Monitoring system for determining the efficacy of a compression device
09968294 ยท 2018-05-15
Assignee
Inventors
- Jens Bichel (Meerbusch, DE)
- Joannes F. H. M. Schuren (The Netherlands, NL)
- Guido Hitschmann (Neuss, DE)
- Martin C. Neuenhahn (Duesseldorf, DE)
Cpc classification
A61B5/0053
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61H9/0078
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/4848
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/0205
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/1123
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/4884
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61H2209/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/4836
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/02007
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B5/103
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/11
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/0205
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
Disclosed is a monitoring system for determining the efficacy of at least one compression device for use in compression therapy. The monitoring system comprises at least one pressure sensor for measuring a pressure exerted onto a body part of a user by the compression device and at least one evaluation unit which is connectable to the pressure sensor. The evaluation unit is adapted to acquire at least one resting pressure p.sub.rest with the user being in a resting position. The evaluation unit is further adapted to determine at least one extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended with the user being in a standing position, by using the following procedure: the evaluation unit acquires a measurement curve of pressure values after a position change of the user into the standing position and a slope of the measurement curve is automatically compared to at least one endpoint threshold value and, depending on a result of the comparison, an endpoint of a change in the measurement curve induced by the position change is automatically detected, and a pressure value acquired at or after the endpoint is assigned to the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended.
Claims
1. A monitoring system for determining the efficacy of a compression therapy device, comprising: at least one pressure sensor; and at least one evaluation unit that is configured to connect with the at least one pressure sensor and that is configured to: receive first data, from the at least one pressure sensor, that represents force exerted by the compression therapy device onto a body part of a user while the user is in a supine position; calculate, from the first data, a first pressure value for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device; receive second data, from the at least one pressure sensor, that represents force exerted by the compression therapy device onto the body part of the user while the user is in a non-supine position; calculate, from the second data, a second pressure value for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device by at least: detecting when the rate of change in the second data is less than or equal to a programmable threshold value; and assigning the second pressure value to a variable defined as an extended standing pressure for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device, wherein the second pressure value is a function of a time at which the rate of change in the second data is less than or equal to the programmable threshold value; and output at least one of an audio cue signal and a visual cue signal that represents efficacy of the compression therapy device responsive to a determination that a relational criterion between the second pressure value and the first pressure value is met.
2. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to acquire pressure values from the at least one pressure sensor responsive to a position change of the user.
3. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to determine at least one key figure K from pressure values provided by the at least one pressure sensor, wherein the at least one key figure K is a factor for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device.
4. The monitoring system according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to compare the at least one key figure K to at least one efficacy threshold for automatically determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device.
5. The monitoring system according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to determine at least two different key figures K.sub.1 and K.sub.2 from pressure values provided by the at least one pressure sensor, and wherein the evaluation unit is configured to automatically determine the efficacy of the compression therapy device from the at least two different key figures K.sub.1 and K.sub.2.
6. The monitoring system according to claim 3, wherein the extended standing pressure is the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing , extended and the key figure is selected from the group consisting of: a resting pressure p.sub.rest; a standing pressure p.sub.standing with the user being in a standing position; a baseline resting pressure p.sub.rest, baseline directly after application of the compression system; the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended; a static stiffness index SSI, the static stiffness index being determined by subtracting the resting pressure p.sub.rest from a standing pressure p.sub.standing; an extended static stiffness index ESSI, the extended static stiffness index being determined by subtracting the resting pressure p.sub.rest from the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended; a difference ESSI.sub.1ESSI.sub.2 between at least two extended static stiffness indices ESSI.sub.1 and ESSI.sub.2, the extended static stiffness index ESSI.sub.1 being determined by subtracting a first resting pressure p.sub.rest1 from a first extended standing pressure p.sub.standing , extended 1, the extended static stiffness index ESSI.sub.2 being determined by subtracting a second resting pressure p.sub.rest2 from a second extended standing pressure p.sub.standing , extended 2; a difference SSI.sub.1SSI.sub.2 between at least two static stiffness indices SSI.sub.1 and SSI.sub.2, the static stiffness index SSI.sub.1being determined by subtracting a first resting pressure p.sub.rest1 from a first standing pressure p.sub.standing1, the static stiffness index SSI.sub.2 being determined by subtracting a second resting pressure p.sub.rest2 from a second standing pressure p.sub.standing2; a ratio ESSI.sub.1: ESSI.sub.2 of at least two extended static stiffness indices ESSI.sub.1 and ESSI.sub.2, the extended static stiffness index ESSI.sub.1 being determined by subtracting a first resting pressure p.sub.rest1 from a first extended standing pressure p.sub.standing , extended 1, the extended static stiffness index ESSI.sub.2 being determined by subtracting a second resting pressure p.sub.rest2 from a second extended standing pressure p.sub.standing , extended 2; a ratio SSI.sub.1:SSI.sub.2 of at least two static stiffness indices SSI.sub.1 and SSI.sub.2, the static stiffness index SSI.sub.1 being determined by subtracting a first resting pressure p.sub.rest1 from a first standing pressure p.sub.standing1, the static stiffness index SSI.sub.2 being determined by subtracting a second resting pressure p.sub.rest2 from a second standing pressure p.sub.standing2; a difference between at least two resting pressures p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.rest2 acquired at at least two different points in time; a ratio between at least two resting pressures p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.rest2 acquired at at least two different points in time; a difference between at least two extended standing pressures p.sub.standing , extended 1 and p.sub.standing, extended 2 acquired at at least two different points in time; a difference between at least two standing pressures and p.sub.standing1 and p.sub.standing2 acquired at at least two different points in time; a ratio of at least two extended standing pressures p.sub.standing , extended 1 and p.sub.standing , extended 2acquired at at least two different points in time; a ratio of at least two standing pressures p.sub.standing1 and p.sub.standing2 acquired at at least two different points in time; a median or mean amplitude of a measurement curve of pressure values acquired during a defined movement of the user; a ratio of at least one first median or mean amplitude (Amplitude.sub.median1 or Amplitude.sub.mean1) of a first measurement curve of pressure values acquired during a first defined movement of the user and at least one second median or mean amplitude (Amplitude.sub.median2 or Amplitude.sub.mean2) of a second measurement curve of pressure values acquired during a second defined movement of the user; a refilling time t.sub.refill for vein refilling after a change of position from a resting position into a standing position; a difference t.sub.refill1t.sub.refill2 between at least one first refilling time t.sub.refill1 for vein refilling after a first change of position from a resting position into a standing position and at least one second refilling time t.sub.refill2 for vein refilling after a first change of position from a resting position into a standing position; a ratio t.sub.refill1:t.sub.refill2 of at least one first refilling time t.sub.refill1 for vein refilling after a first change of position from a resting position into a standing position and at least one second refilling time t.sub.refill2 for vein refilling after a first change of position from a resting position into a standing position; a parameter derived from a refilling curve, the refilling curve being a measurement curve acquired after a change of position from a resting position into a standing position, specifically a parameter indicating at least one of a slope of the refilling curve and a shape of the refilling curve.
7. The monitoring system according to claim 3, wherein the at least one of the audio cue signal and the visual cue signal represents a warning that the at least one key figure K is outside an admissible range.
8. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the monitoring system is configured to prompt the user through at least one measurement routine.
9. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to recognize at least one predetermined type of movement of the user by evaluating a measurement curve of pressure values.
10. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to store an activity profile of the user.
11. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one pressure sensor is selected from the group consisting of: a semiconductor pressure sensor; a pressure sensor having a deformation-sensitive resistor; a pressure sensor having a deformation-sensitive capacitor; a pressure sensor having a deformation-sensitive light guide; and a pressure sensor having a fluid-filled bladder.
12. The monitoring system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to detect arterial pulsations in a measurement curve of pressure values provided by the at least one pressure sensor.
13. A method for determining the efficacy of a compression therapy device by an evaluation unit that is configured to connect with at least one pressure sensor, comprising: receiving first data, from the at least one pressure sensor, that represents force exerted by the compression therapy device onto a body part of a user while the user is in a supine position; calculating, from the first data, a first pressure value for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device; receiving second data, from the at least one pressure sensor, that represents force exerted by the compression therapy device onto the body part of the user while the user is in a non-supine position; calculating, from the second data, a second pressure value for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device by at least: detecting when the rate of change in the second data is less than or equal to a programmable threshold value; and assigning the second pressure value to a variable defined as an extended standing pressure for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device, wherein the second pressure value is a function of a time at which rate of change in the second data is less than or equal to a programmable threshold value; and outputting at least one of an audio cue signal and a visual cue signal that represents efficacy of the compression therapy device responsive to a determination that a relational criterion between the second pressure value and the first pressure value is met.
14. The method according to claim 13, further comprising determining at least one key figure K from pressure values provided by the pressure sensor, wherein the at least one key figure is a factor for determining the efficacy of the compression therapy device.
15. The method according to claim 13, further comprising generating the at least one of the audio cue signal and the visual cue signal to exhibit a characteristic that represents an instruction to exchange the compression therapy device.
Description
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) Further details of the invention may be derived from the following disclosure of preferred embodiments.
(2) The features of the embodiments may be realized in an isolated way or in any combination. The invention is not restricted to the embodiments. The embodiments are schematically depicted in the figures. Identical reference numbers in the figures refer to identical elements or functionally identical elements or elements corresponding to each other with regard to their functions.
(3) In the figures:
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(13) In
(14) As shown in
(15) Sensing unit 117 may comprises a pressure sensor 118 for measuring a pressure exerted onto the body part 114 by the compression device 112 as shown in exemplary embodiment of
(16) The evaluation unit 126 preferably may comprise one or more processors 128, such as one or more microprocessors. Additionally, the evaluation unit 126 may comprise one or more data storage devices 129, such as one or more volatile and/or non-volatile data storage devices.
(17) The evaluation unit 126 may further comprise one or more user interfaces and/or one or more electronic interfaces, such as one or more data interfaces. Thus, as indicated in
(18) The evaluation unit 126 preferably is adapted to perform a method for determining the efficacy of the compression device 112. As outlined above, the evaluation unit 126 is adapted to acquire at least one resting pressure p.sub.rest with the user being in a resting position. The evaluation unit 126 is further adapted to determine at least one extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended with the user being in a standing position, by using the following procedure: the evaluation unit 112 acquires a measurement curve of pressure values after a position change of the user into the standing position; a slope of the measurement curve is automatically compared to at least one endpoint threshold value and, depending on a result of the comparison, an endpoint of a change in the measurement curve induced by the position change is automatically detected, and a pressure value acquired at or after the endpoint is assigned to the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended.
(19) In the following, several embodiments of the method are disclosed which are suited to assess if the compression system 110 and, specifically, the compression device 112, are effective. Initial efficacy may be measured directly after application of the compression system 110 (baseline measurement).
(20) In the following, pressures, key figures or time-related data determined during initial measurement will be indexed with a 1. The system may store baseline measurements of a patient together with user-specific information, such as a specific RFID ID-code assigned to the compression device 112 and/or the pressure sensor 118.
(21) After hours or days it may be expected that compression properties of the compression device 112 change, potentially resulting in therapeutically inefficacy. Time, pressure data and key figures determined after some time of wearing will be indexed with a 2. Via RFID ID-code one or more consecutive values may be compared with baseline data.
(22) According to current medical standard, typically, sub-bandage pressures and key figures are used as a surrogate marker for bandage efficacy, also called bandage efficacy. However, these pressure values are measured manually. That means the therapist decides at which exact time the resting or standing pressure is measured. However, values like the standing pressure show significant changes over time of assessment. Also, uneven pressure curves will not be smoothened, nor are there any automatic calculations of mean or average values to increase reproducibility. In contrary, algorithms allow appropriate detection e.g. for resting pressures or dynamic changes like pressure amplitudes.
(23) Several methods to measure compression efficacy will be proposed in the following. Beside the measurement of efficacy of the compression device 112, such as the compression bandage, also other parameters like venous refilling time (section B) or safety of the bandage (section A and E) can be measured by the compression system 110 and, specifically, by the monitoring system 116.
(24) Besides assessing of the compression system 110 and, specifically, the compression device 112, within predetermined time intervals, e.g. clinical visits or daily nursing service, efficacy can also be assessed continuously.
(25) Several assessments can be done to judge efficacy or safety over the time of compression application. This continuous measurement can be done in the domestic environment or during normal activity of the user, also referred to as the patient. Further description is outlined under G-K.
(26) A.) Measurement of the Resting Pressure p.sub.rest
(27) A first version of measuring the efficacy of the compression system 110, specifically of the compression device 112, is a measurement of the resting pressure p.sub.rest. The resting pressure p.sub.rest describes the forces which are built up only by the compression system 110. The resting pressure specifically may be a supine pressure, i.e. a pressure taken with the patient in a supine position as depicted in
(28) For measurement of the resting pressure p.sub.rest, the patient has to be in a relaxed position, such as in a sitting or a lying position, also referred to as a supine position, as shown in
(29) The measurement preferably may be activated by activating a pushbutton, keypad or touch screen, such as by using one or more of the user interfaces of the evaluation unit 126. In the following, pressure values are acquired by using the pressure sensor 118. The pressure values may be acquired over time intervals, such as time intervals of 1 second, with time interval, such as 10 measurements every 100 ms per time interval. The pressure values may be stored by the evaluation unit 126. As an example, averaged pressure values over the time intervals may be calculated and stored. Thus, an averaged value of the pressure values over the time interval may be calculated and stored, such as a geometric mean value, an arithmetic mean value or a median over the ten pressure values within each time interval of 1 s.
(30) Optionally, the averaged pressure value, such as the median value, may be compared from one interval to the next time interval. If a pressure variation within 5 consecutive time intervals is below a specific threshold, such as below 0.1 to 10%, preferably below 2%, the resting pressure may be stored by the evaluation unit 126.
(31) Thus, generally, in this embodiment or other embodiments of the present invention, the resting pressure p.sub.rest may be measured after a period of stabilization of a measurement curve of pressure values acquired using the pressure sensor 118, such as in case the variation of pressure values is below a predetermined threshold, such as a threshold of 0.1 to 10%, preferably below 2%. Therein, in this embodiment or other embodiments, the full measurement curve may be evaluated or an averaged measurement curve, such as a measurement curve containing pressure values averaged over a time interval and/or averaged over a number of measurement points.
(32) To shorten the time required for the measurement and/or to avoid having to wait until a threshold value is reached, the median of the previous 5 time intervals can be calculated for example upon command (for example via push button) or automatically (for example if a certain, select measurement time (e.g. 2 minutes) has elapsed). The median is then stored as the sub-bandage resting pressure.
(33) Generally, as outlined above, other time intervals may be used. Thus, in this embodiment or in other embodiments, instead of a time interval of 1 second, a shorter time interval, such as a time interval of 0.1 s, or a longer time interval, such as a time interval up to 60 s, may be defined.
(34) Instead of 10 measurements within each time interval, also a different number of measurements within each time interval may be taken. Thus, a number of less than 10 measurements, such as 3 measurements, or a number of more than 10 measurements, such as up to 1000 single measurements, may be taken.
(35) In
(36) As can be seen, the measurement curve of pressure values typically shows physiological periodic alterations due to the arterial pulsation (reference number 136) and due to the respiratory activity (reference number 138). As outlined above, it is possible to detect these arterial pulsations and to detect the amplitude of these pulsations. It is even possible to evaluate the amplitude of these pulsations and to compare this amplitude to a threshold, in order to be able to generate a warning in case the amplitude of the arterial pulsations is too low. Further, in view of the above-mentioned averaging over a plurality of pressure values, the arterial pulsations generally show that for analysis of arterial pulsation a minimum number of single measurements for averaging is desirable at least six per second. It will be appreciated that the higher the number, the more accurate the arterial pulsation analysis.
(37) The above-mentioned measurements mainly refer to a measurement of the resting pressure p.sub.rest, specifically an initial measurement of the resting pressure as a baseline measurement. Further, as outlined above, at least one standing pressure p.sub.standing is measured, specifically at least one so-called extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended.
(38) For measuring the standing pressure, after the measurement in the supine position, the system generally may invite the user to perform the measurement of the standing pressure, such as by inviting the user to change position into the standing position. For this purpose, the evaluation unit 126 may give an acoustical or numerical signal. This signal may be also used to remind changing the position to standing.
(39) Directly after application of the compression device 112, the resting pressure p.sub.rest1 may be too low or too high because of a false application technique. In order to detect this false application technique, the resting pressure p.sub.rest1 may be compared to one or more threshold values. As an example, if the resting pressure p.sub.rest1, preferably the supine resting pressure, is below 50 mmHg, the monitoring system 116, specifically the evaluation unit 126, may indicate that the compression is ineffective and has to be changed. This threshold can also be lower as detailed below:
P.sub.rest1<50 mmHg (preferably <20 mmHg, more preferably <15 mmHg, most preferably <10 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression, pressure too low
(40) Also, as indicated above, p.sub.rest1 may be too high. Typically, values higher than 60 mmHg are considered to be intolerable or may cause circulatory disorder:
P.sub.rest1>60 mmHg (more preferably >80 mm Hg, most preferably >100 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression, pressure too high
(41) Generally, the resting pressure, such as the resting pressure measured in a supine position, decreases over time due to material fatigue, slippage of bandage or limb volume reduction. This process may also be monitored by comparing one or more key figures to one or more threshold values. Thus, in case some time after application of the compression device 112 the resting pressure p.sub.rest2 drops below a threshold such as below 40 mmHg, the evaluation unit 126 may indicate that the compression device 112, such as the compression bandage, is not effective any longer. This threshold can also be lower as indicated below:
p.sub.rest2<40 mmHg (preferably <15 mmHg, more preferably <25 mmHg, most preferably <5 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
(42) The resting pressure could also increase over time e.g. due to changes (e.g. slippage) in the compression system such that p.sub.rest2 could be too high (e.g. values higher than 60 mmHg):
P.sub.rest2>60 mmHg (preferably 22 80 mmHg, most preferably >100 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression, pressure too high
(43) As the resting pressure such as the supine pressure may show relevant inter-individual variations, a further option may be to calculate the absolute change or the relative change of the actual p.sub.rest2 in comparison to the initial p.sub.rest1. Thus, again, the absolute change of the relative change may be compared to one or more threshold values.
(44) As an example, if p.sub.rest2, in comparison with p.sub.rest1, is reduced by more than 20% (more particularly more than 40%), such that the remaining resting pressure p.sub.rest2 is lower than 80% (more particularly lower than 60%) as compared to the baseline resting pressure p.sub.rest1, the evaluation unit 126 may indicate that compression is not effective any longer:
(P.sub.rest2/p.sub.rest1)100%<80%, preferably <60%.fwdarw.change compression
(45) As further indicated above, in this or other embodiments of the present invention, two or more key figures may be combined. As an example, absolute values of the resting pressure may be compared to one or more thresholds and, at the same time, a combination of two key figures may be compared to one or more thresholds. As an example, the evaluation unit 126 may be adapted to monitor that the actual resting pressure p.sub.rest2 does not fall below 60% compared to initial p.sub.rest1 and, further, does not fall below an absolute pressure threshold of 15 mmHg. All threshold values described above may be combined this way.
(46) B.) Measurement of the Extended Standing Pressure p.sub.standing, extended
(47) As outlined above, the monitoring system 116 and the method according to the present invention use the so-called extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended as a key figure for assessment of efficacy of the compression device 112. The extended standing pressure is measured by using a modified process of measuring the pressure in the upright standing position. Standing position can mean that the patient is standing on both feet without any movements. In the best case, the patient would have both hands holding on something to avoid muscle contractions for balancing. A more realistic, alternative approach would be that the patient is standing in elevated position (e.g. a step) on the non-investigational leg. The leg with the pressure sensor should not be moved and should hang without contact to the floor.
(48) In
(49) As outlined above, if a compression device 112 becomes too loose because of material fatigue, volume reduction of the included leg, slippage of the system, or a combination, the system loses some of its capacity to keep the venous filling forces inside the compressed area. In other words, the system is less effective.
(50) As can be seen in
(51) The evaluation unit 126 automatically evaluates the slope of the measurement curve and compares the slope to a predetermined threshold. In
(52) As an example, in this embodiment or other embodiments, the endpoint threshold value T may be equal to or less than 0.5 mmHg per second, preferably equal or less than 0.05 mmHg per second, most preferably equal or less than 0.01 mmHg per second.
(53) In the exemplary embodiment depicted in
(54) Also, the user could manually activate the monitoring system 116 by e.g. pushbutton to directly start measurement and documentation of the standing pressure. After completing measurement in the standing position, the system may provide an acoustical or optical signal. This signal may be also used to remind changing the position to walking as outlined later.
(55) In this embodiment or any other embodiments, the extended standing pressure may be used instead of the standing pressure as determined in a conventional way, such as for any subsequent evaluation of the efficacy of the compression system 110 of the compression device 112. The standing pressure as determined in a conventional way may, however, be used in addition, such as as an additional key figure.
(56) Directly after application of the compression system 110, the standing pressure p.sub.standing1 or the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended1 are usually higher than in every subsequent measurement (p.sub.standing2, p.sub.standing, extended2) performed at a later point in time. Initially p.sub.standing1 and/or p.sub.standing, extended1 should be higher than a predetermined threshold, such as 40 mmHg. Generally when using p.sub.standing1 and/or p.sub.standing, extended1 as a key figure, a threshold of 40 mmHg or lower may be used:
p.sub.standing1 and/or p.sub.standing, extended1<40 mmHg (preferably <30 mmHg, most preferably <20 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression.
(57) The measurement of the extended standing pressure and, optionally and additionally, the conventional standing pressure, may be repeated at a later point in time, such as after several minutes, several hours or even several days. As indicated above, the values derived thereby may be used as additional key figures and will be denoted as p.sub.standing2 and p.sub.standing, extended2 in the following. Again, these key figures may be compared to one or more threshold values.
(58) Thus, as an example, the standing pressure p.sub.standing2 and/or the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended2 should not fall below a threshold of 35 mmHg or lower:
p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.standing, extended2<35 mmHg (preferably <25 mmHg, most preferably <15 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
(59) Both the extended standing pressure and the conventional standing pressure may be used for deriving further key figures for evaluating the efficacy of the compression device 112. Thus, as both the standing pressure and the extended standing pressure typically show inter-individual differences, a further option is to document the relative change of the actual p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.standing, extended2 in comparison to the initial (extended) standing pressure p.sub.standing1 or p.sub.standing, extended1, respectively, performed directly after application of the compression device 112. If p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.standing, extended2, respectively, is reduced by more than 20% (in particular more than 40%), so that it is lower than 80% (in particular lower than 60%) compared to baseline p.sub.standing1 or p.sub.standing, extended1, respectively, the evaluation unit 126 may indicate that the compression is not effective any longer.
(60) Generally, in the present example or in other embodiments of the present invention, the threshold value for p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.standing, extended2 indicating inefficacy can be 80% or preferably 60%:
(p.sub.standing2/p.sub.standing1)100% and/or (p.sub.standing, extended2/p.sub.standing, extended1)100%<80%, preferably <60%.fwdarw.change compression device
(61) Also both, absolute and relative thresholds can be combined, e.g. the actual p.sub.standing(, extended)2 must not fall below 35 mmHg and the percent ratio of actual p.sub.standing(, extended)2 to the previous p.sub.standing(,extended)1 must not fall below 60%.
(62) All threshold values described above can be combined this way.
(63) The time period needed between changing from the resting position, such as the supine position, to the standing position of the patient until the time when the pressure does not further increase may also be used as a diagnostic criterion of chronic venous disease. Thus, in the example depicted in
(64) The more compression a system delivers to the extremity, the more these forces counteract venous dilatation and consecutively valve insufficiency. This positive effect to the venous system can lead to longer refilling time. The refilling time could hence also be used to assess how effective the compression system influences venous reflux.
(65) In this example or in other examples of the present invention, when using the refilling time as a key figure, the refilling time (t.sub.refill) may be measured more than once, at different points in time. Thus, as an example, the refilling time may be measured at baseline and at follow-up. Differences between baseline and follow-up, again, may be compared to one or more threshold values. Thus, as an example, the difference of less than 5 seconds between refilling times measured at different points in time may be considered optimal, while differences in refilling times of greater than five seconds, more particularly greater than 10 seconds may be considered as an indication to change the compression system.
t.sub.refill1t.sub.refill2>5 s (preferably >10 s).fwdarw.change compression
(66) Furthermore, a refilling time which may be overall too short may indicate a venous valve insufficiency and could be an indication for a warning for the user to consult with the medical practitioner. Thus, as an example, as an upper threshold value for the absolute refilling time may be 30 seconds:
t.sub.refill<30 s.fwdarw.warning signal (short refilling time/consult medical practitioner)
(67) In
(68) Beside the venous refilling time, also the shape of the measurement curves, such as the measurement curves 140 and 142 in
(69) C.) Measurement of Static Stiffness
(70) Further, a significant key figure for evaluating the efficacy of the compression device 112 may be the so-called static stiffness index SSI. Again, the static stiffness index, which is generally known in the art, may be calculated by using the conventional standing pressure and/or by using the extended standing pressure, as discussed above. In case the conventional standing pressure is used, the expression SSI will be used in the following, whereas, in case the extended standing pressure is used, the expression ESSI (extended static stiffness index) will be used in the following.
(71) The static stiffness index generally denotes the difference between the pressure in the resting position, such as in the supine position, and the pressure in the upright position. For effective compression of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcer, high stiffness is considered to be most effective. After some days of application of the compression device 112, such as after some days after application of a compression bandage, the SSI (or ESSI, respectively) may have changed in comparison to the baseline status directly after application of the compression device 112. This effect may be caused by material fatigue, slippage of the bandage or the therapeutic effect of limb volume reduction.
(72) For assessing the SSI or ESSI, respectively, the sub-bandage pressure may be measured in the resting position first, by measuring as explained above in section A. For assessing the standing pressure p.sub.standing or the extended standing pressure p.sub.standing, extended, reference may be made to section B above.
(73) After the monitoring system 116 has finished measuring the resting pressure, an acoustical signal may be given. Additionally or alternatively, other invitations for changing position may be provided to the user. After this signal, the patient should change to the standing position. As indicated above, after some time, the pressure signal becomes stable and the evaluation unit 126 may automatically detect the extended standing pressure as described in section B above. Additionally or alternatively, as explained above, a conventional method may be used for measuring the standing pressure.
(74) Instead of using actual measurements for determining the static stiffness index and/or the extended static stiffness index, additionally or alternatively, values provided by data input may be used. Thus, another procedure may be to enter the information of the patient's position via a pushbutton, keypad or touch screen. After the system gets this information of position change, the system continues to measure pressure in time intervals for evaluation of the standing pressure as described in section B above.
(75) Generally, the evaluation unit 126 may document two pressures, one in resting position, one in standing position.
(76) The static stiffness index (SSI) may be defined by the following formula:
SSI=p.sub.standing [mmHg]p.sub.rest [mmHg]
(77) Similarly, the extended static stiffness index (ESSI) may be defined by:
ESSI=p.sub.standing, extended [mmHg]p.sub.rest [mmHg]
(78) Several parameters may have an influence on the SSI or ESSI, respectively. Thus, SSI and/or ESSI may be related to a bandage material, the degree of bandage stretch when applied by the therapist, a size and an activity of the muscles such as the calf musculature or the mobility of certain joints, such as the mobility in ankle joints, especially in elderly patients and it may be related to the location on the limb, where the pressure is measured. (see
(79) In the above-mentioned publication by Mosti et al., some experimental results are disclosed, which compare measurements taken immediately after the application of the compression device 112 and measurements taken one week after application, for a plurality of 100 patients. The data reveal that effective ulcer healing correlates with a SSI that does not drop significantly over time. By using the extended static stiffness index ESSI instead of the conventional SSI, as proposed herein, the reproducibility and precision of the key figure SSI/ESSI may further be increased.
(80) Again, in this example or in other exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the key figure of the static stiffness index and/or the key figure of the extended static stiffness index again may be compared to one or more threshold values. Thus, generally, as for all other key figures, the evaluation unit 126 may be adapted to perform this comparison automatically. Again, the key figures may be determined repeatedly at different points in time, such as immediately after application of the compression device 112 as well as after a certain time span after application of the compression device 112, such as after several minutes, several hours or even several days. As an example, a lower threshold for the initial static stiffness index and/or for the initial extended static stiffness index may be selected. Thus, as an example, directly after application of the compression device 112 such as the compression bandage, the initial SSI (SSI.sub.1) and/or the initial ESSI (ESSI.sub.1) may be assessed by the monitoring system 116, such as by the evaluation unit 126. The evaluation unit 126 may be programmed to indicate inefficacy of the compression device 112, if the SSI.sub.1 and/or the ESSI.sub.1 is lower than a select threshold of e.g. 10 mmHg or 15 mmHg, respectively (or preferably an even lower threshold of 5 mmHg or 10 mmHg, respectively):
SSI.sub.1=p.sub.standing1 [mmHg]p.sub.rest1 [mmHg]
SSI.sub.1<10 mmHg (preferably <5 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
And/or:
ESSI.sub.1=p.sub.standing, extended1 [mmHg]p.sub.rest1 [mmHg]
ESSI.sub.1<15 mmHg (preferably <10 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
As indicated above and as valid for any key figure K used for assessment of the efficacy of the compression device 112, the key figure of the static stiffness index and/or the key figure of the extended static stiffness index may be determined repeatedly, such as by determining this key figure at a later point in time. Thus, for control of effective compression, a subsequent measurement of the SSI and/or ESSI may be performed at a later in time point.
(81) Again, as valid for any type of key figure, the key figure determined at a later point in time again may be compared to one or more threshold values which may be different from the threshold values applied to the previously determined key figures. Additionally or alternatively, the key figure determined at a later point in time may be compared to the respective key figure previously determined.
(82) Thus, as an example, the monitoring system 116 and, specifically, the evaluation unit 126, may indicate in efficacy in case the SSI.sub.2 and/or the ESSI.sub.2 are below a predetermined threshold value. Generally, in this embodiment or other embodiments, this threshold value may be lower than those described for SSI.sub.1 and ESSI.sub.1. As an example, the following comparisons may be performed by the evaluation unit 126:
SSI.sub.2=p.sub.standing2 [mmHg]p.sub.rest2 [mmHg]
SSI.sub.2<5 mmHg (preferably <3 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
And/or:
ESSI.sub.2=p.sub.standing, extended2 [mmHg]p.sub.rest2 [mmHg]
ESSI.sub.2<10 mmHg (preferably <4 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
(83) Again, as the SSI and/or EESI typically show inter-individual variations, a further option may be to add the relative change of the actual SSI.sub.2 and/or ESSI.sub.2 in comparison to the initial SSI.sub.1 or ESSI.sub.1, respectively, the latter acquired directly after application of the compression device 112, such as directly after bandage application. If the actual SSI.sub.2 and/or ESSI.sub.2 is reduced by more than a predetermined threshold, such as 20%, preferably 40%, as compared to the initial value SSI.sub.1 or ESSI.sub.1, respectively, the monitoring system 116 and, specifically, the evaluation unit 126 may indicate that the compression device 112 is not effective any longer.
(84) As an example:
SSI.sub.2=p.sub.standing2 [mmHg]p.sub.rest2 [mmHg]
SSI.sub.1=p.sub.standing1 [mmHg]p.sub.rest1 [mmHg]
(SSI.sub.2/SSI.sub.1)100%<80%, preferably <60%.fwdarw.change compression
And/or:
ESSI.sub.2=p.sub.standing, extended2 [mmHg]p.sub.rest2 [mmHg]
ESSI.sub.1=p.sub.standing, extended1 [mmHg]p.sub.rest1 [mmHg]
(ESSI.sub.2:ESSI.sub.1)100%<80%, preferably <60%.fwdarw.change compression
(85) Again, as for all the key figures, absolute and relative thresholds may be used and/or may be combined. Thus, as an example, the actual SSI.sub.2 and/or ESSI.sub.2 may be monitored in order not to fall below 60% compared to initial SSI.sub.1 or ESSI.sub.1, respectively, and also may be monitored in order not to fall below an absolute value of 5 mmHg or 10 mmHg, respectively. All threshold values described above may be combined this way.
(86) D.) Measurement of Amplitudes
(87) As outlined above, one or more amplitudes of measurement curves during a defined activity or movement of the user may be used as one or more additional key figures for determining the efficacy of the compression device 112.
(88) Thus, as an example, due to calf muscle contraction within a rigid sleeve, mainly by the musculus gastrocnemius and soleus, the sub-bandage pressure typically shows short termed pressure peaks. These amplitudes, generally defined by the differences between the pressure values in the upper and lower pressure peaks in the measurement curve, may be used as another key figure and, thus, as another option for evaluating the efficacy of a compression device 112. Again, this key figure may provide an indication of how well an applied compression system 110 manages to keep forces produced by the muscle activity inside the compressed area.
(89) In
(90) As an example, for performing the measurement, the patient has to be in the upright position and has to walk on a belt or has to do other defined physical activities. Due to calf muscle contraction, the sub-bandage pressure shortly increases and immediately decreases again within the diastolic phase of muscle relaxation.
(91) The monitoring system 116, specifically the evaluation unit 126, may automatically detect specific activities. Thus, the evaluation unit 106 may automatically detect that the patient is walking on a belt or stepper. See portion of the curve with its alternating pressure curve marked with the reference number 146 in
(92) When monitoring amplitudes, the amplitudes may be evaluated statistically. A median or mean value may be formed and compared to one or more threshold values. Thus, as an example, if a median or mean amplitude is below a predetermined threshold of e.g. 40 mmHg, more particularly of 15 mmHg, the system may indicate that compression is not effective any more:
Amplitude.sub.median or Amplitude.sub.mean<40 mmHg, preferably <15 mmHg.fwdarw.change compression
(93) Median or mean amplitudes measured at different points in time may be compared. Thus, again, a ratio of these amplitudes may be formed and may be compared to one or more threshold values. As an example, the monitoring system 116 may indicate an efficacy of the compression device 112 in case Amplitude.sub.median2 or mean2 is less than 80% (preferably less than 60%), as compared to Amplitude.sub.median1 or mean1:
(Amplitude.sub.median2/Amplitude.sub.median1)100% or (Amplitude.sub.mean2/Amplitude.sub.mean1)100%<80%, preferably 60%:.fwdarw.change compression
(94) Also both, absolute and relative thresholds may be combined, e.g. the actual median amplitude must not fall below 60% compared to the initial amplitude and also must not fall below 15 mmHg. All threshold values described above may be combined this way.
(95) E.) Multiparameter Measurement of Pressure Values
(96) A further method to assess efficacy of a compression system is to combine two or more key figures, such as two or more of the key figures listed above in sections A-D. Thus, the determination of each key figure, such as the key figures of sections A-D above, may be used as a single module for measurement. Additionally or alternatively, an arbitrary combination of key figures may be possible, which may lead to a multi-parameter assessment. A multi-parameter assessment may allow for a more precise and more reproducible assessment of a sub-bandage pressure profile.
(97) An example of a method using a multi-parameter assessment is depicted in
(98) It shall be noted that any other combination of key figures is possible. Thus, an arbitrary combination of the modules I to IV above may be used.
(99) In
(100) For details of these steps, reference may be made to the disclosure of the single modules above. Although not specifically depicted in
(101) Interface Between Algorithm and the Evaluation Unit 126 and/or Pressure Sensor 118
(102) In this embodiment or in other embodiments of the present invention, the pressure sensor 118 or, in case a plurality of pressure sensors 118 is used, each of the pressure sensors 118 may comprise an electronic identifier, such as a contactless electronic identifier, which allows for a unique identification of the pressure values provided by the respective pressure sensor 118. As an example, a RFID may be used as an electronic identifier.
(103) The electronic identifier, such as the RFID, within the pressure 118 sensor may be activated by first readout of the reader. Thus, the evaluation unit 126 may comprise a reader for reading out the electronic identifier.
(104) The monitoring system 116 may further be adapted to automatically detect new components, such as newly implemented pressure sensors 118. If the monitoring system 116 detects a new electronic identifier, such as a new RFID, the monitoring system 116 may save all measured values as the baseline status. Subsequent measurements which may be repeated within a predetermined time span, such as within 3 hours after first activation, may overwrite the first baseline values. This procedure may allow for repeating false baseline measurements. The predetermined time span, such as the period of 3 h, may as well be chosen shorter or longer than 3 h, such as 10 minutes or up to 24 h.
(105) After a waiting time according to the predetermined time span, such as after a period of 3 h, any following measurements may be stored as follow-up assessments for the compression system 110. By using the electronic identifier, such as by using the RFID, the monitoring system 116, specifically the reader, may automatically assign the follow-up values to the right patient and all subsequent values will be compared to the appropriate baseline values. Due to this procedure, deletion of data by mistake may be excluded.
(106) Further, a mixing up of patient data may be avoided by using electronic identifiers. Thus, a re-use of the sensor electronics may be avoided in order to avoid false RFID assignment to another patient, which may lead to incorrect calculation of baseline versus follow-up data.
(107) In the method depicted in
(108) Option 1:
(109) Each phase can be assessed separately. So, the resting pressure, standing pressure, extended standing pressure, the SSI, the ESSI and the amplitude may each be used as a single measurement. A button may be used to get into the right mode of compression measurement (e.g. resting pressure).
(110) Option 2:
(111) Combinations including a fixed sequence of measurements as shown in the flow-chart may be used to receive a more comprehensive picture of the actual properties of the compression device 112.
(112) For this purpose, a start button may be activated to start the measurement. The resting pressure may be assessed and documented automatically as described in section A above. An acoustical and/or numerical signal may provide information that the monitoring system 116 has completed the first measurement in resting position. If the measurement should be repeated immediately (e.g. due to false position of the patient), a (start) button may be pushed again.
(113) An acoustic signal may invite the user or patient to change into the standing position. As described in section B above, the device may automatically detect the accurate standing pressure. An acoustical and/or numerical signal may provide information that the monitoring system 116 has completed the second measurement in the standing position. If the measurement should be repeated immediately (e.g. because the patient has been moving excessively), a start button may be pushed again.
(114) On the basis of the resting pressure and the standing pressure or the resting pressure and the extended standing pressure, the monitoring system 116 may automatically calculate the third parameter SSI and/or ESSI, respectively, as disclosed above in section C.
(115) After an appropriate invitation by the monitoring system 116, such as after an acoustic signal, the patient may start to walk on a treadmill, stepper or another device that allows continuous and periodic exercise, preferably in a controlled and reproducible way. As described in section D above, the monitoring system 116 may automatically measure the working pressure amplitude. An acoustical and/or numerical signal may provide information that the monitoring system 116 has completed the measurement in the walking position. If the measurement should be repeated immediately (e.g. because the patient did not walk regularly), a start button may be pushed.
(116) Finally, the monitoring system 116 may either display all values numerically, including the resting pressure, the standing pressure, the extended standing pressure, the SSI, the ESSI, the amplitude, or any arbitrary combination thereof, as well as, optionally, appropriate changes with reference to the respective baselines, such as the percentage changes compared to baseline. Additionally or alternatively, the monitoring system 116 may automatically calculate if the compression device 112 is still effective, such as by evaluating one or more key figures, e.g. according to one or more of the algorithms and/or threshold values disclosed in sections A-D above. If these calculations are based on more than one value, the thresholds given under A-D might change within the given ranges.
(117) Generally, in this embodiment or other embodiments, an information regarding the efficacy of the compression device 112 (such as whether the compression device 112 is still effective or not) may be provided to the user in an arbitrary way, such as by visual display. As an example, a traffic light type display may be used, indicating an efficacy by a green light, an intermediate or reduced efficacy by a yellow light, and an inefficacy by a red light.
(118) F.) Measurement of Arterial Pulsations
(119) As outlined above, specifically with respect to
(120) Thus, in addition or alternatively to some of the key figures disclosed in sections A-E above, one or more key figures derived from arterial pulsations may be used. Thus, periodic oscillations in one or more of the measurement curves may be detected, preferably over the whole period of measurement time. Periodic oscillations due to arterial pulsations (denoted by reference number 136 in
(121) G.) Assessment of Patient Activity Profile
(122) During position changes of the leg, walking or training exercise, sub-bandage pressure typically changes and venous blood is consecutively shifted in proximal direction back to the central circulation. Typically, one important aspect of sufficient and appropriate compression therapy is the cooperation of the patient. Physical exercise, walking, biking or in minimum some movement, increases the venous flow under compression therapy.
(123) Generally, by using the monitoring system 116 having the at least one pressure sensor 118, an activity profile of the patient may be recorded and may be evaluated. Thus, two or more intensity levels may be identified in one or more continuous measurement curves of pressure values provided by the pressure sensor 118, wherein, for example, for each intensity level of the activity profile, the monitoring system 116 may evaluate how much time the patient has spanned within the respective intensity level.
(124) Generally, an algorithm may be used which is capable of finding predefined pressure alterations which are typically observed under movement. The algorithm may be capable of detecting pressure alterations, here defined as Exercise Events (EE). An EE is defined as an absolute (positive or negative) change of pressure larger than 1-30 mmHg, preferably 5 mmHg. This pressure alteration should occur within a time period of 0.1-10 s, preferably 1 s. EEs may be recorded over the whole time of application of the compression device.
(125) Over one hour or up to one or more days, the amount of EEs per time period (e.g. 1 hour) may be calculated and rated on an activity index, such as on a 1-10 Activity Index (AI) scale. A low AI means no or low activity, a higher Index means that the patient sufficiently moved and consecutively supported the clinical benefit of the compression system. The scale for AIs can be larger with up to 1-100 for more precise differentiation of activity intensities.
(126) Further, EEs with varying intensities may be distinguished, e.g. EE.sub.1 with 3-6 mmHg, EE.sub.2>6-10, EE.sub.3 with >10 mmHg absolute pressure difference:
EE.sub.1|3-6 mmHg|
EE.sub.2>|6-10 mmHg|
EE.sub.3>|10 mmHg|
(127) EEs with different intensities may also be weighted, so that one EE.sub.3 has more impact than one EE.sub.1 for example:
Impact EE1<Impact EE2<Impact EE3
(128) Instead of 3 intensity levels, a different number of intensity levels may be used. Thus, also 2-100 EEs can be defined for more precise activity evaluation.
(129) Further, other key figures may be used in addition. Thus, one or more of the key figures SSI.sub.1, SSI.sub.2, ESSI.sub.1, ESSI.sub.2 and amplitudes, measured according to sections C and D above, may be used to adjust the varying intensities of the EEs. This procedure can be helpful as the working amplitudes may decrease due to material fatigue over time of wearing albeit the patient exercised with equal intensity.
(130) The allocation of the patient activity to a value of the AI scale (e.g. 4 on a 1-10 scale) can be predefined by the monitoring system 116. Further, the therapist may adjust this AI allocation according to the physical condition of the patient. For example, a patient with a significant walking disability may have the same definition for EEs to maintain comparability. However, the AI scale can be less stringent to maintain enough resolution even for low activity profiles.
(131) In parallel to the Activity Index generated by pressure gradients, also a motion sensor placed on the leg, foot or other parts of the body may be added to the monitoring system 116. This motion sensor may be capable of tracking continuous information about movements. This information can be used to complete the AI profile. Also, the motion sensor can be used to activate the sleep modus in case no activity is detected. In this case, the interval from one single measurement to the next measurement will be increased to prolong the life of a battery.
(132) Patient Coaching
(133) The description above summarizes how the activity profile may be recorded to allow the therapist appropriate medical judgement and consecutive instructions for the patient. In a further step, the monitoring system 116 could also coach the patient to achieve good physical activity for optimal compression effects.
(134) For this purpose, the therapist might feed the system with a minimum required AI rate for a predefined time interval. With e.g. an acoustical signal, the monitoring system 116 may confirm acceptable activity, or in opposite demand further movement to optimize the action of the compression system. With a green, yellow, or red light or a smiley, the patient may be informed about the current activity achievement.
(135) Further, as outlined above, a motion sensor could add information about the activity profile of the patient.
(136) H.) Continuous Safety Surveillance System of Critical Overpressure
(137) Typically, a high pressure exerted by the compression device 112 is rather uncritical, as long as the overpressure lasts for a short period only. This is typically observed if patients walk or do other physical activity. However, if the pressure is continuously high, e.g. in the supine position at night, there is a risk for pressure related skin damage. For safety reasons it is therefore useful to optionally provide a warning in case the pressure exceeds a defined threshold value, such as for a longer time period.
(138) As an example of a safety surveillance system which may be implemented into the monitoring system 116, the pressure may be recorded automatically. High pressure may be defined as a pressure exceeding a predetermined threshold, such as a pressure exceeding a threshold of 60 mmHg, preferably 80 mmHg, most preferably 100 mmHg. A warning may be created by the monitoring system 116 in case the pressure exceeds the predetermined threshold, such as for at least a predetermined time period. Thus, as an example, in case the pressure is continuously higher than e.g. 80 mmHg over a period of more than 1 s, preferably 120 s, most preferably 600 s, the monitoring system 116 may provide a warning, such as by an output of an acoustic signal and/or a visual signal. In such a case, the patient should change the position or walk, or move toes or the limb. In many cases, this can already change the applied forces exerted by the compression device 112. In a worst case, if changing the body position of movement does not help, the patient may have to remove the compression device 112, such as the compression bandage, or may have to reduce the tension in case of an adjustable compression system 110.
(139) In case of a coincident disease, e.g. peripheral arterial occlusive disease, pressure may be more critical. In this case, the therapist may adjust the threshold for pressure and the time of pressure according to the patient's needs.
(140) I.) Continuous Surveillance of Insufficient Pressure Profiles
(141) As outlined above, resting and standing pressure (including extended standing pressure) as well as pressure amplitudes may be measured, such as by a nurse, a physician, a therapist or any other medical staff. For this procedure, the patient may be instructed to change to the needed body position.
(142) In order to allow for an assessment of compression efficacy independently from any therapist or clinical visit, the monitoring system 116 may also continuously monitor the pressure profiles and, hence, the efficacy of the compression device 112. Therein, various options exist. Several potential options are described below:
(143) Option 1: Once a day (such as 1-20 times a day) the patient may initiate a measurement, such as by pressing a button on the monitoring system 116, and will assume a resting position, such as by assuming a supine position, as described in section A above. The monitoring system 116 may automatically measure the resting pressure, such as once the measurement curve has stabilized. Subsequently, the evaluation unit 126 may invite the patient to change a position. Thus, an acoustic signal may be provided to the patient. The patient may then change into the standing position, and the monitoring system 116 will again measure the pressure, preferably automatically. The results of p.sub.rest2 and p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.rest2 and p.sub.standing, extended2 may be compared to the initial data p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.standing1 and/or p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.standing, extended1, preferably automatically. A difference between the baseline (p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.standing1 and/or p.sub.rest1 and p.sub.standing, extended1) and follow-up measurements (p.sub.rest2 and p.sub.standing2 and/or p.sub.rest2 and p.sub.standing, extended2) may be processed, such as disclosed above in sections A and B.
(144) The same procedure may be performed with one or more of the SSI, the ESSI and the pressure amplitude, as disclosed in sections C above and D.
(145) As previously discussed, the monitoring system 116 may indicate if the compression device 112, such as the compression bandage, is not effective any more.
(146) Option 2: Once a day (such as 1-20 times a day) the monitoring system 116 may provide an invitation to the patient, such as by providing an acoustic signal. After that, the patient may change to a resting position, such as to the supine position, and, later on, to the standing and/or walking position as described above under 1.
(147) Option 3: For permanent assessment of the efficacy of the compression device 112, the monitoring system 116 may continuously measure the pressure. The monitoring system 116 may acquire measurement curves and may detect the standing pressure and/or the extended standing pressure, such as by evaluating the asymptotic behavior of the measurement curve, as disclosed above in sections A and B. An asymptotic function typically is only detected if the patient is at rest, e.g. in supine or sitting position, and/or if the patient is standing without significant movement. In the supine position, the lowest pressure curves are expected.
(148) By detecting the lowest pressure value in the measurement curve, and, further, by assuming that this lowest pressure value is measured in a resting position, specifically in a supine position, the lowest pressure value may be recorded. Thus, as an example, the lowest pressure value acquired within 1 h up to 1 day, preferably 12 h, may be recorded as the actual resting pressure p.sub.min. In parallel, the same procedure optionally may be performed with the maximum asymptotic pressure curve. This value may be recorded as p.sub.max. The difference of p.sub.min and p.sub.max may be defined as p:
p.sub.maxp.sub.min=p
p typically only provides a very rough approximation of the SSI or ESSI, respectively. It may be desirable to compare a p of the first day (p.sub.1) with a p of the second day (p.sub.2). The monitoring system 116 may indicate inefficacy, if the difference between p.sub.1 and p.sub.2 is greater than a predetermined threshold, such as 3 mmHg, preferably 10 mmHg:
p.sub.1p.sub.2>3 mmHg (preferably >10 mmHg).fwdarw.change compression
(149) Further, additionally or alternatively, relative changes may be used to define inefficacy. Thus, pressure changes p.sub.1 and p.sub.2 measured at different points in time may be compared. Thus, again, a ratio of these pressure changes may be formed and may be compared to one or more threshold values. As an example, the monitoring system 116 may indicate an inefficacy of the compression device 112 in case p.sub.2 is less than 80% (preferably less than 60%), as compared to p.sub.1:
(p.sub.2/p.sub.1)100%<80%, preferably <60%.fwdarw.change compression
(150) Option 4: A further optional method for assessment if the compression device 112 is still effective may be the assessment of amplitudes when the patient performs a particular activity, such as walking, as described in detail above in Section D.
(151) Position of the Pressure Sensor 118
(152) A single pressure sensor 118 may be applied at the medial aspect of the lower leg, at the transition of the gastrocnemius muscle into the Achilles tendon. This position is denoted by B1 in
(153) As this point covers only a small anatomical area, it is easy to imagine that a pressure sensor 118 may easily be misplaced.
(154) Positioning a pressure sensor 118 on the muscular part of the calf (position C in
(155) Also a plurality of pressure sensors 118 may be used in order to assess pressure at several areas. Further, one or more large area pressure sensors 118 might be used. Thus, as an example, one big wide pressure sensor 118 may be used which covers the whole leg. This pressure sensor 118 might be capable of measuring the pressure under relevant portions or even under the whole surface of the compression device 112. The at least one pressure sensor 118 and/or the pressure sensor positions defined above may be used for all described methods to measure compression efficacy.