Manufacture of a Compact Ejector System for a Boosted Internal Combustion Engine
20180036956 ยท 2018-02-08
Inventors
- David S. Moyer (Sterling Heights, MI, US)
- Shawn McGrath (Carleton, MI, US)
- Roger Joseph Khami (Troy, MI, US)
- Chris A. Myers (Holly, MI, US)
- Robert Joseph Mohan (Canton, MI, US)
- Steven James Hoffman (Ann Arbor, MI, US)
- John Emley (Canton, MI, US)
- Scott M. Rollins (Canton, MI, US)
- Eric A. Macke (Ann Arbor, MI, US)
- Matthew Werner (Marysville, MI, US)
Cpc classification
B29C66/322
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/301
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/55
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F04F5/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B29C65/72
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F04F5/46
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M25/0854
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B29C65/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/534
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/3022
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C65/48
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29L2031/748
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C65/8246
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C45/006
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/532
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C66/54
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F04F5/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F02M25/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B29C45/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C65/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Vapors in the fuel tank of a vehicle are collected in a carbon canister. An ejector or aspirator is used to purge the carbon canister in a pressure-charged engine in which a positive pressure exists in the intake. A compact ejector includes a substantially planar flange and a venturi tube coupled to the flange with a central axis of the venturi tube substantially parallel to the flange. By manufacturing the ejector in two pieces, dimensions within the ejector: throat, converging section, and diverging section, is more accurate than prior art manufacturing techniques thereby providing better flow characteristics throughout the boost range.
Claims
1. A method to fabricate an ejector, comprising: molding a first piece comprising: a first tube, a second tube, a flange and a first portion of a venturi tube; molding a second piece comprising a second portion of the venturi tube; and affixing the first piece with the second piece.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first piece is affixed to the second piece by welding.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein: the first piece is affixed to the second piece by a plurality of snap fit connectors around the periphery of the first piece; a seal between an interface surface of the first piece and an interface surface of the second piece is formed by one of: surface features of the mating first and second pieces that substantially prevent flow between the mating surfaces; a groove in the interface surface of the first piece with an 0-ring disposed therein; a groove in the interface surface of the second piece with an 0-ring disposed therein; and an adhesive applied to at least one of the interface surface of the first piece and the interface surface of the second piece.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein: an interface between the first piece and the second piece is substantially coincident with a centerline of the venturi tube.
5. The method of claim 1, comprising: testing leak rate, flow rate, and vacuum draw in the ejector wherein if any of the leak rate, the flow rate, and the vacuum draw of the ejector is out of range, the ejector is scrapped.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the venturi tube comprises: a converging section, a throat of a predetermined diameter, and a diverging section.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein: a centerline of the first tube forms an acute angle with the flange; the first tube forms a flow straightening section upstream of the venturi tube: and the venturi tube comprises: a converging section, a throat of a predetermined diameter, and a diverging section.
8. A method to fabricate an ejector on an air intake component of an internal combustion engine, comprising: placing a venturi tube of the ejector into an opening formed in an intake system component; welding the ejector to the intake air component of the engine wherein the ejector is fabricated by: molding a first ejector piece that comprises a first tube, a second tube, a flange, and a first portion of the venturi tube; molding a second ejector piece comprising a second portion of the venturi tube; and affixing the first ejector piece to the second ejector piece.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the intake air component is an air intake duct.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein the intake air component is an air filter box.
11. The method of claim 8 further comprising: attaching a first line to an inlet of the first tube; and attaching a second line to an inlet of the second tube wherein: the first tube is fluidly coupled to an engine intake; and the second tube is fluidly coupled to a carbon canister.
12. The method of claim 8 wherein the first ejector piece is affixed to the second ejector piece by welding.
13. The method of claim 8 wherein: the first ejector piece is affixed to the second ejector piece by a plurality of snap fit connectors around the periphery of an interface between the first and second ejector pieces; a seal between an interface surface of the first ejector piece and an interface surface of the second ejector piece is formed by one of: a groove in the interface surface of the first ejector piece with an O-ring disposed therein; a groove in the interface surface of the second ejector piece with an O-ring disposed therein; and an adhesive applied to at least one of the interface surface of the first ejector piece and the interface surface of the second ejector piece.
14. The method of claim 8 wherein the venturi tube comprises: a converging section, a throat, and a converging section with a portion of the converging section distal from the throat being an exit of the venturi tube, the method further comprising: tilting an exit of the venturi tube toward the opening in the intake air component before placing the ejector into the opening in the intake system component.
15. A method to install an ejector into an intake air duct of an internal combustion engine wherein: the ejector is fabricated by: molding a first ejector piece that comprises a first tube, a second tube, a flange, and a first portion of a venturi tube; molding a second ejector piece comprising a second portion of the venturi tube; and welding the first ejector piece to the second ejector piece, the method comprising: placing the venturi tube of the ejector into an opening formed in the intake air duct; and welding the ejector to the intake air duct proximate to the opening of the intake air duct.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein: a centerline of the second tube is substantially perpendicular to the flange; and a centerline of the first tube forms an acute angle with a centerline of the second tube.
17. The method of claim 15 wherein: the venturi tube comprises: a converging section, a throat, and a diverging section; and p1 the first tube serves as a flow straightener upstream of the converging section.
18. The method of claim 15 wherein the intake air duct has a flat surface proximate the opening in the air duct; and the flange is welded to the flat surface.
19. The method of claim 15 wherein the venturi tube comprises: a converging section, a throat, and a diverging section with a portion of the diverging section distal from the throat being an exit of the venturi tube, the method further comprising: tilting an exit of the venturi tube toward the opening in the intake air component before placing the ejector into the opening in the intake system component.
20. The method of claim 15 wherein: a centerline of the first tube is substantially perpendicular to the flange; a centerline of the second tube is substantially perpendicular to the flange; and the venturi tube further comprises a flow straightening section upstream of the converging section.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0069] As those of ordinary skill in the art will understand, various features of the embodiments illustrated and described with reference to any one of the Figures may be combined with features illustrated in one or more other Figures to produce alternative embodiments that are not explicitly illustrated or described. The combinations of features illustrated provide representative embodiments for typical applications. However, various combinations and modifications of the features consistent with the teachings of the present disclosure may be desired for particular applications or implementations. Those of ordinary skill in the art may recognize similar applications or implementations whether or not explicitly described or illustrated.
[0070] One embodiment of an ejector 150 according to the disclosure is shown in
[0071] Weld joint 176 is substantially parallel to flange 152 and is coincident with a diameter of an opening through venturi tube 170. Referring now to
[0072] In some embodiment, such as shown in
[0073] In some embodiments, the weld between the two pieces of ejector 150 in
[0074] Referring to
[0075] One of the advantage of ejector 200 of
[0076] As will be discussed below, ejector 200 is coupled to an air intake component. In some embodiments, a surface 240 on the underside of flange 202 interfaces or mates with a surface on the intake air component. As discussed, some of the material is displaced into a place where it is not wanted during the molding process, molding flash. When ejector 200 is welded to the air intake component, welding flash develops. To present welding flash from going into places that would interfere with the function of the ejector, flash traps 242 and 244 are provided on either side of ejector 200.
[0077] Analysis of the design has indicated that it is preferable for exit cross section of the ejector (150, 200, as examples) to be a flattened circle. An exit 190 of an ejector is shown in
[0078] Flowrate 850 of a prior art ejector and flowrate 860 of the ejector of
[0079] In an alternative embodiment in
[0080] In another embodiment in
[0081] The improved design of the ejector disclosed herein is at least partially due to a new method of manufacturing such ejectors. A prior art process is shown in
[0082] Quality assurance measures begin in block 350 in which all of leak, flow and vacuum draw are measured and it is determined whether they are in acceptable ranges. If so, the ejector is ready for assembly into an engine intake component, in block 352. If out of specification in block 350, it is determined whether the flaw was caused by the molding process or molding flash (excess material on the part) in block 360. If that is determined to be the issue, in block 362, the molding process is adjusted or machine maintenance is performed and it is verified that the correction is effective before resuming. If a negative result from block 360, in block 370, it is determined whether the flaw was caused by the welding process. If so, the weld tooling or process is adjusted in block 372. Also, in block 372, it is determined whether the correction is effective. If a negative result in block 370, in block 380, it is determined whether the flaw is caused by excess moisture and/or whether the resin material is out of specification. If the dryness is causing the flaw, the material drying process is adjusted and verified. If the material is out of specification, the proper material is obtained and loaded into the molding machine, in block 382. In any case with an out of specification part, the part is scrapped in block 392. If a negative result in block 390, additional review of the processes is continued until cause of the flaw is determined and rectified.
[0083] A flow chart showing processes undertaken to produce the disclosed ejector is shown in
[0084] In
[0085] In
[0086] The duct shown in
[0087] In
[0088] It is known to manufacture the ejectors by injection molding. In the prior art, such manufacturing technique leads to the difficulty in making diverging and converging sections in the ejector because such sections are formed by cylindrical pins. According to embodiments disclosed above, the two-piece version that is split along venturi tube allows a complicated shape can be formed with a converging section, a diverging section, and a throat, that in some embodiments, slightly diverges. In the prior art, throats are typical straight. However, in some applications, it has been found that the diverging throat yields improved flow efficiency approaching supersonic flow. In some embodiments, the diverging section has a non-uniform shape and in some embodiments, tilts downwardly; such features are easily accomplished with the two-piece ejector disclosed herein. Although it might be less expensive to injection mold the ejector out of two pieces, there are alternative manufacturing techniques that allow the desired shape in one piece. A 3-D printing process is one alternative. The resulting could be like any of
[0089] In
[0090] As described above, some embodiments show a snap fit to affix the two pieces of the ejector. In such embodiments, an O-ring, adhesive, or other sealant can be used. Alternatively, a bump near the periphery of one of the pieces causes an interference with the other piece of the ejector.
[0091] In
[0092] An isometric view of an ejector has a diverging section 1000 in which a divot 1002 is formed.
[0093] While the best mode has been described in detail with respect to particular embodiments, those familiar with the art will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments within the scope of the following claims. While various embodiments may have been described as providing advantages or being preferred over other embodiments with respect to one or more desired characteristics, as one skilled in the art is aware, one or more characteristics may be compromised to achieve desired system attributes, which depend on the specific application and implementation. These attributes include, but are not limited to: cost, efficiency, strength, durability, life cycle cost, marketability, appearance, packaging, size, serviceability, weight, manufacturability, ease of assembly, etc. The embodiments described herein that are characterized as less desirable than other embodiments or prior art implementations with respect to one or more characteristics are not outside the scope of the disclosure and may be desirable for particular applications.