PROCESS AND PLANT FOR PRODUCING PURE HYDROGEN BY STEAM REFORMING WITH REDUCED CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

20240294379 ยท 2024-09-05

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A process and a plant for producing pure hydrogen by steam reforming of a feed gas containing hydrocarbons. preferably natural gas or naphtha. with reduced carbon dioxide emissions are proposed. The reduction in carbon dioxide emissions is achieved in accordance with the invention in that carbon dioxide is separated both out of the converted cooled synthesis gas and out of the flue gas from the reformer furnace by means of suit-able measures.

    Claims

    1. A process for producing pure hydrogen by steam reforming of a feed gas containing hydrocarbons with reduced carbon dioxide emissions, comprising: (a) providing a feed gas stream containing gaseous or evaporated hydrocarbons, (b) introducing the feed gas stream heated to a steam reforming inlet temperature into a main reforming stage, converting the feed gas stream in the main reforming stage under steam reforming conditions in a multitude of reformer tubes filled with a solid particulate reforming catalyst to give a crude synthesis gas stream containing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and unconverted hydrocarbons, wherein the reformer tubes are disposed in a reformer furnace, the interior of which is heated by means of a multitude of burners, with formation of a steam reforming flue gas stream, and wherein the steam reforming conditions comprise the addition of steam to the feed gas containing hydrocarbons and the establishment of a defined steam/carbon ratio, (c) discharging the crude synthesis gas stream from the main reforming stage and introducing the crude synthesis gas stream into a first heat recovery apparatus, cooling the crude synthesis gas stream in the first heat recovery apparatus in indirect heat exchange with a first coolant stream, discharging the cooled crude gas synthesis stream from the first heat recovery apparatus, (d) introducing the cooled crude synthesis gas stream into a carbon monoxide conversion plant comprising at least one carbon monoxide conversion stage, converting the cooled crude synthesis gas stream introduced into the carbon monoxide conversion plant under carbon monoxide conversion conditions to a converted synthesis gas stream, discharging the converted synthesis gas stream that has been enriched in hydrogen and carbon dioxide and depleted of carbon monoxide compared to the crude synthesis gas stream, (e) introducing the converted synthesis gas stream into a second heat recovery apparatus, cooling the converted synthesis gas stream in the second heat recovery apparatus in indirect heat exchange with a second coolant stream, discharging the cooled converted synthesis gas stream from the second heat recovery apparatus, (f) introducing the cooled converted synthesis gas stream into a first carbon dioxide separation apparatus that works by means of a physical or chemical carbon dioxide separation process, discharging a carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas stream from the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus, discharging a first carbon dioxide-rich stream, (g) introducing the carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas stream into a hydrogen enrichment apparatus that works by the principle of pressure swing adsorption, discharging a pure hydrogen product stream and at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream from the hydrogen enrichment apparatus, wherein the at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream comprises carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and unconverted hydrocarbons, (h) introducing at least a portion of the at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream into at least one burner in the reformer furnace, burning the at least a portion of the at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream with combustion air and with a trim gas stream containing hydrocarbons, wherein the reformer tubes in the reformer furnace are heated and the steam reforming flue gas stream is formed, discharging the steam reforming flue gas stream from the reformer furnace, (i) introducing the steam reforming flue gas stream into a second carbon dioxide separation apparatus that works by means of a physical or chemical carbon dioxide separation process, discharging a carbon dioxide-depleted steam reforming flue gas stream from the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus, discharging a second carbon dioxide-rich stream.

    2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the feed gas stream is pretreated by means of one or more processes selected from the following group: desulfurization under desulfurization conditions and, prereforming under prereforming conditions.

    3. Process The process according to claim 1, wherein the first coolant stream guided to the first heat recovery apparatus comprises one or more fluid streams selected from the following group: water and/or aqueous condensate, to produce a first steam stream, boiler feed water, to produce a preheated boiler feed water stream, and feed gas containing hydrocarbons, to produce a preheated feed gas stream.

    4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second coolant stream guided to the second heat recovery apparatus comprises one or more fluid streams selected from the following group: water and/or aqueous condensate, to produce a second steam stream, boiler feed water, to produce a preheated boiler feed water stream, feed gas containing hydrocarbons, to produce a preheated feed gas stream, pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream, to produce a preheated pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream, and a carbon dioxide-laden absorbent stream.

    5. The process according to claim 4, wherein the carbon monoxide conversion plant and the second heat recovery apparatus coincide in terms of construction and/or functionality.

    6. The process according to claim 5, wherein the carbon monoxide conversion plant is configured as a cooled reactor, and the second coolant stream or one or more of the fluid streams comprised therein is/are used for reactor cooling.

    7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus works by at least one carbon dioxide separation process selected from the following group: (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective physical or chemical absorbent, (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, and (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane.

    8. Process The process according to claim 7, wherein the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured as a continuously operable amine scrub and comprises an absorption section and a regeneration section, wherein the regeneration of the carbon dioxide-laden scrubbing agent in the regeneration section is effected: with heating steam, in which case at least a portion of the first and/or second steam stream is used as heating steam, and/or with at least a portion of the converted synthesis gas stream.

    9. The process according to claim 8, wherein the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured as a continuously operable amine scrub and activated methyldiethanolamine is used as scrubbing agent.

    10. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus works by at least one carbon dioxide separation process selected from the following group: (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective chemical absorbent, (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane, and (d) cryogenic carbon dioxide capture.

    11. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured and operated such that at least 40% of the direct carbon dioxide emissions from the overall process are separated therein, and in that the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured and operated such that the overall degree of separation of the direct carbon dioxide emissions from the overall process is at least 89%.

    12. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first and second carbon dioxide separation apparatuses are configured and operated such that the sum total of the steam streams generated in the overall process is greater than the streams of the heating steam consumed for regeneration of the carbon dioxide separation apparatuses.

    13. The process according to claim 1, wherein the specific consumption of steam for regeneration of the carbon dioxide separation apparatuses per kg of carbon dioxide separated is less than 1.0 kg.

    14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first and second carbon dioxide-rich streams are sent to at least one common workup stage selected from the following group: common carbon dioxide dryer, common carbon dioxide compressor, and common carbon dioxide liquefaction apparatus.

    15. The process according to claim 1, wherein the process is operated in two operating periods at different times, wherein only the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is operated in the first operating period, and the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus and second carbon dioxide separation apparatus are operated in the second operating period.

    16. A plant for producing pure hydrogen by steam reforming of a feed gas containing hydrocarbons with reduced carbon dioxide emissions, comprising the following mutually fluid-connected assemblies and components: (a) a means of providing a feed gas stream containing gaseous or evaporated hydrocarbons, (b) a main reforming stage having a multitude of reformer tubes filled with a solid particulate reforming catalyst, wherein the reformer tubes are disposed in a reformer furnace, the interior of which is heated by means of a multitude of burners, with formation of a steam reforming flue gas stream, means of introducing the feed gas stream heated to a steam reforming inlet temperature into the main reforming stage, (c) a means of discharging a crude synthesis gas stream containing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and unconverted hydrocarbons from the main reforming stage, (d) a first heat recovery apparatus configured to cool the crude synthesis gas stream in indirect heat exchange with a first coolant stream, means of introducing the crude synthesis gas stream into the first heat recovery apparatus, means of discharging a cooled crude synthesis gas stream from the first heat recovery apparatus, (e) a carbon monoxide conversion plant comprising at least one carbon monoxide conversion stage, a means of introducing the cooled crude synthesis gas stream into the carbon monoxide conversion plant, a means of discharging a converted synthesis gas stream which is enriched in hydrogen and carbon dioxide and depleted of carbon monoxide compared to the crude synthesis gas stream, (f) a second heat recovery apparatus configured to cool the converted synthesis gas stream with a second coolant stream, a means of introducing the converted synthesis gas stream into the second heat recovery apparatus, a means of discharging a cooled converted synthesis gas stream from the second heat recovery apparatus, (g) a first carbon dioxide separation apparatus configured to perform a physical or chemical carbon dioxide separation process, a means of introducing the cooled converted synthesis gas stream into the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus, a means of discharging a carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas stream from the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus, a means of discharging a first carbon dioxide-rich stream. (h) a hydrogen enrichment apparatus configured by the principle of pressure swing adsorption, a means of introducing the carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas stream into the hydrogen enrichment apparatus, a means of discharging a pure hydrogen product stream and at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream from the hydrogen enrichment apparatus, wherein the at least one PSA tail gas stream comprises carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and unconverted hydrocarbons, (i) a means of introducing at least a portion of the at least one pressure swing adsorption tail gas stream and at least one trim gas stream into at least one burner in the reformer furnace, a means of discharging the steam reforming flue gas stream from the reformer furnace, (j) a second carbon dioxide separation apparatus configured to perform a physical or chemical carbon dioxide separation process, a means of discharging the steam reforming flue gas stream into the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus, a means of discharging a carbon dioxide-depleted steam reforming flue gas stream from the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus, a means of discharging a second carbon dioxide-rich stream.

    17. The plant according to claim 16, configured such that the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is operable as a continuous amine scrub with activated methyldiethanolamine as scrubbing agent and comprises an absorption section and a regeneration section, wherein: the carbon dioxide-laden scrubbing agent is regenerated in the regeneration section with heating steam and/or with at least a portion of the converted synthesis gas stream as heat carrier fluid, the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus is operable as a continuous amine scrub and comprises an absorption section and a regeneration section, wherein the regeneration of the carbon dioxide-laden scrubbing agent in the regeneration section is effected with heating steam, at least a portion of the first and/or second steam stream is used as heating steam.

    18. A process for retrofitting an existing plant for producing pure hydrogen by steam reforming for reduction of carbon dioxide emissions, wherein the retrofitting is effected in two development stages at different times, wherein only the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is installed in the first development stage and the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus is additionally installed in the second development stage.

    19. (canceled)

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0087] Further developments, advantages and possible uses of the invention are also apparent from the description of working examples that follows and the drawings. The invention is formed by any of the features described and/or depicted, either on their own or in any combination, irrespective of the way they are combined in the claims or the dependency references therein.

    [0088] The figures show:

    [0089] FIG. 1 is a first example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the prior art for producing pure hydrogen without carbon dioxide removal,

    [0090] FIG. 2 is a second example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the prior art for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the reformer furnace flue gas,

    [0091] FIG. 3 is a third example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the prior art for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas,

    [0092] FIG. 4 is a first example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the invention for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas and the reformer furnace flue gas,

    [0093] FIG. 5 is a second example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the invention for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas and the reformer furnace flue gas.

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

    [0094] A hydrogen feed gas stream introduced via conduit 11 into the process or plant, preferably methane-rich natural gas, is first treated in a hydrodesulfurization reactor (HDS) 10 in order to remove sulfur and sulfur compounds that would otherwise poison the downstream catalysts. The desulfurized feed gas stream is discharged via conduit 21, mixed with steam and guided into a prereforming reactor (prereformer) 20, where higher hydrocarbons are converted to C.sub.1 compounds, in order to avoid the high-temperature cracking of these higher hydrocarbons in later steps of the process.

    [0095] The prereformed hydrocarbon feed gas stream is discharged via conduit 31, mixed with steam in a superstoichiometric amount and introduced into a steam reforming reactor (main reforming stage) 30, comprising catalyst-filled reformer tubes and a reformer furnace. The steam-methane reforming reaction proceeds strongly endothermically; therefore, the heat for the reaction is provided by the combustion of one or more fuel gases with air in the furnace. In this case, a portion of the hydrocarbon feed gas stream can serve as a fuel gas; further fuel gases may be obtained from combustible recycling streams that are obtained within the process. The heat generated in the burners of the reformer furnace is then transferred by radiation to the catalyst-filled reformer tubes, where the prereformed hydrocarbon feed gas stream is converted with steam at high temperature to a crude synthesis gas stream consisting mainly of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide and steam, and still containing fractions of unconverted hydrocarbons. This crude synthesis gas stream is then discharged via conduit 41 from the steam reforming reactor 30, fed to a first heat recovery apparatus 40 and cooled therein, generating a first steam stream, which is indicated by a dotted arrow.

    [0096] The cooled crude synthesis gas stream is discharged via conduit 51 from the first heat recovery apparatus 40 and fed to a CO conversion plant 50 comprising one or more CO conversion stages, each of which may comprise one or more separate reactors (water-gas shift reactors) or catalyst beds. In the CO conversion plant, remaining carbon dioxide is converted by reaction with steam to additional hydrogen, forming carbon dioxide as coproduct. Since the CO conversion proceeds exothermically, the converted synthesis gas stream is then discharged via conduit 61 from the CO conversion plant 50 and fed to a second heat recovery apparatus 60 and cooled therein, generating a second steam stream, which is indicated by a dotted arrow.

    [0097] The cooled converted synthesis gas stream is discharged from the second heat recovery apparatus 60 via conduit 62 and fed to a hydrogen enrichment apparatus 80 configured as a pressure swing adsorption plant (PSA plant) in which a pure hydrogen product stream is obtained and is discharged as target product via conduit 81. Also obtained is at least one PSA tail gas stream, containing carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, unconverted methane and hydrogen. It is discharged from the PSA plant via conduit 83 and fed as further fuel gas stream to the burners of the reformer furnace.

    [0098] The combustion of the fuel gas stream(s) with combustion air in the reformer furnace generates a flue gas stream which is discharged via conduit 33 and, for example, released to the environment. A disadvantage here is that the flue gas stream contains the entire carbon dioxide emissions from the process, which are thus released unabated into the environment. This is problematic against the background of ever stricter emission regulations for greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide. A further disadvantage here is that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the steam reforming flue gas is low; but since the flue gas stream is comparatively large, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted is nevertheless considerable.

    [0099] FIG. 2 therefore shows a second example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the prior art for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the reformer furnace flue gas. The constituents of the process and of the plant and the function and properties thereof correspond to those of FIG. 1 with the same reference numerals.

    [0100] Compared to FIG. 1, FIG. 2 has an additional carbon dioxide separation apparatus 90 that serves to separate carbon dioxide from the flue gas and which is fed with the steam reforming flue gas stream via conduit 33. The carbon dioxide separation is effected here, for example, by means of one or more of the carbon dioxide separation methods specified below: [0101] (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective chemical absorbent, [0102] (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, [0103] (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane, [0104] (d) cryogenic carbon dioxide capture.

    [0105] The steam reforming flue gas that enters the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus has a comparatively low partial carbon dioxide pressure at this point in the process, for example by comparison with the partial carbon dioxide pressure in the converted synthesis gas stream. This makes it more difficult to separate the carbon dioxide, and large flue gas streams have to be treated. Therefore, chemisorptive methods of carbon dioxide separation are of better suitability here than physisorptive methods, since the latter work better at high partial carbon dioxide pressures. By contrast, methods of good suitability for carbon dioxide removal at low partial carbon dioxide pressures are, in particular, adsorption and cryogenic carbon dioxide capture, the latter being understood to mean a process as described in the above-discussed article by D. Pichot et al.

    [0106] In FIG. 2, a carbon dioxide-depleted flue gas stream is discharged from the carbon dioxide separation apparatus 90 via conduit 91. In addition, a carbon dioxide-rich stream is discharged via conduit 92, which is then fed to storage, workup or further processing (not shown in the figure).

    [0107] There are numerous disadvantages in the separation of carbon dioxide from the steam reforming flue gas. The low partial pressure of the carbon dioxide which results from the combination of low carbon dioxide concentration and low pressure of the flue gas makes it more difficult to separate the carbon dioxide. The volume flow rate of the flue gas is considerable, and large amounts of water are required to cool the flue gas before it is passed to the carbon dioxide separation plant, and the flue gas stream may also contain acidic compounds, for example sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides, that can lead to degradation of an amine-based absorbent or to corrosion of the plant. The energy demand for desorption of the carbon dioxide from the laden absorbent, for example in a configuration as amine scrub for the flue gas, is likewise higher than in the case of an amine scrub for separation of carbon dioxide from the synthesis gas. In general, an amine scrub for separation of carbon dioxide from the flue gas is less energy-and cost-efficient than a plant for separation of carbon dioxide from the synthesis gas. Considering the indirect emissions that are associated with the consumption of steam or power, it becomes clear that a less energy-efficient solution for carbon dioxide separation also leads to higher indirect emissions.

    [0108] FIG. 3 shows a third example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the prior art for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas. The constituents of the process and of the plant and the function and properties thereof correspond to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 with the same reference numerals.

    [0109] Compared to FIG. 1, FIG. 3 has an additional carbon dioxide separation apparatus 70 that serves to separate carbon dioxide from the cooled converted synthesis gas stream, which is supplied via conduit 62 and fed into it. The separation of carbon dioxide from the cooled converted synthesis gas stream is effected here, for example, by means of one or more of the carbon dioxide separation methods specified below: [0110] (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective physical or chemical absorbent, [0111] (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, [0112] (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane.

    [0113] The carbon dioxide separation methods mentioned are known per se to the person skilled in the art, who will select a suitable method on the basis of the existing boundary conditions. For example, adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective absorbent is suitable particularly when the carbon dioxide concentration is already very low, for example in the trace region. Absorption methods and membrane separation methods are more suitable for greater concentrations or partial pressures of carbon dioxide. Absorption methods are employable in a particularly favourable manner when the carbon dioxide absorption proceeds rapidly, the absorption capacity of the scrubbing agent is high, the scrubbing agent used is highly selective for carbon dioxide, and the desorption of the carbon dioxide for regeneration of the scrubbing agent is likewise readily possible. This is the case, for example, for chemisorptive amine-based scrubbing agents, for example based on aMDEA.

    [0114] The disadvantage of carbon dioxide separation solely from the synthesis gas is that these streams contribute only 55% to 65% of direct CO.sub.2 emissions, and that the separation rate with these units alone therefore cannot exceed about 60%. Moreover, the separation of carbon dioxide from the synthesis gas also has the effect that enthalpy is removed from the steam reforming plant, and the supply of heat to the reformer furnace is reduced, with the result that steam production is reduced.

    [0115] FIG. 4 shows a first example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the invention for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas and the reformer furnace flue gas. The constituents of the process and of the plant and the function and properties thereof correspond to those of FIGS. 1 to 3 with the same reference numerals.

    [0116] Compared to FIG. 1, FIG. 4 has an additional carbon dioxide separation apparatus 90 (second carbon dioxide separation apparatus) that serves to separate carbon dioxide from the flue gas and which is fed with the steam reforming flue gas stream via conduit 33. The carbon dioxide separation is effected here, for example, by means of one or more of the carbon dioxide separation methods specified below: [0117] (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective chemical absorbent, [0118] (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, [0119] (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane, [0120] (d) cryogenic carbon dioxide capture.

    [0121] The steam reforming flue gas that enters the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus has a comparatively low partial carbon dioxide pressure at this point in the process, for example by comparison with the partial carbon dioxide pressure in the converted synthesis gas stream. This makes it more difficult to separate the carbon dioxide, and large flue gas streams have to be treated. Therefore, chemisorptive methods of carbon dioxide separation are of better suitability here than physisorptive methods, since the latter work better at high partial carbon dioxide pressures. By contrast, methods of good suitability for carbon dioxide removal at low partial carbon dioxide pressures are, in particular, adsorption and cryogenic carbon dioxide capture, the latter being understood to mean a process as described in the above-discussed article by D. Pichot et al.

    [0122] Compared to FIG. 1, FIG. 4 also has an additional carbon dioxide separation apparatus 70 (first carbon dioxide separation apparatus) that serves to separate carbon dioxide from the cooled converted synthesis gas stream, which is supplied via conduit 62 and fed into it. The separation of carbon dioxide from the cooled converted synthesis gas stream is effected here, for example, by means of one or more of the carbon dioxide separation methods specified below: [0123] (a) absorption with a carbon dioxide-selective physical or chemical absorbent, [0124] (b) adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent, [0125] (c) membrane separation with a carbon dioxide-selective membrane.

    [0126] The carbon dioxide separation methods mentioned are known per se to the person skilled in the art, who will select a suitable method on the basis of the existing boundary conditions. For example, adsorption with a carbon dioxide-selective adsorbent is suitable particularly when the carbon dioxide concentration is already very low, for example in the trace region. Absorption methods and membrane separation methods are more suitable for greater concentrations or partial pressures of carbon dioxide. Absorption methods are employable in a particularly favourable manner when the carbon dioxide absorption proceeds rapidly, the absorption capacity of the scrubbing agent is high, the scrubbing agent used is highly selective for carbon dioxide, and the desorption of the carbon dioxide for regeneration of the scrubbing agent is likewise readily possible. This is the case, for example, for chemisorptive amine-based scrubbing agents, for example based on aMDEA.

    [0127] Particularly advantageous configurations of the process or of the plant according to the invention are integrated configurations that are not shown pictorially, in which the first and/or the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus(es) work(s) by a physical or chemical absorption method or an adsorption method or combinations of these methods and is used for thermal regeneration of the laden absorbents or adsorbents used for one or more hot process streams, for example as part of the hot synthesis gas stream or part of the hot flue gas stream, preferably part of the hot synthesis gas stream. In this way, it is possible to dispense with at least some of the heating steam typically used for thermal regeneration, such that the energy efficiency of the process or of the plant is further improved, and the ratio of steam produced to steam consumed is also improved. For example, the regeneration portion of a first carbon dioxide separation apparatus that works on the basis of chemisorption with aMDEA-containing scrubbing agents can be heated with at least a portion of the hot converted synthesis gas stream, which is itself cooled thereby. For this purpose, the at least one portion of hot converted synthesis gas stream can be utilized as a heat source in the boiler of a desorption column in the regeneration section of the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus.

    [0128] Further cooling of the converted synthesis gas stream can be effected, for example, by indirect heat exchange with cold process media, for example the carbon dioxide feed gas stream. In this way, moreover, it is possible to preheat and/or evaporate fresh water, for example demineralized water, or process condensate obtained in the process, in order to assist the raising of steam. This makes it possible to dispense with complex cooling apparatuses, for example air coolers, or to use these with a smaller configuration. The energy efficiency of the overall process is thus improved further.

    [0129] A further or alternative heat source that can be used for preheating of cold process media and/or for raising of steam from fresh water and/or process condensate may also be the enthalpy content of the hot steam reforming flue gas. In addition, it is possible to use either a hot process stream, for example the converted synthesis gas stream or the hot steam reforming flue gas stream, for thermal degassing of aqueous media in a degassing apparatus (deaerator). In this way too, the energy efficiency of the overall process is improved further.

    [0130] The first carbon dioxide separation apparatus 70 and the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus 90 interact in an advantageous manner especially when the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured and operated such that at least 40%, preferably at least 50%, of the direct carbon dioxide emissions from the overall process are separated therein, and in that second carbon dioxide separation apparatus is configured and operated such that the overall degree of separation of the direct carbon dioxide emissions from the overall process is at least 89%. Studies show that a particularly energy-efficient process is obtained in this configuration. This exploits the fact that the converted synthesis gas stream that enters the first carbon dioxide separation apparatus has a higher pressure compared to the flue gas stream, for example 20 to 35 bara, 25 bara in one example, compared to atmospheric or a slightly higher pressure, for example 1.1 bara, in the flue gas. This facilitates the separation of carbon dioxide since the partial carbon dioxide pressure is higher than that in the flue gas, such that the separation of carbon dioxide, for example by means of absorption, adsorption or membrane separation, is assisted and the apparatuses required for the purpose can have a smaller configuration. Further carbon dioxide can then be removed in a simple manner from the steam reforming flue gas by means of the second carbon dioxide separation apparatus.

    [0131] FIG. 5 shows a second example of a steam reforming process or a corresponding plant according to the invention for producing pure hydrogen by means of steam reforming and with carbon dioxide removal from the crude synthesis gas and the reformer furnace flue gas. The constituents of the process and of the plant and the function and properties thereof correspond to those of FIGS. 1 to 4 with the same reference numerals. This is again an integrated configuration of the process or plant.

    [0132] Compared to FIG. 4, the change apparent is that the second heat recovery apparatus 60 is dispensed with since the CO conversion plant and the second heat recovery apparatus coincide in terms of construction and/or function. This can be effected, for example, in such a way that the converted gas stream, before it exits from the CO conversion plant, can be cooled by indirect heat exchange with heat exchangers integrated into the CO2 conversion plant that are provided for the purpose with sufficient effectiveness that it is possible to dispense with a separate second heat recovery apparatus. Coolant streams used may especially be the fluid streams discussed with the fourth aspect of the invention. This saves installation space, minimizes energy losses in the conduits, and dispenses with the second heat recovery apparatus as a second piece of equipment. These measures further improve the energy efficiency of the process.

    [0133] In a further development of the last configuration discussed, the CO conversion plant comprises multiple stages that are operated at decreasing temperature in flow direction of the synthesis gas, i.e., for example, a high-temperature (HTS), medium-temperature (MTS) or low-temperature (LTS) shift or conversion. In a further example, it is also possible for just two of the process stages mentioned to be included. In one example, the crude synthesis gas is cooled down to a temperature in the range from 180?? C. to 220? C., before it is guided into an isothermal or cooled low-temperature shift (LTS) or medium-temperature shift (MTS) reactor which is designed as a heat exchange reactor in which the exothermic water-gas shift reaction (CO conversion) takes place and the converted synthesis gas is simultaneously cooled by a stream at suitable temperature, for example a hydrocarbon feed gas stream, boiler feed water, PSA tail gas, or a combination of such streams. The cooled converted synthesis gas then exits from the CO conversion plant at a temperature low enough to guide it directly as heating medium into the boiler of the regeneration section of the first and second carbon dioxide separation apparatuses, which are configured as an amine scrub in one example. In one example, upstream of the inlet of the heating medium into the boiler of the regeneration section, it is additionally possible to provide a quench cooler in order to control the temperature at the boiler inlet such that the heating medium temperature does not exceed a particular threshold in order to prevent thermal breakdown of the amine solution used as absorbent.

    [0134] The better utilization of heat in the integrated configurations leads to a lower ratio of steam consumption to steam production in the steam reforming plant. This simultaneously improves the overall degree of carbon dioxide separation if indirect emissions are also taken into account, which are dispensed with, for example, via the reduction in heating steam required. Also dispensed with our costly equipment items that have a high space demand for installation, for example air coolers.

    [0135] The table which follows compares, for a steam reforming plant (SMR) with fixed hydrogen production, various cases of operation according to the invention (cases 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g) with operation without carbon dioxide separation (case 5a, prior art) or carbon dioxide separation solely from the steam reforming flue gas (case 5b, prior art).

    Table Elucidations

    [0136] CS: Carbon dioxide separation/carbon dioxide separation apparatus.

    [0137] Cases 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g: First carbon dioxide separation plant as aMDEA scrub, second carbon dioxide separation plant as amine scrub.

    [0138] Cases 5f, 5g: First carbon dioxide separation plant as 2-stage absorber with aMDEA scrub, second carbon dioxide separation plant as amine scrub.

    Parameter Definitions

    [0139] CO.sub.2 separation level: Direct emissions only (%) (2):

    [0140] Amount of CO.sub.2 separated based on sum total of (amount of CO.sub.2 separated+amount of CO.sub.2 emitted):

    [0141] CO.sub.2 capture rate (on case x) [in %]=(CO.sub.2 captured (on case x))/(CO.sub.2 captured (on case x)+CO.sub.2 emitted (on case x))

    CO.sub.2 separation level: Direct+indirect emissions+steam credit (%) (9):

    [0142] Amount of CO.sub.2 separated based on sum total of (amount of CO.sub.2 separated+indirect CO.sub.2 emission for steam raising+indirect CO.sub.2 emission for power generation+credit for steam as CO.sub.2 equivalent).

    Specific steam consumption (kg of steam/kg of CO.sub.2 separated) (3):

    [0143] Steam consumption from first+second CS based on amount of CO.sub.2 separated:

    [0144] specific steam consumption [(kg steam)/(kg CO.sub.2 captured)]=(steam consumption of CC unit 1 (syngas)+steam consumption of CC unit 2 (flue gas))/(CO2 captured by CC unit 1+CO2 captured by CC unit 2)

    Specific indirect emissions (kg of CO.sub.2eq/kg of CO.sub.2 separated):

    [0145] Indirect emissions for first+second CS for steam raising and power generation as a CO2 equivalent, based on amount of CO.sub.2 separated.

    TABLE-US-00001 Case 5f: Case 5g: Case 5a: Case 5b: Case 5c: Case 5d: Case 5e: CS from syngas CS from syngas SMR CS from CS from syngas CS from syngas CS from syngas (2-stage) and (2-stage) and without flue and flue gas, and flue gas, and flue gas, flue gas, not flue gas, CS gas only not integr., 90% integrated, 90% integrated, 75% integr., 90% integrated, 90% (FIG. 1) (FIG. 2) CO2 separation CO2 separation CO2 separation CO2 separation CO2 separation (compar- (compar- (FIG. 4) (FIG. 4/5) (FIG. 4/5) (FIG. 4) (FIG. 4/5) ison) ison) (invention) (invention) (invention) (invention) (invention) H2 production (m3 STP)/h) 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 100000 Natural gass feed (kmol/h) 1483 1483 1483 1483 1483 1483 1483 Total natural gas (kmol/h) 1876 1876 1750 1747 1747 1753 1754 SMR steam export (kg/h) 100286 100286 60097 61123 61123 60105 61027 SMR power 2202 2202 1791 1726 1726 1753 1753 consumption (KW) Steam consumption (kg/h) 0 57542 34102 34102 26566 2858 of first CS Power consumption (kW) 0 5501 5419 5419 5485 5434 offirst CS Steam consumtion (kg/h) 107561 39883 40319 33599 39883 40319 of second CS Power consumption (kW) 9784 3628 3668 3056 3628 3668 of second CS CO2 separation level: 90.0% 95.8% 96.0% 89.9% 95.8% 96.0% Direct emissions only (%) (2) CO2 separation level: 83.6% 82.9% 87.9% 84.0% 89.3% 95.0% direct + indirect em. + steam credit (%) (9) Spec. steam consumption 1.34 1.22 0.93 0.90 0.83 0.54 (kg steam/kg CO2 separated) (3) Spec. indirect emissions 0.36 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.18 (kg CO2 eq/kg CO2 separated Ratio of steam consumption 1.07 1.62 1.22 1.11 1.11 0.71 to steam production (kg/kg)

    LIST OF REFERENCE SYMBOLS

    [0146] [10] hydrodesulfurization reactor [0147] [11] conduit [0148] [20] prereforming reactor [0149] [21] conduit [0150] [30] main reforming stage [0151] [31] conduit [0152] [32] conduit [0153] [40] first heat recovery apparatus [0154] [41] conduit [0155] [50] CO conversion plant [0156] [51] conduit [0157] [60] second heat recovery apparatus [0158] [61] conduit [0159] [62] conduit [0160] [70] first carbon dioxide separation apparatus [0161] [71] conduit [0162] [72] conduit [0163] [80] hydrogen enrichment apparatus [0164] [81] conduit [0165] [83] conduit [0166] [90] second carbon dioxide separation apparatus [0167] [91] conduit [0168] [92] conduit

    [0169] It will be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described in order to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments in the examples given above.