SELF-HEALING RUBBER COMPRISING A POLY(METHACRYLIC) OLIGOMER

Abstract

The present invention relates to a rubber composition comprising a poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer, a process for preparing the rubber composition, a cured rubber composition, and a self-healing tire prepared by using the rubber composition. The invention further relates to an amphiphilic block copolymer, and a process for its preparation. The amphiphilic block copolymer can be used as compatibilizer in the preparation of the rubber composition.

Claims

1-19. (canceled)

20. A process for preparing a rubber composition, comprising: (A) polymerizing methacrylic acid in the presence of a Co(II) complex as catalytic chain transfer agent, to obtain a poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer having a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) from 160 to 3200 g/mol and a dispersity ? of equal to or less than 4; and (B) blending the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer with zinc oxide, a dienic rubber, sulfur, and a vulcanization accelerator.

21. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (B), the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer is mixed with zinc oxide to obtain a Zn salt of the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer, before blending with the dienic rubber, sulfur, and vulcanization accelerator.

22. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (A), a molecular weight of the poly(methacrylic acid)oligomer is controlled by a ratio of methacrylic acid to Co(II) complex, wherein a ratio of methacrylic acid to Co(II) complex of 10.sup.6:20 to 10.sup.6:180 is used.

23. The process of claim 20, wherein the Co(II) complex is a cobaloxime boron fluoride.

24. The process of claim 23, wherein the Co(II) complex is bis[(difluoroboryl)-dimethylglyoximato]cobalt(II).

25. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (B), the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer is mixed with zinc oxide at a weight ratio of 1.0:0.2 to 1.0:2.0.

26. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (B), the dienic rubber is selected from a group consisting of: a natural rubber; an isoprene rubber; a styrene-butadiene rubber; a butadiene rubber; and combinations thereof.

27. The process of claim 21, wherein: in step (B), an amount of the Zn salt of the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer is 5.0 to 40 phr, based on 100 phr of the dienic rubber.

28. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (B), additionally an amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer is used, wherein the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer comprises at least a poly(methacrylic acid) block and an aliphatic carbon chain block, wherein both blocks are connected via a sulfide linkage.

29. The process of claim 28, wherein an amount of the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer is 0.5 to 7.5 phr, based on 100 phr of the dienic rubber.

30. The process of claim 20, wherein: in step (B), additionally a filler is used in an amount of 5.0 to 80 phr, based on 100 phr of the dienic rubber.

31. The process of claim 20, further comprising curing the rubber composition.

32. A rubber composition comprising: a poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer, or a Zn salt of a poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer, having a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) in a range of from 160 to 3200 g/mol; zinc oxide; a dienic rubber; filler; sulfur; and a vulcanization accelerator.

33. The rubber composition of claim 32, comprising an amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer comprising a poly(methacrylic acid) block and an aliphatic carbon chain block, wherein both of the poly(methacrylic acid) block and the aliphatic carbon chain block are connected via a sulfide linkage.

34. An amphiphilic block copolymer comprising: a poly(methacrylic acid) block having a molecular weight in the range of from 160 to 3200 g/mol; and an aliphatic hydrocarbon chain block; wherein both blocks are connected via a sulfide linkage.

Description

[0045] The Figures show:

[0046] FIG. 1 shows the catalytic chain transfer polymerization (CCTP) of methacrylic acid using a Co (II) complex, to yield the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer (p(MAA) oligomer).

[0047] FIG. 2 shows the formation of the Zn salt from poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer and zinc oxide.

[0048] FIG. 3 shows the synthesis of the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer following three steps of (i) catalytic chain transfer polymerization; (ii) dimethylphenylphosphine (DMPP) catalyzed Michael addition of a thiol to the unsaturated end group of poly(tert-butyl methacrylate) macromonomer; and (iii) hydrolysis of the tert-butyl groups of the macromonomer by trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

[0049] FIGS. 4a and 4b are diagrams of stress versus stroke strain for cured rubbers of the examples.

[0050] FIGS. 5a, 5c and 5e are diagrams of stress versus stroke strain for cured rubbers of the examples at different healing conditions; FIGS. 5b, 5d and 5f show the corresponding diagrams of stress versus stroke strain recovery.

[0051] FIGS. 6a to 6c are images of an optical microscope of the healing of a cured rubber at different healing conditions.

[0052] FIGS. 7a and 7b are SEM images of a cured rubber after 30 min healing at 80? C.

[0053] FIG. 8 is a diagram of stress versus stroke strain for cured rubbers of the examples, including rubbers containing the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer of the invention.

[0054] FIGS. 9a to 9c are diagrams of stress versus stroke strain for cured rubbers containing the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer of the invention at different healing conditions.

[0055] FIG. 10a shows stress versus stroke strain for cured rubbers containing 40 phr of carbon black that is 80 nm is diameter. FIG. 10b shows the recovery after self-healing at 80? C. for 30 minutes and 2 hours, and FIG. 10c shows the recovery after self-healing at room temperature for 72 hours.

[0056] FIG. 11 shows an illustration of the process used to quantify the self-healing efficiency of the rubbers.

[0057] FIGS. 12a and 12b are diagrams of stress versus stroke strain for cured styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and butadiene rubber (BR), respectively, with examples at different healing conditions; FIGS. 12c and 12d show the corresponding diagrams of stress versus strain recovery.

[0058] Preferred embodiments of the invention are described in the description hereinafter, in the examples, the figures and the claims.

[0059] The rubber composition according to the present invention is a curable composition and comprises at least a dienic rubber, a poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer of specified molecular weight, zinc oxide (ZnO), sulfur, a vulcanization accelerator, and preferably a filler.

[0060] The dienic rubber is preferably selected from natural rubber (NR), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), an isoprene rubber, a butadiene rubber (BR), or combinations thereof. Preferably, natural rubber (NR), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), or a combination thereof is used. Suitable blends are 80 to 90 weight-% of natural rubber and 20 to 10 weight-% of styrene-butadiene rubber, based on 100 weight-% of the rubber.

[0061] According to the invention the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer before the formation of a salt has a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) in the range of from 160 to 3200 g/mol, with a dispersity (?) of equal to or less than 4, preferably from 240 to 2400 g/mol with a dispersity (?) of equal to or less than 2, more preferably from 240 to 1200 with a dispersity (?) of less than 2. The molecular weight of 160 to 3200 g/mol corresponds to a degree of polymerization of 2-40.

[0062] The oligomer is produced by polymerization of methacrylic acid (MAA) via catalytic chain transfer (CCT) using a cobalt (II) complex, wherein the polymerization or the molecular weight of the oligomer is controlled by the ratio of the monomer (MAA) and the catalyst. An exemplary embodiment for producing the oligomer using cobaloxime as catalyst is shown in FIG. 1, wherein the group R of the polymer chain is H, and the group R of the cobaloxime is a group selected such to allow its solubility in the monomer/solvent system used, for example, R is methyl.

[0063] The cobalt(II) complex or catalyst can be any cobalt complex known in the art for catalytic chain transfer polymerization (CCTP). Suitable catalysts are described, for example, in EP 1 295 922 A2, U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,090,724 B2 and 9,580,529 B2. Preferably, bis[(difluoroboryl)-dimethylglyoximato]cobalt(II) is used, which is shown in FIG. 1.

[0064] ZnO is commonly used as additive in rubber compositions for tires. In the present invention, ZnO is used for forming a salt with the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer (p(MAA)) oligomer). FIG. 2 shows the catalytic chain transfer polymerization (CCTP) of methacrylic acid to result in the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer (p(MAA) oligomer), which, upon addition of zinc oxide, forms a zinc salt. The zinc salt preferably is added as preformed salt into the rubber composition.

[0065] In addition, it is possible to add ZnO and the p(MAA) oligomer separately into the rubber composition and the Zn salt forms in-situ.

[0066] The weight ratio of poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer to ZnO is in the range of from 1.0:0.2 to 1.0:2.0, preferably from 1.0:0.5 to 1.0:1.5, for example 1.0:1.0.

[0067] It is believed that the zinc salt of p(MAA) oligomer/ZnO generates a reversible (non-covalent) ionic supramolecular network in cured rubber providing self-healing ability to the rubber. Particularly, it is believed that ionic pairs of the zinc cations and the carboxylic acid units that are woven into the rubber form hierarchical cluster. The ionic clusters are believed to contribute simultaneously to the self-healing ability and the mechanical strength of the rubber.

[0068] Suitable fillers for the rubber composition are subject to no restrictions and known in the art of tire production. Exemplary fillers are carbon black, silica, and combinations thereof. Both carbon black and silica with specific surface areas are commercially available and can be used. Fillers are typically used in amounts of 5 phr to 80 phr, preferably of 5 phr to 50 phr, more preferably of 10 phr to 40 phr.

[0069] In the present invention, sulfur is used as crosslinking agent in the vulcanization. The sulfur provides covalent crosslinks in the cured rubber composition contributing to the mechanical strength of the cured rubber.

[0070] Suitable vulcanization accelerators are based on sulfenamide compounds and/or thiazole compounds. Preferably, N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide (known as CBS) or tetramethylthiuram monosulfide is used.

[0071] For a better dispersion of the components in the rubber composition, a compatibilizer can be used. Suitable compatibilizers are known in the art. Exemplary compatibilizers are block copolymers containing one (meth)acrylic acid block made using CCTP (catalytic chain transfer polymerization), RAFT (reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer) polymerization or ATRP (atom transfer radical polymerization). A particularly preferred compatibilizer is an amphiphilic block copolymer comprising at least a poly(methacrylic acid) block having a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) of 160 to 1600 g/mol and an aliphatic hydrocarbon chain block, wherein both blocks are connected via a sulfide linkage. An exemplary embodiment for producing this compatibilizer is shown in FIG. 3 and is described below.

[0072] The rubber composition can comprise further additives, in particular additives that are commonly used in the art for tire production. Such additives are lubricants, pigments, activators, softeners, plasticizers, antioxidants, fatty acids (such as stearic acid). Commonly, the total amount of these additives is not more than 10 weight-% based on the 100 weight-% of the rubber composition or not more than 10 phr.

[0073] The invention also provides cured rubber compositions obtained after curing of the curable rubber compositions of the invention. The curing can be carried out as known in the art and is subject to no restrictions. Suitable curing temperatures are in the range of from 150 to 160? C.

[0074] The invention further provides self-healing tires produced by using the rubber composition of the invention. The rubber composition used for producing the tire comprises at least partly the rubber composition of the invention, depending on the desired degree of self-healing property of the tire. Preferably, at least 90 weight-%, more preferably about 100 weight-%, of the rubber composition of the invention are used in the rubber composition of the tire. The production of the tires from the rubber composition in suitable devices is carried out as known in the art.

[0075] During curing of the rubber composition, a proportion of the ?-vinyl end groups of the pMAA/ZnO salt are coupled (grafted) to the vinyl group of the dienic rubber backbone. The coupling is either direct or through a sulfur bridge. In addition, covalent links due to sulfur linkages are formed as known in the art.

[0076] The rubber composition of the invention imparts self-healing properties and high mechanical strength to the tire.

[0077] The present invention further provides an amphiphilic block copolymer comprising at least a poly(methacrylic acid) block having a number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) of 160 to 1600 g/mol and an aliphatic hydrocarbon chain block, wherein both blocks are connected via a sulfide linkage. This amphiphilic block copolymer is not known in the art. An exemplary embodiment for producing this amphiphilic block copolymer is shown in FIG. 3, wherein Co(II) designates a cobalt(II) complex; V-601 designates a polymerization initiator (dimethyl 2,2-azobis(2-methylpropionate)); DMPP designates dimethylphenylphosphine; R in the thiol compound RSH designates an aliphatic hydrocarbon chain, preferably is a linear alkyl group having 6 to 30 carbon atoms; and n is an integer between 2 and 20.

[0078] The synthesis first involves the polymerization of tert-butyl methacrylate, using a polymerization initiator, in the presence of a Co(II) complex as catalytic chain transfer agent, to obtain a poly(tert-butyl methacrylate) oligomer. This oligomer is further reacted with thiol compound RSH in the presence of DMPP to produce the addition product via Michael-addition. Then, the addition product is hydrolyzed in the presence of an acid, such as trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), to release the butyl groups from the ester groups. The obtained product has methacrylic acid groups.

[0079] The Co(II) complex used in the compatibilizer synthesis can be the same Co(II) complex as used in the synthesis of the poly(methacrylic acid) oligomer.

[0080] The amphiphilic block copolymer is blended in the rubber composition when blending the other components. In an exemplary embodiment, first the rubber is provided in the mixing apparatus, then the compatibilizer is added, and thereafter the other components are added. The compatibilizer improves the dispersion of the components in the rubber composition and thus improves the self-healing and mechanical properties of the cured rubber.

[0081] The examples hereinafter illustrate the invention without restricting the scope of protection.

EXAMPLES

Examples 1 to 4

[0082] Examples 1 to 4 refer to different rubber compositions which show the effect of pMAA oligomer and ZnO on the self-healing and mechanical properties of the rubber after curing.

[0083] The formulations used are indicated in Table 1 below, wherein the numerical values relate to phr.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 NR SM.sub.41 NR SM.sub.42 NR SM.sub.43 NR M.sub.41 NR 100 100 100 100 pMAA-ZnO 10 15 20 salt pMAA 5 ZnO 5 CBS 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sulfur 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7

[0084] The indicated components were as follows. [0085] NR: natural rubber. [0086] pMAA: pMAA oligomer having M.sub.n of 350 g/mol and T.sub.g (glass transition temperature) of 109? C. The oligomer was produced from methacrylic acid using cobaloxime boron fluoride at a ratio of MAA to cobaloxime of 106:160. [0087] pMAA-ZnO salt: preformed salt of pMAA with ZnO in a ratio of 1:1. [0088] CBS: N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide. [0089] Sulfur: commercially available sulfur for tire production.

[0090] The components are blended as indicated in a Haake PolyLab twin screw compounder at 40? C. and at 40 rpm. Samples were then cured at a temperature of 150? C. for 18.10 minutes at a pressure of 150 bar in a Collin P200 Hot Press to form 9?9 cm.sup.2 films with a thickness of 1 mm.

[0091] As shown in FIG. 11, first dog bone shaped samples were cut from the films for tensile testing (picture 1). Then, samples for self-healing tests were prepared by cutting the cured rubbers and re-joining them at the overlap end, as illustrated in picture 2 of FIG. 11. Then the samples with 12.8 mm.sup.2 overlapped area were heated to 80? C. in a Collin P200 Hot Press for 15, 30 or 120 minutes to provide healing conditions (picture 3). Finally, to evaluate their mechanical properties (stress and strain to break) and healing ability, tensile tests were performed (picture 4), and the results compared with those obtained from the pristine samples. A breakage was not observed in the overlapped region.

[0092] The mechanical properties were evaluated by measuring stress (MPa) vs. stroke strain (%) on a Shimadzu AGS-X tensile tester at a strain rate of 100 mm/min. The results for the three formulations containing the preformed Zn salt are shown in FIG. 4a. FIG. 4b shows the results of the formulation NR SM.sub.41 containing 10 phr of the preformed Zn salt in comparison with the formulation containing the same amount of the pMAA oligomer and ZnO separately.

[0093] The three formulations containing the preformed Zn salt were further tested on their mechanical strength at different healing conditions according to using an identical method as was used for the pristine samples. The results are shown in FIGS. 5a to 5f.

[0094] Furthermore, the self-healing efficiency was tested for the NR SM.sub.43 formulation at different temperatures and time periods by viewing under an optical microscope. The images obtained after 0, 30 and 120 minutes are shown in FIGS. 6a, 6b and 6c. FIG. 6 shows that good adhesion is observed immediately after surface contact. As shown in FIG. 6b, after 30 min at 80? C. only a small amount of scarring is visible. After 120 min at 80? C., the surface appears uniformly homogenous, as shown in FIG. 6c.

[0095] FIGS. 7a and 7b show SEM images of a sample of the NR SM.sub.43 formulation after 30 min healing at 80? C.

[0096] The results obtained show that the addition of the preformed zinc salt improved significantly the mechanical strength compared with adding pMAA and ZnO separately (NR M.sub.41). Particularly, for the sample NR SM.sub.43 more than 85% of the stress and strain to break were recovered at the self-healing condition of 80? C. for 120 min. The self-healing ability was strongly improved at an increased temperature of 80? C., compared to room temperature.

Examples 5 to 8

[0097] Examples 5 to 8 refer to different rubber compositions which show the effect of the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer on self-healing and mechanical properties of the rubber after curing.

[0098] The formulations used are indicated in Table 2 below, wherein the numerical values relate to phr.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 NR SM.sub.43 NR B.sub.31 NR B.sub.32 NR B.sub.33 NR 100 100 100 100 pMAA-ZnO salt * 20 20 20 20 CBS 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sulfur 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Block B.sub.3 2.5 5.0 7.5

[0099] The indicated components were as follows. [0100] NR: natural rubber (same rubber as used according to Table 1). [0101] pMAA-ZnO salt: preformed salt of pMAA with ZnO in a ratio of 1:1 with pMAA oligomer having M.sub.n of 350 g/mol and T.sub.g (glass transition temperature) of 109? C. [0102] CBS: N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide. [0103] Sulfur: same sulfur as used according to Table 1. [0104] Block B.sub.3: amphiphilic block copolymer.

[0105] The amphiphilic block copolymer B.sub.3 was prepared as shown in FIG. 3 as follows: A p(t-BMA) oligomer was prepared using CCTP. Here, CoBF (1.31 mg, 8 ppm relative to monomer) was added to a 250 mL RBF (round bottom flask) along with a magnetic stirrer and deoxygenated by nitrogen sparging for 1 hour. tert-Butyl methacrylate (75 mL) was added to a separate 250 mL RBF and also deoxygenated for 1 hour, before 69 mL (424.58 mmol) was transferred to the CoBF (cobaloxime boron fluoride) using a deoxygenated syringe. The mixture was stirred to fully dissolve the CoBF. Meanwhile, to a 500 mL three-necked RBF was added V-601 initiator (0.488 g, 2.12 mmol) and methyl ethyl ketone (180 mL), and the solution was deoxygenated for 1 hour. The solution in the three-necked flask was then heated in an oil bath to 70? C. with continuous stirring, and the monomer/CoBF solution was fed into it over 60 minutes using a syringe pump. The reaction was continued for a further 17 hours after feeding. The p(t-BMA) oligomer product was then dried by rotary evaporation. For the Michael-addition step, p(t-BMA) oligomer (18 g, 18 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (120 mL) and deoxygenated for 1 hour. Previously deoxygenated dodecanethiol (4.368 g, 1.2 equivalent) and dimethylphenylphosphine (49.7 mg, 0.2 equivalent) were then added sequentially and the mixture stirred at room temperature for 6 hours. The reaction was then exposed to air and the solvent removed by rotary evaporation. To form the acid block, the product of the Michael addition was dissolved in dichloromethane and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was added (5 equivalents relative to tert-butyl groups). This mixture was then left to stir at room temperature for 24 hours, before the solvent and TFA were removed by rotary evaporation.

[0106] Samples for testing on self-healing ability and mechanical properties were prepared in the same manner as in Examples 1 to 4. The measuring methods were the same as in Examples 1 to 4 and the results obtained are shown in FIGS. 8 and 9a to 9c.

[0107] FIG. 8 shows stress (MPa) versus stroke strain (%) for the four formulations with and without compatibilizer.

[0108] FIGS. 9a to 9c are diagrams of stroke strain versus stress for the three cured rubbers containing the amphiphilic block copolymer compatibilizer B.sub.3. For NR B.sub.31, FIG. 9a shows after 30 mins recovery 60% tensile and 64% strain and after 2 hours recovery 88% tensile and 73% strain. For NR B.sub.32, FIG. 9b shows after 30 mins recovery 57% tensile and 66% strain and after 2 hours recovery 74% tensile and 69% strain. For NR B.sub.33, FIG. 9c shows after 30 mins recovery 88% tensile and 97% strain and after 2 hours recovery 130% tensile and 94% strain.

[0109] As can be seen, the self-healing efficiency enhanced with adding block copolymer.

Examples 9 to 12

[0110] Examples 9 to 12 refer to different rubber compositions which show the effect of adding carbon black on self-healing and mechanical properties of the rubber after curing.

[0111] The formulations used are indicated in Table 3 below, wherein the numerical values relate to phr.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 SM.sub.43 CB.sub.80 nm1 CB.sub.80 nm2 CB.sub.80 nm3 NR 100 100 100 100 pMAA-ZnO 20 20 20 20 Salt CBS 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sulfur 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 CB (N234) 40 25 10

[0112] The indicated components were as follows. [0113] NR: natural rubber (same rubber as used according to Table 1). [0114] pMAA-ZnO salt: preformed salt of pMAA with ZnO in a ratio of 1:1 with pMAA oligomer having M.sub.n of 350 g/mol and T.sub.g (glass transition temperature) of 109? C. [0115] CBS: N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide. [0116] Sulfur: same sulfur as used according to Table 1. [0117] CB (N234): Carbon black with an average diameter of 80 nm.

[0118] FIG. 10a shows stress (MPa) versus stroke strain (%) for the four formulations with and without carbon black (N234).

[0119] FIGS. 10b is a diagram of stress versus stroke strain for one of the cured rubbers containing 40 phr of carbon black after it had been cut and re-healed at 80? C. in a Collin P200 Hot Press for 30 minutes and 2 hrs.

[0120] FIGS. 10c is a diagram of stress versus stroke strain for one of the cured rubbers containing 40 phr of carbon black after it had been cut and re-healed at room temperature for 72 hours under a 2 kg weight.

[0121] As can be seen, the tensile strength after self-healing at 80? C. for 2 hours increased compared with when no filler was used, and a tensile strength of 3.5 MPa (44% stress recovery) was obtained after self-healing at room temperature.

Examples 13 and 14

[0122] Examples 13 and 14 refer to rubber compositions which show the effect of the dienic rubber base material on self-healing and mechanical properties of the rubber after curing.

[0123] The formulations used are indicated in Table 4 below, wherein the numerical values relate to phr.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 SBR SM.sub.43 TMTS BR SM.sub.43 TMTS SBR 100 BR 100 pMAA-ZnO salt 20 20 TMTS 0.14 0.14 Sulfur 0.7 0.7

[0124] The indicated components were as follows. [0125] SBR: Styrene-butadiene rubber. [0126] BR: Butadiene rubber. [0127] pMAA-ZnO salt: preformed salt of pMAA with ZnO in a ratio of 1:1 with pMAA oligomer having M.sub.n of 350 g/mol and T.sub.g (glass transition temperature) of 109? C. [0128] TMTS: Tetramethylthiuram monosulfide. [0129] Sulfur: same sulfur as used according to Table 1.

[0130] Samples for testing on self-healing ability and mechanical properties were prepared in the same manner as in Examples 1 to 4, with the exception of the curing temperature, which was 160? C., and the curing time, which was 43.17 min for SBR SM.sub.43 TMTS and 77.82 min for BR SM.sub.43 TMTS. The measuring methods were the same as in Examples 1 to 4 and the results obtained are shown in FIGS. 12a to 12d.

[0131] FIGS. 12a and 12b show stress (MPa) versus stroke strain (%) for the SBR and BR formulations with added macromonomer. FIGS. 12c and 12d show the corresponding diagrams of stress versus strain recovery.

[0132] As can be seen, the addition of the pMAA-ZnO salt also facilitates self-healing in dienic rubbers other than NR rubbers, wherein after two hours at 80? C. stress recoveries of 120% and 30% were recorded for SBR and BR, respectively.