Material made of uranium, gadolinium and oxygen and use thereof as consumable neutron poison
10062459 · 2018-08-28
Assignee
Inventors
- Dario Pieck (Aix en Provence, FR)
- Lionel Desgranges (Pertuis, FR)
- Pierre Matheron (Manosque, FR)
- Yves Pontillon (Pierrevert, FR)
Cpc classification
C01P2004/82
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02E30/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C01P2002/76
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
G21C3/326
PHYSICS
C01P2006/88
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a novel material made of uranium, gadolinium and oxygen, having a crystalline phase having cubic crystallographic structure, having an atomic ratio Gd/[Gd+U] of 0.6 to 0.93, the uranium being present in an oxidation state of +IV and/or +V. The invention further relates to the use of such a material as a consumable neutron poison of a fuel element.
Claims
1. A material consisting of uranium (U), gadolinium (Gd) and oxygen (O) exhibiting a crystalline phase with a crystallographic structure of cubic type, with a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio between 0.6 and 0.93, the uranium being present therein in the +IV and/or +V oxidation state.
2. The material as claimed in claim 1, exhibiting a crystalline phase referred to as cubic 1 phase, the Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio of which is between 0.79 and 0.93.
3. The material as claimed in claim 2, in which the crystallographic structure of cubic type exhibits a unit cell parameter between 10.8 and 10.9 .
4. The material as claimed in claim 1, exhibiting a crystalline phase referred to as cubic 2 phase, the Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio of which is between 0.6 and 0.71.
5. The material as claimed in claim 4, in which the crystallographic structure of cubic type exhibits a unit cell parameter between 5.3 and 5.5 .
6. The material as claimed in claim 1 of two-phase type, exhibiting (i) a cubic 1 phase, the Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio of which is between 0.79 and 0.93, and (ii) a cubic 2 phase, the Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio of which is between 0.6 and 0.71.
7. The material as claimed in claim 1, in which the uranium is uranium isotopically enriched in .sup.235U, uranium isotopically depleted in .sup.235U or natural uranium.
8. The material as claimed in claim 1, in which the gadolinium is natural gadolinium or gadolinium isotopically modified in its .sup.155Gd/Gd.sub.total and/or .sup.157Gd/Gd.sub.total ratio.
9. A process for the preparation of a material defined according to claim 1, comprising a stage of sintering, at a temperature ranging from 1200 to 2200 C. and under a reducing atmosphere, a powder formed of a mixture of uranium oxide and gadolinium oxide Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 in proportions such that the gadolinium is present in a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio ranging from 0.6 to 0.93.
10. The process as claimed in claim 9, in which the sintering is carried out under an argon atmosphere to which 5 mol % of hydrogen has been added.
11. The process as claimed in claim 9, in which the sintering is carried out for a period of time of greater than or equal to 1 hour.
12. A burnable neutron poison of a nuclear fuel element, which comprises the material as claimed in claim 1.
13. A nuclear fuel pellet, comprising a material as defined according to claim 1.
14. A nuclear fuel rod comprising at least one fuel pellet as defined according to claim 13.
15. A nuclear fuel assembly comprising at least one fuel rod as defined in claim 14.
16. A heterogeneous nuclear fuel pellet formed of at least an internal part comprising at least one fissile material, the internal part being coated with an annular external part that is formed in whole or part of a material as defined according to claim 1.
17. The pellet as claimed in claim 16, in which said annular external part exhibits a thickness ranging from 0.05 to 7.5% of the radius of said pellet.
18. The pellet as claimed in claim 16, in which said internal part is formed in whole or part of uranium oxide, plutonium oxide, thorium oxide or their mixtures.
19. A process for manufacturing a heterogeneous nuclear fuel pellet defined according to claim 16, comprising at least the following steps: (i) providing a powder comprising a material based on uranium (U), gadolinium (Gd) and oxygen (O) exhibiting a crystalline phase with a crystallographic structure of cubic type, with a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio between 0.6 and 0.93, the uranium being present therein in the +IV and/or +V oxidation state; or providing a powder formed of a mixture of uranium oxide and gadolinium oxide Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 in proportions such that the gadolinium is present in a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio ranging from 0.6 to 0.93; (ii) preparing a slip from the powder of stage (i); (iii) depositing the powder in the slip form on the surface of a pellet comprising at least one fissile material; and (iv) sintering the pellet obtained on conclusion of stage (iii) under a reducing atmosphere and at a temperature between 1200 C. and 2200 C.
20. The process as claimed in claim 19, in which stage (iii) includes the drying of the slip layer deposited at the surface of the pellet.
21. A nuclear fuel element of plate-type geometry comprising one or more fissile regions covered, at least in part, with a material as defined according to claim 1.
Description
FIGURES
(1)
(2) For the purposes of clarity, the various elements in
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
EXAMPLES
Example 1
(14) Preparation of a Material According to the Invention
(15) Different mixed powders formed of a mixture of UO.sub.2 and Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 with a content by weight of Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 varying from 50% to 90% (for example: 55%, 65%, 69%, 80%, 82.4%) are compacted and then sintered under a reducing atmosphere of Ar, 5% H.sub.2, at 1700 C. for 4 hours, in order to give dense pellets.
(16) The results of the analyses, by X-ray diffraction, SEM and energy dispersive analysis (EDS), of the pellets thus obtained are presented in table 1 below.
(17) Crystalline phases with a crystallographic structure of cubic type are detected in the pellets thus obtained and more particularly: a crystallographic structure of cubic type with a unit cell parameter of approximately 5.43 , entitled cubic 2 (C2) phase, for a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio between 0.5 and 0.71; a crystallographic structure of cubic type with a unit cell parameter of approximately 10.8 , entitled cubic 1 (C1) phase, for a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio between 0.79 and 0.93; and a region of phase separation of these two phases for a Gd/[Gd+U] atomic ratio between 0.71 and 0.79.
(18) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Powders 1 2 3 4 5 Content by weight (%) of 55 65 69 80 82.4 the starting power Gd.sub.2O.sub.3/(Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 + UO.sub.2) Z (Gd/(Gd + U)) atomic 0.66 0.74 0.75 0.85 0.87 ratio of the starting powder Crystallographic structure cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic C2 C2 and C2 and C1 C1 C1 two- C1 two- phase phase Unit cell parameter () .sup.(1) ~5.43 mixed mixed ~10.86 ~10.85 Oxidation state of the +4/+5 +4/+5 +4/+5 +4/+5 +4/+5 uranium State solid solid solid solid solid .sup.(1) obtained by X-ray diffraction analysis
Example 2
(19) Preparation of a Fuel Pellet According to the Invention by Pressing Powders
(20) (i) Powder of Material According to the Invention
(21) A powder of material according to the invention is prepared, as described in example 1, by sintering a mixture of UO.sub.2 and Gd.sub.2O.sub.3, in a Gd.sub.2O.sub.3/(UO.sub.2+Gd.sub.2O.sub.3) ratio by weight of 80%, at 1700 C. and under a reducing atmosphere of Ar, 5% H.sub.2, for 4 hours.
(22) (ii) Preparation of the Heterogeneous Pellet
(23) A pellet is molded according to the structure presented in
(24) The cylindrical core exhibits a radius (R.sub.1) of approximately 4 mm; the annular external part exhibits a thickness (e) of approximately 50 to 250 m as a function of the supply of negative reactivity desired.
(25) The pellet is subsequently sintered under reducing conditions with an atmosphere of Ar, 5% H.sub.2, for 4 hours.
Example 3
(26) Preparation of a Fuel Pellet According to the Invention by Deposition of a Layer Formed of a Powder Having a High Content of Gd
(27) (i) Powder of Material
(28) Two possibilities are selected:
(29) AA powder of material according to the invention is prepared, as described in example 1, by sintering a mixture of UO.sub.2 (indeed even of U.sub.3O.sub.8) and Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 in a Gd.sub.2O.sub.3/(UO.sub.2+Gd.sub.2O.sub.3) ratio by weight of 80%.
(30) BA powder is prepared by mixing UO.sub.2 (indeed even U.sub.3O.sub.8) and Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 in a Gd.sub.2O.sub.3/(UO.sub.2+Gd.sub.2O.sub.3) ratio by weight of 80%.
(31) (ii) Preparation of the Heterogeneous Pellet
(32) A pellet composed of fissile materials (1) is shaped by compaction with a cylindrical geometry.
(33) In order to give cohesion of the powder, presintering of this pellet may be carried out.
(34) An annular external part formed from the powder enriched in gadolinium, obtained in stage (i) according to mode A or mode B, is deposited, for example in the form of a slip (formed from the powder and ethanol), on the cylindrical surface and then the slip is dried.
(35) The pellet is subsequently sintered under reducing conditions with an atmosphere of Ar, 5% (molar) H.sub.2, for 4 hours.
(36) The cylindrical core, with fissile/fertile elements, exhibits a radius of approximately 4 mm; the annular external part, with the gadolinium, exhibits a thickness of approximately 30 to 250 m as a function of the supply of negative reactivity desired.
(37)
Example 4
(38) Use of a Material According to the Invention as Burnable Poison in Nuclear Reactors for the Supply of Negative Reactivity and/or for the Reduction/Suppression of the Requirements for Boron and Other Neutron Poisons/Absorbing Materials
(39) The neutron performance of different 1717 assemblies of nuclear fuel is modeled using the APOLLO2 computing code.
(40) i. Principles and Definitions of the Notions Used K.sub.infini: multiplication factor of the neutrons in an infinite medium (without taking into account the escapes); K.sub.true: multiplication factor of the neutrons in a finite (true) medium.
(41) The difference between K.sub.infini and K.sub.true is thus related to the amount of neutrons which escape from the reactor, without multiplying, in other words:
K.sub.inifini=K.sub.truefactor.sub.geometric(Eq. 1)
(42) the factor.sub.geometric depending mainly on the geometry of the core but also on the nature of the materials. The reactivity , expressed in pcm (percent mille), is another way of expressing the multiplication factor (infinite or true) mathematically,
(43)
(44) Thus, equation 1 may be expressed as:
.sub.inf=.sub.true+.sub.escapes(Eq. 3)
(45) Critical Reactor
(46) A critical reactor is a reactor in which the population of neutrons is constant and different from zero (without taking into account external sources), in other words a reactor for which K.sub.true=1.00, or, expressed in terms of reactivity, by employing equation 2, =0 pcm.
(47) The calculations carried out with the abovementioned computing code give us the K.sub.infini. It is found that, for the imaginary reactor, the term .sub.escapes is approximately 2500 pcm.
(48) Thus, a critical reactor within the meaning of the modelings carried out exhibits: .sub.true=0 pcm and .sub.infini=2500 pcm; which is reflected, in multiplication factor, by: K.sub.true=1.00 and K.sub.infini=1.025 (curve 7 in
(49) It is compared with the reactivity of the same reactor using boron (curve 5) as neutron poison (2000 ppm of boron diluted in the water of the heat-exchange fluid). In the case of the use of boron, the reactor may remain critical starting from the operating point (6) by decreasing the concentration of boron in the heat-exchange fluid (critical boron operating method).
(50) Multiplication Factor of an Ideal Reactor
(51) Curve 2 on the graph of
(52) Thus, as represented in
(53) Multiplication Factor of an Ideal Assembly
(54)
(55) The relationship between the change in the K.sub.infini of an assembly (K.sub.assembly.sup.inf) and the change in the K.sub.infini of a reactor (K.sub.core.sup.inf), with management of N cycles, is given by the approximation below:
(56)
with:
x the burnup of the assemblies in the 1.sup.st cycle,
N the total number of cycles that the assemblies are used in the reactor,
K.sub.core.sup.inf(x) the K.sub.infini of a reactor, with management at N cycles, as a function of the burnup x,
K.sub.assembly.sup.inf(x+L.sub.cyclei) the K.sub.infini of an assembly, as a function of a burnup,
L.sub.cycle the length of a cycle (in burnup units). In particular, L.sub.cycle confirms that K.sub.core.sup.inf(L.sub.cycle)=1.025, in order for the reactor to be critical at the end of the cycle.
(57) By employing equation 4, it is possible to plot (
(58) ii. Neutron Effect Obtained with Different Assemblies
(59) The change in the K.sub.infini for various 1717 assemblies are presented in
(60) All these curves consider a boron-free imaginary reactor, that is to say a concentration of 0.0 ppm of boron in the heat-exchange fluid/moderator.
(61) For comparative purposes, the neutron effect obtained for assemblies incorporating rods of conventional homogeneous pellets composed of a (U,Gd)O.sub.2 solid solution comprising 8% by weight of Gd.sub.2O.sub.3 is presented in
(62) It emerges from
(63) Also, the comparison of
(64) iii. Reactivity of the Reactor
(65) The behavior of a reactor employing the assemblies of the invention is shown in
(66) It emerges from
REFERENCES
(67) [1] Balestrieri thesis, 1995; [2] Tang and al., Order-to-disorder phase transformation in ion irradiated uranium-bearing delta-phase oxides RE.sub.6U.sub.1O.sub.12 (RE=Y, Gd, Ho, Yb, and Lu), Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 183(4), 844-848; [3] Tang and al., Microstructural evolution in irradiated uranium-bearing delta-phase oxides A.sub.6U.sub.1O.sub.12 (A=Y, Gd, Ho, Yb, and Lu), Journal of Nuclear Materials, 407(1), 44-47.