embodiment of the present invention can comprise a 1-dimensional (linear) configuration, or a two-dimensional (planar) array (i.e., matrix) of pressure sensing elements. The pressure strips or pads can output a 1-D or 2-D map or profile of a (time-dependent, dynamic) pressure distribution along a line (straight or curved) or within an area (which can be flat or curved), respectively. An array of pressure sensing elements can be called by a variety of names, including: a pressure sensitive pad (pressure pad), a tactile sensor/sensing array, an artificial electronic skin, a pressure mapping system, and a flexible pressure sensor. A substrate for holding/supporting the array of pressure sensing elements can be a rigid, semi-rigid, flexible, stretchable, or conformable substrate, depending on the application. The individual, active pressure sensing elements that make up the array can comprise any of the alternative types of pressure sensors listed above, including: capacitive, resistive, piezoelectric, PVDF, MEMS, and optical-type elements.
[0098] One or more pressure sensitive pads (pressure pad) can be attached/bonded to any part or surface of the nipple, using any compatible material, including: adhesive, glue, pressure-sensitive adhesive tape, heat-welded, fusion-bonded, ultrasonic bonding, cyanoacrylate, BPA-free silicone parylene conformal coating. Alternatively, the pressure pad(s) can be embedded within the sidewall of the nipple, for example, during injection and blow molding. Alternatively, the pressure pad(s) can be located on the inside (inner/interior) surface of the nipple's sidewall.
[0099]
[0100] Another embodiment of an instrumented nipple for an OMK system, comprising a pressure pad that is embedded within, and surrounded by, the nipple's sidewall, at the nipple's neck (mid-section region). This embodiment is useful because the pressure pad is physically isolated from the environment of the infant's mouth; any pieces that separate or become loose are contained within the nipple wall. Also, the pressure pad's electrical leads (wires) are protected, and less prone to breakage, because they are located within the nipple.
[0101] Another embodiment of an instrumented nipple for an OMK system, comprising a 2-D pressure pad attached to the interior/inner surface of the mid-section (i.e., neck) of the nipple's sidewall. This embodiment is useful because the pressure pad is physically isolated from the environment of the infant's mouth; any pieces that separate or become loose are contained within the nipple cavity. Also, the pressure pad's electrical leads (wires) are protected, and less prone to breakage, because they are located inside the nipple.
[0102] In general, a 1-D pressure array can be positioned at a variety of different locations, including, but not limited to: a) on the exterior surface of the nipple (as illustrated in the example of
[0103]
[0104] Another embodiment is an instrumented pacifier or fingerglove or nipple shield for an OMK system, comprises a 2-D tactile sensing array (i.e., pressure pad), for monitoring sucking and Expression in a non-nutritive setting. Alternatively, (not shown), a 1-D linear array of pressure sensing elements (i.e., a linear pressure strip), can be attached to the pacifier or finger gloves or nipple shield.
[0105] In other embodiments, a 1-D linear array of pressure sensing elements (i.e., a linear pressure strip), can be attached to a finger of the glove (in addition to, or in place of, a 2-D pressure pad). Alternatively, a 1-D linear pressure strip can be placed on one finger of the glove, and a 2-D pressure pad can be placed on a different finger of the same glove (e.g., on an adjacent finger). Alternatively, a 1-D linear pressure strip can be attached (i.e. taped) directly to a person's finger underneath a glove.
[0106]
[0107]
[0108]
Fluid Flow Rate Sensor
[0109] A coarse measurement can be made of the average volume of milk swallowed by an infant per suck (i.e., a bolus) by measuring or weighing the total volume of milk removed from a bottle during a feeding session and dividing that by the total number of sucks counted by an observer. However, this doesn't provide any information on the instantaneous flow rate during a suck, or the bolus of milk for a single suck.
[0110] In some embodiments of the present invention, the OMK monitoring system comprises a flow sensor means for measuring a volumetric (e.g., ml/s) and/or mass flow rate (e.g., g/s) of a fluid (e.g., milk) flowing out of a nipple during feeding. Preferably, the flow sensor means can measure, as a function of time, the instantaneous velocity or volumetric (or mass) flow rate of fluid flowing out of a nipple. An OMK monitoring system can comprise a flow sensor as the only instrumentation; or, alternatively, the system can additionally comprise other types of sensors (e.g., pressure sensor(s), optical sensor, temperature sensor, etc.).
[0111] The flow sensor means for measuring an instantaneous fluid flow rate (flow sensor) can utilize or comprise any of a wide variety of methods, devices, and structures that measure/respond to physical properties of a moving fluid (e.g., velocity, and, hence, volumetric or mass flow rate; pressure; density; etc.), including, but not limited to: pressure differential or pressure drop across a flow discontinuity or restriction (e.g., Venturi, calibrated orifice plate), ultrasonic techniques, thermal properties technique (e.g., Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTD) thermistor, hot-wire technique, thermal flow sensor), MEMS micro flow sensor, electrochemical techniques (electrolytes, electrical admittance, Lab-on-a-Chip), MEMS Coriolis-effect flowmeter (resonant tube), semiconductor field effect, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), and flow-based laser or optical techniques, as described below.
[0112] The volume of liquid (bolus, in ml) passing through the flow sensor, for a single suck, can be calculated by integrating the instantaneous measured flow rate (ml/s) over time, for the duration of the single suck. A typical bolus volume (per suck) is in the range of 0.1-0.4 ml. A typical volumetric flow rate during feeding is in the range of 0-6 ml/min.
A. Flow Rate Sensor Integrated with/within Nipple
[0113] A first class of flow rate sensors comprises one or more sensing elements that are integrated with or within the nipple itself (bottle nipple, nipple shield). With the use of miniature/micro-sized transducers (e.g., pressure transducers) and MEMS manufacturing techniques, it is possible to fabricate fluid flow sensors that are small enough to fit inside the rounded tip region of a nipple, or inserted into the nipple's exit hole. This is particularly useful, because the fluid flow properties (e.g., velocity, density, mass flow rate, volumetric flow rate) are preferably measured right at the point where the fluid leaves the nipple (i.e., the nipple exit hole).
[0114]
[0115] The calibrated orifice insert 2107 in
[0116] In general, the dimensions (length and diameter) of an orifice insert can be adjusted and optimized to produce a larger (or smaller) pressure drop, as needed, to better match the typical fluid flow rates generated by an infant during an oral feeding session.
[0117] Once the orifice has been calibrated, then the fluid flow rate is proportional to the square root of the pressure drop, P, where P=P.sub.1P.sub.2 2106, between the pressures at the inlet and outlet of the orifice. The calibrated orifice is typically pre-calibrated at the manufacturer by accurately measuring the flow rate as a function of pressure drop across the orifice. This results in a linear, straight-line plot with minimal scatter of data points.
[0118] In the device of
[0119]
[0120] Two different examples of means for measuring pressure are illustrated schematically in
[0121] On the right hand side of the orifice in
[0122] The pair of laser fiber optic pressure sensors can be, for example, a model No. OPP-M25, manufactured by OpSens, Inc., in Quebec, Canada (www.opsens.com). This model has an outer diameter of the sensing head of 0.25 mm (250 microns), a pressure range of 50 to +300 mm Hg, a precision of +/2 mm Hg, and a resolution of 0.5 mm Hg. OpSens also makes a larger fiber optic pressure sensor, OPP-M40, with a 0.4 mm (400 microns) OD of the sensing head. The smaller model, OPP-M25, is the smallest MEMS based optical pressure sensor available on the market today, and is used in a wide variety of medical applications, including: cardiovascular, intracranial, intrauterine, intraocular, intervertebral disc, urodynamic, and compartment pressure measurements. The optical sensor is immune to interference from radio frequency (RF) fields, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fields, and electromagnetic radiation from electro-surgery tools.
[0123] A principal difference between the embodiment shown in
[0124] In contrast, the pressure transducers in
[0125]
[0126] The dimensions (length and diameter) of the necked-down region in
[0127]
[0128]
[0129]
[0130] In the embodiment shown in
[0131] In some embodiments, the bottle nipple is modified to make it easier to use with miniature/micro pressure sensing catheters (e.g., Millar transducers, where the pressure sensing transducer plate(s) are mounted at the distal end of a small diameter (e.g., less than 1 mm dia.) catheter). The bottle nipple is modified so that the nipple has a section comprising thicker (i.e., thickened) sidewall located on the hard palate side (i.e., the side that would be against the infant's hard palate), and a normal-thickness sidewall on the side facing the infant's tongue. One or more channels or tunnels are disposed within the thickened sidewall section. The thickened sidewall makes the nipple slightly asymmetric (non-symmetric) with respect to the nipple's central axis. The tunnel also contains any parts of a pressure-sensing catheter that might come loose, and prevents those parts from being swallowed or inhaled by the infant. A disadvantage of inserting the pressure transducers within the tunnels is that the amplitude of the pressure signal will be reduced (dampened), as compared to the externalized transducers that are covered with the thin Silastic sheath (as shown in
[0132]
[0133] Alternatively, the tip of the second tunnel is closer to the base, than the first tunnel shown in
[0134]
[0135]
[0136]
[0137] Alternatively, the channels are open towards the outside of the nipple. After laying (placing) the catheters inside the open channels, the channels can be closed /secured by a number of different ways, for example: closing the opening with a piece of tape, or filling/caulking the channel with a flexible adhesive filler material (i.e., silicone).
Stand-Alone Flow Rate Sensor Module
[0138] A second class of flow rate sensors comprise one or more sensing elements contained inside a stand-alone flow rate module that is separate from the nipple, and positioned somewhere in-between the fluid reservoir (i.e., milk bottle) and the nipple. Preferably, the flow rate module can measure, as a function of time, the instantaneous velocity or volumetric (or mass) flow rate of fluid flowing into (or out of) the interior volume/space of the nipple. Since the flow rate module is further removed (2-4 cm) from the nipple tip, the measurement of flow rate (and, hence, bolus volume per suck) is a less-direct measurement. Allowing for changes in the internal volume of the nipple when compressed during Expression, the flow rate module should be able to measure negative fluid velocities (milk travelling in the opposite/backwards direction). Likewise, any numerical integration algorithm used to calculate the bolus volume per suck should be able to account for some period of time during a suck when the fluid velocity may be negative.
[0139] The flow rate module can utilize any of the wide variety (presented earlier) of methods, devices, and structures that are capable of measuring properties of a fluid in motion (and, hence, volumetric or mass flow rate), including, but not limited to: pressure differential/drop across a flow discontinuity/restriction (e.g., Venturi, calibrated orifice (P), ultrasonic, thermal flow technique (e.g., RTD thermistor, hot-wire technique), MEMS micromachines, electrochemical techniques (electrolytes, electrical admittance, Lab-on-a-Chip), MEMS Coriolis-effect flowmeter (resonant tube), semiconductor field effect, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), and flow-based laser/optical techniques.
[0140] A stand-alone flow rate module can have a generally cylindrical shape, and comprises at least one flow channel connecting a back end to a front end, for transferring fluid from the bottle to the nipple. The stand-alone module also comprises a flow rate sensing means for measuring the fluid's velocity and/or flow rate inside the at least one flow channel. The flow channel can have a necked-down or compressed region with a higher fluid velocity, where pressure drop measurements are made. The flow rate module can optionally comprise electronic means for wirelessly transmitting the measured and/or transformed data to a remote receiver (i.e., a laptop computer, a smart phone, or tablet).
[0141]
[0142]
[0143]
Alternative Concepts for Measuring Flow Rate
[0144] Other techniques can be used, in addition to, or in place of, a stand-alone or nipple-integrated flow rate sensor module or device. For example, the change in weight of liquid inside the reservoir (bottle) can be measured before and after a single suck, to get the bolus volume per suck. Or, the change in height of the liquid column inside the reservoir (bottle) can be measured, with the difference being proportional to the volume (bolus) of liquid lost during a single suck. The change in weight (W) can be measured by using a sensitive pressure transducer at the bottom of the bottle to measure small changes in pressure (weight of the fluid above the pressure transducer) when liquid is removed from the bottle during feeding.
[0145] Alternatively, the change in internal air pressure (increase in vacuum level) inside of a sealed bottle (i.e., no one-way, anti-vacuum valve) can be measured with a sensitive pressure transducer placed at or near the top of the bottle. The removal of a bolus of liquid during a single suck creates an incremental change in the vacuum pressure level (via the relationship PV=NRT), which can be measured, in real-time, by the pressure transducer. Once a particular bottle's geometry has been calibrated (and assuming a bottle with a constant cross-section along its length), then the drop in internal air pressure measured by the pressure transducer, in real-time, will correlate directly to the volume of liquid removed, in real-time, from the nipple. This technique was used by Jain, et. al. (18).
[0146] Alternatively, the change in height (H) of the liquid column inside the bottle can be measured by a laser beam liquid level sensing system, or by an ultrasonic liquid level sensing system, along with the appropriate electronics and hardware/software data analysis equipment. To get more accurate measurements of change in height of the liquid column, the system can optionally include: 1) an anti-slosh structure inside the bottle (e.g., a bundle of straws or small diameter tubes, or a sponge, which damps unwanted waves/sloshing), and/or 2) a MEMS-based horizontal level detector/indicator mounted to the side of the bottle, for indicating when the bottle is being held vertically (via a buzzing sound, or via LED signal lights, or via a liquid crystal numeric display indicating the bottle's tilt angle in degrees).
Integrated Wireless Instrumentation Module
[0147] With the Integrated Chip (IC) technology available today, it is possible to fabricate a compact, miniaturized, integrated wireless instrumentation module (IM) that fits snugly into/inside of the base of a standard nipple, which incorporates an integrated microprocessor, A/D convertors, flow sensor and pressure transducer electronics, battery, transmitter, and antenna.
[0148]
Optical Instrumentation
[0149] In some embodiments, an OMK monitoring system can comprise a micro-sized video camera (not shown) (i.e., CCD or CMOS) device mounted at, or near, the nipple tip 2713 for viewing into the infants' mouth. Also, a miniature LED light source (which can be an infrared source) can be mounted at, or near, the nipple's tip for providing illumination of the infant's mouth and oral cavity.
[0150]
Acoustic Instrumentation
[0151] In some embodiments, an OMK monitoring system can comprise one or more microphones or acoustic transducers inside and/or outside of the nipple for generating and/or listening to and/or recording acoustic sounds from inside of the nipple or inside of the infant's oral cavity during feeding. Analysis of these sounds may be correlated to the different types of oral feeding techniques (i.e., Suction and Expression), and may be correlated to other sounds (sounds of swallowing or breathing/respiration).
Temperature Instrumentation
[0152] In some embodiments, an OMK monitoring system can comprise one or more means for measuring temperature inside and/or outside of the nipple (e.g., inside of the infant's mouth during feeding). The means for measuring temperature can include, for example: thermocouples, thermistors/RTD strips on a substrate, and IR camera/CCD chips.
[0153]
[0154]
Fabrication of Suction Channel
[0155]
[0156] An example of a method of fabricating the Suction Channel is as follows. The Suction PE tubing is pre-inserted at the factory in a constant (repeatable) manner using a block template with a pre-formed/pre-cast channel into which the PE tubing will be inserted via a curved needle, such that the PE tubing will be always in the same position in relation to the inside and outside of the tubing vs. the nipple hole. The PE tubing is inserted with a trocard/wire to maintain patency of PE tubing when the transducer is inserted. At the time of use:
1) Remove trocard/wire;
2) Insert Pressure Sensor transducer;
3) Use blue Luer-lock to tighten in place.
REFERENCES
[0157] The following references are incorporated herein by reference:
[0158] 1. Wolff, P. H. (1968) The serial organization of sucking in the young infant. Pediatrics 42: 943-956.
[0159] 2. Jain, L., Sivieri, E., Abbasi, S. & Bhutani, V. K. (1987) Energetics and mechanics of nutritive sucking in the preterm and term neonate. J Pediatr 111: 894-898.
[0160] 3. deMonterice, D., Meier, P. P., Engstrom, J. L., Crichton, C. L. & Mangurten, H. H. (1992) Concurrent validity of a new instrument for measuring nutritive sucking in preterm infants. Nurs. Res. 41: 342-346.
[0161] 4. Kron, R. E., Ipsen, J. & Goddard, K. E. (1968) Consistent individual differences in the nutritive sucking behavior of the human newborn. Psychosom. Med 30: 151-161.
[0162] 5. Mathew, O. P., Clark, M. L., Pronske, M. L., Luha-Solarzano, H. G. & Peterson, M. D. (1985) Breathing pattern and ventilation during oral feeding in term newborn infants. J Pediatr 106: 810-813.
[0163] 6. Sameroff, A. J. (1968) The components of sucking in the human newborn. J Exp. Child Psychol. 6: 607-623.
[0164] 7. Dubignon, J. & Campbell, D. (1969) Sucking in the newborn during a feed. J Exp. Child Psychol. 7: 282-298.
[0165] 8. Lau, C., Sheena, H. R., Shulman, R. J. & Schanler, R. J. (1997) Oral feeding in low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 130: 561-569.
[0166] 9. Lau, C., Alagugurusamy, R., Schanler, R. J., Smith, E. O. & Shulman, R. J. (2000) Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding. Acta Paediatr 89: 846-852.
[0167] 10. Ardran, G. M., Kemp, F. H. & Lind, J. A. (1958) Cineradiographic study of breastfeeding. Br J Radiol 31: 156-162.
[0168] 11. Ardran, G. M., Kemp, F. H. & Lind, J. (1958) A cineradiographic study of bottle feeding. Br J Radiol 31: 11-22.
[0169] 12. Fucile, S., Gisel, E. G., McFarland, D. H. & Lau, C. (2011) Oral and non-oral sensorimotor interventions enhance oral feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 53: 829-835.
[0170] 13. Lau, C. & Smith, E. O. (2011) A Novel Approach to Assess Oral Feeding Skills of Preterm Infants. Neonatology. 100: 64-70.
[0171] 14. Lau C (2012) Development of oral feeding skills in the preterm infant. In: The Handbook of Growth and Growth Monitoring in Health and Disease, Pt 3 (VR Preedy ed.), pp. 499-512. Springer, NewYork, N.Y.
[0172] 15. Lau, C. & Smith, E. (2012) Interventions to Improve the Oral Feeding Performance of Preterm Infants. Acta Paediatr ePrint.
[0173] 16. Lau C (2012) Is there an advantage for preterm infants to feed orally in an upright or sidelying position? J Neonatal Nursing.
[0174] 17. Lau, C. & Kusnierczyk, I. (2001) Quantitative evaluation of infant's nonnutritive and nutritive sucking. Dysphagia 16: 58-67.
[0175] 18. Jain, L., Sivieri, E., Abbasi, S. & Bhutani, V. K. (1987) Energetics and mechanics of nutritive sucking in the preterm and term neonate. J. Pediatr. 111: 894-898.
[0176] Wolf L S, Glass R P, Feeding and swallowing disorders in infancy: assessment and management. Tucson: Therapy Skills Builders, 1992.
[0177] Arvedson J C, Lefton-Greif M A, Pediatric videofluoroscopic swallow studies. A profession manual with caregiver guidelines. San Antonio: Communication Skill Builders, 1998.
[0178] Daniels H, Casaer P, Devlieger H, Eggermont E 1986 Mechanisms of feeding efficiency in preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 5:593-596
[0179] Gryborski J 1965 The swallowing mechanism of the neonate. Pediatrics 35:445-452
[0180] Lau C, Hurst N 1999 Oral feeding in infants. Curr Probl Pediatr 29:105-124
[0181] Lau C, Schanler, R J. Oral feeding in infant: Advantage of a self-paced milk flow. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 453-9
[0182] Simpson C, Schanler R J, Lau C. Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 517-522
[0183] Fucile S, Gisel, E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 230-236
[0184] Lau C, Smith E O, Schanler R J. Coordination of suck-swallow and swallow-respiration in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92:721-7
[0185] Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Effect of an oral stimulation program on the maturation of sucking skills of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2005; 47: 158-62
[0186] Scheel C E, Schanler R J, Lau C. Does the choice of bottle nipple affect the oral feeding performance of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants? Acta Physiologica, 2005; 94: 1266-72
[0187] Amaizu N, Shulman R J, Schanler R J, Lau C. Maturation of oral feeding skills in very low birth weight infants. Acta Paediatr 2008, 97: 61-7
[0188] Fucile S, Gisel E, Schanler R J; Lau C. A vacuum-free bottle enhances preterm infants' nutritive sucking skills. Dysphagia 2009, 24:145-51 (DOI 10.1007/s00455-008-9182-z)
[0189] Rasch S, Sangild P T, Gregersen H, Schmidt M, Oman T, Lau C. The preterm pigleta model in the study of esophageal development in preterm neonates Acta Paediatrica 2010, 99: 201-8 (DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01564.x)
[0190] Fucile S, McFarland D H, Gisel E G, Lau C. Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants. Dysphagia. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88:345-550 (doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.09.007).