FUEL SENSOR FOR A VARIABLE-BLEND NATURAL GAS APPLIANCE USING THE WOBBE INDEX
20170101947 ยท 2017-04-13
Inventors
Cpc classification
F02D41/0027
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B60H2001/2246
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60K2015/0321
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F02D41/263
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B60H1/2206
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60H2001/224
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60K2015/03013
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
F02D41/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/26
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A system and method for configuring parameters for a variable gaseous appliance, comprise a sensor for detecting a composition of the gaseous fuel in a fuel tank. A first set of instructions are executable on a processor for receiving a signal from the sensor and analyzing the gaseous fuel based on the Wobbe Index, methane index, and inert gas percentage, to produce a gaseous fuel analysis. A second set of instructions are executable on the processor for producing a signal for configuring parameters of the engine for running the engine based on the gaseous fuel analysis.
Claims
1. A method for configuring parameters for a gas appliance for variable gaseous fuels, comprising: detecting a composition of the gaseous fuel using a sensor; receiving a signal from the sensor; analyzing the gaseous fuel based on one or more values of interest, the values of interest including Wobbe Index, methane index, and inert gas percentage, to produce a gaseous fuel analysis; and producing a signal for configuring parameters of the gas appliance for running the gas appliance based on the gaseous fuel analysis.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of analyzing is performed by a learning-artificial intelligence module.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the gas appliance comprises an HVAC.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the gas appliance comprises an automobile engine in an automobile.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the values of interest are derived by an artificial intelligence module that is readable by an ECU in the automobile, the artificial intelligence module capable of deriving said values of interest from one or more measurable physical properties of gaseous fuel selected from the type consisting of: thermal conductivity, infrared absorbance, mass density, pressure, temperature and mole density.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor comprises an infrared detector.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor comprises a thermal conductivity detector.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensor comprises a mole density detector.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the gaseous fuel may comprise one or more mixtures of gaseous fuel having one or more BTU contents.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the gaseous fuel analysis is based one or more RNG composition databases.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising placing the sensor in a fuel tank of a vehicle.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprising placing the sensor in a chamber that is spliced in-line with a fuel line.
13. The method of claim 1, further comprising reading the values of interest from a database in real time to perform the analyzing of the gaseous fuel.
14. The method of claim 13, comprising updating measurable physical properties based on the composition of the gaseous fuel detected by the sensor.
15. The method of claim 14, analyzing and updating the values of interest in the database using an artificial intelligence module based on the step of updating the measurable physical properties.
16. A system for configuring parameters for a variable gas appliance, comprising: a sensor for detecting a composition of the gaseous fuel in a fuel tank; a processor; a first set of instructions executable on the processor for receiving a signal from the sensor and analyzing the gaseous fuel based on the Wobbe Index, methane index, and inert gas percentage, to produce a gaseous fuel analysis; and a second set of instructions executable on the processor for producing a signal for configuring parameters of the gas appliance for running the gas appliance based on the gaseous fuel analysis.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor includes a learning artificial intelligence module.
18. The system of claim 16, wherein the gas appliance comprises an HVAC.
19. The system of claim 16, wherein the gas appliance comprises an automobile engine in an automobile.
20. The system of claim 19, wherein one or more values of interest are derived by an artificial intelligence module in an ECU in the automobile, the artificial intelligence module capable of deriving said values of interest from one or more measurable physical properties of gaseous fuel selected from the type consisting of: thermal conductivity, infrared absorbance, mass density, pressure, temperature and mole density.
21. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor comprises an infrared detector.
22. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor comprises a thermal conductivity detector.
23. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor comprises a mole density detector.
24. The system of claim 16, wherein the gaseous fuel comprises one or more mixtures of gaseous fuel having one or more BTU contents.
25. The system of claim 16, wherein the gaseous fuel analysis is based one or more RNG composition databases.
26. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor is in a fuel tank of a vehicle.
27. The system of claim 16, wherein the sensor is in a chamber that is spliced in-line with a fuel line.
28. The system of claim 16, wherein the values of interest are stored in a database capable of being read in real time to perform the analyzing of the gaseous fuel.
29. The system of claim 28, wherein one or more measurable physical properties are capable of being updated based on the composition of the gaseous fuel detected by the sensor.
30. The system of claim 29, wherein an artificial intelligence module is capable of analyzing and updating one or more values of interest in the database based on the measurable physical properties.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying figures where:
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0019] For illustrative purposes, the present invention is embodied in the apparatus and method generally shown and described herein with reference to
Introduction
[0020] Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) is an important alternative fuel that can contribute to achieving a number of goals set by local and national governments related to conventional fuel replacement and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction in the transportation sector. Natural gas vehicles (NGVs) have achieved reasonable market penetration over the past decade. However, significant increase in the number of NGVs running on RNG is needed in order to make an impact on net GHG emissions. Most RNG projects are small to medium scale by nature and comprehensive gas cleanup/upgrading to meet NGV fuel specifications is often not feasible from a project economics perspective. This results in most RNG resources being left undeveloped or wasted, such as in the case of landfill gas flaring. Developing NGVs that are capable of accepting a broader range of RNG fuel properties can help achieve widespread RNG usage for transportation. The typical calorific value of RNG from biogas or landfill gas projects is around 50-60% of equal volume fossil Natural Gas (NG). Table 1 (from A. J. Bruijstens et al. Biogas composition and engine performance, including database and biogas property model Stockholm: Biogasmax (2008)) shows the composition of RNG from the various source along with conventional NG.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Characteristics of different high methane fuels Type of fuel Biogas Natural Gas (fossil) CH.sub.4 50-75% 97% CH.sub.4 CO.sub.2 25-50% N.sub.2 0-10% 0.4% H.sub.2 0-1% H.sub.2S 0-3% O.sub.2 0-0.5% C.sub.2+ 2.6% Wobbe Index 25-45 ~50 (MJ/m.sup.3)
[0021] A rugged, cost effective sensor produces signals that are interpreted using chemo-metric methods. The signals from the sensor are indexed and the Wobbe Index is indirectly determined in real time. In one embodiment, the accuracy of the sensor, based on the performance on other automotive sensors (ex., oxygen sensor), is at least within 5% of the actual Wobbe Indices.
[0022] The Wobbe Index may be a critical factor in evaluating the interchangeability between different high methane fuels, and the present invention uses a Wobbe Index sensor for use in NGVs. In one embodiment, invention uses a combination of a thermal conductivity and an infrared sensor together with temperature and pressure measurement. The signals from these sensors are indexed in a method that estimates the Wobbe Index in real time. For example, in one embodiment of the sensor was confirmed to operate over a temperature range of 20 C. to 70 C. under pressures of up to 3600 psi. A multivariate method estimates the fuel Wobbe Index from the measured temperature, pressure and thermal conductivity data.
[0023] The accuracy was improved to 1% using the CH.sub.4 concentration data from the infrared (IR) sensor additionally. Compared to the existing methods, this sensor provides a cost-effective, ruggedized solution that can be used in a variable-blend natural gas vehicle (VNGV), allowing refueling from a broad range of natural gas sources. This new sensor may to significantly increase RNG usage for transportation purposes.
[0024] Commercially available Wobbe Index measurement techniques typically involve bulky, complex and expensive analyzers. These devices measure the energy content of the fuel through direct combustion (calorimetry) and separately measure fuel density using optical methods. Past efforts to develop a portable Wobbe Index analyzer have also relied on direct calorific value measurement in a catalytic combustion chamber followed by sample density measurement. Such analyzers would be difficult to use in some embodiments, because they are bulky, and provide for a slow analysis. In addition, there may be safety concerns with using calorimetric analysis and there may be reliability issues in the harsh automotive environment.
System Architecture
[0025] The sensor provides the measurement of a multiple set of indirect variables to find the relationships between the indirect variables and the Wobbe Index. The higher number of independent variables, which provide different responses to the fuel composition changes, results the better prediction. In addition to the pressure and temperature measurement of the fuel, thermal methane fuels. A key enabling technology required to develop VNGVs is an on-line fuel Wobbe Index sensor that can measure the fuel's index in real time.
[0026] With reference to
[0027] In one embodiment, the second set of instructions 32 may include, in the signal 36 sent to, the engine parameters for adjusting the ignition timing of the engine 50 based on the CH.sub.4 content.
[0028]
[0029] The system and method herein provides a new operating mode for NGV engines, HVAC, and natural gas appliances, which can combust the unprocessed RNG (RNG with CO.sub.2), where the EGR is process is removed or minimized.
[0030] Table 2 below shows the composition of typical RNG from two different sources along with conventional natural gas.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Composition of typical RNG from two different sources along with conventional natural gas Biogas 1 Biogas 2 Natural Types of RNG Household waste Agrifood industry gas Composition 60% CH4 68% CH4 97% CH4 33% CO2 26% CO2 2.2% C2 1% N2 1% N2 0.3% C3 0% O2 0% O2 0.1% C4+ 6% H2O 5% H2O 0.4% N2 Caloric Value 6.0 6.8 10.3 kWh/m3 Density 0.93 0.85 0.57 Mass (kg/m3) 1.21 1.11 0.73 Wobbe Number 6.9 8.1 14.9
[0031] EGR equipped engines, for example, utilize between 0-25% of the exhaust flow. The 25% EGR matches well with RNG inert CO.sub.2 composition which is in between 26% to 33% (see table above). Fossil based NG has no measurable CO.sub.2. (See Table 2 above).
[0032] With reference back to
[0033] In one embodiment, the sensor 102 may measure of a multiple set of indirect variables to find the relationships between the indirect variables and the Wobbe Index, Methane Index, and inert gas composition. The higher number of independent variables, which provide different responses to the fuel composition changes, results, the better the prediction. In addition to the pressure and temperature measurement of the fuel, thermal conductivity and/or point infrared sensors were selected as candidate technologies, since these measurements are proven reliability in the temperature range of 20 C. to 50 C. and pressures of up to 3600 psi, which is the common specification as the automotive application. Table 3 summarizes the characteristics of two types of sensors: thermal conductivity detectors, and point infrared detectors.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Characteristics of candidate sensors. Gas sensor type Benefits Issues Thermal Can measures concentrations High gas concentration Conductivity of gas mixtures even in the only. Limited range of absence of oxygen. gases. Fragile (wire type). Point Selective measurement Low sensitivity. Higher Infrared to the certain species. cost than Thermal Can be used in inert Conductivity. Sensor with atmospheres. Can be located the gas cell cannot be used inside the fuel tank/fuel line because of pressure rating
Thermal Conductivity Detectors
[0034] A thermal conductivity detector (TCD) measures the thermal conductivities of the gas. This detector contains a sensing element (typically filament or film) that is heated electrically so that it is hotter than the surrounding gas. The temperature difference between the surrounding gas and sensor is directly related to thermal conductivity of the gas.
[0035] Since the thermal conductivity of CH.sub.4 is almost twice as high as that of CO.sub.2, it can be used as the major indexing signal that distinguishes RNG from conventional NG. TCDs can operate over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. The operating temperature and pressure range of a typical TCD covers and exceeds the required parameter range for the use as the sensor 10.
[0036] The major advantages of TCD for the current application as the VNGV sensor 10 are: [0037] Hot film anemometer, a technology similar to TCD, is widely used as mass air flow sensor in automotive applications, proving the cost-effectiveness, ruggedness, and reliability of the TCD technology. [0038] Routine calibration is not required and the sensor is virtually maintenance free. [0039] It can operate in continuous presence of gases in pressurized environments, and covers wide temperature ranges. [0040] It has a universal response to the all gas species. This characteristic, when combined with a specific detector such as the infrared sensor, provides an excellent chemo-metric analysis option.
[0041] The only concern with using a TCD-type sensor is that it may be prone to surface oxidation due to residual oxidative impurities such as trace oxygen in the fuel mix. However, this concern can be reduced by using tungsten-rhenium as the sensing material, since it provides a chemically passivated layer on the sensing element.
Infrared Detectors
[0042] Infrared (IR) absorption technology based gas analysis has been used successfully for decades. Similar to TCDs, there is no chemical reaction between the gas and the sensor element in IR sensors. They are less susceptible to long-term drift and unlike chemical sensors, are resistant to contamination. Because of these properties, IR absorption sensors can operate over a wide range of temperatures as long as the sensor material is chemically and physically stable throughout the operating temperature range. The typical operating temperature range of 20 C. to 70 C. meets target temperature range required for the current application.
[0043] Infrared gas detection is based upon the ability of some gases to absorb IR radiation. Most hydrocarbons, including methane, absorb IR radiation at approximately 3.4 mm in wavelength whereas H.sub.2O and CO.sub.2 are relatively transparent in this region. Therefore, a dedicated configuration operating at this wavelength can be used to detect CH.sub.4.
[0044] The major advantages of IR gas detectors 9 for the current application are: [0045] Immunity to contamination and poisoning. [0046] Routine calibration is not required and the sensor is virtually maintenance free. [0047] Ability to operate in the absence of oxygen or air. [0048] Can operate in continuous presence of gases in pressurized environments. [0049] Can be calibrated to response to specific species such as CH.sub.4. This characteristics, when combined with a non-specific detector such as TCD, provides an excellent chemo-metric analysis option.
[0050] The drawback is that the IR sensors may have a high initial cost. IR sensors 9 have in the past been more expensive than other types of sensors, but their price is rapidly decreasing.
[0051] A commercially available point type infrared gas sensor from the Dynament Ltd, UK, may be used and was selected for testing. The maximum operating pressure of an IR absorption sensor is determined by the sealing or encapsulating techniques used to integrate the sensor to the fuel tank or fuel line. The pressure rating of the infrared window of the sensor element does not influence the maximum operating pressure since the inside of the window is pressurized by the same environment as the outside during operation. In testing, the sensors are located inside the fuel tank, and sealing was performed by blazing followed by thermal compression with high pressure electrical feed-thru. This type of sealing can easily withstand the proposed maximum operating pressure of 3600 psi.
Tested Installation
[0052] A sensor testing setup, including a manifold, was tested with a miniature stainless steel gas tank. The entire setup was located within a temperature controlled chamber. Characteristics of the components used in this setup are summarized in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Specification of sensors and components used in this study. Part Name Part Number Vendor Specs Double-Ended 316L-HDF4- Swagelok 316L SS Double-Ended Cylinder 300 DOT-Compliant Sample Cylinder, 1/4 in. FNPT, 300 cm3, 4000 psig. Thermal N/A In-House TCD, TUNGSTEN- Conductivity (by Bourns RHENIUM Film and Sensor Inc.) Filament (Copper seal) on Alumina Substrate Premier Dual Gas MSH- Dynament Methane from 0 to 100% IR SENSOR DP/HC/CO2/P Inc. volume with 0.1% volume FOR HCs and resolution, 0-2% volume CO2 propane, 0-5% CO2 with 0.01% resolution.
[0053] With reference to
[0054] With reference to
[0055] With reference to
Sensor Signal Interpretation to Wobbe Index
[0056] Parameters including fuel temperature, fuel pressure, TCD sensor output and IR sensor output were measured during testing. For the Thermal conductivity value, resistance of the TCD sensor at varying current that flows to the sensor was measured using a 4-probe digital ohm meter with constant current source (HIOKI PS100). The resistance of the TCD at zero current was measured and used to calculate the temperature of the gas since the resistance of the filament is directly proportional to the temperature of the surrounding gas under given conditions.
[0057] The Wobbe Indices of four different gas mixtures were measured during the experiments:
[0058] 1. Industrial grade methane which has a purity of 99.99%.
[0059] 2. A mixture of 95% CH.sub.4, 4% ethane and 1% CO.sub.2, which represents fossil NG.
[0060] 3. A mixture of 60% CH.sub.4, 39% CO.sub.2, and 1% N.sub.2, which represents RNG from household waste.
[0061] 4. A mixture of 80% CH.sub.4, 18% CO.sub.2, 1% O.sub.2, 1% N.sub.2, which represents a median between the NG and RNG.
[0062] These are reported in the literature. All of the mixture gas was obtained as calibration gas grade bottle, traceable to the ASTM standard gas, which enables the providing of the actual Wobble Index from the ASPEN HYSYS fluid property model.
[0063] The relationship between temperature and resistance can be expressed as a simplified Callendar-Van Dusen equation:
R.sub.T=R.sub.0(1+T) (Equation 1)
Where:
[0064] R.sub.T=Resistance it temperature T()
[0065] R.sub.0=Resistance at T=0 C.()
[0066] =Temperature coefficient T=0 C.(// C.)
[0067] R.sub.0 and values were measured to 30.190.11 and (32.40.23)10.sup.4 // C. respectively with a 95% confidence level. From the equation, the gas temperature was calculated with a 1 C. accuracy without use of any additional temperature sensors. A commercially available pressure transducer (Omega Inc.) was used to measure the fuel pressure. The IR sensor 9 was calibrated for all anticipated CH.sub.4 concentrations.
[0068] The Wobbe Index of the mixture gas was estimated using a four dimensional curve fitting algorithm. The Multiple Linear Regression method was derived using the multi variate analysis (MVA) function of MATLAB, which is a commercially available data analysis software package from The MathWorks, Inc. of Natick, Mass., United States.
[0069] The Wobbe Index, WI, can be derived as follows.
WI=f(P,T,E1,E2)(Equation 2)
Where:
[0070] f(P, T, E1, E2)=4 dimensional curve fitting equation
[0071] T=Temperature
[0072] P=Pressure
[0073] E1=TCD sensor signal
[0074] E2=IR sensor signal
[0075] The Wobbe Indices of the gas mixtures were also calculated using the Aspen HYSYS10 fluid property model with the Non-Random-Two-Liquid (NRTL) equation as the basis for calculations. Since this calculation is based on the known gas composition of calibration gas, it provides the verification of the accuracy of proposed measurement. The calculated Wobbe Indices were found to be in the same range as the values reported in literature.
Test Results
[0076]
[0077] The plot shows that as the pressure increases, the measured resistance drops, implying reduced sensitivity (slope of the Resistance vs Current curve) in the resistance measurement. This behavior is expected, since under higher pressures, higher population of the gas molecules, which act as a heat carrier, lead to reduced sensitivity, (i.e. less difference in resistance among different gases). Based on this behavior, it is recommended that the sensor be located in the place with lower fuel pressure, such as downstream of fuel pressure regulator, instead of directly locating inside of the fuel tank.
[0078] It should be noted that there is no measurable difference than 1% in the resistance of the gas mixtures until the TCD excitation current is increased to around 50 mA. This is true for all the different pressures.
[0079]
[0080]
Y=(0.0102P.sup.2105T3.701P.sup.2155)R+347.85P.sup.090(Equation 3)
[0081] Where:
[0082] Y is the Wobbe Index (MJ/Nm3),
[0083] P is the pressure in psi,
[0084] T is the temperature in Celsius, and
[0085] R is the TCD resistance in ohms.
[0086] Real Wobbe Index values obtained from the ASPEN analysis from the gas composition for the 4 set of the gas mixture are also shown as square dot in
[0087] Estimation of the Wobbe Index by the TCD sensor rely on the fact that CH.sub.4 has the highest thermal conductivity among the components present in the gas mixtures and it constitutes the major component in the natural gas. However, with reference back to the process 200 in
[0088] The corrected Wobbe Index is:
Where:
[0089] W is the corrected Wobbe Index (MJ/Nm3),
[0090] X is the signal from IR sensor in methane mode in CH.sub.4%
[0091] C is a correction coefficient summarized in below.
[0092] If the X is in the range of 100-90, C=50
[0093] If the X is in the range of 89-70, C=35
[0094] If the X is in the range of 69-50, C=20
[0095] Y is the Wobbe Index from the equation (3).
[0096] To summarize, a Wobbe Index sensor for use in NGVs was designed and successfully calibrated using four different gas mixtures. The system uses a combination of a TCD and an IR sensor 9 and the signals from the sensor are indexed in an algorithm that estimates the Wobbe Index in real time. This system is a major step towards significantly increasing RNG use in transportation sector. The sensor 102 was confirmed to operate over at least a temperature range of 20 C. to 70 C. under pressures of at least up to 3600 psi. The AI 250 may include a multivariate algorithm (205 in
[0097] The VNGV engine system of
[0098] The AI module 250 may use the sensor 102 to estimate the fuel property, which is called a Value of Interest (WI, MI, and % Inert) in the AI learning model or neural network. Based on the Value of Interest model 210 created by the artificial intelligence/neural network (AI) system 250 of
[0099] Further, in one embodiment, the ECU itself include the AI system 250 itself to store and use data on new fuel mixtures that may be found from time to time. In one embodiment, the ECU 30 may collect data from both the sensor 102 and the AI system 250 in the analysis to create control signals 36 to the engine 50, HVAC or appliance.
[0100] The AI system 250 may use the thermal conductivity data of the Measurable physical Properties to estimate the WI within 5% accuracy using a simple regression method 205 as shown in
[0101] The number of Measurable Physical Property parameters 202 is also increased in the one embodiment. Sonic orifice in the fuel line may be used to estimate the mass density along with the molar density of the gas by measuring pressure, temperature and thermal conductivity of the fuel.
[0102] A target accuracy to achieve is +/1% rel. and stability of +/0.5% rel. for all three Values of Interest 210 leads to satisfactory engine performance during variable blended fuel operation in an engine 50. Optimum combustion phasing may be ensured so there is no impact on brake specific energy consumption with feedback from the fuel sensor and closed loop combustion control. A system using multivariate analysis and ANN allows creation of an accurate model that estimates the three Values of Interest 210 from fuel properties collected from the sensor 102 and develop an accurate on-board fuel property detection system. Risks of incorrect prediction of Value of Interest can be minimized by addition of commercially available engine/powertrain sensors such as intake and exhaust gas sensors or measuring infrared gas absorbance.
Database
[0103] With reference back to
[0104] Measurable Physical Properties 202 of each blended fuel mixture at varying pressures and temperatures may be estimated using CHEMKIN, a well-known software tool that can use compositional information to estimate transport properties of the gas mixture, including thermal conductivity, mass/mole density and infrared absorbance.
[0105] The Value of Interest (WI, MI) 210 for each case may be estimated using Aspen Plus simulation model from the known compositional information. Inert gas composition is directly collected without relying on simulation.
[0106] An MVA and ANN model 250 that describes the relationships between Measurable Physical Properties 202 and the Values of Interest 210 may use tools such as CAMO Unscrambler or MATLAB w/ Chemo-metric Toolbox. The most efficient and economical way of collecting Measurable Physical Properties 202 to achieve desired target performance can then be identified.
[0107] The various embodiments described above are provided by way of illustration only, and should not be construed to limit the invention. Those skilled in the art will readily recognize various modifications and changes that may be made to the claimed invention without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described herein, and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the claimed invention, which is set forth in the following claims.