Synthesis of unit cell sized oxide particulates

Abstract

A method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates comprising preparing a water solution of a metal or ceramic salt or methanol solution of Pt, adding a 2-fold molar excess of KO.sub.2 to the water solution and forming a reaction solution, spinning down the reaction solution, and creating oxide nanoparticles.

Claims

1. A method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates, comprising: preparing a water solution of a metal or ceramic salt; stirring the water solution; adding KO.sub.2 to the water solution and forming a reaction solution comprising metal oxide nanoparticles wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles are selected from the group consisting of Fe.sub.3O.sub.4, Mn.sub.3O.sub.4, ZnO.sub.2, and Pt.sub.2O; stirring the reaction solution; placing the reaction solution in a centrifuge tube; spinning down the reaction solution; and harvesting the metal oxide nanoparticles wherein the metal oxide nanoparticles are selected from the group consisting of Fe.sub.3O.sub.4, Mn.sub.3O.sub.4, ZnO.sub.2, and Pt.sub.2O.

2. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 1 wherein the step of stirring the reaction solution is for about 10 minutes to about 1 hour.

3. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 2 wherein the step of spinning down comprises removing excess water.

4. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 3 wherein the step of spinning down to remove excess water is repeated until the remaining solution is pH neutral.

5. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 1 further including the step of: cleansing the oxide nanoparticles.

6. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 5 wherein the step of cleansing the oxide nanoparticles further comprises the steps of suspending the oxide nanoparticles in methanol and spinning down and removing the water and the methanol.

7. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 6 further comprising the step of: drying the oxide nanoparticles under a dynamic vacuum at room temperature.

8. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 7 wherein the step of drying under a dynamic vacuum is at about 10.sup.3 torr.

9. The method of making unit cell sized oxide particulates of claim 1 further comprising the step of: diluting the reaction solution by 50% with methanol after the step of adding a 2-fold molar excess of KO.sub.2 to the water solution and forming a reaction solution.

10. The product of the process of preparing a water solution of a metal or ceramic salt; stirring the water solution; adding a 2-fold molar excess of KO.sub.2 to the water solution and forming a reaction solution; stirring the reaction solution; placing the reaction solution in a centrifuge tube; spinning down the reaction solution; and creating oxide nanoparticles wherein the oxide nanoparticles are unit cell sized and are selected from the group consisting of Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 Mn.sub.3O.sub.4, ZnO.sub.2, and Pt.sub.2O.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is an illustration of a basic synthesis of the oxide particulates.

(2) FIG. 2 is an illustration of JOEL SEM EDAX showing no remaining potassium, sulfate, chlorine or acetate.

(3) FIG. 3 is an illustration of a transmission electron microscopic image of ZnO.sub.2 nanoparticulates. Average size estimate 1.7 nM.

(4) FIG. 4 is an illustration of X-ray diffraction patterns of ZnO.sub.2.

(5) FIG. 5 is an illustration of magnetic data of some of the oxides prepared. A. illustrates Mn.sub.3O.sub.4; B. illustrates Ni(OH).sub.2; C. illustrates Co.sub.3O.sub.4; and D. illustrates Cu(OH).sub.2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(6) The general synthetic approach is a simple two step process, as shown in FIG. 1.

(7) Here we show for the first time a solution based flash oxidative synthesis of oxide nanoparticles that produces oxide nanometer sized particles.

(8) This synthetic technique described herein also produces these particles in gram scale quantities, which is an order of magnitude greater than previous techniques.

(9) This synthetic approach not only works for metals, but also many different cations such as Mg, and Ce. Additionally, this synthetic technique can prepare nanoparticulate blends as precursors to many interesting compounds, such as ferroelectric, multiferroic, ferromagnetic or superconducting compounds.

Example 1

(10) A water solution of the metal or ceramic salt is prepared.

(11) To this rapidly stirring solution, a 2-fold molar excess of KO.sub.2 is added quickly.

(12) The solution stirs for approximately 10 minutes until it is cool enough to place into the plastic centrifuge tubes.

(13) The solution is spun down to remove excess water, and this process is repeated until the remaining solution is pH neutral (typically 5 repetitions).

(14) As a final cleansing of the nanoparticles, the material is re-suspended in methanol and spun down to remove the remaining water and methanol.

(15) The samples are dried under a dynamic vacuum (10.sup.3 torr) at room temperature to avoid heating the material, which could result in increasing the particle size.

(16) To date, this approach has made oxide nanoparticles using solutions of chlorides, sulphates or acetates; all of which resulted in the formation of oxide nanoparticles. This approach can work for many different types of solutions, including 2 row transition metals, Lanthanides, Actinides, semi-metals such as Bi or Sn, as well as other simple cations such as Ca, Sr, Ba, Sc, or Y.

(17) Control of the final product was achieved by two methods, reaction time or temperature of the solution prior to adding the KO.sub.2. Varying the length of time the solution was allowed to stir and react affected both the final oxidation and the particle size.

Example 2

(18) Minimum particle size for each material was achieved when the reaction was quenched 1-2 minutes after the KO.sub.2 was added by diluting the reaction mixture by 50% with methanol. For some reactions, this did not alter the final product for Mg(OH).sub.2, TiO.sub.2, CeO.sub.2, and ZnO.sub.2. However, for the Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Cu reactions, this quenching resulted in the formation of metal hydroxides. For Mn, Fe and Co, allowing the reaction to either proceed for approximately 20 minutes resulted in the formation of the M.sub.3O.sub.4 phase of each compound. For the Ni and Cu systems, prolonged reaction time resulted in the formation of NiOOH and CuO, respectively. Prolonged reaction times also resulted in an increase in particle size into the hundreds of nanometer scale.

Example 3

(19) By heating the solution before adding the KO.sub.2, a mix of higher oxidation state compounds and larger particle sizes were observed for several systems. The Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Cu systems formed mixes of Mn.sub.3O.sub.4 and MnO.sub.2, Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, for example. However, in the case of the reaction of SnCl.sub.2 with KO.sub.2, SnO.sub.2 was only formed when the reaction was heated to 90 C, and allowed to stir for 1 hour.

Example 4

(20) The Pt system proved to be challenging. Oxidation in water resulted in the formation of a mix of insoluble Pt compounds that were primarily an amorphous brown color, possibly indicating PtO.sub.2, or other mixed valence Pt compounds. In order to prepare a single phase Pt-0 compound, significant changes were made to the process.

(21) Rather than performing the reaction in water, the reaction was carried out in methanol. In this instance, the KO.sub.2 was added slowly due to the potential flammability of methanol.

(22) However, since the oxidation of Pt is not exothermic, all of the KO.sub.2 was added. As the reaction proceeded, the solution turned first clear yellow, then light brown, which then slowly turned black over 1 hour.

(23) After rinsing and drying, x-ray analysis indicated the formation of a Pt.sub.2O, with very small particle size.

(24) Tables 1 and 2 detail the experimental results, including X-ray analysis. Table 1 lists the initial and final product, the average particle size, and the average number of unit cells per particle, assuming the particles are spherical. The number of unit cells was rounded to the nearest whole number.

(25) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Particle Synthesis Analyses Particle Unit Cells Starting Size per Material Product Color (nM) Volume Particle MgSO.sub.4 Mg(OH).sub.2 White 0.990 40.840 24 Ti(SO.sub.4).sub.2 TiO.sub.2 Light Yellow 0.610 130.8 2 (anatase) FeCl.sub.2 Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 Black 0.530 544.080 1 Mn(Ac).sub.3 Mn.sub.3O.sub.4 Black 0.540 314.400 1 CoSO.sub.4 Co.sub.3O.sub.4 Black 1.790 516.370 11 Ni(Ac).sub.2 Ni(OH).sub.2 Light Green 1.460 38.500 86 Cu(Ac).sub.2 Cu(OH).sub.2 Blue-green 2.800 164.400 50 *Zn(Ac).sub.2 ZnO.sub.2 White 1.630 115.084 38 *Zn(Ac).sub.2 ZnO.sub.2 White 0.420 114.024 1 CeCl.sub.3 CeO.sub.2 Yellow-orange 0.750 181.700 2 SnCl.sub.2 SnO.sub.2 Faint yellow 0.850 71.550 9 H.sub.2PtCl.sub.6 Pt.sub.2O black 0.290 59.996 1

(26) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Detailed X-ray Data Space Product Group a b c Beta Re % S Mg(OH).sub.2 Fd-3m 3.130(7) 3.130(7) 4.81(5) 90. 7.75 1.5225 TiO.sub.2 I41/amd 3.806(17) 3.806(17) 9.03(11) 90.000 5.55 1.4342 Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 Fd-3m 8.163(7) 8.163(7) 8.163(7) 90.000 2 1.2425 Mn.sub.3O.sub.4 141/amd 5.759(12) 5.759(12) 9.48(2) 90.000 7.5 1.602 Co.sub.3O.sub.4 Fd-3m 8.023 8.023 8.023 90.000 0.92 1.8092 Ni(OH).sub.2 P-3m1 3.105(7) 3.105(7) 4.61(3) 90. 2.74 3.7594 Cu(OH).sub.2 Cmc21 2.954(3) 10.569(17) 5.266(4) 90.000 5.19 1.4517 {circumflex over ()}ZnO.sub.2 Pa-3 4.862(3) 4.865(3) 4.865(3) 90.000 5.49 1.7804 *ZnO.sub.2 Pa-3 4.849(4) 4.849(4) 4.849(4) 90.000 3.67 1.7168 CeO.sub.2 Fm-3m 5.664(11) 5.664(11) 5.664(11) 90.000 6.49 1.3617 SnO.sub.2 P42/mnm 4.738(15) 4.738(15) 3.183(17) 90.000 9.1 1.1884 Pt.sub.2O Pn-3m 3.9141(7) 3.9141(7) 3.9141(7) 90.000 5.93 1.7317 *Prepared by quenching the oxidation by adding 50 mL of methanol after a reaction time of 2 minutes. {circumflex over ()}This data was reproduced after the sample was left dry at room temperature for 7 days. TEM images were also taken from this aged samples.

(27) Elemental analysis was performed on a JOEL SEM in EDAX mode. Because the metal salts either have chlorine, acetate or sulfate as the anion, EDAX data was collected on the Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 made from FeCl.sub.2, Co.sub.3O.sub.4 made from CoSO.sub.4 and the Ni(OH).sub.2 made from nickel acetate. As seen in FIG. 2, EDAX showed only the presence of the metal and oxygen.

(28) Particle size analysis was primarily performed on the Rigaku SmartLab using the PDXL2 program. Peaks were fit via a Split Psuedo-Voigt function and refined to minimize % Re and S, which provide a measure of the accuracy of the degree of fit to the x-ray diffraction pattern. For the ZnO.sub.2 size analysis, TEM images were also taken in order to confirm the X-ray analyses. As shown in FIG. 3, the TEM indicates that the ZnO.sub.2 particles were approximately 1.7 nM, which is in good agreement with the X-ray analysis, which calculated an average particle size of 1.63 nM. This falls within the expected deviation of +5%, as reported in literature when comparing X-ray particle size analysis to TEM particle size analysis.

(29) One additional advantage of this approach is that the oxide particles are very stable over time, even when dry. The TEM images were taken of a week old sample of nanometer sized ZnO.sub.2 particles. As shown in FIG. 4 where A is the initial ZnO.sub.2 sample, B and C are the same sample of 1 and then 2 weeks of aging. Pattern D shows the ZnO.sub.2 pattern for the sample with an average particle size of 0.42 nM, which is within experimental effort of the size of a single ZnO.sub.2 unit cell.

(30) Magnetic Data was collected to characterize the magnetic behavior of the metal oxide nanoparticles. Behavior observed was very similar to that predicted in the literature. As shown in FIG. 5A, the Mn.sub.3O.sub.4 shows a ferromagnetic transition at approximately 42 K, as expected, as well as significant differences between the field cooled and zero field cooled magnetism. Again confirming the nanoparticulates nature of the oxides prepared.

(31) FIG. 5b shows the low temperature onset of ferromagnetism of Ni(OH).sub.2 nanoparticles as shown in literature. FIG. 5C shows similar behavior for the Co.sub.3O.sub.4 nanoparticles, with a ferromagnetic onset at 25 K, as expected from literature. FIG. 5D shows the paramagnetic behavior of Cu(OH).sub.2. It is important to note that there is a very minimal upturning at low temperature indicating the high purity of the copper hydroxide product.

(32) Another additional advantage is the use of these nanomaterials as precursors to even smaller metal particles. Typically, metal particles are formed by the reduction of a metal salt in a solution using a reducing agent such as NaBH.sub.4. A good general method for this is called the polyol method, when ethylene glycol, or other type of glycol is used as the solvent.

(33) Here we prepared metal nanoparticles from the Ni(OH).sub.2 and Cu(OH).sub.2 nanoparticles. Typically, 3 grams of material were dissolved in 100 mL of ethylene glycol. In order to limit the formation of large particles, the NaBh.sub.4 was added in small amounts until a few flake like crystals could be seen in solution. This was determined to be the end point in the reduction, and the solution was further diluted by the addition of 50 mL of water. This was then spun down and centrifuged several times in methanol to remove the water and ethylene glycol. The metal particles were then dried under a dynamic vacuum for 24 hours and then characterized by x-ray diffraction. Initial tests on reduction of Ni(OH).sub.2 showed that nanoparticles of 12 nM were produced.

(34) As described herein, this is a simple, one step method for creating oxide nanoparticles. The oxide nanoparticles are as small as an individual unit cell.

(35) This method is applicable for producing oxides nanoparticles for most of the metals or ceramic precursors in the periodic table.

(36) The synthesis technique does not require the use of expensive capping agents or complex chemicals to perform.

(37) The synthesis produced grams of material and is scalable, whereas other synthetic methods can only generate micrograms of material.

(38) This approach can also be used to create blends of metal oxide particulates suitable for inks in various types of 3-d and 2-d processing techniques, including metal oxide inks, as well as ceramic inks.

(39) Additionally, blends of different oxides, such as oxide particles of yttrium, barium and copper could be combined to create a nanoparticulate precursor to the YBa.sub.2Cu.sub.3O.sub.7x superconductor.

(40) Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the claimed invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Any reference to claim elements in the singular, e.g., using the articles a, an, the, or said is not construed as limiting the element to the singular.