SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY BY MEASUREMENTS OF AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYTEM ACTIVITY
20180333065 ยท 2018-11-22
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61B5/0205
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A system and method for assessing a patient includes a portable device for measuring a plurality of autonomic nervous system activities so as to form a baseline profile in a processor connected to the device. The baseline profile corresponds to an initial patient status before an impact event. A biomarker profile is determined by a parasympathetic ANS measurement and parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement based on the baseline profile and a projected patient status for a traumatic brain injury. The device measures the plurality of autonomic nervous system activities after an impact event so as to form a test profile. The test profile is compared to the biomarker profile in a memory of the processor so as to form an injury index. When the injury index is equal or greater than a predetermined level, a traumatic brain injury is detected. An interactive display can indicate the traumatic brain injury.
Claims
1. A method for assessing a patient, the method comprising the steps of: measuring a plurality of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activities so as to form a baseline profile, said baseline profile corresponding to an initial patient status before an impact event; determining a biomarker profile based on said baseline profile, said biomarker profile corresponding to a projected patient status for a traumatic brain injury; measuring said plurality of autonomic nervous system activities so as to form a test profile, said test profile corresponding to an injured patient status after said impact event; comparing said test profile to said biomarker profile so as to form an injury index based on matches between said test profile and said biomarker profile; and detecting a traumatic brain injury when said injury index corresponds to a predetermined level.
2. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of autonomic nervous system activities is comprised of at least one of a group consisting of pulse rate variability, pulse wave changes, cardiac output, blood pressure changes, bioimpedance, and sweat loss.
3. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 1, wherein said biomarker profile is comprised of a parasympathetic ANS measurement and a blended parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement.
4. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 3, wherein said parasympathetic ANS measurement is the standard deviation of normal to normal intervals (SDNN).
5. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 4, wherein said blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is low frequency fraction (LF).
6. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 4, wherein said blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is ratio of low frequency to high frequency fraction (LF/HF).
7. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 1, wherein said biomarker profile is comprised of a parasympathetic ANS measurement, a first blended parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement, and a second blended parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement.
8. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 7, wherein said parasympathetic ANS measurement is the standard deviation of normal to normal intervals (SDNN), wherein said first blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is low frequency fraction (LF), and wherein said second blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is ratio of low frequency to high frequency fraction (LF/HF).
9. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 4, wherein the step of detecting comprises said SDNN of said injury index being greater than said predetermined level.
10. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 9, wherein said blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is low frequency fraction (LF), and wherein the step of detecting comprises said LF of said injury index being less than said predetermined level.
11. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 9, wherein said blended parasympathetic ANS measurement is ratio of low frequency to high frequency fraction (LF/HF), and wherein the step of detecting comprises said LF/HF of said injury index being less than said predetermined level.
12. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 3, wherein said biomarker profile is further comprised of at least one of a group consisting of high frequency (HF) pulse rate variability and the root mean squared difference between adjacent N-N intervals (RMSSD).
13. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 3, wherein said biomarker profile is further comprised of at least one of a group consisting of pulse wave changes, cardiac output, blood pressure changes, bioimpedance, and sweat loss.
14. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 13, wherein said pulse wave changes is comprised of at least one of a group consisting of pulse wave velocity (SI or PWV), augmentation index (Aix or AI), stroke volume (SV), systolic pre-ejection period (PEP), left ventricle ejection time (LVET), the PEP/LVET ratio, the left ventricle ejection power (b/a) and the systolic time.
15. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of: determining a severity profile based on said biomarker profile, said severity profile corresponding to a plurality of levels of seriousness of said traumatic brain injury; comparing said injury index to said severity profile; and matching said injury index to at least one level of seriousness of said traumatic brain injury of said severity profile.
16. The method for assessing a patient, according to claim 15, wherein the step of measuring said plurality of autonomic nervous system activities is comprised of: performing a Valsalva test so as to determine a Valsalva result, said baseline profile being comprised of said Valsalva result, wherein said biomarker profile is comprised of said Valsalva result, wherein said severity profile is comprised of said Valsalva result, and wherein the step of measuring said plurality of autonomic nervous system activities is comprised of: performing a K30/15 standing step test so as to determine a K30/15 standing step result, said Valsalva result being being comprised of said K30/15 standing step result.
17. A system for assessing a patient, comprising: a processor; a memory being comprised of a computer program code for one or more programs; and a portable measuring device for a plurality of autonomic nervous system activities, said portable measuring device being connected to said processor, wherein said processor forms said baseline profile, said biomarker profile, said test profile, and said injury index, according to claim 1, and wherein said predetermined level is stored in said memory,
18. The system for assessing a patient, according to claim 17, wherein said portable measuring device is connected to said processor by a wireless network.
19. The system for assessing a patient, according to claim 17, wherein said portable measuring device is powered by a battery.
20. The system for assessing a patient, according to claim 17, further comprising: an interactive display connected to said processor, said baseline profile, said biomarker profile, said test profile, and said injury index being visible on said interactive display, wherein said processor detects a traumatic brain injury when said injury index corresponds to a predetermined level, said interactive display indicating whether said traumatic brain injury is detected.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036]
[0037]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0038]
[0039]
[0040] The system 10 is portable, even when a mobile device 50 is incorporated into the system 10, and the system 10 can be powered by batteries. A power source can be mobile and portable without requiring a wall socket in a medical facility. The system 10 is more versatile to be compatible with ANS measurements for brain activity without the EEG equipment. In the embodiments with the mobile devices 50, there can be an interactive display connected to the processor 20 through the mobile device 50 so that a baseline profile, a biomarker profile, a test profile, and an injury index can be visible to a doctor or patient. When a TBI is detected, the interactive display can show the diagnosis and provide a warning. If a patient is a player in an athletic contest, the patient can be removed from the field of play when the interactive display indicates that a TBI was detected.
[0041] The memory 30 can also be associated with the mobile device 50, when the processor 20 is also associated with the mobile device 50. When there is no readily available access to a wireless network, it may be necessary to have a mobile device 50 with the capacity to act as the processor 20, such as a corresponding memory in the mobile device 50. The predetermined levels of the injury index can also be stored in the memory 30 of either location in the mobile device 60 or the processor 20.
[0042] Embodiments of the present invention include the method for assessing a patient with the system 10 of
[0043] The baseline profile corresponds to an initial patient status before an impact event. The baseline profile is created by measurements of ANS before a practice or competition for each athlete. The biomarker profile corresponds to a projected patient status for a traumatic brain injury. The biomarker profile is based on autonomic nervous system changes, if the patient was injured. Only particular changes to the autonomic nervous system can be used to form the biomarker profile of the present invention. The biomarker profile sets the amount, number, and combination of changes to the autonomic nervous system to accurately characterize a traumatic brain injury for a particular patient. Although heart rate is a measurement for other ANS measurements and although heart rate is already known to be measured after a potential injury, there is no biomarker profile generated from heart rate measurements to screen for TBI or a concussion as in the present invention. A TBI or concussion cannot be diagnosed by simply taking the heart rate of a patient.
[0044] Test data supports the efficacy of a biomarker profile of the present invention. Prior art indicates that there are changes in the ANS related to TBI, such as arterial stiffness and stroke volume, heart rate variability, and sympathovagal balance, but there is a wide range of ANS measurements. The ANS covers both sympathetic (fight or flight) responses and parasympathetic (regulation of the body's unconscious actions) responses, so there is only a general disclosure of ANS being affected by TBI and concussions. Because changes in ANS may result from other stimuli besides TBI, there is no knowledge for distinguishing these other changes in ANS and the changes in ANS indicating TBI. The present invention now identifies the biomarker profile of ANS measurements for reliably detecting TBI.
[0045] In a preliminary study, pulse oximeter data for pulse wave (PW) analysis and other autonomic nervous system (ANS) measurements were used in a small study to compare six healthy patients ages 14 to 71 with two patients ages 14 and 15 that had confirmed concussions. Due to the differences in age between the healthy control group and the younger concussed patients and the high correlation between age and pulse wave analysis, not all results were comparable between No TBI and Confirmed TBI in this small sample group. Although preliminary, the results show trends that appear to be significant. Further study in a controlled athletic environment can further support the present disclosures, with more control for age and the TBI events.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 6 Patients, 2 Patients Ages 14-71 Ages 14 & 15 No TBI Confirmed TBI Reference Average Average ANS Measurements Value Values Values p = SDNN, Parasym- >40 ms 48 74 0.02 * pathetic RMSSD, Parasym- 35-65 ms 55 73 0.07.sup. pathetic Low Frequency 22-46% 49 26 0.03 * (LF) - Sympathetic High Frequency 22-34% 30 37 0.08.sup. (HF) - Parasym- pathetic LF/HF Sym/Para <2.0 1.7 0.7 0.04 * balance * Significant Result with p < 0.05
[0046] In Table 1, the present invention identifies particular biomarkers for the biomarker profile. The standard deviation of normal to normal intervals (SDNN) is an ANS measurement of pulse rate variability. SDNN is a measure of parasympathetic activity. The low frequency fraction (LF) is another ANS measurement of pulse rate variability. LF is a measure of both parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. The ratio of low frequency to high frequency (LF/HF) is another ANS measurement of pulse rate variability. LF/HF also measures parasympathetic and sympathetic activity as a balance of sympathetic to parasympathetic balance.
[0047] The ANS impairment in sympathetic sudomotor function has been observed, and Table 1 confirms this sympathetic impairment in the lower LF sympathetic measurement and the LF/HF balance results. However, the SDNN results shows that the parasympathetic activity increased. These distinctions between different ANS measurement are the first preliminary results showing an impairment in the sympathetic autonomic nervous system and a positive parasympathetic reaction to a TBI or concussion.
[0048] Table 1 shows that among several ANS measurements, SDNN, LF, and LF/HF, were determined to be significant with p<0.05. The present invention includes a biomarker profile comprised of a parasympathetic ANS measurement and parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement. In particular, the biomarker profile is comprised of a higher SDNN and either lower LF or LF/HF measurements. In another embodiment, the biomarker profile is comprised of higher SDNN, lower LF, and lower LF/HF measurements.
[0049] Embodiments of the present invention can also include a biomarker profile comprised of other ANS measurements. Table 1 also shows increases at a lower statistical significance level, including high frequency (HF) pulse rate variability, a marker of parasympathetic activity and the root mean squared difference between adjacent N-N intervals (RMSSD), as a measure of parasympathetic activity. These ANS measurements of parasympathetic activity (RMSSD and HF) are less significant than the SDNN. The unconscious positive ANS reaction to a concussion cannot be measured by all parasympathetic activity ANS measurements yet. Further investigation may reveal how to incorporate HF and RMSSD into a biomarker profile. If more robust differences can be isolated, then these other ANS measurements on the parasympathetic activity side may also be used to contribute to a more precise biomarker profile.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Following Assays Are Not Significant Due to the Lower Age of TBI Patients 6 Patients, 2 Patients Ages 14-71 Ages 14 & 15 Pulse Wave Analysis No TBI Confirmed TBI SI, Pulse Wave Velocity <11 m/sec 8.5 5.9 Aix, Augmentation Index <1.4 1.3 1.0 PEP, Systolic Pre- <110 ms 124 124 ejection Peroid LVET, Left Ventricle >300 ms 338 436 Ejection Time PEP/LVET <0.4 0.4 0.3 b/a, Left Ventricle ?0.82 to ?0.46 ?0.9 ?1.2 Ejection Power Systolic Time 200-500 ms 276 339 spO2% >95% 97 99
[0050] Table 2 shows the pulse wave analysis for No TBI and Confirmed TBI. There are large differences in the pulse wave velocity (SI) and augmentation index (Aix) between the concussed patients and the control group but due to the large average age differences in these groups the results are discounted. It is expected that as a person ages that the SI and Aix values will increase due to stiffening of the arteries with age. This stiffening, due to atherosclerosis and loss of tissue flexibility, makes the reflected wave of the pulse wave return faster and increases the velocity of the pulse. Additionally, the augmentation (Aix) of the systolic wave generated by the reflected wave also increases with age. Although previously known to be significant in determining TBI or concussion in controlled pre and post-concussion testing in the prior art, the current preliminary study may be too small to confirm S1 and Aix as ANS measurements in the biomarker profile of the present invention.
[0051] Other ANS measurements in Table 2 include cardiac function as measured by systolic pre-ejection period (PEP), left ventricle ejection time (LVET), the PEP/LVET ratio, the left ventricle ejection power (b/a) and the systolic time. These measures of cardiac performance are also highly age dependent. So again, the current preliminary study may be too small to confirm these measurements in the biomarker profile of the present invention. Further investigation may be able to determine additional embodiments of the present invention for increasing precision based on pulse wave analysis of ANS measurements.
[0052] The test profile corresponds to an injured patient status after the impact event. Subsequent measurements of ANS, after the baseline profile is created, form the test profile. Various embodiments include the step of measuring the plurality of autonomic nervous system activities so as to form the test profile is within thirty minutes after an impact event, days after the impact event, immediately after the impact event, and at repeated time intervals for a series of test profiles. Each test profile can be used to track when the TBI was detectable after the impact event.
[0053] Embodiments of the present invention include the plurality of autonomic nervous system activities as pulse rate variability, pulse wave changes, cardiac output, blood pressure changes, bioimpedance, and sweat loss. Measurements of these activities are the measurements of ANS. The baseline profile, biomarker profile, test profile, injury index, and predetermined level all correspond to the selection of the particular measurements of ANS. The present invention can choose the amount, number, and combination of measurements of these activities to set the profiles, and consequently the injury index and predetermined level. The current embodiment includes the biomarker profile being comprised of a parasympathetic ANS measurement of pulse rate variability and blended parasympathetic and sympathetic ANS measurement of pulse rate variability. In particular, the biomarker profile can include SDNN and either LF or LF/HF measurements. In another embodiment, the biomarker profile is comprised of SDNN, LF, and LF/HF measurements.
[0054]
[0055] Still embodiments include cardiac output as ANS measurements incorporated into the biomarker profile.
[0056] In the present invention, the baseline profile is comprised of ANS measurements of pulse rate variability. There are changes in the pulse rate variability, but the present invention accomplishes more than merely recording the changes. It is already known to measure changes in activity. The present invention is a method that advances to screen or filter the changes so that only changes relevant to TBI are identified. The prior art of identifying general ANS differences changes after impact cannot determine whether those differences are related to brain damage of a concussion or TBI.
[0057] The present invention measures a particular combination for the most relevant and most accurate baseline profile, biomarker profile, and test profile. The injury index and predetermined levels demonstrate reliability in indicated a traumatic brain injury or concussion.
[0058] Various other factors can also contribute to the baseline profile, including Body mass index (BMI) in cm/kg, Body fat in percent, Blood oxygen level in percent saturation, Height to weight in ratio, and Basal metabolic rate in calories. Although not necessarily ANS measurements, these factors contribute to the efficacy of the injury index and predetermined level for a particular patient.
[0059] Still another embodiment of the method of the present invention is detecting severity of the TBI. In addition to confirming TBI, the method of the present invention can be used to determine the seriousness of the TBI. The method further includes determining a severity profile corresponding to a plurality of levels of seriousness of the traumatic brain injury. Similar to the biomarker profile, the severity profile sets the levels of seriousness. Once past a threshold, the amount of change of activity can be used to further characterize the TBI for guiding treatment decisions or patient observation. Based on the baseline profile, the severity profile is compared to the injury index. The injury index matches at least one level of seriousness of the traumatic brain injury. Thus, the TBI can be confirmed and characterized for more effective treatment protocols.
[0060] In the current embodiments of detecting severity, one of the activities for the steps of measuring is performing a Valsalva test so as to determine a Valsalva result or performing a K30/15 standing step test so as to determine a K30/15 standing step result. These two particular activities are particularly relevant to detecting severity, as such the baseline profile of this embodiment should include at least one of the Valsalva result and the K30/15 standing step result.
[0061] The present invention provides a system and method to detect a traumatic brain injury without an EEG and without relying on self-reported information from the patient. The present invention is more cost efficient and accessible than direct measurement of brain activity, and the detection is no longer reliant on verbal responses from the patient. Especially for serious injuries when the patient cannot speak, it is important to quick assess the patient.
[0062] The system and method measure autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, including before and after impacts suspected to cause a TBI or concussion. Although changes in ANS activity have already been observed after TBI, there has been no method to use those changes for any diagnosis. For example, taking a heart rate measurement and noticing a change in heart rate after an impact could happen for a variety of different physiological and psychological reasons. Similarly, taking a Valsalva test and noticing a change in a Valsalva result after an impact could also happen for a different variety of different physiological and psychological reasons. The present invention detects biomarkers of a traumatic brain injury in the autonomic nervous system. The changes in ANS activity are screened so that not just any changes to any ANS activity measurements detect a TBI. Prior art systems already measure some ANS activity, but these measurements are not used to form a biomarker profile, and test profiles are not created for comparison to the biomarker profile. The prior art literature identifying changes to ANS activity do not identify the amount, number, and combination of changes to reliably detect a TBI. The present invention provides the system and method to compare measurements of the autonomic nervous system before and after a potential traumatic brain injury.
[0063] Embodiments of the present invention can determine severity of a traumatic brain injury (TBI), in addition to confirming a TBI. Similar to the biomarker profile, there is no severity profile to define the levels of seriousness of a TBI according to measurements of ANS activities. The present invention further screens for the level of seriousness with the injury index of the test profile after an impact. The severity of a TBI can now be determined without an electroencephalographic measurement.
[0064] The system is portable so as to be available at athletic events on all levels, from youth to professional sports. A handheld device, such as a smartphone or tablet can be retrofit for compatibility with a device for measuring ANS activity. The smartphone with wireless connection to a service can become a system to detect a traumatic brain injury. A finger pulse oximeter plugged into a tablet can become a potentially life-saving diagnostic tool. The present invention enables known components to perform an innovative and beneficial method for detecting a TBI and determining severity of a TBI.
[0065] The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention is illustrative and explanatory thereof. Various changes in the details of the described method can be made without departing from the true spirit of the invention.