POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE CONTAINING NITRATE FOR SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE SEPARATION

Abstract

Provided is a polymer electrolyte membrane for SF.sub.6 separation, using a nitrate electrolyte, where the nitrate is solvated in the membrane to thus form ionic aggregates, whereby polar SF.sub.6 has difficulty passing through the membrane due to the barrier effect of the ionic aggregates, thus enabling the separation of SF.sub.6.

Claims

1. A polymer electrolyte membrane for SF.sub.6 separation, comprising an electrolyte layer of a polymer, wherein the electrolyte layer of the polymer comprises a nitrate, wherein a molar ratio of the polymer to the nitrate ranges from 1:0.50.7.

2. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 1, further comprising a porous support, wherein the electrolyte layer of the polymer is formed on the porous support.

3. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 1, wherein the polymer electrolyte membrane is provided in a planar form or a hollow fiber form.

4. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 1, wherein the nitrate comprises any one selected from among 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate, aluminum nitrate nonahydrate, ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate, ammonium nitrate, barium nitrate, beryllium nitrate, calcium nitrate hydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, cerium(III) nitrate hexahydrate, cesium nitrate, chromium(III) nitrate nonahydrate, cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate, copper(II) nitrate hemi(pentahydrate), copper(II) nitrate hydrate, copper(II) nitrate trihydrate, iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate, lead(II) nitrate, lithium nitrate, magnesium nitrate hexahydrate, manganese(II) nitrate hydrate, nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate, palladium(II) nitrate, palladium(II) nitrate dihydrate, palladium(II) nitrate hydrate, potassium nitrate, silver nitrate, and sodium nitrate.

5. The polymer electrolyte membrane of claim 1, wherein the polymer comprises any one selected from among: poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/methacrylic acid), poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(acrylamide/acrylic acid), polymethacrylamide, polyacrylamide, poly(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl-2-methacryloxyethyldimethylammonium chloride), poly(acrylamide/2-methacryloxyethyltrimethylammonium bromide), poly(2-methacryloxyethyltrimethylammonium bromide), poly(2-vinyl-1-methylpyridinium bromide), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride, poly(l-lysine hydrobromide), poly(2-vinylpyridine), poly(2-vinylpyridine N-oxide), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone/2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), dimethyl sulfate quaternary, poly(4-vinylpyridine N-oxide), poly(4-vinylpyridine), poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), N-methyl-4(4-formylstyryl)pyridinium methosulfate acetal, poly(allyl amine), poly(styrenesulfonic acid/maleic acid), sodium salt, poly(methacrylic acid), poly(ethylene/acrylic acid), poly(ethyl acrylate/acrylic acid), poly(acrylic acid), polypropylene, isotactic, poly(vinyl phosphoric acid), sodium salt, poly(styrenesulfonic acid), poly(N-vinyl acetamide), poly(N-vinyl acetamide-co-sodium acrylate), poly(N-methyl-N-vinyl acetamide) homopolymer, poly(n-butyl acrylate/2-methacryloxyethyltrimethylammonium bromide), cellulose, ethyl hydroxyethyl ether, poly(vinylsulfonic acid), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate), poly(styrenesulfonic acid/maleic acid), cellulose, hydroxyethyl ether, cellulose, methyl hydroxyethyl ether, poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(vinyl methyl ether), poly(oxyethylene), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), poly(maleic acid), poly(1-glycerol methacrylate), poly(butadiene/maleic acid), and poly(vinylphosphonic acid).

6. (canceled) Clients/2080-61/0A response

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0070] The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0071] FIG. 1 illustrates the separation of SF.sub.6 in a polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention;

[0072] FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the results of measurement of FT-IR in the polymer electrolyte membrane made of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (POZ) and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, manufactured by the process according to the present invention;

[0073] FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the results of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the POZ membrane and the polymer electrolyte membrane made of POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (1:0.7 molar ratio) manufactured by the process according to the present invention;

[0074] FIGS. 4 and 5 are graphs illustrating the results of measurement of FT-Raman in the polymer electrolyte membrane made of POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (1:0.7 molar ratio) manufactured by the process according to the present invention; and

[0075] FIG. 6 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image illustrating the polymer electrolyte membrane made of POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (1:0.7 molar ratio) manufactured by the process according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0076] The present invention pertains to a technique for separating SF.sub.6 using a polymer electrolyte membrane. The polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention includes a polymer and an electrolyte, the electrolyte being a nitrate containing NO.sub.3.sup. ions as anions. In the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, the nitrate is solvated by a solvent component that is left behind in a small amount in a polymer electrolyte membrane to thus form an ionic aggregate. When Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is used as the nitrate, the transport of SF.sub.6, which is negatively charged, is blocked due to the cation component in the ionic aggregate, for example, Cu.sup.2+, whereby SF.sub.6 does not pass through the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, whereas non-reactive nitrogen passes through the membrane of the invention, thus enabling the separation of SF.sub.6 due to this difference in permeance.

[0077] In the present invention, NO.sub.3.sup. efficiently undergoes solvation compared to the other anions, and thus facilitates the formation of an ionic aggregate in the polymer electrolyte membrane. The ionic aggregate enables the collection of ions on a large scale, compared to ion pairs or free ions. The ionic aggregate having a relatively large size is effective at blocking the transport of SF.sub.6 through the polymer electrolyte membrane.

[0078] The polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention may be manufactured in any form, such as a hollow fiber type, a planar type, etc., and may be formed on a micropore-sized porous support, or may be provided in the form of a freestanding film without any porous support.

[0079] FIG. 1 illustrates the SF.sub.6 separation mechanism in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention when using Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 as the electrolyte containing NO.sub.3.sup. ions. The SF.sub.6 separation mechanism, which blocks the transport of SF.sub.6 in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, devised by the present inventors, is illustrated in FIG. 1.

[0080] The solvation of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 in the membrane is carried out by the solvent remaining in the membrane. The solvent component for dissolving a polymer and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, for example, water, may be left behind in a small amount in the membrane even after casting and drying of the mixed solution comprising a polymer and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, whereby Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is solvated by the solvent component remaining in the solid-phase membrane after the formation of such a film. Also, even when the solvent is supplied to the membrane (e.g. humidifying conditions) from outside upon the separation of SF.sub.6, solvation of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 in the polymer electrolyte membrane is possible.

[0081] Below is a description of the SF.sub.6 separation mechanism in the membrane according to the present invention. The polymer electrolyte membrane comprising POZ (poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)) as a polymer and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 as an electrolyte is described below. Based on the following test results, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is solvated by water and is thus provided in the form of an aggregate in a polymer matrix, in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention. Here, Cu.sup.2+ is positioned at the inner core of the aggregate, NO.sub.3.sup. is positioned around the core, and the water solvent is positioned near NO.sub.3.sup., thereby forming a single ionic aggregate.

[0082] By virtue of the size of the ionic aggregate, which is relatively large compared to the ion pairs or free ions, SF.sub.6 does not pass through the membrane. Hence, another gas, for example, nitrogen, has relatively high permeance, and SF.sub.6 has relatively low permeance, consequently separating SF.sub.6. This mechanism is described through the following test examples.

TEST EXAMPLE 1

Analysis of FT-IR

[0083] The polymer electrolyte membrane comprising POZ and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was subjected to FT-IR analysis. In the following test, the solvent for POZ was water, and the solution of POZ and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 at a molar ratio of 1:0.5 was prepared in a manner in which 2.5 g of a 20% POZ solution in water was added with 0.473 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2. The solution at a molar ratio of 1:0.7 was prepared by adding 2.5 g of a 20% POZ solution with 0.662 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.

[0084] As illustrated in FIG. 1, the aggregates of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention are uniformly dispersed in the polymer chain. The ionic aggregates are solvated by some cations of water. The partially negatively charged water is assumed to be localized around the ionic aggregates. The non-polar N.sub.2 gas is transferred through the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention by means of Fickian transport, but SF.sub.6 gas, having a high quadruple moment, may be subjected to high repulsive force with partial negative charges of water, and in particular, the transport of SF.sub.6 molecules is regarded as being blocked by Cu.sup.2l + cations.

[0085] In order to confirm the formation of the polymer electrolyte membrane comprising POZ and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, the interaction between the copper ions and the carbonyl group of the amide group of the polymer was measured through FT-IR spectroscopy. The results are shown in FIG. 2.

[0086] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the spectrum of the membrane composed exclusively of POZ (hereinafter referred to as neat POZ) showed an intense free CO peak at 1607 cm.sup.1. In the membrane comprising POZ and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (the molar ratio of POZ to Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is 1:0.7), it appeared that the shift of the free CO peak at 1607 cm.sup.1 was negligible. Thus, the copper ions are considered to have no interaction with the carbonyl group in POZ.

[0087] Also, the stretching frequency of NO.sub.3.sup. is known to occur at 1336 cm.sup.1. When Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was incorporated into POZ, the peak intensity at 1392 cm.sup.1 was decreased and the peak of free NO.sub.3.sup. at 1336 cm.sup.1 became dominant. Hence, the ionic bonding of Cu.sup.2+ ions and NO.sub.3.sup. ions was weakened by the interaction with hydrogen bonding of water as the solvent remaining in the polymer electrolyte membrane, consequently decreasing the stretching frequency.

TEST EXAMPLE 2

TGA

[0088] The thermal stability of a polymer electrolyte was evaluated using TGA. TGA was performed at a heating rate of 10 C./min using a Mettler Toledo TGA device. The results are shown in FIG. 3. Based on the results of TGA of the neat POZ and the POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 (1:0.7 molar ratio), the neat POZ showed a weight reduction of 78% in the range from 0 C. to 100 C. This is due to the evaporation of water from the neat POZ film. In contrast, when Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was incorporated into the POZ polymer as in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, the evaporation of water progressed at a high temperature of 100 C. or more, which is considered to be due to the solvation of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 by water. An increase in the decomposition temperature in the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention is deemed to be because of the strong interaction between copper ions and water.

[0089] The boiling point of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is known to be 170 C. In the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, a weight reduction of 20% at about 170 C. is considered to be due to Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2. Because of the decomposition of the polymer, all samples showed a weight reduction at about 400 C. Based on the above results, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 had no interaction with POZ, and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was solvated by water, whereby the decomposition temperature of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 and water was increased.

TEST EXAMPLE 3

FT-Raman

[0090] In the polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention, the formation of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 into ionic aggregates having a relatively large size in the POZ polymer, compared to free ions or ion pairs, was evaluated through FT-Raman. The results are illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5.

[0091] NO.sub.3.sup. is known to show stretching bands 1034, 1040 and 1045 cm.sup.1. As illustrated in FIG. 4, when Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was incorporated into the POZ polymer, the number of NO.sub.3.sup. molecules was negligibly increased from 1045.5 to 1047.5 cm.sup.1, which means that Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 that incorporated into POZ is mainly present as ionic aggregates.

[0092] When Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 is incorporated into the POZ polymer chain, the relative ratio of free ions, ion pairs and aggregates is illustrated in FIG. 5. There were no peaks at 1029 and 1034 cm.sup.1. Peaks at these locations are due to the free ions and the ion pairs. As illustrated in FIG. 5, respective peak areas of the free ions, ion pairs, and ionic aggregates were 14.829, 15.664 and 69.501%. Therefore, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was present as higher-order ionic aggregates, rather than as free ions or ion pairs, in the POZ polymer. The ionic aggregates were dispersed in the polymer chain in the membrane of the invention.

TEST EXAMPLE 4

Permeance of POZ/Cu(NO.SUB.3.).SUB.2 .Polymer Electrolyte Membrane

[0093] A polymer electrolyte membrane including the Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 aggregates as the transport barrier in the membrane for SF.sub.6 separation was manufactured according to the present invention. The polymer electrolyte membrane according to the present invention was manufactured by preparing a POZ solution containing Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, followed by coating a polysulfone macroporous support therewith, and drying it, in the same manner as in a typical process for forming a planar type membrane. FIG. 6 illustrates the SEM image of the membrane manufactured as above. When the polymer electrolyte solution was applied and dried on the support, the final thickness (excluding the support) was about 1 m.

[0094] The SF.sub.6 separation performance of the polymer electrolyte membranes according to the present invention, composed of POZ and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 at different molar ratios, was measured. The results are given in Table 1 below. At respective molar ratios (1:0.5 and 1:0.7), the N.sub.2 gas permeance values were about 4.2 and 11.2 GPU, and the SF.sub.6 gas permeance values were about 0.7 and 0.4 GPU.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 gas permeance mol ratio (GPU) selectivity (POZ:Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2) N.sub.2 SF.sub.6 (N.sub.2/SF.sub.6) 1:0.5 4.2 0.7 6.0 1:0.7 11.2 0.4 28.0

[0095] The polymer electrolyte membrane comprising POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 at a molar ratio of 1:0.7 exhibited high N.sub.2 permeance and low SF.sub.6 permeance. Although not shown in the above table, SF.sub.6 gas permeance after two days was lowered to about 0.2 GPU. The polymer electrolyte membrane comprising POZ/Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 at a molar ratio of 1:0.7 manifested a N.sub.2/SF.sub.6 gas selectivity of 28.0. As for the high N.sub.2/SF.sub.6 selectivity, when Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was solvated by water, repulsive force was increased between the negative charges of water and the F atoms of SF.sub.6, and the barrier effect of Cu.sup.2+ ions was increased.

TEST EXAMPLE 5

Test for Various Cations

[0096] In order to evaluate the SF.sub.6 separation effect using the nitrate containing various cations, as shown in Table 2 below, the polymer membranes were manufactured using POZ (poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)) as the polymer and the nitrate electrolyte containing various cations, and the permeance of N.sub.2 and SF.sub.6 was measured, and the theoretical selectivity (N.sub.2/SF.sub.6) was calculated. The results are given in Table 2 below. In the testing, the polymer and the nitrate at a fixed molar ratio of 1:0.7 were mixed in the solvent, after which the resulting mixture was cast and dried on the polysulfone porous support, thus forming films.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 SF.sub.6 N.sub.2 Selectivity Nitrate Permeance Permeance (N.sub.2/SF.sub.6) 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate 3.5 29.5 8.4 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate 2.9 27.3 9.4 Aluminum nitrate nonahydrate 6.1 23.5 3.9 Ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate 6.4 38.1 6.0 Ammonium nitrate 1.9 15.2 8 Barium nitrate 1.2 15.1 12.6 Beryllium nitrate 0.9 16.2 18 Calcium nitrate hydrate 4.5 31.8 7.1 Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate 1.8 31.2 17.3 Cerium(III) nitrate hexahydrate 3.2 37.8 11.8 Cesium nitrate 2.9 38.8 13.4 Chromium(III) nitrate nonahydrate 2 28.1 14.1 Cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate 5.1 16.2 3.2 Copper(II) nitrate 3.7 18.7 5.1 hemi(pentahydrate) Copper(II) nitrate hydrate 0.7 19.2 27.4 Copper(II) nitrate trihydrate 5.2 27.2 5.2 Iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate 4.5 18.5 4.1 Lead(II) nitrate 2.6 20.2 7.8 Lithium nitrate 1.1 16.5 15 Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate 3.2 17.2 5.4 Manganese(II) nitrate hydrate 4.9 25.6 5.2 Nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate 0.8 19.2 24.0 Palladium(II) nitrate 0.6 20.9 34.8 Palladium(II) nitrate dihydrate 1.5 17.5 11.7 Palladium(II) nitrate hydrate 6.8 39.5 5.8 Potassium nitrate 1.6 24.4 15.3 Silver nitrate 1.8 28.4 15.78 Sodium nitrate 5.4 48.9 9.06

[0097] As is apparent from the above results, the selectivity varied depending on the kind of nitrate, but such nitrates could be used to separate SF.sub.6.

TEST EXAMPLE 6

Test for Nitrate Cu(NO.SUB.3.).SUB.2 .and Various Polymers

[0098] In order to evaluate the polymer effect in the polymer electrolyte layer, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was used as the nitrate, and various polymers were used, thus preparing polymer electrolyte membranes, the permeance of N.sub.2 and SF.sub.6 and theoretical selectivity of which were calculated. The results are given in Table 3 below. In the testing, the polymer and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 at a fixed molar ratio of 1:0.7 were mixed in the solvent, after which the resulting mixture was cast and dried on the polysulfone porous support, thus forming films.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 N.sub.2 Selectivity Polymer SF.sub.6 Permeance Permeance (N.sub.2/SF.sub.6) Cellulose, ethyl hydroxyethyl ether 0.32 9.24 28.88 Cellulose, hydroxyethyl ether 0.26 8.24 31.69 Cellulose, methyl hydroxyethyl ether 0.94 18.24 19.40 Poly(1-glycerol methacrylate) 3.15 15.32 4.86 Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) 1.11 16.24 14.63 Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/methacrylic 2.5 22.5 9 acid) Poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) 2.1 21.22 10.10 Poly(2-methacryloxyethyltrimethylammonium 5.12 35.21 6.88 bromide) Poly(2-vinyl-1-methylpyridinium bromide) 6.12 30.56 4.99 Poly(2-vinylpyridine N-oxide) 4.21 41.22 9.79 Poly(2-vinylpyridine) 3.65 30.62 8.39 Poly(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl-2- 4.12 19.21 4.66 methacryloxyethyldimethylammonium chloride) Poly(4-vinylpyridine N-oxide) 4.23 19.66 4.65 Poly(4-vinylpyridine) 6.65 34.65 5.21 Poly(acrylamide/2- 1.57 24.66 15.71 methacryloxyethyltrimethylammonium bromide) Poly(acrylamide/acrylic acid) 2.01 20.21 10.05 Poly(acrylic acid) 5.16 24.15 4.68 Poly(allyl amine) 1.24 32.54 26.24 Poly(butadiene/maleic acid) 2.55 36.25 14.22 Poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) 4.21 34.54 8.20 Poly(ethyl acrylate/acrylic acid) 4.42 27.78 6.29 Poly(ethylene oxide) 2.14 35.65 16.66 Poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide) 6.27 27.65 4.41 Poly(ethylene/acrylic acid) 1.94 19.24 9.92 Poly(1-lysine hydrobromide) 1.21 35.15 29.05 Poly(maleic acid) 6.45 32.15 4.98 Poly(methacrylic acid) 1.06 28.35 26.75 Poly(n-butyl acrylate/2- 1.45 28.64 19.75 methacryloxyethyltrimethyl ammonium bromide) Poly(N-methyl N-vinyl acetamide) homopolymer 1.64 37.52 22.88 Poly(N-vinyl acetamide) 0.61 15.22 24.95 Poly(N-vinyl acetamide-co-sodium acrylate) 2.15 21.36 9.93 Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) 6.12 15.26 2.49 Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone/2-dimethylaminoethyl 6.54 40.84 6.24 methacrylate), dimethyl sulfate quaternary Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate) 4.65 19.54 4.20 Poly(oxyethylene) 6.12 48.73 7.96 Poly(styrenesulfonic acid) 3.15 24.26 7.70 Poly(styrenesulfonic acid/maleic acid), sodium 1.26 38.9 30.87 salt Poly(styrenesulfonic acid/maleic acid) 0.65 10.32 15.88 Poly(vinyl acetate) 0.05 2.15 43.00 Poly(vinyl alcohol), N-methyl-4(4- 1.95 19.65 10.08 formylstyryl)pyridinium methosulfate acetal Poly(vinyl alcohol) 3.99 16.28 4.08 Poly(vinyl methyl ether) 1.55 15.32 9.88 Poly(vinyl phosphoric acid), sodium salt 3.11 30.65 9.86 Poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride 0.87 12.12 13.93 Poly(vinylphosphonic acid) 1.98 25.26 12.76 Poly(vinylsulfonic acid) 5.11 16.24 3.18 Polyacrylamide 5.12 15.26 2.98 Polymethacrylamide 2.32 34.55 14.89 Polypropylene, Isotactic 1.21 26.25 21.69

[0099] As is apparent from the above results, SF.sub.6 separation was possible when using polymer electrolyte membranes comprising various polymers and Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 manufactured by the method of the invention.

[0100] Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and substitutions are possible, without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as disclosed in the accompanying claims.