OPTICAL SENSOR ELEMENT

Abstract

The invention relates to an optical sensor element, comprising indicators, selected from luminescence-active means that are of the same type or different, and indicator protectors, and to a sensor, comprising at least one such sensor element, an energy source that excites the luminescence emission of the indicators, and a detector unit, wherein the sensor element or sensor is suitable for detecting molecular oxygen in a gaseous or liquid medium and/or for determining the molecular oxygen content of a gaseous or liquid medium and at least one layer of the sensor element bearing the indicator protectors is designed in such a way that the diffusion rate of the molecular oxygen formed on the indicator protectors by means of the reduction of strong oxidants back into the medium is greater than the diffusion rate of molecular oxygen from the medium in the direction of the at-least-one layer bearing the indicator molecules.

Claims

1. An optical sensor element comprising: at least one indicator composed of a luminescence-active agent; and at least one indicator protector selected from (a) reducing agents and/or catalysts for the reduction of strong oxidants, (b) adsorbents for chemisorption or physisorption of strong oxidants, or (c) a combination of (a) and (b), wherein the element has at least two layers, and the at least one indicator and the at least one indicator protector are arranged in different layers of the element, and the element comprises at least one indicator-bearing layer and at least one indicator protector-bearing layer, and wherein the at least one indicator protector is arranged in a layer of the element that faces towards the medium and the at least one indicator is arranged in at least one layer that is mounted facing away from the medium.

2. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indicator protector-bearing layer is substantially free of indicators.

3. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indicator is selected from luminescence indicators, the luminescence emission of which is selectively quenched on contact with at least one analyte selected from oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, halide ions, heavy metal ions, hydroxide ions and hydronium ions.

4. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indicator is selected from luminescence indicators, the luminescence emission of which is selectively quenched on contact with molecular oxygen.

5. The optical sensor element according to claim 4, wherein the at least one indicator is selected from complexes of ruthenium, rhenium, rhodium, iridium, or lanthanide, or from metallated porphyrins, unmetallated porphyrins, or mixtures of any of the foregoing, or mixtures of any of the foregoing in combination with fluorinated dyes and/or light stabilizers.

6. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indicator protector is selected from (a) reducing agents and/or catalysts for the reduction of halogens, ozone, hydroxyl radicals, peroxide radicals and/or superoxides, (b) adsorbents, for chemisorption or physisorption of halogens, ozone, hydroxyl radicals, peroxide radicals and/or superoxides, or (c) a combination of (a) and (b).

7. The optical sensor element according to claim 6, wherein the at least one indicator protector includes reducing agents selected from at least one redox-active polymers containing one or more oxidizable functional groups, activated carbon, zeolites, metal oxide, or semiconductor oxide.

8. The optical sensor element according to claim 7, wherein the at least one indicator protector is loaded with at least one platinum-group metal.

9. The optical sensor element according to claim 6, wherein the at least one indicator protector does not adsorb or inactivate or neutralize the analytes.

10. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least two layers of the element differ in terms of at least one of their layer thickness and the composition of a matrix material.

11. The optical sensor element according to claim 10, wherein each of the at least two layers of the element comprises a matrix material selected from a polymer or polymer mixture, such that the at least two layers differ in terms of at least one of the type, concentration and/or degree of crosslinking of the polymer building blocks.

12. The optical sensor element according to claim 1, wherein the at least one indicator protector-bearing layer of the sensor element is configured in such a way that a diffusion rate from the indicator protector-bearing layer back into the medium of molecular oxygen that is formed on the at least one indicator protector by reduction of a strong oxidant is greater than a diffusion rate of molecular oxygen from the medium in the direction of the at-least-one indicator molecule-bearing layer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0094] FIG. 1 shows a two-layer construction of the sensor element according to the invention.

[0095] FIG. 2 shows a four-layer construction of the sensor element according to the invention.

[0096] FIG. 3 shows the changes in the phase angle between a sensor element according to the invention and a sensor element known from the prior art, in each case following exposure to chlorine in a chlorine-free and oxygen-free environment.

[0097] FIG. 4 shows the changes in the phase angle between a sensor element according to the invention and a sensor element known from the prior art, in each case following exposure to ozone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0098] FIG. 1 shows a two-layer construction of the sensor element according to the invention, comprising an indicator protector (.Math.) bearing layer (1) and an indicator () bearing layer (2). Layer (1) contacts the medium (M), and layer (2) is coupled with the optical system (OS).

[0099] FIG. 2 shows a four-layer construction of the sensor element according to the invention, comprising an indicator protector (.Math.) bearing layer (1) and an indicator () bearing layer (2). Layer (2) is coupled with the optical system (OS). There is a light-reflecting layer (LRS) situated between layers (1) and (2). An optical isolation layer (OIS), which contacts the medium (M), is applied to side (1.1) of layer (1).

EXAMPLE 1

[0100] In the outer layer of a three-layer silicone membrane for an oxygen sensor, 20 percent by weight, relative to the mass of the wetted layer, of activated carbon particles with a diameter of 10-50 microns were immobilized. The procedure for this was as follows:

[0101] The prepolymer for the first membrane layer was weighed and mixed with a certain amount of a solvent. Subsequently, the activated carbon particles were added to the mixture and the entire mass was mixed. Thereafter, the polymer mixture was placed on a smooth surface, generating an approximately 150 micron thick layer. After the solvent was evaporated, the layer was ready to have further layers built up on it. The other layers were constructed in accordance with methods known to specialists in the field. A small circle of the sensor membrane fabricated in this way was bonded to the glass surface of a VisiFerm sensor cap, so that the sensory layer of the constructed membrane is facing toward the excitation light source of the sensor. To test the effect of the invention, the stability of the sensing membrane described here against attack by dissolved chlorine was compared with that of a conventional membrane, such as the one presently marketed by the applicant for the optical sensor VisiFerm.

[0102] As described above, the destruction of the luminescence indicator is clearly reflected in the change of the relationship between the measured phase angle and oxygen partial pressure. This is also particularly true for the phase angle that is measured in an oxygen-free sensor environment, because the luminescence quenching takes place only in the presence of oxygen. The phase angle determined there is therefore particularly suitable for detecting a relevant change in the sensory properties and for examining the stability of the sensor membrane. For comparison, two identically constructed sensors were used, with one sensor having a conventional membrane, and the other being fitted with the membrane according to the invention. Both sensors were connected to a data acquisition system for recording the measured phase angle and simultaneously installed in a reaction vessel filled with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. To record the initial situation, the medium in the reaction vessel was first purged with nitrogen to remove dissolved oxygen from the medium. The corresponding phase angles were measured with both sensors. Thereafter, a uniform 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution was continuously added to the hydrochloric acid by means of a dosing apparatus, while constantly stirring, so that both sensors were exposed to the same definite volume of dissolved chlorine generated by the procedure. After 15 minutes the supply of sodium hypochlorite was stopped and the solution was again purged with nitrogen to expel the generated chlorine as well as any newly registered oxygen from the solution. Then the phase angle was recorded again. The chlorine exposure and nitrogenization was repeated four times.

[0103] FIG. 3 shows the changes in the phase angle of the two sensors, in each case measured after a chlorine exposure in a chlorine-free and oxygen-free environment, in reference to the initial situation. In the case of the conventional sensor membrane, the phase angle measured in an oxygen-free sensor environment decreased after four exposures to 90% of its initial value, while in the case of the protected membrane, the phase angle remained almost unchanged. If this phase angle falls by about 10% or more, the sensor membrane becomes unusable, because the Stern-Volmer relation is no longer accurate enough and/or cannot be determined accurately enough. This is the case after the fourth chlorine exposure of the conventional membrane. As the comparison clearly demonstrates, the sensor membrane according to the invention is significantly more stable against an oxidative attack by chlorine and is still fully functional after four attacks.

EXAMPLE 2

[0104] Analogously to example 1, a sensor membrane was evaluated in regard to its ozone resistance. The sensor membrane was constructed with 25 percent by weight activated carbon, relative to the layer in contact with the medium. To test the effect of the invention, the stability of the sensor membrane against an attack by dissolved ozone was compared to that of a conventional membrane in a manner similar to that described above. For this purpose, pure oxygen was passed through one of the ozonizers and the gas mixture was directed into a reaction vessel filled with water, in which a sensor with a conventional membrane and a sensor with a membrane according to the invention were fitted, for about two hours. As can be seen from FIG. 4, in the case of the conventional sensor membrane the phase angle decreased to about 95% of its initial value following ozone exposure in an oxygen-free environment, whereas the phase angle remained unchanged in the case of the membrane protected in accordance with the invention. As this comparison shows, the sensor membrane according to the invention is also significantly more stable against an oxidative attack by ozone.

[0105] The invention is particularly suitable for the measurement of dissolved oxygen when strong oxidative substances, such as those used, e.g., for disinfection, which totally or partially destroy conventional membranes in a short time, are present in the medium.