Systems and methods for detecting tremors

Abstract

In one embodiment, a method for detecting tremors includes generating electromagnetic fields proximate to an individual's body part with a circuit to generate an eddy current density on a surface of the body part, receiving magnetic fields generated by the eddy current with the circuit that change a resonant frequency of the circuit, sensing the resonant frequency as it changes over time, and determining a movement frequency of the body part from the resonant frequency to quantify tremors in the body part.

Claims

1. A contactless method for detecting tremors using a tremor detection system, the method comprising: generating electromagnetic fields proximate to an individual's body part with a circuit of the system to generate an eddy current density on a surface of the body part, wherein the eddy current density is generated on the surface without any component of the system contacting the body part; receiving magnetic fields generated by the eddy current with the circuit that change a resonant frequency of the circuit; sensing the resonant frequency as it changes over time; and determining a movement frequency of the body part from the resonant frequency to quantify tremors in the body part.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein generating electromagnetic fields comprises generating electromagnetic fields with an oscillator circuit.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating electromagnetic fields with an oscillator circuit comprises generating electromagnetic fields with a sensing coil of the oscillator circuit.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving magnetic fields comprises receiving the magnetic fields with a sensing coil of the circuit.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein sensing the resonant frequency comprises sensing the resonant frequency with a frequency counter of the circuit.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising converting the resonant frequency changes into digital counter data with the frequency counter.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising providing the digital counter data to a microprocessor of the circuit and transmitting the digital counter data to a separate computing device with the microprocessor.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a movement frequency of the body part comprises determining a distance of the body part from the sensing coil as a function of time from the changing resonant frequency.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein determining a distance comprises correlating the resonant frequency to a distance using an algorithm.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the algorithm is executed by a computing device in communication with the circuit.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the algorithm correlates the resonant frequency to the distance with reference to a correlation graph or table.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein determining a movement frequency further comprises converting the distance into a movement frequency.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein converting the distance into a movement frequency comprises performing a Fourier transform on the distance.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.

(2) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a system for detecting tremors.

(3) FIG. 2 is an equivalent circuit diagram of an oscillation circuit shown in FIG. 1.

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a simulation model of the oscillation circuit shown in FIG. 1.

(5) FIG. 4 is a graph that shows resonant frequencies at various distances, D, between a hand and a sensing coil of a tremor detector.

(6) FIG. 5 is a graph that identifies distance as a function of the resonant frequency of an oscillation circuit of a tremor detectors.

(7) FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a testing apparatus used to manipulate a wooden hand.

(8) FIG. 7A is a graph that shows distance as a function of time when the wooden hand of FIG. 6 was actuated at 5 Hz.

(9) FIG. 7B is a graph that shows the spectral distribution of the distances of FIG. 7A.

(10) FIG. 8A is a graph that shows tremor acceleration at x axis as a function of time when the wooden hand was actuated at 5 Hz.

(11) FIG. 8B is a graph that shows spectral distributions of the accelerations of FIG. 8A.

(12) FIG. 9A is a graph that shows tremor acceleration at y axis as a function of time when the wooden hand was actuated at 5 Hz.

(13) FIG. 9B is a graph that shows spectral distributions of the accelerations of FIG. 9A.

(14) FIG. 10A is a graph that shows tremor acceleration at z axis as a function of time when the wooden hand was actuated at 5 Hz.

(15) FIG. 10B is a graph that shows spectral distributions of the accelerations of FIG. 10A.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(16) As described above, it would be desirable to have a system and method for accurately detecting tremors. Disclosed herein are examples of such systems and methods. In some embodiments, a tremor detection system comprises a contactless tremor detector that includes an oscillator circuit. The oscillator circuit includes a sensing coil next to which a patient can place his or her hand (or other body part). The oscillator circuit generates alternating electromagnetic fields that generate an eddy current density on the surface of the user's hand. The magnetic fields generated by the eddy current couple back to the sensing coil and change the resonant frequency of the circuit. The changing resonant frequency can then be used to determine the distance of the hand from the coil as a function of time, which can then be converted into a frequency that can provide an indication of the presence of tremor.

(17) In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.

(18) FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a tremor detection system 10. As shown in this figure, the system 10 generally comprises a contactless tremor detector 12 and a computing device 14 that is in electrical communication with the detector. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the tremor detector 12 includes an oscillator circuit 16 having a sensing coil 18, an oscillator 22 connected to the coil, and a frequency counter 24 connected to the oscillator. The sensing coil 18 can comprise a spiral coil of conductive wire, such as copper wire. By way of example, the spiral coil can comprise approximately 50 turns of wire, an outer diameter of approximately 12 cm, and a measured inductance of approximately 110 μH.

(19) In some embodiments, the oscillator 22 and the frequency counter 24 can be implemented as an integrated inductive sensor, such as an inductive sensing chip, which can be controlled by the microcontroller 26. In such cases, the inductive sensing chip can sense inductance and convert it into a digital signal that can be transmitted to the computing device 14 by the microcontroller 26. By way of example, the inductive sensing chip can comprise an LDC1000 and the microcontroller 26 can comprise an MSP430F5529, both of which are produced by Texas Instruments, Inc. In some embodiments, the oscillator circuit 16 can have a total capacitance of approximately 93 pF.

(20) With further reference to FIG. 1, the computing device 14 comprises a processing device 28 and memory 30 (a non-transitory computer-readable medium) that stores a tremor evaluation program 32 (i.e., logic and/or computer-implementable instructions) that can receive the frequency counter data from the microcontroller 26 and generate information for an end user (e.g., physician) that can be used to diagnose a patient condition.

(21) As shown in FIG. 1, a patient (or other user) can place his or her hand (or other body part to be evaluated) in proximity to the sensing coil 18 when an evaluation is to be performed. During operation of the system 10, the oscillator 22 generates oscillating electromagnetic fields that generate an eddy current density on the surface of a patient's hand when it is placed in proximity to the sensing coil 18. The magnetic fields generated by the eddy current are then coupled back to the sensing coil 18 and produce a difference current that changes the resonant frequency of the oscillator circuit 16. Generally speaking, the resonant frequency of the oscillator circuit 16 increases when the hand is brought closer to the sensing coil 18 and decreases when the hand is moved away from the coil. The resonant frequency changes are sensed by the frequency counter 24 and converted into digital frequency counter data that is provided to the microcontroller 26, which transmits them to the computing device 14.

(22) In some embodiments, computing device 14 can correlate the frequency counter data into distances that vary with time. By way of example, the frequency counter data can be correlated to distances by an algorithm of the tremor evaluation program 32 using a correlation graph or table that is constructed during a calibration process in which the resonant frequency of the oscillation circuit 16 is measured as an object is placed distances from the sensing coil 18. FIG. 5 shows an example graph that correlates resonant frequency with distance. Through this process, the distance of the hand from the sensing coil 18 can be determined as a function of time (a temporal domain signal). This distance data in the temporal domain can then be converted into frequency data in the frequency domain that provide an indication of the frequency of any movement of the hand and, therefore, the frequency of any tremors that are being produced. In some embodiments, the distance data can be converted into frequency data by an algorithm of the tremor evaluation program 32 by performing a Fourier transform. FIG. 7B shows an example graph of hand movement frequencies obtained in this manner from distance data shown in FIG. 7A. The movement frequency data can then be evaluated by a physician for the purposes of diagnosing a condition of the patient. In particular, the physician can identify the frequency band that has the greatest amount of signal (power density). If this band falls within a frequency band associated with a particular condition, such as Parkinson's disease, the presence of the condition is indicated.

(23) FIG. 2 shows an equivalent circuit diagram for the oscillator circuit 16 shown in FIG. 1. In FIG. 2, L1 is the inductance of the sensing coil 18, C1 is the tuning capacitance of the coil, and R1 is the resistance of the coil. L2 is the inductance induced by the hand and R2 is the hand surface resistance. When the oscillator circuit 16 generates an alternating electromagnetic field, the eddy current density, J, is generated by the magnetic field on the hand. A magnetic field induced by the eddy current is then coupled back to the coil and produces a current, which changes the resonant frequency.

(24) FIG. 3 shows a simulation model for the oscillation circuit 16. The equivalent impendence can be expressed as

(25) $\begin{array}{cc}Z=\frac{\frac{R_1}{{\omega }^2{C}_1^2}+j\left(\frac{L}{\omega C_1^2}-\frac{R_1^2}{\omega C_1}-\frac{\omega L^2}{C_1}\right)}{R\frac{2}{1}+{\left(\omega L-\frac{1}{\omega C_1}\right)}^2}\mathrm{where}L=L_1-L_2\frac{{\omega }^2{M}^2}{R\frac{2}{2}+{\omega }^2{L}_2^2},& \left(1\right)\end{array}$
ω is oscillator frequency, and M is the mutual inductance between the sensor coil and the human hand. In the simulation, C1=93 pF, L1=110 μH, and R1=0.165Ω. According to the IEEE Standard 80, the internal resistance of the body is approximately as 300Ω. An assumption was made that the internal resistance of human hand is R2=50Ω and the inductance of the human hand is L2=20 μH. The working range between the hand and the detector was 3.5 to 10 cm.

(26) By the Bio-Savart law, the mutual inductance M is proportional to 1/D.sup.3 where D is the distance. When the mutual inductance increases, the resonant frequency in the inductive circuit increases. The impedance of the equivalent circuit is shown in FIG. 4.

(27) The relationship between the distance and the resonant frequency is shown in FIG. 5. With the detected resonant frequency, the distance can be obtained. Through continuous counting of the resonant frequencies, the small variations between the coil and the hand can be dynamically obtained.

(28) Experimental apparatus was designed to verify the theory. As shown in FIG. 6, the apparatus consisted of a wooden hand wrapped in cooper foil to emulate a human hand as it is difficult to control the tremor frequency and magnitude of a real human hand. A solenoid actuator with a power requirement of 12 V and 1 A was used to actuate the wooden hand with a MOSFET (AO3414, 20 V, 4.2 A, N-Channel) to drive the actuator. An MSP430 microcontroller and a 12 V power supply were used for control. To mimic the movement of a real hand, the finger joints on the wooden hand model were loosened and were free to move when the hand is driven by the actuator. The swing magnitude of the wooden hand was approximately 2 cm. The wooden hand was placed in front of the sensing coil. Various actuation signals were tested.

(29) When the wooden hand was placed 5 cm away from the sensing coil and the microcontroller produced 5 Hz signals to drive the wooden hand, continuous frequency counts at 10,000 samples/s and 24-bit resolution were acquired by the tremor detector. The frequencies were converted to a temporal plot in term of distance shown in FIG. 7A. The spectral distribution is shown in FIG. 7B. The motions from fingers contributed the spreading of the spectral distribution.

(30) A triaxial accelerometer, which was configured on an eZ430-Chronos wireless wearable device (Texas Instruments, Inc.), was used to record the tremor accelerations of the wooden hand for purposes of comparison. The wearable device included a triaxial accelerometer (Bosch Sensortec BMA250), an RF transceiver (CC1101), and a microcontroller (MSP430F5509). The digital resolution of the triaxial accelerometer was 10 bits with a measurement range of ±16 g, a sensitivity of 16 LSB/g, and a zero-g offset of ±80 mg. The accelerometer sample rate was 33 samples/s for each axis.

(31) The device was attached on the palm of wooden hand. Accelerations of the hand were recorded when the hand was driven by the 5 Hz signal. Three sets of acceleration data are shown in FIGS. 8, 9, and 10. Comparing the spectral distributions in FIGS. 8B, 9B, and 10B with the one measured by the tremor detector, shown in FIG. 7B, only the signals from two axes can indicate the tremor signals. However, it is obvious that more harmonic elements were recorded. The temporal waveforms also showed distortion even though the hand model was moved with a single driving frequency. One reason for this is the low sample rate of the wearable device. However the main problem was that the accelerometers are designed to detect acceleration of an object, while the disclosed tremor detector detects the distance variations. This comparison demonstrates that the disclosed tremor sensor is better suited for detecting hand tremors when the subject consciously maintains his or her arm still such that the acceleration is not significant enough to be accurately detected.

(32) The disclosed systems and methods can be used to quantify tremors associated with various diseases, such as fundamental tremors, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, chronic kidney disease, and neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, tremors associated with other conditions or circumstances, such as anxiety, fear, fatigue from exercise, or the use or withdraw of drugs (such as amphetamines, cocaine, caffeine, corticosteroids, SSRI) and alcohol, can be detected. While the systems and methods have been described as being used to quantify hand tremors, it is noted that any body tremors can be measured using the systems and methods.