FLEXIBLE FOAM FORMULATION
20190169394 ยท 2019-06-06
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C08G18/7671
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J2203/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/1833
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/4018
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/4829
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J9/142
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/4812
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J9/149
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J2203/14
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J2201/022
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08J2205/05
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C08G18/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
Two-component formulation for producing open-cell flexible foams having compressive strength of 1N/cm.sup.2, contained in 2-component aerosol can with crosslinker sleeve which can be opened prior to deploying formulation from aerosol can wherein the contents thereof enter aerosol can, wherein first component is present in aerosol can and second component that is reactive to first component is present separately in crosslinker sleeve and wherein aerosol can includes prepolymer composed of 25-35% by weight MDI and 40-55% by weight of polyol mixture having free isocyanate groups, and 10-21% by weight of propellant gas mixture and crosslinker sleeve includes 4-10% by weight of crosslinker mixture, wherein weight data are based on weight of formulation. Polyol mixture includes at least one trifunctional polyether and bifunctional polyester polyols, together with flame retardant, foam stabilizer, cell opener, amine catalyst, and crosslinker mixture including ethylene glycol in deficiency relative to free isocyanate groups and amine catalyst.
Claims
1. A two-component formulation for producing open-cell flexible foams having a compressive strength of 1N/cm.sup.2, contained in a 2-component aerosol can with a crosslinker sleeve which can be opened prior to deploying the formulation from the aerosol can such that the contents thereof enter the aerosol can, wherein a first component is present in the aerosol can and a second component that is reactive to the first component is present separately in the crosslinker sleeve and wherein the aerosol can comprises a prepolymer composed of 25 to 35% by weight MDI and 40 to 55% by weight of a polyol mixture having free isocyanate groups, and 10 to 21% by weight of a propellant gas mixture and the crosslinker sleeve comprises 4 to 10% by weight of a crosslinker mixture wherein the weight data are based on the weight of the formulation, wherein the polyol mixture comprises at least one trifunctional polyether polyol and at least one bifunctional polyester polyol, together with a flame retardant, a foam stabilizer, a cell opener and an amine catalyst, and the crosslinker mixture comprises ethylene glycol in deficiency relative to the free isocyanate groups of the prepolymer and an amine catalyst.
2. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ethylene glycol in the crosslinker sleeve is sufficient to saturate 80 to 95% of the free isocyanate groups of the prepolymer.
3. The formulation as claimed in claim 2, wherein the ethylene glycol in the crosslinker sleeve is sufficient to saturate 85 to 90% of the free isocyanate groups of the prepolymer.
4. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio by weight of polyols to the flame retardant in the polyol mixture is in the range from 85:15 to 60:40.
5. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol mixture comprises flame retardant.
6. The formulation as claimed in claim 5, wherein the polyol mixture comprises ethylene glycol and flame retardant in a ratio by weight in the range from 35:65 to 60:40.
7. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol mixture comprises a catalyst which is capable of catalyzing the reaction of isocyanate groups with water.
8. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the crosslinker mixture comprises two catalysts which are capable of catalyzing the reaction of isocyanate groups with ethylene glycol.
9. The formulation as claimed in claim 8, wherein the crosslinker mixture comprises bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether and 2-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ethanol as catalysts.
10. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the crosslinker mixture comprises a dye.
11. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol mixture comprises a halogenated aliphatic polyol.
12. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyol mixture comprises propane, butane and dimethyl ether as propellant gas mixture.
13. The formulation as claimed in claim 12, wherein the propellant gas mixture comprises 40 to 70% by weight dimethyl ether, based on the propellant gas mixture.
14. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the MDI is crude MDI.
15. A method comprising applying the formulation of claim 1 for foam-filling cavities.
16. The method as claimed in claim 15 for sound insulation.
Description
EXAMPLE 1
[0035] A polyol mixture for a foam formulation was composed as follows:
[0036] 73.0 parts by weight polyether polyol, OHN 56
[0037] 15.6 parts by weight TMCP
[0038] 5.0 parts by weight arom. polyester polyol based on PET, OHN 200 [0039] 1.0 part by weight polyoxypropylene triol, OHN 56 [0040] 1.0 part by weight foam stabilizer [0041] 1.4 parts by weight cell opener [0042] 1.4 parts by weight catalyst (DMDEE)
[0043] For this purpose, the following crosslinker mixture was prepared:
[0044] 77.50 parts by weight ethylene glycol
[0045] 20.70 parts by weight TMCP [0046] 0.70 part by weight catalyst (2,2-dimethylaminoethyl ether) [0047] 0.50 part by weight catalyst (2-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethanol) [0048] 0.60 part by weight dye, OHN 100
[0049] 44.0 parts by weight of the polyol mixture were reacted with 33.8 parts by weight crude MDI (Desmodur) to give a prepolymer. The crosslinker sleeve was filled with 6.10 parts by weight of the crosslinker mixture which was employed in the bottom of the aerosol can. Subsequently, 7.8 parts by weight of a propane/butane mixture and 8.5 parts by weight dimethyl ether were filled under pressure into the closed aerosol can. This gave a functional foam formulation for a flexible elastic foam with good flow characteristics after deployment and a significantly improved sound insulation compared to commercial rigid foam formulations (65 dB compared to 60 dB).
EXAMPLE 2
[0050] The polyol mixture in example 1 was modified as follows:
[0051] 72.6 parts by weight polyether polyol, OHN 56
[0052] 20.0 parts by weight TMCP [0053] 3.0 parts by weight polyester polyol based on PET, OHN 200 [0054] 1.0 part by weight halogenated polyetherol, OHN 239 [0055] 1.0 part by weight silicone stabilizer [0056] 1.0 part by weight cell opener [0057] 1.4 parts by weight DMDEE
[0058] 51.3 parts by weight of the polyol mixture were reacted with 29.3 parts by weight crude MDI to give a prepolymer. The crosslinker sleeve was filled with 5.5 parts by weight of the crosslinker mixture of example 1 and employed in the bottom of the can. Then, 5.5 parts by weight of a propane/butane mixture and 8.5 parts by weight dimethyl ether were compressed into the closed aerosol can. On deploying the formulation, a flexible elastic foam resulted, which was non-adhesive after 8 minutes, ready for cutting after 12 minutes and had an end compressive strength of 0.8 N/cm.sup.2. The sound insulation properties were comparable with that of the foam of example 1.