Nickel-iron-phosphorus brazing alloys

Abstract

Disclosed is a semi-amorphous, ductile brazing foil with a composition consisting essentially of Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with approximately 30 atomic percentaapproximately 38 atomic percent; approximately 10 atomic percentbapproximately 20 atomic percent; approximately 7 atomic percentcapproximately 20 atomic percent; approximately 2 atomic percentdapproximately 4 atomic percent; eapproximately 2 atomic percent; fapproximately 5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<approximately 16 atomic percent.

Claims

1. A brazing foil of an amorphous or semi-amorphous alloy consisting essentially of Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with 30 atomic percenta38 atomic percent; 10 atomic percentb20 atomic percent; 7 atomic percentc10 atomic percent; 2 atomic percentd4 atomic percent; e2 atomic percent; f5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<16 atomic percent, wherein the alloy is brazed at a temperature of less than 1100 C.

2. The foil of claim 1, wherein 9 atomic percentc10 atomic percent and f1 atomic percent.

3. A brazed metal device, comprising: a first metal component; a brazing foil; and a second metal component; wherein the brazing foil consists essentially of Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with 30 atomic percenta38 atomic percent; 10 atomic percentb20 atomic percent; 7 atomic percentc10 atomic percent; 2 atomic percentd4 atomic percent; e2 atomic percent; f5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<16 atomic percent, wherein the brazing foil and the first and second metal components are brazed at a temperature less than 1100 C.

4. A method of manufacturing a brazed metal device, comprising: placing the brazing foil of claim 1 between first and second metal components; and heating the brazing foil and first and second metal components in a belt furnace.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the furnace temperature is below 1100 C.

6. A brazed metallic component, comprising: a first sheet of metal; a brazing foil; and a second sheet of metal; wherein the brazing foil consists essentially of Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with 30 atomic percenta38 atomic percent; 10 atomic percentb20 atomic percent; 7 atomic percentc10 atomic percent; 2 atomic percentd4 atomic percent; e2 atomic percent; f5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<16 atomic percent, wherein the brazing foil and the first and second sheets of metal are brazed at a temperature less than 1100 C.

7. A heat exchanger comprising: a first sheet of metal; a brazing foil; and a second sheet of metal; wherein the brazing foil consists essentially of Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with 30 atomic percenta38 atomic percent; 10 atomic percentb20 atomic percent; 7 atomic percentc10 atomic percent; 2 atomic percentd4 atomic percent; e2 atomic percent; f5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<16 atomic percent, wherein the brazing foil and the first and second sheets of metal are brazed at a temperature less than 1100 C.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The invention will be more fully understood and further advantages will become apparent when reference is made to the following detailed description of the embodiments and the accompanying drawing in which:

(2) FIG. 1 illustrates a differential thermal analysis (DTA) scan with temperature on the horizontal axis and heat on the vertical axis. T.sub.s and T.sub.l represent the solidus and liquidus temperature, respectively. The alloy ribbon on which the DTA scan was made is Alloy 1 of Table 1.

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates an X-ray diffraction (XRD) scan with X-ray angle on the horizontal axis and X-ray intensity on the vertical axis taken on Alloy 1 of Table 1. The scan shows a small crystalline peak at about Two Theta of 44.8 degrees on a broad amorphous diffraction pattern, indicating that Alloy 1 is semi-amorphous containing less than a few percent crystalline phase in the fully amorphous matrix.

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates a brazing foil of an embodiment of the invention sandwiched with two stainless steel sheets

(5) FIG. 4 illustrates an optical microscope image of the local structure in the brazed section between the stainless steel sheets of FIG. 3. The chemical compositions in the representative sections are given in the boxes shown.

(6) FIG. 5 illustrates optical microscope images of the surfaces of (a) as-prepared specimens, (b) specimens after a corrosion test, and (c) specimens cleaned after the corrosion test.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(7) The invention consists of a ductile brazing foil that is produced via melt spinning according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,142,571, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Melt spinning consists of a mass of molten metal being quenched onto a spinning wheel at a rate of 10.sup.6 C. per second in order to form a metastable glassy structure. This results in the invention having an amorphous or semi-amorphous structure giving the invention the ability to be cast very thin (in a preferred range of approximately 25-38 m thick) and in a continuous, fully homogenized ribbon form.

(8) The ability of the foil to be cast in very thin, continuous ribbon form allows production of heat exchangers and other plate-fin type applications to join thin stainless steel sheets together. The benefit of utilizing thin stainless steel sheets in heat exchanger applications is that, for the end user, more media are separated, increasing the exposed surface area, by a larger concentration of channels. This increases the total thermal efficiency of the heat exchanger. However, care must be taken when brazing thin stainless steel sheets due to possible erosion that could occur during brazing, reducing the total thickness of the stainless steel sheets. An advantage of a preferred embodiment is to cast small thickness to reduce the prevalence of erosion during brazing. The thinner sheet also allows the application to reduce weight, which saves cost and increases full economy, if used, e.g., in an automotive-type heat exchanger.

(9) The invention is amorphous or semi-amorphous, ductile brazing foil made from Ni, Fe, Cr, P, and Si and may also include one or more of B and Mo. In a preferred embodiment, the composition of the foil may be expressed as Ni.sub.balFe.sub.aCr.sub.bP.sub.cSi.sub.dB.sub.eMo.sub.f with approximately 30 atomic percentaapproximately 38 atomic percent; approximately 10 atomic percentbapproximately 20 atomic percent; approximately 7 atomic percentcapproximately 20 atomic percent; approximately 2 atomic percentdapproximately 4 atomic percent; eapproximately 2 atomic percent; fapproximately 5 atomic percent; and the balance being Ni and other impurities; where c+d+e<approximately 16 atomic percent.

(10) In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of iron is from about 30 atomic percent to about 38 atomic percent. This concentration reduces the cost of the alloys versus NiCrP alloys and reduces the overall Nickel content to reduce Nickel leaching in potable water applications.

(11) In this preferred embodiment, the concentration of chromium is about 10 atomic percent to about 20 atomic percent. This concentration improves corrosion resistance.

(12) The concentration of metalloids is preferably optimized to be able to produce an amorphous or semi-amorphous foil and allow processing on a belt/continuous furnace. Two examples of this preferred embodiment have the chemical compositions given in Table I below.

(13) In Alloy 1 and 2 the concentration of boron is 2 atomic percent to allow processing of the brazing foil on the same manufacturing lines of NiCrBSi alloys. Other suitable concentrations of boron outside those selected for Alloy 1 and Alloy 2 can, of course, be used.

(14) In this preferred embodiment, phosphorus, which is the major melting temperature depressant, has a concentration between about 9 atomic percent and about 11 atomic percent. This drops the melting temperature of the alloy 31 C. per atomic percent.

(15) In this preferred embodiment, the silicon atomic concentration range is between about 2 atomic percent and about 4 atomic percent, which increases ease of the material's fabrication into amorphous states during foil production and also acts as a melting temperature depressant.

(16) In this preferred embodiment, total metalloid content (boron plus phosphorus plus silicon) is less than about 16 atomic percent. This percent is less than the total found in prior art and acts to minimize the potential for brittle intermetallics to be formed during the brazing process.

(17) In this preferred embodiment, molybdenum is in the range from 0 to about 1 percent, 1 atomic weight percent is added to help increase corrosion resistance and solubility with 316 stainless steel alloys. Other suitable concentrations of molybdenum can, of course, be used.

(18) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Chemical composition examples of the disclosed brazing foil. The solidus and liquidus temperatures determined by DTA of Example 1 are given for each composition. Ni Fe Cr B P Si Other Solidus Liquidus Alloy (At %) (At %) (At %) (At %) (At %) (At %) (At %) ( C.) ( C.) 1 balance 30 16 2 10 3 1 Mo 960 1030 2 balance 33 11 2 10 3 1 Mo 910 1020

(19) Alloys of this preferred embodiment were cast according to the teaching of U.S. Pat. No. 4,142,571 and were utilized as brazing foils as described in Example 1. The brazed section between two stainless steel sheets had metallurgical phases shown in FIG. 4, showing chromium-borides accumulated in the phosphorous-rich phase.

(20) Corrosion testing of the brazed section of Example 1 was conducted as described in Example II. The results are illustrated in FIG. 5, indicating the tests passed the criteria set forth in the industrial standards adopted in the automotive industries.

Example 1

(21) A DTA on an amorphous alloy ribbon having a composition of Ni.sub.38Fe.sub.30Cr.sub.16B.sub.2P.sub.10Si.sub.3 (numbers in atomic percent) was made by a conventional Differential Thermal Analyzer to determine alloy's solidus (T.sub.s) and liquidus (T.sub.l) temperatures. They were found to be T.sub.s=960 C. and T.sub.l=1030 C., which were used to determine the optimal brazing temperature. The DTA scan is shown in FIG. 1. An XRD scan reveals that the ribbon is semi-amorphous (FIG. 2) in the as-cast state. A brazing foil having the composition of Ni.sub.38Fe.sub.30Cr.sub.16B.sub.2P.sub.10Si.sub.3 was placed between two 300 series stainless steel sheets with dimensions of 2.5 cm10.0 cm0.09 cm and 1.9 cm8.9 cm0.09 cm as shown in FIG. 3 and was brazed at a brazing temperature of 1060 C., with a holding time of 15-20 minutes after being heated to the first and second dwell temperatures of 260 C., with a holding time of 20-45 minutes and 960 C. with a holding time of 20-45 minutes. A conventional metallography was used to identify the metallurgical phases appearing in the brazed section between the two stainless steel sheets and an example is shown in FIG. 4, indicating that chromium-borides accumulated in the phosphorous-rich phase.

Example 2

(22) The brazements of Example 1 were cleared with soap and water and solvent degreased with a final rinse in acetone. These cleaned brazements were weighed on an analytical balance to the nearest 0.0001 g, overall measurements of length, width, and thickness of each brazement were made using a caliper with resolution of 0.01 mm. The reagent for corrosion testing was prepared based on the concentration in Table II.

(23) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Test solution reagent and concentration Test Solution Concentration (ppm) Solution pH Cl.sup. 100 8.0 0.2 NO.sub.3.sup. 20 SO.sub.3.sup.2 600 SO.sub.4.sup.2 600 CH.sub.3COO.sup.1 800
Three brazements of Example 1 were corrosion tested following Method B of JASO (Japan Automotive Standards Organization) M611-92E Standard for internal corrosion test method for automotive muffler and three brazements were left unexposed as control specimens. The Method B is a cyclic test and one cycle consists of 5 and 24 hour immersions in an oven at 80 C. followed by a cool down to room temperature and reagent change. After these five immersions, a sixth immersion was completed in an oven at 250 C. for 24 hours. Four total cycles were completed, which equates to exposure at 80 C. for 480 hours and 250 C. for 96 hours. Once the required cycles were completed the brazements were removed and photographed. Loose deposits were removed according to the JASO M611, Section 7.2.2, using a solution of 60% nitric acid at 80 C. for 2 hours, rinsed with d-ionized water and dried. The samples then were weighed on the same analytical balance and overall measurements of length, width, and thickness were repeated. The results were recorded from the JASO M611-92E requirements, each one of each specimen was cross-sectioned, polished and viewed under an optical microscope at 75 and 150 magnification. Some of the results are illustrated in FIGS. 5a, 5b and 5c, where FIG. 5a illustrates the front face of a brazed specimen, FIG. 5b illustrates the specimen surface after exposure to solution reagent, and FIG. 5c illustrates the specimen surface after surface being cleaned.

(24) The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.