HIGH-FILTRATION EFFICIENCY WALL-FLOW FILTER
20220325645 · 2022-10-13
Assignee
Inventors
- Manuel Gensch (Aschaffenburg, DE)
- Martin Foerster (Büdingen, DE)
- Naina Deibel (Pfungstadt, DE)
- Antje Oltersdorf (Freiburg, DE)
- Juergen Koch (Hanau, DE)
Cpc classification
F01N3/022
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/035
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2370/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T10/12
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F01N2330/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2330/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01J37/0244
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01N3/0222
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2510/0682
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01J37/349
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01N2250/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F01N3/035
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01D46/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J37/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for producing a wall-flow filter for removing fine particulate solids from gases, and to the use thereof for cleaning exhaust gases of an internal combustion engine. The invention also relates to a correspondingly produced exhaust-gas filter having a high filtration efficiency.
Claims
1. Method for producing a wall-flow filter for purifying gases from small particulate solids, wherein a dry powder/gas aerosol is applied to the inlet region of the dry filter, characterized in that the powder contains a pyrogenic, high-melting metal compound produced by flame hydrolysis or flame oxidation from a metal precursor in a flame, and the amount of pyrogenic high-melting compound in the filter is less than 5 g/l.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic high-melting compound is selected from the group consisting of silicon dioxide, aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, zirconium dioxide, cerium oxide, iron oxide, zinc oxide, mixed oxides of the aforementioned oxides or mixtures thereof.
3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic high-melting compound is subjected to a shear force prior to the application to the filter.
4. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the shear force is caused by one or more devices selected from the group consisting of a wear-free atomizer nozzle, a wind sifter, a mill and a baffle plate.
5. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the average particle size (d50) of the pyrogenic high-melting compound is between 0.1 μm and 50 μm.
6. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic high-melting compound has a BET surface area of >50 m.sup.2/g.
7. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic high-melting compound in the powder/gas aerosol is mixed with further non-pyrogenic high-melting compounds.
8. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the wall-flow filter has been catalytically coated prior to application of the pyrogenic high-melting compound.
9. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pyrogenic and/or non-pyrogenic compounds themselves are catalytically active.
10. A wall-flow filter obtainable by a method according to claim 1.
11. A method for the purification of automobile gases comprising passing the automobile gases through the wall-flow filter according to claim 10.
Description
EXAMPLE 1
[0055] Coating a raw washcoat-free filter having dimensions 4.66″×6.00″ 300/8 with powder.
[0056] The pyrogenically produced powder was dispersed with the aid of an atomizer nozzle at 2 bar and sucked into the filter at a rate of 20 m/s.
TABLE-US-00003 Relative* increase Relative* in filtration pressure efficiency increase 0.6 g pyrogenic Al.sub.2O.sub.3/liter filter volume 5.5% 2% 1.2 g pyrogenic Al.sub.2O.sub.3/liter filter volume 9% 3% 0.3 g pyrogenic Al.sub.2O.sub.3 + 1.2 g Al.sub.2O.sub.3 6% 1% with a d50 of 3 μm/liter filter volume *Relative to an uncoated raw filter substrate without additional powder coating
Example 2
[0057] In a 1st step, the filter was coated with 50 g/l washcoat in the porous filter wall, dried and calcined. It was then coated with 2 g/l pyrogenically produced powder. The powder was dispersed at 2 bar with the aid of a wear-free atomizer nozzle and sucked into the filter at a rate of 20 m/s. The filtration efficiency increase and the increase in pressure loss were determined at 600 m.sup.3/h relative to the powder-free filter.
TABLE-US-00004 Relative* increase Relative* in filtration pressure efficiency increase 2 g pyrogenic Al.sub.2O.sub.3/liter filter volume 47% 10% *Relative to the substrate coated only with washcoat