Titanium and magnesium compound for corrosion-resistant coatings
11584859 · 2023-02-21
Assignee
Inventors
- John J. Vajo (West Hills, CA, US)
- Jason GRAETZ (Calabasas, CA, US)
- Alain A. Adjorlolo (Seattle, WA, US)
Cpc classification
C01G23/002
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C22/54
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/76
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/72
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/74
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01P2002/77
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
A crystalline titanium and magnesium compound having an X-ray diffraction pattern having interplanar spacing (d-spacing) values at about 5.94, 3.10, 2.97, 2.10, 1.98, 1.82, and 1.74±0.1 angstroms may be used in protective coatings for metal or metal alloy substrates. The coatings exhibit excellent corrosion resistances and provide corrosion protection equal to or better than typical non-chromate coatings.
Claims
1. A crystalline titanium and magnesium compound, having an X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern having interplanar spacing (d-spacing) values at 5.94, 3.10, 2.97, 2.10, 1.98, 1.82, and 1.74 angstroms.
2. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 1, wherein the XRD pattern has additional interplanar spacing (d-spacing) values at 1.62, 1.57, 1.55, 1.48, 1.44, 1.34, 1.28, 1.21, 1.18, 1.15, 1.13, 1.08, 1.03 angstroms.
3. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 1, further having a cubic symmetry and a lattice parameter from about 10.225 angstroms to about 10.325 angstroms.
4. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 1, further having an XRD pattern, produced with an x-ray wavelength of 1.54 angstroms (Cu k alpha), having peaks at 14.89°, 28.78°, 30.09°, 43.10°, 45.85°, 50.20°, and 52.66°±0.25 2θ.
5. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 4, further having XRD peaks, produced with an x-ray wavelength of 1.54 angstroms (Cu k alpha), at 56.63°, 58.90°, 59.65°, 62.59°, 64.75°, 70.31°, 73.71°, 79.02°, 81.63°, 84.20°, 86.23°, 91.34°, and 96.59°±0.25 2θ.
6. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 1, wherein titanium is present at about 15 at % to about 25 at % and magnesium is present at about 1 at % to about 8 at %.
7. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 6, further comprising oxygen and fluorine.
8. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 7, wherein the oxygen is present at about 30 at % to about 45 at % and the fluorine is present at about 30 at % to about 40 at %.
9. The crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 8, wherein titanium is present at about 25 at %, magnesium is present at about 5 at %, oxygen is present at about 35 at %, and fluorine is present at about 35 at %.
10. A protective coating comprising the crystalline titanium and magnesium compound of claim 1.
11. The protective coating of claim 10, further comprising titanium dioxide.
12. The protective coating of claim 10, having a thickness of about 500 nm to about 10 μm.
13. A method of preparing a crystalline titanium and magnesium compound, having an X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern having interplanar spacing (d-spacing) values at 5.94, 3.10, 2.97, 2.10, 1.98, 1.82, and 1.74 angstroms, comprising: preparing a solution comprising: a titanium compound at a concentration of about 0.1 M to about 0.4 M, boric acid at a concentration of about 0.3 M to about 1 M, sodium tetraborate at a concentration of about greater than 0 M to about 0065 M, and a magnesium compound at a concentration of about 0.01 M to about 0.1 M.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the titanium compound comprises ammonium hexafluorotitanate and the magnesium compound comprises one or more of magnesium acetate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium chloride, or magnesium nitrate.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein preparing the solution comprises: dissolving the boric acid, the sodium tetraborate, and the magnesium compound in water to form a first solution; dissolving the titanium compound in water to form a second solution; and pouring the second solution into the first solution.
16. A method, comprising: preparing a solution comprising a titanium compound at a concentration of about 0.1 M to about 0.4 M, boric acid at a concentration of about 0.3 M to about 1 M, sodium tetraborate at a concentration of about greater than 0 M to about 0.0065 M, and a magnesium compound at a concentration of about 0.01 M to a 0.1 M to form a titanium/magnesium solution.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: reacting a metal surface with the titanium/magnesium solution; and drying the metal surface with the titanium/magnesium solution to form a titanium/magnesium protective coating on the metal surface.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein reacting the metal surface with the titanium/magnesium solution comprises immersing the metal surface in the titanium/magnesium solution.
19. The method of claim 17, further comprising applying a primer and/or a paint on the titanium/magnesium protective coating.
20. The method of claim 17, wherein the metal surface comprises aluminum or an aluminum alloy substrate selected from 2024-T3 aluminum alloy, 6061 aluminum alloy, or 7075 aluminum alloy.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(7) Coatings for corrosion protection that do not include hexavalent chromium are provided. The coating is deposited from a precursor solution including boric acid, a titanium compound, sodium tetraborate, and a magnesium compound dissolved in water, and includes a novel crystalline titanium and magnesium compound. Elemental analysis of the deposited coating by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) yielded a composition of about 23 at % titanium, 4 at % magnesium, 37 at % oxygen, and 36 at % fluorine.
(8) Advantageously, the titanium/magnesium coating exhibits corrosion resistances greater than 100 times the resistance of uncoated aluminum substrates, which is a level of corrosion resistance similar to the resistance of commercial chromate-based coatings. Accordingly, the titanium/magnesium coating provides corrosion protection equal to or better than conventional non-chromate coatings.
(9)
(10) At block 102, a composition including boric acid, sodium tetraborate, and a magnesium compound is prepared. For example, boric acid (H.sub.3BO.sub.3), sodium tetraborate decahydrate (Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10H.sub.2O), and a magnesium salt (e.g., magnesium acetate (Mg(CH.sub.3COO).sub.2), magnesium sulfate (MgSO.sub.4), magnesium chloride (MgCl.sub.2), and/or magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2) are dissolved in water. In some examples, MgCl.sub.2 is used (even though chloride ions are known to accelerate the corrosion of metal). The chloride ion etches the native surface oxide, which leads to the deposition of a more adherent coating. In addition, a magnesium cation is included (rather than a sodium cation), because the sodium cation is known to deposit coatings containing Na.sub.5Ti.sub.3F.sub.14.
(11) At block 104, a composition including a titanium compound is prepared. For example, ammonium hexafluorotitanate ((NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6) is dissolved in water.
(12) At block 106, the composition of block 102 is mixed with the composition of block 104 to provide a titanium/magnesium solution. For example, the composition of block 104 is poured into the composition of block 102, and the resulting solution is stirred. In certain examples, the titanium/magnesium solution includes the titanium compound at a concentration of about 0.1 M to about 0.4 M, the boric acid at a concentration of about 0.3 M to about 1 M, the sodium tetraborate at a concentration of about greater than 0 M to about 0.0065 M, and the magnesium compound at a concentration of about 0.01 M to a 0.1 M. An exemplary titanium/magnesium solution is an aqueous solution including 0.2 M (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6, 0.6 M H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.0065 M Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10H.sub.2O, and 0.02 M MgSO.sub.4.
(13) Variations in the concentrations of the different components may be used. Variable concentrations may affect aspects of the titanium/magnesium coatings including: (1) physical characteristics of the coating such as thickness and morphology (e.g., smooth, rough, continuous, patchy), (2) chemical properties of the coating such as rate of deposition, elemental composition, and phases, and (3) performance of the coating such as corrosion resistance (both the initial corrosion and the durability of the corrosion resistance over time in a corrosive environment), adhesion to the substrate (which can influence the corrosion resistance), and the adhesion of paints, primers, or overcoats.
(14)
(15) At block 208, the titanium/magnesium solution is reacted with a metal surface. In various examples, the metal surface is an aluminum surface. In some examples, the metal surface is an aluminum alloy surface. In one example, reacting the metal surface with the titanium/magnesium solution includes immersing the metal surface in the titanium/magnesium solution. For example, the metal surface may be immersed in the titanium/magnesium solution at room temperature for about 0.5 hours to about 20 hours (e.g., 16 or 17 hours). Shorter times at room temperature may also be used.
(16) In addition, higher temperatures (e.g., 60° C.) may be used with shorter times (e.g., 4 hours). The coating time and temperature generally affect the thickness of the coating and the rate of deposition, respectively. The thickness of the coating is generally between about 500 nm and about 10 μm, such as between about 500 nm and about 2 μm, between about 250 nm and 5 μm, or between about 100 nm and about 10 μm. Time and temperature may also affect other properties of the coating.
(17) In other examples, reacting the metal surface with the titanium/magnesium solution includes spray applying the titanium/magnesium solution on the metal surface.
(18) In some examples, the metal surface is prepared or pre-treated before it is reacted with the titanium/magnesium solution. For example, the metal surface may be wiped with isopropyl alcohol, or treated with Ardrox® products or a tankline process solution. In another example, the metal surface is smoothed/polished or roughened before it is reacted with the titanium/magnesium solution.
(19) Initially, it appears that the titanium/magnesium solution etches the metal surface thereby removing surface contamination, regardless of the initial surface preparation. Evidence for this etching comes from visual observations that (1) after wiping with isopropyl alcohol, the metal surface is hydrophobic, (2) the metal surface is still largely hydrophobic after immersing it in the coating solution for less than 1 minute and (3) by 2 to 3 minutes after immersing it in the coating solution, the metal surface becomes completely hydrophilic and the coating solution forms a continuous (e.g., break-free) layer over the metal surface.
(20) This transition of the surface from hydrophobic to hydrophilic occurs without any apparent coating on the surface. Thus, it appears that within the first 3 minutes of contact with the coating solution, the surface is etched to form a hydrophilic surface. This etching occurs without significant deposition of any coating. Subsequently, a coating is deposited on the etched, hydrophilic metal surface.
(21) At block 210, the metal surface is dried to form a titanium/magnesium protective coating. For example, the metal surface may be dried at room temperature. In various examples, the titanium/magnesium protective coating appears with an iridescent color of red to green. This likely indicates that the coating is optically transparent. In several examples, the titanium/magnesium protective coating includes a mixture of two or more compounds and further includes titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2).
(22) In some examples, organic coatings such as primer and paint are applied to the dried titanium/magnesium protective coating. For example, primer may be applied to the dried titanium/magnesium protective coating, and the paint is applied on the primer.
(23) The chemical phase of the titanium/magnesium coating and the precipitate that forms concurrently with the titanium/magnesium coating was measured using X-ray diffraction (XRD), with Cu K-alpha radiation (wavelength=1.5406 Å).
(24)
(25) The top two XRD patterns are from precipitates that form concurrently with the titanium/magnesium coating. These spectra contain no aluminum peaks because they are from precipitates that formed in the bulk of the coating solution without involving the aluminum panel. As can be seen, these precipitates contain the same crystalline phase seen in the titanium/magnesium coatings. In addition, the precipitates contain an amorphous (or very poorly crystalline) TiO.sub.2 phase. No TiO.sub.2 is evident in the XRD pattern of the coatings. However, broad peaks from poorly crystalline TiO.sub.2 could be hidden by the diffraction peaks from the aluminum alloy substrate.
(26)
(27) Table 1 below provides 20 peak positions (with an uncertainty of ±0.25°) and corresponding lattice spacing for the precipitate.
(28) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 XRD DATA No. Two Theta (Deg) Interplanar Spacing d (Å) 1 14.89 5.94 2 28.78 3.10 3 30.09 2.97 4 43.10 2.10 5 45.85 1.98 6 50.20 1.82 7 52.66 1.74 8 56.63 1.62 9 58.90 1.57 10 59.65 1.55 11 62.59 1.48 12 64.75 1.44 13 70.31 1.34 14 73.71 1.28 15 79.02 1.21 16 81.63 1.18 17 84.20 1.15 18 86.23 1.13 19 91.34 1.08 20 96.59 1.03
(29) The XRD peaks were compared to patterns of over 400,000 compounds in several XRD databases without finding a match. Based on this, the XRD pattern appears to characterize a novel crystalline titanium and magnesium compound.
(30) Although the exact composition and atomic positions are unknown, the XRD pattern may correspond to a structure with a cubic symmetry with a lattice parameter of about a=10.275 ű0.05 Å. Identical patterns were obtained using Mg(CH.sub.3COO).sub.2, MgSO.sub.4, MgCl.sub.2, or Mg(NO.sub.3).sub.2, indicating that the various anions are not present in the crystal structure. Similarly, the same pattern was obtained when using dipotassium titanium hexafluoride (K.sub.2TiF.sub.6) or (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6, indicating that the cations are not present in the crystal structure.
(31) Thermal stabilities show that the crystalline phase decomposes with gentle heating at 150° C. (substantially decomposed) and 250° C. (completely decomposed). Thermal stabilities may be measured by any technique known in the art, such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), or accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC). Thermal stabilities may also be measured using a temperature treatment (ramp or soak) and XRD (in situ or ex situ) to identify a phase change. Concurrent disappearance of all the peaks with heating indicates that the XRD pattern very likely belongs to a single phase. The low decomposition temperature of 250° C. indicates that the phase likely contains hydroxide anions, molecularly bound water, or possibly molecularly bound HF.
(32)
EXAMPLE 1
(33) Two coated panels were made using the following procedure. First, 18.594 g of H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 1.249 g Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10H.sub.2O, and 1.206 g of MgSO.sub.4 were dissolved in 399.95 g of deionized (DI) water in a 1000 mL beaker with magnetic stirring. Next, 19.811 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was dissolved in 100.027 g DI water in a 250 mL beaker with magnetic stirring. The titanium solution was poured into the boric acid solution and stirred for 15 seconds. Approximately half of the combined coating solution was poured into each of two 5″×7″ trays.
(34) Two aluminum alloy 2024 panels were attached using double-back tape to two fixtures designed for holding 4″×6″ panels facedown approximately 0.5 inch above the bottom of the trays. The faces to be coated on the aluminum panels were wiped with isopropyl alcohol.
(35) The fixtures were placed into the trays containing the coating solution. The fixtures were sloshed back and forth for about 2 to 3 minutes, and checked by lifting out to ensure that the aluminum surface to be coated was completely wet by the coating solution (e.g., water-break-free surface) and was free of any trapped air bubbles. The trays were covered to reduce evaporation and left at room temperature overnight.
(36) After 17 hours, the fixtures with the aluminum panels were lifted out of the trays. The coated surfaces were rinsed under running DI water for about 5 minutes and wiped gently with wet Kimwipes™. The panels were pried off of the double-back tape. The backside of the panels were rinsed with DI water and scrubbed with a maroon Scotch-Brite™ pad. The panels were blown free of water with compressed nitrogen and allowed to dry in air.
EXAMPLE 2
(37) Following coating, 2024-T3 aluminum alloy samples were tested for corrosion protection in a bulk electrolyte consisting of 0.1 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution buffered with borate at pH 6.4. Standard electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques were used to determine the polarization resistance. The polarization resistance is a measure of the corrosion protection, with higher polarization resistance corresponding to improved corrosion protection. The polarization resistances of several coatings as a function of time in the corrosive 0.1 M NaCl solution are shown in
(38) For reference, a coating made with a commercial chromate-based conversion coating product (Alodine® 600) is shown. The initial resistance is about 600 kOhm-cm.sup.2, and then decreases to about 25 kOhms-cm.sup.2 in about 1 day.
(39) A coating made with NaCl added to the solution instead of MgCl.sub.2is also shown. This coating has an initial resistance of about 300 kOhm-cm.sup.2, which decreases to about 100 kOhms-cm.sup.2 and remains at 100 kOhms-cm.sup.2 up to at least 1 day.
(40) A coating in accordance with an example of the present disclosure was made using MgCl.sub.2. The coating solution contained 1.489 g H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.036 g of MgCl.sub.2, and 1.584 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 dissolved in 39.977 g of deionized water. The (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was added last and stirred for 2 min. Two 1″×1″ 2024 aluminum coupons were coated by immersing the coupons face down in the coating solution for 16 hours. The initial resistance was about 200 kOhms-cm.sup.2. This resistance decreased to 80 kOhms-cm.sup.2 in 4 days. The maintained high resistance illustrates the better durability for corrosion protection for coatings with the novel crystalline titanium/magnesium phase.
(41) A coating in accordance with an example of the present disclosure was made using Mg(CH.sub.3COO).sub.2. The coating solution contained 9.318 g H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.539 g of Mg(CH.sub.3COO).sub.2, and 9.940 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 dissolved in 250.12 g of deionized water. The (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was added last and stirred for 2 minutes. One 1″×1″ 2024 aluminum coupon was coated by immersing the coupon face down in about 20 mL of the coating solution for 16 hours. The initial resistance was about 100 kOhms-cm.sup.2. This resistance increased to greater than 200 kOhms-cm.sup.2 before decreasing to about 100 kOhms-cm.sup.2 in 4 days.
(42) A coating in accordance with an example of the present disclosure was made using MgSO.sub.4. The coating solution contained 9.298 g H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.601 g of MgSO.sub.4, and 9.298 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 dissolved in 250 g of deionized water. The (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was added last and stirred for 4 minutes. One 1″×1″ 2024 aluminum coupon was coated by immersing the coupon face down in about 20 mL of the coating solution for 16 hours. The initial resistance was 300 kOhms-cm.sup.2. This resistance increased to 3,000 kOhms-cm.sup.2 (3 MOhms-cm.sup.2) before beginning to decrease.
(43) A coating in accordance with an example of the present disclosure was made using 0.02 M MgSO.sub.4 and 0.0065 M Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10H.sub.2O at high pH. The coating solution contained 2.979 g H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.203 g of Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10 H.sub.2O, 0.198 g of MgSO.sub.4, and 3.154 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 dissolved in 80.012 g of deionized water. The (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was added last and stirred for 2.5 minutes. Four 1″×1″ 2024 aluminum coupons were coated by immersing the coupons face down each in about 20 mL of the coating solution for 16 hours. This coating solution was designated “high pH” because of the added Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7.10H.sub.2O, which raised the pH slightly from about pH=3-4 to about pH=4. The initial resistance was 160 kOhms-cm.sup.2. This resistance increased to 400 kOhms-cm.sup.2 and was maintained between 200 kOhms-cm.sup.2 and 400 kOhms-cm.sup.2 for at least 10 days.
EXAMPLE 3
(44) In order to be able to reuse the coating solution multiple times, a coating solution was prepared containing 0.375 g H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 0.096 g of MgSO.sub.4, and 1.579 g of (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 dissolved in 40.003 g of deionized water. The (NH.sub.4).sub.2TiF.sub.6 was added last and stirred for 4 minutes. Two 1″×1″ 2024 aluminum coupons were coated by immersing the coupon face down each in about 20 mL of the coating solution for 16 hours. After this initial run of using the coating solution, the same coating solution was used repeatedly for an additional 5 runs (6 in total) over 10 calendar days. Coatings were obtained from each run, with the sixth run coating having a resistance of 120 kOhms-cm.sup.2.
(45) When introducing elements of the present invention or exemplary aspects or example(s) thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there can be additional elements other than the listed elements. Although this invention has been described with respect to specific examples, the details of these examples are not to be construed as limitations. Different aspects, examples and features are defined in detail herein. Each aspect, example or feature so defined can be combined with any other aspect(s), example(s) or feature(s) (preferred, advantageous or otherwise) unless clearly indicated to the contrary. Examples described above illustrate but do not limit the invention. It should also be understood that numerous modifications and variations are possible in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is defined only by the following claims.