Method to homogenize the tube temperatures between tubes during processes involving heating of gas flowing in the tubes
09579620 · 2017-02-28
Assignee
- L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme Pour L'Étude Et L'Exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude (Paris, FR)
Inventors
- Jean Gallarda (Joinville le Pont, FR)
- Frederic Camy-Perret (Paris, FR)
- Julien Cances (Frankfurt-am-Main, DE)
- Antoine HSU (Paris, FR)
- Jacques Segret (Paris, FR)
- Daniel Gary (Montigny le Bretonneux, FR)
- Patrice Levee (Maurepas, FR)
- Antonio COSCIA (Hadamar, DE)
- Dirck Simons (Zandhoven, BE)
Cpc classification
C01B2203/1017
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/0233
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J2219/2401
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/0013
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2208/025
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J8/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for decreasing the spread of the tube temperatures between tubes in a process involving the heating of at least one fluid in a furnace that comprises at least one radiation chamber with radiant walls, at least one essentially vertical row of tubes inside of which circulate the at least one fluid to be heated, and being equipped with burners that heat the tubes, where the method comprises the steps of: determining, for each of the tubes the skin temperature of the tube, selecting the 50% tubes having the lowest temperatures determined, the process being stopped, realizing on each tube selected an operation that decreases the flow of the fluid distributed to said tube while keeping the total flow rate of the fluid unchanged.
Claims
1. A method to homogenize the tube temperatures between tubes in a process involving the heating of at least one fluid in a furnace that contains at least one radiation chamber with radiant walls, at least one essentially vertical row of tubes inside of which circulate the at least one fluid to be heated, and whereby said radiation chamber is equipped with burners that are used in the form of rows, whereby the at least one fluid to be heated is distributed uniformly to the tubes, and whereby the burners heat the tubes, the method comprising the steps of: a) determining the temperature of each tube; b) selecting the 50% tubes having the lowest temperatures as determined according to step a); c) realizing on each tube selected during step b) an operation that decreases the flow of the fluid distributed, entering in said tube; and d) keeping the total flow rate of the fluid unchanged, therefore distributing uniformly increased flow to the remaining tubes.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the temperatures of the tubes are determined by a simulation of the behavior of the furnace during said process involving the heating of at least one fluid.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the temperatures of the tubes are determined by measuring the skin temperature of the tubes by pyrometer measurement.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the operation realized on the tubes selected during step b) comprises increasing the pressure drop of said 50% tubes having the lowest tube temperatures.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the pressure drop is increased by installing elements in each of the individual tubes having the lowest temperature selected in step b), said elements that induces pressure drop being sized so that the flow distribution is the one required by step d) of the method.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the process uses tubes filled with catalyst.
7. The method according to claim 5, wherein said elements installed to increase the pressure drop are elements based on calibrated orifices that are installed at the inlet of the tube.
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein said elements installed in each of the individual tubes selected in step b) are individually adjusted catalyst packed bed inside the tubes, including additional catalyst bed height.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said elements installed in each of the individual tubes selected in step b) are individually filled catalyst packed bed inside the tubes with part of the catalyst packed bed height composed of a different kind of pellets with higher pressure drop characteristics relatively to the catalyst filled in the non selected tubes.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the process is a synthesis gas production process by steam methane reforming of a hydrocarbon feedstock using tubes filled with catalyst and where the at least one fluid distributed uniformly to the tubes is a mixture containing at least said hydrocarbon feedstock together with steam.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, claims, and accompanying drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only several embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope as it can admit to other equally effective embodiments.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(15) The hereafter example refers to an industrial side fired reformer for a production of a synthesis gas for a final CO production. The furnace contains 32 tubes (two sections of 16 tubes); improving temperature distribution in a plant producing CO will allow either to increase operating temperature (5 to 10 C.) and thus to make CO production more efficient or to increase tubes life at same operating temperature. As a matter of fact, most of the time, the performances of CO plants are limited by the operating temperature.
(16)
(17) (1): SMR3D computation at peephole level;
(18) (2): SMR3D computation max, which represents the maximum tube temperature for each tube (which takes also into account the perturbation induced by the peep hole)
(19) (3): measurements made using a pyrometer;
(20) The comparison between the values measured or calculated shows that despite some differences, comparable trends are observed.
(21)
(22) This determination of the heat flux received by the tubes has been obtained by computation; as seen above on
(23) According to the invention, these 50% tubes are cooled down by receiving a higher feed flow.
(24) As described previously, the recirculation effect due to flue gas convergence implies that the tubes between the burner columns are more heated than those in front of the burners. This is also clearly visible on
(25) The overall furnace is operated under the constraint of the hottest tube that should not exceed the design temperature.
(26) By applying the method of the invention, the distribution of the process gas flow in the tubes is adjusted in order to reduce temperature differences tube to tube while keeping the total flow unchanged: the feed gas flow rate is increased in the more heated tubes, and is decreased in the less heated ones.
(27)
(28) Table 1 illustrates the homogenization of the tube temperatures.
(29) TABLE-US-00001 Tube temperatures Ref Tuned (Ref Tuned) Maximum temperature [ C.] 976 968 8 Diff Tmax-Tmin [ C.] 28 14 14
(30)
(31) Table 2 illustrates the homogenization of the syngas temperatures.
(32) TABLE-US-00002 Syngas temperatures Ref Tuned (Ref Tuned) Average syngas temperature [ C.] 925 925 0 Diff Tmax-Tmin [ C.] 29 21 8
(33) According to the simulation performed: maximum tube temperature Tmax is reduced by 8 C.; a good temperature homogenization is expected, temperature spread (TmaxTmin) is divided by two (28.fwdarw.14 C.); there is no impact on syngas production flow rate and not noticeable impact on syngas temperature (925 C.).
(34) This should allow increasing tube lifetime or running the furnace at higher temperature level, i.e. higher performances.
(35) In this example, the solution of the invention utilized for individually controlling the flow rate inside the tubes is the implementation of differential pressure drop elements in the 50% identified cold tubes. This implementation is advantageous as it allows being self-adaptable to the furnace load.
(36) A description of the solution that was chosen in the case of the example is provided below; various other technical solutions can be utilized to implement step c) of the invention, and several will also be briefly described later in the text.
(37) The furnace of the example is a usual side fired furnace with process tubes individually attached to the common feed system header by means of welded connection piping (hereafter called hairpins).
(38) In order to control the process gas flow rate distribution, calibrated orifices are installed in the 50% cold tubes in order to reach the desired pressure drop.
(39) As illustrated in
(40) The suitable additional pressure drop has been estimated using a simple fluid mechanics correlation to be 0.33 bar in present example case, which roughly corresponds to 0.33/2 additional pressure drop to the whole reformer system. This estimated value corresponds to the difference between the pressure drop induced by the tubes at high feed flow rate level and the tubes at low feed flow rate level.
(41) The diameter of the calibrated orifice 814 has been determined using classical pressure drop laws, and checked by means of CFD simulations.
(42) It will be understood that different types of devices are able to generate suitable pressure drop in the tubes.
(43) Beside the one described here above, various devices may be proposed; some of them are suitable for being implemented in side-fired design fireboxes, others in top-fired design fired-box, others in both top and side-fired fireboxes, and any other type of tubular reformers.
(44) As illustrated by
(45) According to another variant illustrated by
(46) Alternatively, as illustrated in
(47)
(48) Still another way of adjusting the flow rate in the tubes, suitable for any type of tubular reformer, is to induce a desired pressure drop in tubes by the friction of the process fluid flowing inside porous media placed in the reforming tubes. Different behaviors in terms of pressure drop between tubes may be obtained by: filling the tubes with two different catalyst beds, which will imply two different behaviors in term of pressure drop; the tubes that have been identified as receiving too much duty, therefore needing to be cooled down, may be filled with conventional catalyst, and the tubes which have been identified as receiving insufficient duty, therefore needing to be heated up, may be filled either with a single type of catalyst pellets inducing an increased pressure drop or alternatively with catalyst pellets with different pressure drop characteristics used on a part of the tube length so as to adapt the pressure drop to the desired value; one can also imagine a single catalyst with a new pellet shape to be designed so as to reach the pressure drop and flow distribution specifications, or in case of a single catalyst in tubes, one can imagine filling the tube with more or less catalyst packed bed depending on the desired pressure drop and relative flow rate distribution
(49) As illustrated by
(50) Among the many advantages that ensue from the method of the invention are the following: the invention allows reducing maximum tubes temperature, and consequently increases their lifetime; the invention may also allow increasing the furnace efficiency; indeed, with a hotter furnace, better performances are obtained. As the fireboxes operation is limited by the hottest tube, once the temperature spread between tubes is reduced, the process may be operated at a higher average temperature; the invention is particularly advantageous in the case of steam methane reforming for CO production where the influence of temperature on efficiency is very important.
(51) While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims. The present invention may suitably comprise, consist or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed. Furthermore, if there is language referring to order, such as first and second, it should be understood in an exemplary sense and not in a limiting sense. For example, it can be recognized by those skilled in the art that certain steps can be combined into a single step.
(52) The singular forms a, an and the include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
(53) Comprising in a claim is an open transitional term which means the subsequently identified claim elements are a nonexclusive listing (i.e., anything else may be additionally included and remain within the scope of comprising). Comprising as used herein may be replaced by the more limited transitional terms consisting essentially of and consisting of unless otherwise indicated herein.
(54) Providing in a claim is defined to mean furnishing, supplying, making available, or preparing something. The step may be performed by any actor in the absence of express language in the claim to the contrary a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one.
(55) Optional or optionally means that the subsequently described event or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
(56) Ranges may be expressed herein as from about one particular value, and/or to about another particular value. When such particular value and/or to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range.
(57) All references identified herein are each hereby incorporated by reference into this application in their entireties, as well as for the specific information for which each is cited.