ADHERED OBJECT REMOVAL METHOD

Abstract

A method for removing hard adhered objects is provided whereby adhered objects adhering to a jig in a film deposition process using crystal growth are efficiently removed while reducing damage to the jig. This adhered object removal method includes a step for preparing a jetting media with a lower hardness than the jig, a step for jetting the jetting media toward the jig, and a step for forming fracture starting points at the crystal grain boundary of the adhered object when the jetting media collides with the jig, then causing further collision of jetting media to cause the adhered object to dislodge at the crystal grain boundary.

Claims

1. An adhered object removal method for removing adhered objects from jig used in film deposition processes accomplished by thin film crystal growth, comprising: preparing a jetting media having a lower hardness than the hardness of the jig; and jetting the jetting media toward the jig;

2. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, whereby in the jetting, the jetting media forms fracture starting points at a crystal grain boundary of the adhered object when the jetting media collides with the jig, and the jetting media collides with the fracture starting points and causes the adhered objects to dislodge at the crystal grain boundary.

3. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jetting media hardness is or less the jig hardness.

4. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the adhered objects are harder than the jig.

5. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jig has a Vickers hardness within a range of Hv100 to Hv918, and the jetting media has a Rockwell hardness within a range of R15 to R125 or a range of M20 to M125 and is collided with the jig at a collision energy within a range of 1.410.sup.7 J to 5.410.sup.4 J.

6. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jig has a ceramic coating layer, and the jetting media has a Young's modulus of 50 GPa or greater and is collided with the jig at a collision energy within a range of 1.010.sup.9 J to 1.010.sup.8 J.

7. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jetting media grains have corner portions.

8. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jetting media is of approximately the same material as the adhered object.

9. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, whereby the jetting media does not contain a metal component, and adhered objects are removed by collision energy when the jetting media jetted toward the jig collides with the jig.

10. The adhered object removal method of claim 9, wherein at least a surface layer of the jetting media is comprised of resin.

11. The adhered object removal method of claim 10, wherein an outside shape of the jetting media is formed in a convex curved surface.

12. The adhered object removal method of claim 11, wherein the jetting media has an average grain size within a range of 50 m to 400 m.

13. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, further comprising heating the jig to which the adhered objects are adhered, and second jetting with the jetting media toward the heated jig.

14. The adhered object removal method of claim 13, whereby in the heating, the jig is heated to a temperature within a range of 500 C. to 1000 C.

15. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the jig is formed of quartz glass.

16. The adhered object removal method of claim 1, wherein the film deposition process is a metal organic chemical vapor deposition method.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

[0041] FIG. 1 is a schematic explaining a processing apparatus used in an embodiment.

[0042] FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing the adhered object removal method of the embodiment.

[0043] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram explaining the travel path of a workpiece in the embodiment.

[0044] FIG. 4 is a SEM photograph showing the appearance when adhered objects are removed.

[0045] FIG. 5 is a SEM photograph comparing removal of adhered objects by the adhered object removal method of the embodiment with removal of adhered objects by conventional art.

[0046] FIG. 6 is a photograph explaining the case where a step is provided in the adhered object removal method of the embodiment to heat the workpiece.

EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

[0047] Referring to figures, we explain an embodiment of the adhered object removal method according to the present invention. Changes, modifications, and improvements may be applied without limitation to this embodiment of the invention so long as they do not deviate from the scope of the invention. Also, unless otherwise noted, the left, right, up, and down directions in the explanation refer to directions in the figures.

[0048] FIG. 1 shows the processing apparatus 01 used in the present embodiment. The processing apparatus 01 comprises: an enclosure 10, a volumetric supply mechanism 20, a separator mechanism 30, a suction mechanism 40, a nozzle 50, and a control mechanism 60.

[0049] A processing chamber R is formed on the interior of the enclosure 10; an operator gains access to the processing chamber R by opening a door 11 disposed on the front face thereof. A nozzle affixing jig 12 for affixing the nozzle, a processing table 13 opposing the nozzle for loading a workpiece W (a jig to which adhered objects are adhered), and a transport mechanism 14 linked to the processing table 13 are disposed in the processing chamber R.

[0050] The nozzle affixing jig 12 is configured so that the distance between the nozzle 50 and the workpiece W can be freely adjusted.

[0051] The transport mechanism 14 is a mechanism for freely moving the processing table 13 (i.e., the workpiece W) in a horizontal direction (the left-right direction in FIG. 1; the vertical direction relative to the paper surface) relative to the nozzle. For example, an appropriate known mechanism such as an X-Y stage may be selected.

[0052] The discharge opening 15 is affixed to a stand 15 disposed at the bottom of the nozzle 50. In this embodiment, it is a panel with a large number of holes. Grain bodies jetted from the nozzle 50 are able to pass through toward the bottom portion.

[0053] The volumetric supply mechanism 20 is not particularly limited with respect to structure so long as it is capable of dispensing jetting media in fixed quantities. For example, it may be a screw feeder, a vibration feeder, or a table feeder. In this embodiment a screw feeder was used.

[0054] The volumetric supply mechanism 20 is linked to a storage hopper 31 linked to the separator mechanism 30. The separator mechanism 30 is linked to the bottom portion of the enclosure 10 through a transport pipe P, therefore the processing chamber R and the storage hopper form a space linked through the transport pipe P. In this embodiment we used a cyclone-type sorter as the separator mechanism 30, but air-type sorters or screen-type sorters may also be used.

[0055] Suction and direct pressure-type nozzles are known nozzles for jetting particles; either of these may be selected. In the present embodiment we selected a suction-type nozzle. The nozzle 50 of the present embodiment comprises a nozzle holder and an air nozzle into which this nozzle holder is inserted. The air nozzle is linked to a compressor (not shown) through the air hose H1, and the nozzle holder is connected to the storage hopper 31 through a jetting media hose H2. Jetting media is drawn into the nozzle by the negative pressure arising inside the nozzle holder as a result of operating a compressor to jet compressed air from the nozzle; this is then mixed on the inside thereof and jetted as a solid/vapor two phase flow.

[0056] The control mechanism 60 controls all the aforementioned structures. Various types of computing devices such as personal computers, motion controllers such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and digital signal processors (DSPs), and multifunction portable terminals or high functioning cell phones or the like may be used as the control mechanism.

[0057] Next, again referring to FIG. 2, we explain an adhered object removal method using the processing apparatus 01 of the present embodiment. The adhered object removal method of the present invention can be applied to remove hard adhered objects adhered to a jig in a crystal growth deposition process. It is particularly effective when objects are adhered to jigs made of easily damaged materials. In the present embodiment we explain a method for removing adhered objects adhering to a jig used when depositing a film using the metal organic chemical vapor deposition method (MOCVD method).

[0058] In the structure of a semiconductor device using the MOCVD method, a hard coating of GaN or AIN is formed on the substrate. In more detail, fine crystals of GaN or AIN or the like are formed on the substrate, and a polycrystal coating is formed by the growth of those crystals. At such times, these hard coatings are also formed on jigs such as a tray, a receptor, or an opposing plate. That is, the adhered objects on the jig is this hard coating film, and a crystal grain boundary is present in these adhered objects. Trays, receptors, and opposing plates are sometimes made up of quartz glass. In this case, there is a large grain size difference relative to the adhered objects, and hard adhered objects are present on the surface of the easily-damaged jig. That is, when adhered objects are processed under conditions allowing their removal in an adhered object removal method whereby adhered objects are ground off by collisions by hard abrasive grains, as in the conventional art, the jig receives major damage.

S1: Workpiece Prewash

[0059] Adhered objects adhering by a relatively weak adhesion force may be removed in advance by a brush or the like. This step may also be omitted.

S2: Preparing the Processing Apparatus

[0060] The suction mechanism 40 is operated to suction the processing chamber R. Next, the lock on door 11 is released and the door 11 is opened. Next, a certain amount of jetting media is introduced into the processing chamber R and jetting media is transported to the volumetric supply mechanism 20 through the transport pipe P and the separator mechanism 30. The door 11 is then closed and locked. The processing chamber R is suctioned by the suction mechanism 40 and is therefore at a negative pressure, so that outside air flows into the processing chamber R through suction holes (not shown) disposed to communicate with the outside.

[0061] As a preparatory step, angular jetting media with corner portions was prepared. Then, taking into account damage to the jig arising from collision of the jetting media, a jetting media softer than the jig was prepared. The hardness of the jetting media may be or less the hardness of the jig.

[0062] When jig hardness (Vickers hardness as specified in JIS Z2244: 2009 or JIS R1610: 2003 (ISO 6507)) is HV100 to HV918, the hardness of the jetting media (Rockwell hardness specified in JIS K7202: 2001 (ISO 6508)) may be R15 to R125 or M20 to M125. Examples of materials satisfying these specifications include, for jigs: stainless steel, aluminum, titanium, glass, quartz glass and the like, and for jetting media: glass, melamine resin, urea resin, unsaturated polyester, sodium bicarbonate, nylon, dry ice, walnut shells, peach pits, apricot pits, and the like.

[0063] When a jig is formed of compound materials, there is a potential that coating layers will be ground off or peel upon impact by the jetting media, depending on coating layer thickness, coating layer shape, and the like. If there are defects such as cracks or pinholes in the base material, those cracks may give rise to coating layer fractures when the jetting media makes impact. In light of this, a jet media collision energy of 1.010.sup.9 J to 1.010.sup.8 J may be used when selecting material with a relatively high rigidity as the jetting media. As a jetting media with relatively high rigidity, a material with a Young's modulus, as specified in JIS R1602: 1995, of 50 GPa or greater may be selected, and a 100 GPa to 800 GPa material may be selected. Examples of such material include various ceramic materials such as quartz glass, alumina, aluminum nitride, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, and the like.

[0064] In all types of jigs, the jetting media remains on the jig, so in some cases coating performance declines due to components originating from the jetting media when film is deposited using the jig. Material can be selected so as not to adversely affect the post-deposition coating even if jetting media remains on the jig. For example, if the jetting media and coating are approximately the same material, then even if jetting media does remain on the jig, the remaining components will have the same materials as the coating. Therefore even if components originating in the jetting media are mixed in during depositions using this jig, those components are of the same material as the coating, so effects on coating performance can be reduced.

[0065] As discussed below, it is necessary to know the mass of the jetting media. For this purpose, grains with known true specific gravity may be used, or true specific gravity can be measured in advance by known methods such as the pycnometer method.

[0066] The control mechanism 60 on the processing apparatus 01 is operated to turn the electromagnetic valve disposed on the path supplying pressurized air to the nozzle 50 to OPEN, and the volumetric supply mechanism 20 to ON. This action causes jetting media to be supplied to the nozzle 50 and jetted from the nozzle 50. Here the quantity of jetting media is adjusted, but there is no particular limitation regarding this adjustment method. For example, the correlation between jetting media physical properties (type, grain size, etc.), jetting pressure, and jetting velocity can be measured in advance and, based on these results, the jetting pressure can be adjusted to achieve the desired jetting velocity. In this embodiment, the relationship of jetting pressure and jetting velocity to physical properties of the jetting media are first measured using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), then a compressed air supply pressure adjustment valve (not shown) is operated to adjust so that the jetting media jetting velocity is at the desired velocity.

[0067] After adjusting the jetting velocity, the processing apparatus 01 control mechanism 60 is operated to respectively switch the above-described electromagnetic valve to CLOSED and the volumetric supply mechanism 20 to OFF. This operation stops jetting of the jetting media. The door 11 is opened and the workpiece W is loaded on the processing table 13 and fixed in place. The distance between the nozzle 50 and the workpiece W is then adjusted using the affixing jig 12. When all this work is completed, the door 11 is closed and locked.

[0068] Processing conditions such as workpiece W motion trajectory (X and Y direction distances in FIG. 3), motion speed, and number of sweeps are input into the control mechanism 60.

S3: Adhered Object Removal

[0069] In the jetting step, the processing apparatus 01 control mechanism 60 is operated to turn the above-described electromagnetic valve to OPEN and the volumetric supply mechanism 20 to ON, resulting in jetting of jetting media. Next, the transport mechanism 14 is turned to ON and the workpiece W is moved horizontally relative to the nozzle. For example, the sweep trajectory of the center C of the workpiece W shown in FIG. 3 is one which repeatedly sweeps from the end of the workpiece W into the jetting media jetting area A in the X direction, then offsets by a predetermined pitch in the Y direction, then returns in the X direction, in a comb tooth pattern. By moving the workpiece W in this way relative to the nozzle, jetting media can be collided with the entire surface of the workpiece. Here, when the nozzle 50 jetting port is formed as a rectangle, the jetting width for jetting media in a single X direction sweep can be increased by arranging so that the long side of the port is in the Y direction to improve jetting treatment efficiency.

[0070] When the jig is moved down to the bottom of the nozzle 50 jetting port, the jetting media collides with the workpiece. At the start of the collision, starting points for fracture are formed at the crystal interface by the corner portions of the jetting media. Further collisions by the jetting media cause crystal grains to peel off at those starting points.

[0071] Here a lower jetting media hardness is more advantageous from the standpoint to the jig, but if hardness is too low, the ability to form starting points for fracture of the crystal interface is insufficient. While there are advantages to high hardness, such as shorter working time and easy cleaning in subsequent steps due to low residual jetting media on the jig after working, damage to workpieces is great when hardness is too high.

[0072] When collision energy upon the impact of jetting media with the workpiece W is too small, the ability to form fracture starting points at crystal interfaces is insufficient, and when too high, adhered objects are removed, but damage to the workpiece is great. In order to remove adhered objects with little damage to the workpiece W and with good efficiency, the jet media collision energy may be 1.410.sup.7 J to 5.410.sup.4 J. Also, to remove adhered objects effectively while minimizing damage to the workpiece W, a jet media collision energy of 1.010.sup.6 J to 1.010.sup.4 J is desirable. Jetting media collision energy can be calculated by the expression mv.sup.2, where m is the jetting media mass and v is the jetting media velocity. The jetting media mass may also be calculated by first calculating a volume by approximating the jetting media as a sphere using its average diameter, then multiplying by specific gravity .

[0073] The appearance of peeling at the crystal interface is shown in the SEM micrograph in FIG. 4. It will be seen that prior to working, crystal grains in the surface are observed, but in the depth direction crystals precisely stack up for form a coating (Prior to Working in the figure). It can be seen that this work in the present embodiment results in peeling of the coating at the crystal grain boundary (During Working in the figure). Thereafter, adhered objects are completely removed from the jig surface (After Working in the figure). Here it is presumed that the surface roughness is from damage received by the jig when depositing films. Adhered objects were removed with chemicals and the jig surface was observed by SEM; the same kind of roughness was confirmed to have formed.

[0074] FIG. 5 shows SEM micrographs comparing the results of removing adhered objects by the method of the present embodiment and of removing adhered objects by a conventional art method (collide with hard abrasive grain to remove adhered objects). It is observed that with the conventional method, the jig surface is ground by the jetting media. Also, it was confirmed by measurement with an integrated surface roughness and profilometer that when removing adhered objects by the conventional method, the jig surface is ground by the jetting media. Therefore using the method of the present embodiment, adhered objects can be removed with minimal damage to the jig.

[0075] Powder dust (removed adhered objects or jetting media diminished to an non-reusable size) produced by the jetting media and by working is transported to the separator mechanism 30 by the suction force of the suction mechanism 40. In the separator mechanism 30, reusable jetting media (No. 1) is separated from dust, and non-reusable jetting media (No. 1) is piled up in a storage hopper 31. The non-reusable jetting media (first) accumulated in the storage hopper 31 is transported to the nozzle 50 and re-jetted. In the meantime, light weight dust is suctioned into the suction mechanism 40 and captured by collection filters installed on the interior of the suction mechanism 40.

S4: Workpiece Recovery

[0076] After the specified work is completed, a control means is used to respectively switch the transport mechanism 14 to OFF, the above-described electromagnetic valve to CLOSED, and the volumetric supply mechanism 20 to OFF. Thereafter the door 11 is unlocked, the door 11 is opened, and the workpiece W is recovered. Jetting media or dust adhering to the workpiece W are removed by blowing air or by ultrasonic cleaning or the like, and the series of work steps is complete.

[0077] It can occur that adhered objects remain on a workpiece, in locations far from the workpiece W base material loading portions, even if the workpiece has passed through S1-S3. This is speculated to be either because crystals bond strongly to one another in the residue of adhered objects, or that there is no crystal grain boundary. When adhered object residue is present, it is also acceptable to additionally perform steps S5-S8 below. When there is no residual adhered object, these steps may of course be omitted.

S5: Heat Workpiece

[0078] An isothermal vessel kept at a specified temperature on its interior is prepared; as a heating step, the workpiece is placed on the inside thereof and heated. Because the coefficients of thermal expansion differ between the jig and the adhered objects, the tight adhesion force between the jig and the adhered objects drops when heated to a specified temperature. It is sufficient to reduce the adhesion force to the level where adhered objects can be removed in the S7 step described below; excessive heating leads to energy losses. Also, jig life is reduced by imparting thermal damage to the jig by heating it to the vicinity of the jig's softening temperature, for example. The heating temperature may be 500 C. to 1000 C., or may also be 800-1000 C.

S6: Workpiece Cooling

[0079] The workpiece is cooled to room temperature. If cooling is fast, fine cracks form in the adhered objects, so although the adhered objects can be easily removed in the later S7 step, the jig is also thermally damaged. A cooling speed is determined so that adhered objects can be easily removed in the S7 step, but there is no thermal damage to the jig. So long as these two aspects are satisfied, cooling can also be accomplished by leaving the workpiece in a room.

S7: Adhered Object Removal

[0080] As a second jetting step, the jetting media is jetted toward the workpiece W by performing the same operations as in steps S1-S3. As described above, when a jetting media softer than the jig is used, damage to the jig can be limited, but it is also acceptable to use the same jetting media as was used in the S3 step. The adhesive strength of the adhered objects to the jig is reduced by heating, and because of its hard and brittle nature, cracks in adhered objects occur from collisions with the jetting media, and adhered objects are removed, with these cracks serving as starting points.

S8: Workpiece Recovery

[0081] The workpiece W is recovered by the same operation as the S4 step; jetting media and dust, etc., adhering to the workpiece are removed by air blowing or by an ultrasonic cleaner or the like, and this sequence of work is completed.

[0082] Results of the adhered object removal performed in steps S05-S08 are shown in FIG. 6. The left diagram shows the appearance of adhered objects remaining on a workpiece W which has passed through steps S1-S4. The middle figure shows the workpiece after it has been heated then cooled (S5, S6). It can be seen that adhered objects are not removed by heating and cooling alone. The right figure shows the condition after jetting media has been jetted onto a workpiece W subjected to this heating and cooling (S7, S8). This shows that adhered objects on the entire workpiece W can be removed by passing through steps S5-S8.

[0083] Next we explain results of removing adhered objects from the workpiece by the adhered object removal method of the first embodiment of the invention.

[0084] Taking into account the actual jig usage environment, we prepared as a jig-equivalent base material the piece shown below, in which two types of base material were held for 10 minutes at 1000 C., then cooled to room temperature, and this cycle was repeated 200 times. (Unless otherwise noted, base material A and base material B are referred to collectively below as virtual jig):

[0085] Base material A: Quartz plate (2 inch1.0 mm thick; Vickers hardness Hv714 to Hv918)

[0086] Base material B: A plate of compound materials. A carbon plate on which an SiC coating layer (thickness: 120 m) is formed (2 inch1.0 mm thick; coating layer Vickers hardness Hv 2200).

[0087] The nozzle was arranged so the distance between the nozzle and the workpiece was 100 mm, and the angle of the jetting flow relative to the workpiece 90. Jetting media was then jetted for 5 minutes to a fixed point on the workpiece.

[0088] After working, the cutting depth (loss) on the virtual jig was confirmed using an integrated surface roughness/profilometer. Evaluation criteria were as follows:

[0089] Base Material Loss Evaluation

[0090] : cutting depth is less than 3 m

[0091] : cutting depth is 3 m-5 m

[0092] : cutting depth exceeds 5 m

[0093] For conditions in which the Base Material Loss Evaluation result was either a or a , further removal of adhered objects was performed. A film-forming operation was repeated 10 times using the MOCVD method to form a 50 m thick coating on a virtual jig to which the preceding processing had been applied. This film was GaN relative to base material A and AIN relative to base material B.

[0094] In the same manner as described above, an adhered object (coating) was removed by jetting with jetting media for 5 minutes to a fixed point on a virtual jig on which a film was formed.

[0095] After working, removal of the adhered objects was confirmed by microscope observation and by EDX analysis:

[0096] Evaluation of Adhered Object Removal

[0097] : No residual film confirmed by EDX.

[0098] : No residual film confirmed by eye, but a slight residual film confirmed by EDX.

[0099] : Residual film confirmed by eye.

[0100] Results are shown in Table 1. In tests 7-9, 12-14, and 17-19, in which the hardness (Rockwell hardness) of the jetting media relative to base material A was in a range of R15 to R125 or M20 to M125, and adhered object removal was performed at a collision energy of 1.410.sup.7 J to 5.410.sup.4 J, each evaluation result was a , and it was shown that adhered objects could be favorably removed. Note that of the test results shown in FIG. 1, those for which the Base Material Loss Evaluation or Adhered Object Removal Evaluation has an are not from the embodiment of the invention.

[0101] Tests 1-6, 10, 11, 15, 16, and 20-25, in which the jetting media hardness and/or collision energy is outside the range above, were evaluations in which at least one of the Base Material Loss Evaluation or the Adhered Object Removal Evaluation was a or an . Of these, from a practical standpoint, a evaluation means there is a non-problematic decline in attributes, but a decline in workpiece attributes was observed compared to work performed within the above-noted range of jetting media hardness and collision energies.

[0102] A coating was similarly removed under test 25 conditions and the worked surface of the virtual jig observed by SEM. For comparison, the worked surfaces of the virtual jig were observed by SEM after being treated in test 13 and test 21. Results thereof are as follows:

[0103] Test 13: Attributes as shown in the left diagram in FIG. 5; removal accomplished by separation starting at the crystal grain boundary.

[0104] Test 21: Attributes as shown in the left diagram in FIG. 5; removal accomplished by separation starting at the crystal grain boundary. However, traces of partial surface roughening on the surface were observed, and this is assumed to have caused the degradation in workpiece attributes.

[0105] Test 25: Attributes as shown in the right diagram in FIG. 5, wherein the film was cut away and removed.

[0106] In tests 26 and 27, in which the jetting media hardness relative to base material B was or less that of the base material B, and adhered object removal was performed at a collision energy in a range of 1.010.sup.9 J to 1.010.sup.8 J, each evaluation result was a , and it was shown that adhered objects could be favorably removed.

[0107] Using these ceramic particles as the jetting media, in tests 28 and 29, where the collision energy was outside the above range, at least one of the Base Material Loss or Film Removal evaluations was either a or an . Of these, from a practical standpoint, a evaluation means there is a non-problematic decline in attributes, but compared to work performed within the above range of jetting media hardness and collision energy, a decline in workpiece attributes was observed.

[0108] Using a resin material as a low rigidity jetting media in test 30, in which adhered objects were removed within the above collision energy range, the Base Material Evaluation was a , but the film removal evaluation was an . We assume this is because jetting media rigidity was low, so even though jetting media collided, it was not possible to form fracture starting points at the crystal grain boundary. In test 31, in which, using the same jetting media, the collision energy was increased to remove adhered objects, the Base Material Loss evaluation was an . It was confirmed that the cause for this was defects present in the mother material causing fracturing of the coating layer, and furthermore that the base material itself was damaged, with these defects acting as starting points.

[0109] The above results suggest the following:

[0110] (1) To reduce damage to the base material (jig) and remove adhered objects, it is good to peel off the adhered objects starting from the crystal grain boundary.

[0111] (2) For removing adhered objects efficiently, the balance between the hardness of jetting media relative to the jig, and the collision energy when jetting media collides with the jig, is important.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Result Condition Base Base Collision Material Film Material Hardness Energy (J) Loss Removal Test 1 A HRR85 3.0 10.sup.8 x Test 2 A HRR85 4.7 10.sup.7 Test 3 A HRR85 7.9 10.sup.6 Test 4 A HRR85 1.2 10.sup.4 Test 5 A HRR85 1.9 10.sup.4 x Test 6 A HRR110 9.3 10.sup.8 x Test 7 A HRR110 1.4 10.sup.7 Test 8 A HRR110 5.7 10.sup.6 Test 9 A HRR110 5.4 10.sup.4 Test 10 A HRR110 8.4 10.sup.4 x Test 11 A HRM100 9.3 10.sup.8 Test 12 A HRM100 1.4 10.sup.7 Test 13 A HRM100 5.7 10.sup.6 Test 14 A HRM100 5.4 10.sup.4 Test 15 A HRM100 8.4 10.sup.4 Test 16 A HRM125 9.3 10.sup.8 Test 17 A HRM125 1.4 10.sup.7 Test 18 A HRM125 5.7 10.sup.6 Test 19 A HRM125 5.4 10.sup.4 Test 20 A HRM125 8.4 10.sup.4 x Test 21 A Hv500 4.3 10.sup.8 Test 22 A Hv500 1.6 10.sup.7 x Test 23 A Hv500 5.9 10.sup.6 x Test 24 A Hv500 5.3 10.sup.4 x Test 25 A Hv500 8.9 10.sup.4 x Test 26 B Hv1050 1.2 10.sup.9 Test 27 B Hv1050 9.7 10.sup.9 Test 28 B Hv1050 .sup.9.0 10.sup.10 Test 29 B Hv1050 3.0 10.sup.8 Test 30 B HRR85 9.7 10.sup.9 x Test 31 B HRR85 7.9 10.sup.6 x

[0112] In the first embodiment we explained removal of a film adhered to a surface in which quartz and SiC-coated carbon was selected as the jig-equivalent base material, but the jig material is not limited to these.

[0113] Next we explain an adhered object removal method in a second embodiment of the invention.

[0114] In the adhered object removal method of this embodiment, the jetting media used to remove adhered objects differs from the above-described first embodiment.

[0115] In this embodiment we used a jetting media softer than the jig, so that adhered objects could be efficiently removed while minimizing damage to the jig when the jetting media collides with the jig. At this point the hardness of the jetting media may be or less the hardness of the jig. In addition, a material not containing any metal component was used so that no metal component originating in the jetting media would be left on the jig. The injection material may be selected as appropriate to match jig hardness from ceramic (alumina, silicon carbide, zircon, etc.), resin (urea resin, nylon, acrylic resin, phenol resin, etc.), glass, plant seed (walnut shell, peach pit, apricot pit, etc.), or sodium bicarbonate, dry ice, or the like. Of these, resin permits easy adjustment of shape and grain size and can be manufactured at low cost, so is particularly preferred for use. When selecting a resin, at least the outside surface should be resin. That is, the entirety may be composed of resin, or particles may have resin positioned on the outer shell of a high specific gravity grain as nucleus.

[0116] There is no particular limitation on the shape of the jetting media. Adhered material removal efficiency increases when jetting media grains have corners, but there is a risk that components adhering to the surface of the jetting media arising from contact with the processing apparatus 01 will more easily adhere. There are many opportunities for the jetting media to contact the enclosure 10, so there is a possibility that a very tiny amount of an apparatus-origin metal component will adhere to the surface of the jetting media. Therefore to more fully eliminate residual metal components, the jetting media grains may also be formed with rounded convex curved lines on the corners. In such shapes, the collision force is dispersed when colliding with the jig, thus reducing damage to the jig. Forming with a convex curved line can be accomplished with a spherical shape, or by rounding the corner portions of a polygonal shape or an anisotropic shape.

[0117] If the grain size of the jetting media is too small, adhered objects cannot be removed; if too large there is damage to the jig. In the present embodiment we adopted an average grain size d50 of 50-400 m. When such jetting media is used, fracture starting points are formed at the crystal grain boundary at the start of collision by the jetting media collision energy. Further collisions by the jetting media cause crystal grains to peel off at those starting points.

[0118] Next, we explain results of removing adhered objects from the workpiece by the adhered object removal method of a second embodiment of the invention.

[0119] As a jig-equivalent base material, taking into account the actual jig usage environment, we prepared a quartz plate (2 inches1.0 mm thick; Vickers hardness HV714-918); this was held at 1000 C. for 10 minutes, then cooled to room temperature; this cycle was repeated 200 times.

[0120] The nozzle was arranged so the distance between the nozzle and the workpiece was 100 mm, and the angle of the jetting flow relative to the workpiece is 90. Jetting media was then jetted for 5 minutes to a fixed point on the workpiece. The following were used as jetting media:

[0121] Jetting media A: Urea resin (Rockwell hardness HRM=15; polygonal)

[0122] Jetting media B: Nylon resin (Rockwell hardness HRR=110; cylindrical)

[0123] Jetting media C: Acrylic resin (Rockwell hardness HRM=95; spherical)

[0124] Jetting media D: Phenol resin (Rockwell hardness HRM=125; spherical)

[0125] Jetting media E: Glass (Vickers hardness HV=500; spherical)

[0126] Jetting media F: Walnuts (Mohs hardness=2; polygonal)

[0127] Jetting media G: White fused alumina (Vickers hardness HV=2200; polygonal)

[0128] Jetting media H: Grain on which a white fused alumina grain is supported on the outer edge of urethane rubber (Shore A hardness=40; columnar)

[0129] Jetting media I: Stainless steel (Vickers hardness Hv=187; spherical)

[0130] After working, the cutting depth (loss) on the quartz plate was confirmed using an integrated surface roughness/profilometer. Evaluation criteria were the same as in the first embodiment.

[0131] For conditions in which the Base Material Loss Evaluation result was either a or a , further removal of adhered objects was performed. A film-forming operation was repeated 10 times using the MOCVD method to form a 50 m thick GaN film on the quartz plate to which the preceding processing had been applied.

[0132] In the same manner as described above, adhered objects (film) were removed by jetting with jetting media for 5 minutes to a fixed point relative to the quartz plate on which a film was formed.

[0133] After working, removal of the adhered objects was confirmed by microscope observation and by EDX analysis. Adhered object removal evaluation criteria were the same as in the first embodiment.

[0134] Results are shown in Table 2.

Base Material Wear Evaluation

[0135] Tests 32-42, 44, and 45, in which the jetting media hardness was lower than the quartz plate, were evaluations in which at the base material wear evaluation was a or a . evaluations mean there is no problem for practical use, or that a evaluation could be achieved by optimizing processing conditions. On the other hand in tests such as 43, which uses a jetting media with a higher jetting media hardness than quartz plate, the base material wear evaluation was an , even when the jetting media collision energy was excessively lowered. Note that test 43 is not an embodiment of the invention. It was thus shown that damage to the base material can be minimized by using jetting media with a lower hardness than the jig.

[0136] When tests 32, 38, and 39 were compared in order to investigate the effect of jetting media shape on damage to the base material, a was assigned for all qualitative evaluations, but the deepest cutting remained in test 39, which used a spherical jetting media. It was therefore shown that damage to the base material can be minimized by using a jetting media on which convex curved surfaces are formed over the entire grain.

Evaluation of Adhered Object Removal

[0137] The results of removing the coating under the conditions of tests 32-42 and 44-45, in which the base material loss evaluation was a or a , were in all cases a or a . evaluations mean there is no problem for practical use, or that a evaluation could be achieved by optimizing processing conditions. Tests 32-42 and 44-45 fall within the jetting media collision energy range of 1.010.sup.6 J to 1.010.sup.4 J. Therefore it was shown that under these conditions the coating can be sufficiently peeled off.

Metal Component Residue Evaluation

[0138] After removing adhered objects from an actual jig (quartz) under test conditions 38, 44, and 45, a GaN coating was formed on a substrate by the MOCVD method on a substrate using that jig. After forming the coating, the component depth was analyzed in the GaN coating depth direction by TOF-SIMS. As a result, no metal component was detected for test 38, Al was detected in test 44, and Fe was detected in test 45. It appears the detected Al originates in the alumina supported on the outer edge of the urethane rubber, and the Fe originates in stainless steel. That is, the jetting media metal component appears to remain on the jig, and penetrates into the GaN coating. For example, when an LED light emitting-element is formed using MOCVD, the metal component remaining on the jig leads to reduced performance of the deposited film, such as reduced light emitting efficiency. Therefore parts containing a metal component in the jetting media are not well suited for such purposes.

[0139] The above results suggest the following:

[0140] (1) To remove adhered objects with reduced damage to the base material (jig), it is desirable to use jetting media with a lower hardness than the jig, and not containing a metal component.

[0141] (2) For removing adhered objects efficiently, the balance between the hardness of jetting media relative to the jig and the collision energy when jetting media collides with the jig is important.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Condition Result Collision Base Adhered Jetting Grain Energy Material Object No. Media size(m) (J) Damage Removal Test 32 A 380 5.37 10.sup.5 Test 33 A 380 9.07 10.sup.5 Test 34 A 380 1.37 10.sup.4 Test 35 A 250 1.53 10.sup.5 Test 36 A 180 5.71 10.sup.6 Test 37 A 125 1.91 10.sup.6 Test 38 B 400 4.73 10.sup.5 Test 39 C 300 2.09 10.sup.5 Test 40 D 300 8.01 10.sup.5 Test 41 E 77 1.87 10.sup.6 Test 42 F 300 5.79 10.sup.5 Test 43 G 30 6.89 10.sup.8 x not tested Test 44 H 300 2.12 10.sup.5 Test 45 I 275 1.08 10.sup.4

[0142] In one embodiment we explained that quartz was selected as the jig-equivalent base material and a coating adhered to the surface thereof was removed, but the jig material is not limited to quartz.

[0143] In one embodiment we explained the removal of adhered objects from a jig used when depositing film by the MOCVD method, but adhered objects can be removed from jigs used in film deposition processes for all types of crystal growth, including physical vapor phase deposition methods (PVD) such as vacuum deposition and sputtering, and chemical vapor phase deposition methods (CVD) such as CVD and plasma CVD.

[0144] In one embodiment we explained the film deposition process in the context of the process for manufacturing a semiconductor device, but the method may be applied to removal of adhered objects from jigs used in film deposition processes using thin film crystal growth for other manufacturing processes, such as the manufacture of fixtures and tools.

EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

[0145] 01: processing apparatus

[0146] 10: enclosure

[0147] 11: door

[0148] 12: nozzle affixing jig

[0149] 13: processing table

[0150] 14: transport mechanism

[0151] 15: stand

[0152] 20: volumetric supply mechanism

[0153] 30: separator mechanism

[0154] 31: storage hopper

[0155] 40: suction mechanism

[0156] 50: nozzle

[0157] 60: control mechanism

[0158] A: jetting area

[0159] H1: air hose

[0160] H2: jetting media hose

[0161] R: processing chamber

[0162] T: sweep trajectory

[0163] W: workpiece